RedshirtWilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
MikeDude wrote:shallow hal wants a gal wrote:If a third Melbourne club is doable and has potential for growth then bring them in but give the Wollongong wolves an a league license. I just want a 12 club competition. both Sydney clubs would take a lot of support down to Wollongong on away games. I think the crowds would be very decent down there. They have a great stadium for it, seems almost too perfect I wouldn't imagine the FFA would want to just go for an 'eleventh' team, as it would mean a bye. It would add no broadcast value. But 12 teams, as you say, would work. It might be their only choice. It'd mean a sixth match each week, and more bargaining power. I highly doubt it will be a 33 game season though. How do you feel about 22 games with a pre and post-season until we get to 14 and 16?
|
|
|
|
The Dudist
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
shallow hal wants a gal wrote:If a third Melbourne club is doable and has potential for growth then bring them in but give the Wollongong wolves an a league license. I just want a 12 club competition. both Sydney clubs would take a lot of support down to Wollongong on away games. I think the crowds would be very decent down there. They have a great stadium for it, seems almost too perfect I wouldn't imagine the FFA would want to just go for an 'eleventh' team, as it would mean a bye. It would add no broadcast value. But 12 teams, as you say, would work. It might be their only choice. It'd mean a sixth match each week, and more bargaining power.
|
|
|
SutherlandFan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 837,
Visits: 0
|
JP wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:The Gong or you're wrong. Why? The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there. It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO. Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong. A merged /shared club would be a massive failure. Unfortunately the metrics aren't there for Wollongong, the talent in the IPL would be close to that of NNSWNPL plus lots of great football infrastructure in the gong also.
|
|
|
RedshirtWilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Outonthefull wrote:3 Sydney 3 Melbourne would be ideal.
|
|
|
Outonthefull
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 501,
Visits: 0
|
3 Sydney 3 Melbourne would be ideal.
|
|
|
montywoodpeg
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 349,
Visits: 0
|
southmelb wrote:11.mvfc.11 wrote:South Melbourne with Samaras as marquee would average 10k in their first season. With the right execution, they could challenge Victory as the number one team in town within 5 years. Not in a million years would south overtake victory, honestly the idea is absurd even if we won the toilet seat every year. We wouldn't need samaras to average 10k, we had just under 4K on Sunday for park football, the national spotlight alone would tip us close to 10k. Absolutely, supporters would come out of the woodwork. I could see them having the angle tying their history and appeal of an "authentic" club, as such. Would expect a kind of hipster effect in Melbourne, people finding ties to South from before they were in the A-League. Really, with up to 4 derbies each season, you'd absolutely expect 10k.
|
|
|
southmelb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
11.mvfc.11 wrote:South Melbourne with Samaras as marquee would average 10k in their first season. With the right execution, they could challenge Victory as the number one team in town within 5 years. Not in a million years would south overtake victory, honestly the idea is absurd even if we won the toilet seat every year. We wouldn't need samaras to average 10k, we had just under 4K on Sunday for park football, the national spotlight alone would tip us close to 10k.
|
|
|
Pyramid Timmy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
spfc wrote:why the need for a new franchise?, there's a perfectly good A-League license ready and waiting to be bought, it's called the jets and a crap one but the Bakries want too much for it
|
|
|
shallow hal wants a gal
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
If a third Melbourne club is doable and has potential for growth then bring them in but give the Wollongong wolves an a league license. I just want a 12 club competition. both Sydney clubs would take a lot of support down to Wollongong on away games. I think the crowds would be very decent down there. They have a great stadium for it, seems almost too perfect
|
|
|
spfc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
why the need for a new franchise?, there's a perfectly good A-League license ready and waiting to be bought, it's called the jets
|
|
|
chillbilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.2K,
Visits: 0
|
scott21 wrote:BRFC_92 wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:JP wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:The Gong or you're wrong. Why? The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there. It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO. Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong. Possibly. The only thing that gives me hope is how great the FFA were in setting up WSW. Agree. Would love to see a Wollongong team. I reckon it would be a success. If we want a feel good regional story I say NQ. We don need another regional nsw team. Edited by scott21: 22/2/2016 11:07:46 PM I wouldn't classify Newcastle or Wollongong as regional NSW. They are major cities. Regional NSW is Coff Harbour, Dubbo, Griffith, ...
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
BRFC_92 wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:JP wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:The Gong or you're wrong. Why? The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there. It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO. Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong. Possibly. The only thing that gives me hope is how great the FFA were in setting up WSW. Agree. Would love to see a Wollongong team. I reckon it would be a success. If we want a feel good regional story I say NQ. We don need another regional nsw team. Edited by scott21: 22/2/2016 11:07:46 PM
|
|
|
BRFC_92
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:JP wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:The Gong or you're wrong. Why? The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there. It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO. Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong. Possibly. The only thing that gives me hope is how great the FFA were in setting up WSW. Agree. Would love to see a Wollongong team. I reckon it would be a success.
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
JP wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:The Gong or you're wrong. Why? The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there. It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO. Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong. Possibly. The only thing that gives me hope is how great the FFA were in setting up WSW.
|
|
|
JP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 0
|
aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:The Gong or you're wrong. Why? The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there. It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO. Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts Wollongong would be perfect but I'm sure the FFA would never let it happen. If it did it'd be a shithouse merged club shared between South Sydney and the Gong.
|
|
|
Steve07
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 18,
Visits: 0
|
I hope this is true! The stamoulis family are beautiful people, they are around south Melbourne a bit, so that's interesting.
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:The Gong or you're wrong. Why? The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there. It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO. Fair enough. But as someone mentioned in another thread (Benjamin maybe) it's more about corporate/sponsorship and tv ratings than attendance. I'd assume a 3rd Melbourne team would beat a Wollongong side on both counts
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
aufc_ole wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:The Gong or you're wrong. Why? The money in local football is already there. A strong football culture is already there. It's there, and nowhere else. That is the end of expansion for the foreseeable future IMO.
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:The Gong or you're wrong. Why?
|
|
|
RedshirtWilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
scott21 wrote:lukerobinho wrote:kidding themselves [youtube]qEja72NSg5Q[/youtube] Listened to the entire song didnt care about the context
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
lukerobinho wrote:kidding themselves [youtube]qEja72NSg5Q[/youtube]
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
southmelb wrote:Soft News wrote:Gold medal soft drink Stamoulis? The bloke that owns the East Preston Observation Deck on Bell Street, near Darebin Creek? Yes, should be said the family name would be nothing without his late father. Shocking news.
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
The Gong or you're wrong.
|
|
|
lukerobinho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
kidding themselves
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm -PB
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Would a 3rd VIC team help or hurt in terms of the Victory/ City/ new club establishing their supporter base?
Obviously, Victory is fine - they are the mass-support team. City- what is their identity? New club - if it was South, would that kill City? Or would it give them an identity in opposition to the new team? I don't know...
Edited by AzzaMarch: 22/2/2016 03:57:46 PM
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
Geelong.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!
|
|
|
Soft News
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
southmelb wrote:Soft News wrote:Gold medal soft drink Stamoulis? The bloke that owns the East Preston Observation Deck on Bell Street, near Darebin Creek? Yes, should be said the family name would be nothing without his late father. is the son any good, or is he living off the father's wealth?
|
|
|
southmelb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Soft News wrote:Gold medal soft drink Stamoulis? The bloke that owns the East Preston Observation Deck on Bell Street, near Darebin Creek? Yes, should be said the family name would be nothing without his late father.
|
|
|
Soft News
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Gold medal soft drink Stamoulis? The bloke that owns the East Preston Observation Deck on Bell Street, near Darebin Creek?
|
|
|