tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
walnuts wrote:This doesn't hurt the boys, it will harden them up significantly - they will have to look for creative solutions to problems rather than just relying on 'the curriculum' to hold possession and pass it around the back. We need problem solvers, not rigid robots who preach nothing but triangles and possession - as Portugal showed this morning, you don't always need to play pretty football to win matches.
Agree, and using an example from MV (and maybe my obsevravtion here is way off) but galloway - at 17 looked like an amazing prospect, plays now so rigid it's like he's on tram tracks
|
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Decentric wrote:The norm in other countries is that young players develop better aiming for senior pro level, by being at pro club, and having exposure to senior players, senior coaches and striving to become a senior pro in that particular club.
There should be a pathway at pro clubs. This is arguably the most important point in the washup of this result to lowly ranked Myanmar. The trouble is there are only 9 pro clubs in Australia at the minute, which is why many of us have been calling for expansion at the very least, if not, the implementation of a second division.
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
tsf wrote:grazorblade wrote:tsf wrote:^ having said that, I think a football philosophy is good thing to have, I'm just not sure we will be that successful at following it, how long has it been so far 10 years (genuinely don't know)? None of our kids that have grown up and trained this new system seem that good or technically gifted yet.
Edited by tsf: 11/7/2016 08:48:28 AM The kids who have grown up with it since the age of 9 are now 17 yrs old All senior teams have had some influence of our national football philosophy. Id put the start of this either when jan had some of our youth teams or when postecoglu started at roar. So maybe 2010ish. That coincides roughly when we started exporting youth that actually got playing time in decent leagues again. The youth we have exported have gradually improved and our acl results have gradually improved its tricky though clubs have just started building academies old soccer and new football is hopelessly divided so the resources and fan bases are hopelessly divided we have only 9 professional teams and no second division we have 24 fulltime youth players compared to about 5000 in germany
thats a pitiful amount of infrastructure to take on the big hittersInterested to see why we only got a 1-1 result against myamnar when the previous generation got 4-0 :-k All important points "Football is a simple game. Twenty-two men chase a ball for 90 minutes and at the end, the Germans always win." - Gary Lineker
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
^ love it
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs.
|
|
|
walnuts
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
socceroo_06 wrote:In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs. In Australia's defence, we do have at least 48 professional clubs in the country - the only problem is that 39 of them are other sports (18 AFL + 16 NRL + 5 Rugby Union). This is not even beginning to scratch the surface with other professional sports such as basketball etc etc. That's where most of the funding goes to in this country sadly. I think we can do more clubs, absolutely, and I want it to happen - but we're still pushing shit up hill at the moment by not being the dominant player in the marketplace.
|
|
|
zugzwang52
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 130,
Visits: 2
|
grazorblade wrote: Interested to see why we only got a 1-1 result against myamnar when the previous generation got 4-0 :-k
Score line (more so the implications of the score) doesn't suggest it but the boys actually played a great game and should have won based on possession, shots, talent etc. IMO, the game should have been over in the first half. We had some real great chances in the 1st half but were unable to find the back of net and that came back to haunt us in the 2nd half. Hopefully, its only wins from here!
|
|
|
localstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
socceroo_06 wrote:In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs. No Aussie Rules or Rugby in Portugal.
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
walnuts wrote:socceroo_06 wrote:In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs. In Australia's defence, we do have at least 48 professional clubs in the country - the only problem is that 39 of them are other sports (18 AFL + 16 NRL + 5 Rugby Union). This is not even beginning to scratch the surface with other professional sports such as basketball etc etc. That's where most of the funding goes to in this country sadly. I think we can do more clubs, absolutely, and I want it to happen - but we're still pushing shit up hill at the moment by not being the dominant player in the marketplace. In Portugal, a country less than half the population of Australia, they have 42 pro football clubs, 10 pro Rugby Union Clubs, 12 pro Handball Clubs, 14 pro Futsal Clubs. I'm not including Basketball, Roller Hockey, Volleyball & Beach Soccer all of which contain professional leagues too. To put it simply, there are no excuses.
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
localstar wrote:socceroo_06 wrote:In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs. No Aussie Rules or Rugby in Portugal. Campeonato Português de Rugby is a professional Rugby Union league of 10 teams. There are professional sports such as handball & futsal that do not exist in a similar format here.
|
|
|
walnuts
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
socceroo_06 wrote:walnuts wrote:socceroo_06 wrote:In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs. In Australia's defence, we do have at least 48 professional clubs in the country - the only problem is that 39 of them are other sports (18 AFL + 16 NRL + 5 Rugby Union). This is not even beginning to scratch the surface with other professional sports such as basketball etc etc. That's where most of the funding goes to in this country sadly. I think we can do more clubs, absolutely, and I want it to happen - but we're still pushing shit up hill at the moment by not being the dominant player in the marketplace. In Portugal, a country less than half the population of Australia, they have 42 pro football clubs, 10 pro Rugby Union Clubs, 12 pro Handball Clubs, 14 pro Futsal Clubs. I'm not including Basketball, Roller Hockey, Volleyball & Beach Soccer all of which contain professional leagues too. To put it simply, there are no excuses. How many of those, in particular handball and futsal clubs, are extensions of existing football clubs though? Riding on the coattails of football's success and money?
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
walnuts wrote:socceroo_06 wrote:walnuts wrote:socceroo_06 wrote:In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs. In Australia's defence, we do have at least 48 professional clubs in the country - the only problem is that 39 of them are other sports (18 AFL + 16 NRL + 5 Rugby Union). This is not even beginning to scratch the surface with other professional sports such as basketball etc etc. That's where most of the funding goes to in this country sadly. I think we can do more clubs, absolutely, and I want it to happen - but we're still pushing shit up hill at the moment by not being the dominant player in the marketplace. In Portugal, a country less than half the population of Australia, they have 42 pro football clubs, 10 pro Rugby Union Clubs, 12 pro Handball Clubs, 14 pro Futsal Clubs. I'm not including Basketball, Roller Hockey, Volleyball & Beach Soccer all of which contain professional leagues too. To put it simply, there are no excuses. How many of those, in particular handball and futsal clubs, are extensions of existing football clubs though? Riding on the coattails of football's success and money? Well for starters, not one of Portugal's professional football clubs are included in Deloitte's Football Money League 2016 report. http://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/sports-business-group/articles/deloitte-football-money-league.htmlPortuguese clubs generate most of their revenue from on-selling the players they develop. The highest revenue earned from TV-rights was SL Benfica who received €10m. The only 3 sporting clubs that exist in handball & futsal are Porto, Benfica & Sporting.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
zugzwang52 wrote:grazorblade wrote: Interested to see why we only got a 1-1 result against myamnar when the previous generation got 4-0 :-k
Score line (more so the implications of the score) doesn't suggest it but the boys actually played a great game and should have won based on possession, shots, talent etc. IMO, the game should have been over in the first half. We had some real great chances in the 1st half but were unable to find the back of net and that came back to haunt us in the 2nd half. Hopefully, its only wins from here! I wonder if finishing is a problem. I saw some improvement in finishing at the last aff tournament hopefully this trend continues its hard to tell where we are at without watching because any minnow can get a fit and organized team to park the bus and play on the counter and nick the occasional result. Hopefully we get to see the next few matches and can make informed judgements
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
localstar wrote:socceroo_06 wrote:In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs. No Aussie Rules or Rugby in Portugal. football in australia is very divided and you also have a very spread out country which means less away supporters to prop up attendance numbers we also have a lot of huge stadiums or tiny stadiums but not enough in between
|
|
|
zugzwang52
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 130,
Visits: 2
|
grazorblade wrote:zugzwang52 wrote:grazorblade wrote: Interested to see why we only got a 1-1 result against myamnar when the previous generation got 4-0 :-k
Score line (more so the implications of the score) doesn't suggest it but the boys actually played a great game and should have won based on possession, shots, talent etc. IMO, the game should have been over in the first half. We had some real great chances in the 1st half but were unable to find the back of net and that came back to haunt us in the 2nd half. Hopefully, its only wins from here! I wonder if finishing is a problem. I saw some improvement in finishing at the last aff tournament hopefully this trend continues its hard to tell where we are at without watching because any minnow can get a fit and organized team to park the bus and play on the counter and nick the occasional result. Hopefully we get to see the next few matches and can make informed judgements The team has some great finishers but just couldn't make it happen yesterday. Not looking to make excuses for the lads but the pitch was bloody atrocious, had bouncy balls going everywhere. None the less great experience for the players in terms of learning to adapt and should come in handy v Vietnam which is played in the stadium. The moment Myanmar took the lead, they parked the bus completely which the boys couldn't break down. Tuesdays game v Vietnam which is the most important one IMO (ensure progression to knockouts, inspect new players for AFC, gauge where Aus as a nation is) most likely won't be streamed or covered which is terrible but the 3 after should be.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
zugzwang52 wrote:grazorblade wrote:zugzwang52 wrote:grazorblade wrote: Interested to see why we only got a 1-1 result against myamnar when the previous generation got 4-0 :-k
Score line (more so the implications of the score) doesn't suggest it but the boys actually played a great game and should have won based on possession, shots, talent etc. IMO, the game should have been over in the first half. We had some real great chances in the 1st half but were unable to find the back of net and that came back to haunt us in the 2nd half. Hopefully, its only wins from here! I wonder if finishing is a problem. I saw some improvement in finishing at the last aff tournament hopefully this trend continues its hard to tell where we are at without watching because any minnow can get a fit and organized team to park the bus and play on the counter and nick the occasional result. Hopefully we get to see the next few matches and can make informed judgements The team has some great finishers but just couldn't make it happen yesterday. Not looking to make excuses for the lads but the pitch was bloody atrocious, had bouncy balls going everywhere. None the less great experience for the players in terms of learning to adapt and should come in handy v Vietnam which is played in the stadium. The moment Myanmar took the lead, they parked the bus completely which the boys couldn't break down. Tuesdays game v Vietnam which is the most important one IMO (ensure progression to knockouts, inspect new players for AFC, gauge where Aus as a nation is) most likely won't be streamed or covered which is terrible but the 3 after should be. Welcome to the forum, Zugzwang.:)
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:localstar wrote:socceroo_06 wrote:In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs. No Aussie Rules or Rugby in Portugal. football in australia is very divided and you also have a very spread out country which means less away supporters to prop up attendance numbers we also have a lot of huge stadiums or tiny stadiums but not enough in between Only 5 teams in the Primeira Liga have attendance above 10K. The rest are lucky to crack 5k. Some of the expansion criteria set out by the FFA are purely based on gut-feeling with very little evidence to back up their claims.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
socceroo_06 wrote:
Some of the expansion criteria set out by the FFA are purely based on gut-feeling with very little evidence to back up their claims.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :oops:
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
tsf wrote:Decentric wrote:tsf wrote:But how was the triangle passing, playing out from the back..yada yada? :roll: You make light of this. Most of the best senior international teams in the world do it - better than anybody else. yes I do, because although I like good looking passing football it isn't something that seems to come natural to Aussies (lots of reasons for this including the congested sporting landscape), nor do I believe it's one of their strengths. In the balkans latin countries etc you have kids that go on the streets at 8am with a football, they come in at 10pm. That's why they are such good natural technical players. Also interesting to see a team today win one of the top tournaments in the world, and they didn't even want the football for most of the tournament. You reckon they're sitting around evaluating their pass count or having toom much of a good time to even think about it? There is no right or wrong way to play the game, but maybe we need to consider what our strengths really are (if we have any) Edited by tsf: 11/7/2016 08:39:34 AM In terms of achieving sustained international success, the boffins from FFA state there is. Only 8 teams have had sustained success using 3 criteria of what defines success. Hence, acquiring the title of football powerhouse. I'd also add that Portugal, and Croatia are now very close to also being defined as having sustained success. They also play the same way as 7 of the other powerhouses. Teams that 'nick results' rarely win international titles in Europe, South America or World Cups.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
socceroo_06 wrote:In light of Portugal's successful Euro 2016 win, it might be a good idea to understand how a country with a population of 10mil+ are able to have 42 professional clubs across 2 divisions and develop the kind of players that they do. Enough of the excuse making, we will go nowhere as a football nation with 9 professional clubs. After being in Europe a few weeks ago, this is my greatest concern in Oz ATM. 9 professional clubs is just too few. I'm desperate to see South Melb installed immediately as a readymade HAL club, with a different type of sustainable model. I think they also have a readymade, sequential program for underage players to follow a pathway to senior level. I'm not sure if there are one or two other pre-existing, readymade NPL clubs who could also start in the HAL, but we just need more professional club scenarios ASAP. One high level FFA coach told me recently that a young adult who has gone from a well known NPL set up, has taken a whole season just to get used to the rigours of daily professional club training at HAL level. Basically, the step up from part-time NPL football to daily HAL training, has killed him. I think we need about 20 pro clubs - all with pathways from under 10s to senior level. At this year's National FFA Regional Conference the whole thrust of FFA ( Abrams' inspired) is that FFA TDs now go out and work with the NPL clubs - not like previously with the onus on clubs contacting FFA for assistance. Edited by Decentric: 11/7/2016 01:32:42 PM
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:socceroo_06 wrote:
Some of the expansion criteria set out by the FFA are purely based on gut-feeling with very little evidence to back up their claims.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :oops: Great contribution =d> From the Whole of Football Plan, the FFA notes the following regarding expanding the professional club base: Quote:COMPOSITION OF THE A-LEAGUE A-League competition expansion will come as a product of sustainable commercial growth, via a managed process of “in and out” as circumstances arise, rather than a relegation and promotion system based purely on results. This is critical to retain the strategic market placement of clubs which underpins the commercial viability of the league. Sounds like something drawn up by a marketing guru than someone with actual football knowledge, particularly the last sentence. "Strategic Market Placement", wtf is that? 8-[ Quote:Every major Australian centre with a population over 500,000 has the market size to host an A-League club. What does the size of the population have anything to do with the viability of a football club. When has this been relevant, anywhere, in the history of professional football clubs? Based on this, population centres such as ACT, TAS, Illawarra, Gold Coast, FNQ, Nth NSW etc. are ruled out. In fact, existing markets such as the Central Coast & Newcastle/Lake Macquarie would effectively be excluded as well.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
Lol paulc trying to stay relevant. What a wanker.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
socceroo_06 wrote:Quote:Every major Australian centre with a population over 500,000 has the market size to host an A-League club. Based on this, population centres such as ACT, TAS, Illawarra, Gold Coast, FNQ, Nth NSW etc. are ruled out. In fact, existing markets such as the Central Coast & Newcastle/Lake Macquarie would effectively be excluded as well. This bit is a worry. Why can't the ACT of Townsville or Darwin for that matter play out of a little boutique stadium like Man City academy plays out that holds 7 or 8 thousand punters.  I understand what the FFA are trying to do but they need to loosen up the entry criteria a bit. 10 teams is not enough. 12 and 14 are a problem though too. What do they do? Play each other twice (not enough) or 3 times (too many). Definitely don't want to see an AFL type draw eventuate.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
I reckon they need to look at their own operations.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Too few clubs leads to lack of game time and obviously that stunts development. We have players between 22-25 that are still considered young here and played about 50 professional games. You have many players in Europe who have played about 150-200 games by the time they are 23
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
tsf wrote:Too few clubs leads to lack of game time and obviously that stunts development. We have players between 22-25 that are still considered young here and played about 50 professional games. You have many players in Europe who have played about 150-200 games by the time they are 23 Number of games played by Big-5 club players up to the age of 23:Goalkeepers: 77 Full Backs: 103 Centre Backs: 101 Central Midfielders: 109 Forwards: 120 http://www.football-observatory.com/-Ratings-eng-
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
socceroo_06 wrote:tsf wrote:Too few clubs leads to lack of game time and obviously that stunts development. We have players between 22-25 that are still considered young here and played about 50 professional games. You have many players in Europe who have played about 150-200 games by the time they are 23 Number of games played by Big-5 club players up to the age of 23:Goalkeepers: 77 Full Backs: 103 Centre Backs: 101 Central Midfielders: 109 Forwards: 120 http://www.football-observatory.com/-Ratings-eng- We could dream of players like that. Griezman, I see he had played 179 games for Real Sociadad by the time he was 23! Scored 46 goals too. Others like goetze 120 odd bundelsiga games and a world cup winning goal by 22, reus almost 150 games by the same age too. Obviously these guys are elite. but shows what you need to get there. Even look at lukaku - 23 and around 200 professional club games.
|
|
|
socceroo_06
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
tsf wrote:socceroo_06 wrote:tsf wrote:Too few clubs leads to lack of game time and obviously that stunts development. We have players between 22-25 that are still considered young here and played about 50 professional games. You have many players in Europe who have played about 150-200 games by the time they are 23 Number of games played by Big-5 club players up to the age of 23:Goalkeepers: 77 Full Backs: 103 Centre Backs: 101 Central Midfielders: 109 Forwards: 120 http://www.football-observatory.com/-Ratings-eng- We could dream of players like that. Griezman, I see he had played 179 games for Real Sociadad by the time he was 23! Scored 46 goals too. Others like goetze 120 odd bundelsiga games and a world cup winning goal by 22, reus almost 150 games by the same age too. Obviously these guys are elite. but shows what you need to get there. Even look at lukaku - 23 and around 200 professional club games. Yes & of course there will be the usual detractors on here saying, but it's France & Germany...their population is so much greater than ours, of course they have more players to choose from and can form bigger leagues. Or we could look at a country like Portugal with half the population of Australia, a third of the GDP and geographically positioned in one of the worst performing continental economies in recent memory. All of their players meet the big-5 averages despite not being a big-5 country nor having the equivalent facilities to call on from.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
tsf wrote:Too few clubs leads to lack of game time and obviously that stunts development. We have players between 22-25 that are still considered young here and played about 50 professional games. You have many players in Europe who have played about 150-200 games by the time they are 23 There is total agreement on this issue in Australia.
|
|
|
Mustang67
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 954,
Visits: 0
|
zugzwang52 wrote:grazorblade wrote: Interested to see why we only got a 1-1 result against myamnar when the previous generation got 4-0 :-k
Score line (more so the implications of the score) doesn't suggest it but the boys actually played a great game and should have won based on possession, shots, talent etc. IMO, the game should have been over in the first half. We had some real great chances in the 1st half but were unable to find the back of net and that came back to haunt us in the 2nd half. Hopefully, its only wins from here! Welcome zugzwang52 sounds like your there watching. If so please keep us up to date.
|
|
|