32 EXISTING clubs, will agree to a selection process which, from my understanding, will take into consideration sporting performance over a period of time, suitability of home facilities, club administration set up, coaching standards and academy set up in place, women's team and technical director, financial capabilities etc etc. ALL things that not only did WU not have in place when granted a license in 2018 but also still doesn't have now 3 years later!!!...  Of these 32 clubs 12 will be chosen with another 4 to be added in consecutive years yet ALL these teams will then have a clear pathway to being able to gain promotion to this top league - with a timeframe AND a clear direction of what the process will be. Sure a few of the teams will be hard done by not being included in the first batch of 12 I expect that to happen for sure but even if South isn't chosen (which I doubt) at least we know what we have to do to get in.... A lot fairer than bidding for a license and despite meeting criteria and offering the same if not more money for a license being told that our bid was unsuccessful because ... well you all know my thoughts on that by now :)

Wonder if the Apl will expand the A League by two teams initially, besides the 12 initial teams that the FA will choose (with 4 after that) for the Second Division.
This is definitely a grey area. 
(O-lym-pic!!)

two distinct leagues matey...  I dont think APL will concern themselves with this too much apart from trying to stop it from ever happening that is... Aleague expansion will clearly just be new franchise investment for the forceable future.... Olympic is better off joining the championship see you at Lakeside in two years? ahahahahahah

New entities like say Canberra (Capital Region bid) and Tasmania (Sth Hobart fc) perhaps. They could then promote two out of the Second Division in afew years to get to 16 teams in the A League..
At Lakeside, I'll be in the blue & white section...lol!

it is wonderful news.
i too wonder about the selection process for this league. as you outlined, there are clear criteria but its hard not to see politics and self interest being factors.  they will need a very strong and transparent body to push it through, which hopefully will show the (f)fa what they should have been doing in the last decade and half. 

Given the noises from Wollongong I would be surprised to see them along with Canberra announced as 13th and 14th for the A-League sooner rather than later and Tasmania *with Govt/Wilkie support" and another area announced as the next 2 potential areas provided they come up with the support needed.  Tasmania will be the problem child I think. . I think they will need Govt support but can't see govt support of the size needed for a NSD team. So does South Hobart become the feeder club to Tassie United with an upgraded stadium and South Hobart play in the NSD/TAS NPL on alternate weeks?  

The only entities that could be ready might be Canberra and South Melbourne. Others may have to win entry via 2nd div.
I still do not know what homeground that is up to speed, a s/e qld team would use as things stand..
That one is the hologram to me, unsubstantial.

disappointing news.
along with canberra, they are the next obvious choices. (from a geographical/historical POV)

Aren't Tassie the bid that have Gov backing and that they would reconfigure a ground to being rectangle? Abit of a grey area.

Wolves would have to be one of the best prepared existing clubs for making the step up to A-League level. They have a great side on the pitch (national NPL winners in 2019), a perfect home ground, large support base, club history, and one of the country's best regional talent supply lines. They just need a backer, but there should support for an A-League team in the local business community.

By contrast, there's no way an existing NPL team from Tassie or the ACT could cut it even in the NSD. They will have to be represented by new broadbased entities, either in the A-League or NSD. If they don't make the cut for the A-League, then hopefully the NSD selection process will be open to this in under-represented regions.

I agree - my original post was miswritten 


1st line should have read 

Given the noises from Wollongong I wouldn't be surprised to see them along with Canberra announced as 13th and 14th for the A-League sooner rather than later 


Yep - that's what I was trying to say.

My feeling is that they will expedite a round of expansion to 14 teams very quickly, probably in time for the 2022 winter season. Hence why the last couple of seasons have been 26 rounds, despite how awkward the season structures have been. They seem unwilling to go to 33 rounds with the current 12 team set-up, so going to 14 teams and a strahgt double round-robin makes sense. Hopefully they then go to 16 quickly as well, so we can at least get a semi-respectable 30-round season.

It wont as long as AAFC have any say in the matter. 3,,000 min stadium, a juniors and women's setup,  academy, coaches with A license, technical director, a few years history of performance in npl, established links to community... these are the criteria the nsd will and should be founded on... Wollongong as I said will romp it home but which investor or franchisee is going to fork out to establish a club from scratch like this only to play in a second tier league? Much easier to say you represent a "Geographic area" pay the license fee (or at least promise to one day pay it) piggy back a junior setup from another npl team on the other side of the city and a womens one too and become an Aleague club.Thats what a "mainstream" Tassie or Canberra club should do, agreed.  Much better to keep the two leagues separate clubs vs franchises that way the new expanded franchise system gets a chance to grow to the optimal 16 geographically spread teams and also to give it a chance to mature and for the franchises to go in the direction their ownership group want to go with the entertainment side of things. NSD,  NPL, state leagues and below, all linked together, should be all about club culture first and foremost, No more dictating who does what in soccer, no more  classifying clubs by the league structure they are in but rather let them plot their own journey,  If for example, a club like Canberra Olympic wants to be ambitious, their volunteer board can sit down after Thursday night training, and work out how to raise revenue,  improve facilities, attract better players and make the  most  of the chance to join a national comp which would further increase their potential for revenue, etc etc. Or they can be content to sit in NPL ACT or State 1 ACT and just act as a local grassroots club that is happy to guide the love for the game the local kids have and proud to occasionally produce the odd A league or even Socceroos player... Linking all the clubs in Australia is a powerful thing mate, no need to worry about geographic mainstream representation when Darwin Rovers have the same avenue to the NSD as APIA Leichardt. If there is a true appetite for national league representation amongst a region, community, ethnic  or otherwise, they WILL find a way to climb to the top. If they can't or a specific area is not represented then they didnt want it badly enough or the demand is just not there so no loss anyway.

Count South out mate, where going all in for NSD,  maybe un 20 years or so when tbere might ve oro rel between tbe Aleague and below.

Let's say the A-League doesn't expand to Canberra, and the NSD is taking bids for clubs. It receives a bid from the CRFC group, with major financial backing, the promise to unite the region's footballing community (like Newcastle or Adelaide have done) and push for promotion to the A-League, and a bid from Canberra Olympic. No matter how ambitious the latter is, and how well they've done on the park, the NSD would be mad to pick it over a broadbased bid. Why? Because Canberra is such a small city that it needs a club that unifies the entire football support base, whereas Olympic can only ever reach at best 10% of football fans in the ACT, since the rest already owe their allegiance to other NPL clubs, and probably hate Olympic with a passion, so will never switch over, much as South Melbourne fans wouldn't go over to supporting Heidelberg if they had managed to get a spot in the A-League (for example).

These kind of rivalries can work in the big cities which will be represented by a multitude of clubs regardless. But places like Canberra, Hobart, Wollongong, Gold Coast, Geelong, etc. need to have a one team-one town model (with lower level clubs in the area playing at NPL level or below). Wollongong and the Gold Coast already have this by dint of playing in large NPL divisions, but Canberra and Hobart are inhibited by the fact that they have their own state leagues, so are structurally prevented from having a unified team until they can play in a nationwide tier (short of playing in larger neighbouring states' NPLs, which maybe they should consider as an interim measure).

I get what you are saying and ofcourse the financial implications of a serious backer willing to throw money into "creating" a team in Canberra would certainly be hard to turn down but why would any investor do this? Why invest in a second tier comp that is going to have minimal revenue generation and probably zero return on investment and no guarantee of ever being linked up with the Aleague? The NSD isnt ultimately about generating profit or revenue and being accountable to shareholders and investors as the clubs pushing for this are all not for-profit, volunteer run clubs and any income stream goes straight back into the club which in turn creates an ecosystem of aspirational clubs that can better their coaching systems, administrators with more experience and professionalism and more importantly player pathways that can lead to the betterment of our national playing pool.

 Sure if this is a commercial success the money will improve professionalism to the point where regular NSD power teams may well become similar to Aleague clubs but I think that is far far into the future if ever. Its not so much who supports it if that makes sense (although obviously a bare minimium of support and interest are needed to pay for the bloody thing) as that is what function the Aleague serves, its more important that it exists..

Dont worry about little Canberra Olympic they may or may not be up to the challenge of national tier soccer but at least the path will be open to them. Of course there are supporters of other NPL clubs that hate Olympic, thats the beauty of it.... If none of the NPL clubs in ACT manage to get enough support behind them AND ambition to make it to the  NSD then clearly there is no market or appetite for national soccer in that market....  Your analogy of South and the Bergers is valid in that we both lost fans to the Victory but not all of them, many Iike myself in the early days, just switched off altogether and didnt pick any team... I know old friends that havent been back to the soccer for 16 years  but this talk of rejuvination has them excited to come back to Hellas. Well, for a club like Canberra Olympic they dont have to loose their fans to a new entity, they can keep their local rivalries and if good enough or strong enough they can ve promoted... Do you not think local ACT soccer will benefit wirh having  3 or 4 clubs all bashing in each others heads to get to the "top" be the big club, attract all the sponsors and best players? Competitiveness, it's a son of a bitch but it creates wonders.

Well almost all the bids in the running for the last A-League expansion have regularly indicated that they would be interested in applying for inclusion in a second division (except "Southern Expansion" and Fremantle, and I guess Team XI has now partnered up with City). What's in it for places like Canberra is the city would then have a team in a national sporting competition that the entire city can unite behind, which would be capable of battling for promotion to the top flight (and with decent backing would have a credible chance at achieving this).

The existing club based bids indicated they would be happy with joining in a second division sure, as being clubs, their main goal is to compete at the highest tier available to them. Of the "new" concerns only Canberra did from memory as WU backers definitely stated that a second division would not be financially viable for the building of their famed stadium on which the whole deal hinged. Even the Canberra bid however, would have agreed to second tier entry only if there was a foreseeable link to the A-league via promotion in the future which based on what is proposed I dont see happening for decades yet. 

This is it.
If there is no possibility of promotion to the A-League for the next 15 years, then you'd have to rocks in your head to invest millions into a new club just to play semi-professional football in the NSD.

Great to see, lets hope this gets of the ground as it could largely benefit our game in Australia.

30 rounds are Spot On digga!

Forget 2nd div in 2022, in a Winter comp it would min be 2023. Galatas made that Clear!!! on SBS talking with Lucy Z and Nick S. Well, they can shove it whether they have it or not. If the choice is going the long or the short road, it's always going to be the long road.

So you don't want this to happen now? Why mate?
Agree 2023 winter is a bit long to wait but the upside is that at least it gives the NPLs two full seasons of "data" so that performance on the pitch can be used as one of the criteria for the first 12 clubs. Also allows clubs that may not be "strong" enough now to at least get their ducks in a row and make a push for inclusion.
What is the alternative to this, nothing?

surely an a league team for canberra utd would be a no brainer?

Canberra is where teams go to die.  There and the Gold Coast.  5k the first year 3k every year after that.

Ella mate, it takes too long to do their research. Clubs are keen to come in. Malakes always looking for red tape.
Turn my attention to something else, if something ever actually happens good for football.
Go Hellas!

I get your frustration but weve been waiting 16 years whats 2 more? If thats what it takes to have the kind of system that they should have looked to set up back in 77 with the first inklings of a national league then it will be worth the wait.... This is a big step for the sport here megale, much bigger than the unbundling you keep mentioning, maybe not for the professional side but clubland and the national teams of all ages both mens and womens will greatly benefit from this if it goes ahead imo.The major hurdle, as always, will be the cartel Lowey the bastard set up in 2005.  JJ and some at FA may want this to go ahead  but there are still Fat Nick and dumb Greg to contend with and uncle scumbag Frank has his hand deep in their pockets squeezing their tiny ballakia. My personal conspiracy theory is that they engaged the AAFC to create a financial report for this thinking the wogs will tear each other apart before agreeing to anything and so they can always state they tried a second division but it failed at the gate. Ask yourself this,  its been 2 days now and, unless I missed it, not a peep out of FA, APL or PFA.....not even an acknowledgement that a significant report has been drafted in line with their 11 principals and as per the committee the FFA established to create an evaluation task force for such a thing.... What about or famous soccer journos, Especially that arsehole Rugari?  They are quick to jump on any A league feel good story and love to write about those nasty NSL clubs that cause all the riots, dont pay their players, are un-Australian and want a national second division that they cant even afford ... well AAFC have "shown them the money" why dont these f#ckers reply??? 

Yeah, I agree but I wonder why the fabled international investors behind the Canberra bid chose to go as a stand alone license instead of aligning themselves with the Wleague club? 

Atm 3k in Canberra would be pretty good for Aleague..... not even trying to be smart.

Agreed that new entities need the carrot of A-League promotion, but I really don't think it's that far off. If the NSD proves to be viable it will only be a matter of time. Probably once the A-League has maxed out expansion to 16 teams, but that will likely be sooner rather than later. I think 2025 is the most likely scenario. The A-League needs something to bring it back to life, and the life-or-death scenario of pro-rel is probably the thing to do it.

I don't really see the licenses as being an issue: the performance criteria can just be changed to not finishing in the bottom two in a given season (or whatever).