rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x"Conley was named the acting White House physician in March 2018 when Trump’s first choice, Dr Ronny Jackson, withdrew. Trained as an osteopath, Conley, who is also a US navy commander, was confirmed to the role two months later." "Conley was born in Pennsylvania in 1980 and graduated from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine in 2006 before undertaking a medical residency at a navy base in Virginia." Not even a real fucking doctor lol -PB In the USA, the DO USA is a degree in Osteopathic Medicine. Individuals who hold a DO USA or MD are fully qualified ' physicians' who are licensed to prescribe medication and perform surgery in the USA1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
North Korea would be proud of that.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x"Conley was named the acting White House physician in March 2018 when Trump’s first choice, Dr Ronny Jackson, withdrew. Trained as an osteopath, Conley, who is also a US navy commander, was confirmed to the role two months later." "Conley was born in Pennsylvania in 1980 and graduated from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine in 2006 before undertaking a medical residency at a navy base in Virginia." Not even a real fucking doctor lol -PB Hahahaha. Fucking osteopath.... LoL.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xAnyone see that made for TV crap of him leaving lol He could hardly breathe when he took the mask off. Contagious k*nt is walking around infecting people, what a fucking twat. -PB Not only that the fuckhead gets out of hospital and literally says there's nothing to worry about literally killing Trumpsters in the future who now think there's nothing to worry about. I mean a normal bloke would have said thanks to the medical staff, considered himself lucky not to have been struck down worse and how everyone needs to be as careful as they can be going forward. Not this narcissistic peanut. It's absolutely mind boggling and staggeringly irresponsible. People will now die because of him. Would love to see a Trump sycophant defend this behaviour.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
"Conley was named the acting White House physician in March 2018 when Trump’s first choice, Dr Ronny Jackson, withdrew. Trained as an osteopath, Conley, who is also a US navy commander, was confirmed to the role two months later." "Conley was born in Pennsylvania in 1980 and graduated from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine in 2006 before undertaking a medical residency at a navy base in Virginia." Not even a real fucking doctor lol -PB
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAnyone see that made for TV crap of him leaving lol He could hardly breathe when he took the mask off. Next level: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1313267143232942081
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAnyone see that made for TV crap of him leaving lol He could hardly breathe when he took the mask off. Contagious k*nt is walking around infecting people, what a fucking twat. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Anyone see that made for TV crap of him leaving lol
He could hardly breathe when he took the mask off.
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xStrongly recommend The Comey Rule if you haven't seen it already. You can engrave Gleeson's name on the Emmy already. I loved it, although I thought they made Trump a bit more menacing than he actually is. None the less, it’s downright scary. I love that actor who played Comey
|
|
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Strongly recommend The Comey Rule if you haven't seen it already. You can engrave Gleeson's name on the Emmy already.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+xFeel bad for those poor Secret Service - oops, I just ate my own poop...s -PB Like an m.d stated they're now have to quartine for 14 days . They risked their lives for political theatre. Seriously is trump so narcissistic that he'll risk people's lives? Wait dont answer that
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Feel bad for those poor Secret Service - oops, I just ate my own poop...s -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI want to know how Trump still caught it considering he took hydroxychloroquine to prevent it? And also why is he not now receiving it as a treatment considering he, Fox news, hell even our own sky news and The Australian newspaper with world-renowned scientists like Chris Kenny and conservative politicians told us it was an effective treatment and cure for Covid.... The HCQ issue is not as black and white as you seem to think. And I get that people with TDS might finds that hard to accept that Trump miht have been on to something. I swear if Trump announced a cure for cancer there'd be people who'd blame for him for the rain on the way to work. Try this for some reputable information: "Among participants in this trial who took HCQ earlier following exposure, there was a greater trend towards protection, such that among the few participants in this trial who took HCQ one day after exposure, the point estimate for relative risk reduction was -49%. " and "CQ/HCQ is now widely used to prevent COVID-19 in countries accounting for up to 20% of the world’s healthcare workers. Indeed, in India, for example, the Health Ministry recommends its use for a wide range of frontline workers, citing observational studies showing its benefit [15]." https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/opinion/insight/down-but-not-out-hydroxychloroquine-could-still-have-a-role-against-covid-19/20208233.article?firstPass=false He was not on to anything.
He has covid. He is not being treated with it.
Case closed.
You mean he's not being treated on the basis of information that is now 6 months old and may not be appropriate for him-why would he be? When was it appropriate? Ideally, within a day of the infection, but "inappropriate for him" doesn't mean only "when", but also "if", "how", "how much" and for "how long" I thought Trump said he was taking HCQ already as a preventative measure. Was he? I hadn't heard that. Anyway if he was it might reduced his risk by up to 50%. 50% is not 100%. It might also mean the disease is less severe for him. I don't know his full medical history. There’s video of him saying so. Doctors haven’t been touting it of late, so I presume it’s not effective. He’s got another cocktail being used instead.
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI want to know how Trump still caught it considering he took hydroxychloroquine to prevent it? And also why is he not now receiving it as a treatment considering he, Fox news, hell even our own sky news and The Australian newspaper with world-renowned scientists like Chris Kenny and conservative politicians told us it was an effective treatment and cure for Covid.... The HCQ issue is not as black and white as you seem to think. And I get that people with TDS might finds that hard to accept that Trump miht have been on to something. I swear if Trump announced a cure for cancer there'd be people who'd blame for him for the rain on the way to work. Try this for some reputable information: "Among participants in this trial who took HCQ earlier following exposure, there was a greater trend towards protection, such that among the few participants in this trial who took HCQ one day after exposure, the point estimate for relative risk reduction was -49%. " and "CQ/HCQ is now widely used to prevent COVID-19 in countries accounting for up to 20% of the world’s healthcare workers. Indeed, in India, for example, the Health Ministry recommends its use for a wide range of frontline workers, citing observational studies showing its benefit [15]." https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/opinion/insight/down-but-not-out-hydroxychloroquine-could-still-have-a-role-against-covid-19/20208233.article?firstPass=false He was not on to anything.
He has covid. He is not being treated with it.
Case closed.
You mean he's not being treated on the basis of information that is now 6 months old and may not be appropriate for him-why would he be? When was it appropriate? Ideally, within a day of the infection, but "inappropriate for him" doesn't mean only "when", but also "if", "how", "how much" and for "how long" I thought Trump said he was taking HCQ already as a preventative measure. Was he? I hadn't heard that. Anyway if he was it might reduced his risk by up to 50%. 50% is not 100%. It might also mean the disease is less severe for him. I don't know his full medical history. https://theconversation.com/donald-trump-is-taking-hydroxychloroquine-to-ward-off-covid-19-is-that-wise-139031
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xTwo groups that hate each other armed to the teeth. What could go wrong? Who are this group?
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI want to know how Trump still caught it considering he took hydroxychloroquine to prevent it? And also why is he not now receiving it as a treatment considering he, Fox news, hell even our own sky news and The Australian newspaper with world-renowned scientists like Chris Kenny and conservative politicians told us it was an effective treatment and cure for Covid.... The HCQ issue is not as black and white as you seem to think. And I get that people with TDS might finds that hard to accept that Trump miht have been on to something. I swear if Trump announced a cure for cancer there'd be people who'd blame for him for the rain on the way to work. Try this for some reputable information: "Among participants in this trial who took HCQ earlier following exposure, there was a greater trend towards protection, such that among the few participants in this trial who took HCQ one day after exposure, the point estimate for relative risk reduction was -49%. " and "CQ/HCQ is now widely used to prevent COVID-19 in countries accounting for up to 20% of the world’s healthcare workers. Indeed, in India, for example, the Health Ministry recommends its use for a wide range of frontline workers, citing observational studies showing its benefit [15]." https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/opinion/insight/down-but-not-out-hydroxychloroquine-could-still-have-a-role-against-covid-19/20208233.article?firstPass=false He was not on to anything.
He has covid. He is not being treated with it.
Case closed.
You mean he's not being treated on the basis of information that is now 6 months old and may not be appropriate for him-why would he be? When was it appropriate? Ideally, within a day of the infection, but "inappropriate for him" doesn't mean only "when", but also "if", "how", "how much" and for "how long" I thought Trump said he was taking HCQ already as a preventative measure. Was he? I hadn't heard that. Anyway if he was it might reduced his risk by up to 50%. 50% is not 100%. It might also mean the disease is less severe for him. I don't know his full medical history.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOn the issue of poverty in the US: Of those living in poverty, there are 24 million whites, 10 million hispanics, 8 million blacks and 2 million asians. That's 44 million in total, and 55% of them are white. Blacks are just 22% of people living in poverty in the US, yet apparently that's more important to address in dealing with poverty in the US. The other 78% don't matter. And what is the black percentage of the whole population in the US? Who cares? We're talking about poverty. Do you want to fix poverty for as many people as you can, or do you want to virtue signal and "take the knee", and leave 78% percent of the poverty population behind? 5% of 100 is more than 90% of 10. The reason why I ask is because if the Black population then make up less than 22% of U.S, (or White more than 55%, etc, etc), than there can be a correlation of this being because it's "built into the system". There's nothing "built in to the system". American Asians have the lowest rate of poverty-is the "system" built to benefit Asians? Of course not. Its their culture of traditional family and extended family values, education and hard work that sees them and their children avoid poverty. The strongest correlation with poverty and blacks is that black kids are 3 times as likely to grow up in single parent families and twice as likely to be born to a child-parent, as whites.
Fix that and I guarantee you will fix black over-representation in poverty, crime, murder, police shootings.But good luck doing something not even Obama could do. Hell he couldn't even get anyone on his own side to agree with him that it even was a problem, mainly because it didn't fit the progressives anti-traditional ( mum dad and kids) family agenda. This is what I mean by 'built in to the system' Overturning that isn't going to be done overnight. Or probably even 8 years. But because of how things worked in the past, its been socially ingrained. And how did the progressives respond to Obama's speech on absent black fathers? They double down on their anti-traditional family narrative. (incidentally the BLM website had as one of its goals "the dismantling of the patriarchal, Western prescribe family unit" on their website. Until people cottoned on to what these Marxists were really up to, which saw support for BLM free-fall, actually helping Trump, and so they wiped it off the website. Notice how the "progressive" media has now gone quiet on BLM...) Having a look at the official website I could find nothing what you just quoted. However, I did find this: https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/17/fake-blm-manifesto-fascist/ Of course you didn't find anything- BLM took it down a week or two back!c LOL What you've linked to is a bullshit, and weak attempt to misdirect blame to some made-up site. Here is the archive of the original BLM site: https://web.archive.org/web/20200408020723/https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/The fact that you REALY must have tried to be misinformed is interesting. I found the archive in literally under 30 seconds with a single google search. Hilarious. I don't see your original quote in there at all. Did you look: "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable" Note that word. BLM took their manifesto down because it exposed them as the Marxists they are who were using blacks for political gain, and their support plummeted. Source? Google "BLM removes web page". Take your pick.
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xI want to know how Trump still caught it considering he took hydroxychloroquine to prevent it? And also why is he not now receiving it as a treatment considering he, Fox news, hell even our own sky news and The Australian newspaper with world-renowned scientists like Chris Kenny and conservative politicians told us it was an effective treatment and cure for Covid.... The HCQ issue is not as black and white as you seem to think. And I get that people with TDS might finds that hard to accept that Trump miht have been on to something. I swear if Trump announced a cure for cancer there'd be people who'd blame for him for the rain on the way to work. Try this for some reputable information: "Among participants in this trial who took HCQ earlier following exposure, there was a greater trend towards protection, such that among the few participants in this trial who took HCQ one day after exposure, the point estimate for relative risk reduction was -49%. " and "CQ/HCQ is now widely used to prevent COVID-19 in countries accounting for up to 20% of the world’s healthcare workers. Indeed, in India, for example, the Health Ministry recommends its use for a wide range of frontline workers, citing observational studies showing its benefit [15]." https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/opinion/insight/down-but-not-out-hydroxychloroquine-could-still-have-a-role-against-covid-19/20208233.article?firstPass=false He was not on to anything.
He has covid. He is not being treated with it.
Case closed.
You mean he's not being treated on the basis of information that is now 6 months old and may not be appropriate for him-why would he be? When was it appropriate? Ideally, within a day of the infection, but "inappropriate for him" doesn't mean only "when", but also "if", "how", "how much" and for "how long" I thought Trump said he was taking HCQ already as a preventative measure.
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOn the issue of poverty in the US: Of those living in poverty, there are 24 million whites, 10 million hispanics, 8 million blacks and 2 million asians. That's 44 million in total, and 55% of them are white. Blacks are just 22% of people living in poverty in the US, yet apparently that's more important to address in dealing with poverty in the US. The other 78% don't matter. And what is the black percentage of the whole population in the US? Who cares? We're talking about poverty. Do you want to fix poverty for as many people as you can, or do you want to virtue signal and "take the knee", and leave 78% percent of the poverty population behind? 5% of 100 is more than 90% of 10. The reason why I ask is because if the Black population then make up less than 22% of U.S, (or White more than 55%, etc, etc), than there can be a correlation of this being because it's "built into the system". There's nothing "built in to the system". American Asians have the lowest rate of poverty-is the "system" built to benefit Asians? Of course not. Its their culture of traditional family and extended family values, education and hard work that sees them and their children avoid poverty. The strongest correlation with poverty and blacks is that black kids are 3 times as likely to grow up in single parent families and twice as likely to be born to a child-parent, as whites.
Fix that and I guarantee you will fix black over-representation in poverty, crime, murder, police shootings.But good luck doing something not even Obama could do. Hell he couldn't even get anyone on his own side to agree with him that it even was a problem, mainly because it didn't fit the progressives anti-traditional ( mum dad and kids) family agenda. This is what I mean by 'built in to the system' Overturning that isn't going to be done overnight. Or probably even 8 years. But because of how things worked in the past, its been socially ingrained. And how did the progressives respond to Obama's speech on absent black fathers? They double down on their anti-traditional family narrative. (incidentally the BLM website had as one of its goals "the dismantling of the patriarchal, Western prescribe family unit" on their website. Until people cottoned on to what these Marxists were really up to, which saw support for BLM free-fall, actually helping Trump, and so they wiped it off the website. Notice how the "progressive" media has now gone quiet on BLM...) Having a look at the official website I could find nothing what you just quoted. However, I did find this: https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/17/fake-blm-manifesto-fascist/ Of course you didn't find anything- BLM took it down a week or two back!c LOL What you've linked to is a bullshit, and weak attempt to misdirect blame to some made-up site. Here is the archive of the original BLM site: https://web.archive.org/web/20200408020723/https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/The fact that you REALY must have tried to be misinformed is interesting. I found the archive in literally under 30 seconds with a single google search. Hilarious. I don't see your original quote in there at all. Did you look: "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable" Note that word. BLM took their manifesto down because it exposed them as the Marxists they are who were using blacks for political gain, and their support plummeted. Source?
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xI want to know how Trump still caught it considering he took hydroxychloroquine to prevent it? And also why is he not now receiving it as a treatment considering he, Fox news, hell even our own sky news and The Australian newspaper with world-renowned scientists like Chris Kenny and conservative politicians told us it was an effective treatment and cure for Covid.... The HCQ issue is not as black and white as you seem to think. And I get that people with TDS might finds that hard to accept that Trump miht have been on to something. I swear if Trump announced a cure for cancer there'd be people who'd blame for him for the rain on the way to work. Try this for some reputable information: "Among participants in this trial who took HCQ earlier following exposure, there was a greater trend towards protection, such that among the few participants in this trial who took HCQ one day after exposure, the point estimate for relative risk reduction was -49%. " and "CQ/HCQ is now widely used to prevent COVID-19 in countries accounting for up to 20% of the world’s healthcare workers. Indeed, in India, for example, the Health Ministry recommends its use for a wide range of frontline workers, citing observational studies showing its benefit [15]." https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/opinion/insight/down-but-not-out-hydroxychloroquine-could-still-have-a-role-against-covid-19/20208233.article?firstPass=false He was not on to anything.
He has covid. He is not being treated with it.
Case closed.
You mean he's not being treated on the basis of information that is now 6 months old and may not be appropriate for him-why would he be? When was it appropriate? Ideally, within a day of the infection, but "inappropriate for him" doesn't mean only "when", but also "if", "how", "how much" and for "how long"
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOn the issue of poverty in the US: Of those living in poverty, there are 24 million whites, 10 million hispanics, 8 million blacks and 2 million asians. That's 44 million in total, and 55% of them are white. Blacks are just 22% of people living in poverty in the US, yet apparently that's more important to address in dealing with poverty in the US. The other 78% don't matter. And what is the black percentage of the whole population in the US? Who cares? We're talking about poverty. Do you want to fix poverty for as many people as you can, or do you want to virtue signal and "take the knee", and leave 78% percent of the poverty population behind? 5% of 100 is more than 90% of 10. The reason why I ask is because if the Black population then make up less than 22% of U.S, (or White more than 55%, etc, etc), than there can be a correlation of this being because it's "built into the system". There's nothing "built in to the system". American Asians have the lowest rate of poverty-is the "system" built to benefit Asians? Of course not. Its their culture of traditional family and extended family values, education and hard work that sees them and their children avoid poverty. The strongest correlation with poverty and blacks is that black kids are 3 times as likely to grow up in single parent families and twice as likely to be born to a child-parent, as whites.
Fix that and I guarantee you will fix black over-representation in poverty, crime, murder, police shootings.But good luck doing something not even Obama could do. Hell he couldn't even get anyone on his own side to agree with him that it even was a problem, mainly because it didn't fit the progressives anti-traditional ( mum dad and kids) family agenda. This is what I mean by 'built in to the system' Overturning that isn't going to be done overnight. Or probably even 8 years. But because of how things worked in the past, its been socially ingrained. And how did the progressives respond to Obama's speech on absent black fathers? They double down on their anti-traditional family narrative. (incidentally the BLM website had as one of its goals "the dismantling of the patriarchal, Western prescribe family unit" on their website. Until people cottoned on to what these Marxists were really up to, which saw support for BLM free-fall, actually helping Trump, and so they wiped it off the website. Notice how the "progressive" media has now gone quiet on BLM...) Having a look at the official website I could find nothing what you just quoted. However, I did find this: https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/17/fake-blm-manifesto-fascist/ Of course you didn't find anything- BLM took it down a week or two back!c LOL What you've linked to is a bullshit, and weak attempt to misdirect blame to some made-up site. Here is the archive of the original BLM site: https://web.archive.org/web/20200408020723/https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/The fact that you REALY must have tried to be misinformed is interesting. I found the archive in literally under 30 seconds with a single google search. Hilarious. I don't see your original quote in there at all. Did you look: "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable" Note that word. so when you said "at all" you meant "one word" BLM took their manifesto down because it exposed them as the Marxists they are who were using blacks for political gain, and their support plummeted.
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Two groups that hate each other armed to the teeth. What could go wrong?
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOn the issue of poverty in the US: Of those living in poverty, there are 24 million whites, 10 million hispanics, 8 million blacks and 2 million asians. That's 44 million in total, and 55% of them are white. Blacks are just 22% of people living in poverty in the US, yet apparently that's more important to address in dealing with poverty in the US. The other 78% don't matter. And what is the black percentage of the whole population in the US? Who cares? We're talking about poverty. Do you want to fix poverty for as many people as you can, or do you want to virtue signal and "take the knee", and leave 78% percent of the poverty population behind? 5% of 100 is more than 90% of 10. The reason why I ask is because if the Black population then make up less than 22% of U.S, (or White more than 55%, etc, etc), than there can be a correlation of this being because it's "built into the system". There's nothing "built in to the system". American Asians have the lowest rate of poverty-is the "system" built to benefit Asians? Of course not. Its their culture of traditional family and extended family values, education and hard work that sees them and their children avoid poverty. The strongest correlation with poverty and blacks is that black kids are 3 times as likely to grow up in single parent families and twice as likely to be born to a child-parent, as whites.
Fix that and I guarantee you will fix black over-representation in poverty, crime, murder, police shootings.But good luck doing something not even Obama could do. Hell he couldn't even get anyone on his own side to agree with him that it even was a problem, mainly because it didn't fit the progressives anti-traditional ( mum dad and kids) family agenda. This is what I mean by 'built in to the system' Overturning that isn't going to be done overnight. Or probably even 8 years. But because of how things worked in the past, its been socially ingrained. And how did the progressives respond to Obama's speech on absent black fathers? They double down on their anti-traditional family narrative. (incidentally the BLM website had as one of its goals "the dismantling of the patriarchal, Western prescribe family unit" on their website. Until people cottoned on to what these Marxists were really up to, which saw support for BLM free-fall, actually helping Trump, and so they wiped it off the website. Notice how the "progressive" media has now gone quiet on BLM...) Having a look at the official website I could find nothing what you just quoted. However, I did find this: https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/17/fake-blm-manifesto-fascist/ Of course you didn't find anything- BLM took it down a week or two back!c LOL What you've linked to is a bullshit, and weak attempt to misdirect blame to some made-up site. Here is the archive of the original BLM site: https://web.archive.org/web/20200408020723/https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/The fact that you REALY must have tried to be misinformed is interesting. I found the archive in literally under 30 seconds with a single google search. Hilarious. I don't see your original quote in there at all. Did you look: "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable" Note that word.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI want to know how Trump still caught it considering he took hydroxychloroquine to prevent it? And also why is he not now receiving it as a treatment considering he, Fox news, hell even our own sky news and The Australian newspaper with world-renowned scientists like Chris Kenny and conservative politicians told us it was an effective treatment and cure for Covid.... The HCQ issue is not as black and white as you seem to think. And I get that people with TDS might finds that hard to accept that Trump miht have been on to something. I swear if Trump announced a cure for cancer there'd be people who'd blame for him for the rain on the way to work. Try this for some reputable information: "Among participants in this trial who took HCQ earlier following exposure, there was a greater trend towards protection, such that among the few participants in this trial who took HCQ one day after exposure, the point estimate for relative risk reduction was -49%. " and "CQ/HCQ is now widely used to prevent COVID-19 in countries accounting for up to 20% of the world’s healthcare workers. Indeed, in India, for example, the Health Ministry recommends its use for a wide range of frontline workers, citing observational studies showing its benefit [15]." https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/opinion/insight/down-but-not-out-hydroxychloroquine-could-still-have-a-role-against-covid-19/20208233.article?firstPass=false He was not on to anything.
He has covid. He is not being treated with it.
Case closed.
You mean he's not being treated on the basis of information that is now 6 months old and may not be appropriate for him-why would he be? When was it appropriate?
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI want to know how Trump still caught it considering he took hydroxychloroquine to prevent it? And also why is he not now receiving it as a treatment considering he, Fox news, hell even our own sky news and The Australian newspaper with world-renowned scientists like Chris Kenny and conservative politicians told us it was an effective treatment and cure for Covid.... The HCQ issue is not as black and white as you seem to think. And I get that people with TDS might finds that hard to accept that Trump miht have been on to something. I swear if Trump announced a cure for cancer there'd be people who'd blame for him for the rain on the way to work. Try this for some reputable information: "Among participants in this trial who took HCQ earlier following exposure, there was a greater trend towards protection, such that among the few participants in this trial who took HCQ one day after exposure, the point estimate for relative risk reduction was -49%. " and "CQ/HCQ is now widely used to prevent COVID-19 in countries accounting for up to 20% of the world’s healthcare workers. Indeed, in India, for example, the Health Ministry recommends its use for a wide range of frontline workers, citing observational studies showing its benefit [15]." https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/opinion/insight/down-but-not-out-hydroxychloroquine-could-still-have-a-role-against-covid-19/20208233.article?firstPass=false He was not on to anything.
He has covid. He is not being treated with it.
Case closed.
You mean he's not being treated on the basis of information that is now 6 months old and may not be appropriate for him-why would he be?
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOn the issue of poverty in the US: Of those living in poverty, there are 24 million whites, 10 million hispanics, 8 million blacks and 2 million asians. That's 44 million in total, and 55% of them are white. Blacks are just 22% of people living in poverty in the US, yet apparently that's more important to address in dealing with poverty in the US. The other 78% don't matter. And what is the black percentage of the whole population in the US? Who cares? We're talking about poverty. Do you want to fix poverty for as many people as you can, or do you want to virtue signal and "take the knee", and leave 78% percent of the poverty population behind? 5% of 100 is more than 90% of 10. The reason why I ask is because if the Black population then make up less than 22% of U.S, (or White more than 55%, etc, etc), than there can be a correlation of this being because it's "built into the system". There's nothing "built in to the system". American Asians have the lowest rate of poverty-is the "system" built to benefit Asians? Of course not. Its their culture of traditional family and extended family values, education and hard work that sees them and their children avoid poverty. The strongest correlation with poverty and blacks is that black kids are 3 times as likely to grow up in single parent families and twice as likely to be born to a child-parent, as whites.
Fix that and I guarantee you will fix black over-representation in poverty, crime, murder, police shootings.But good luck doing something not even Obama could do. Hell he couldn't even get anyone on his own side to agree with him that it even was a problem, mainly because it didn't fit the progressives anti-traditional ( mum dad and kids) family agenda. This is what I mean by 'built in to the system' Overturning that isn't going to be done overnight. Or probably even 8 years. But because of how things worked in the past, its been socially ingrained. And how did the progressives respond to Obama's speech on absent black fathers? They double down on their anti-traditional family narrative. (incidentally the BLM website had as one of its goals "the dismantling of the patriarchal, Western prescribe family unit" on their website. Until people cottoned on to what these Marxists were really up to, which saw support for BLM free-fall, actually helping Trump, and so they wiped it off the website. Notice how the "progressive" media has now gone quiet on BLM...) Having a look at the official website I could find nothing what you just quoted. However, I did find this: https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/17/fake-blm-manifesto-fascist/ Of course you didn't find anything- BLM took it down a week or two back!c LOL What you've linked to is a bullshit, and weak attempt to misdirect blame to some made-up site. Here is the archive of the original BLM site: https://web.archive.org/web/20200408020723/https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/The fact that you REALY must have tried to be misinformed is interesting. I found the archive in literally under 30 seconds with a single google search. Hilarious. I don't see your original quote in there at all. Did you look: "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable"
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
How America hasn't broken out into open conflict yet I do not know. https://twitter.com/msingerx/status/1312559981418299394?s=20And Trump’s Covid messaging: JAN: It’s under control FEB: It’s a hoax M: Packed churches by Easter APRIL: It’s going away MAY: Time to open up JUNE: Just embers JULY: Time to open schools AUG: Other countries are worse SEPT: Vaccines coming soon! OCT: *tweeting from the hospital*
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOn the issue of poverty in the US: Of those living in poverty, there are 24 million whites, 10 million hispanics, 8 million blacks and 2 million asians. That's 44 million in total, and 55% of them are white. Blacks are just 22% of people living in poverty in the US, yet apparently that's more important to address in dealing with poverty in the US. The other 78% don't matter. And what is the black percentage of the whole population in the US? Who cares? We're talking about poverty. Do you want to fix poverty for as many people as you can, or do you want to virtue signal and "take the knee", and leave 78% percent of the poverty population behind? 5% of 100 is more than 90% of 10. The reason why I ask is because if the Black population then make up less than 22% of U.S, (or White more than 55%, etc, etc), than there can be a correlation of this being because it's "built into the system". There's nothing "built in to the system". American Asians have the lowest rate of poverty-is the "system" built to benefit Asians? Of course not. Its their culture of traditional family and extended family values, education and hard work that sees them and their children avoid poverty. The strongest correlation with poverty and blacks is that black kids are 3 times as likely to grow up in single parent families and twice as likely to be born to a child-parent, as whites.
Fix that and I guarantee you will fix black over-representation in poverty, crime, murder, police shootings.But good luck doing something not even Obama could do. Hell he couldn't even get anyone on his own side to agree with him that it even was a problem, mainly because it didn't fit the progressives anti-traditional ( mum dad and kids) family agenda. This is what I mean by 'built in to the system' Overturning that isn't going to be done overnight. Or probably even 8 years. But because of how things worked in the past, its been socially ingrained. And how did the progressives respond to Obama's speech on absent black fathers? They double down on their anti-traditional family narrative. (incidentally the BLM website had as one of its goals "the dismantling of the patriarchal, Western prescribe family unit" on their website. Until people cottoned on to what these Marxists were really up to, which saw support for BLM free-fall, actually helping Trump, and so they wiped it off the website. Notice how the "progressive" media has now gone quiet on BLM...) Having a look at the official website I could find nothing what you just quoted. However, I did find this: https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/17/fake-blm-manifesto-fascist/ Of course you didn't find anything- BLM took it down a week or two back!c LOL What you've linked to is a bullshit, and weak attempt to misdirect blame to some made-up site. Here is the archive of the original BLM site: https://web.archive.org/web/20200408020723/https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/The fact that you REALY must have tried to be misinformed is interesting. I found the archive in literally under 30 seconds with a single google search. Hilarious. I don't see your original quote in there at all.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|