I like how you assume to know what I'm thinking and speak on my behalf. It comes across as very smug ;)

So apparently Trump is going to fight a Bear...... :-s :shock: :lol:



Donald Trump has announced plans to fight a bear in Mexico on September 11th. (AP Photo/Dennis System)
In an interview today with Fox News, Presidential nominee Donald Trump has accepted a challenge by the The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) to fight a bear in Mexico next month.

Trump told Fox News that the fight will take place on September 11th, commemorating the 14th anniversary of the September 11 attacks.

“As President, you won’t ever see me back down from a fight,” Trump said. “After I destroy that bear, you will all finally see what I see on a daily basis; that America is by far the greatest country in the world.”

The fight will take place at the Mexican Coliseum in Mexico City and feature Banjo the Grizzly Bear, who weighs in at 190lbs and is 6ft tall. In comparison, Trump’s height is 6 feet, 2 inches and weighs approximately 198 lbs.

“What can I say, Trump loves America,” Paul Horner, one of Trump’s spokesman told NBC News. “A man who will fight a bear in Mexico, wow, what more do you want in a President?”


“I hope the bear eats that racist motherf*cker,” Ricardo Alvarez of the the NCLR told reporters. “Trump is rallying his supporters around a narrative of nationalistic pride, collective frustration, and dehumanizing language regarding persons of color and women, and this should not be a platform that the American people embrace. The last thing America needs is a President that will divide the country further with more hate and racism. If Trump gets eaten it would truly prove that there is a higher power out there that is looking out for us, ridding the world of evil.”

The reason for the challenge comes after statements made by Trump just weeks ago about the Hispanic community.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists,” Trump said. “We have drug dealers coming across, we have rapists, we have killers, we have murderers.”

Ironically, those comments came shortly after announcing that he will win the Latino vote if nominated for the Republican candidate for President.

“I have a great relationship with the Mexican people. I have many people working for me – look at the job in Washington – I have many legal immigrants working with me. And many of them come from Mexico. They love me, I love them,” the 2016 GOP contender said in an interview with NBC News. “And I’ll tell you something, if I get the nomination, I’ll win the Latino vote.”

Trump finished his interview with Fox News encouraging everyone to watch the fight on pay-per-view next month.

“That bear doesn’t have a chance, just like all the illegals in this country when I become President,” Trump said. “You all have asked me how I plan on deporting 11 million Mexicans?” Trump laughs, “The answer is simple… Juan by Juan.”

http://nbc.com.co/donald-trump-accepts-challenge-to-fight-bear-in-mexico/

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum recently appeared on Real Time with Bill Maher. He denied the consensus on man-made climate change. It’s what he does. He’s a denier.


To support his claim that the 97% consensus isn’t real, Santorum said “The head of the U.N. IPC [sic] said that number was pulled out of thin air.” Rick Santorum is wrong.

He’s almost certainly referring to Richard Tol, who actually said that the 97% figure was pulled out of thin air. Richard Tol was one of the “lead authors” of the latest IPCC reports — one of over 680 lead authors of the latest IPCC reports. Richard Tol contributed to one chapter out of three reports: chapter 10 of working group II: “Key economic sectors and services.” He was one of 8 lead authors on that one chapter of one of the three IPCC reports: the one about economic sectors and services. You see, Richard Tol is not a climate scientist. He’s a professor of economics at Sussex University, and of “the Economics of Climate Change” at Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. He’s an economist.

Richard Tol isn’t the head of the U.N. IPCC. Where Rick Santorum got that idea? I don’t know; maybe he pulled it out of his ass.

Out of over 680 lead authors, Rick Santorum managed to find 1 of 8 lead authors on one chapter in three massive reports who dismisses the 97% consensus — then told America that he was “head of the U.N. IPC” (it’s IPCC, not IPC). Richard Tol damn sure ain’t “head of the U.N. IPC [sic].”

Santorum went on to say that the 97% consensus was based on a survey of 77 scientists. Rick Santorum is wrong again. He’s probably referring to the study by Doran (2009), which found 75 of 77 actual climate scientists endorsed the consensus view. But the consensus comes from many studies, not just one survey, starting with Oreskes 2004, in which, out of 928 scientific research papers about climate, none disagreed with the consensus view. Cook et al. (2013) found that of 4,014 climate science research papers, 97% which stated a position endorsed the consensus view, and among the 10,356 scientists who authored those 4014 papers, 98.4% endorsed the consensus view.

But misstating “facts” is the kind of thing we expect from Rick Santorum. Rather than do some of the work required actually to learn about the subject, he’ll do nothing more than listen to those who tell him what he wants ot hear, then lie to America so he can push his political agenda. I’d rather have a president who was willing to get to the bottom of things, to find out the real deal, than one who’s intellectually lazy and so agenda-driven that he’ll spout drivel about an issue as important as global warming.

Can anyone from the racist party beat Hillary though?

I think its time for a woman president and Hillary will win

Thought it was pretty ludicrous that donald trump could be president. But it looks like he has a real chance now. may god have mercy on us all.

Bernie Sanders is good but I'll settle for Hillary
as long as the republicans dont get in else we'll be set for another decade of war somewhere

Ben Carson - I am amazed that a guy who is intelligent enough to be a neurosurgeon can be so off the rails mental when it comes to everything else...

he's paid well to play uncle Tom

He's a lying fuckwit with unworkable thought bubbles who can't keep his platform straight without resorting to hyperpopulist drivel..

Without platitudes and generalisations

Without platitudes and generalisations, can anyone state why they're so vehemently anti-Trump?

Low-Effort Thought Promotes Political Conservatism

Abstract
The authors test the hypothesis that low-effort thought promotes political conservatism. In Study 1, alcohol intoxication was measured among bar patrons; as blood alcohol level increased, so did political conservatism (controlling for sex, education, and political identification). In Study 2, participants under cognitive load reported more conservative attitudes than their no-load counterparts. In Study 3, time pressure increased participants’ endorsement of conservative terms. In Study 4, participants considering political terms in a cursory manner endorsed conservative terms more than those asked to cogitate; an indicator of effortful thought (recognition memory) partially mediated the relationship between processing effort and conservatism. Together these data suggest that political conservatism may be a process consequence of low-effort thought; when effortful, deliberate thought is disengaged, endorsement of conservative ideology increases.
http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/03/16/0146167212439213.abstract