Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Biden Press Secratary April 7 2017: "Also what is the legal authority for strikes? Assad is a brutal dictator. But Syria is a sovereign country" Joe Biden. Oct 17 2019: "This afternoon, I'll be discussing Donald Trump's recent actions in Syria and how his erratic, impulsive decisions endanger our troops and make us all less safe" Oct 25 2021: The U.S. military carried out an airstrike against an Iranian-backed militia stronghold in Syria Thursday, a senior official told Fox News. In the first known military action by President Biden, multiple facilities were struck by American F15 fighter jets that targeted Iraqi border-based Shia militia groups, Kait’ib Hezbollah and Kait’ib Sayyid al Shuhada.
" https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-hits-iranian-backed-forces-in-syrian-in-defensive-airstrike
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xEnzo caught lying again and again. Just can't help himself. I'm still waiting one post from me- and from the other FWIW- that proves what you alleged earlier..
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xMinneapolis looks to hire MORE police officers after defunding the police: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/minneapolis-spend-64m-recruit-police-officers-75875382"Minneapolis is planning to spend $6.4 million to hire dozens of police officers, at a time when some City Council members and activist groups have been advocating to replace the police department following George Floyd’s death. The City Council voted unanimously Friday to approve the additional funding that police requested. The department says it only has 638 officers available to work — roughly 200 fewer than usual. An unprecedented number of officers quit or went on extended medical leave after Floyd’s death and the unrest that followed, which included the burning of a police precinct...
...more than 550 people shot, 80 murders mostly blacks in 2020..mostly peaceful protests, but ignore the burning private property and cars..
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minneapolis-resident-city-council-has-e2-80-98blood-on-their-hands-e2-80-99-for-defunding-police/vi-BB1dJqpL
Solution?
"“We have a policing system that doesn’t work for us and we need alternatives,” said Rachel Bean, who signed the petition Saturday. “I’m a social worker and I feel like we have lots of tools that we could try to create more community safety."
Yes send in the front line social workers..what could go wrong?
So there was no defunding just resignations and extended leave and now they're remedying that by hiring more police. Uh huh. So what exactly is the issue? Defund police bad. Hire more police bad. Enzo FTW. Deluded. Completely mind-fucked that you can put that spin on it. These officer are quitting because they had jack of the woke craziness. Crime soared immediately afterwards. Now the woke nutjobs need more money to fix a problem they caused. Wokeness. Its an Illness. Get Help. Enzo wrote: Minneapolis looks to hire MORE police officers after defunding the police:Simple question. In that article you posted were the police defunded? Yes or no? Because if you are illiterate, as your above response suggests you are, it is you that needs to seek help.
Even a retard like you could do a simple google search and come up with numerous hits that would have confirmed that Minneapolis cut the police budget by $8 million....here is just one, this time from on of your Left wing sources (to shut you up..) https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/10/us/minneapolis-police-funding.htmlAnd even if you were right-and you're not- then you've just confirmed what the wokes always do around election time: Treat Blacks as Useful Idiots. Once the Blacks have served their purpose, its business as usual for the woke Left.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xMinneapolis looks to hire MORE police officers after defunding the police: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/minneapolis-spend-64m-recruit-police-officers-75875382"Minneapolis is planning to spend $6.4 million to hire dozens of police officers, at a time when some City Council members and activist groups have been advocating to replace the police department following George Floyd’s death. The City Council voted unanimously Friday to approve the additional funding that police requested. The department says it only has 638 officers available to work — roughly 200 fewer than usual. An unprecedented number of officers quit or went on extended medical leave after Floyd’s death and the unrest that followed, which included the burning of a police precinct...
...more than 550 people shot, 80 murders mostly blacks in 2020..mostly peaceful protests, but ignore the burning private property and cars..
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minneapolis-resident-city-council-has-e2-80-98blood-on-their-hands-e2-80-99-for-defunding-police/vi-BB1dJqpL
Solution?
"“We have a policing system that doesn’t work for us and we need alternatives,” said Rachel Bean, who signed the petition Saturday. “I’m a social worker and I feel like we have lots of tools that we could try to create more community safety."
Yes send in the front line social workers..what could go wrong?
So there was no defunding just resignations and extended leave and now they're remedying that by hiring more police. Uh huh. So what exactly is the issue? Defund police bad. Hire more police bad. Enzo FTW. Deluded. Completely mind-fucked that you can put that spin on it. These officer are quitting because they had jack of the woke craziness. Crime soared immediately afterwards. Now the woke nutjobs need more money to fix a problem they caused. Wokeness. Its an Illness. Get Help. Wokeness is simply not being a c*nt to everyone else all the time, by being a little bit more understanding of someone else's differences. -PB Well you'd know so I'll take your word for it.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xMinneapolis looks to hire MORE police officers after defunding the police: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/minneapolis-spend-64m-recruit-police-officers-75875382"Minneapolis is planning to spend $6.4 million to hire dozens of police officers, at a time when some City Council members and activist groups have been advocating to replace the police department following George Floyd’s death. The City Council voted unanimously Friday to approve the additional funding that police requested. The department says it only has 638 officers available to work — roughly 200 fewer than usual. An unprecedented number of officers quit or went on extended medical leave after Floyd’s death and the unrest that followed, which included the burning of a police precinct...
...more than 550 people shot, 80 murders mostly blacks in 2020..mostly peaceful protests, but ignore the burning private property and cars..
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minneapolis-resident-city-council-has-e2-80-98blood-on-their-hands-e2-80-99-for-defunding-police/vi-BB1dJqpL
Solution?
"“We have a policing system that doesn’t work for us and we need alternatives,” said Rachel Bean, who signed the petition Saturday. “I’m a social worker and I feel like we have lots of tools that we could try to create more community safety."
Yes send in the front line social workers..what could go wrong?
So there was no defunding just resignations and extended leave and now they're remedying that by hiring more police. Uh huh. So what exactly is the issue? Defund police bad. Hire more police bad. Enzo FTW. Deluded. Completely mind-fucked that you can put that spin on it. These officer are quitting because they had jack of the woke craziness. Crime soared immediately afterwards. Now the woke nutjobs need more money to fix a problem they caused. Wokeness. Its an Illness. Get Help. Wokeness is simply not being a c*nt to everyone else all the time, by being a little bit more understanding of someone else's differences. -PB
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Enzo caught lying again and again. Just can't help himself.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xMinneapolis looks to hire MORE police officers after defunding the police: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/minneapolis-spend-64m-recruit-police-officers-75875382"Minneapolis is planning to spend $6.4 million to hire dozens of police officers, at a time when some City Council members and activist groups have been advocating to replace the police department following George Floyd’s death. The City Council voted unanimously Friday to approve the additional funding that police requested. The department says it only has 638 officers available to work — roughly 200 fewer than usual. An unprecedented number of officers quit or went on extended medical leave after Floyd’s death and the unrest that followed, which included the burning of a police precinct...
...more than 550 people shot, 80 murders mostly blacks in 2020..mostly peaceful protests, but ignore the burning private property and cars..
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minneapolis-resident-city-council-has-e2-80-98blood-on-their-hands-e2-80-99-for-defunding-police/vi-BB1dJqpL
Solution?
"“We have a policing system that doesn’t work for us and we need alternatives,” said Rachel Bean, who signed the petition Saturday. “I’m a social worker and I feel like we have lots of tools that we could try to create more community safety."
Yes send in the front line social workers..what could go wrong?
So there was no defunding just resignations and extended leave and now they're remedying that by hiring more police. Uh huh. So what exactly is the issue? Defund police bad. Hire more police bad. Enzo FTW. Deluded. Completely mind-fucked that you can put that spin on it. These officer are quitting because they had jack of the woke craziness. Crime soared immediately afterwards. Now the woke nutjobs need more money to fix a problem they caused. Wokeness. Its an Illness. Get Help. Enzo wrote: Minneapolis looks to hire MORE police officers after defunding the police:Simple question. In that article you posted were the police defunded? Yes or no? Because if you are illiterate, as your above response suggests you are, it is you that needs to seek help.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xMinneapolis looks to hire MORE police officers after defunding the police: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/minneapolis-spend-64m-recruit-police-officers-75875382"Minneapolis is planning to spend $6.4 million to hire dozens of police officers, at a time when some City Council members and activist groups have been advocating to replace the police department following George Floyd’s death. The City Council voted unanimously Friday to approve the additional funding that police requested. The department says it only has 638 officers available to work — roughly 200 fewer than usual. An unprecedented number of officers quit or went on extended medical leave after Floyd’s death and the unrest that followed, which included the burning of a police precinct...
...more than 550 people shot, 80 murders mostly blacks in 2020..mostly peaceful protests, but ignore the burning private property and cars..
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minneapolis-resident-city-council-has-e2-80-98blood-on-their-hands-e2-80-99-for-defunding-police/vi-BB1dJqpL
Solution?
"“We have a policing system that doesn’t work for us and we need alternatives,” said Rachel Bean, who signed the petition Saturday. “I’m a social worker and I feel like we have lots of tools that we could try to create more community safety."
Yes send in the front line social workers..what could go wrong?
So there was no defunding just resignations and extended leave and now they're remedying that by hiring more police. Uh huh. So what exactly is the issue? Defund police bad. Hire more police bad. Enzo FTW. Deluded. Completely mind-fucked that you can put that spin on it. These officer are quitting because they had jack of the woke craziness. Crime soared immediately afterwards. Now the woke nutjobs need more money to fix a problem they caused. Wokeness. Its an Illness. Get Help.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]It's also ridiculous for people to defend Trump's speech that day (the exact wording of which can be argued either way) but ignore the premeditated MONTHS of false claims about the election. That's the cause of this. Not just one speech by a bunch of desperate clowns hiding behind glass pretending to be men of the people. I doubt even Enzo or Rusty would say they believe that tens of thousands of votes in various states were stolen or faked. That's why rusty wasn't here for 2 months. All normal headed people know it was a lie and saw it coming, mainly because Trump and his people told us they were going to do it for crying out loud aha Republicans humoured him, allowing him his "harmless day in court" (60odd times) and this, and what's to come, is the direct result of these blatant lies. To turn around and say, well some of the mob were just there for a laugh (true) and that other protests in history have had violent elements (true) and ignore the LIES that happened over the last few months that led huge chunks of the country to believe an election was stolen is idiotic. Being willing to defend that lying and attempts to bring into question the democratic process just because that "side" or "man" is on your side when your feelings are hurt and you're scared that all boys will be girls soon, men can marry men, women can have abortions and that beating a woman is seen as bad even though she belittled you for years is just pathetic. This was 4 years in the making, not 4 months, culminating in misinformation, disinformation and withholding of information in the lead up to the election. Why does the world most technologically-advanced nation insist on routine mail in voting and no ID even when there is no pandemic- when 80% of Europe doesn't? Idiot. Every single audit showed vote counts on the electronic machines matched the paper copies that were printed off when you voted and handed them over. Barr said there was nothing wrong with the election. Multiple Republican governors said there was nothing wrong with the election. Every independent organisation said there was nothing wrong with the election. Postal votes were signature matched. Where signatures didn't match a Republican, a Democrat and an independent would scrutinise the envelopes and accept it or not. There were actually more steps than this but it varies across states. Trump spouted over 20 000 lies during his 4 year term and you talk about misinformation. Meanwhile nearly 400 000 people are dead and still the orange fucking clown refuses to believe it's serious. There is something seriously wrong with you. You need to get off whatever you're on. Moron. Why does the rest of the civilized world have voter ID and the US does not?. Why does the rest of the civilized world put terms and conditions on early voting but the US does not? Why do the Democrats insist on them? Spare me the "voter suppression" bullshit. If there were voter suppression of blacks- and it IS blacks the Democrats tell us are having their votes suppressed- why do blacks and whites vote at about the same rates? Why do Asians and Hispanic vote at half the rate? That's quite a late to reply to this Enzo. In case you need a further update Trump's own people said the election was above board. Not that it matter to you. And in case you haven't been watching the news of late Biden was inaugurated an the 20th of January 2020. All of Trump's objections fizzled because, you, know, no evidence. The issues still remain: why do the Democrats insist on no voter ID and unrestricted early voting? The rest of the civilized democracies have these things. If they have nothing to hide, why don't the Democrats want to move alongside every other democracy? Why don't you ask the Republicans that are in charge and have the same rules? Maybe they could dumb it down enough for you to understand. Or see if this helps your dumb arse. https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_statehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_Identification_laws_in_the_United_StatesThe vast majority of voter ID laws in the United States target only voter impersonation, of which there are only 31 documented cases in the United States from the 2000–2014 period.[63] According to PolitiFact, "in-person voter fraud—the kind targeted by the ID law—remains extremely rare".[12] According to the Associated Press, the New York Times, NPR, CNBC, the Guardian and FactCheck.Org the available research and evidence point to the type of fraud that would be prevented by voter ID laws as "very rare" or "extremely rare".[64][65][66][67][68][69][70] PolitiFact finds the suggestion that "voter fraud is rampant" false, giving it its "Pants on Fire" rating.[12] Most cases of alleged voter fraud involving dead voters have been shown to be a result of incorrect matching of voter rolls and death records, such as when someone died after they voted rather than before.[71] Writing in 2009, Harvard political scientist Stephen Ansolabehere noted that despite the common belief "that fraud occurs at least somewhat often in elections … social scientists have been unable to develop unambiguous measures of the incidence of fraud, and legal cases find very little hard evidence on the matter."[72] In a 2012 analysis, News21 of the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism surveyed thousands of election officials in 50 states regarding all instances of fraud relating to elections since 2000, and concluded that in-person voter impersonation is virtually non-existent, amounting to one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.[73]
I don't accept opinions from leftist media such as AP, NYT, CNN, NPR, CNBC, The Guardian, and Factcheck.org because as I've seen too many examples when the numbers don't fit their preferred narrative, they introduce a "But" to cast doubt on facts they don't like. They also tell outright lies. LoL. Absolutely pointless talking to you. Why? Because I read more broadly than you? All of your sources are rated as Left Leaning. Get out of your woke bubble and read more broadly, and you might have something credible and non-hypocritical to say. Breitbart and Infowars are not good examples of reading more widely. See also OOAN. One example of me posting source links to them will do. I'll wait.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
That was awesome. But there's plenty of people who want to defund NASA. Saying money should be spent on the homeless . But they don't see nothing wrong with the military complex America has
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Proof America, despite its faults and divisions, is still a country capable of incredible achievements. This footage is just unbelievable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4czjS9h4Fpg&lc=Ugw2mATE5mg83cymUMV4AaABAg.9K5_S0zTuzA9K5jS19fNeU
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+xHow good is privitisation? Damn socialists! -PB Sadly nothing will change.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xRemember the good old days when rusty was the biggest loon on here? I remember when rusty was a reasonable poster and there were other nutty posters. If one disappears there's always another that gets sucked into that voidl Rusty was a great poster before he went all weird. Same with stefcep I mean enzo Blimey how far back are you and McJules talking? 5 years maybe? He was good in a way that he had classic Liberal views on taxation etc that you could respectfully disagree with on rather than the full on culture war shit
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
How good is privitisation? Damn socialists! -PB
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xRemember the good old days when rusty was the biggest loon on here? I remember when rusty was a reasonable poster and there were other nutty posters. If one disappears there's always another that gets sucked into that voidl Rusty was a great poster before he went all weird. Same with stefcep I mean enzo Blimey how far back are you and McJules talking?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xRemember the good old days when rusty was the biggest loon on here? I remember when rusty was a reasonable poster and there were other nutty posters. If one disappears there's always another that gets sucked into that voidl Rusty was a great poster before he went all weird. Same with stefcep I mean enzo
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xRemember the good old days when rusty was the biggest loon on here? I remember when rusty was a reasonable poster and there were other nutty posters. If one disappears there's always another that gets sucked into that voidl
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe state’s prevailing social Darwinism was expressed most succinctly by the mayor of Colorado City, who accused his constituents – trapped in near sub-zero temperatures and complaining about lack of heat, electricity and drinkable water – of being the “lazy” products of a “socialist government”, adding “I’m sick and tired of people looking for a damn handout!” and predicting “only the strong will survive and the weak will perish”."
Hahah fucking America.
-PB
USA, USA!! Jesus when did they lose all empathy? This is what happens when people got brain washed Into thinking that helping others is socialism
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe state’s prevailing social Darwinism was expressed most succinctly by the mayor of Colorado City, who accused his constituents – trapped in near sub-zero temperatures and complaining about lack of heat, electricity and drinkable water – of being the “lazy” products of a “socialist government”, adding “I’m sick and tired of people looking for a damn handout!” and predicting “only the strong will survive and the weak will perish”."
Hahah fucking America.
-PB
USA, USA!!
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
The state’s prevailing social Darwinism was expressed most succinctly by the mayor of Colorado City, who accused his constituents – trapped in near sub-zero temperatures and complaining about lack of heat, electricity and drinkable water – of being the “lazy” products of a “socialist government”, adding “I’m sick and tired of people looking for a damn handout!” and predicting “only the strong will survive and the weak will perish”."
Hahah fucking America.
-PB
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Remember the good old days when rusty was the biggest loon on here?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMinneapolis looks to hire MORE police officers after defunding the police: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/minneapolis-spend-64m-recruit-police-officers-75875382"Minneapolis is planning to spend $6.4 million to hire dozens of police officers, at a time when some City Council members and activist groups have been advocating to replace the police department following George Floyd’s death. The City Council voted unanimously Friday to approve the additional funding that police requested. The department says it only has 638 officers available to work — roughly 200 fewer than usual. An unprecedented number of officers quit or went on extended medical leave after Floyd’s death and the unrest that followed, which included the burning of a police precinct...
...more than 550 people shot, 80 murders mostly blacks in 2020..mostly peaceful protests, but ignore the burning private property and cars..
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minneapolis-resident-city-council-has-e2-80-98blood-on-their-hands-e2-80-99-for-defunding-police/vi-BB1dJqpL
Solution?
"“We have a policing system that doesn’t work for us and we need alternatives,” said Rachel Bean, who signed the petition Saturday. “I’m a social worker and I feel like we have lots of tools that we could try to create more community safety."
Yes send in the front line social workers..what could go wrong?
So there was no defunding just resignations and extended leave and now they're remedying that by hiring more police. Uh huh. So what exactly is the issue? Defund police bad. Hire more police bad. Enzo FTW.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]It's also ridiculous for people to defend Trump's speech that day (the exact wording of which can be argued either way) but ignore the premeditated MONTHS of false claims about the election. That's the cause of this. Not just one speech by a bunch of desperate clowns hiding behind glass pretending to be men of the people. I doubt even Enzo or Rusty would say they believe that tens of thousands of votes in various states were stolen or faked. That's why rusty wasn't here for 2 months. All normal headed people know it was a lie and saw it coming, mainly because Trump and his people told us they were going to do it for crying out loud aha Republicans humoured him, allowing him his "harmless day in court" (60odd times) and this, and what's to come, is the direct result of these blatant lies. To turn around and say, well some of the mob were just there for a laugh (true) and that other protests in history have had violent elements (true) and ignore the LIES that happened over the last few months that led huge chunks of the country to believe an election was stolen is idiotic. Being willing to defend that lying and attempts to bring into question the democratic process just because that "side" or "man" is on your side when your feelings are hurt and you're scared that all boys will be girls soon, men can marry men, women can have abortions and that beating a woman is seen as bad even though she belittled you for years is just pathetic. This was 4 years in the making, not 4 months, culminating in misinformation, disinformation and withholding of information in the lead up to the election. Why does the world most technologically-advanced nation insist on routine mail in voting and no ID even when there is no pandemic- when 80% of Europe doesn't? Idiot. Every single audit showed vote counts on the electronic machines matched the paper copies that were printed off when you voted and handed them over. Barr said there was nothing wrong with the election. Multiple Republican governors said there was nothing wrong with the election. Every independent organisation said there was nothing wrong with the election. Postal votes were signature matched. Where signatures didn't match a Republican, a Democrat and an independent would scrutinise the envelopes and accept it or not. There were actually more steps than this but it varies across states. Trump spouted over 20 000 lies during his 4 year term and you talk about misinformation. Meanwhile nearly 400 000 people are dead and still the orange fucking clown refuses to believe it's serious. There is something seriously wrong with you. You need to get off whatever you're on. Moron. Why does the rest of the civilized world have voter ID and the US does not?. Why does the rest of the civilized world put terms and conditions on early voting but the US does not? Why do the Democrats insist on them? Spare me the "voter suppression" bullshit. If there were voter suppression of blacks- and it IS blacks the Democrats tell us are having their votes suppressed- why do blacks and whites vote at about the same rates? Why do Asians and Hispanic vote at half the rate? That's quite a late to reply to this Enzo. In case you need a further update Trump's own people said the election was above board. Not that it matter to you. And in case you haven't been watching the news of late Biden was inaugurated an the 20th of January 2020. All of Trump's objections fizzled because, you, know, no evidence. The issues still remain: why do the Democrats insist on no voter ID and unrestricted early voting? The rest of the civilized democracies have these things. If they have nothing to hide, why don't the Democrats want to move alongside every other democracy? Why don't you ask the Republicans that are in charge and have the same rules? Maybe they could dumb it down enough for you to understand. Or see if this helps your dumb arse. https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_statehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_Identification_laws_in_the_United_StatesThe vast majority of voter ID laws in the United States target only voter impersonation, of which there are only 31 documented cases in the United States from the 2000–2014 period.[63] According to PolitiFact, "in-person voter fraud—the kind targeted by the ID law—remains extremely rare".[12] According to the Associated Press, the New York Times, NPR, CNBC, the Guardian and FactCheck.Org the available research and evidence point to the type of fraud that would be prevented by voter ID laws as "very rare" or "extremely rare".[64][65][66][67][68][69][70] PolitiFact finds the suggestion that "voter fraud is rampant" false, giving it its "Pants on Fire" rating.[12] Most cases of alleged voter fraud involving dead voters have been shown to be a result of incorrect matching of voter rolls and death records, such as when someone died after they voted rather than before.[71] Writing in 2009, Harvard political scientist Stephen Ansolabehere noted that despite the common belief "that fraud occurs at least somewhat often in elections … social scientists have been unable to develop unambiguous measures of the incidence of fraud, and legal cases find very little hard evidence on the matter."[72] In a 2012 analysis, News21 of the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism surveyed thousands of election officials in 50 states regarding all instances of fraud relating to elections since 2000, and concluded that in-person voter impersonation is virtually non-existent, amounting to one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.[73]
I don't accept opinions from leftist media such as AP, NYT, CNN, NPR, CNBC, The Guardian, and Factcheck.org because as I've seen too many examples when the numbers don't fit their preferred narrative, they introduce a "But" to cast doubt on facts they don't like. They also tell outright lies. LoL. Absolutely pointless talking to you. Why? Because I read more broadly than you? All of your sources are rated as Left Leaning. Get out of your woke bubble and read more broadly, and you might have something credible and non-hypocritical to say. Breitbart and Infowars are not good examples of reading more widely. See also OOAN.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xLook at this MSM shill Enzo sharing all of these lamestream media cuck articles. -PB Exactly. BBC, ABC, MSN. There's no depths he won't sink to.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Look at this MSM shill Enzo sharing all of these lamestream media cuck articles. -PB
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Minneapolis looks to hire MORE police officers after defunding the police: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/minneapolis-spend-64m-recruit-police-officers-75875382"Minneapolis is planning to spend $6.4 million to hire dozens of police officers, at a time when some City Council members and activist groups have been advocating to replace the police department following George Floyd’s death. The City Council voted unanimously Friday to approve the additional funding that police requested. The department says it only has 638 officers available to work — roughly 200 fewer than usual. An unprecedented number of officers quit or went on extended medical leave after Floyd’s death and the unrest that followed, which included the burning of a police precinct...
...more than 550 people shot, 80 murders mostly blacks in 2020..mostly peaceful protests, but ignore the burning private property and cars..
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minneapolis-resident-city-council-has-e2-80-98blood-on-their-hands-e2-80-99-for-defunding-police/vi-BB1dJqpL
Solution?
"“We have a policing system that doesn’t work for us and we need alternatives,” said Rachel Bean, who signed the petition Saturday. “I’m a social worker and I feel like we have lots of tools that we could try to create more community safety."
Yes send in the front line social workers..what could go wrong?
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]It's also ridiculous for people to defend Trump's speech that day (the exact wording of which can be argued either way) but ignore the premeditated MONTHS of false claims about the election. That's the cause of this. Not just one speech by a bunch of desperate clowns hiding behind glass pretending to be men of the people. I doubt even Enzo or Rusty would say they believe that tens of thousands of votes in various states were stolen or faked. That's why rusty wasn't here for 2 months. All normal headed people know it was a lie and saw it coming, mainly because Trump and his people told us they were going to do it for crying out loud aha Republicans humoured him, allowing him his "harmless day in court" (60odd times) and this, and what's to come, is the direct result of these blatant lies. To turn around and say, well some of the mob were just there for a laugh (true) and that other protests in history have had violent elements (true) and ignore the LIES that happened over the last few months that led huge chunks of the country to believe an election was stolen is idiotic. Being willing to defend that lying and attempts to bring into question the democratic process just because that "side" or "man" is on your side when your feelings are hurt and you're scared that all boys will be girls soon, men can marry men, women can have abortions and that beating a woman is seen as bad even though she belittled you for years is just pathetic. This was 4 years in the making, not 4 months, culminating in misinformation, disinformation and withholding of information in the lead up to the election. Why does the world most technologically-advanced nation insist on routine mail in voting and no ID even when there is no pandemic- when 80% of Europe doesn't? Idiot. Every single audit showed vote counts on the electronic machines matched the paper copies that were printed off when you voted and handed them over. Barr said there was nothing wrong with the election. Multiple Republican governors said there was nothing wrong with the election. Every independent organisation said there was nothing wrong with the election. Postal votes were signature matched. Where signatures didn't match a Republican, a Democrat and an independent would scrutinise the envelopes and accept it or not. There were actually more steps than this but it varies across states. Trump spouted over 20 000 lies during his 4 year term and you talk about misinformation. Meanwhile nearly 400 000 people are dead and still the orange fucking clown refuses to believe it's serious. There is something seriously wrong with you. You need to get off whatever you're on. Moron. Why does the rest of the civilized world have voter ID and the US does not?. Why does the rest of the civilized world put terms and conditions on early voting but the US does not? Why do the Democrats insist on them? Spare me the "voter suppression" bullshit. If there were voter suppression of blacks- and it IS blacks the Democrats tell us are having their votes suppressed- why do blacks and whites vote at about the same rates? Why do Asians and Hispanic vote at half the rate? That's quite a late to reply to this Enzo. In case you need a further update Trump's own people said the election was above board. Not that it matter to you. And in case you haven't been watching the news of late Biden was inaugurated an the 20th of January 2020. All of Trump's objections fizzled because, you, know, no evidence. The issues still remain: why do the Democrats insist on no voter ID and unrestricted early voting? The rest of the civilized democracies have these things. If they have nothing to hide, why don't the Democrats want to move alongside every other democracy? Why don't you ask the Republicans that are in charge and have the same rules? Maybe they could dumb it down enough for you to understand. Or see if this helps your dumb arse. https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_statehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_Identification_laws_in_the_United_StatesThe vast majority of voter ID laws in the United States target only voter impersonation, of which there are only 31 documented cases in the United States from the 2000–2014 period.[63] According to PolitiFact, "in-person voter fraud—the kind targeted by the ID law—remains extremely rare".[12] According to the Associated Press, the New York Times, NPR, CNBC, the Guardian and FactCheck.Org the available research and evidence point to the type of fraud that would be prevented by voter ID laws as "very rare" or "extremely rare".[64][65][66][67][68][69][70] PolitiFact finds the suggestion that "voter fraud is rampant" false, giving it its "Pants on Fire" rating.[12] Most cases of alleged voter fraud involving dead voters have been shown to be a result of incorrect matching of voter rolls and death records, such as when someone died after they voted rather than before.[71] Writing in 2009, Harvard political scientist Stephen Ansolabehere noted that despite the common belief "that fraud occurs at least somewhat often in elections … social scientists have been unable to develop unambiguous measures of the incidence of fraud, and legal cases find very little hard evidence on the matter."[72] In a 2012 analysis, News21 of the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism surveyed thousands of election officials in 50 states regarding all instances of fraud relating to elections since 2000, and concluded that in-person voter impersonation is virtually non-existent, amounting to one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.[73]
I don't accept opinions from leftist media such as AP, NYT, CNN, NPR, CNBC, The Guardian, and Factcheck.org because as I've seen too many examples when the numbers don't fit their preferred narrative, they introduce a "But" to cast doubt on facts they don't like. They also tell outright lies. LoL. Absolutely pointless talking to you. Why? Because I read more broadly than you? All of your sources are rated as Left Leaning. Get out of your woke bubble and read more broadly, and you might have something credible and non-hypocritical to say. Lol not a shred of irony there One example will do...
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]It's also ridiculous for people to defend Trump's speech that day (the exact wording of which can be argued either way) but ignore the premeditated MONTHS of false claims about the election. That's the cause of this. Not just one speech by a bunch of desperate clowns hiding behind glass pretending to be men of the people. I doubt even Enzo or Rusty would say they believe that tens of thousands of votes in various states were stolen or faked. That's why rusty wasn't here for 2 months. All normal headed people know it was a lie and saw it coming, mainly because Trump and his people told us they were going to do it for crying out loud aha Republicans humoured him, allowing him his "harmless day in court" (60odd times) and this, and what's to come, is the direct result of these blatant lies. To turn around and say, well some of the mob were just there for a laugh (true) and that other protests in history have had violent elements (true) and ignore the LIES that happened over the last few months that led huge chunks of the country to believe an election was stolen is idiotic. Being willing to defend that lying and attempts to bring into question the democratic process just because that "side" or "man" is on your side when your feelings are hurt and you're scared that all boys will be girls soon, men can marry men, women can have abortions and that beating a woman is seen as bad even though she belittled you for years is just pathetic. This was 4 years in the making, not 4 months, culminating in misinformation, disinformation and withholding of information in the lead up to the election. Why does the world most technologically-advanced nation insist on routine mail in voting and no ID even when there is no pandemic- when 80% of Europe doesn't? Idiot. Every single audit showed vote counts on the electronic machines matched the paper copies that were printed off when you voted and handed them over. Barr said there was nothing wrong with the election. Multiple Republican governors said there was nothing wrong with the election. Every independent organisation said there was nothing wrong with the election. Postal votes were signature matched. Where signatures didn't match a Republican, a Democrat and an independent would scrutinise the envelopes and accept it or not. There were actually more steps than this but it varies across states. Trump spouted over 20 000 lies during his 4 year term and you talk about misinformation. Meanwhile nearly 400 000 people are dead and still the orange fucking clown refuses to believe it's serious. There is something seriously wrong with you. You need to get off whatever you're on. Moron. Why does the rest of the civilized world have voter ID and the US does not?. Why does the rest of the civilized world put terms and conditions on early voting but the US does not? Why do the Democrats insist on them? Spare me the "voter suppression" bullshit. If there were voter suppression of blacks- and it IS blacks the Democrats tell us are having their votes suppressed- why do blacks and whites vote at about the same rates? Why do Asians and Hispanic vote at half the rate? That's quite a late to reply to this Enzo. In case you need a further update Trump's own people said the election was above board. Not that it matter to you. And in case you haven't been watching the news of late Biden was inaugurated an the 20th of January 2020. All of Trump's objections fizzled because, you, know, no evidence. The issues still remain: why do the Democrats insist on no voter ID and unrestricted early voting? The rest of the civilized democracies have these things. If they have nothing to hide, why don't the Democrats want to move alongside every other democracy? Why don't you ask the Republicans that are in charge and have the same rules? Maybe they could dumb it down enough for you to understand. Or see if this helps your dumb arse. https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_statehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_Identification_laws_in_the_United_StatesThe vast majority of voter ID laws in the United States target only voter impersonation, of which there are only 31 documented cases in the United States from the 2000–2014 period.[63] According to PolitiFact, "in-person voter fraud—the kind targeted by the ID law—remains extremely rare".[12] According to the Associated Press, the New York Times, NPR, CNBC, the Guardian and FactCheck.Org the available research and evidence point to the type of fraud that would be prevented by voter ID laws as "very rare" or "extremely rare".[64][65][66][67][68][69][70] PolitiFact finds the suggestion that "voter fraud is rampant" false, giving it its "Pants on Fire" rating.[12] Most cases of alleged voter fraud involving dead voters have been shown to be a result of incorrect matching of voter rolls and death records, such as when someone died after they voted rather than before.[71] Writing in 2009, Harvard political scientist Stephen Ansolabehere noted that despite the common belief "that fraud occurs at least somewhat often in elections … social scientists have been unable to develop unambiguous measures of the incidence of fraud, and legal cases find very little hard evidence on the matter."[72] In a 2012 analysis, News21 of the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism surveyed thousands of election officials in 50 states regarding all instances of fraud relating to elections since 2000, and concluded that in-person voter impersonation is virtually non-existent, amounting to one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.[73]
I don't accept opinions from leftist media such as AP, NYT, CNN, NPR, CNBC, The Guardian, and Factcheck.org because as I've seen too many examples when the numbers don't fit their preferred narrative, they introduce a "But" to cast doubt on facts they don't like. They also tell outright lies. LoL. Absolutely pointless talking to you. Why? Because I read more broadly than you? All of your sources are rated as Left Leaning. Get out of your woke bubble and read more broadly, and you might have something credible and non-hypocritical to say. Lol not a shred of irony there
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]It's also ridiculous for people to defend Trump's speech that day (the exact wording of which can be argued either way) but ignore the premeditated MONTHS of false claims about the election. That's the cause of this. Not just one speech by a bunch of desperate clowns hiding behind glass pretending to be men of the people. I doubt even Enzo or Rusty would say they believe that tens of thousands of votes in various states were stolen or faked. That's why rusty wasn't here for 2 months. All normal headed people know it was a lie and saw it coming, mainly because Trump and his people told us they were going to do it for crying out loud aha Republicans humoured him, allowing him his "harmless day in court" (60odd times) and this, and what's to come, is the direct result of these blatant lies. To turn around and say, well some of the mob were just there for a laugh (true) and that other protests in history have had violent elements (true) and ignore the LIES that happened over the last few months that led huge chunks of the country to believe an election was stolen is idiotic. Being willing to defend that lying and attempts to bring into question the democratic process just because that "side" or "man" is on your side when your feelings are hurt and you're scared that all boys will be girls soon, men can marry men, women can have abortions and that beating a woman is seen as bad even though she belittled you for years is just pathetic. This was 4 years in the making, not 4 months, culminating in misinformation, disinformation and withholding of information in the lead up to the election. Why does the world most technologically-advanced nation insist on routine mail in voting and no ID even when there is no pandemic- when 80% of Europe doesn't? Idiot. Every single audit showed vote counts on the electronic machines matched the paper copies that were printed off when you voted and handed them over. Barr said there was nothing wrong with the election. Multiple Republican governors said there was nothing wrong with the election. Every independent organisation said there was nothing wrong with the election. Postal votes were signature matched. Where signatures didn't match a Republican, a Democrat and an independent would scrutinise the envelopes and accept it or not. There were actually more steps than this but it varies across states. Trump spouted over 20 000 lies during his 4 year term and you talk about misinformation. Meanwhile nearly 400 000 people are dead and still the orange fucking clown refuses to believe it's serious. There is something seriously wrong with you. You need to get off whatever you're on. Moron. Why does the rest of the civilized world have voter ID and the US does not?. Why does the rest of the civilized world put terms and conditions on early voting but the US does not? Why do the Democrats insist on them? Spare me the "voter suppression" bullshit. If there were voter suppression of blacks- and it IS blacks the Democrats tell us are having their votes suppressed- why do blacks and whites vote at about the same rates? Why do Asians and Hispanic vote at half the rate? That's quite a late to reply to this Enzo. In case you need a further update Trump's own people said the election was above board. Not that it matter to you. And in case you haven't been watching the news of late Biden was inaugurated an the 20th of January 2020. All of Trump's objections fizzled because, you, know, no evidence. The issues still remain: why do the Democrats insist on no voter ID and unrestricted early voting? The rest of the civilized democracies have these things. If they have nothing to hide, why don't the Democrats want to move alongside every other democracy? Why don't you ask the Republicans that are in charge and have the same rules? Maybe they could dumb it down enough for you to understand. Or see if this helps your dumb arse. https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_statehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_Identification_laws_in_the_United_StatesThe vast majority of voter ID laws in the United States target only voter impersonation, of which there are only 31 documented cases in the United States from the 2000–2014 period.[63] According to PolitiFact, "in-person voter fraud—the kind targeted by the ID law—remains extremely rare".[12] According to the Associated Press, the New York Times, NPR, CNBC, the Guardian and FactCheck.Org the available research and evidence point to the type of fraud that would be prevented by voter ID laws as "very rare" or "extremely rare".[64][65][66][67][68][69][70] PolitiFact finds the suggestion that "voter fraud is rampant" false, giving it its "Pants on Fire" rating.[12] Most cases of alleged voter fraud involving dead voters have been shown to be a result of incorrect matching of voter rolls and death records, such as when someone died after they voted rather than before.[71] Writing in 2009, Harvard political scientist Stephen Ansolabehere noted that despite the common belief "that fraud occurs at least somewhat often in elections … social scientists have been unable to develop unambiguous measures of the incidence of fraud, and legal cases find very little hard evidence on the matter."[72] In a 2012 analysis, News21 of the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism surveyed thousands of election officials in 50 states regarding all instances of fraud relating to elections since 2000, and concluded that in-person voter impersonation is virtually non-existent, amounting to one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.[73]
I don't accept opinions from leftist media such as AP, NYT, CNN, NPR, CNBC, The Guardian, and Factcheck.org because as I've seen too many examples when the numbers don't fit their preferred narrative, they introduce a "But" to cast doubt on facts they don't like. They also tell outright lies. LoL. Absolutely pointless talking to you. Why? Because I read more broadly than you? All of your sources are rated as Left Leaning. Get out of your woke bubble and read more broadly, and you might have something credible and non-hypocritical to say.
|
|
|