ANZ Stadium and SFS to be knocked down


ANZ Stadium and SFS to be knocked down

Author
Message
Condemned666
Condemned666
Pro
Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K, Visits: 0
More white noise with regards to the matter
melbourne_terrace
melbourne_terrace
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K, Visits: 0
all that stuff that Levi's Stadium is bragging about sounds like useless shite.


Viennese Vuck

u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
Condemned666 wrote:
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/27454404/sydney-stadiums-pay-day-close-baird/

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/san-francisco-49ers-levis-stadium-being-looked-at-as-model-in-sydney-stadium-war-20150429-1mvxbb.html

Who do you believe? :-#

Good thing the top article calls for upgrades to all three stadia, rather than the removal on one or two of the stadia.
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
Sydney needs a 40k seater football stadium and an 80k seater football stadium. Not one 60k seater stadium.
marconi101
marconi101
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K, Visits: 0
They want to build a new stadium of 60k when the 45k stadium right next door rarely gets filled? Logical

He was a man of specific quirks. He believed that all meals should be earned through physical effort. He also contended, zealously like a drunk with a political point, that the third dimension would not be possible if it werent for the existence of water.

Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
The stuff I was told doesn't make a lot of sense I don't think. Not ruling it out, as the source knows a lot more about it than I do, but it's difficult.
Condemned666
Condemned666
Pro
Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K, Visits: 0
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/27454404/sydney-stadiums-pay-day-close-baird/

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/san-francisco-49ers-levis-stadium-being-looked-at-as-model-in-sydney-stadium-war-20150429-1mvxbb.html

Who do you believe? :-#
Condemned666
Condemned666
Pro
Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K, Visits: 0
WaMackie wrote:
biscuitman1871 wrote:
WaMackie wrote:
Condemned666 wrote:
Also
With the cathy freeman moment still in people's memories, the reconciliation and indigenous recognition movement means its extra hard to demolish anz due to the significance of the site

Granted, they can just put up a plaque in the middle of a park in a suburb to signify the moment, but there are parties that suggest otherwise!


So they’re going to keep a multi-million dollar stadium, owned by the AFL Chairman (Fitzpatrick), in the middle of nowhere, alive for a buck-tooth chick who can’t talk properly?


Quoted for future reference


Yeah, use it for whatever you want, it's got more coherence and cogniscance than anything you're ever written on here.



Its actually as simple as that

The compromise may be to put a park where the ANZ is, and just rename it Cathy Freeman park, or put a plaque there, rather than have a white elephant of a stadium. The stadium is staying there because of the city of Sydney is in a state of denial over the fact that the venues for the Sydney Olympics outlasted the Athens + Beijing Olympics

Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:

I concur
WaMackie
WaMackie
Pro
Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K, Visits: 0
australiantibullus wrote:
rusty wrote:


So much better than the usual right wing horse shit he usually posts. WaMackie cold learn from this.


Mate, I only learn off your spelling! :)
australiantibullus
australiantibullus
Pro
Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:


So much better than the usual right wing horse shit he usually posts. WaMackie cold learn from this.
Eldar
Eldar
Pro
Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K, Visits: 0
scott21 wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
If Sydney demolishes two football stadia and replaces it with one 60k seater, then where are Sydney FC gonna play?

15-20k in a 60k seater will look even worse than it looks in the 45k seater SFS.

I would prefer ANZ was modified to make the ends steeper and more like a football stadium. And make the ends as well as the sides come in when its in rectangular mode similar to the way Etihad is configured. That will fix the view problems.

Any new construction at sfs will be bad for sfc. They have missed the boat and should have moved to kogarah seasons ago. Now Cahill FC will come in leaving them playing at anz while renovations of sfs occur. This will be disastrous for their fan base. They should now start to think about playing at Brookvale under the construction time, as west and south Sydney seem to be lost/ or lost in the future


If the salary cap keeps rising then SFC will easily fill out a 60k stadium regularly at some point in the future....Brookvale, you guys are trolling or clueless.

Beaten by Eldar

Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
melbourne_terrace wrote:
benelsmore wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
Sydney needs an 80k plus stadium though.

Where are they gonna put the bledisloe cup, NRL Grandfinal, state of origin?

60k is too small I reckon.

Also, if they wanna put the 60k + seater stadium, are they gonna put a rail line there, cos I reckon they'll need it.

Yeah, was talking to my dad about it, and we agreed the same thing. We need a big stadium, and 60k just isn't enough really.


The Bledisloe (and Rugby Union in general) is declining in popularity each year and it is not worth having a stadium built to 80k when there are only 2 events each year that justify that sort of capacity.

Rebuilding the SFS to 60k means that Sydney will have a premium venue that isn't absolutely shite. That along with a redevelopment of Parra makes far more sense than blowing a heap of cash on a stadium that everyone hates.


That's because Australia is shite at rugby :lol:


That's what happens when your playing and supporter base is nearly exclusively private school old-boys. It deserves to die here as all of it's administrators are fucking idiots and have taken things for granted since professionalism.

You wish death on more people and things than even the most hardcore ISIS member.

You some sort of death cultist?

WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

aussie scott21
aussie scott21
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
If Sydney demolishes two football stadia and replaces it with one 60k seater, then where are Sydney FC gonna play?

15-20k in a 60k seater will look even worse than it looks in the 45k seater SFS.

I would prefer ANZ was modified to make the ends steeper and more like a football stadium. And make the ends as well as the sides come in when its in rectangular mode similar to the way Etihad is configured. That will fix the view problems.

Any new construction at sfs will be bad for sfc. They have missed the boat and should have moved to kogarah seasons ago. Now Cahill FC will come in leaving them playing at anz while renovations of sfs occur. This will be disastrous for their fan base. They should now start to think about playing at Brookvale under the construction time, as west and south Sydney seem to be lost/ or lost in the future
tbitm
tbitm
Pro
Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)Pro (3.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
If Sydney demolishes two football stadia and replaces it with one 60k seater, then where are Sydney FC gonna play?

15-20k in a 60k seater will look even worse than it looks in the 45k seater SFS.

I would prefer ANZ was modified to make the ends steeper and more like a football stadium. And make the ends as well as the sides come in when its in rectangular mode similar to the way Etihad is configured. That will fix the view problems.
Not sure i agree. 10k at aami park with the top closed off looks better than 12k at newcastle with the entire stadium open. Would depend on how it was built.

It the stands were steep and people sat close to the pitch at a new SFS it would look better on tv than it currently does
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
If Sydney demolishes two football stadia and replaces it with one 60k seater, then where are Sydney FC gonna play?

15-20k in a 60k seater will look even worse than it looks in the 45k seater SFS.

I would prefer ANZ was modified to make the ends steeper and more like a football stadium. And make the ends as well as the sides come in when its in rectangular mode similar to the way Etihad is configured. That will fix the view problems.
scotty21
scotty21
World Class
World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:


Post of the year


jlm8695
jlm8695
Legend
Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:


Agree.
rusty
rusty
World Class
World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)World Class (6.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0

melbourne_terrace
melbourne_terrace
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K, Visits: 0
benelsmore wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
Sydney needs an 80k plus stadium though.

Where are they gonna put the bledisloe cup, NRL Grandfinal, state of origin?

60k is too small I reckon.

Also, if they wanna put the 60k + seater stadium, are they gonna put a rail line there, cos I reckon they'll need it.

Yeah, was talking to my dad about it, and we agreed the same thing. We need a big stadium, and 60k just isn't enough really.


The Bledisloe (and Rugby Union in general) is declining in popularity each year and it is not worth having a stadium built to 80k when there are only 2 events each year that justify that sort of capacity.

Rebuilding the SFS to 60k means that Sydney will have a premium venue that isn't absolutely shite. That along with a redevelopment of Parra makes far more sense than blowing a heap of cash on a stadium that everyone hates.


That's because Australia is shite at rugby :lol:


That's what happens when your playing and supporter base is nearly exclusively private school old-boys. It deserves to die here as all of it's administrators are fucking idiots and have taken things for granted since professionalism.

Viennese Vuck

BETHFC
BETHFC
World Class
World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K, Visits: 0
melbourne_terrace wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
Sydney needs an 80k plus stadium though.

Where are they gonna put the bledisloe cup, NRL Grandfinal, state of origin?

60k is too small I reckon.

Also, if they wanna put the 60k + seater stadium, are they gonna put a rail line there, cos I reckon they'll need it.

Yeah, was talking to my dad about it, and we agreed the same thing. We need a big stadium, and 60k just isn't enough really.


The Bledisloe (and Rugby Union in general) is declining in popularity each year and it is not worth having a stadium built to 80k when there are only 2 events each year that justify that sort of capacity.

Rebuilding the SFS to 60k means that Sydney will have a premium venue that isn't absolutely shite. That along with a redevelopment of Parra makes far more sense than blowing a heap of cash on a stadium that everyone hates.


That's because Australia is shite at rugby :lol:
WaMackie
WaMackie
Pro
Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K, Visits: 0
biscuitman1871 wrote:
WaMackie wrote:
Condemned666 wrote:
Also
With the cathy freeman moment still in people's memories, the reconciliation and indigenous recognition movement means its extra hard to demolish anz due to the significance of the site

Granted, they can just put up a plaque in the middle of a park in a suburb to signify the moment, but there are parties that suggest otherwise!


So they’re going to keep a multi-million dollar stadium, owned by the AFL Chairman (Fitzpatrick), in the middle of nowhere, alive for a buck-tooth chick who can’t talk properly?


Quoted for future reference


Yeah, use it for whatever you want, it's got more coherence and cogniscance than anything you're ever written on here.

Edited by wamackie: 14/4/2015 12:35:10 PM
biscuitman1871
biscuitman1871
Pro
Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)Pro (4.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.4K, Visits: 0
WaMackie wrote:
Condemned666 wrote:
Also
With the cathy freeman moment still in people's memories, the reconciliation and indigenous recognition movement means its extra hard to demolish anz due to the significance of the site

Granted, they can just put up a plaque in the middle of a park in a suburb to signify the moment, but there are parties that suggest otherwise!


So they’re going to keep a multi-million dollar stadium, owned by the AFL Chairman (Fitzpatrick), in the middle of nowhere, alive for a buck-tooth chick who can’t talk properly?


Quoted for future reference

Image


paladisious
paladisious
Legend
Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K, Visits: 0
Eldar wrote:
No football should be played at the MCG, ever, period, finito, it's a fucking Cricket ground FFS.



Until the rectangular conversion, that is, of course.
melbourne_terrace
melbourne_terrace
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K, Visits: 0
Captain Haddock wrote:
ANZ isn't worthy of the bashing it's getting here. The view itself is decent enough compared to the MCG however once the Swans leave their tenancy, the seating should be moved to a rectangular format. I think the real problem lies outside the stadium- there's not much in the way of iconic bars or nightlife to make the game a day/ night out. Compared to Suncorp or even the SFS, people tend to get there, stay for the game and then f**k off as quickly as they can when it's over. More boutique bars/ restaurants and an entertainment 'hub' would improve people's perception of going to games at ANZ a hell of a lot.

That being said, the SFS should absolutely have its' configuration changed to accommodate 60k- with a light rail link connecting it to Central and other key spots in the CBD.


Unless you're willing to pay hundreds for seats at the halfway line and halfway back in the stands where the view is ordinary at best, it really is as bad as the MCG. When you're behind the goals or even in the corner, it's a real struggle to see the far end of the pitch because there is bugger all incline in the stands. MCG might be further back but the stands are far steeper.

Agree with the rest of the post, Homebush is boring as and most of us who chose to fly in for Australia games will spend the day drinking around George St instead of going out there before the game. Personally I'd rather no games played at either but if i had to choose, i'd go with the MCG just because it would be a far better day out than going to fucking Homebush.

Viennese Vuck

Eldar
Eldar
Pro
Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K, Visits: 0
No football should be played at the MCG, ever, period, finito, it's a fucking Cricket ground FFS.



Beaten by Eldar

WaMackie
WaMackie
Pro
Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K, Visits: 0
Condemned666 wrote:
Also
With the cathy freeman moment still in people's memories, the reconciliation and indigenous recognition movement means its extra hard to demolish anz due to the significance of the site

Granted, they can just put up a plaque in the middle of a park in a suburb to signify the moment, but there are parties that suggest otherwise!


So they’re going to keep a multi-million dollar stadium, owned by the AFL Chairman (Fitzpatrick), in the middle of nowhere, alive for a buck-tooth chick who can’t talk properly?
Captain Haddock
Captain Haddock
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
ANZ isn't worthy of the bashing it's getting here. The view itself is decent enough compared to the MCG however once the Swans leave their tenancy, the seating should be moved to a rectangular format. I think the real problem lies outside the stadium- there's not much in the way of iconic bars or nightlife to make the game a day/ night out. Compared to Suncorp or even the SFS, people tend to get there, stay for the game and then f**k off as quickly as they can when it's over. More boutique bars/ restaurants and an entertainment 'hub' would improve people's perception of going to games at ANZ a hell of a lot.

That being said, the SFS should absolutely have its' configuration changed to accommodate 60k- with a light rail link connecting it to Central and other key spots in the CBD.

There are only two intellectually honest debate tactics: (a) pointing out errors or omissions in your opponent’s facts, or (b) pointing out errors or omissions in your opponent’s logic. All other debate tactics are intellectually dishonest - John T. Reed

The Most Popular Presidential Candidate Of All Time (TM) cant go to a sports stadium in the country he presides over. Figure that one out...




Condemned666
Condemned666
Pro
Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)Pro (3.4K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K, Visits: 0
Also
With the cathy freeman moment still in people's memories, the reconciliation and indigenous recognition movement means its extra hard to demolish anz due to the significance of the site

Granted, they can just put up a plaque in the middle of a park in a suburb to signify the moment, but there are parties that suggest otherwise!
Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
scott21 wrote:
Heineken wrote:
The SFS getting knocked down and rebuilt sounds more plausible. It needs a steeper gradient at both ends. And a new roof.

And bigger screens

The new screens are f***ing huge!
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search