Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Bonita isnt afraid to say how it is sometimes.
By the way what football federation around the world would have its TD accountable to the women's football department instead of the board itself? No wonder they taking ages to appoint one as they don't want him to make them accountable for there own actions then they get asked football development questions.
Imagine David Gallop getting asked raw football developments by the TD? Would look confused.
Also if the FFA had a PR manager i don't think they would be in this position.
|
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Bonita isn’t afraid to say what suits her agenda, that for certain. In there there will be some truths, some exaggeration and some skewed conclusions commensurate with her long standing bitterness.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBonita isn’t afraid to say what suits her agenda, that for certain. In there there will be some truths, some exaggeration and some skewed conclusions commensurate with her long standing bitterness. She has no agenda, get over it.
|
|
|
Lurker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
I have one question.
It took from August till the day before the dismissal for the Board to call a teleconference specifically to discuss the issue. Why couldn't the issue have waited until the next scheduled board meeting?
Surely it had to be serious and urgent. There has to be more to this than has been disclosed to date.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Bonita has no Agenda? Lol
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
crimsoncrusoe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Bonita jist keeps delivering. If ever a toxic environment was exemplified ,Bonita has done this purely by using facts. Ex employee,disgruntled or not,what facts and their conclusions are incorrect?...Apologists? When you have no answer ,but to issue an insult,you know you have lost the argument.
When one of the board members comes out and says there is no smoking gun,its clear FFA are in desperation mode trying to concoct a justifiable reason to sack Stajcic. Now the implication is the sacking was because of what he said..Lol The question is what else was said beforehand for him to say that ?....FFA?
DG
Hello Allen,we got the results of some surveys and it said stuff that we cant tell you. Um...now i am going to say something which will result in you making a comment about the Matildas working environment,without any provocation..Ok?...
AS ..The working environment here is dysfunctional and cancerous..take that and spin it whatever way you want.It's how i feel about everything here.
DG.thx for that we will reconvene the meeting tomorrow morning.
AS......OK( you sychophantic lickspittle deadshit).
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Show me one positive article. Totally dedicated to destruct the FFA, her former employer. Bonita is to the FFA what Peter Hore was to major sporting events.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
clockwork orange
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xShow me one positive article. Totally dedicated to destruct the FFA, her former employer. Bonita is to the FFA what Peter Hore was to major sporting events. Once again, not a single fact presented to refute any point Bonita has made ... confidentiality and legal reasons still constraining you?
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Overwhelming negativity and no positivity since she left her employment is more than sufficient evidence.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
lol
|
|
|
crimsoncrusoe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Lol.......
.As if a journalists job is to praise a corrupt ,secretive and incompetent organisation.
You dont change injustice by praising it!
Bonita is doing a job most of us support ,because we dont like what what is happening at FFA amd want change.
As I said before ,address the points she makes not her.She is the messenger. If you dont like the message ,refute it if you can.....Can you?
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI have one question. It took from August till the day before the dismissal for the Board to call a teleconference specifically to discuss the issue. Why couldn't the issue have waited until the next scheduled board meeting? Surely it had to be serious and urgent. There has to be more to this than has been disclosed to date. If it was serious and urgent, why didn't they act sooner? So from August to 18 January, they sat around hoping a systemic cultural issue would resolve itself? I thought the survey findings were revealed in November. Surely the Board could have acted 2-3 months earlier and also organised a transition plan.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xShow me one positive article. Totally dedicated to destruct the FFA, her former employer. Bonita is to the FFA what Peter Hore was to major sporting events. https://footballtoday.news/features/ffa-arranges-training-camp-for-olyroos-in-bangkok
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Once again, the above article attacks the FFA. If you think that is overall positive I can understand why football is in the state it today. Bonita has shown bitterness towards the FFA since her dismissal. Not one positive article given the hundred or so she has written. This is not an objective journalist but one with an axe to grind. axe wielding female - Google Search
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Crack a coldy paulc, life's too short to spend it being a miserable c*nt -PB
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOnce again, the above article attacks the FFA. If you think that is overall positive I can understand why football is in the state it today. Bonita has shown bitterness towards the FFA since her dismissal. Not one positive article given the hundred or so she has written. This is not an objective journalist but one with an axe to grind. axe wielding female - Google Search She was critical of the FFA for making a bad decision then praised them for rectifying it? Either way, even if she is bitter towards the FFA, she isn't wrong. Her claims and articles are always supported - probably even more so given that she has a perception of being bitter.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Ante Milicic also tipped to take over now.
Good luck to him and the Matildas.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAnte Milicic also tipped to take over now. Good luck to him and the Matildas. Ante is a top guy. Whether he has the drive and ability to transform from assist to head coach is another thing. It's important that the Matildas also respect and trust him with the decision making. Can't help thinking a new or big name coach might have provided more motivation for the world cup.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Lurker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI have one question. It took from August till the day before the dismissal for the Board to call a teleconference specifically to discuss the issue. Why couldn't the issue have waited until the next scheduled board meeting? Surely it had to be serious and urgent. There has to be more to this than has been disclosed to date. If it was serious and urgent, why didn't they act sooner? So from August to 18 January, they sat around hoping a systemic cultural issue would resolve itself? I thought the survey findings were revealed in November. Surely the Board could have acted 2-3 months earlier and also organised a transition plan. It is feasible that it could have taken two months to undertake and review the interviews. Why isn't the press asking this question?
|
|
|
maxxie
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xIn defense of Survey Monkey, it is a 1.5b company and they are used by a number of organizations to run surveys. I'd assume there are different levels of controls and protections depending on the nature of the information being gather - the FFA may have gone for the cheap option. The need to repeatedly run 'anonymous' surveys is itself an indicator of a dysfunctional organisation. What it says is that for at least the past four years, the FFA has continued to be an organisation where staff only feel comfortable sharing their concerns anonymously. Sounds to me like they have a 'toxic environment', eh Chris? BTW - it seems that the media coverage of this is only increasing ... it's not going away FFA. Wonder how the coach selection is going. I mean with Casserly - apparently under review for his incompetence in the Stajcic affair, and the cricket player, we can all be extremely confident of a fantastic outcome. Good to see that they at least have a sense of humour if they are interviewing Ross Aloisi for the role. At least with Ross, you get to see evidence of the toxic environment every week - in the respect he shows for referees, opponents and fans. I'm just defending Survey Monkey as being a legitimate survey tool - which it is. The way the FFA has used it is and can be a problem. As for picking the next coach, that's got to be messed up. Don't know how the FFA can do it properly in this firestorm. If you are fair dinkum about understanding your organisation's culture - you actually set up these surveys with logins, such that you don't know who the individuals are but you know what part of the organisation they work in, because you actually want to know if any issues are organisation wide or specific to a team or group. You also know how many people are in each part of the organisation so you don't get 20 surveys from a team of 5. It is totally ridiculous that you survey all parts of an organisation totally anonymously and then try to identify a particular causal factor or person responsible. To survey voluntarily and anonymously - players, staff, past players and other hangers on, and then somehow claim to have determined that the problem lies with the coach is totally bizarre. Didn't the leaked survey have questions that asked if they were a member of the Matilda's squad? So answers from the players (or people who indicated they were players) would have been attributable to the them and not other members of the organisation. A more ideal way to have administered in though would have been to have duplicate surveys with different links, with each link sent to only one section of the organisation. Regardless, I agree with the second part of what you said. Bar the sections that allowed for comments, the survey wasn't designed to find specific causes, just to identify potential problems so they could be investigated further.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xIn defense of Survey Monkey, it is a 1.5b company and they are used by a number of organizations to run surveys. I'd assume there are different levels of controls and protections depending on the nature of the information being gather - the FFA may have gone for the cheap option. The need to repeatedly run 'anonymous' surveys is itself an indicator of a dysfunctional organisation. What it says is that for at least the past four years, the FFA has continued to be an organisation where staff only feel comfortable sharing their concerns anonymously. Sounds to me like they have a 'toxic environment', eh Chris? BTW - it seems that the media coverage of this is only increasing ... it's not going away FFA. Wonder how the coach selection is going. I mean with Casserly - apparently under review for his incompetence in the Stajcic affair, and the cricket player, we can all be extremely confident of a fantastic outcome. Good to see that they at least have a sense of humour if they are interviewing Ross Aloisi for the role. At least with Ross, you get to see evidence of the toxic environment every week - in the respect he shows for referees, opponents and fans. I'm just defending Survey Monkey as being a legitimate survey tool - which it is. The way the FFA has used it is and can be a problem. As for picking the next coach, that's got to be messed up. Don't know how the FFA can do it properly in this firestorm. If you are fair dinkum about understanding your organisation's culture - you actually set up these surveys with logins, such that you don't know who the individuals are but you know what part of the organisation they work in, because you actually want to know if any issues are organisation wide or specific to a team or group. You also know how many people are in each part of the organisation so you don't get 20 surveys from a team of 5. It is totally ridiculous that you survey all parts of an organisation totally anonymously and then try to identify a particular causal factor or person responsible. To survey voluntarily and anonymously - players, staff, past players and other hangers on, and then somehow claim to have determined that the problem lies with the coach is totally bizarre. Didn't the leaked survey have questions that asked if they were a member of the Matilda's squad? So answers from the players (or people who indicated they were players) would have been attributable to the them and not other members of the organisation. A more ideal way to have administered in though would have been to have duplicate surveys with different links, with each link sent to only one section of the organisation. Regardless, I agree with the second part of what you said. Bar the sections that allowed for comments, the survey wasn't designed to find specific causes, just to identify potential problems so they could be investigated further. The surveys were only part of story and were not exclusively linked to Stajcic's sacking but indeed were an important part of it.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
crimsoncrusoe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Paulc,Your source for making such a definitive statement?
Btw,why do you never have anything positive to say about Bonita?
It seems like you are bitter towards her for some reason. Always so negative. Is there nothing positive you can say?
Lol
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI have one question. It took from August till the day before the dismissal for the Board to call a teleconference specifically to discuss the issue. Why couldn't the issue have waited until the next scheduled board meeting? Surely it had to be serious and urgent. There has to be more to this than has been disclosed to date. If it was serious and urgent, why didn't they act sooner? So from August to 18 January, they sat around hoping a systemic cultural issue would resolve itself? I thought the survey findings were revealed in November. Surely the Board could have acted 2-3 months earlier and also organised a transition plan. It is feasible that it could have taken two months to undertake and review the interviews. Why isn't the press asking this question? I think they have. So have members of Congress. What's more concerning is the FFA couldn't even build a timeline of events for this period from the outset and it took them a month to come up with it.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPaulc,Your source for making such a definitive statement? Btw,why do you never have anything positive to say about Bonita? It seems like you are bitter towards her for some reason. Always so negative. Is there nothing positive you can say? Lol He clearly has an agenda against her. Show me one positive statement he has made about her...
|
|
|
miron mercedes
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOverwhelming negativity and no positivity since she left her employment is more than sufficient evidence. You are all about the negative points she raises....now ...can you give us all the positive things the FFA have done in the past two years that you would like her to write about ? point by point please ......
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Must be hard for the nuvo new dawners seeing one of their own anti FFA crusaders being called out. lol
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
miron mercedes
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMust be hard for the nuvo new dawners seeing one of their own anti FFA crusaders being called out. lol called out ? by whom and about what ? ...oh and no answer to my questions above ? Please quote the positive points that Mersiades should have been writing about the FFA overthe past few years ...I am curious ...
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xMust be hard for the nuvo new dawners seeing one of their own anti FFA crusaders being called out. lol called out ? by whom and about what ? ...oh and no answer to my questions above ? Please quote the positive points that Mersiades should have been writing about the FFA overthe past few years ...I am curious ... Your curiosity is only there because of your unfettered hatred of the FFA and anyone who disagrees with you.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
miron mercedes
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xMust be hard for the nuvo new dawners seeing one of their own anti FFA crusaders being called out. lol called out ? by whom and about what ? ...oh and no answer to my questions above ? Please quote the positive points that Mersiades should have been writing about the FFA overthe past few years ...I am curious ... Your curiosity is only there because of your unfettered hatred of the FFA and anyone who disagrees with you. ..and once again you have answered nothing .....you make statements but when asked to clarify you won't...because you can't.. I have no more time for you . BTW....I don't hate the FFA ...I dislike what they are doing to my game right now ......I also don't hate you ....you don't mean anything to me at all .
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xCrack a coldy paulc, life's too short to spend it being a miserable c*nt -PB You're signature is a work of art
|
|
|