Well no. 

 If i linked to Fox which also ran the story, you would have dismissed it as Murdoch. Rag...same with the NYT article earlier-there were other sources I could have quoted 

 That was deliberate.

Its YOUR preferred media.  You can' t wiggle out of it, dismissing it as right wing nut jobs media.

 Its not necessary to have outright voter fraud to subvert a free and fair election.  Not even the Left are *that* stupid.

This is about a a conspiracy-that's what is - of very wealthy individuals using their wealth and power to control what facts and campaigning messages the electorate are *allowed* to know about candidates running for elections.  This isn't limited to the usual promotion of a preferred candidate and denigration of the other by a single media outlet. This was a co-ordinated, multi-faceted campaign to subvert a free and fair election by powerful and very wealthy individuals.  It was literally a "cabal".

And they succeeded.  

And you wonder why people believe the election was "stolen".

It's only illegal because it happened to Trump.  When Palmer did it, even when blatantly lying, that's fine.

FWIW Lying outright like Palmer did about death duties should be illegal.  Also Labour running the mediscare campaign.  Just as bad.  Someone should have gone to jail for that. 

Lol.  Next you'll be whinging at people who hand out how to vote cards at the gates of schools because they're trying to change an election outcome.  

Also Lol.  The MSM is now a 'reputable' source.  (Which it is.)  After we've been told dozens of times by the resident rocket scientist that they can't be trusted.  

Well, we have compulsory voting, so the system is different. 

Is it?  Affer the host literally says say what I've posted

Anyway Great but don't whinge when it happens to your team here..

1. The quote is fabrication.

2.Only Criag Kelly I know was an AFL player.

It is sensationalist. It's not news that a large portion of corporate interests wanted Trump out. But what they did wasn't illegal. They just used their influence to rally a greater turnout for the Dems. The same happens for the GOP as well.

Fucking LOL big time.

I love it when some numpty is given literally a direct quote from a reputable source about the extraordinary efforts that went into changing the election outcome, and all he can do is spin to so as to allow him perceive the world through a different flow of information. Congratulations Clouseou.

Enzo: "People's perceptions have been altered by a global cabal. Anyone who voted for biden did so because of a lack of free will and ability to think for oneself'

Also enzo: uses the term "leftard" because others on craig Kelly's Facebook page do too.

Fucking lol big time.

I love when people try to push this narrative as some big global "cabal" conspiracy.  Certain actors have  always controlled information and influenced the populace. This is true from the beginning of civilisation to today. Arguably it's becoming less of a constant rule through the advent of social media.

But you think you know the "truth"? All you've done is perceive the world through a different flow of information. Congratulations Q.

Here comes tweedle-dumber to the rescue of tweedle-dumb !

Enzo in the blue.

nice attempt at misdirection..but no cigar.

Next time Labor and the Greens loses (another) election I won't hear  a peep from you or your sycophants about Palmer. Murdoch, Sky and Jones blaming them for the loss?  Is that right?  Not a peep?  Because No fraud.  No interference.

The judges ruled that there was no fraud or interference?

I'm glad you think of me like that <3

-PB

The difference is the presentation of an argument with evidence that preceded that.

But of course that escapes you because your little feeble brain can only think to a shallow depth.  You actually think that my objection to your personal attacks is *only* about the personal attacks.  

Its actually about the fact you have nothing to back it up your position.. Literally nothing.  

No surpise.  Ad hom attack is a predictable Leftard tactic.

Enzo wrote:  Muz and Manrubz I could understand.  But even a knob like you should get that.

  When you have nothing, all you have is personal attacks. Sad feeble mind.

HAHAHA.  The jokes on you of course that's what they want.  And of course the second Amendment exists to stop the very thing the Democrats want: Total Control.

Reckon we're one, possibly 2 steps, away from Enzo telling us that kamala Harris is a reptillian.

Getting insulted by you is like being flogged with a wilted lettuce leaf.

What about this corker?   'Democrats wanting to negate the second amendment and outlaw private gun ownership.'

Hahaha.

Member since 2008.

LOL.  Their explanation amounts to the "Time article was sensationalist".

And then this doozy:

"Powerful people many dominated by people on the centre left interests but many on the centre right worked in order to exert their $billions in influence to try and get the election to go the way they wanted"

Nothing to see.  Move right along.  Free and Fair.

Huh?  The judges have nothing to do with this manipulation of the election outcome by a rich cabal of elites.

Democracy is when the people decide who to lead them of their own free will. 

Free will is impossible when a cabal of rich elites "working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information" to influence the outcome of an election in a way they want.

Muz and Manrubz I could understand.  But even a knob like you should get that.

I think you're letting your hatred for the Democrats affect your thinking. This is a good video on the Time article trying to cut through that noise. https://youtu.be/DkX_LAaWYM8

So they rigged it so good that conservative judges through out the cases?

They're in on it too?

-PB

Wow what did I read. 

Lol NOW its a "storming". 

And it wasn't the White House you numpty.

As for the Civil War:

I said it would be the closest the US has got to a civil war since the Civil War . 

So what do we have:

A storming of the White house and it would appear division amongst the security forces as to their support of Biden and the Democrats.

The only President and party that stationed 25,000 armed troops to protect them from their own people. That's more than in Afghanistan and Iraq combined.

Warnings form the FBI that "enemy" is within.

Democrats wanting to negate the second amendment and outlaw private gun ownership.

Its stewing and brewing.  What happens next depends on where Biden and the Dims take it next.

Because the are so farked in the head that they can't even see what is wrong with what they are admitting to happened 

In their retarded minds Democracy was saved when their side conspired to influence the election outcome because.....umm ... it was their side that did it.

That's Leftard logic 101.

Ohh you so soo smartz, so much best than all ov us.