Third Melbourne Team


Third Melbourne Team

Author
Message
RedshirtWilly
RedshirtWilly
World Class
World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K, Visits: 0
MikeDude wrote:
shallow hal wants a gal wrote:
If a third Melbourne club is doable and has potential for growth then bring them in but give the Wollongong wolves an a league license. I just want a 12 club competition. both Sydney clubs would take a lot of support down to Wollongong on away games. I think the crowds would be very decent down there. They have a great stadium for it, seems almost too perfect


I wouldn't imagine the FFA would want to just go for an 'eleventh' team, as it would mean a bye. It would add no broadcast value.

But 12 teams, as you say, would work. It might be their only choice. It'd mean a sixth match each week, and more bargaining power.


I highly doubt it will be a 33 game season though. How do you feel about 22 games with a pre and post-season until we get to 14 and 16?
The Dudist
The Dudist
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K, Visits: 0
shallow hal wants a gal wrote:
If a third Melbourne club is doable and has potential for growth then bring them in but give the Wollongong wolves an a league license. I just want a 12 club competition. both Sydney clubs would take a lot of support down to Wollongong on away games. I think the crowds would be very decent down there. They have a great stadium for it, seems almost too perfect


I wouldn't imagine the FFA would want to just go for an 'eleventh' team, as it would mean a bye. It would add no broadcast value.

But 12 teams, as you say, would work. It might be their only choice. It'd mean a sixth match each week, and more bargaining power.
SutherlandFan
SutherlandFan
Rising Star
Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)Rising Star (882 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 837, Visits: 0
JP wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
The Gong or you're wrong.

Why?

The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there.
It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO.

Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts


Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong.


A merged /shared club would be a massive failure. Unfortunately the metrics aren't there for Wollongong, the talent in the IPL would be close to that of NNSWNPL plus lots of great football infrastructure in the gong also.
RedshirtWilly
RedshirtWilly
World Class
World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K, Visits: 0
Outonthefull wrote:
3 Sydney 3 Melbourne would be ideal.

Outonthefull
Outonthefull
Amateur
Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 501, Visits: 0
3 Sydney 3 Melbourne would be ideal.
montywoodpeg
montywoodpeg
Hacker
Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)Hacker (361 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 349, Visits: 0
southmelb wrote:
11.mvfc.11 wrote:
South Melbourne with Samaras as marquee would average 10k in their first season. With the right execution, they could challenge Victory as the number one team in town within 5 years.


Not in a million years would south overtake victory, honestly the idea is absurd even if we won the toilet seat every year.

We wouldn't need samaras to average 10k, we had just under 4K on Sunday for park football, the national spotlight alone would tip us close to 10k.


Absolutely, supporters would come out of the woodwork. I could see them having the angle tying their history and appeal of an "authentic" club, as such. Would expect a kind of hipster effect in Melbourne, people finding ties to South from before they were in the A-League.

Really, with up to 4 derbies each season, you'd absolutely expect 10k.
southmelb
southmelb
World Class
World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K, Visits: 0
11.mvfc.11 wrote:
South Melbourne with Samaras as marquee would average 10k in their first season. With the right execution, they could challenge Victory as the number one team in town within 5 years.


Not in a million years would south overtake victory, honestly the idea is absurd even if we won the toilet seat every year.

We wouldn't need samaras to average 10k, we had just under 4K on Sunday for park football, the national spotlight alone would tip us close to 10k.
Pyramid Timmy
Pyramid Timmy
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
spfc wrote:
why the need for a new franchise?, there's a perfectly good A-League license ready and waiting to be bought, it's called the jets


and a crap one









but the Bakries want too much for it
shallow hal wants a gal
shallow hal wants a gal
World Class
World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)World Class (6.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0
If a third Melbourne club is doable and has potential for growth then bring them in but give the Wollongong wolves an a league license. I just want a 12 club competition. both Sydney clubs would take a lot of support down to Wollongong on away games. I think the crowds would be very decent down there. They have a great stadium for it, seems almost too perfect
spfc
spfc
World Class
World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K, Visits: 0
why the need for a new franchise?, there's a perfectly good A-League license ready and waiting to be bought, it's called the jets
chillbilly
chillbilly
World Class
World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)World Class (6.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.2K, Visits: 0
scott21 wrote:
BRFC_92 wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
JP wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
The Gong or you're wrong.

Why?

The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there.
It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO.

Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts


Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong.

Possibly.
The only thing that gives me hope is how great the FFA were in setting up WSW.


Agree. Would love to see a Wollongong team. I reckon it would be a success.

If we want a feel good regional story I say NQ.

We don need another regional nsw team.


Edited by scott21: 22/2/2016 11:07:46 PM

I wouldn't classify Newcastle or Wollongong as regional NSW. They are major cities. Regional NSW is Coff Harbour, Dubbo, Griffith, ...
aussie scott21
aussie scott21
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
BRFC_92 wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
JP wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
The Gong or you're wrong.

Why?

The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there.
It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO.

Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts


Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong.

Possibly.
The only thing that gives me hope is how great the FFA were in setting up WSW.


Agree. Would love to see a Wollongong team. I reckon it would be a success.

If we want a feel good regional story I say NQ.

We don need another regional nsw team.


Edited by scott21: 22/2/2016 11:07:46 PM
BRFC_92
BRFC_92
Pro
Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K, Visits: 0
Eastern Glory wrote:
JP wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
The Gong or you're wrong.

Why?

The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there.
It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO.

Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts


Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong.

Possibly.
The only thing that gives me hope is how great the FFA were in setting up WSW.


Agree. Would love to see a Wollongong team. I reckon it would be a success.
Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
JP wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
The Gong or you're wrong.

Why?

The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there.
It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO.

Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts


Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong.

Possibly.
The only thing that gives me hope is how great the FFA were in setting up WSW.
JP
JP
Pro
Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.5K, Visits: 0
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
The Gong or you're wrong.

Why?

The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there.
It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO.

Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts


Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong.
Steve07
Steve07
Under 7s
Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)Under 7s (19 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 18, Visits: 0
I hope this is true! The stamoulis family are beautiful people, they are around south Melbourne a bit, so that's interesting.
aufc_ole
aufc_ole
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K, Visits: 0
Eastern Glory wrote:
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
The Gong or you're wrong.

Why?

The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there.
It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO.

Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts
Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
aufc_ole wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
The Gong or you're wrong.

Why?

The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there.
It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO.
aufc_ole
aufc_ole
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K, Visits: 0
Eastern Glory wrote:
The Gong or you're wrong.

Why?
RedshirtWilly
RedshirtWilly
World Class
World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)World Class (7.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K, Visits: 0
scott21 wrote:
lukerobinho wrote:
kidding themselves

[youtube]qEja72NSg5Q[/youtube]


Listened to the entire song didnt care about the context
aussie scott21
aussie scott21
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
lukerobinho wrote:
kidding themselves

[youtube]qEja72NSg5Q[/youtube]
Slobodan Drauposevic
Slobodan Drauposevic
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K, Visits: 0
southmelb wrote:
Soft News wrote:
Gold medal soft drink Stamoulis? The bloke that owns the East Preston Observation Deck on Bell Street, near Darebin Creek?


Yes, should be said the family name would be nothing without his late father.


Shocking news.
Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
The Gong or you're wrong.
lukerobinho
lukerobinho
Legend
Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
kidding themselves
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm



-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

AzzaMarch
AzzaMarch
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K, Visits: 0
Would a 3rd VIC team help or hurt in terms of the Victory/ City/ new club establishing their supporter base?

Obviously, Victory is fine - they are the mass-support team.
City- what is their identity?
New club - if it was South, would that kill City? Or would it give them an identity in opposition to the new team? I don't know...

Edited by AzzaMarch: 22/2/2016 03:57:46 PM
Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
Geelong.

WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

Soft News
Soft News
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.4K, Visits: 0
southmelb wrote:
Soft News wrote:
Gold medal soft drink Stamoulis? The bloke that owns the East Preston Observation Deck on Bell Street, near Darebin Creek?


Yes, should be said the family name would be nothing without his late father.
is the son any good, or is he living off the father's wealth?
southmelb
southmelb
World Class
World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)World Class (5.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K, Visits: 0
Soft News wrote:
Gold medal soft drink Stamoulis? The bloke that owns the East Preston Observation Deck on Bell Street, near Darebin Creek?


Yes, should be said the family name would be nothing without his late father.
Soft News
Soft News
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.4K, Visits: 0
Gold medal soft drink Stamoulis? The bloke that owns the East Preston Observation Deck on Bell Street, near Darebin Creek?
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search