RedKat
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 1
|
This latest worrying turn of events comes amidst a backdrop of a dysfunctional relationship between recently appointed managing director and would-be-owner Daniel Cobb and his disaffected coach John Aloisi and football operations chief Craig Moore. It is also an echo of last year’s sequence of late payments to players and staff, which precipitated Football Federation Australia the threatening to seize back the club's A-League license from the Indonesian-based Bakrie Group unless less payments were made in a timely fashion and a number of other outstanding debts to creditors were settled.
Last year though, players and staff were forewarned of impending late payments – wages are due on the 15th of each month.On this occasion however, it’s understood that players were shocked to discover that on Monday no money had showed up in their accounts, with no explanation forthcoming from Cobb or the Bakrie Group.The issue looked to have been resolved last October when the Bakries – who are still actively still trying to offload the club – made good on their commitments to players and a number of creditors. Since then players have been paid on time.
However, the saga saw the club lose key midfielder Luke Brattan, who won a release over unpaid superannuation.
http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2016/08/15/brisbane-roar-crisis-mode-players-not-paid
|
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Gallop has told them to stop being naughty. That will do it. Worked a treat last year ..,, Well until March when they weren't paid again, but when he said it again then it worked ..... err, until now that is. But hey, he's said "stop it" three times in the last year, that should be dnough shouldn't it?
How spineless are the FFA not to act. They don't deserve a team in Brisbane, they really don't!
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+xGallop has told them to stop being naughty. That will do it. Worked a treat last year ..,, Well until March when they weren't paid again, but when he said it again then it worked ..... err, until now that is. But hey, he's said "stop it" three times in the last year, that should be dnough shouldn't it? How spineless are the FFA not to act. They don't deserve a team in Brisbane, they really don't! It's not about being spineless it's about $$$$. They simply don't have the money atm. And before people jump on here raving about the $500k spent on Cahill, firstly that isn't enough to save a club like Brisbane, and secondly no money put aside to promoting or marketing the game should be sacrificed for this. The FFA need to make the A-league as attractive as possible and obviously if they haven't taken over the club it's because they can't manage to do it. If they had hundreds or even more than 30-40 million in the bank it would be expected for them to act. But tell me, how should the FFA take over the licence if they are waiting for the next media deal to fill their pockets again? They would have to sacrifice money from Grass roots or raise playing fees. Something im sure you as many others on here are against.
|
|
|
Gazzza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xGallop has told them to stop being naughty. That will do it. Worked a treat last year ..,, Well until March when they weren't paid again, but when he said it again then it worked ..... err, until now that is. But hey, he's said "stop it" three times in the last year, that should be dnough shouldn't it? How spineless are the FFA not to act. They don't deserve a team in Brisbane, they really don't! It's not about being spineless it's about $$$$. They simply don't have the money atm. And before people jump on here raving about the $500k spent on Cahill, firstly that isn't enough to save a club like Brisbane, and secondly no money put aside to promoting or marketing the game should be sacrificed for this. The FFA need to make the A-league as attractive as possible and obviously if they haven't taken over the club it's because they can't manage to do it. If they had hundreds or even more than 30-40 million in the bank it would be expected for them to act. But tell me, how should the FFA take over the licence if they are waiting for the next media deal to fill their pockets again? They would have to sacrifice money from Grass roots or raise playing fees. Something im sure you as many others on here are against. And in the mean time before the next tv deal the club continues to be damaged beyond on repair, how is that going to help the next tv deal?
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xGallop has told them to stop being naughty. That will do it. Worked a treat last year ..,, Well until March when they weren't paid again, but when he said it again then it worked ..... err, until now that is. But hey, he's said "stop it" three times in the last year, that should be dnough shouldn't it? How spineless are the FFA not to act. They don't deserve a team in Brisbane, they really don't! It's not about being spineless it's about $$$$. They simply don't have the money atm. And before people jump on here raving about the $500k spent on Cahill, firstly that isn't enough to save a club like Brisbane, and secondly no money put aside to promoting or marketing the game should be sacrificed for this. The FFA need to make the A-league as attractive as possible and obviously if they haven't taken over the club it's because they can't manage to do it. If they had hundreds or even more than 30-40 million in the bank it would be expected for them to act. But tell me, how should the FFA take over the licence if they are waiting for the next media deal to fill their pockets again? They would have to sacrifice money from Grass roots or raise playing fees. Something im sure you as many others on here are against. And in the mean time before the next tv deal the club continues to be damaged beyond on repair, how is that going to help the next tv deal? The next TV deal largely relies on Brisbane participating first and foremost. There's no chance they will not. Whether someone gets paid a day or a week late is largely irrelevant. Not nice, can do without and terrible for some but not critical to the TV deal.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xGallop has told them to stop being naughty. That will do it. Worked a treat last year ..,, Well until March when they weren't paid again, but when he said it again then it worked ..... err, until now that is. But hey, he's said "stop it" three times in the last year, that should be dnough shouldn't it? How spineless are the FFA not to act. They don't deserve a team in Brisbane, they really don't! It's not about being spineless it's about $$$$. They simply don't have the money atm. And before people jump on here raving about the $500k spent on Cahill, firstly that isn't enough to save a club like Brisbane, and secondly no money put aside to promoting or marketing the game should be sacrificed for this. The FFA need to make the A-league as attractive as possible and obviously if they haven't taken over the club it's because they can't manage to do it. If they had hundreds or even more than 30-40 million in the bank it would be expected for them to act. But tell me, how should the FFA take over the licence if they are waiting for the next media deal to fill their pockets again? They would have to sacrifice money from Grass roots or raise playing fees. Something im sure you as many others on here are against. And in the mean time before the next tv deal the club continues to be damaged beyond on repair, how is that going to help the next tv deal? The next TV deal largely relies on Brisbane participating first and foremost. There's no chance they will not. Whether someone gets paid a day or a week late is largely irrelevant. Not nice, can do without and terrible for some but not critical to the TV deal.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xGallop has told them to stop being naughty. That will do it. Worked a treat last year ..,, Well until March when they weren't paid again, but when he said it again then it worked ..... err, until now that is. But hey, he's said "stop it" three times in the last year, that should be dnough shouldn't it? How spineless are the FFA not to act. They don't deserve a team in Brisbane, they really don't! It's not about being spineless it's about $$$$. They simply don't have the money atm. And before people jump on here raving about the $500k spent on Cahill, firstly that isn't enough to save a club like Brisbane, and secondly no money put aside to promoting or marketing the game should be sacrificed for this. The FFA need to make the A-league as attractive as possible and obviously if they haven't taken over the club it's because they can't manage to do it. If they had hundreds or even more than 30-40 million in the bank it would be expected for them to act. But tell me, how should the FFA take over the licence if they are waiting for the next media deal to fill their pockets again? They would have to sacrifice money from Grass roots or raise playing fees. Something im sure you as many others on here are against. And in the mean time before the next tv deal the club continues to be damaged beyond on repair, how is that going to help the next tv deal? The next TV deal largely relies on Brisbane participating first and foremost. There's no chance they will not. Whether someone gets paid a day or a week late is largely irrelevant. Not nice, can do without and terrible for some but not critical to the TV deal.  As others have said, your posts are shit.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+xGallop has told them to stop being naughty. That will do it. Worked a treat last year ..,, Well until March when they weren't paid again, but when he said it again then it worked ..... err, until now that is. But hey, he's said "stop it" three times in the last year, that should be dnough shouldn't it? How spineless are the FFA not to act. They don't deserve a team in Brisbane, they really don't! It's not about being spineless it's about $$$$. They simply don't have the money atm. And before people jump on here raving about the $500k spent on Cahill, firstly that isn't enough to save a club like Brisbane, and secondly no money put aside to promoting or marketing the game should be sacrificed for this. The FFA need to make the A-league as attractive as possible and obviously if they haven't taken over the club it's because they can't manage to do it. If they had hundreds or even more than 30-40 million in the bank it would be expected for them to act. But tell me, how should the FFA take over the licence if they are waiting for the next media deal to fill their pockets again? They would have to sacrifice money from Grass roots or raise playing fees. Something im sure you as many others on here are against. And in the mean time before the next tv deal the club continues to be damaged beyond on repair, how is that going to help the next tv deal? If the club is able to field players on game day then Fox Sports is happy. The same excuses could have been made last year, yet ratings for Brisbane games weren't greatly affected by this. Attendances and memberships on the other hand were affected. Neither of which have a real influence on the next broadcast deal. Yu just have to look at some NRL clubs to tell you that. It's the ratings that matter when it comes to tv deals obviously, and no evidence of Brisbane Roar games spiraling downwards in the tv department. Perhaps maybe an increase due to some fans staying home to watch rather than at the game itself. Point im making is that the FFA will do whatever is possible to keep Bakries in paying the bills even if they pay late on occasion. Once the new deal is in and the FFA is more cashed up they will be in a much better position to take over with minimal risk.
|
|
|
Swarth
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.9K,
Visits: 0
|
the sad thing is this post could have been from 5 years ago
|
|
|
RedKat
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 1
|
+xthe sad thing is this post could have been from 5 years ago I was initially going with a title "Another Preseason. Another Roar players not being paid article"
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
Is this the kultcha paulc was on about?
|
|
|
walnuts
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Deary me - what a shamozzle
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIs this the kultcha paulc was on about? Circus Kulccchhaaaa -PB
|
|
|
salmonfc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.6K,
Visits: 0
|
J-Mac should follow Luke's example and leave. He'd at least get paid on time at Adelaide United.
For the first time, but certainly not the last, I began to believe that Arsenals moods and fortunes somehow reflected my own. - Hornby
|
|
|
Gayfish
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xJ-Mac should follow Luke's example and leave. He'd at least get paid on time at Adelaide United. Be going to Victory before shitty old Adelaide.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
And then he...he said it was a few cash flow issues!  -PB
|
|
|
SWandP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Methinks Cobb just got told to put up or go away. Whatever deal he's done with the Bakries is meaningless if they've got nothing to sell. Phone will be at pawn shop this week.
Prediction: 442 to explode in sympathy with him like they did for TInkler.
|
|
|
bubbling11
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Wait a second, if this was a certain other club there would be the "kick them out" calls by now..................
|
|
|
bluebird
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Lucky we have a salary cap Despite clubs constantly hitting financial crisis and ownership problems, we still get all the benefits of not having big players and big teams in our league One balances out the other
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+xLucky we have a salary cap Despite clubs constantly hitting financial crisis and ownership problems, we still get all the benefits of not having big players and big teams in our league One balances out the other Sydney, WSW and Victory don't have cash problems. Why aren't they spending big on marquees. Nothing is stopping them. Certainly not the salary cap as they have 3 spots to fill. Yet they aren't spending much. This tells me that getting rid of the salary cap would do very little on bringing in big players or creating huge clubs. Once we max out the marquees properly for at least 2-3 clubs in the league we can talk about dropping the cap.
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
The FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go.
The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?
None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning.
Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there.
|
|
|
SWandP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go. The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning. Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there. LOL let's go with an analogy: How many times should the bank allow you to make a late home repayment before kicking you out? They do have a duty to their shareholders. Truth is it's better for the bank and the lendee to keep them in the house and make the payments. It costs less and the profit still comes home. Everybody wins. Second best is to find a new buyer for the home and get the owner to bear the costs and problems of selling it on. Everybody wins but the original owner loses value in the asset. Last choice is repossession and the bank having to find a new owner and wrap up the affairs of the original. Bank loses money and the owner gets properly screwed. Losses all round. Same with a football club franchise. It would be even more costly than a house repo because some high voltage lathered up lawyers would be involved. Throw in the problem that FIFA rules prevent FFA from holding more than one club at a time and you had them in the position of having to shut down one club last year if they moved. Newcastle Jets would have been thrown in the bin and that would have been disastrous. The only outcome here that promises a bright and golden future for football is that a softly softly approach with a big stick works. You blokes should be absolutely over-joyed that FFA has acted sensibly and maturely. Ask the people of Townsville, Gold Coast and Auckland what it's like to have it all taken away. Too fukn precious.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
The FFA need to step in and pay the players directly. It's a joke that the Roar face no sanctions. I feel sorry for the players that need to support their families.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go. The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning. Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there. LOL let's go with an analogy: How many times should the bank allow you to make a late home repayment before kicking you out? They do have a duty to their shareholders. Truth is it's better for the bank and the lendee to keep them in the house and make the payments. It costs less and the profit still comes home. Everybody wins. Second best is to find a new buyer for the home and get the owner to bear the costs and problems of selling it on. Everybody wins but the original owner loses value in the asset. Last choice is repossession and the bank having to find a new owner and wrap up the affairs of the original. Bank loses money and the owner gets properly screwed. Losses all round. Same with a football club franchise. It would be even more costly than a house repo because some high voltage lathered up lawyers would be involved. Throw in the problem that FIFA rules prevent FFA from holding more than one club at a time and you had them in the position of having to shut down one club last year if they moved. Newcastle Jets would have been thrown in the bin and that would have been disastrous. The only outcome here that promises a bright and golden future for football is that a softly softly approach with a big stick works. You blokes should be absolutely over-joyed that FFA has acted sensibly and maturely. Ask the people of Townsville, Gold Coast and Auckland what it's like to have it all taken away. Too fukn precious. Bang on with your analogy but wouldn't say too precious. Roar fans have higher expectations, imagine if these lil' ol cash flow issues distracts the team again like last season and we end up a poultry 3rd on the ladder again? Can't happen for the big and most successful club like Brisbane Roar. We deserve better.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
FullBack4
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 697,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThe FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go. The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning. Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there. LOL let's go with an analogy: How many times should the bank allow you to make a late home repayment before kicking you out? They do have a duty to their shareholders. Truth is it's better for the bank and the lendee to keep them in the house and make the payments. It costs less and the profit still comes home. Everybody wins. Second best is to find a new buyer for the home and get the owner to bear the costs and problems of selling it on. Everybody wins but the original owner loses value in the asset. Last choice is repossession and the bank having to find a new owner and wrap up the affairs of the original. Bank loses money and the owner gets properly screwed. Losses all round. Same with a football club franchise. It would be even more costly than a house repo because some high voltage lathered up lawyers would be involved. Throw in the problem that FIFA rules prevent FFA from holding more than one club at a time and you had them in the position of having to shut down one club last year if they moved. Newcastle Jets would have been thrown in the bin and that would have been disastrous. The only outcome here that promises a bright and golden future for football is that a softly softly approach with a big stick works. You blokes should be absolutely over-joyed that FFA has acted sensibly and maturely. Ask the people of Townsville, Gold Coast and Auckland what it's like to have it all taken away. Too fukn precious. Bang on with your analogy but wouldn't say too precious. Roar fans have higher expectations, imagine if these lil' ol cash flow issues distracts the team again like last season and we end up a poultry 3rd on the ladder again? Can't happen for the big and most successful club like Brisbane Roar. We deserve better. The Analogy is not "bang on" ... if the bank ran a network of franchised homes that you live the analogy might make sense. No one really likes the FF's franchise model so its frustrating when the powers that they have under that arrangement don't get used to protect both BRFC and the HAL from all this bullshit
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+xThe FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go. The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning. Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there. LOL let's go with an analogy: How many times should the bank allow you to make a late home repayment before kicking you out? They do have a duty to their shareholders. Truth is it's better for the bank and the lendee to keep them in the house and make the payments. It costs less and the profit still comes home. Everybody wins. Second best is to find a new buyer for the home and get the owner to bear the costs and problems of selling it on. Everybody wins but the original owner loses value in the asset. Last choice is repossession and the bank having to find a new owner and wrap up the affairs of the original. Bank loses money and the owner gets properly screwed. Losses all round. Same with a football club franchise. It would be even more costly than a house repo because some high voltage lathered up lawyers would be involved. Throw in the problem that FIFA rules prevent FFA from holding more than one club at a time and you had them in the position of having to shut down one club last year if they moved. Newcastle Jets would have been thrown in the bin and that would have been disastrous. The only outcome here that promises a bright and golden future for football is that a softly softly approach with a big stick works. You blokes should be absolutely over-joyed that FFA has acted sensibly and maturely. Ask the people of Townsville, Gold Coast and Auckland what it's like to have it all taken away. Too fukn precious. Again spot on!
|
|
|
RyanM
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go. The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning. Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there. LOL let's go with an analogy: How many times should the bank allow you to make a late home repayment before kicking you out? They do have a duty to their shareholders. Truth is it's better for the bank and the lendee to keep them in the house and make the payments. It costs less and the profit still comes home. Everybody wins. Second best is to find a new buyer for the home and get the owner to bear the costs and problems of selling it on. Everybody wins but the original owner loses value in the asset. Last choice is repossession and the bank having to find a new owner and wrap up the affairs of the original. Bank loses money and the owner gets properly screwed. Losses all round. Same with a football club franchise. It would be even more costly than a house repo because some high voltage lathered up lawyers would be involved. Throw in the problem that FIFA rules prevent FFA from holding more than one club at a time and you had them in the position of having to shut down one club last year if they moved. Newcastle Jets would have been thrown in the bin and that would have been disastrous. The only outcome here that promises a bright and golden future for football is that a softly softly approach with a big stick works. You blokes should be absolutely over-joyed that FFA has acted sensibly and maturely. Ask the people of Townsville, Gold Coast and Auckland what it's like to have it all taken away. Too fukn precious. Was going to say the same thing, but you did a better job of it. This year at least the FFA can take over the Roar if things drag on which they couldn't do last year, albeit with disastrous costs (the jets cost millions)
|
|
|
Gayfish
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThe FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go. The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning. Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there. LOL let's go with an analogy: How many times should the bank allow you to make a late home repayment before kicking you out? They do have a duty to their shareholders. Truth is it's better for the bank and the lendee to keep them in the house and make the payments. It costs less and the profit still comes home. Everybody wins. Second best is to find a new buyer for the home and get the owner to bear the costs and problems of selling it on. Everybody wins but the original owner loses value in the asset. Last choice is repossession and the bank having to find a new owner and wrap up the affairs of the original. Bank loses money and the owner gets properly screwed. Losses all round. Same with a football club franchise. It would be even more costly than a house repo because some high voltage lathered up lawyers would be involved. Throw in the problem that FIFA rules prevent FFA from holding more than one club at a time and you had them in the position of having to shut down one club last year if they moved. Newcastle Jets would have been thrown in the bin and that would have been disastrous. The only outcome here that promises a bright and golden future for football is that a softly softly approach with a big stick works. You blokes should be absolutely over-joyed that FFA has acted sensibly and maturely. Ask the people of Townsville, Gold Coast and Auckland what it's like to have it all taken away. Too fukn precious. Was going to say the same thing, but you did a better job of it. This year at least the FFA can take over the Roar if things drag on which they couldn't do last year, albeit with disastrous costs (the jets cost millions) By the time they take over Nix will have more fans than Roar.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThe FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go. The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning. Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there. LOL let's go with an analogy: How many times should the bank allow you to make a late home repayment before kicking you out? They do have a duty to their shareholders. Truth is it's better for the bank and the lendee to keep them in the house and make the payments. It costs less and the profit still comes home. Everybody wins. Second best is to find a new buyer for the home and get the owner to bear the costs and problems of selling it on. Everybody wins but the original owner loses value in the asset. Last choice is repossession and the bank having to find a new owner and wrap up the affairs of the original. Bank loses money and the owner gets properly screwed. Losses all round. Same with a football club franchise. It would be even more costly than a house repo because some high voltage lathered up lawyers would be involved. Throw in the problem that FIFA rules prevent FFA from holding more than one club at a time and you had them in the position of having to shut down one club last year if they moved. Newcastle Jets would have been thrown in the bin and that would have been disastrous. The only outcome here that promises a bright and golden future for football is that a softly softly approach with a big stick works. You blokes should be absolutely over-joyed that FFA has acted sensibly and maturely. Ask the people of Townsville, Gold Coast and Auckland what it's like to have it all taken away. Too fukn precious. Was going to say the same thing, but you did a better job of it. This year at least the FFA can take over the Roar if things drag on which they couldn't do last year, albeit with disastrous costs (the jets cost millions) Last time FFA took over Roar they made $10 million. Covered their costs at Newcastle with $5 million in their bank. Not bad of a disaster!
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThe FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go. The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning. Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there. LOL let's go with an analogy: How many times should the bank allow you to make a late home repayment before kicking you out? They do have a duty to their shareholders. Truth is it's better for the bank and the lendee to keep them in the house and make the payments. It costs less and the profit still comes home. Everybody wins. Second best is to find a new buyer for the home and get the owner to bear the costs and problems of selling it on. Everybody wins but the original owner loses value in the asset. Last choice is repossession and the bank having to find a new owner and wrap up the affairs of the original. Bank loses money and the owner gets properly screwed. Losses all round. Same with a football club franchise. It would be even more costly than a house repo because some high voltage lathered up lawyers would be involved. Throw in the problem that FIFA rules prevent FFA from holding more than one club at a time and you had them in the position of having to shut down one club last year if they moved. Newcastle Jets would have been thrown in the bin and that would have been disastrous. The only outcome here that promises a bright and golden future for football is that a softly softly approach with a big stick works. You blokes should be absolutely over-joyed that FFA has acted sensibly and maturely. Ask the people of Townsville, Gold Coast and Auckland what it's like to have it all taken away. Too fukn precious. Was going to say the same thing, but you did a better job of it. This year at least the FFA can take over the Roar if things drag on which they couldn't do last year, albeit with disastrous costs (the jets cost millions) Last time FFA took over Roar they made $10 million. Covered their costs at Newcastle with $5 million in their bank. Not bad of a disaster! Oh there you are! lol
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+xThe FFA have failed on this issue several times in the past, Gallop needs to go. The defence of the FFA in the past has been "they can't act as long as players are getting paid" well they're not getting paid, again, so what excuse do the FFA have now?None - they need to start the process of taking the Bakries licence back this morning. Gallop will survive but he shouldn't, he now represents all that's wrong with football administration in this country. Spineless and disconnected from reality. Fire his arse in the afternoon and get a football person in there. You are clueless. Tell me how would you take over a business with hardly any capital? Would love to hear your thoughts on how you would manage to pay a large payroll with no real funds in the bank. Perhaps you would borrow money to fund this venture, but I guess the question is who would fund you when the risks of actually defaulting is so high for a football club. So where do you turn next? Start doubling or tripling association fees? Charge 3 times the amount to Socceroos games? Kill off the PFA so you don;t have to agree to the ludicrous 30% cut in the next media deal? Tell me how do you think the FFA could fund this? Because that's what the problem is atm. It's a lack of funds, not a lack of will like you seem to make it out to be. Gallop isn;t the one pulling the strings on this one. He's not in charge the FFA coffers. He gets told how much he can spend and that's about it.
|
|
|
Jong Gabe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
The poor players, some of the longer serving ones must be sick of this. Another preseason, another money drama.....
|
|
|
crimsoncrusoe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Considering we have a salary cap and that is covered by FFA payments,maybe it's time for FFA to pay players under the cap directly. In future those paid as Marquees should at least have a bond lodged with FFA to draw from in cases of non payment.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
+xConsidering we have a salary cap and that is covered by FFA payments,maybe it's time for FFA to pay players under the cap directly.In future those paid as Marquees should be at least have a bond lodged with FFA to draw from in cases of non payment. Exactly. The simplest and best idea. All clubs submit their contracts and the FFA pays them directly. At the moment it's a double handed, paper-shuffling exercise.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xConsidering we have a salary cap and that is covered by FFA payments,maybe it's time for FFA to pay players under the cap directly.In future those paid as Marquees should be at least have a bond lodged with FFA to draw from in cases of non payment. Exactly. The simplest and best idea. All clubs submit their contracts and the FFA pays them directly. At the moment it's a double handed, paper-shuffling exercise. Yep, excellent idea.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
aussie pride
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Out of interest when does the FFA distribute the TV money? Is it one lump sum or monthly?
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|

Yeah, all players should just sign contracts with the FFA like in the USA. The FFA can move around players to make the league more even year to year......
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
+x
Yeah, all players should just sign contracts with the FFA like in the USA. The FFA can move around players to make the league more even year to year...... No you peanut. They're still contracted to their clubs. The club just submits their contracts or payment schedules to the FFA and the FFA pays them directly with money that would have been granted to the clubs in any case.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x
Yeah, all players should just sign contracts with the FFA like in the USA. The FFA can move around players to make the league more even year to year...... No you peanut. They're still contracted to their clubs. The club just submits their contracts or payment schedules to the FFA and the FFA pays them directly with money that would have been granted to the clubs in any case. The scottyboys are struggling a bit these days lol
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
So clubs should take off ca $2.5 mil in revenue off their books? Just like that, click of the fingers.
|
|
|
scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Cash Flow issues aye Pauly?
|
|
|
Gazzza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Do you even support an A-League Team SWandP?
|
|
|
FullBack4
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 697,
Visits: 0
|
There's nothing new in this, can any BRFC fan say they didn't expect this to happen at some point?
Cobb or Bakries or the coffee club/pizza boys - there is one consistent factor in all of this that's not the owners - and it is BRFC who despite all the success on the field and decent crowds off it, can not survive commercially. That is perhaps the question the FFA should address because it seems to me a succession of owners come in with grand plans and exit through the same door
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThere's nothing new in this, can any BRFC fan say they didn't expect this to happen at some point? Cobb or Bakries or the coffee club/pizza boys - there is one consistent factor in all of this that's not the owners - and it is BRFC who despite all the success on the field and decent crowds off it, can not survive commercially. That is perhaps the question the FFA should address because it seems to me a succession of owners come in with grand plans and exit through the same door How is it not surviving when all the bills have always been paid and at the moment payments being a mere 1 day late lol. Huge stadium fees is a major disadvantage but getting the right owner is the real issue.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Mr B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+xThere's nothing new in this, can any BRFC fan say they didn't expect this to happen at some point? Cobb or Bakries or the coffee club/pizza boys - there is one consistent factor in all of this that's not the owners - and it is BRFC who despite all the success on the field and decent crowds off it, can not survive commercially. That is perhaps the question the FFA should address because it seems to me a succession of owners come in with grand plans and exit through the same door How is it not surviving when all the bills have always been paid and at the moment payments being a mere 1 day late lol. Huge stadium fees is a major disadvantage but getting the right owner is the real issue. The only way we can ever beat the huge stadium fees is if we were taken over by a rich club like Manchester City, other than that anyone coming in will always have a hard time paying the bills at Suncorp. We need to move but there is no where to move, even if we went to Ballymore I hear it it still quite expensive for a run down stadium and then we would probably lose fans because there is no direct access by train like there is for Suncorp. I'm all over it all to be honest. How can we as fans support a club who cannot even support their own players,staff and continually make bad decisions off the field. While I have always defended Roar when others call us a joke, but honestly there is no other word for it at the moment, we are a joke, off the field.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThere's nothing new in this, can any BRFC fan say they didn't expect this to happen at some point? Cobb or Bakries or the coffee club/pizza boys - there is one consistent factor in all of this that's not the owners - and it is BRFC who despite all the success on the field and decent crowds off it, can not survive commercially. That is perhaps the question the FFA should address because it seems to me a succession of owners come in with grand plans and exit through the same door How is it not surviving when all the bills have always been paid and at the moment payments being a mere 1 day late lol. Huge stadium fees is a major disadvantage but getting the right owner is the real issue. The only way we can ever beat the huge stadium fees is if we were taken over by a rich club like Manchester City, other than that anyone coming in will always have a hard time paying the bills at Suncorp. We need to move but there is no where to move, even if we went to Ballymore I hear it it still quite expensive for a run down stadium and then we would probably lose fans because there is no direct access by train like there is for Suncorp. I'm all over it all to be honest. How can we as fans support a club who cannot even support their own players,staff and continually make bad decisions off the field. While I have always defended Roar when others call us a joke, but honestly there is no other word for it at the moment, we are a joke, off the field. I'm sure it has always been the intention of BRFC management and staff to pay on time but if the money comes in from Indonesia a little late it boils down to the owners. Hang fire Mr Brisbane, it will come good.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
crimsoncrusoe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Keep up the excellent trolling Fullback. What you forget is the absolute contempt with which fans have been treated by management over the years. If you want to call Roar fans precious go ahead.But I for one believe I have the right to watch a game on tv ,if I want to ,rather than pay exhorbitant membership fees for games played at inconvenient random times. What clubs and FFA have to realise is they don't have a right to fans attending games.Like most people I have a life outside of football.There are many things I can do and if watching my team live becomes a pain in the rear end ,I am less likely to turn up .I feel no guilt whatsoever in watching HAL on tv.
|
|
|
scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
How can a player get paid by the FFA but have a contract with the club? The club has to pay the player after the FFA has paid them or have a contract directly with the FFA.
Also, if the FFA does not pay the clubs to pay the players this will effect their revenues.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
LOL No wonder paulc frothes the FFA so much. They always buy his club out of trouble. What a debacle of an organisation.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
The junior jerk circle one after the other lol.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe junior jerk circle one after the other lol. Yet you're in the middle...
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe junior jerk circle one after the other lol. Yet you're in the middle... Resort Bukkake. -PB
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThe junior jerk circle one after the other lol. Yet you're in the middle... Resort Bukkake. -PB You're going all limp wristy today PB. lol
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThe junior jerk circle one after the other lol. Yet you're in the middle... Resort Bukkake. -PB Rofl I edited my post in fear of a JoFFA ban. PTJD Post traumatic JoFFA disorder.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
You guys want players to be subcontractors of the FFA not employees of clubs. I will never think that is a good idea.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
+xYou guys want players to be subcontractors of the FFA not employees of clubs. I will never think that is a good idea. Are you seriously that dense? I have $3.00 for a muffin. I can give it to you to pay the lady behind the counter and hope you don't hold onto that money or spend it or I can pay the lady direct. What do you think is the most efficient method?
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYou guys want players to be subcontractors of the FFA not employees of clubs. I will never think that is a good idea. Are you seriously that dense? I have $3.00 for a muffin. I can give it to you to pay the lady behind the counter and hope you don't hold onto that money or spend it or I can pay the lady direct. What do you think is the most efficient method? The scotties have the corner store mentality so you might need a few more threads to get that through to them.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xYou guys want players to be subcontractors of the FFA not employees of clubs. I will never think that is a good idea. Are you seriously that dense? I have $3.00 for a muffin. I can give it to you to pay the lady behind the counter and hope you don't hold onto that money or spend it or I can pay the lady direct. What do you think is the most efficient method? The scotties have the corner store mentality so you might need a few more threads to get that through to them. So when the FFA just gives this money to players what/how do they write the expenses in their system? yeah nah, *wages*. That would make them employees of the FFA. or maybe in no accounting rules land you can just write it off as a gift, and they volunteer to play at clubs. If you want them to write it as an expense the players better start establishing companies.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xYou guys want players to be subcontractors of the FFA not employees of clubs. I will never think that is a good idea. Are you seriously that dense? I have $3.00 for a muffin. I can give it to you to pay the lady behind the counter and hope you don't hold onto that money or spend it or I can pay the lady direct. What do you think is the most efficient method? The scotties have the corner store mentality so you might need a few more threads to get that through to them. So when the FFA just gives this money to players what/how do they write the expenses in their system? yeah nah, *wages*. That would make them employees of the FFA. or maybe in no accounting rules land you can just write it off as a gift, and they volunteer to play at clubs. If you want them to write it as an expense the players better start establishing companies. Oh God :blush:
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xYou guys want players to be subcontractors of the FFA not employees of clubs. I will never think that is a good idea. Are you seriously that dense? I have $3.00 for a muffin. I can give it to you to pay the lady behind the counter and hope you don't hold onto that money or spend it or I can pay the lady direct. What do you think is the most efficient method? The scotties have the corner store mentality so you might need a few more threads to get that through to them. So when the FFA just gives this money to players what/how do they write the expenses in their system? yeah nah, *wages*. That would make them employees of the FFA. or maybe in no accounting rules land you can just write it off as a gift, and they volunteer to play at clubs. If you want them to write it as an expense the players better start establishing companies. Oh God :blush: Im sorry , but you agree with a guy who wants to pay for my muffin and thinks that it is ok that I just put th receipt on my books. If you pay for me, I cant put anything in my books. :sick:
You are the ones promoting dodgy business.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xYou guys want players to be subcontractors of the FFA not employees of clubs. I will never think that is a good idea. Are you seriously that dense? I have $3.00 for a muffin. I can give it to you to pay the lady behind the counter and hope you don't hold onto that money or spend it or I can pay the lady direct. What do you think is the most efficient method? The scotties have the corner store mentality so you might need a few more threads to get that through to them. So when the FFA just gives this money to players what/how do they write the expenses in their system? yeah nah, *wages*. That would make them employees of the FFA. or maybe in no accounting rules land you can just write it off as a gift, and they volunteer to play at clubs. If you want them to write it as an expense the players better start establishing companies. Oh God :blush: Im sorry , but you agree with a guy who wants to pay for my muffin and thinks that it is ok that I just put th receipt on my books. If you pay for me, I cant put anything in my books. :sick:
You are the ones promoting dodgy business. You dope. I've saved you a shitload work and in book keeping and accounting fees because now you don't have 23 contracted players you need to pay fortnightly. And what's this claiming an non-existent expense you are on about? Have you ever run a business before?
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou guys want players to be subcontractors of the FFA not employees of clubs. I will never think that is a good idea. Are you seriously that dense? I have $3.00 for a muffin. I can give it to you to pay the lady behind the counter and hope you don't hold onto that money or spend it or I can pay the lady direct. What do you think is the most efficient method? The scotties have the corner store mentality so you might need a few more threads to get that through to them. So when the FFA just gives this money to players what/how do they write the expenses in their system? yeah nah, *wages*. That would make them employees of the FFA. or maybe in no accounting rules land you can just write it off as a gift, and they volunteer to play at clubs. If you want them to write it as an expense the players better start establishing companies. Oh God :blush: Im sorry , but you agree with a guy who wants to pay for my muffin and thinks that it is ok that I just put th receipt on my books. If you pay for me, I cant put anything in my books. :sick:
You are the ones promoting dodgy business. You dope. I've saved you a shitload work and in book keeping and accounting fees because now you don't have 23 contracted players you need to pay fortnightly. And what's this claiming an non-existent expense you are on about? Have you ever run a business before? :hehe:
wot? So who do the players have contracts with? They would have to have them with the FFA under what you just said Dope. Hey Dope you are not dope. You said before that they would still be contracted with the clubs dope. Like I said, you are anti footbal if you think the FFA should contract and pay the players. What you are suggesting - players having contracts with clubs but being paid directly from the FFA doesnt make sense.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYou guys want players to be subcontractors of the FFA not employees of clubs. I will never think that is a good idea. Are you seriously that dense? I have $3.00 for a muffin. I can give it to you to pay the lady behind the counter and hope you don't hold onto that money or spend it or I can pay the lady direct. What do you think is the most efficient method? Why would you not also give me money to pay for cookies (office staff) when you give me money for muffins?
|
|
|
Bundoora B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
my understanding was that the ffa was reluctant to move on the bakries with newcastle unresolved. time is now. the club deserves better than this. bakries out.
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
Standard
|
|
|
lolitsbigmic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Before i go off the rails. Given the they are paid on the 15th, could it just be a bank transfer thing. They did it late, not going to appear till today.
If its not that, i'm not sure how many breaches the FFA are going to allow. Paying staff on time is vital for moral and a good indication of business health.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Bye bye Brisbane!
|
|
|
WSF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBye bye Brisbane!  Stick to extra time, your posts are shit.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
All we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :)
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. Serious backing which don't pay their bills?
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc?
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? The truth must hurt you scottyboy.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL..
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol
|
|
|
WSF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol Wow you actually laughed at your own shit joke.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol Wow you actually laughed at your own shit joke. Stick to your Kebabs mate. I can't help your butthurst for getting rolled in Adelaide. You can try this if it will help.
|
|
|
WSF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol Wow you actually laughed at your own shit joke. Stick to your Kebabs mate. I can't help your butthurst for getting rolled in Adelaide. You can try this if it will help.  You actually think your pic is funny don't you, oh you really are pathetic. I'm surprised you even still post on here after leaving the Adelaide United Bandwagon, we can meet up if you want or will you chicken out like last time?
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol Wow you actually laughed at your own shit joke. Stick to your Kebabs mate. I can't help your butthurst for getting rolled in Adelaide. You can try this if it will help.  You actually think your pic is funny don't you, oh you really are pathetic. I'm surprised you even still post on here after leaving the Adelaide United Bandwagon, we can meet up if you want or will you chicken out like last time? Just trying to help you with your little problem buddy. Always trying to help. I'm a West Adelaide supporter through thick and thin buddy and have a history with this club as a player. I haven't left AUFC but I am not parochial about it and that is quite fair enough. It was fantastic how they beat WSW at the final. WSW were never really in it from start to finish. Clearly inferior!
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.  Im not obsessed with all things greek though. I got labeled a grecofile by ljubo pathetic... sure i defended them against some pretty overt racism going on around here... but i dont initiate conversation about greeks and the nsl like you do... like i said your level of obsession is bizarre....pathological.... Unless by your meme youre implying that im as old and decrepit as you are..in which case i can assure you im roughly the age of your grandkids.
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.  Im not obsessed with all things greek though. I got labeled a grecofile by ljubo pathetic... sure i defended them against some pretty overt racism going on around here... but i dont initiate conversation about greeks and the nsl like you do... like i said your level of obsession is bizarre....pathological.... Unless by your meme youre implying that im as old and decrepit as you are..in which case i can assure you im roughly the age of your grandkids. Sometimes you got to fight racism with fire. There is a lot of overt racism here. Anyhow, Brisbane is in its last throws! Good riddance to bad rubbish too! The sooner Brisbane dies, the quicker others like SMFC get in!
|
|
|
WSF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.  Im not obsessed with all things greek though. I got labeled a grecofile by ljubo pathetic... sure i defended them against some pretty overt racism going on around here... but i dont initiate conversation about greeks and the nsl like you do... like i said your level of obsession is bizarre....pathological.... Unless by your meme youre implying that im as old and decrepit as you are..in which case i can assure you im roughly the age of your grandkids. Sometimes you got to fight racism with fire. There is a lot of overt racism here. Anyhow, Brisbane is in its last throws! Good riddance to bad rubbish too! The sooner Brisbane dies, the quicker others like SMFC get in! You really are a dead set loser, West Adelaide is shit by the way.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.  Im not obsessed with all things greek though. I got labeled a grecofile by ljubo pathetic... sure i defended them against some pretty overt racism going on around here... but i dont initiate conversation about greeks and the nsl like you do... like i said your level of obsession is bizarre....pathological.... Unless by your meme youre implying that im as old and decrepit as you are..in which case i can assure you im roughly the age of your grandkids. Sometimes you got to fight racism with fire. There is a lot of overt racism here. Anyhow, Brisbane is in its last throws! Good riddance to bad rubbish too! The sooner Brisbane dies, the quicker others like SMFC get in! You really are a dead set loser, West Adelaide is shit by the way. Oh, little immature brat! That butt of yours must still be hurting! Awe! I told you to use that ointment! What is it with the youth these days? No brains, lazy and no Football Kulcha!
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.  Im not obsessed with all things greek though. I got labeled a grecofile by ljubo pathetic... sure i defended them against some pretty overt racism going on around here... but i dont initiate conversation about greeks and the nsl like you do... like i said your level of obsession is bizarre....pathological.... Unless by your meme youre implying that im as old and decrepit as you are..in which case i can assure you im roughly the age of your grandkids. You are obsessed, like a drunk in denial. It seems their labelling about you was right and where is that black kettle again lol. Now about your constant fuck the FFA, down with the HAL, bring in the insular mono ethnic clubs and all their fiery kulcha etc.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.  Im not obsessed with all things greek though. I got labeled a grecofile by ljubo pathetic... sure i defended them against some pretty overt racism going on around here... but i dont initiate conversation about greeks and the nsl like you do... like i said your level of obsession is bizarre....pathological.... Unless by your meme youre implying that im as old and decrepit as you are..in which case i can assure you im roughly the age of your grandkids. You are obsessed, like a drunk in denial. It seems their labelling about you was right and where is that black kettle again lol. Now about your constant fuck the FFA, down with the HAL, bring in the insular mono ethnic clubs and all their fiery kulcha etc. Nutjob.
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.  Im not obsessed with all things greek though. I got labeled a grecofile by ljubo pathetic... sure i defended them against some pretty overt racism going on around here... but i dont initiate conversation about greeks and the nsl like you do... like i said your level of obsession is bizarre....pathological.... Unless by your meme youre implying that im as old and decrepit as you are..in which case i can assure you im roughly the age of your grandkids. You are obsessed, like a drunk in denial. It seems their labelling about you was right and where is that black kettle again lol. Now about your constant fuck the FFA, down with the HAL, bring in the insular mono ethnic clubs and all their fiery kulcha etc. Nutjob.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.  Im not obsessed with all things greek though. I got labeled a grecofile by ljubo pathetic... sure i defended them against some pretty overt racism going on around here... but i dont initiate conversation about greeks and the nsl like you do... like i said your level of obsession is bizarre....pathological.... Unless by your meme youre implying that im as old and decrepit as you are..in which case i can assure you im roughly the age of your grandkids. You are obsessed, like a drunk in denial. It seems their labelling about you was right and where is that black kettle again lol. Now about your constant fuck the FFA, down with the HAL, bring in the insular mono ethnic clubs and all their fiery kulcha etc. Nutjob.  Not very mature behavior for someone in their 60s... your grandkids would be ashamed.
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Isn't Brisbane owned by an Indonesian Bakery! lol That at the time of purchase were worth Billions. So no not really ur typical bakery store lol Maybe Acne should tell us how West Adelaide Hellas stayed viable in the NSL......oh wait they didn't. lol Double whammy. "hellas" and "nsl"... And so the obsession continues... you really have to stop gravitating toward that which you secretly desire most...ie to have a Greek man sort you out Acne is a West Adelaide Hellas fan, your sig originated in Greece and you both want the downfall of the HAL so I can see why you're touchy lol. Not touchy at all... i just think your level of obsession is unhealthy... You dont want to give yourself a hernia at your age.  Im not obsessed with all things greek though. I got labeled a grecofile by ljubo pathetic... sure i defended them against some pretty overt racism going on around here... but i dont initiate conversation about greeks and the nsl like you do... like i said your level of obsession is bizarre....pathological.... Unless by your meme youre implying that im as old and decrepit as you are..in which case i can assure you im roughly the age of your grandkids. You are obsessed, like a drunk in denial. It seems their labelling about you was right and where is that black kettle again lol. Now about your constant fuck the FFA, down with the HAL, bring in the insular mono ethnic clubs and all their fiery kulcha etc. Nutjob.  Not very mature behavior for someone in their 60s... your grandkids would be ashamed. There's no better way to respond to hypocrite comments without typing words.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first?
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Bloody agree 100% The quicker we get back to the grassroots and have an open slather, the better. The reason why they don't want it is because they are worried. It's only a matter of time. If there are no improvements, Foxtell will give up and then the HAL will be in dire trouble. Foxtell isn't doing that great either with Netflix on the scene. Soon mate, there will be huge changes and many people here are not gonna like it.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Bloody agree 100% The quicker we get back to the grassroots and have an open slather, the better. The reason why they don't want it is because they are worried. It's only a matter of time. If there are no improvements, Foxtell will give up and then the HAL will be in dire trouble. Foxtell isn't doing that great either with Netflix on the scene. Soon mate, there will be huge changes and many people here are not gonna like it. And all you ex NSL types will be rejoicing wont you. Fuck if football goes back to what it was we will be worse than the NBL. We have 3 types of football fans in this country. 1) The Euro snobs that will only watch the a-league if big international marquees come or if the league gets really strong. 2) A-league fans that may also follow international leagues 3) Ex NSL bitters that whinge that the A-league is shit and would prefer to see corner store organisations running the clubs in order to bring those good feelings of yesteryear when the game couldn't be more niche and hidden from the general sporting public and media. If only all 3 types of fans united and supported what we have today in its current form (which is better than anything we've ever had), we would actually have a much stronger league and would probably be in a much better position to introduce such things as promotion and relegation as well as scrapping the cap. Unfortunately there is too much infighting which is a real shame.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Im an hopnig for 20 professional teams in the near future (in any form). Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye"
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. You mean the people that already dont watch?
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. You mean the people that already dont watch? Plenty of people that watch today that didn't watch 15 years ago so I would say we are actually on the right path and more fans will start following but it takes time. Unfortunately half the battle is within as the bitters are more relentless about bagging the current setup than Eddie McGuire. All the bitters are still waiting and hoping that the A-league collapses so they can state "I told you so" and then back we are at square one.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. You mean the people that already dont watch? Plenty of people that watch today that didn't watch 15 years ago so I would say we are actually on the right path and more fans will start following but it takes time. Unfortunately half the battle is within as the bitters are more relentless about bagging the current setup than Eddie McGuire. All the bitters are still waiting and hoping that the A-league collapses so they can state "I told you so" and then back we are at square one. If we had teams like SMFC, there will be even more people watching and TV money will increase! You can't keep Australia's biggest club out forever.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. You mean the people that already dont watch? Plenty of people that watch today that didn't watch 15 years ago so I would say we are actually on the right path and more fans will start following but it takes time. Unfortunately half the battle is within as the bitters are more relentless about bagging the current setup than Eddie McGuire. All the bitters are still waiting and hoping that the A-league collapses so they can state "I told you so" and then back we are at square one. If we had teams like SMFC, there will be even more people watching and TV money will increase! You can't keep Australia's biggest club out forever. Tbh i'm not against the introduction of Sth Melbourne. They have done plenty in recent years to make a real case. And as opposed to a decade ago they are really starting to change their ways in terms of treating the club like a big enterprise. I have been impressed with their efforts and would like them in the a-league.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. You mean the people that already dont watch? Plenty of people that watch today that didn't watch 15 years ago so I would say we are actually on the right path and more fans will start following but it takes time. Unfortunately half the battle is within as the bitters are more relentless about bagging the current setup than Eddie McGuire. All the bitters are still waiting and hoping that the A-league collapses so they can state "I told you so" and then back we are at square one. If we had teams like SMFC, there will be even more people watching and TV money will increase! You can't keep Australia's biggest club out forever. Tbh i'm not against the introduction of Sth Melbourne. They have done plenty in recent years to make a real case. And as opposed to a decade ago they are really starting to change their ways in terms of treating the club like a big enterprise. I have been impressed with their efforts and would like them in the a-league. Put it this way! If SMFC are not allowed to compete, then Soccer is not going to achieve its full potential. One of the worse things for the league is the fact that there are only 10 teams. You will be surprised at how well supported these older NSL teams really are. Not all of them, but there are 3, or 4 or 5 teams that have great support bases and a true pedigree. Teams like SMFC, Olympic, Knights, etc. Both Adelaide's Adelaide City and West Adelaide are not big enough and probably not well funded enough. But if they get together they too can create a nice little dynamo. It the end, it will make for an interesting HAL.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. You mean the people that already dont watch? Plenty of people that watch today that didn't watch 15 years ago so I would say we are actually on the right path and more fans will start following but it takes time. Unfortunately half the battle is within as the bitters are more relentless about bagging the current setup than Eddie McGuire. All the bitters are still waiting and hoping that the A-league collapses so they can state "I told you so" and then back we are at square one. If we had teams like SMFC, there will be even more people watching and TV money will increase! You can't keep Australia's biggest club out forever. You mean with their few hundred left over fans? lol
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. You mean the people that already dont watch? Plenty of people that watch today that didn't watch 15 years ago so I would say we are actually on the right path and more fans will start following but it takes time. Unfortunately half the battle is within as the bitters are more relentless about bagging the current setup than Eddie McGuire. All the bitters are still waiting and hoping that the A-league collapses so they can state "I told you so" and then back we are at square one. If we had teams like SMFC, there will be even more people watching and TV money will increase! You can't keep Australia's biggest club out forever. You mean with their few hundred left over fans? lol They are an NPL team at the moment. I don't think you should be talking about their number of fans. Brisbane will only have about 300 fans at every game soon as well, when they are dumped back to the NPL.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. What we will have in the future, is the big 4 HAL clubs, plus SMFC, Knights, Olympic, and Adelaide City/West Adelaide entity. CCM, Phoenix, Brisbane, Pheonix, and Perth Glory will die and be replaced with other teams as well.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. This is very approx. and just going by memory (could be f*cked checking it all out) but it's in this order. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. So please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. This is very approx. and just going by memory (could be f*cked checking it all out) but it's in this order. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. So please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. When SM come in im sure the FFA will make them play derbies at Aami , if not for capacity, for safety. (because of MV fans ). So we can say pretty much if teams play each other 3 times they will get 3 home derbies (2 +1). Already you are close to 90000. A 12 team league would mean 33 games per season. If they got 16 home games that season their average would be 5600 or 17 game 5200 FOR THE SEASON before they even play the other their other 13-14 home games. So of course they would have a better average than CCM.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. This is very approx. and just going by memory (could be f*cked checking it all out) but it's in this order. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. So please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. When SM come in im sure the FFA will make them play derbies at Aami , if not for capacity, for safety. (because of MV fans ). So we can say pretty much if teams play each other 3 times they will get 3 home derbies (2 +1). Already you are close to 90000. A 12 team league would mean 33 games per season. If they got 16 home games that season their average would be 5600 or 17 game 5200 FOR THE SEASON before they even play the other their other 13-14 home games. So of course they would have a better average than CCM. Contrary to your previous comments, it's good that you removed any NSL comparison in these figures because otherwise it would have been laughable. So OK you now confess the NSL bit you wrote about was BS and you want to compare what Hellas is gonna do. Well I'll tell you what it's going to do and that is be the thin end of the wedge for the influx of mono ethnic clubs with baggage who will claim they have just as might right. When that happens and the ethnic violence starts (because it will as sure as day follows night), foreign flags and chants are heard on national TV it will create the cancer the NSL once was for the growth of football. Heck, you could achieve those figures you mention in Melb by adding any other new entity, one that will encourage all comers and not just a single community. This way fans and the public won't get turned off as they would with the resurrected Hellas baggage.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. This is very approx. and just going by memory (could be f*cked checking it all out) but it's in this order. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. So please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. When SM come in im sure the FFA will make them play derbies at Aami , if not for capacity, for safety. (because of MV fans ). So we can say pretty much if teams play each other 3 times they will get 3 home derbies (2 +1). Already you are close to 90000. A 12 team league would mean 33 games per season. If they got 16 home games that season their average would be 5600 or 17 game 5200 FOR THE SEASON before they even play the other their other 13-14 home games. So of course they would have a better average than CCM. Contrary to your previous comments, it's good that you removed any NSL comparison in these figures because otherwise it would have been laughable. So OK you now confess the NSL bit you wrote about was BS and you want to compare what Hellas is gonna do. Well I'll tell you what it's going to do and that is be the thin end of the wedge for the influx of mono ethnic clubs with baggage who will claim they have just as might right. When that happens and the ethnic violence starts (because it will as sure as day follows night), foreign flags and chants are heard on national TV it will create the cancer the NSL once was for the growth of football. Heck, you could achieve those figures you mention in Melb by adding any other new entity, one that will encourage all comers and not just a single community. This way fans and the public won't get turned off as they would with the resurrected Hellas baggage. I disagree. Those people support City now. If you enter Melbourne Vanillas they will not sell out derbies, have little rivalry with PG or even AU and be an even worse effort than Heart.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. This is very approx. and just going by memory (could be f*cked checking it all out) but it's in this order. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. So please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. When SM come in im sure the FFA will make them play derbies at Aami , if not for capacity, for safety. (because of MV fans ). So we can say pretty much if teams play each other 3 times they will get 3 home derbies (2 +1). Already you are close to 90000. A 12 team league would mean 33 games per season. If they got 16 home games that season their average would be 5600 or 17 game 5200 FOR THE SEASON before they even play the other their other 13-14 home games. So of course they would have a better average than CCM. And they would average more than that. They would be in the order of between 9 to 11k.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. This is very approx. and just going by memory (could be f*cked checking it all out) but it's in this order. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. So please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. No not true. SMFC average around 10,000 and the big finals in the old NSL would get crowds of 30 to 40k. You can't be selective with your statistics. The highest attendance was 45K http://www.ozfootball.net/ark/NSL/NSL.shtmlIf SMFC got 17,000 for a Final, it's because that is what was their capacity at the time. One thing is for sure, there were NSL teams with far greater attendances than Brisbane, and SMFC was one of them. Perth Glory use to average 13K but under the HAL they only average 7K.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. This is very approx. and just going by memory (could be f*cked checking it all out) but it's in this order. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. So please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. No not true. SMFC average around 10,000 and the big finals in the old NSL would get crowds of 30 to 40k. You can't be selective with your statistics. The highest attendance was 45K http://www.ozfootball.net/ark/NSL/NSL.shtmlIf SMFC got 17,000 for a Final, it's because that is what was their capacity at the time. One thing is for sure, there were NSL teams with far greater attendances than Brisbane, and SMFC was one of them. Perth Glory use to average 13K but under the HAL they only average 7K. Fuck you are seriously talking out of your arse. I work on facts. Thankfully they don't lie and the truth can be told. South Melbourne as you just stated averaged 10k. Brisbane has only ever once in the 11 years averaged below that and it's second lowest average year was 11.5k. The avg overall attendance for Brisbane in the 11 years is 14,316.So no Sth Melbourne was never a bigger team than Brisbane. And Perth Glory, no they have never averaged 7k in any year, their average over the 11 years is actually 9,155 which admittedly isn't great however they haven't really been very successful other than making the gf once in their 11 year history in the a-league. Compared to them dominating back in the NSL days it's no surprise. But let's not cherry pick one side or another otherwise it will get embarrassing if we start adding Victory, WSW and Sydney FC to the mix. Fact of the matter is that in the 30 odd years of the NSL, attendances never really jumped much higher than 4-5k average per season. In only one season in the A-league has the average ever dipped below 10k and that was during the horror of Fury and Gold Coast. http://www.ultimatealeague.com/records.php?type=att&season=2013-14
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. This is very approx. and just going by memory (could be f*cked checking it all out) but it's in this order. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. So please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. No not true. SMFC average around 10,000 and the big finals in the old NSL would get crowds of 30 to 40k. You can't be selective with your statistics. The highest attendance was 45K http://www.ozfootball.net/ark/NSL/NSL.shtmlIf SMFC got 17,000 for a Final, it's because that is what was their capacity at the time. One thing is for sure, there were NSL teams with far greater attendances than Brisbane, and SMFC was one of them. Perth Glory use to average 13K but under the HAL they only average 7K. Fuck you are seriously talking out of your arse. I work on facts. Thankfully they don't lie and the truth can be told. South Melbourne as you just stated averaged 10k. Brisbane has only ever once in the 11 years averaged below that and it's second lowest average year was 11.5k. The avg overall attendance for Brisbane in the 11 years is 14,316.So no Sth Melbourne was never a bigger team than Brisbane. And Perth Glory, no they have never averaged 7k in any year, their average over the 11 years is actually 9,155 which admittedly isn't great however they haven't really been very successful other than making the gf once in their 11 year history in the a-league. Compared to them dominating back in the NSL days it's no surprise. But let's not cherry pick one side or another otherwise it will get embarrassing if we start adding Victory, WSW and Sydney FC to the mix. Fact of the matter is that in the 30 odd years of the NSL, attendances never really jumped much higher than 4-5k average per season. In only one season in the A-league has the average ever dipped below 10k and that was during the horror of Fury and Gold Coast. http://www.ultimatealeague.com/records.php?type=att&season=2013-14 I never said they were a bigger team. The are however a bigger club, with a better history, and since we generally agree on the figures, then SMFC is surely adequate enough to participate in the HAL. If my estimates are correct and SMFC can achieve crowds of around 10K, which is only 1.5K behind Brisbane, then SMFC should be in the competition because there are many teams which achieve a far lower average.
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]All we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. Please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. wrong again. 1989 Marconi Stallions v. Sydney Olympic, Parramatta Stadium,Attendance 23,387 1989–90 Sydney Olympic v. Marconi Stallions, ParramattaStadium, Attendance 26,353 1990–91 South Melbourne v. Melbourne Knights, Olympic Park, Attendance 21,338 Official capacity Olympic park: 18,500 ( 11,000 seats)
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]All we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. Please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. wrong again. 1989 Marconi Stallions v. Sydney Olympic, Parramatta Stadium,Attendance 23,387 1989–90 Sydney Olympic v. Marconi Stallions, ParramattaStadium, Attendance 26,353 1990–91 South Melbourne v. Melbourne Knights, Olympic Park, Attendance 21,338 Official capacity Olympic park: 18,500 ( 11,000 seats)
You've made me check and there those few higher that 17,000 agree. South Melb Hellas couldn't muster more than 16,000 in their other two home finals in the 90's (not a good sign for those advocating Hellas will bump the crowds). Attendances involving broad based NSL teams in a home final was around 40,000. I recall Brisbane Strikers having to shut the gates early. But you've made no mention of the NSL best average vs HAL's best average? Figures any good? How did I go? Brisbane Roar could have had at least 50% more in a Suncorp finals match except for its little capacity of 52,000. MVFC once could have filled the MCG in a final going buy the demand, reports and chatters. How does that all compare to the NSL?
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]All we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. The best the NSL averaged was around 5,000 / game or about 1/3 of HAL's best year. When 2 mono ethnic teams played in a final you would never get capacity crowd. Even with Hellas 17,000 biggest attendance. HAL capacity 40,000 to 50,000 constantly. NSL even had crowds as low as a few hundred. Not even CCM in the HAL could scoop that low. Please don't continue with your deluded BS of NSL grandeur because its all figment of your imagination. wrong again. 1989 Marconi Stallions v. Sydney Olympic, Parramatta Stadium,Attendance 23,387 1989–90 Sydney Olympic v. Marconi Stallions, ParramattaStadium, Attendance 26,353 1990–91 South Melbourne v. Melbourne Knights, Olympic Park, Attendance 21,338 Official capacity Olympic park: 18,500 ( 11,000 seats)
You've made me check and there those few higher that 17,000 agree. South Melb Hellas couldn't muster more than 16,000 in their other two home finals in the 90's (not a good sign for those advocating Hellas will bump the crowds). Attendances involving broad based NSL teams in a home final was around 40,000. I recall Brisbane Strikers having to shut the gates early. But you've made no mention of the NSL best average vs HAL's best average? Figures any good? How did I go? Brisbane Roar could have had at least 50% more in a Suncorp finals match except for its little capacity of 52,000. MVFC once could have filled the MCG in a final going buy the demand, reports and chatters. How does that all compare to the NSL? Usually checking the facts before using them to make a point is a good idea, otherwise you may look stoopid. Some more interesting stats for you: Largest NSL final, Perth v Wollongong, 43K in 2000. Largest ever football attendance in Australia was Olympic final in 2000 with 104,098. Smallest HAL: NQ Fury v. Roar 1,003 in 2011. Sokkah existed before the HAL and the unfortunate truth for you is that without the NSL and the effniks there would never have been a HAL.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. Oh come on!! Where should I start. How about some facts hey. Back in 2002 the NSL had average attendance of 4,381 ( http://www.austadiums.com/news/news.php?id=8) which was only 15% lower than the previous season. Finding attendance records for the NSL is very difficult because it simply didn't really make news back then, however I managed to compile some stats regarding grand final attendances from 1984 onwards. Of the 23 matches played (3 years of which were home and away gf fixtures), in only 10 occasions out of the 23 did a grand final manage to rake in more than 15,000. And if we can safely assume that any grand final is usually 3 times or sometimes more than the average for in season games, you can safely say that average crowds for the NSL historically sit around the 4 - 5k mark. So no, the NSL was never ever anywhere near what the a-league is.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. Oh come on!! Where should I start. How about some facts hey. Back in 2002 the NSL had average attendance of 4,381 ( http://www.austadiums.com/news/news.php?id=8) which was only 15% lower than the previous season. Finding attendance records for the NSL is very difficult because it simply didn't really make news back then, however I managed to compile some stats regarding grand final attendances from 1984 onwards. Of the 23 matches played (3 years of which were home and away gf fixtures), in only 10 occasions out of the 23 did a grand final manage to rake in more than 15,000. And if we can safely assume that any grand final is usually 3 times or sometimes more than the average for in season games, you can safely say that average crowds for the NSL historically sit around the 4 - 5k mark. So no, the NSL was never ever anywhere near what the a-league is. Why not? Why do they need 20k every week? They have their own stadium. It's appropriately sized. They have a base set of supporters. They have history and trophies both domestically and internationally. They have produced socceroos. They add another team. Another set of viewers. Seems stupid to exclude on the basis of attendance alone.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. Oh come on!! Where should I start. How about some facts hey. Back in 2002 the NSL had average attendance of 4,381 ( http://www.austadiums.com/news/news.php?id=8) which was only 15% lower than the previous season. Finding attendance records for the NSL is very difficult because it simply didn't really make news back then, however I managed to compile some stats regarding grand final attendances from 1984 onwards. Of the 23 matches played (3 years of which were home and away gf fixtures), in only 10 occasions out of the 23 did a grand final manage to rake in more than 15,000. And if we can safely assume that any grand final is usually 3 times or sometimes more than the average for in season games, you can safely say that average crowds for the NSL historically sit around the 4 - 5k mark. So no, the NSL was never ever anywhere near what the a-league is. Why not? Why do they need 20k every week? They have their own stadium. It's appropriately sized. They have a base set of supporters. They have history and trophies both domestically and internationally. They have produced socceroos. They add another team. Another set of viewers. Seems stupid to exclude on the basis of attendance alone. If you go back you will see that my comments towards Sth Melb are actually in support of a future aleague team. The reasons I gave were that they have really stepped up in the off field department. I still think they have some way to go with getting rid of that purely greek club image but overall they are doing well and should certainly be considered as the third or 4th melbourne team in the future. However the argument here is about whether Sth Melb was ever bigger than Brisbane which it isn't and never was. It was an argument that Aikme was trying to make.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. Oh come on!! Where should I start. How about some facts hey. Back in 2002 the NSL had average attendance of 4,381 ( http://www.austadiums.com/news/news.php?id=8) which was only 15% lower than the previous season. Finding attendance records for the NSL is very difficult because it simply didn't really make news back then, however I managed to compile some stats regarding grand final attendances from 1984 onwards. Of the 23 matches played (3 years of which were home and away gf fixtures), in only 10 occasions out of the 23 did a grand final manage to rake in more than 15,000. And if we can safely assume that any grand final is usually 3 times or sometimes more than the average for in season games, you can safely say that average crowds for the NSL historically sit around the 4 - 5k mark. So no, the NSL was never ever anywhere near what the a-league is. Why not? Why do they need 20k every week? They have their own stadium. It's appropriately sized. They have a base set of supporters. They have history and trophies both domestically and internationally. They have produced socceroos. They add another team. Another set of viewers. Seems stupid to exclude on the basis of attendance alone. If you go back you will see that my comments towards Sth Melb are actually in support of a future aleague team. The reasons I gave were that they have really stepped up in the off field department. I still think they have some way to go with getting rid of that purely greek club image but overall they are doing well and should certainly be considered as the third or 4th melbourne team in the future. However the argument here is about whether Sth Melb was ever bigger than Brisbane which it isn't and never was. It was an argument that Aikme was trying to make. Well that is great that you have that attitude. You will find that there are many who will not support the entry of SMFC at all. Now, that is like Greece having a ban on Olympiakos or Panathinaikos. It's not right, and it is holding Football back. Bare in mind, I am not delusional to actually think the HAL is a runaway success. let's be honest here. It isn't a big success at all. There are some hugely successful teams in the HAL, like WSW and MVFC which is massive, but lets look beyond them and AUFC, Sudney United, Newcastle, and Maybe Brisbane (although they are on the brink). Then we have Phoenix, CCM, Perth Glory. Speaking of Perth Glory, did you know that during the NSL, they had double the average they enjoy now under the HAL. Why is that? Obviously there is something wrong there.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. Oh come on!! Where should I start. How about some facts hey. Back in 2002 the NSL had average attendance of 4,381 ( http://www.austadiums.com/news/news.php?id=8) which was only 15% lower than the previous season. Finding attendance records for the NSL is very difficult because it simply didn't really make news back then, however I managed to compile some stats regarding grand final attendances from 1984 onwards. Of the 23 matches played (3 years of which were home and away gf fixtures), in only 10 occasions out of the 23 did a grand final manage to rake in more than 15,000. And if we can safely assume that any grand final is usually 3 times or sometimes more than the average for in season games, you can safely say that average crowds for the NSL historically sit around the 4 - 5k mark. So no, the NSL was never ever anywhere near what the a-league is. Why not? Why do they need 20k every week? They have their own stadium. It's appropriately sized. They have a base set of supporters. They have history and trophies both domestically and internationally. They have produced socceroos. They add another team. Another set of viewers. Seems stupid to exclude on the basis of attendance alone. If you go back you will see that my comments towards Sth Melb are actually in support of a future aleague team. The reasons I gave were that they have really stepped up in the off field department. I still think they have some way to go with getting rid of that purely greek club image but overall they are doing well and should certainly be considered as the third or 4th melbourne team in the future. However the argument here is about whether Sth Melb was ever bigger than Brisbane which it isn't and never was. It was an argument that Aikme was trying to make. Well that is great that you have that attitude. You will find that there are many who will not support the entry of SMFC at all. Now, that is like Greece having a ban on Olympiakos or Panathinaikos. It's not right, and it is holding Football back. Bare in mind, I am not delusional to actually think the HAL is a runaway success. let's be honest here. It isn't a big success at all. There are some hugely successful teams in the HAL, like WSW and MVFC which is massive, but lets look beyond them and AUFC, Sudney United, Newcastle, and Maybe Brisbane (although they are on the brink). Then we have Phoenix, CCM, Perth Glory. Speaking of Perth Glory, did you know that during the NSL, they had double the average they enjoy now under the HAL. Why is that? Obviously there is something wrong there. As I have already mentioned Perth Glory didn't have double the average. Perth GLory were averaging 12k in the NSL with huge onfield success and Glory of today with no success are averaging around 9.5k so they definitely never averaged double (long term wise). And I think this year we'll see them average around the 12-13k mark. The club is growing over there now.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. Oh come on!! Where should I start. How about some facts hey. Back in 2002 the NSL had average attendance of 4,381 ( http://www.austadiums.com/news/news.php?id=8) which was only 15% lower than the previous season. Finding attendance records for the NSL is very difficult because it simply didn't really make news back then, however I managed to compile some stats regarding grand final attendances from 1984 onwards. Of the 23 matches played (3 years of which were home and away gf fixtures), in only 10 occasions out of the 23 did a grand final manage to rake in more than 15,000. And if we can safely assume that any grand final is usually 3 times or sometimes more than the average for in season games, you can safely say that average crowds for the NSL historically sit around the 4 - 5k mark. So no, the NSL was never ever anywhere near what the a-league is. Why not? Why do they need 20k every week? They have their own stadium. It's appropriately sized. They have a base set of supporters. They have history and trophies both domestically and internationally. They have produced socceroos. They add another team. Another set of viewers. Seems stupid to exclude on the basis of attendance alone. If you go back you will see that my comments towards Sth Melb are actually in support of a future aleague team. The reasons I gave were that they have really stepped up in the off field department. I still think they have some way to go with getting rid of that purely greek club image but overall they are doing well and should certainly be considered as the third or 4th melbourne team in the future. However the argument here is about whether Sth Melb was ever bigger than Brisbane which it isn't and never was. It was an argument that Aikme was trying to make. Sorry mate got confused amongst all the crap. Trophy wise it could be argued though....
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. Oh come on!! Where should I start. How about some facts hey. Back in 2002 the NSL had average attendance of 4,381 ( http://www.austadiums.com/news/news.php?id=8) which was only 15% lower than the previous season. Finding attendance records for the NSL is very difficult because it simply didn't really make news back then, however I managed to compile some stats regarding grand final attendances from 1984 onwards. Of the 23 matches played (3 years of which were home and away gf fixtures), in only 10 occasions out of the 23 did a grand final manage to rake in more than 15,000. And if we can safely assume that any grand final is usually 3 times or sometimes more than the average for in season games, you can safely say that average crowds for the NSL historically sit around the 4 - 5k mark. So no, the NSL was never ever anywhere near what the a-league is. Why not? Why do they need 20k every week? They have their own stadium. It's appropriately sized. They have a base set of supporters. They have history and trophies both domestically and internationally. They have produced socceroos. They add another team. Another set of viewers. Seems stupid to exclude on the basis of attendance alone. If you go back you will see that my comments towards Sth Melb are actually in support of a future aleague team. The reasons I gave were that they have really stepped up in the off field department. I still think they have some way to go with getting rid of that purely greek club image but overall they are doing well and should certainly be considered as the third or 4th melbourne team in the future. However the argument here is about whether Sth Melb was ever bigger than Brisbane which it isn't and never was. It was an argument that Aikme was trying to make. Sorry mate got confused amongst all the crap. Trophy wise it could be argued though.... Yeah for sure trophy wise. I'm not going to dispute on field success. End of the day Sth have been around for longer. In saying that, with all the drama Brisbane Roar have endured they have been extremely successful. 3 titles in 11 years is a great return in a salary capped league.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. Spot on. Was just about to bold that last paragraph myself and infact it confirms my point even further about people here wanting to keep our game a little kids game that will never be taken seriously. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. The argument about not bringing in new teams as big as WSW and Victory are a bit of a joke. I remember a plethora of threads prior to 2012 with people here whinging that introducing WSW would decimate Sydney fc and that we couldn;t handle 2 big clubs in a city. How wrong they were. I was and will always be in favour of having multiple clubs from within big metro cities, for reasons given many times previously. There will be room for regional teams but imo not until either a second league league is created or until we hit 14 or so teams in the a-league. It's not miles ahead. There were teams in the NSL getting very big crowds and they were breaking the million mark regularly. The game was talked down by the media, and then they had to bad years. That was Australia's racism shining through just like it shines through to this day. The HAL is dieing. That is the cool harsh reality. Just one calamity and that will be curtains. Just one team going bankrupt, and say bye bye to the TV Deal. We have always been on the brink. The two teams doing well in the NSL are now in the a-league. Perth Glory and Adelaide United of which United. I've looked at the stats for attendances for NSL games and many games were getting less than 3-4k in some instances less than 2k. Yes very successful.... Hahaha i laugh about your statement on A-league dieing. It must be hard for you as you've probably been on the same mantra since 2006 I imagine. See the reason why I know that there is no better solution is because all other clubs outside of the a-league are in no place to really get there shit in order with perhaps the exception of Sth Melbourne. No club has been able to really knock on the FFA's doors and convincingly make a case for being included. And you know why? Because all these clubs lack the fundamental ability to raise proper capital. They have no real backing. NONE! They run like a school tuck shop. They can barely scrape a few million together. So that's how I know there isn't a better solution at present despite a few clubs in the a-league having troubles of their own. I'm sure your tune will change though if in the event one of your beloved NSL teams makes it in the a-league right? Come back to me when you can prove that a dozen clubs outside of the A-league have $30m + in hard capital to invest in their club. Of course you will find bad statistics when you search for them. There are bad statistics in the HAL. I am talking about overall. For instance, Perth Glory had double the attendance back in the NSL than it does now in the HAL. So it has gone backwards ass many more will do soon. SMFC had good crowds as did a few other teams like Heart or whatever they were and some other new constructs. The NSL was achieving over 1 million through the gate, and the A League isn't doing much more than that either. Oh come on!! Where should I start. How about some facts hey. Back in 2002 the NSL had average attendance of 4,381 ( http://www.austadiums.com/news/news.php?id=8) which was only 15% lower than the previous season. Finding attendance records for the NSL is very difficult because it simply didn't really make news back then, however I managed to compile some stats regarding grand final attendances from 1984 onwards. Of the 23 matches played (3 years of which were home and away gf fixtures), in only 10 occasions out of the 23 did a grand final manage to rake in more than 15,000. And if we can safely assume that any grand final is usually 3 times or sometimes more than the average for in season games, you can safely say that average crowds for the NSL historically sit around the 4 - 5k mark. So no, the NSL was never ever anywhere near what the a-league is. People are always quoting the 2002 and 2003 seasons. These were by far the 2 worse seasons in NSL history. But if you want to be completely corect and true, you need to go a bit further when the averages were higher. During the early 2000s, the NSL experienced a lot of negative press as if the media were hell bent on destroying the game. I remember it clearly with all the reports of violence and low attendances. It's amazing I made it out of their ALIVE! Of course it was all exagerated, but we are starting to see similar reports about the HAL but nothing like it was back then. It will get worse however.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
why does your team always try to insult our team with names?
You pro FFA controlling everything guys are mean.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
The scottyboys
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Team Paulc
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
What kind of club is it when it is virtually owned by the FFA?
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
FFA starts league FFA sells franchise license FFA not happy FFA take back license FFA sell license FFA not happy
Fans here "FFA should pay the players directly"
Talk about brainwashed.
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+xFFA starts leagueFFA sells franchise licenseFFA not happyFFA take back licenseFFA sell licenseFFA not happyFans here "FFA should pay the players directly"Talk about brainwashed. And ill-informed. Its like the video easy model. Works for an abberant and insular retard sport like afl... for football... not so much.
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xFFA starts leagueFFA sells franchise licenseFFA not happyFFA take back licenseFFA sell licenseFFA not happyFans here "FFA should pay the players directly"Talk about brainwashed. And ill-informed. Its like the video easy model. Works for an abberant and insular retard sport like afl... for football... not so much. Love your signature mate. Some real Football Kulcha there! :)
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xFFA starts leagueFFA sells franchise licenseFFA not happyFFA take back licenseFFA sell licenseFFA not happyFans here "FFA should pay the players directly"Talk about brainwashed. And ill-informed. Its like the video easy model. Works for an abberant and insular retard sport like afl... for football... not so much. Love your signature mate. Some real Football Kulcha there! :) You like it because it's Greek.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xFFA starts leagueFFA sells franchise licenseFFA not happyFFA take back licenseFFA sell licenseFFA not happyFans here "FFA should pay the players directly"Talk about brainwashed. It's absolutely retarded.
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xFFA starts leagueFFA sells franchise licenseFFA not happyFFA take back licenseFFA sell licenseFFA not happyFans here "FFA should pay the players directly"Talk about brainwashed. Sounds so sustainable but I'm waiting for old mate to ark up "Something something this is better than football kulcha etc etc"
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
scott21 confirming everyone else's suspicions regarding his usage of logic in here. Good stuff.
You know when Aikhme, HortoMagiko, Rusty and mvfc are in your corner you're doing a good job with the tinfoil.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Go back to stalking in the shadows sniper. You keep comforming what a bullying big man you are. With all your education you do understand you are a narcissist right? It is quite disturbing watching your behavior trying to manipulate members against anyone who doesn't fit your world image. A manipulator who gets his kicks from discouraging others.
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+xGo back to stalking in the shadows sniper. You keep comforming what a bullying big man you are. With all your education you do understand you are a narcissist right? It is quite disturbing watching your behavior trying to manipulate members against anyone who doesn't fit your world image. A manipulator who gets his kicks from discouraging others.  Lol. Ticking all boxes. Its funny cause its true :)
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Oh Draupkik!
You upset bud? Go get a hug from the M80 circle!
|
|
|
WSF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOh Draupkik! You upset bud? Go get a hug from the M80 circle! Go do a rain dance in the weather thread in extra time, you bring 442 down with your shit posts.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xOh Draupkik! You upset bud? Go get a hug from the M80 circle! Go do a rain dance in the weather thread in extra time, you bring 442 down with your shit posts. Done my morning rain dance mate right after my usual gym workout!
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+xscott21 confirming everyone else's suspicions regarding his usage of logic in here. Good stuff. You know when Aikhme, HortoMagiko, Rusty and mvfc are in your corner you're doing a good job with the tinfoil. Aww. Haha. How cute....ljubo pathetich wants some attention. Stop stalking me weirdo.
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Anyone know if the players have gotten their wedge yet? Just measuring the Cobb bullshit to see if this admin error is one of those 2 week long ones.
|
|
|
FullBack4
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 697,
Visits: 0
|
+xAnyone know if the players have gotten their wedge yet? Just measuring the Cobb bullshit to see if this admin error is one of those 2 week long ones. Whats laughable with your BRFC fans is that you seem to be targeting Cobb, the target is surely the Bakries who cost you your last CEO and created exactly the same crisis last year. Cobb is just incidental. Maybe you're all getting what you deserve? a stupid club for stupid fans lol?? P.S. Yes, all staff were paid by Tuesday but i dont think you were interested in that, just taking a shot at Cobb, a mere employee of the club lol and not the money-man
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Payer payments were made yesterday instead of the day before. That makes the delay hours late rather than days. It's a crisis. FFA need to do something about this cash flow issue that last a few hours. It's devastating.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPayer payments were made yesterday instead of the day before. That makes the delay hours late rather than days. It's a crisis. FFA need to do something about this cash flow issue that last a few hours. It's devastating. Still though, its not good enough to have this play out every year... i feel for the players and actual real fans invested in the game like waz mr bris et al
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
FullBack4
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 697,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xPayer payments were made yesterday instead of the day before. That makes the delay hours late rather than days. It's a crisis. FFA need to do something about this cash flow issue that last a few hours. It's devastating. Still though, its not good enough to have this play out every year... i feel for the players and actual real fans invested in the game like waz mr bris et al Its not! and although staff have been paid some suppliers have not been paid, rinse and repeat, just wait for the winding up order in about 30 days.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xPayer payments were made yesterday instead of the day before. That makes the delay hours late rather than days. It's a crisis. FFA need to do something about this cash flow issue that last a few hours. It's devastating. Still though, its not good enough to have this play out every year... i feel for the players and actual real fans invested in the game like waz mr bris et al Its not! and although staff have been paid some suppliers have not been paid, rinse and repeat, just wait for the winding up order in about 30 days. Wind up orders are easy. Your company doesn't pay a $10 laundry bill and it can be would up.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xPayer payments were made yesterday instead of the day before. That makes the delay hours late rather than days. It's a crisis. FFA need to do something about this cash flow issue that last a few hours. It's devastating. Still though, its not good enough to have this play out every year... i feel for the players and actual real fans invested in the game like waz mr bris et al You only feel for yourself Hortico
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xPayer payments were made yesterday instead of the day before. That makes the delay hours late rather than days. It's a crisis. FFA need to do something about this cash flow issue that last a few hours. It's devastating. Still though, its not good enough to have this play out every year... i feel for the players and actual real fans invested in the game like waz mr bris et al You only feel for yourself Hortico Well you clearly dont seem to feel for the club that you allegedly support.. its almost like you're enjoying this....
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
And people who the game brought in since 2005 plus sponsors, advertisers, TV etc. Too complex for a bitter I know
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Mr B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 1
|
Some of you really need to grow up, go outside and get some fresh air at least.
|
|
|
lolitsbigmic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.5K,
Visits: 0
|
All this trolling for someone in the roar financial department not doing the wage transaction on Friday afternoon.
I love this place.
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
The owners of embattled A-League club Brisbane Roar face the prospect of having the club’s licence stripped off them after they were handed an ultimatum by Football Federation Australia yesterday.
In a move aimed at finally resolving months of controversy and drama that have dogged the club, FFA chief executive David Gallop issued the warning in a stern statement that followed a meeting with Roar managing director Daniel Cobb.
The meeting followed concern over the club’s late payments this month to players and staff. While Cobb, who is acting for the club’s owners the Bakrie Group, confirmed that all players and staff had been paid yesterday, Gallop clearly has had enough.
“While the payments have now been made it is clear that relations between the Bakries and Mr Cobb need to be resolved one way or the other as soon as possible,” Gallop said in a statement. “If the club is to be sold, sell it. If not, then the current owners must restore confidence in the operations by adequately resourcing the club.”
It is no secret the Bakries have been keen to sell the club for the past 18 months, but have yet to find a buyer prepared to pay the asking price.
In the meantime, the club has had to tread water, leaving coach John Aloisi handcuffed in terms of what he can do to buy players and sort out a training ground.
The situation is now expected to come to a head after Cobb issued a statement in which he appeared to shift the blame back on to the Bakries. “I have briefed the FFA and Professional Footballers Australia to assure them that player, coach and administration staff wages and superannuation are up to date,” Cobb said in a statement.
“Today’s meeting with FFA was brought about by a default from the Bakrie Group on the recapitalisation of the club.
“I agreed to come in as managing director in order to stabilise the club on the condition that a $1.1 million injection in to the club was provided on July 1, 2016.
“As of today, only $405,000 has been provided. This has a significant impact on the club moving forward and in particular our move to Ballymore (for training). Discussions are now taking place with the Bakrie Group about how this situation will be rectified.”
Sydney FC are expected to announce the signing of striker Deyvison Rogerio da Silva, otherwise known as Bobo, in the next few days.
The Brazilian underwent a medical yesterday and will replace Alex Brosque as one of the club’s two marquee players.
Bobo, 31, has a quality resume, having played in Brazil and Turkey. He made his name with leading Turkish club Besiktas, where he played 222 games and scored 97 goals between 2006 and 2011. He also had a stint with Kayserispor (67 games for 32 goals) between 2012-15. His last club was Gremio in Brazil, where he managed five goals in 20 games.
Western Sydney also appear close to signing an attacker, with DR Congo international Herve Kage being linked to the club.
The 27-year-old attacking winger, capped three times for his country, has played most of his football in Belgium.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/football/aleague-brisbane-roar-handed-ultimatum-by-ffa/news-story/4dc44226b36148ebcbea5ebcae63d230
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. You mean the people that already dont watch? Plenty of people that watch today that didn't watch 15 years ago so I would say we are actually on the right path and more fans will start following but it takes time. Unfortunately half the battle is within as the bitters are more relentless about bagging the current setup than Eddie McGuire. All the bitters are still waiting and hoping that the A-league collapses so they can state "I told you so" and then back we are at square one. What paulc writes about people isnt true. I dont think there are any "bitters" on this site. If someone questions the current model - bitter. If someone disagrees with the FFA having a marquee fund - bitter. If someone disagrees with salary cap - bitter. no pro/rel - bitter. All the things that need to be changed to improve domestic football - bitter. No I am not "bitter", I just have a different opinion of what is better. You should leave the name calling to the real bitters because you are better than that. +x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. 3000 would be an absolute disaster. Get out of the old school NSL style attendances as they were absolutely atrocious. Even now they aren't great but are miles infront of what they were prior to the A-league, hence why Franks model is working on me because it is absolutely MILES better than anything we've ever had, and all metrics will confirm that with regards to general popularity of the league. Like I wrote on here before it is like you have been in a violent relationship and are willing to accept less abuse, albeit in a different style, because it is better than before.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAll we need is to replace this EFFNIK Dutch club with Brisbane Strikers. :) They would be bankrupt before years end if Strikers got in. We need serious backing for clubs moving forward. Not corner store operations that most ex NSL clubs run on. fmd have you started to paraphrase paulc? No just speaking more sense than some on here that would be happy to have a tuck shop team in the top flight of our comp as if its the NPL.. Your elitest attitude is what is wrong with Australian football. At what point does it become about supporting Sydney FC first? Elitist attitude?? No it's about not being provincial which is the problem with so many supporters here. They are still stuck in the mentality of our game being a niche little sport that is supported by the minorities rather than the majority in this country. If we want to grow the game (at the expense of alienating a few old bitters who have never really embraced the a-league) by looking at bigger companies or consortiums to take charge of our clubs with deep pockets and real ability to grow the club then that's what we should strive for. By having clubs with minimal backing but old school sentiment such as some of the ex NSL clubs, will not get us far. What the FFA needs to do better is making sure serious people with serious funds are able to take control of our clubs. Clearly with Brisbane Roar and Gold Coast they got it wrong, however allocating licenses to clubs backed by the same type of financial strength as the CCM is just asking for trouble. Brisbane unlike CCM isn't a regional club and deserves a big backer to drive the club forward. The Brisbane Strikers would just be CCM V2.0. Im not sure why you think I want to turn the A-League into the NSL. I have said I want Strikers and SM in, but that is pretty much it. I have even said WW. You some how magically think we can pull 2-4 clubs out of thin air that will be as big as WSW or MV. Not going to happen. Franks model is working on you and you think any club coming in will automatically be as big as Sydney FC or should be. We have pretty much as many big clubs as we can squeeze out. Its time to think smaller. MV, MC SFC & WSW will always get the prime time matches so why do you care if a new club plays at a small venue? You support SFC, I dont see how this effects you. "oh my god, what will the people think if we have a team that plays at a 3000 seat stadium. I couldnt look them them in the eye" They will think sockah is a tin pot game, which may well match your vision but unsatisfactory to most. You mean the people that already dont watch? Plenty of people that watch today that didn't watch 15 years ago so I would say we are actually on the right path and more fans will start following but it takes time. Unfortunately half the battle is within as the bitters are more relentless about bagging the current setup than Eddie McGuire. All the bitters are still waiting and hoping that the A-league collapses so they can state "I told you so" and then back we are at square one. What paulc writes about people isnt true. I dont think there are any "bitters" on this site. If someone questions the current model - bitter. If someone disagrees with the FFA having a marquee fund - bitter. If someone disagrees with salary cap - bitter. no pro/rel - bitter. All the things that need to be changed to improve domestic football - bitter. No I am not "bitter", I just have a different opinion of what is better.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
World class deflection tactics here Pauly. You'd almost forget this was a thread about the joke of a club that is BR
|
|
|
scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Seriously when did this thread turn into the latest Pauly Hanson rant
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Daniel Cobb has resigned as Brisbane's Managing Director and says he will submit a final offer to buy the A-League club from their current owners, the Indonesian-based Bakrie Group. Cobb stated he had paid the club's bills out of his own pocket after claims that staff and players hadn't been paid were made public. Cobb stated he had paid the club's bills out of his own pocket after claims that staff and players hadn't been paid were made public. Cobb also stated that the Bakrie Group had failed to deliver on a promise to inject $1.1 million into the club, something promised to him when he agreed to take on the role of Managing Director with the club. Cobb also stated that the Bakrie Group had failed to deliver on a promise to inject $1.1 million into the club, something promised to him when he agreed to take on the role of Managing Director with the club.
http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2016/08/17/crisis-continues-cobb-quits-roar-boss-0
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xDaniel Cobb has resigned as Brisbane's Managing Director and says he will submit a final offer to buy the A-League club from their current owners, the Indonesian-based Bakrie Group. Cobb stated he had paid the club's bills out of his own pocket after claims that staff and players hadn't been paid were made public. Cobb stated he had paid the club's bills out of his own pocket after claims that staff and players hadn't been paid were made public. Cobb also stated that the Bakrie Group had failed to deliver on a promise to inject $1.1 million into the club, something promised to him when he agreed to take on the role of Managing Director with the club. Cobb also stated that the Bakrie Group had failed to deliver on a promise to inject $1.1 million into the club, something promised to him when he agreed to take on the role of Managing Director with the club.
http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2016/08/17/crisis-continues-cobb-quits-roar-boss-0
I have called SMFC to see if they will come to the rescue. ;)
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xDaniel Cobb has resigned as Brisbane's Managing Director and says he will submit a final offer to buy the A-League club from their current owners, the Indonesian-based Bakrie Group. Cobb stated he had paid the club's bills out of his own pocket after claims that staff and players hadn't been paid were made public. Cobb stated he had paid the club's bills out of his own pocket after claims that staff and players hadn't been paid were made public. Cobb also stated that the Bakrie Group had failed to deliver on a promise to inject $1.1 million into the club, something promised to him when he agreed to take on the role of Managing Director with the club. Cobb also stated that the Bakrie Group had failed to deliver on a promise to inject $1.1 million into the club, something promised to him when he agreed to take on the role of Managing Director with the club.
http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2016/08/17/crisis-continues-cobb-quits-roar-boss-0
May want to buy a club that may be insolvent and owes him money. Strange coincidence.
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Ever since day 1 I haven't trusted Cobb. Best case scenario I see is him fucking off, Bakries defaulting and the FFA taking Roar over, This has to stop.
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Wtf is going on The events could have an immediate impact on coach John Aloisi’s plans for the new season, as it’s understood German import Jerome Polenz won’t receive the first part of his severance package, which was due on Wednesday. Polenz had agreed to mutually terminate his contract with Brisbane and the club made an official announcement on Monday that he was leaving. Cobb said it was disgusting that the Bakries had failed to provide the money for Polenz’s payout. Asked if the Roar had been trading while insolvent, Cobb said: “I’m not prepared to answer that question.” AAP understands Cobb was already likely to be sacked by the Bakries, who had grown suspicious of him after his falling out with Aloisi and football director Craig Moore.
http://sportsbusinessinsider.com.au/news/cobb-quits-brisbane-roars-crisis-widens/
|
|
|
Gazzza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWtf is going on The events could have an immediate impact on coach John Aloisi’s plans for the new season, as it’s understood German import Jerome Polenz won’t receive the first part of his severance package, which was due on Wednesday. Polenz had agreed to mutually terminate his contract with Brisbane and the club made an official announcement on Monday that he was leaving. Cobb said it was disgusting that the Bakries had failed to provide the money for Polenz’s payout. Asked if the Roar had been trading while insolvent, Cobb said: “I’m not prepared to answer that question.” AAP understands Cobb was already likely to be sacked by the Bakries, who had grown suspicious of him after his falling out with Aloisi and football director Craig Moore.
http://sportsbusinessinsider.com.au/news/cobb-quits-brisbane-roars-crisis-widens/
LOL Cobb laying in to the Bakries, and wants to make a final offer, the guy is a nutjob.
|
|
|
Gazzza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
The more I hear from the Cobb the more dodgy he sounds by sounding like he is not the blame etc etc. Should never have been hired and the only the one to blame for that is the Bakries. So he is blaming them and then going to make one last offer? LOL Yea that will work, as if he used his own cash as well what a laugh. FFA were angry before so what will they be now, super angry?
|
|
|
Mr B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 1
|
FMD, it just never ends. What a joke.
|
|
|
Gayfish
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xFMD, it just never ends. What a joke of a club, Time to support Melbourne Victory.
|
|
|
Mr B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+xFMD, it just never ends. What a joke of a club, Time to support Melbourne Victory. :crying: Not far from it, they know how to run a club at least.
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
Just heard a rumor that a well know Melbourne based club has put in an offer of 6 cevaps, 3 cabbage rolls and a slab of Karlovacka to the Bakries as well. paulc is frantically trying to organize a counter offer of 20 pairs of clogs and a bunch of tulips,
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Brisbane Roar The gift that keeps on giving
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
3 years tops
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
What a pathetic joke of a club. What as pathetic joke of a state. Cant even get behind 1 out of once 3 potential A-League teams. Joke of a state.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Payment problems hurt the A-League not just players and staffIt’s pleasing that the club has caught up with all of their accounts with current players and staff. Indeed, this should always be the situation. It must be the norm. Unfortunately, it’s not. By Sebastian Hassett 17 AUG 2016 - 8:46 PM UPDATED YESTERDAY 8:49 PM
Crisis continues as Cobb quits as Roar boss Daniel Cobb has quit as Brisbane's managing director as a result of ongoing tensions with the club's current owners. The press release from Brisbane Roar on Tuesday afternoon was short - and straight to the point.
“All A-League players, coaches and administration staff of the club have been paid,” read the first line. “In addition, superannuation payments for all players, coaches and administration staff are up to date.”
It’s pleasing that the club has caught up with all of their accounts with current players and staff. Indeed, this should always be the situation. It must be the norm.
Unfortunately, it’s not. Roughly half of the A-League clubs have had trouble paying their players (in some capacity) over the past decade. It’s not a problem unique to the Roar by any means.
The question needs to be put more pointedly to Football Federation Australia - why are teams being allowed to get away with this?
You don’t hear about it in the AFL. You don’t hear about it in the NRL (unless Nathan Tinkler is involved). It is just a total non-story. So why should the A-League be any different?
I have no doubt the situation has improved at most clubs as the message appears to have sunk in with owners. If you own the club, and can enjoy the glory and status of that, you have to pay up in a timely fashion.
Late payments - and dishonoured payments - are also a slap in the face to the other owners in the league because an owner who doesn’t pay the bills sullies the entire competition. Not to mention the huge damage you do to your own personal (and business) brand.
The A-League has a hard enough time attracting top class players to these shores without the concern of whether playing here will see you left with unpaid wages. German midfielder Peter Perchtold and Brazilian Robson struck that exact situation during their ill-fated stint at Gold Coast United. It’s not just players, too. Sacked Central Coast coach Phil Moss took several months to secure his severance package from the Mariners. Branko Culina took even longer to get anything out of Newcastle. Adelaide had a terrible time extricating themselves from Dutchman Rini Coolen, but the most concerning now is the situation surrounding Mike Mulvey. Sacked just months after signing a three-year deal, the club have so far refused to pay him the money he is owed. It's a really bad look - not to mention grossly unfair. Nobody likes to part with money, but if there’s a contract, signed in good faith, it needs to be honoured. Speaking as somebody who has covered this game since the turn of the century, I find it greatly disheartening how money issues continue to crop up in our game. How naive we were to think it would end with the National Soccer League. The sad truth is that every time problems do arise, they distract the media from covering other, more positive aspects of the game. It’s a pretty well-worn narrative - which some outlets keenly pounce on - and tends to reinforce the sport’s status as a second class citizen. When Professional Footballers Australia struck their Collective Bargaining Agreement in 2012, it promised to ensure the players’ wages, in the salary cap, were covered in full. Theoretically, that should have ended the late payment of wages once and for all. But it didn’t. Disappointingly, some clubs still failed their obligations. Thankfully, most of the A-League owners do the right thing, and continue to spend and spend (often without much gratitude), despite the red ink that spills over most balance sheets. But the rebels need reigning in. A late payment or two may be understandable, but anything more is unacceptable. Having successfully re-packaged the Newcastle Jets and sold them to an ambitious new owner, hopefully the FFA won’t be scared to flex their muscles in the future and find the investors the game needs. It's the least the football community deserves. http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/blog/2016/08/17/payment-problems-hurt-league-not-just-players-and-staff
-PB

|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPayment problems hurt the A-League not just players and staffIt’s pleasing that the club has caught up with all of their accounts with current players and staff. Indeed, this should always be the situation. It must be the norm. Unfortunately, it’s not. By Sebastian Hassett 17 AUG 2016 - 8:46 PM UPDATED YESTERDAY 8:49 PM
Crisis continues as Cobb quits as Roar boss Daniel Cobb has quit as Brisbane's managing director as a result of ongoing tensions with the club's current owners. The press release from Brisbane Roar on Tuesday afternoon was short - and straight to the point.
“All A-League players, coaches and administration staff of the club have been paid,” read the first line. “In addition, superannuation payments for all players, coaches and administration staff are up to date.”
It’s pleasing that the club has caught up with all of their accounts with current players and staff. Indeed, this should always be the situation. It must be the norm.
Unfortunately, it’s not. Roughly half of the A-League clubs have had trouble paying their players (in some capacity) over the past decade. It’s not a problem unique to the Roar by any means.
The question needs to be put more pointedly to Football Federation Australia - why are teams being allowed to get away with this?
You don’t hear about it in the AFL. You don’t hear about it in the NRL (unless Nathan Tinkler is involved). It is just a total non-story. So why should the A-League be any different?
I have no doubt the situation has improved at most clubs as the message appears to have sunk in with owners. If you own the club, and can enjoy the glory and status of that, you have to pay up in a timely fashion.
Late payments - and dishonoured payments - are also a slap in the face to the other owners in the league because an owner who doesn’t pay the bills sullies the entire competition. Not to mention the huge damage you do to your own personal (and business) brand.
The A-League has a hard enough time attracting top class players to these shores without the concern of whether playing here will see you left with unpaid wages. German midfielder Peter Perchtold and Brazilian Robson struck that exact situation during their ill-fated stint at Gold Coast United. It’s not just players, too. Sacked Central Coast coach Phil Moss took several months to secure his severance package from the Mariners. Branko Culina took even longer to get anything out of Newcastle. Adelaide had a terrible time extricating themselves from Dutchman Rini Coolen, but the most concerning now is the situation surrounding Mike Mulvey. Sacked just months after signing a three-year deal, the club have so far refused to pay him the money he is owed. It's a really bad look - not to mention grossly unfair. Nobody likes to part with money, but if there’s a contract, signed in good faith, it needs to be honoured. Speaking as somebody who has covered this game since the turn of the century, I find it greatly disheartening how money issues continue to crop up in our game. How naive we were to think it would end with the National Soccer League. The sad truth is that every time problems do arise, they distract the media from covering other, more positive aspects of the game. It’s a pretty well-worn narrative - which some outlets keenly pounce on - and tends to reinforce the sport’s status as a second class citizen. When Professional Footballers Australia struck their Collective Bargaining Agreement in 2012, it promised to ensure the players’ wages, in the salary cap, were covered in full. Theoretically, that should have ended the late payment of wages once and for all. But it didn’t. Disappointingly, some clubs still failed their obligations. Thankfully, most of the A-League owners do the right thing, and continue to spend and spend (often without much gratitude), despite the red ink that spills over most balance sheets. But the rebels need reigning in. A late payment or two may be understandable, but anything more is unacceptable. Having successfully re-packaged the Newcastle Jets and sold them to an ambitious new owner, hopefully the FFA won’t be scared to flex their muscles in the future and find the investors the game needs. It's the least the football community deserves. http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/blog/2016/08/17/payment-problems-hurt-league-not-just-players-and-staff
-PB
Are we seriously asking how does this happen? Here's how it fucking happens. They are out of season, they are not playing games, they choose not to sell any memberships until last week (!!!), then have no cashflows to pay their staff out of. And Cobb, the MD, who thinks it is a top idea not to sell memberships, suddenly is the white knight paying the staff with his own money? Bull shit! What a scam. Sticks out like dog's balls what is happening at that club.
|
|
|
scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
QLD is where sport goes to die
|
|
|
Amaru
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 223,
Visits: 0
|
What a shitstain on the league this news is....AGAIN. Brisbane Roar is supposed to be one of the powerhouses of the league, 5 trophies, and evey year we see the same news about them. Players not paid. "Let's blame the owners.". No, let's not blame the owners. Let's blame the club and let's blame the city of Brisbane itself. It's about time this club became sustainable instead of having to rely on an owner like an unborn baby relies on his/her mother to be.
A while back I posted my opinion on why this club is always in crisis, and I put it down to the hicksville mentality of Brisbane the city. And some of you thought I was trolling and had a crack at me. Well fuck you, what I said was on point. Brisbane just doesn't do socca. What do you have to say for yourselves now you fuckwitts? The city of Brisbane is bringing the whole league down. I can understand Newcastle being in this position, but Brisbane? A city of 2M plus people, with pretty much only the Broncos to compete with, with 5 trophies in its cabinet, and the Roar can't pay its players.
Get fucken.
Kick them out the league FFS.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhat a shitstain on the league this news is....AGAIN. Brisbane Roar is supposed to be one of the powerhouses of the league, 5 trophies, and evey year we see the same news about them. Players not paid. "Let's blame the owners.". No, let's not blame the owners. Let's blame the club and let's blame the city of Brisbane itself. It's about time this club became sustainable instead of having to rely on an owner like an unborn baby relies on his/her mother to be. A while back I posted my opinion on why this club is always in crisis, and I put it down to the hicksville mentality of Brisbane the city. And some of you thought I was trolling and had a crack at me. Well fuck you, what I said was on point. Brisbane just doesn't do socca. What do you have to say for yourselves now you fuckwitts? The city of Brisbane is bringing the whole league down. I can understand Newcastle being in this position, but Brisbane? A city of 2M plus people, with pretty much only the Broncos to compete with, with 5 trophies in its cabinet, and the Roar can't pay its players. Get fucken.Kick them out the league FFS. Brisbane should have 2 or so teams playing out of small venues. The Broncos are one of the most, if no the most supported club in any sport in Australia. I dont think we should compare any club to them.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhat a shitstain on the league this news is....AGAIN. Brisbane Roar is supposed to be one of the powerhouses of the league, 5 trophies, and evey year we see the same news about them. Players not paid. "Let's blame the owners.". No, let's not blame the owners. Let's blame the club and let's blame the city of Brisbane itself. It's about time this club became sustainable instead of having to rely on an owner like an unborn baby relies on his/her mother to be. A while back I posted my opinion on why this club is always in crisis, and I put it down to the hicksville mentality of Brisbane the city. And some of you thought I was trolling and had a crack at me. Well fuck you, what I said was on point. Brisbane just doesn't do socca. What do you have to say for yourselves now you fuckwitts? The city of Brisbane is bringing the whole league down. I can understand Newcastle being in this position, but Brisbane? A city of 2M plus people, with pretty much only the Broncos to compete with, with 5 trophies in its cabinet, and the Roar can't pay its players. Get fucken.Kick them out the league FFS. Most trophies and top 3 or 4 crowd average over the history of A-League. What a shame they aren't more successful. Fold the league.
|
|
|
RedFunk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWhat a shitstain on the league this news is....AGAIN. Brisbane Roar is supposed to be one of the powerhouses of the league, 5 trophies, and evey year we see the same news about them. Players not paid. "Let's blame the owners.". No, let's not blame the owners. Let's blame the club and let's blame the city of Brisbane itself. It's about time this club became sustainable instead of having to rely on an owner like an unborn baby relies on his/her mother to be. A while back I posted my opinion on why this club is always in crisis, and I put it down to the hicksville mentality of Brisbane the city. And some of you thought I was trolling and had a crack at me. Well fuck you, what I said was on point. Brisbane just doesn't do socca. What do you have to say for yourselves now you fuckwitts? The city of Brisbane is bringing the whole league down. I can understand Newcastle being in this position, but Brisbane? A city of 2M plus people, with pretty much only the Broncos to compete with, with 5 trophies in its cabinet, and the Roar can't pay its players. Get fucken.Kick them out the league FFS. Most trophies and top 3 or 4 crowd average over the history of A-League. What a shame they aren't more successful. Fold the league. He says Brisbane is not a soccer state but are in the top 4 for crowds averages in the A-League so that is good for a so called non soccer state. I think this guy is a few marbles short.
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWhat a shitstain on the league this news is....AGAIN. Brisbane Roar is supposed to be one of the powerhouses of the league, 5 trophies, and evey year we see the same news about them. Players not paid. "Let's blame the owners.". No, let's not blame the owners. Let's blame the club and let's blame the city of Brisbane itself. It's about time this club became sustainable instead of having to rely on an owner like an unborn baby relies on his/her mother to be. A while back I posted my opinion on why this club is always in crisis, and I put it down to the hicksville mentality of Brisbane the city. And some of you thought I was trolling and had a crack at me. Well fuck you, what I said was on point. Brisbane just doesn't do socca. What do you have to say for yourselves now you fuckwitts? The city of Brisbane is bringing the whole league down. I can understand Newcastle being in this position, but Brisbane? A city of 2M plus people, with pretty much only the Broncos to compete with, with 5 trophies in its cabinet, and the Roar can't pay its players. Get fucken.Kick them out the league FFS. Most trophies and top 3 or 4 crowd average over the history of A-League. What a shame they aren't more successful. Fold the league. Most trophies? Not at the elite level.
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
Davo1985
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+x+xWhat a shitstain on the league this news is....AGAIN. Brisbane Roar is supposed to be one of the powerhouses of the league, 5 trophies, and evey year we see the same news about them. Players not paid. "Let's blame the owners.". No, let's not blame the owners. Let's blame the club and let's blame the city of Brisbane itself. It's about time this club became sustainable instead of having to rely on an owner like an unborn baby relies on his/her mother to be. A while back I posted my opinion on why this club is always in crisis, and I put it down to the hicksville mentality of Brisbane the city. And some of you thought I was trolling and had a crack at me. Well fuck you, what I said was on point. Brisbane just doesn't do socca. What do you have to say for yourselves now you fuckwitts? The city of Brisbane is bringing the whole league down. I can understand Newcastle being in this position, but Brisbane? A city of 2M plus people, with pretty much only the Broncos to compete with, with 5 trophies in its cabinet, and the Roar can't pay its players. Get fucken.Kick them out the league FFS. Most trophies and top 3 or 4 crowd average over the history of A-League. What a shame they aren't more successful. Fold the league. Most trophies? Not at the elite level. What "elite" level would that be? Oh please don't say it.
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWhat a shitstain on the league this news is....AGAIN. Brisbane Roar is supposed to be one of the powerhouses of the league, 5 trophies, and evey year we see the same news about them. Players not paid. "Let's blame the owners.". No, let's not blame the owners. Let's blame the club and let's blame the city of Brisbane itself. It's about time this club became sustainable instead of having to rely on an owner like an unborn baby relies on his/her mother to be. A while back I posted my opinion on why this club is always in crisis, and I put it down to the hicksville mentality of Brisbane the city. And some of you thought I was trolling and had a crack at me. Well fuck you, what I said was on point. Brisbane just doesn't do socca. What do you have to say for yourselves now you fuckwitts? The city of Brisbane is bringing the whole league down. I can understand Newcastle being in this position, but Brisbane? A city of 2M plus people, with pretty much only the Broncos to compete with, with 5 trophies in its cabinet, and the Roar can't pay its players. Get fucken.Kick them out the league FFS. Most trophies and top 3 or 4 crowd average over the history of A-League. What a shame they aren't more successful. Fold the league. Most trophies? Not at the elite level. What "elite" level would that be? Oh please don't say it. Think of it like this The elite level is the sun, and all the incidental comps/trophies (ie womens, youth, most well behaved kids in the class) are planets that revolve around that sun. You take away the sun and the planets die. This is true for 99.9% of sports. Not just football. Sorry dont shoot the messenger.
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
Gazzza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhat a shitstain on the league this news is....AGAIN. Brisbane Roar is supposed to be one of the powerhouses of the league, 5 trophies, and evey year we see the same news about them. Players not paid. "Let's blame the owners.". No, let's not blame the owners. Let's blame the club and let's blame the city of Brisbane itself. It's about time this club became sustainable instead of having to rely on an owner like an unborn baby relies on his/her mother to be. A while back I posted my opinion on why this club is always in crisis, and I put it down to the hicksville mentality of Brisbane the city. And some of you thought I was trolling and had a crack at me. Well fuck you, what I said was on point. Brisbane just doesn't do socca. What do you have to say for yourselves now you fuckwitts? The city of Brisbane is bringing the whole league down. I can understand Newcastle being in this position, but Brisbane? A city of 2M plus people, with pretty much only the Broncos to compete with, with 5 trophies in its cabinet, and the Roar can't pay its players. Get fucken.Kick them out the league FFS. Oh look its this dipshit again, no one gives a shit about your pathetic rants about Brisbane Roar.
|
|
|
SWandP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Thread has pages of bigotry, profiling, abuse, ignorance and 2 out of 3 posts are pathetic trolls. It's a thread with a subject (yes it had one) shared by other threads on the same page.
It's everything that 442 Forums has come to stand for!
Any decent BBS would have locked it by page 3.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThread has pages of bigotry, profiling, abuse, ignorance and 2 out of 3 posts are pathetic trolls. It's a thread with a subject (yes it had one) shared by other threads on the same page. It's everything that 442 Forums has come to stand for! Any decent BBS would have locked it by page 3. Yeah no idea where the mods are. -PB
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThread has pages of bigotry, profiling, abuse, ignorance and 2 out of 3 posts are pathetic trolls. It's a thread with a subject (yes it had one) shared by other threads on the same page. It's everything that 442 Forums has come to stand for! Any decent BBS would have locked it by page 3. Yeah no idea where the mods are. -PB Bring back the one-stop Circus thread
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
primtech
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 172,
Visits: 0
|
The fact this club has won more games than any other since the leagues inception despite being in a constant state of crisis for almost its whole existence speaks volume about the quality of football played by the other clubs.
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe fact this club has won more games than any other since the leagues inception despite being in a constant state of crisis for almost its whole existence speaks volume about the quality of football played by the other clubs. 😂😂😂😂
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe fact this club has won more games than any other since the leagues inception despite being in a constant state of crisis for almost its whole existence speaks volume about the quality of football played by the other clubs. 😂😂😂😂 123 wins, leading Victory by 3. Victory would be ahead if you counted Cup and Asian matches though.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThe fact this club has won more games than any other since the leagues inception despite being in a constant state of crisis for almost its whole existence speaks volume about the quality of football played by the other clubs. 😂😂😂😂 123 wins, leading Victory by 3. Victory would be ahead if you counted Cup and Asian matches though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Townsville_Football_CupBR did get 2 wins in the Townsville Cup.
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThe fact this club has won more games than any other since the leagues inception despite being in a constant state of crisis for almost its whole existence speaks volume about the quality of football played by the other clubs. 😂😂😂😂 123 wins, leading Victory by 3. Victory would be ahead if you counted Cup and Asian matches though. http://www.aleaguestats.com/ALeagueStats_8AllTimeTable.htmlHead-to-head (only counting matches between A-League sides), Brisbane & Victory are tied at 138 wins each. Purely within the A-League (League & Finals matches only), Brisbane have 134 wins, Victory 130.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThe fact this club has won more games than any other since the leagues inception despite being in a constant state of crisis for almost its whole existence speaks volume about the quality of football played by the other clubs. 😂😂😂😂 123 wins, leading Victory by 3. Victory would be ahead if you counted Cup and Asian matches though. http://www.aleaguestats.com/ALeagueStats_8AllTimeTable.htmlHead-to-head (only counting matches between A-League sides), Brisbane & Victory are tied at 138 wins each. Purely within the A-League (League & Finals matches only), Brisbane have 134 wins, Victory 130. How'd this become a MV BR dick measuring contest? My initial comment was just for a joke of a club BR seem to do OK. Imagine if they had their shit together.
|
|
|
HortoMagiko
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xThe fact this club has won more games than any other since the leagues inception despite being in a constant state of crisis for almost its whole existence speaks volume about the quality of football played by the other clubs. 😂😂😂😂 123 wins, leading Victory by 3. Victory would be ahead if you counted Cup and Asian matches though. http://www.aleaguestats.com/ALeagueStats_8AllTimeTable.htmlHead-to-head (only counting matches between A-League sides), Brisbane & Victory are tied at 138 wins each. Purely within the A-League (League & Finals matches only), Brisbane have 134 wins, Victory 130. How'd this become a MV BR dick measuring contest? My initial comment was just for a joke of a club BR seem to do OK. Imagine if they had their shit together. Yeah and imagine if i was taller. Or if you won the lottery. Imagine all the people.
Is Wellington diverse? Dont know, however this is a club that has no historical or existing link to a specific migrant group - Rusty Einstein
The negative stereotypes are perpetuated by people who either have no idea or are serving a vested interest; neither viewpoint should get anywhere near running Australian football - Ange Postecoglou
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xThe fact this club has won more games than any other since the leagues inception despite being in a constant state of crisis for almost its whole existence speaks volume about the quality of football played by the other clubs. 😂😂😂😂 123 wins, leading Victory by 3. Victory would be ahead if you counted Cup and Asian matches though. http://www.aleaguestats.com/ALeagueStats_8AllTimeTable.htmlHead-to-head (only counting matches between A-League sides), Brisbane & Victory are tied at 138 wins each. Purely within the A-League (League & Finals matches only), Brisbane have 134 wins, Victory 130. How'd this become a MV BR dick measuring contest? My initial comment was just for a joke of a club BR seem to do OK. Imagine if they had their shit together. Agree. BR are already unsurpassed multiple champions of Australian football and the football fraternity had them crowned as the best footballing team ever even with the Bakries in charge, but cash flow issues can be distracting
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Was wondering how the Mulvey issue had gone since last year
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
You have to wonder whether the current HAL Club business model is working with all the various teams experiencing financial difficulties recently. No-one will keep pumping money into a loss making business indefinitely so these sorts of situations will continue to reoccur until all the clubs become financially viable. With all of Roars success, the fact they cant pay bills before season start is a real concern. Interestingly the Queensland Lions from which the Roar was originally created are still running successfully in the QPL (club membership of over 23,000, with 210 gaming machines) and from what I understand, the financial issues facing the Roar started when they cut ties with Queensland Lions in 2008 and have been ongoing ever since. This makes you wonder whether the "stand alone franchise" model is sustainable long term and whether teams like Roar, Jets, and Mariners may be better off engaging/partnering with local clubs to increase community engagement and improve financial viability. PS This is not a troll about trying to bring back the NSL.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYou have to wonder whether the current HAL Club business model is working with all the various teams experiencing financial difficulties recently. No-one will keep pumping money into a loss making business indefinitely so these sorts of situations will continue to reoccur until all the clubs become financially viable. With all of Roars success, the fact they cant pay bills before season start is a real concern. Interestingly the Queensland Lions from which the Roar was originally created are still running successfully in the QPL (club membership of over 23,000, with 210 gaming machines) and from what I understand, the financial issues facing the Roar started when they cut ties with Queensland Lions in 2008 and have been ongoing ever since. This makes you wonder whether the "stand alone franchise" model is sustainable long term and whether teams like Roar, Jets, and Mariners may be better off engaging/partnering with local clubs to increase community engagement and improve financial viability. PS This is not a troll about trying to bring back the NSL. It seems like unless BR fans are willing to accept a MC style take over the club will continue to struggle if they dont downsize the venue they play at. The reason I wrote Aston Villa on the forum is their new owner wants to eventually buy a club in Australia, India and China under the Villa umbrella (or he has gone on record saying it anyway). Seems like a good fit to me. I dont think it is likely a new owner will come in and be willing to keep things as they are.
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYou have to wonder whether the current HAL Club business model is working with all the various teams experiencing financial difficulties recently. No-one will keep pumping money into a loss making business indefinitely so these sorts of situations will continue to reoccur until all the clubs become financially viable. With all of Roars success, the fact they cant pay bills before season start is a real concern. Interestingly the Queensland Lions from which the Roar was originally created are still running successfully in the QPL (club membership of over 23,000, with 210 gaming machines) and from what I understand, the financial issues facing the Roar started when they cut ties with Queensland Lions in 2008 and have been ongoing ever since. This makes you wonder whether the "stand alone franchise" model is sustainable long term and whether teams like Roar, Jets, and Mariners may be better off engaging/partnering with local clubs to increase community engagement and improve financial viability. PS This is not a troll about trying to bring back the NSL. No choice of model will fix the problem, it will just hide it differently. BR will not make money on 14k fans to 13 games in a 52k seat stadium, especially with the Queensland only additional expenses lumped on top. The environment is simply too tough to operate in in Brisbane. They need their own ground. Rather than spotting 2 million a year in bailouts it should be a loan repayment on improvements to something we own - Perry Park.
|
|
|
Mr B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 1
|
+x+xYou have to wonder whether the current HAL Club business model is working with all the various teams experiencing financial difficulties recently. No-one will keep pumping money into a loss making business indefinitely so these sorts of situations will continue to reoccur until all the clubs become financially viable. With all of Roars success, the fact they cant pay bills before season start is a real concern. Interestingly the Queensland Lions from which the Roar was originally created are still running successfully in the QPL (club membership of over 23,000, with 210 gaming machines) and from what I understand, the financial issues facing the Roar started when they cut ties with Queensland Lions in 2008 and have been ongoing ever since. This makes you wonder whether the "stand alone franchise" model is sustainable long term and whether teams like Roar, Jets, and Mariners may be better off engaging/partnering with local clubs to increase community engagement and improve financial viability. PS This is not a troll about trying to bring back the NSL. No choice of model will fix the problem, it will just hide it differently. BR will not make money on 14k fans to 13 games in a 52k seat stadium, especially with the Queensland only additional expenses lumped on top. The environment is simply too tough to operate in in Brisbane. They need their own ground. Rather than spotting 2 million a year in bailouts it should be a loan repayment on improvements to something we own - Perry Park. Yep, summed up well bohemia. We will be forever doomed if Roar continue to play out of Suncorp, something big really needs to happen for things to change in this state and that big thing could be losing the 3rd club in Qld from the A-League, Brisbane Roar, Stadiums Queensland is a joke.
|
|
|
crimsoncrusoe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.9K,
Visits: 0
|
As much as we all would like cheap stadiums to push up profit for clubs,people need to understand this is not where most clubs are going to make big money in Australia. Surely the aim should be to generate income from the othe sources which are not dependent on costs.....Media rights and sponsorship . If twice as many watched football on tv ,the bottom line of each club would improve much more than if they doubled at the game. At Suncorp Stadium for example,my u derstanding is that the costs jump as the crowd hits certain levels.So 15k might be the first break even level and then at 30k the costs jump again.
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAs much as we all would like cheap stadiums to push up profit for clubs,people need to understand this is not where most clubs are going to make big money in Australia.Surely the aim should be to generate income from the othe sources which are not dependent on costs.....Media rights and sponsorship .If twice as many watched football on tv ,the bottom line of each club would improve much more than if they doubled at the game.At Suncorp Stadium for example,my u derstanding is that the costs jump as the crowd hits certain levels.So 15k might be the first break even level and then at 30k the costs jump again. Of the top of my head the various ways clubs make money include: TV rights, sponsorship, matchday revenue, transfers
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
+xAs much as we all would like cheap stadiums to push up profit for clubs,people need to understand this is not where most clubs are going to make big money in Australia.Surely the aim should be to generate income from the othe sources which are not dependent on costs.....Media rights and sponsorship .If twice as many watched football on tv ,the bottom line of each club would improve much more than if they doubled at the game.At Suncorp Stadium for example,my u derstanding is that the costs jump as the crowd hits certain levels.So 15k might be the first break even level and then at 30k the costs jump again. Issue isn't only the profit, but 13K in a 52K stadium looks bad on TV and as a spectator the atmosphere is terrible. Its very hard to attract sponsors & media when it appears no one is interested.
|
|
|
maxxie
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
I think we'd all love for BR to get out of the money pit that is Suncorp, but it really doesn't seem realistic without some major policy changes from FFA re stadium requirements AND upfront investment from the club. The simplest solution is that BR get their shit together and build the fan base to average 20k so they stop haemorrhaging money out of Suncorp.
Even with all the mismanagement and clusterfuckery of the last couple of years, if their deal at Suncorp was on par with stadium deals other a-league clubs have, things wouldn't be nearly as dire.
|
|
|
scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Keep telling yourself that Pauly. 3 x Premiers 3 x Champions 1 x Cup You've been long since surpassed. Well that and you're even more of a financial joke than the Jets right now.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xKeep telling yourself that Pauly.3 x Premiers3 x Champions1 x CupYou've been long since surpassed. Well that and you're even more of a financial joke than the Jets right now. Keep telling yourself scottyboy. Championships is the one that counts, the pinnacle of success. Champions of Australia. FA cup which MV could only attract 6,000 to a do or die home semi final confirms it's merely a preseason warm-up comp.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|