|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMassive problem is the lack of shield cricket for our batsmen (well, everyone!). Something needs to change.A solution, which might sound stupid at first because people are so precious about changing the fabric of the sport....Two (or even one) new shield teams! CA XI (or NT even playing out of Alice Springs/Darwin if you wanna draw a longer bow) and ACT. Long form cricket needs to evolve, not just short form. Each team plays home and away, that's 14 fixtures, plus all the fixtures created for the new teams means more opportunities for more players. I know it ain't as simple as that, and it's costly cause no-one watchesthe shield but I seriously think something like that should be looked at if they want long form cricket to improve. The sport has changed now. I watch the Shield - live. Some good points made, Jay Ess. You could probably add them to General Cricket Issues thread. A lot has been discussed in the media about this ridiculously long three month break for Aussie FC cricketers in the middle of the season. They can only play grade cricket or BBL. It is ridiculous!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JayEss
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Massive problem is the lack of shield cricket for our batsmen (well, everyone!). Something needs to change.
A solution, which might sound stupid at first because people are so precious about changing the fabric of the sport....
Two (or even one) new shield teams! CA XI (or NT even playing out of Alice Springs/Darwin if you wanna draw a longer bow) and ACT. Long form cricket needs to evolve, not just short form. Each team plays home and away, that's 14 fixtures, plus all the fixtures created for the new teams means more opportunities for more players. I know it ain't as simple as that, and it's costly cause no-one watches
the shield but I seriously think something like that should be looked at if they want long form cricket to improve. The sport has changed now.
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Paine complaining about the pitch is very bad form
Kohli never talks about pitches and gets annoyed if asked.
Both teams had to play on it and the better team won. Only Cummins in both second innings made in anyway close to being competitive.
India have the better batsmen, the better fast bowlers and the better spin options, that is why they are winning. They would beat us in all conditions far more than we would beat them.
I think historically one of the great things about Australian tests is the different grounds have their own character, leave it alone Paine.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPerhaps Labuschagne has been selected to be the second spinner and to play instead of one of the fast bowlers. But that still leaves us with a batting lineup that is too weak to understand. The three players who can come into the side are, the out of form Handscomb, Labuschagne and the aging Peter Siddle. The best I can come up with out of this mess Harris Khawaja Paine S. Marsh Head Finch Cummins Labuschagne M. Marsh Starc Lyon Paine at 3 is a desperate move but he fights hard and is getting some runs almost every innings. Khawaja has to remain at #3. Has Labu opened? We need a r/h in the top 3. Paine should promote himself, Cummins and demote Finch. Harris Labu Khawaja Paine Marsh Head Cummins Finch Starc Lyon Hazlewood.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Not what we wanted to hear. Australia are expecting another dry and slow pitch in Sydney this week and have added leg-spinning allrounder Marnus Labuschagne to their squad. India could also have a full complement of spin options to choose from in Sydney, with Ravichandran Ashwin close to full fitness having missed the past two Tests with a side problem. While acknowledging India had outplayed his side in Melbourne, Paine said he was disappointed that the much-maligned MCG pitch had not favoured the home side's bowling attack. "We're hearing it's probably going to be a little bit dry (at the SCG) … I'm sure India will be really looking forward to it," Paine told Macquarie Radio.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xMy next question is, why is Langer not sorting this out. All I hear bandied around by the commentators, is that he stands by his team & has their backs - great, but what if your team is not performing. Look at our selections for 12 & 13, WI would always have 2 good fielders and on hot days in Perth rotate their players into the rooms for a rest. Caused a bit of controversy in it's day but what smart management. Who did we bring on Siddle!! Langer seems to be slipping under the radar & I think more questions need t be asked about him. some fight has been put into a very average team by him perhaps but he should be well away from selection. Perhaps some tactical changes like you suggest could help too some fight has been put into a very average team by him perhaps but he should be well away from selection. Perhaps some tactical changes like you suggest could help too. Agree. I am also against the coach being a selector. In cricket, is our coach to close to the players to make the hard decisions who should be in & out. As far as I am aware in the AFL, the coach coaches the coaches and whilst familiar with the players is a step away from them working on strategies, team selection to suit opposition, conditions etc. Should we have a bigger squad coming into a test series that the team is selected from based on performance & such. I guess what I m trying to say, is do we look at the way we coach to improve same.. News on the Australian contracts. Pat Cummins is calling for multi-year contracts, especially for the bowlers (who just happen to be his fellow NSW players) Think about that, out injured for a year or two, CA have to pay them out, meanwhile another misses out, unless CA is prepared to part with additional funds. Or worse still bowlers out of form will continued to be selected because CA has a multi-year contract. Talk about lining your pockets. I don't mind Cummins suggesting it, based on his importance to the team, but taking his fellow bowlers with him. Remember when Cummins was out injured he still had his yearly contract with CA renewed I believe every year. More NSW bias Mike. that is not what the Tele is reporting. What the matter mate. No Qld bowlers putting their hands up to replace our out of formers? Steketee is a QLD bowler the selectors should be watching, he is having a very good season and at 24 is still quite young. I would not have him ahead of the Victorians or Jhye Richardson but worth watching like the Tasmanian bowlers. Basically we have, The current attack, Cummins, Starc, Hazlewood The next contenders, Tremain, Boland, Richardson Those to watch Pattinson, Steketee, Meredith, Bell. And then there is the old timer Peter Siddle who I think should not play test cricket again but who know what the selectors are thinking. Siddle is another teacher's pet. Has never reached any great elevation. An honest workhorse I class him as. Usually picked as he does a job holding up one end and has a good work ethic.. Mike gets great satisfaction bashing Hazlewood senseless why not Siddle who is also a seamer. Is it because he does not wear a Two Blue cap?
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xgreat looks like we are making a single change in swapping mitch for labu Yep. CA has chickened out with only the one change. spin all rounder for pace all rounder. How the **** does Finch keep his place?
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Perhaps Labuschagne has been selected to be the second spinner and to play instead of one of the fast bowlers. But that still leaves us with a batting lineup that is too weak to understand.
The three players who can come into the side are, the out of form Handscomb, Labuschagne and the aging Peter Siddle.
The best I can come up with out of this mess
Harris
Khawaja
Paine
S. Marsh
Head
Finch
Cummins
Labuschagne
M. Marsh
Starc
Lyon
Paine at 3 is a desperate move but he fights hard and is getting some runs almost every innings.
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xgreat looks like we are making a single change in swapping mitch for labu The selectors have lost the plot. We will probably lose to Sri Lanka the way things are going The only reasoning I can see behind the selections is that they want to create an environment where the public is desperate to get Warner and Smith back into the side immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI mean there is always an argument that the bowling can be better its just weird to me that the bowling side is under scrutiny here when they are meeting career benchmarks that I would definitely describe as world class. Lyon is the GOAT and our three quicks have career averages well below 30 Mcdermott averaged over 28 Gillespe averaged 26 Brett lee averaged 30.8 Merv Hughes averaged 28 M Johnson averaged 28 I doubt many would dispute any 3 of that trio would make a world class trio yet I'm not sure any combination would beat our current trio. All of them have had bad seasons and good seasons thats perfectly natural compare with career benchmarks for batters. A passable test batter averages 40+ a very good one 45+ and an outstanding one 50+. We have 1 passable test batter in Khawaja. Good selection could have a team full of passable batters rather than the hopeless lot we have (And smith and Warners return make it a decent team that could push for number 1 at some stage) Sure there is an argument to use our impressive bowling depth. But why the focus on our bowlers? +xI'll compare the current mob to previous ashes squads starting in 2010 before this mob was around going back nearly 50 years (as far as ESPNcricinfo will let me go!) average/strike rate (sum divided by 3) of our historical pace trio Hazelwood-Starc-Cummins 26.56/52.97 Hilfenhaus-siddle-johnson 29.06/58.2 lee-mcgrath-clark 25.44/53.3 mcgrath-lee-gillespe 26.19/53.37 mcgrath-gillespe-bichel 26.67/54.76 mcgrath-gillespe-fleming 24.55/53.93 Mcgrath-gillespe-Kasper 26.88/56.63 Angel-Mcgrath-Mcdermott 32.19/61.2 Alderman-reid-hughes 26.72/57.63 Alderman-lawson-hughes 28.70/59.8 Lawson-mcdermott-o'donnel 47.73/91.73 lillee-alderman-lawson 27.196/57.83 Hurst-Hogg-Laughlan 33.34/73 Thompson-Pascoe-Walker 27.17/59.6 So our average is the 4th best (mostly due to mcgrath's long incredible career) and our strike rate is actually our best ever What about trios including Paul Reiffel? didn't find an ashes squad he was in but only looked at the first match with 3 quicks (some matches had four quicks or 2 spinners in which case I'd look at the next test) He was a better bowler than Fleming, Kasporwisz, Angel and Bichel who you did include in trios. Probably quite a few of the earlier bowlers as well. So he should be in there somewhere. He played in both the 1993 and 1997 Ashes series in England. In 1993 he took 19 wickets at under 21. average of 26.96 and strike rate of 61 which puts him arguably weaker than fleming, hazelwood and cummins as well as a lower strike rate than starc
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
great looks like we are making a single change in swapping mitch for labu
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI mean there is always an argument that the bowling can be better its just weird to me that the bowling side is under scrutiny here when they are meeting career benchmarks that I would definitely describe as world class. Lyon is the GOAT and our three quicks have career averages well below 30 Mcdermott averaged over 28 Gillespe averaged 26 Brett lee averaged 30.8 Merv Hughes averaged 28 M Johnson averaged 28 I doubt many would dispute any 3 of that trio would make a world class trio yet I'm not sure any combination would beat our current trio. All of them have had bad seasons and good seasons thats perfectly natural compare with career benchmarks for batters. A passable test batter averages 40+ a very good one 45+ and an outstanding one 50+. We have 1 passable test batter in Khawaja. Good selection could have a team full of passable batters rather than the hopeless lot we have (And smith and Warners return make it a decent team that could push for number 1 at some stage) Sure there is an argument to use our impressive bowling depth. But why the focus on our bowlers? +xI'll compare the current mob to previous ashes squads starting in 2010 before this mob was around going back nearly 50 years (as far as ESPNcricinfo will let me go!) average/strike rate (sum divided by 3) of our historical pace trio Hazelwood-Starc-Cummins 26.56/52.97 Hilfenhaus-siddle-johnson 29.06/58.2 lee-mcgrath-clark 25.44/53.3 mcgrath-lee-gillespe 26.19/53.37 mcgrath-gillespe-bichel 26.67/54.76 mcgrath-gillespe-fleming 24.55/53.93 Mcgrath-gillespe-Kasper 26.88/56.63 Angel-Mcgrath-Mcdermott 32.19/61.2 Alderman-reid-hughes 26.72/57.63 Alderman-lawson-hughes 28.70/59.8 Lawson-mcdermott-o'donnel 47.73/91.73 lillee-alderman-lawson 27.196/57.83 Hurst-Hogg-Laughlan 33.34/73 Thompson-Pascoe-Walker 27.17/59.6 So our average is the 4th best (mostly due to mcgrath's long incredible career) and our strike rate is actually our best ever What about trios including Paul Reiffel? didn't find an ashes squad he was in but only looked at the first match with 3 quicks (some matches had four quicks or 2 spinners in which case I'd look at the next test) He was a better bowler than Fleming, Kasporwisz, Angel and Bichel who you did include in trios. Probably quite a few of the earlier bowlers as well. So he should be in there somewhere. He played in both the 1993 and 1997 Ashes series in England. In 1993 he took 19 wickets at under 21.
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xMy next question is, why is Langer not sorting this out. All I hear bandied around by the commentators, is that he stands by his team & has their backs - great, but what if your team is not performing. Look at our selections for 12 & 13, WI would always have 2 good fielders and on hot days in Perth rotate their players into the rooms for a rest. Caused a bit of controversy in it's day but what smart management. Who did we bring on Siddle!! Langer seems to be slipping under the radar & I think more questions need t be asked about him. some fight has been put into a very average team by him perhaps but he should be well away from selection. Perhaps some tactical changes like you suggest could help too some fight has been put into a very average team by him perhaps but he should be well away from selection. Perhaps some tactical changes like you suggest could help too. Agree. I am also against the coach being a selector. In cricket, is our coach to close to the players to make the hard decisions who should be in & out. As far as I am aware in the AFL, the coach coaches the coaches and whilst familiar with the players is a step away from them working on strategies, team selection to suit opposition, conditions etc. Should we have a bigger squad coming into a test series that the team is selected from based on performance & such. I guess what I m trying to say, is do we look at the way we coach to improve same.. News on the Australian contracts. Pat Cummins is calling for multi-year contracts, especially for the bowlers (who just happen to be his fellow NSW players) Think about that, out injured for a year or two, CA have to pay them out, meanwhile another misses out, unless CA is prepared to part with additional funds. Or worse still bowlers out of form will continued to be selected because CA has a multi-year contract. Talk about lining your pockets. I don't mind Cummins suggesting it, based on his importance to the team, but taking his fellow bowlers with him. Remember when Cummins was out injured he still had his yearly contract with CA renewed I believe every year. More NSW bias Mike. that is not what the Tele is reporting. What the matter mate. No Qld bowlers putting their hands up to replace our out of formers? Steketee is a QLD bowler the selectors should be watching, he is having a very good season and at 24 is still quite young. I would not have him ahead of the Victorians or Jhye Richardson but worth watching like the Tasmanian bowlers. Basically we have, The current attack, Cummins, Starc, Hazlewood The next contenders, Tremain, Boland, Richardson Those to watch Pattinson, Steketee, Meredith, Bell. And then there is the old timer Peter Siddle who I think should not play test cricket again but who know what the selectors are thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI mean there is always an argument that the bowling can be better its just weird to me that the bowling side is under scrutiny here when they are meeting career benchmarks that I would definitely describe as world class. Lyon is the GOAT and our three quicks have career averages well below 30 Mcdermott averaged over 28 Gillespe averaged 26 Brett lee averaged 30.8 Merv Hughes averaged 28 M Johnson averaged 28 I doubt many would dispute any 3 of that trio would make a world class trio yet I'm not sure any combination would beat our current trio. All of them have had bad seasons and good seasons thats perfectly natural compare with career benchmarks for batters. A passable test batter averages 40+ a very good one 45+ and an outstanding one 50+. We have 1 passable test batter in Khawaja. Good selection could have a team full of passable batters rather than the hopeless lot we have (And smith and Warners return make it a decent team that could push for number 1 at some stage) Sure there is an argument to use our impressive bowling depth. But why the focus on our bowlers? +xI'll compare the current mob to previous ashes squads starting in 2010 before this mob was around going back nearly 50 years (as far as ESPNcricinfo will let me go!) average/strike rate (sum divided by 3) of our historical pace trio Hazelwood-Starc-Cummins 26.56/52.97 Hilfenhaus-siddle-johnson 29.06/58.2 lee-mcgrath-clark 25.44/53.3 mcgrath-lee-gillespe 26.19/53.37 mcgrath-gillespe-bichel 26.67/54.76 mcgrath-gillespe-fleming 24.55/53.93 Mcgrath-gillespe-Kasper 26.88/56.63 Angel-Mcgrath-Mcdermott 32.19/61.2 Alderman-reid-hughes 26.72/57.63 Alderman-lawson-hughes 28.70/59.8 Lawson-mcdermott-o'donnel 47.73/91.73 lillee-alderman-lawson 27.196/57.83 Hurst-Hogg-Laughlan 33.34/73 Thompson-Pascoe-Walker 27.17/59.6 So our average is the 4th best (mostly due to mcgrath's long incredible career) and our strike rate is actually our best ever What about trios including Paul Reiffel? didn't find an ashes squad he was in but only looked at the first match with 3 quicks (some matches had four quicks or 2 spinners in which case I'd look at the next test)
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI mean there is always an argument that the bowling can be better its just weird to me that the bowling side is under scrutiny here when they are meeting career benchmarks that I would definitely describe as world class. Lyon is the GOAT and our three quicks have career averages well below 30 Mcdermott averaged over 28 Gillespe averaged 26 Brett lee averaged 30.8 Merv Hughes averaged 28 M Johnson averaged 28 I doubt many would dispute any 3 of that trio would make a world class trio yet I'm not sure any combination would beat our current trio. All of them have had bad seasons and good seasons thats perfectly natural compare with career benchmarks for batters. A passable test batter averages 40+ a very good one 45+ and an outstanding one 50+. We have 1 passable test batter in Khawaja. Good selection could have a team full of passable batters rather than the hopeless lot we have (And smith and Warners return make it a decent team that could push for number 1 at some stage) Sure there is an argument to use our impressive bowling depth. But why the focus on our bowlers? +xI'll compare the current mob to previous ashes squads starting in 2010 before this mob was around going back nearly 50 years (as far as ESPNcricinfo will let me go!) average/strike rate (sum divided by 3) of our historical pace trio Hazelwood-Starc-Cummins 26.56/52.97 Hilfenhaus-siddle-johnson 29.06/58.2 lee-mcgrath-clark 25.44/53.3 mcgrath-lee-gillespe 26.19/53.37 mcgrath-gillespe-bichel 26.67/54.76 mcgrath-gillespe-fleming 24.55/53.93 Mcgrath-gillespe-Kasper 26.88/56.63 Angel-Mcgrath-Mcdermott 32.19/61.2 Alderman-reid-hughes 26.72/57.63 Alderman-lawson-hughes 28.70/59.8 Lawson-mcdermott-o'donnel 47.73/91.73 lillee-alderman-lawson 27.196/57.83 Hurst-Hogg-Laughlan 33.34/73 Thompson-Pascoe-Walker 27.17/59.6 So our average is the 4th best (mostly due to mcgrath's long incredible career) and our strike rate is actually our best ever What about trios including Paul Reiffel?
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. Problem is, go back to list of contracted players, no White, Patterson, Labu or Wade. Is everyone forgetting about Renshaw = contracted player & opener. Only non contracted player in current side is Harris. On the basis, Finch, Handscomb & M. Marsh dropped, Contracted test batters; Head, Khawaja, S. Marsh & Renshaw. Contracted test all rounders; Agar & Maxwell Contracted test bowlers; Cummins, Hazlewood, Lyon, J Richardson, Starc. Contracted test keepers; Paine & Carey. Are they going to bring in non contracted players, when they can make wholesale changes to play Sri lanka, to blood young players looking ahead to the Ashes' and this way they don't loose too much face. It will be on their mind not loosing at the SCG, but can they win from the above list? Cricket Australia need to look to the future and if they have to blow a few million, so be it. If I was Burns, personally, I would tell CA to "Show Me the Money" before I would don the baggy green. They've already screwed him over 3 times, only 1 CA contract in that time. He just signed a contract in England to play off season as has Maxwell. It shows who wants to wear the baggy green, so CA show them the money. I've been mislead by CA contract, just found out CA pay Cummins $2 million plus match fees. surely throw a few bob to Burns, Patterson, Lehmann, potential stars of the future. Off to watch Jerry MacGuire now. Yes "Show Me The Moneeeeeeeeeeeeey!" You're kidding right? The Aus state contracts are worth more than NZC, SAC, BCB and prolly PCB and WICB intl ones.... Your players at State and above are incredibly well paid...
|
|
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. If not mistaken Bumrah only opened bowling with second new ball. Ishant opened the most. (I stand corrected) I remember thinking Bumrah as their fastest bowler should be opening. Or has the Sydney heatwave got to me? Surely who should take the new ball is the person is the uses the new ball best... nothing to do with pace...
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. I'g go with that side, but White you have to use common sense he is too old, but then again Smith is back in 3 tests. Jake Lehmann instead of White is another that could go 4/5 with Patterson. I like the idea of Burns and Harris fighting it out for the opening position with Warner's return, may the best man win. I'll go Labuschagne for Sydney only (if does well batting give him Sri Lanka), but Maxwell otherwise. What was I thinking Baggers you got rid of Head our leading run scorer of the series. Get rid of Khawaja as well then. If Patterson comes in he comes in at 4 or 6 or Jake Lehmann but being Sydney Patterson I did because he has a loose technique. So not long term. Patterson is the better technician over both he and Lehmann. The other consideration is how do they play spin. Some are tipping this will be a spinning wicket. Bloody hope not as that plays into India's hands. Patterson is so so against spin.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. Problem is, go back to list of contracted players, no White, Patterson, Labu or Wade. Is everyone forgetting about Renshaw = contracted player & opener. Only non contracted player in current side is Harris. On the basis, Finch, Handscomb & M. Marsh dropped, Contracted test batters; Head, Khawaja, S. Marsh & Renshaw. Contracted test all rounders; Agar & Maxwell Contracted test bowlers; Cummins, Hazlewood, Lyon, J Richardson, Starc. Contracted test keepers; Paine & Carey. Are they going to bring in non contracted players, when they can make wholesale changes to play Sri lanka, to blood young players looking ahead to the Ashes' and this way they don't loose too much face. It will be on their mind not loosing at the SCG, but can they win from the above list? Do they have the guts to make wholesale changes, blood youngsters. I said the same. The contracted batsmen have not won us this series. In fact they lost it for us. Contracts are only for 12 months. So they are covered with only a matter of delisting the duds if they want to make changes outside the contracted list. I think the ACA is trying to get long term contracts.. but CA has not budged as yet. Harris and Tremain are uncontracted. Time to boot Siddle.
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. Problem is, go back to list of contracted players, no White, Patterson, Labu or Wade. Is everyone forgetting about Renshaw = contracted player & opener. Only non contracted player in current side is Harris. On the basis, Finch, Handscomb & M. Marsh dropped, Contracted test batters; Head, Khawaja, S. Marsh & Renshaw. Contracted test all rounders; Agar & Maxwell Contracted test bowlers; Cummins, Hazlewood, Lyon, J Richardson, Starc. Contracted test keepers; Paine & Carey. Are they going to bring in non contracted players, when they can make wholesale changes to play Sri lanka, to blood young players looking ahead to the Ashes' and this way they don't loose too much face. It will be on their mind not loosing at the SCG, but can they win from the above list? Cricket Australia need to look to the future and if they have to blow a few million, so be it. If I was Burns, personally, I would tell CA to "Show Me the Money" before I would don the baggy green. They've already screwed him over 3 times, only 1 CA contract in that time. He just signed a contract in England to play off season as has Maxwell. It shows who wants to wear the baggy green, so CA show them the money. I've been mislead by CA contract, just found out CA pay Cummins $2 million plus match fees. surely throw a few bob to Burns, Patterson, Lehmann, potential stars of the future. Off to watch Jerry MacGuire now. Yes "Show Me The Moneeeeeeeeeeeeey!"
|
|
|
|
|
jaszyjim
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 224,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. Problem is, go back to list of contracted players, no White, Patterson, Labu or Wade. Is everyone forgetting about Renshaw = contracted player & opener. Only non contracted player in current side is Harris. On the basis, Finch, Handscomb & M. Marsh dropped, Contracted test batters; Head, Khawaja, S. Marsh & Renshaw. Contracted test all rounders; Agar & Maxwell Contracted test bowlers; Cummins, Hazlewood, Lyon, J Richardson, Starc. Contracted test keepers; Paine & Carey. Are they going to bring in non contracted players, when they can make wholesale changes to play Sri lanka, to blood young players looking ahead to the Ashes' and this way they don't loose too much face. It will be on their mind not loosing at the SCG, but can they win from the above list?
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. I'g go with that side, but White you have to use common sense he is too old, but then again Smith is back in 3 tests. Jake Lehmann instead of White is another that could go 4/5 with Patterson. I like the idea of Burns and Harris fighting it out for the opening position with Warner's return, may the best man win. I'll go Labuschagne for Sydney only (if does well batting give him Sri Lanka), but Maxwell otherwise. What was I thinking Baggers you got rid of Head our leading run scorer of the series. Get rid of Khawaja as well then. If Patterson comes in he comes in at 4 or 6 or Jake Lehmann but being Sydney Patterson
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. I'g go with that side, but White you have to use common sense he is too old, but then again Smith is back in 3 tests. Jake Lehmann instead of White is another that could go 4/5 with Patterson. I like the idea of Burns and Harris fighting it out for the opening position with Warner's return, may the best man win. I'll go Labuschagne for Sydney only (if does well batting give him Sri Lanka), but Maxwell otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade. If not mistaken Bumrah only opened bowling with second new ball. Ishant opened the most. (I stand corrected) I remember thinking Bumrah as their fastest bowler should be opening. Or has the Sydney heatwave got to me?
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. My batting lineup for Sydney. Harris, Burns, Khawaja, White, Patterson, Maxwell/Labu/Wade.
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia. Sharma bowls 1 Starc bowls 1 Hazlewood bowls 2 Bumrah bowls 2. Can't pick and choose as you want the cards to fall. It is what it is?
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. I would pit Sharma and H/Wood together as both seamers. Points decision to Australia.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x6 centuries and 26 50s from 103 innings is bang on average for an average player averaging 41 Maxwell with a near identical average has 7 centuries and 21 50s from 104 innings. There is also 5 years between the two. Lets invest in the younger man as we are certain to get a better return from him in the longer term. There is talk to return Labu.. with his @33 average. Could this be as they view his bowling useful for Sydney. Will someone inform CA that the SCG is no longer a spinning paradise. if you have white and maxwell you have 2 part time spinners which is enough to give support to lyon but gives you 2 batsmen averaging over 40 Burns Marsh Khawaja Pattison white Maxwell at least we will be competitive then grazor you have now typed Pattison . You are becoming confused with Pattinson I think. Just think patter as in rain drops. I'd have White at #4 to break up the lefties. too many players with similar sounding names :D Why you sticking with Marsh? Shaun? As bad as he is I'm not sure we have someone better unless lynn is available. Maybe Wade? Perhaps I've missed someone. Giving Harris another go being a youngster of Pukovski are other options Think it would be a touch harsh not to give Harris at least the 4th Test. yeah ok Marsh Burns Khawaja White Patterson Maxwell Paine Cummins Starc Lyon Tremain If you are dumping Hazlewood, Starc has to also go. I want Richardson for him. Tremain deserves his chance. His record is very good but is he technically as good as Haze?
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+xMy REPORT CARD: Finch 3 Harris 4 Khawaja 5 Marsh 5 head 5 Marsh 5 Paine 6 Cummins 9 Starc 7 Lyon 7 Hazlewood 7 Finch 11 V Virhari 21 Draw Harris 35 V Agarwal 118 Knock out blow by India Khawaja 54 V Pujara 106 Knock out blow by India S Marsh 63 V Kholi 82 Points decision India Head 54 V Rahane 35 Points decision to Australia M Marsh 19 V R Sharma 68 Knockout blow by India Paine 48 V Pant 72 Points decision India Starc 2/99 V I Sharma 3/81 Points decision India Hazlewood 3/108 V Bumrah 9/86 Killer Blow by India Cummins 9/99 + 80 runs V Shami 3/98 Killer Blow by Australia Lyons 1/150 V Jadeja 5/127 Knockout blow India So apart from Head and Cummins, those would be the only two to play for India in this test. So Australia 4-5's except Cummins 10/10 and Head 6/10
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xmy department castigates us to make sure we use the full range in grading So with that in mind and forgetting who dropped those 5 catches (apart from pain) my scores Finch 0/10 Harris 2/10 Khawaja 4/10 S Marsh 5/10 M Marsh 4/10 Paine 3/10 Cummins 10/10 Starc 5/10 Hazelwood 4/10 Lyon 2/10 That is harsh on our two quicks. Hazlewood outbowled Starc for mine. You were full of praise for their bowling effort on that sweltering day. Lyon toiled hard too. Reason I gave them all same points. Why Paine only 3? missed a pivotal catch, sloppy with byes and didn't chip in enough runs They certainly bowled without luck and it was an incredible effort but in the end they didn't break through this test. They got scored higher than most players in the team True. This was more a deck for Starc. He was the most disappointing for me.
|
|
|
|