I regularly love at home.

It's no fun when you edit your posts to fix your mistakes :(

Edited by notorganic: 8/12/2014 05:21:59 PM

Thank fuck for KA. Seriously. Most of you lonely carnts that act so tough on here are probably a) still living at home, b) never had an actual job/real world experience outside of uni (no problem there, just saying) and c) wouldn't dare talk to people in real life like you do on here. Prime examples are TSF and melbourne_terrace.

TSF is a mad bloke but mate, take it easy with the thinking you're a sick cunt shit. If you do it in real life, someone is going to bottle you - If you can't handle a thread on a forum being closed, get a bit more life experience.

melbourne_terrace lad, I'm still waiting for that private message about when we're meeting up. I'd be lying if I said I was surprised I've heard nothing.

Edited by Draupnir: 8/12/2014 05:21:08 PM

I know lollywood is just a TWG/FA type troll but I never understood what brand of faux-elitism he is trying to sell lol.

Must be all that social outcastness that I live through day to day.

-PB

I see you have some statistics in your sig, you patriarchal monster.

Love it

Good post, I agree.

I would like to support KA in what he is trying to acheive here especially in eradicating the moronic bleatings of the resident women haters.

This forum has developed the way it has in a cause & effect progression, a bunch of social outcasts who found football as a last refuge due to their subsequent rejection in all social circles who then discoved this forums with hundreds of Football Manager pasty faced losers. As time went on & they became comfortable in their positions they started to empathise with each other in regards to their unspoken social status & in this a consensus developed when it came to women.

Read the heartfelt posts in the threads that involved women, there is a theme here. After hundreds & hundreds of rejections both in person & in online the loneliness developed into bile which developed into the MRA victimhood after spending their entire lives in the friendzone. Occasionally they would perk up & behave like human beings whenever the token woman on the forum acknowledged their existence or perhaps gave them a laughing emoticon making them think they had a chance with her or with any women however as time went on this morphed once again in the victimhood we see today.

From this morose swamp of idiocy a cult leader of sorts emerged who convinced other forumites that he knew how to break the mold that the rest of them found themselves in however anybody who had half a brain knew that this person used his red pill lunacy & NLP musings to disguise another essential hatred of the female of the species.

Well done on nipping this in the bud & let this be a lesson to anyone to perhaps muse on your own inadequacies & perhaps move forward in developing a healthy respect & rapport with the female of the species.

Onya Kev.

So that's how they reproduce.

Did they just kiss?

Shit is spreading;



-PB

Night gathers, and now my watch begins.

I too shall wear the black...

Implying there was a reason to get involved in the first place?

Good, then there won't be any more reason for me to get involved, eh?

With all due respect I think you are way over the top in applying this label and seem to be dishing it out liberally to anyone or anything that even hints at opposing your strict beliefs in regards to this subject.

I expressed my opinion on your motivations in banning Notor and shutting down other threads and you rushed in to label me an MRA despite me not having said anything about women or anything remotely pro men, and then you lock the thread before I can have a chance to justify myself. I'm not trying to be a dick but it seems your tolerance for anything that goes even slightly against your views is less than minimal, you're unfairly jumping to conclusions about the views of certain posters and you are definitely overrating the presence of misogynistic thought as a result.

:lol: \:d/ \:d/ \:d/

All aboard the AF westdydney.net hypetrain.

3 years minimum.

Maybe they should have just killed off the forums with the new site.

Geeeezzz how far 442 has fallen from several years ago.

-PB

hmm

Banning me would obviously fly in the face of your own comments about the pursuit of an agenda not being an issue, but clearly as the figurehead of a privately owned company you have the right to push away as many active contributors to your community as you wish.

Matt, I think I've made it quite clear this debate ends. You have your views. Proselytise elsewhere.

Persist and you'll be banned for a long time.

What’s the current record on the shortest amount of time from someones ban ending to being banned again?



With all due respect, Kevin, you’re either full of crap or you’re allowing your reading of the discussion here be tainted by influences you have come across outside these forums.

I would challenge you to provide examples of these discussions being unfriendly for women to take part in.

The pejorative language you use refers to things that have never been asserted on these forums, and you are using the inability for people like Munrubenmuz to argue against polemics without resorting to strawman fallacies or personal attacks as a platform to assert that this discussion is unfriendly to women.

Case in point:


It’s an incredibly simplistic summary of a complex discussion that was generally balanced, both sides giving examples and statistics to back up their comments. There was even consensus from everyone that all kids should be encouraged to explore their interests regardless of gender. Just to quote myself:
It’s not exactly the rhetoric of someone blaming the world for their own issues the way you are suggesting, is it.

Nobody said a thing about straight or white, the discussion was around the way media represents men as slovenly dullards and how this trope is unjustified.




I don’t recall anybody self-identifying as an MRA (Mens Rights Activists, for people that don’t know) on these forums, Kevin, and even if there were MRA’s here how would you possibly justify calling them “twats, losers and saddoes” at the same time as asserting that you will not allow these forums to become an “unfriendly place for people of a certain gender”?

My agenda is equality of opportunity for all humans, which includes women having agency and responsibility for their actions. My snark when arguing this point doesn’t make me a misogynist (misogyny is the ”Hatred of women”, for people that don’t know), and neither does referring to legitimate study and statistics when arguing my point. It’s like saying that an animal shelter that caters for both cats and dogs, but shows statistics that cats are focused on and adopted more than dogs must have a hatred of cats.

It just doesn’t make logical sense, and neither do your unprofessional & libelous outbursts.

I do have something special for Manrub, tho.


Dude, it’s in the exact same thread!


I chose not to address those specific accusations at the time because they were just more strawman fallacies, projecting an argument that I was never making.

I would much rather move forward and make a case for my arguments than look backwards and constantly defend myself from unfounded personal attacks such as “you hate women because you couldn’t get a root”.

By the by, I won’t be modifying my opinions on gender politics because of the attempted shaming tactics employed here. I’ll probably tone down the snark a bit, but I will continue to make the evidence-based case that equality is something that all humans have a right to regardless of ”gender, race, etc etc”. Even straight white men.

[youtube]7pdWAcK6Eh8[/youtube]

Amen

May I make a suggestion in the future that if someone makes an inappropriate post, or a post that contravenes rules, that that person's post is either deleted and/or they receive a ban etc, rather than just lock a whole thread.

As you saw, those threads had people debating the issue on both sides, rather than just a rant fest amongst all posters.

A thread should not be locked just because it discusses gender politics.

Pathetic :lol:

Don't care.