:lol:

Cruz panders to retarded bible-thumpers, Shillary panders to "It's time for a women president" voters, Bernie panders to college kids who want free shit, what's your point?

Trump platform is predominately a nationalist one that is against globalisation, and the voters who have been most affected by globalisation are blue-collar whites who feel they've been left behind.

It's no coincidence that the people buying Trump's crap are uneducated. If he actually had a coherent plan to protect the interests of blue collar Americans then it might make more sense. Instead it's basically a constituency of stupid, angry white voters supporting Trump because he's smart enough to say exactly what they want to hear.

The only genuine economic nationalist/protectionist in the race is Sanders.

Edited by JP: 21/2/2016 02:18:43 PM

Burn you elitist prick.

:)

That's not my multi, 100% honest.

I'd guess it's Ricecrackers.

It's definitely Ricecrackers.

Loving watching these champagne socialists burn to a crisp.

That's the entire platform of Trump's campaign :lol: :lol: :lol:

Trump is anti shitty free trade deals (TPP, TTIP, NAFTA etc), anti shitty trade deals with China, Mexico etc and anti offshoring and h1b visa's - he even threatened a 35% tax on companies who move factories overseas.

Right wing ideology correlates with lower education

1. He barely has a "platform." President Trump simply wouldn't have the power to reverse the TPP or NAFTA, and that 35% tax is a bullshit claim to appease his supporters that would never be practically implemented. Like all his policies, his economic platform is bereft of detail.

2. He was able to expand the business empire that you keep referring to as such a success story via the benefits of globalisation. The only reason he's taking a protectionist stance now is because it's what his supporters want to hear.

You are deluded if you think that Trump actually believes what he's saying; more so if you think there's any chance that his vague ramblings that you call his "platform" would ever be practically implemented.

...says the Bernie Sanders supporter

I don't support Bernie Sanders, Ricey.

I will give Sanders credit for the fact that his Presidential platform is based on views he's essentially held for his entire life, whereas Trump's platform is a matter of electoral convenience.

So you support Hillary Clinton? even worse
she should be in jail

Everything wrong with the political system and the epitome of wall street corruption.

But you're educated and intelligent right. :roll:

"Vote for me because I'm a woman"

what a platform

:lol: Insightful as always Ricey.

Anyone who supports the status quo supports the death culture and disastrous foreign policy that destroyed Iraq, Libya and Syria.
You may as well support ISIS.

Without a shadow of a doubt.

I'll laugh so hard when chairman Hillary gets the Democrat nomination despite getting less of the primary vote nationwide.
This will teach the champagne socialists a lesson in how the democratic process is corrupted within their own party of choice.

This JP bloke doesnt know what he stands for. He just parrots mainstream media talking points.

Might need a bit more berley there ricey.


Edited by mcjules: 21/2/2016 06:05:10 PM

this whole superdelegates business in the democratic party is pretty dodgy

Some people would rather talk about rice than stick to the topic of the USA Presidential elections.

Back on topic

Republicans support incidents like this

I can see some rationale in it because those superdelegates are the ones that have to work with whoever is elected. This also is the argument for the 50/50 vote for the Labor party leadership. It just seems nuts when you go through the expense of all these primaries to potentially count for little.

No the democrats do when they introduce gun free zones and don't allow self defence

Self defence?

Could you show one example of one instance of any country in the world where the self defence theory has ever worked?

The theory of 'the way to stop a bad man with a gun is for a good man to have a gun' has been proven to be baloney.

Only one ?

http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/dallas-county/dpd-officer-good-samartians-team-up-to-take-down-walmart-shooter/40712005

http://wreg.com/2016/02/15/suspect-shot-after-attempting-to-break-into-home/

http://www.hendersonvillelightning.com/news/4888-homeowner-shoots-at-burglar-who-pulled-gun.html#.VsXmmehtDWg.twitter

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/local/man-71-shoots-home-intruder/88728625

I guess fully automatic M60s should be freely available too, considering their firing rate would be so 'effective' in self defence...?
How about hand grenades? Got to be as safe as possible.....

Yes, touché, but you're talking about isolated instances I'm talking about as part of a national strategy, which is also what the gun lobby is talking about.

Edited by Joffa: 21/2/2016 11:02:04 PM




Edited by Joffa: 21/2/2016 11:06:41 PM