paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
6:20am Washington time, let's see if we can get this called before bedtime for us.
|
|
|
|
scott20won
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Hahaha. Simon Hill should do a commentary. Except not quite 32 years of heartbreak
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
PA about to announce 20k votes of 50k outstanding, if Biden doesn't pull right up next to Trump I guess it's over.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Biden overtakes in PA. This is the decisive moment. Tune in to your broadcaster of choice right now if you're not already.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPA about to announce 20k votes of 50k outstanding, if Biden doesn't pull right up next to Trump I guess it's over. 87% of those votes announced going to Biden. Decisive.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Wow 6000 ahead in Pennsylvania. I'd pay a small fortune to be a fly on Trump's wall today.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
The TV for my new place just grew by at least five inches.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Secret Service upping security and the FAA declaring a no-fly zone at Biden HQ as befits a President-Elect.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Foxnews calling Pennsylvania for biden. Who has 273 votes
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+xFoxnews calling Pennsylvania for biden. Who has 273 votes Classic 2020. I guess they just wanted to be first for the headlines. Communist propaganda network CNN won't call it until it's legit. Once they and the AP go for it then it's official in my view.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
270towin.com calling PA for Biden as well.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Cnn host calling out murdoch . Saying fox and the Murdoch's should put their country first before their profits.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Blue Tsunami.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBlue Tsunami.  Watch the midterms in two years. Itll probably end up with repubs
|
|
|
scott20won
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xCnn host calling out murdoch . Saying fox and the Murdoch's should put their country first before their profits. Commies aren’t in power yet and they are telling people how to speak.
|
|
|
scott20won
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xCnn host calling out murdoch . Saying fox and the Murdoch's should put their country first before their profits. Commies aren’t in power yet and they are telling people how to speak. But seriously CNN haven’t confronted Biden’s cognitive decline or Budilinski (bad spell) claims about the big guy. They do the same thing.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xCnn host calling out murdoch . Saying fox and the Murdoch's should put their country first before their profits. Commies aren’t in power yet and they are telling people how to speak. Really? Stop playing partisan and move the hell on.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBlue Tsunami.  Watch the midterms in two years. Itll probably end up with repubs Yup. GOP will stonewall in the Senate and Biden will cop the blame, leading to the House going to GOP too.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWow 6000 ahead in Pennsylvania. I'd pay a small fortune to be a fly on Trump's wall today. Unlikely but hope the numbers are strong enough everywhere for Trump to give up on his court challenges.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xCnn host calling out murdoch . Saying fox and the Murdoch's should put their country first before their profits. Commies aren’t in power yet and they are telling people how to speak. But seriously CNN haven’t confronted Biden’s cognitive decline or Budilinski (bad spell) claims about the big guy. They do the same thing. I'm not here to defend any individual media outlet but I don't see why any particular outlet should be obliged to reply to the sledges from another outlet. As for the other thing I can't respond because if you can't be bothered to spell it then I can't google it. Either way, CNN v Fox News is a sperate argument; the election was Biden v Trump.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBlue Tsunami.  Watch the midterms in two years. Itll probably end up with repubs Yup. GOP will stonewall in the Senate and Biden will cop the blame, leading to the House going to GOP too. Its happened for ages. Hence why America is always at risk of having the government shut down. Instead of doing what's right for the country both sides are hyper partisan that they rather the country litterally burn then work with each other. And the American people are none the wiser
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBlue Tsunami.  Watch the midterms in two years. Itll probably end up with repubs Who knows what the post-Trump political landscape will be.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBlue Tsunami.  Watch the midterms in two years. Itll probably end up with repubs Who knows what the post-Trump political landscape will be. I'm hoping the political climate has changed. But I doubt it. Their system is so broken and antiquated. The citizens deserve better but the political elite don't want it to change. So the people see no change and things like trumpism happens
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Biden’s intellectually up to being president.
Without having CNN, I must say that it has been widely suggested that CNN hasn’t been as objective as it once was. I’d still much rather watch it than Fox News, mind your
Thats why I like PBS NewsHours. The specialist reporters are very fair and instructive with their coverage of the election. The host, Judy Woodruff, asks pertinent questions with grace and clarity. She doesn’t preach, she doesn’t admonish. She has heaps of experts on the show from across the political divide (e.g. both constitutional law professors who are in favour of and against the appointment of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court at this juncture). She gets people from the US civil service. Big tech is a big issue now, so there are plenty of interviews with world experts on that. She gets As there’s a pandemic she often interviews some of the best epidemiologists and public health experts such ad Dr Anthony Fauci.
The programme is basically Judy Woodruff being calm, measured and eloquent and asking lots of questions of other experts. In an era of increasing polarisation and social-media powered misinformation, more of this is needed.
Less tribalism, more compassion, more focus on merit (rather than symbolism) and more reporting of empirical fact as empirical fact.
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBiden’s intellectually up to being president.
Funny listening to conservatives going on and on about this when Reagan went into re-election with his alzheimers well underway.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
scott20won
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xCnn host calling out murdoch . Saying fox and the Murdoch's should put their country first before their profits. Commies aren’t in power yet and they are telling people how to speak. But seriously CNN haven’t confronted Biden’s cognitive decline or Budilinski (bad spell) claims about the big guy. They do the same thing. I'm not here to defend any individual media outlet but I don't see why any particular outlet should be obliged to reply to the sledges from another outlet. As for the other thing I can't respond because if you can't be bothered to spell it then I can't google it. Either way, CNN v Fox News is a sperate argument; the election was Biden v Trump. Agree. CNN just had another dig at Fox but I doubt people in US who watch CNN would even be aware of it (as they wouldn’t watch Fox or switch over).
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBiden’s intellectually up to being president.
Funny listening to conservatives going on and on about this when Reagan went into re-election with his alzheimers well underway. Hypocrisy from the gop? No can't be
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBiden’s intellectually up to being president. Without having CNN, I must say that it has been widely suggested that CNN hasn’t been as objective as it once was. I’d still much rather watch it than Fox News, mind your Thats why I like PBS NewsHours. The specialist reporters are very fair and instructive with their coverage of the election. The host, Judy Woodruff, asks pertinent questions with grace and clarity. She doesn’t preach, she doesn’t admonish. She has heaps of experts on the show from across the political divide (e.g. both constitutional law professors who are in favour of and against the appointment of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court at this juncture). She gets people from the US civil service. Big tech is a big issue now, so there are plenty of interviews with world experts on that. She gets As there’s a pandemic she often interviews some of the best epidemiologists and public health experts such ad Dr Anthony Fauci. The programme is basically Judy Woodruff being calm, measured and eloquent and asking lots of questions of other experts. In an era of increasing polarisation and social-media powered misinformation, more of this is needed. Less tribalism, more compassion, more focus on merit (rather than symbolism) and more reporting of empirical fact as empirical fact. Not sure how they used to be but from what I've seen CNN are painfully biased. I pretty much see CNN as Fox News for the Democrats.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBiden’s intellectually up to being president. Without having CNN, I must say that it has been widely suggested that CNN hasn’t been as objective as it once was. I’d still much rather watch it than Fox News, mind your Thats why I like PBS NewsHours. The specialist reporters are very fair and instructive with their coverage of the election. The host, Judy Woodruff, asks pertinent questions with grace and clarity. She doesn’t preach, she doesn’t admonish. She has heaps of experts on the show from across the political divide (e.g. both constitutional law professors who are in favour of and against the appointment of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court at this juncture). She gets people from the US civil service. Big tech is a big issue now, so there are plenty of interviews with world experts on that. She gets As there’s a pandemic she often interviews some of the best epidemiologists and public health experts such ad Dr Anthony Fauci. The programme is basically Judy Woodruff being calm, measured and eloquent and asking lots of questions of other experts. In an era of increasing polarisation and social-media powered misinformation, more of this is needed. Less tribalism, more compassion, more focus on merit (rather than symbolism) and more reporting of empirical fact as empirical fact. Not sure how they used to be but from what I've seen CNN are painfully biased. I pretty much see CNN as Fox News for the Democrats. MSNBC too. Have to read from both Fox and CNN to get some perspective imo. Yang on CNN made is rank choice voting comment again. It’s a great way to fix 2 party politics. Hence it won’t pass.
|
|
|