|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Last night I looked up Nathan Lyon's figures to discover he is a great!
He has something like 333 wickets in 81 Tests!
He is 25th in ranking number of Test wickets of all bowlers to play international cricket.
GOAT is 4th highest Aussie wicket taker after Warne, McGrath and Lillee, yet he has had such a low profile and media interest in comparison.
Lyon is the 7th top spinner of all time for all cricket nations.
GOAT isn't the only one.
tWhen I looked a stats, Sangakarra is in the top 10 batters of all time in run aggregates. He accumulated over 10 000 runs, with possibly the highest average of 58. Yet I've barely heard of him. Why? He has hardly played Test cricket in Australia.
Ditto his spinning teammate, Herath. Until the last series against Sri Lanka , I'd barely heard of him. Why? Herath is ahead of Lyon in international wicket taking ranks.
It may have been Baggers today, but he mentioned BJ Watling is also a pretty decent wicketkeeper/batter, boasting a batting average of 38. He is virtually unknown in Australia.
From what I've seen in New Zealand it is harder to score runs than here. Players like Richard Hadlee and Martin Crowe had huge profiles in Australia, but few Kiwi players have since. Yet Kane Williamson is currently ranked third in the world as a batter. Relatively, he has had a low profile too.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xLast night I looked up Nathan Lyon's figures to discover he is a great! He has something like 333 wickets in 81 Tests! He is 25th in ranking number of Test wickets of all bowlers to play international cricket. GOAT is 4th highest Aussie wicket taker after Warne, McGrath and Lillee, yet he has had such a low profile and media interest in comparison. Lyon is the 7th top spinner of all time for all cricket nations. GOAT isn't the only one. When I looked stats, Sangakarra is in the top 10 batters of all time in run aggregates accumulation govern 10 000 runs, with possibly the highest average of 58. Yet I've barely heard of him. Why? He has hardly played Test cricket in Australia. Ditto his spinning teammate, Herath. Util the last series against Sri Lanka , I'd barely heard of him. Why? Herath is ahead of Lyon in international wicket taking ranks. It may have been Baggers today, but he mentioned BJ Watling is also a pretty decent wicketkeeper/batter, boasting a batting average of 38. He is virtually unknown in Australia. From what I've seen in New Zealand it is harder to score runs than here. Players like Richard Hadlee and Martin Crowe had huge profiles in Australia, but few Kiwi players since have. Yet Kane Williamson is currently ranked third in the world as a batter. Relatively, he has had a low profile too. Thoughts? Kane Williamson is currently ranked 2. In Aug 2014 -Martin Crowe announced to the world that Kohli, Smith, Root and Williamson would become the 4 best batsmen of this generation. He called them the fab 4. And he was right.... I can link you the article - what makes it impressive is that only Root was averaging huge at the time... Sanga averages over 60 as a specialist batsman and is very highly rated internationally. One of the best I ever saw play - but he suffered for not playing for a Big 3 team. Ditto KW... Herath is okay - but needed Asian conditions... Murali's shadow looms large... Lyon averages over 30 (career, India, SL and UAE) - he is a modern great - but he's not going down as a great till he remedies this. More countries host test matches than just Australia - I blame FTA ch 9.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Jacques Kallis has amazing stats, but has rarely been considered a great until very late in his career in Australia. I think he is 3rd, behind Tendulkar and Ponting, as greatest run scorers of all time.
As a batter Kallis had a very slow strike rate in Tests of something like 38. Whereas Pointing had something like a SR of 60.
The difference late in their respective careers, was Ponting started fading quickly much earlier in age than Kallis and his average dropped markedly from circa 60 to 52.
On the other hand, Kallis retired still close to an average of 58!
Moreover, Kallis was a really handy fast medium bowler for nearly all of his career. In terms of being good for a long period of his career, and as an all rounder, Kallis may be the best cricketer ever. Yet we hear little about him in Australia.
We've been far more taken with express bowlers Dale Steyn and Alan Donald from South Africa.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xJacques Kallis is has amazing stats, but has rarely been considered a great until very late in his career in Australia. I think he is 3rd, behind Tendulkar and Ponting as greatest run scorers of all time. As a batter Kallis had a very slow strike rate in Tests of something like 38. Whereas Pointing had something like a SR of 60. The difference late in their respective careers, was Ponting started fading quickly much earlier in age than Kallis and his average dropped markedly from circa 60 to 52. On the other hand, Kallis retired still close to an average of 58! Moreover, Kallis was a really handy fast medium bowler for nearly all of his career. In terms of being good for a long period of his career, and as an all rounder, Kallis may be the best cricketer ever. Yet we hear little about him in Australia. We've been far more taken with express bowlers Dale Steyn and Alan Donald from South Africa. Kallis was the worst to watch of Sachin, Punter, Sanga, Lara... he was dour and an accumulator. He makes a lot ATG teams regardless for the all-rounder aspect. Steyn is an ATG. Absilutely.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xJacques Kallis is has amazing stats, but has rarely been considered a great until very late in his career in Australia. I think he is 3rd, behind Tendulkar and Ponting as greatest run scorers of all time. As a batter Kallis had a very slow strike rate in Tests of something like 38. Whereas Pointing had something like a SR of 60. The difference late in their respective careers, was Ponting started fading quickly much earlier in age than Kallis and his average dropped markedly from circa 60 to 52. On the other hand, Kallis retired still close to an average of 58! Moreover, Kallis was a really handy fast medium bowler for nearly all of his career. In terms of being good for a long period of his career, and as an all rounder, Kallis may be the best cricketer ever. Yet we hear little about him in Australia. We've been far more taken with express bowlers Dale Steyn and Alan Donald from South Africa. Kallis was the worst to watch of Sachin, Punter, Sanga, Lara... he was dour and an accumulator. He makes a lot ATG teams regardless for the all-rounder aspect. Steyn is an ATG. Absilutely. True. But Kallis's results have been amazing.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Another of these annoying Murdoch media outlets charging money for anything. What was the paraphrased content of it, Paddles?
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAnother of these annoying Murdoch media outlets charging money for anything. What was the paraphrased content of it, Paddles? That Tim Paine never promised to be a choirboy - I just want to read the article. I find Craddock's reporting this test match quite interesting...
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAnother of these annoying Murdoch media outlets charging money for anything. What was the paraphrased content of it, Paddles? I read that Crash piece too. 10 innings for five fifties and a special 192 in 2007 @60.33 is Sanga's Oz record DC.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xAnother of these annoying Murdoch media outlets charging money for anything. What was the paraphrased content of it, Paddles? I read that Crash piece too. 10 innings for five fifties and a special 192 in 2007 @60.33 is Sanghas Oz record DC. Would you please cut and paste it... I am interested in his choir boy piece and the piece from the day before on the sledging...
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xAnother of these annoying Murdoch media outlets charging money for anything. What was the paraphrased content of it, Paddles? I read that Crash piece too. 10 innings for five fifties and a special 192 in 2007 @60.33 is Sanghas Oz record DC. Would you please cut and paste it... I am interested in his choir boy piece and the piece from the day before on the sledging... Was in the Tele. Have to pay for it online.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Another Kiwi who had a big profile in Australia was Chris Cairns.
I think it was a lot to do with his big hitting in LOC.
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAnother Kiwi who had a big profile in Australia was Chris Cairns. I think it was a lot to do with his big hitting in LOC. Chris Cairns was the son of, so he got a bit of attention because of that. He was actually a very good cricketer at his best and his overall test figures, while not brilliant are quite reasonable. 218 wickets at 29.4 and a batting average of 33.53, but he probably wasted his talent to certain extent. He was too much of all or nothing with the bat. I could not give a shit about his LOC record.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
| IND | 920 | | NZ | 913 | | AUS | 901 | | IND | 846 | | ENG | 807 | | AUS | 795 | | SL | 753 | | SA | 724 | | NZ | 709 | | PAK | 708 |
As promised - the fab 4 article: http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/774705.html
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Good article, Paddles. Thanks for posting it.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xGood article, Paddles. Thanks for posting it. I get a lot of Aus media in NZ - almost all your fox TV content - Aus media is useless at reporting the global game. They pretty much only focus on what's happening in Australia... If you read cricinfo for the wider regions and series including their online magazine- you will get a much broader view on whats going on in the cricket world...
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xGood article, Paddles. Thanks for posting it. I get a lot of Aus media in NZ - almost all your fox content - Aus media is useless at reporting the global game. They pretty much only focus on what's happening in Australia... If you read cricinfo for the wider regions and series including their online magazine- you will get a much broader view on whats going on in the cricket world... I see quite a lot of Test cricket played on Fox between other countries. NZ is a bit early being two hours ahead of EST.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xGood article, Paddles. Thanks for posting it. I get a lot of Aus media in NZ - almost all your fox content - Aus media is useless at reporting the global game. They pretty much only focus on what's happening in Australia... If you read cricinfo for the wider regions and series including their online magazine- you will get a much broader view on whats going on in the cricket world... I see quite a lot of Test cricket played on Fox between other countries. NZ is a bit early being two hours ahead of EST. We have nothing worth watching summer but some ODI games vs India. We're literally going to thrash SL and Bangladesh in the most boring one-sioded contests you could imagine. It is going to be road cricket at its worst as their bowlers just are not upto it... Next year we have England and India... I suspect NZC will lose in Aus - and then hopefully take down England and India in a great series of matches... Pakistan in SA this Xmas could be well worth a watch... Pakistan is arguably on the way up with Babar Azam and Abbas and Safrica on the way down with no batting.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xGood article, Paddles. Thanks for posting it. I get a lot of Aus media in NZ - almost all your fox content - Aus media is useless at reporting the global game. They pretty much only focus on what's happening in Australia... If you read cricinfo for the wider regions and series including their online magazine- you will get a much broader view on whats going on in the cricket world... I see quite a lot of Test cricket played on Fox between other countries. NZ is a bit early being two hours ahead of EST. I suspect NZC will lose in Aus -... I'm not so sure. Last time NZ were here, we had a stronger team then the present one, and Aus only just won! There was a key decision in Adelaide that was critical in the outcome. Unlike many Aussies who berate NZ, I'm widely travelled and have visited the North Island twice. We intend to visit the South Island next time. All my friends and relatives, including me, who have visited think NZ is a fabulous country.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xGood article, Paddles. Thanks for posting it. I get a lot of Aus media in NZ - almost all your fox content - Aus media is useless at reporting the global game. They pretty much only focus on what's happening in Australia... If you read cricinfo for the wider regions and series including their online magazine- you will get a much broader view on whats going on in the cricket world... I see quite a lot of Test cricket played on Fox between other countries. NZ is a bit early being two hours ahead of EST. I suspect NZC will lose in Aus -... I'm not so sure. Last time NZ were here, we had a stronger team then the present one, and Aus only just won! There was a key decision in Adelaide that was critical in the outcome. Unlike many Aussies who berate NZ, I'm widely travelled and have visited the North Island twice. We intend to visit the South Island next time. All my friends and relatives, including me, who have visited think NZ is a fabulous country. Oh - I just don't think NZ has the bowlers to take down Aus in Aus unless there's swing on offer (like Adelaide did at night). Wagner will be key, but besides that - Boult and Southee will struggle. Taylor will be much older - so KW will be leadingg a lone hand again - Latham is a minnow basher... I just see NZC struggling to put it all together. I think Engl will take the Ashes in Eng, whereas I think NZL will beat Eng in Eng next :P It has nothing to do with the countires, its the pitch conditons... Definitely visit Queenstown - in winter if you like snow...
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Hazlewood says he rates Pujara a steelier batsman than Kohli. He would know having bowled plenty of balls to both batsmen this series. What's more I tend to agree. Their Oz records are good but flattered by the roads we dished up on their last tour here four years ago. Both have the one century this tour but for mine Pujara's was the classier and more vital of the two. There are no details of their performances against Pakistan in UAE. | Country | Mat | Inns | NO | 100s | 50s | 0s | HS | Runs | Avg | S/R | Ca | St | | Australia | 5 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 123 | 423 | 42.30 |
|
| India | 36 | 58 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 206* | 3217 | 61.87 |
Kohli Oz record: |
| Country | Mat | Inns | NO | 100s | 50s | 0s | HS | Runs | Avg | S/R | Ca | St | | Australia | 10 | 20 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 169 | 1169 | 58.45 |
| India | 34 | 54 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 243 | 3105 | 64.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWas it Hazlewood that rates Pujara a steelier batsman than Kohli. He would know having bowled plenty of balls to both batsmen this series. What's more I tend to agree. Take a squizz at Kohlis record..some 70% of his runs have been scored on flat Asia sub continent decks. His Oz record is good as is Pujaras who also has excelled on his own decks. Kohli has 6 tons to Pujara's sole one. But remember last tour Kohli flourished on our roads. Pujara Oz record. | Country | Mat | Inns | NO | 100s | 50s | 0s | HS | Runs | Avg | S/R | Ca | St | | Australia | 5 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 123 | 423 | 42.30 |
|
| India | 36 | 58 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 206* | 3217 | 61.87 |
Kohli Oz record: |
| Country | Mat | Inns | NO | 100s | 50s | 0s | HS | Runs | Avg | S/R | Ca | St | | Australia | 10 | 20 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 169 | 1169 | 58.45 |
| India | 34 | 54 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 243 | 3105 | 64.69 |
Kohli isn't rated for his runs on flat sub tracks or raging dustbowls. Its the runs he has taken in Aus, NZ, Eng and SA as well as Asia... There's really little point in even trying to deny that is an extreme batting talent of the highest order... Pujara is much more of a home town bully... He needs more runs in Eng and SA...
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWas it Hazlewood that rates Pujara a steelier batsman than Kohli. He would know having bowled plenty of balls to both batsmen this series. What's more I tend to agree. Take a squizz at Kohlis record..some 70% of his runs have been scored on flat Asia sub continent decks. His Oz record is good as is Pujaras who also has excelled on his own decks. Kohli has 6 tons to Pujara's sole one. But remember last tour Kohli flourished on our roads. Pujara Oz record. | Country | Mat | Inns | NO | 100s | 50s | 0s | HS | Runs | Avg | S/R | Ca | St | | Australia | 5 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 123 | 423 | 42.30 |
|
| India | 36 | 58 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 206* | 3217 | 61.87 |
Kohli Oz record: |
| Country | Mat | Inns | NO | 100s | 50s | 0s | HS | Runs | Avg | S/R | Ca | St | | Australia | 10 | 20 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 169 | 1169 | 58.45 |
| India | 34 | 54 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 243 | 3105 | 64.69 |
Kohli isn't rated for his runs on flat sub tracks or raging dustbowls. Its the runs he has taken in Aus, NZ, Eng and SA as well as Asia... There's really little point in even trying to deny that is an extreme batting talent of the highest order... Pujara is much more of a home town bully... He needs more runs in Eng and SA... Like I said other than the century this match which was very good but lucky.. he dined out on roads last tour to the tune of his other Oz tons. I saw some of his England performances last year and in the main India batted on decks similar to here as they were in the middle of a rare heatwave in the UK. The tracks were dry and batting friendly and suited spin over pace for most of the series according to the Pom coms.. I have not seen him batting in SA or NZ.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWas it Hazlewood that rates Pujara a steelier batsman than Kohli. He would know having bowled plenty of balls to both batsmen this series. What's more I tend to agree. Take a squizz at Kohlis record..some 70% of his runs have been scored on flat Asia sub continent decks. His Oz record is good as is Pujaras who also has excelled on his own decks. Kohli has 6 tons to Pujara's sole one. But remember last tour Kohli flourished on our roads. Pujara Oz record. | Country | Mat | Inns | NO | 100s | 50s | 0s | HS | Runs | Avg | S/R | Ca | St | | Australia | 5 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 123 | 423 | 42.30 |
|
| India | 36 | 58 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 206* | 3217 | 61.87 |
Kohli Oz record: |
| Country | Mat | Inns | NO | 100s | 50s | 0s | HS | Runs | Avg | S/R | Ca | St | | Australia | 10 | 20 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 169 | 1169 | 58.45 |
| India | 34 | 54 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 243 | 3105 | 64.69 |
Kohli isn't rated for his runs on flat sub tracks or raging dustbowls. Its the runs he has taken in Aus, NZ, Eng and SA as well as Asia... There's really little point in even trying to deny that is an extreme batting talent of the highest order... Pujara is much more of a home town bully... He needs more runs in Eng and SA... Like I said other than the century this match which was very good but lucky.. he dined out on the roads last tour to the tune of his other five Oz tons. I saw some of his England performances last year and in the main India batted on decks similar to here as they were in the middle of a rare heatwave in the UK. The tracks were dry and batting friendly for most of the series according to the Pom coms.. I have not seen him batting in SA or NZ. Dude - you're talking utter nonsense about this heat wave making for easy batting conditions again. That's utter rubbish... the games were shootouts inside 4 day contests.... No other batsman from either team scored runs. What you're saying is absolute nonsense.... I watched the games - there were no easy batting conditions, when the heat wave took effect - there was spin - only the last test of 5 had easy batting conditions and it turned. Kohli failed in that test - and Cook made a dbl century... after retiring... | 1 | Virat Kohli | India | 10 | 593 | 59.30 | 57.85 | 67 | 1 | | 2 | Jos Buttler | England | 9 | 349 | 38.78 | 67.77 | 44 | 4 | | 3 | Alastair Cook | England | 9 | 327 | 36.33 | 45.54 | 39 | - | | 4 | Joe Root | England | 9 | 319 | 35.44 | 52.47 | 34 | 1 | | 5 | Lokesh Rahul | India | 10 | 299 | 29.90 | 66.44 | 44 | 1 | | 6 | Cheteshwar Pujara | India | 8 | 278 | 39.71 | 38.29 | 33 | - | | 7 | Sam Curran | England | 7 | 272 | 38.86 | 62.39 | 32 | 5 | | 8 | Ajinkya Rahane | India | 10 | 257 | 25.70 | 40.22 | 27 | - | | 9 | Jonny Bairstow | England | 9 | 230 | 25.56 | 63.54 | 32 | - | | 10 | Ben Stokes | England | 8 | 200 | 25.00 | 38.54 | 22 | 1 | | 11 | Hardik Pandya | India | 8 | 164 | 23.43 | 56.94 | 26 | 1 | | 12 | Keaton Jennings | England | 9 | 163 | 18.11 | 40.25 | 18 | - | | 13 | Shikhar Dhawan | India | 8 | 162 | 20.25 | 55.48 | 23 | - | | 14 | Rishabh Pant | India | 6 | 162 | 27.00 | 64.29 | 20 | 6 |
Dude - I really don't the Aus fan obsession with how someone went in Aus... Aus has not won in India since 2004. Not won in Eng since 2001. Got smashed back to back in Pakistan and then smashed Sri Lanka... Lost at home three times in a row to Safrica... How someone goes in Australia maybe used to matter in the McGrath and Warne era... but its really not a big deal now...
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Does this seriously look like easy batting conditions to you? SeriesMatch Type 0" class=""> Top 20| POS | PLAYER | CURRENT TEAM | MATCH | INNS | ECO | AVG | SR |
|---|
| 1 | James Anderson | England | 5 | 10 | 2.37 | 18.12 | 45.92 | | 2 | Ravichandran Ashwin | India | 4 | 7 | 2.58 | 32.73 | 76.18 | | 3 | Jasprit Bumrah | India | 3 | 6 | 2.72 | 25.93 | 57.14 | | 4 | Chris Woakes | England | 2 | 4 | 2.88 | 20.88 | 43.50 | | 5 | Ishant Sharma | India | 5 | 9 | 2.89 | 24.28 | 50.33 | | 6 | Stuart Broad | England | 5 | 10 | 3.13 | 29.69 | 56.94 | | 7 | Umesh Yadav | India | 1 | 2 | 3.17 | 25.33 | 48.00 | | 8 | Moeen Ali | England | 2 | 4 | 3.32 | 21.00 | 38.00 | | 9 | Sam Curran | England | 4 | 8 | 3.33 | 23.55 | 42.36 | | 10 | Ravindra Jadeja | India | 1 | 2 | 3.35 | 36.86 | 66.00 | | 11 | Ben Stokes | England | 4 | 8 | 3.51 | 29.14 | 49.86 | | 12 | Adil Rashid | England | 5 | 8 | 3.55 | 30.90 | 52.20 | | 13 | Mohammed Shami | India | 5 | 9 | 3.60 | 38.88 | 64.75 | | 14 | Hanuma Vihari | India | 1 | 2 | 3.62 | 12.67 | 21.00 | | 15 | Hardik Pandya | India | 4 | 6 | 3.85 | 24.70 | 38.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
I must have missed this. Heat wave in England is considered consecutive days pushing 30 degrees. In Qld I consider this a warm winter. Somehow I don't think those temps would have benefited India.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI must have missed this. Heat wave in England is considered consecutive days pushing 30 degrees. In Qld I consider this a warm winter. Somehow I don't think those temps would have benefited India. Not according to my Brummie mate. Temps were in the mid to late 30s most days.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI must have missed this. Heat wave in England is considered consecutive days pushing 30 degrees. In Qld I consider this a warm winter. Somehow I don't think those temps would have benefited India. It's a myth... Kohli can bat well -easily the best of Indian and England combined in swing conditions... He nailed it... ball was hoooping around corners... he still found the middle... Kohli is a serious talent - you can only deny it for so long before you like a fool...
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI must have missed this. Heat wave in England is considered consecutive days pushing 30 degrees. In Qld I consider this a warm winter. Somehow I don't think those temps would have benefited India. It's a myth... Kohli can bat well -easily the best of Indian and England combined in swing conditions... He nailed it... ball was hoooping around corners... he still found the middle... Kohli is a serious talent - you can only deny it for so long before you like a fool... I can't believe anyone would contend that Kohli is anything but a great batter ATM.
|
|
|
|
|
Lastbroadcast
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Decentric, I'm surprised you didn't see Sangakkara's greatest ever test innings, considering he played it in Hobart. Check out some of this hitting (especially from the 6min mark onwards): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aO3BLDDIFA
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
I could have been away.
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xLast night I looked up Nathan Lyon's figures to discover he is a great! He has something like 333 wickets in 81 Tests! He is 25th in ranking number of Test wickets of all bowlers to play international cricket. GOAT is 4th highest Aussie wicket taker after Warne, McGrath and Lillee, yet he has had such a low profile and media interest in comparison. Lyon is the 7th top spinner of all time for all cricket nations. GOAT isn't the only one. tWhen I looked a stats, Sangakarra is in the top 10 batters of all time in run aggregates. He accumulated over 10 000 runs, with possibly the highest average of 58. Yet I've barely heard of him. Why? He has hardly played Test cricket in Australia. Ditto his spinning teammate, Herath. Until the last series against Sri Lanka , I'd barely heard of him. Why? Herath is ahead of Lyon in international wicket taking ranks. It may have been Baggers today, but he mentioned BJ Watling is also a pretty decent wicketkeeper/batter, boasting a batting average of 38. He is virtually unknown in Australia. From what I've seen in New Zealand it is harder to score runs than here. Players like Richard Hadlee and Martin Crowe had huge profiles in Australia, but few Kiwi players have since. Yet Kane Williamson is currently ranked third in the world as a batter. Relatively, he has had a low profile too. Thoughts? Hmmmm. I am not sure how you can be a serious cricket follower and not know quite a bit all of the names mentioned.
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
Over the last 10 years media has become dictated by trends on social media, eg when you go to a cricket site esp in Australia, they have a list of most searched players. With 35% of Australians, of course the most popular "trends" will be NSW based. Afterall no average NSW person would be interested in a state game between SA and Tas. Just like an average Qlder, Tasmanian, South Australian is not interested in NSW, but they have smaller population so they don't make a mark on these trends. The media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide.
eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him.
But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer.
The only time overseas players get any attention in Australia is when they tour, and unless people have Fox and an interest in two overseas teams competing they have no idea how truly talented players like Kohli, Sangakkara, Williamson etc are, unless they are continually breaking records. An Australian tour is once every 4 years and is a blip on the radar for most of these players, and makes minimal impact on their overall performances. It does piss me off when people say "yeah, but how did they go in Australia" because that just promotes arrogance which I can assure you is not a typical Australian trait.
When you look at Kohli his average is 65 in India and 58 in Australia. Not much of a discrepancy.
When you look at Steve Smith his average is 60 in India and 77 in Australia, more of a discrepancy but still excellent
But look at the previous high profile David Warner. 60 average in Australia, 24 in India. His overall away average is 37. But try telling the average cricket follower in Australia he is garbage, David would not make an India side because half their games are played in India. But Indian supporters still respect Warner and pay him big bucks to play there. Australians don't reciprocate this respect to overseas talent.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide.
Selectors couldn't care less about the media, particularly the ones with no professional cricketing background. It depends on how the players selected perform in Tests that concerns selectors.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOver the last 10 years media has become dictated by trends on social media, eg when you go to a cricket site esp in Australia, they have a list of most searched players. With 35% of Australians, of course the most popular "trends" will be NSW based. Afterall no average NSW person would be interested in a state game between SA and Tas. Just like an average Qlder, Tasmanian, South Australian is not interested in NSW, but they have smaller population so they don't make a mark on these trends. The media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. I'm very interested in games between other states than my own, Tasmania, when it comes to performances of players who could be in contention for Aussie selection. This is exemplified currently in Matt Renshaw, Jhye Richardson, Peter Carey, Kurtis Patterson and Glen Maxwell's performances.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xOver the last 10 years media has become dictated by trends on social media, eg when you go to a cricket site esp in Australia, they have a list of most searched players. With 35% of Australians, of course the most popular "trends" will be NSW based. Afterall no average NSW person would be interested in a state game between SA and Tas. Just like an average Qlder, Tasmanian, South Australian is not interested in NSW, but they have smaller population so they don't make a mark on these trends. The media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. I'm very interested in games between other states than my own, Tasmania, when it comes to performances of players who could be in contention for Aussie selection. This is exemplified currently in Matt Renshaw, Jhye Richardson, Peter Carey, Kurtis Patterson and Glen Maxwell's performances. Mike is doing his very best to get another member to follow his anti NSW bias trends. Ignore him DC. I too watch other states for the same reasons DC. . In fact I am almost fanatical. That is why I sometimes have a crashed computer because I am trying to watch three live streams at once.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x
The only time overseas players get any attention in Australia is when they tour, and unless people have Fox and an interest in two overseas teams competing they have no idea how truly talented players like Kohli, Sangakkara, Williamson etc are, unless they are continually breaking records. An Australian tour is once every 4 years and is a blip on the radar for most of these players, and makes minimal impact on their overall performances. It does piss me off when people say "yeah, but how did they go in Australia" because that just promotes arrogance which I can assure you is not a typical Australian trait.
You've hit the nail on the head, Mike. Aussie pitches are different to most in the rest of the world too.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide.
eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him.
But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer.
I've led this. Just over a year ago he was out most lethal bowler - a force of nature. He has always had a bright future, bowling at express pace from 18 years of age. I'm so disappointed in his progress. This is because after an Asian tour last year he gave us the most lethal attack in world cricket - when he replaced the injured Starc and Hazlewood as the spearhead. Where he is now, is very disappointing. It is no coincidence he has taken few wickets in this series. I surmise he has lost an average of 7 kph of pace per ball. The things that worked so well at an average speed of 143kph don't work as well at 136 kph. He was as fast as Starc. He is now similar speed as Hazlewood, who is more effective at lower speeds. Many commentators who look favourably at Paddy's last two Tests, may net be looking at the speed gun. He is too inexperienced to be a successful reduced pace bowler at this early stage of his his career, like Hadlee, Lillee, McDermott, Courtney Walsh and Steyn, have been late in their careers at reduced speed. Have Jimmy Anderson and Broad lost pace too? if Cummins is a 136 kph bowler, then other Aussies can bowl similarly with a more economical action and more endurance - Boland, Tremain, Bird, Gabe Bell, Michael Neser. If we want raw pace, Richardson and Meredith are bowling faster in the Shield. Stanlake is also bowling very fast, but has no endurance.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide.
eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him.
But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer.
I've led this. Just over a year ago he was out most lethal bowler - a force of nature. He has always had a bright future, bowling at express pace from 18 years of age. I'm so disappointed in his progress. This is because after an Asian tour last year he gave us the most lethal attack in world cricket - when he replaced the injured Starc and Hazlewood as the spearhead. Where he is now, is very disappointing. It is no coincidence he has taken few wickets in this series. I surmise he has lost an average of 7 kph of pace per ball. The things that worked so well at an average speed of 143kph don't work as well at 136 kph. He was as fast as Starc. He is now similar speed as Hazlewood, who is more effective at lower speeds. Many commentators who look favourably at Paddy's last two Tests, may net be looking at the speed gun. He is too inexperienced to be a successful reduced pace bowler at this early stage of his his career, like Hadlee, Lillee, McDermott, Courtney Walsh and Steyn, have been late in their careers at reduced speed. Have Jimmy Anderson and Broad lost pace too? if Cummins is a 136 kph bowler, then other Aussies can bowl similarly with a more economical action and more endurance - Boland, Tremain, Bird, Gabe Bell, Michael Neser. If we want raw pace, Richardson and Meredith are bowling faster in the Shield. Stanlake is also bowling very fast, but has no endurance. DC We saw a touch of Cummo's old pace wrapping up the Test match.. Looked to me like that express demon like intimidation we have seen in past years.. Not sure what the speed gun showed.. I will say low 140s as a short ball..That translates to hi 140s/150 with a fuller ball. Needs to produce it more if he wants to stay a member of this attack.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThe media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide.
eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him.
But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer.
I've led this. Just over a year ago he was out most lethal bowler - a force of nature. He has always had a bright future, bowling at express pace from 18 years of age. I'm so disappointed in his progress. This is because after an Asian tour last year he gave us the most lethal attack in world cricket - when he replaced the injured Starc and Hazlewood as the spearhead. Where he is now, is very disappointing. It is no coincidence he has taken few wickets in this series. I surmise he has lost an average of 7 kph of pace per ball. The things that worked so well at an average speed of 143kph don't work as well at 136 kph. He was as fast as Starc. He is now similar speed as Hazlewood, who is more effective at lower speeds. Many commentators who look favourably at Paddy's last two Tests, may net be looking at the speed gun. He is too inexperienced to be a successful reduced pace bowler at this early stage of his his career, like Hadlee, Lillee, McDermott, Courtney Walsh and Steyn, have been late in their careers at reduced speed. Have Jimmy Anderson and Broad lost pace too? if Cummins is a 136 kph bowler, then other Aussies can bowl similarly with a more economical action and more endurance - Boland, Tremain, Bird, Gabe Bell, Michael Neser. If we want raw pace, Richardson and Meredith are bowling faster in the Shield. Stanlake is also bowling very fast, but has no endurance. DC We saw a touch of Cummo's old pace wrapping up the Test match.. Looked to me like that express demon like intimidation we have seen in past years.. Not sure what the speed gun showed.. I will say late 140s. Needs to produce it more if he wants to stay a member of this attack. I didn't see him bowl a ball above 143kph, but there were a few short balls that climbed off the pitch 139-142 kph in Perth. I watched a lot of the Test too. Even in the first Test against England last year he was constantly bowling short balls 140 kph and over. In Asia last year he was bowling balls that climbed off the pitch 145 kph plus! It is no coincidence his wicket taking has diminished against India.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThe media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide.
eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him.
But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer.
I've led this. Just over a year ago he was out most lethal bowler - a force of nature. He has always had a bright future, bowling at express pace from 18 years of age. I'm so disappointed in his progress. This is because after an Asian tour last year he gave us the most lethal attack in world cricket - when he replaced the injured Starc and Hazlewood as the spearhead. Where he is now, is very disappointing. It is no coincidence he has taken few wickets in this series. I surmise he has lost an average of 7 kph of pace per ball. The things that worked so well at an average speed of 143kph don't work as well at 136 kph. He was as fast as Starc. He is now similar speed as Hazlewood, who is more effective at lower speeds. Many commentators who look favourably at Paddy's last two Tests, may net be looking at the speed gun. He is too inexperienced to be a successful reduced pace bowler at this early stage of his his career, like Hadlee, Lillee, McDermott, Courtney Walsh and Steyn, have been late in their careers at reduced speed. Have Jimmy Anderson and Broad lost pace too? if Cummins is a 136 kph bowler, then other Aussies can bowl similarly with a more economical action and more endurance - Boland, Tremain, Bird, Gabe Bell, Michael Neser. If we want raw pace, Richardson and Meredith are bowling faster in the Shield. Stanlake is also bowling very fast, but has no endurance. DC We saw a touch of Cummo's old pace wrapping up the Test match.. Looked to me like that express demon like intimidation we have seen in past years.. Not sure what the speed gun showed.. I will say late 140s. Needs to produce it more if he wants to stay a member of this attack. I didn't see him bowl a ball above 143kph, but there were a few short balls that climbed off the pitch 139-142 kph in Perth. I watched a lot of the Test too. Even in the first Test against England last year he was constantly bowling short balls 140 kph and over. In Asia last year he was bowling balls that climbed off the pitch 145 kph plus! It is no coincidence his wicket taking has diminished against India. I changed that post.. altered the speeds.. those two thunderbolts that cleaned up India were clocked at 141.. translated to a fuller ball that would be around 150. My point being that Cummins can still crank it up to express.. but seldom does. He is bowling well within himself.. Looks to be saving his body. I am betting this is on orders from CA.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide.
eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him.
But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer.
I've led this. Just over a year ago he was out most lethal bowler - a force of nature. He has always had a bright future, bowling at express pace from 18 years of age. I'm so disappointed in his progress. This is because after an Asian tour last year he gave us the most lethal attack in world cricket - when he replaced the injured Starc and Hazlewood as the spearhead. Where he is now, is very disappointing. It is no coincidence he has taken few wickets in this series. I surmise he has lost an average of 7 kph of pace per ball. The things that worked so well at an average speed of 143kph don't work as well at 136 kph. He was as fast as Starc. He is now similar speed as Hazlewood, who is more effective at lower speeds. Many commentators who look favourably at Paddy's last two Tests, may net be looking at the speed gun. He is too inexperienced to be a successful reduced pace bowler at this early stage of his his career, like Hadlee, Lillee, McDermott, Courtney Walsh and Steyn, have been late in their careers at reduced speed. Have Jimmy Anderson and Broad lost pace too? if Cummins is a 136 kph bowler, then other Aussies can bowl similarly with a more economical action and more endurance - Boland, Tremain, Bird, Gabe Bell, Michael Neser. If we want raw pace, Richardson and Meredith are bowling faster in the Shield. Stanlake is also bowling very fast, but has no endurance. Steyn has not really reduced speed at all.... I watched video of him bowling 139km yesterday from ten years ago... He was mid 140's in this tour of Aus... Steyn is very very very fit... I'd back him to wind up 150 clicks tomorrow if asked to do so... Jimmy has not lost pace, Broad has in a big way, though. In a real big way... Hadlee and McGrath dropped their pace to be better bowlers... I doubt this is the case with the majority of pace losses...
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhen you look at Kohli his average is 65 in India and 58 in Australia. Not much of a discrepancy. When you look at Steve Smith his average is 60 in India and 77 in Australia, more of a discrepancy but still excellent But look at the previous high profile David Warner. 60 average in Australia, 24 in India. His overall away average is 37. But try telling the average cricket follower in Australia he is garbage, David would not make an India side because half their games are played in India. But Indian supporters still respect Warner and pay him big bucks to play there. Australians don't reciprocate this respect to overseas talent. Very well said and argued, Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWhen you look at Kohli his average is 65 in India and 58 in Australia. Not much of a discrepancy. When you look at Steve Smith his average is 60 in India and 77 in Australia, more of a discrepancy but still excellent But look at the previous high profile David Warner. 60 average in Australia, 24 in India. His overall away average is 37. But try telling the average cricket follower in Australia he is garbage, David would not make an India side because half their games are played in India. But Indian supporters still respect Warner and pay him big bucks to play there. Australians don't reciprocate this respect to overseas talent. Very well said and argued, Mike. We agree on this Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhen you look at Kohli his average is 65 in India and 58 in Australia. Not much of a discrepancy. When you look at Steve Smith his average is 60 in India and 77 in Australia, more of a discrepancy but still excellent But look at the previous high profile David Warner. 60 average in Australia, 24 in India. His overall away average is 37. But try telling the average cricket follower in Australia he is garbage, David would not make an India side because half their games are played in India. B ut Indian supporters still respect Warner and pay him big bucks to play there. Australians don't reciprocate this respect to overseas talent. Warner has been an absolute gun in the IPL... Gayle gets all the media, but its really been Warner, KW, ABdV and Kohli that dominate the IPL in recent years... Rohit does very well most years too... Raina is an ace... You'll see Rayudu in the ODI's...
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOver the last 10 years media has become dictated by trends on social media, eg when you go to a cricket site esp in Australia, they have a list of most searched players. With 35% of Australians, of course the most popular "trends" will be NSW based. Afterall no average NSW person would be interested in a state game between SA and Tas. Just like an average Qlder, Tasmanian, South Australian is not interested in NSW, but they have smaller population so they don't make a mark on these trends. The media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide. eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him. But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer. The only time overseas players get any attention in Australia is when they tour, and unless people have Fox and an interest in two overseas teams competing they have no idea how truly talented players like Kohli, Sangakkara, Williamson etc are, unless they are continually breaking records. An Australian tour is once every 4 years and is a blip on the radar for most of these players, and makes minimal impact on their overall performances. It does *** me off when people say "yeah, but how did they go in Australia" because that just promotes arrogance which I can assure you is not a typical Australian trait. When you look at Kohli his average is 65 in India and 58 in Australia. Not much of a discrepancy. When you look at Steve Smith his average is 60 in India and 77 in Australia, more of a discrepancy but still excellent But look at the previous high profile David Warner. 60 average in Australia, 24 in India. His overall away average is 37. But try telling the average cricket follower in Australia he is garbage, David would not make an India side because half their games are played in India. But Indian supporters still respect Warner and pay him big bucks to play there. Australians don't reciprocate this respect to overseas talent. Warner does have big descrepency home and way. However there is an oddity, he averages 63.33 against South Africa in South Africa but only 40.18 against South African in Australia. Make of that whatever you like. He also has a surprisingly terrible record in the West Indies averaging only 26.9 when they are a very weak team.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xOver the last 10 years media has become dictated by trends on social media, eg when you go to a cricket site esp in Australia, they have a list of most searched players. With 35% of Australians, of course the most popular "trends" will be NSW based. Afterall no average NSW person would be interested in a state game between SA and Tas. Just like an average Qlder, Tasmanian, South Australian is not interested in NSW, but they have smaller population so they don't make a mark on these trends. The media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide. eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him. But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer. The only time overseas players get any attention in Australia is when they tour, and unless people have Fox and an interest in two overseas teams competing they have no idea how truly talented players like Kohli, Sangakkara, Williamson etc are, unless they are continually breaking records. An Australian tour is once every 4 years and is a blip on the radar for most of these players, and makes minimal impact on their overall performances. It does *** me off when people say "yeah, but how did they go in Australia" because that just promotes arrogance which I can assure you is not a typical Australian trait. When you look at Kohli his average is 65 in India and 58 in Australia. Not much of a discrepancy. When you look at Steve Smith his average is 60 in India and 77 in Australia, more of a discrepancy but still excellent But look at the previous high profile David Warner. 60 average in Australia, 24 in India. His overall away average is 37. But try telling the average cricket follower in Australia he is garbage, David would not make an India side because half their games are played in India. But Indian supporters still respect Warner and pay him big bucks to play there. Australians don't reciprocate this respect to overseas talent. Warner does have big descrepency home and way. However there is an oddity, he averages 63.33 against South Africa in South Africa but only 40.18 against South African in Australia. Make of that whatever you like. He also has a surprisingly terrible record in the West Indies averaging only 26.9 when they are a very weak team. Grassy, moving decks? Warner hates the moving ball.
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xOver the last 10 years media has become dictated by trends on social media, eg when you go to a cricket site esp in Australia, they have a list of most searched players. With 35% of Australians, of course the most popular "trends" will be NSW based. Afterall no average NSW person would be interested in a state game between SA and Tas. Just like an average Qlder, Tasmanian, South Australian is not interested in NSW, but they have smaller population so they don't make a mark on these trends. The media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide. eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him. But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer. The only time overseas players get any attention in Australia is when they tour, and unless people have Fox and an interest in two overseas teams competing they have no idea how truly talented players like Kohli, Sangakkara, Williamson etc are, unless they are continually breaking records. An Australian tour is once every 4 years and is a blip on the radar for most of these players, and makes minimal impact on their overall performances. It does *** me off when people say "yeah, but how did they go in Australia" because that just promotes arrogance which I can assure you is not a typical Australian trait. When you look at Kohli his average is 65 in India and 58 in Australia. Not much of a discrepancy. When you look at Steve Smith his average is 60 in India and 77 in Australia, more of a discrepancy but still excellent But look at the previous high profile David Warner. 60 average in Australia, 24 in India. His overall away average is 37. But try telling the average cricket follower in Australia he is garbage, David would not make an India side because half their games are played in India. But Indian supporters still respect Warner and pay him big bucks to play there. Australians don't reciprocate this respect to overseas talent. Warner does have big descrepency home and way. However there is an oddity, he averages 63.33 against South Africa in South Africa but only 40.18 against South African in Australia. Make of that whatever you like. He also has a surprisingly terrible record in the West Indies averaging only 26.9 when they are a very weak team. Grassy, moving decks? Warner hates the moving ball. Probably.
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xOver the last 10 years media has become dictated by trends on social media, eg when you go to a cricket site esp in Australia, they have a list of most searched players. With 35% of Australians, of course the most popular "trends" will be NSW based. Afterall no average NSW person would be interested in a state game between SA and Tas. Just like an average Qlder, Tasmanian, South Australian is not interested in NSW, but they have smaller population so they don't make a mark on these trends. The media jump on these trends and promote players, it is not performance based anymore. Of course Selectors read the media, and are more likely to promote these individuals because to go against the media is committing suicide. eg Cummins, people on this site are already questioning that his best days are behind him. But if you look at his FC career without tests, it reads 12 matches 40/1095 av 27.4 SR 56. Personally I feel we are just seeing the balancing out of his overall stats the more games he plays. My question is how does a player with those comparatively poor FC stats compared to others in shield get promoted in the first place. But now he is "the face" of cricket getting the advertising roles etc. It gets him a high profile but it doesn't make him a great cricketer. The only time overseas players get any attention in Australia is when they tour, and unless people have Fox and an interest in two overseas teams competing they have no idea how truly talented players like Kohli, Sangakkara, Williamson etc are, unless they are continually breaking records. An Australian tour is once every 4 years and is a blip on the radar for most of these players, and makes minimal impact on their overall performances. It does *** me off when people say "yeah, but how did they go in Australia" because that just promotes arrogance which I can assure you is not a typical Australian trait. When you look at Kohli his average is 65 in India and 58 in Australia. Not much of a discrepancy. When you look at Steve Smith his average is 60 in India and 77 in Australia, more of a discrepancy but still excellent But look at the previous high profile David Warner. 60 average in Australia, 24 in India. His overall away average is 37. But try telling the average cricket follower in Australia he is garbage, David would not make an India side because half their games are played in India. But Indian supporters still respect Warner and pay him big bucks to play there. Australians don't reciprocate this respect to overseas talent. Warner does have big descrepency home and way. However there is an oddity, he averages 63.33 against South Africa in South Africa but only 40.18 against South African in Australia. Make of that whatever you like. He also has a surprisingly terrible record in the West Indies averaging only 26.9 when they are a very weak team. That is an interesting anomaly.
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
You have to remember that people on these forums are not "average" cricket followers. I would say they are well and truly above average, so yes you may follow shield cricket, even going to home games, crashing computers etc, but the average cricket follower wouldn't even know who won the shield. You may say selectors are more interested in how players perform in tests, but how does a player first get selected to play their first test. Selectors don't go to every single game at shield level it is impossible for them to do so, so they rely on media outlets to update them. Where are these outlets?
The Australian Headquarters 2 Holt street, Surry Hills, New South Wales, Australia
The Daily Telegraph (Sydney, NSW)
Sydney Morning Herald (NSW)
These are the 3 biggest selling newspapers
Fox Sports (Australia) Artarmon, New South Wales
Seven Network Headquarters Sydney
Nine Network Headquarters Sydney
So who do they promote the most? Does the Courier Mail in Qld or The Western Australian with 130K readers really make a difference, The Age only has 80K, The Mercury only 37K.
Sydney dominates the media and they promote NSW, even here in Brisbane we get the televised Sydney News which does show all the NSW games with a little blip about other games then we get the Qld News. Probably the same in the other states I am assuming. Do Sydney get the Queensland News? Of course not. So NSW gets promoted nationally, with other states only promoted locally. Morning shows "Today" (Sydney) "Sunrise" (Sydney) "The Morning Show" (Sydney). Starting to see a pattern.
This is not me being anti-NSW as Baggers likes to say, it is highlighting how the media is a bias medium and it is not to be quoted as factual, because it extremely subjective. So the fortunate players to receive promotion not at local level but on a national level are the NSW players. It is best to watch yourselves and form an honest opinion of what you see as an individual. The "average " cricket follower regurgitates what they have seen or read in the media.
To me the media are supposed to be honest in their reporting and give a fair go to all. Using a recent example Joe Burns was playing for an opening position in the Australian team. Even Baggers will admit it was the dodgiest decision all season when he was given out. The media made no mention of this. No all that mattered to the media was promoting Starc, Hazlewood and Cummins return. This decision, if made known by the media, may have seen Burns in the side, his form and history would be deserving of that selection, and Burns may have got a lucrative million dollar contract. That decision ultimately cost Joe Burns a million dollars. Now if it was a NSW player in that position, how do you think they would have handled it? How many replays of that decision would have been all over the news.
But this is a point I make on a local level to show how at international level Australian don't know the real International cricketer because they rarely report International games. When Australian media make someone out to be the villain, this year it happens to be Kholi, but there have been many others such as Hadlee, Graham Smith was another, they gloss over how truly talented these players are. They are more interested in selling and villains sell.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
37 away average these days is handy and hardly rubbish
have a look at technician mark waughs average in india!
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x37 away average these days is handy and hardly rubbish have a look at technician mark waughs average in india! What was M Waugh's average in India?
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x37 away average these days is handy and hardly rubbish have a look at technician mark waughs average in india! What was M Waugh's average in India? around 10 if I recall correctly ESPN cricinfo have changed their site though to make getting stats on players harder for some reason
|
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x37 away average these days is handy and hardly rubbish have a look at technician mark waughs average in india! What was M Waugh's average in India? around 10 if I recall correctly ESPN cricinfo have changed their site though to make getting stats on players harder for some reason Wow! A failure! I've found Cricinfo the same - more difficult to navigate than it is used to be.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x37 away average these days is handy and hardly rubbish have a look at technician mark waughs average in india! What was M Waugh's average in India? around 10 if I recall correctly ESPN cricinfo have changed their site though to make getting stats on players harder for some reason Wow! A failure! I've found Cricinfo the same - more difficult to navigate than it is used to be. STATSGURU (Cricinfo stats) fellars.
|
|
|
|