Tim Hunt sexism row reignited after scientist quits writers' group


Tim Hunt sexism row reignited after scientist quits writers' group

Author
Message
quickflick
quickflick
World Class
World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K, Visits: 0
Robin McKie appearing in the Guardian on 11 October, 2015 wrote:

A new dispute has erupted over the fate of Sir Tim Hunt, the Nobel prizewinner accused of making sexist remarks at an international conference earlier this year. Sir Colin Blakemore, one of Britain’s leading scientists, has resigned as honorary president of the country’s science writers association over its support for the journalist whose reports led to Hunt’s dismissal.

Blakemore said he had been frustrated by the decision of the Association of British Science Writers (ABSW) to continue to give unconditional support to Connie St Louis, who first claimed Hunt had made sexist remarks.

Subsequent evidence has since suggested that St Louis’s account was “unbalanced, exaggerated, and selective”, Blakemore told the Observer.

“Yet the ABSW refuses to investigate the issue, despite the fact that its standing orders explicitly state that ‘wilful or frequent misrepresentation or inaccuracy’ shall be considered a breach of its standards,” he said.

“Given the very serious consequences of St Louis’s reports, and the ABSW’s refusal to act, I have decided to resign. I have been honorary president of the association for 11 years but feel that I have no alternative.”

However, Martin Ince, the president of the ABSW, rejected the idea that the association had a role to play in assuring journalistic standards. “Our statement simply supports her right to report a story without fear of personal attack. We note that Sir Tim Hunt has acknowledged the accuracy of St Louis’s reporting and has apologised for his remarks,” he said.

The resignation of Blakemore, one of the country’s most distinguished biologists and professor of neuroscience and philosophy in the School of Advanced Study, University of London, will rekindle the furore over the treatment of Hunt earlier this year and is likely to raise further questions about journalistic standards employed in covering the affair.

The Nobel prizewinner was subject to intense, vitriolic online abuse in June over reports, originally stemming from St Louis, that he had claimed there should be separate laboratories for men and women and that if women were criticised they cry. Hunt was later sacked from key posts, including an honorary position at University College London.

However, subsequent investigations suggested Hunt had intended his remarks to be jocular, and many of the claims of St Louis – who runs a postgraduate course in science journalism at City University London – about her own professional credentials were called into question. Her online CV was taken down and republished with large chunks of its original material removed.

Nevertheless, in the middle of the furore over the incident, the ABSW – the professional body for UK science journalists and communicators – issued a statement giving “its full support” for St Louis, who happens to be a member of the ABSW board. Since then it has refused to make any further comment on the matter.

Blakemore added: “I’m really disappointed to resign from the ABSW, but I have no choice. In the face of a controversy that’s dominated science journalism for four months, the board of the ABSW has simply brushed away serious complaints and refused to implement its own procedures. The ABSW was in a position to look at all the evidence and to help to bring some closure to this whole affair, but it’s missed that opportunity.”

Blakemore’s action was backed by the distinguished physicist Dame Athene Donald, who also criticised the association. She revealed that several weeks ago she wrote to the ABSW to ask that it investigate the way that the Hunt story was initially reported.

“Tim Hunt’s reputation has been destroyed because careful journalistic due diligence was not followed by many who wrote about the event, and the ABSW decision not to take any further action appears to endorse such behaviour,” Donald, who is professor of experimental physics at Cambridge University (and the university’s former gender equality champion), told the Observer. “The justification for this non-action strikes me as inadequate.”

In addition, the British ambassador in Chile, Fiona Clouder – who is a former head of science and innovation at the Foreign Office – has revealed she has also called for action, in a private capacity, from the ABSW. “It became apparent that not all the facts [concerning the Hunt story] were as originally reported and this was misleading for presenting British science and British values abroad,” she told the Observer. “I suggested the ABSW might acknowledge things were not all as they first appeared in reporting the story. I have not heard any more from the association.”

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/oct/10/tim-hunt-sexism-storm-reignited-scientist-quits-writers-group



Good to see that other prominent British scientists are criticising the way Hunt was dealt with. The poor bloke made one stupid, sexist remark and BANG that's the end of his career and he's on the receiving end of pure venom.

He shouldn't have said what he said, although I do think some jokes which are construed as sexist (about women and about men) are fine, but the reaction is absurd. Basically, the whole world now suffers. One of the most brilliant scientists is incapacitated because of feminist backlash.

Obviously, women have been treated deplorably for millennia. So anything today which is slightly sexist often leads to an overreaction.

Fantastic to see that his colleagues are sticking up for him. Especially Dame Athene Donald, who is a strong proponent of gender equality.

Huge difference between gender equality and just hating men for sins committed in the past.
BETHFC
BETHFC
World Class
World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K, Visits: 0
Doesn't this seem a little trivial? I mean grow the f*ck up you're a prominent scientist. It just shows how in this day and age people are so f*cking sensitive about 'equality' that anyone can cry wolf and destroy someone's career. Ms St Louis had better lawyer up because if I was Mr Hunt I'd be going after her for everything she's worth.

PC these days has gone from over the top to full retard.
AzzaMarch
AzzaMarch
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K, Visits: 0
I disagree that the cause of the over-reaction was "femi-nazis gone mad".

Working in a corporate environment, companies are massively over-sensitive to any issues that may prove controversial. They take the attitude that it is better to smash a walnut with a sledgehammer to ensure no blow back. It really is a policy of corporate/bureaucratic risk minimisation rather than anything else.

The same logic that stops kick-to-kick on the ground after AFL games because of a fear of Public Liability claims.

Having said all that, clearly there was a massive over-reaction. Good to see some logic now seeming to take hold.
marconi101
marconi101
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K, Visits: 0
"We want gender equality, all men are pigs, etc"

He was a man of specific quirks. He believed that all meals should be earned through physical effort. He also contended, zealously like a drunk with a political point, that the third dimension would not be possible if it werent for the existence of water.

Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
The thing is the opening remarks that he made when he spoke are traditionally self-deprecating and jocular in nature.

He was taking the piss. He met his wife in a lab.

More pathetic than him losing his tenure is the pathetic spineless fuckwits that sacked him not having the guts to (a) stand by him or (b) reinstate him.

Confected outrage and just a woeful outcome all round.


Member since 2008.


Muz
Muz
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
Full story here for those interested.

https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-timothy-hunt-witch-hunt/


Member since 2008.


GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search