Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xfirst class interview from Waleed Aly this shows the chilling cult of conspiracy and someone who managed to break away from it The Freedom Fighter Who Escaped The World Of Conspiracy Theories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8YaBWN4yuE Before that he was probably somebody who believed he was a health risk for stepping on a bus without wearing a mask despite borders being open and no other caps or limits in place, in a country with vaccination rates over 95% Not on a bus but that's very likely how I caught it mate. I was even outdoors. Right and from what I read you and your family did quite well because you were all vaccinated. You also caught it despite following all face mask regulations which highlights how fruitless they were There have been 3.15m cases reported in Australia and well over 80% would have been through work places, households or shared facilities. Having mask laws for just public transport seems odd, especially given the substantial evidence that masks are ineffective against the latest variants If there is no end date on mask laws for public transport it will just be an indefinite law that some people obey and some dont. I cant see a time where health officials will say they are no longer required given the obvious stake they have in them. If Covid rules are reviewed regularly then I'm at an absolute loss how any rational response team with the interests in moving away from restrictions will see public transport as a high risk area worth targetting This is the kind of thing that needs to be made public for scrutiny. I'd like to see what modelling says masks on public transport is what is keeping Australia from being overwhelmed with cases Agree. Would love to see all the medical advice and modelling given throughout the pandemic. Government should be open about this. I agree but most people don't know how to interpret the models correctly, bluebird especially would be bad at this. It's up to the experts to explain this clearly to people. If you can't explain it clearly, then you need to do better and perhaps you're not that much of an expert :) I also think full disclosure on some of this would highlight the inconsistency in certain Government decisions (some of which I believe is not based on medical advice, but commercial). I work in open data and am definitely a supporter of having this sort of information out there in the public domain. However you have to be realistic, there are hard facts out there now that are publicly accessible (such as covid death stats) that are interpreted completely wrongly either because the person isn't capable of it or even worse they have nefarious motives to push a narrative. Modelling is even more complex to understand. There's definitely some decisions that were done for "economic" reasons. No doubt about that. Whether that's always a bad thing is up for debate and I agree it'd be good to know. Just won't be politically popular so it will never happen. Data will always be misinterpreted by those who want to push an agenda. Rather things out in the open that's all.
|
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xfirst class interview from Waleed Aly this shows the chilling cult of conspiracy and someone who managed to break away from it The Freedom Fighter Who Escaped The World Of Conspiracy Theories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8YaBWN4yuE Before that he was probably somebody who believed he was a health risk for stepping on a bus without wearing a mask despite borders being open and no other caps or limits in place, in a country with vaccination rates over 95% Not on a bus but that's very likely how I caught it mate. I was even outdoors. Right and from what I read you and your family did quite well because you were all vaccinated. You also caught it despite following all face mask regulations which highlights how fruitless they were There have been 3.15m cases reported in Australia and well over 80% would have been through work places, households or shared facilities. Having mask laws for just public transport seems odd, especially given the substantial evidence that masks are ineffective against the latest variants If there is no end date on mask laws for public transport it will just be an indefinite law that some people obey and some dont. I cant see a time where health officials will say they are no longer required given the obvious stake they have in them. If Covid rules are reviewed regularly then I'm at an absolute loss how any rational response team with the interests in moving away from restrictions will see public transport as a high risk area worth targetting This is the kind of thing that needs to be made public for scrutiny. I'd like to see what modelling says masks on public transport is what is keeping Australia from being overwhelmed with cases Agree. Would love to see all the medical advice and modelling given throughout the pandemic. Government should be open about this. I agree but most people don't know how to interpret the models correctly, bluebird especially would be bad at this. It's up to the experts to explain this clearly to people. If you can't explain it clearly, then you need to do better and perhaps you're not that much of an expert :) I also think full disclosure on some of this would highlight the inconsistency in certain Government decisions (some of which I believe is not based on medical advice, but commercial). I work in open data and am definitely a supporter of having this sort of information out there in the public domain. However you have to be realistic, there are hard facts out there now that are publicly accessible (such as covid death stats) that are interpreted completely wrongly either because the person isn't capable of it or even worse they have nefarious motives to push a narrative. Modelling is even more complex to understand. I work in data and analysis also. The difference is I dont analyse data independently of its meaning. Its not enough to draw a straight line between two points and make predictions based on growth patterns. Every single instance of an outbreak we have seen globally has been a wave pattern. Yet epidemiologists continue to provide predictions based on linear and indefinite growth. They also work with state averages independent of geographical and social trends. They put a lot of meaning in the r figure which is a product of the data instead of a driver of it In fact when you have a look at the modelling they do release and read the assumptions and limitations, you'd laugh your ass off. The modelling is used for no reason other than to support the recommendations. Its the classic start with the answer then look for information to support it. They also write their own narrative and make definitive conclusions before they even see the data, and declare success regularly based on specious reasoning Every model in Australia has been radically wrong. Not just a little bit. Not by a reasonable amount. But completely and utterly wrong. Just like how they predicted a surge of cases when kids went back to school. I mean kids were in a bubble during the 6-7 week long break when this thing was running rampant. Kids go to school, spread diseases, and then come home and kill their grand parents I've put my predictions based on how I see things on the forum time and time again. Like how we wouldn't see 6000 cases in October in NSW or how we would see 25k-40k cases a day when we open up despite over 90% vaccinations. I havent been 100% right, but a hell of a lot closer than the leading experts. And I dont have a break down of the data like they do. Just the snippets published here or there. Nor do I have any medical degrees either If you're in the data game then you of all people should understand the importance of using the data to reach a conclusion. No matter what your wants, needs, hidden agendas, biases, prejudices are, or past claims. Whatever the data says, thats what you go with. If I saw evidence that face masks made a difference, even today, I would be asking for wide spread face mask usage Australia taking a statistical approach to this virus instead of using infectious disease experts and behavioural scientists has been its biggest weakness
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xfirst class interview from Waleed Aly this shows the chilling cult of conspiracy and someone who managed to break away from it The Freedom Fighter Who Escaped The World Of Conspiracy Theories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8YaBWN4yuE Before that he was probably somebody who believed he was a health risk for stepping on a bus without wearing a mask despite borders being open and no other caps or limits in place, in a country with vaccination rates over 95% Not on a bus but that's very likely how I caught it mate. I was even outdoors. Right and from what I read you and your family did quite well because you were all vaccinated. You also caught it despite following all face mask regulations which highlights how fruitless they were There have been 3.15m cases reported in Australia and well over 80% would have been through work places, households or shared facilities. Having mask laws for just public transport seems odd, especially given the substantial evidence that masks are ineffective against the latest variants If there is no end date on mask laws for public transport it will just be an indefinite law that some people obey and some dont. I cant see a time where health officials will say they are no longer required given the obvious stake they have in them. If Covid rules are reviewed regularly then I'm at an absolute loss how any rational response team with the interests in moving away from restrictions will see public transport as a high risk area worth targetting This is the kind of thing that needs to be made public for scrutiny. I'd like to see what modelling says masks on public transport is what is keeping Australia from being overwhelmed with cases Agree. Would love to see all the medical advice and modelling given throughout the pandemic. Government should be open about this. I agree but most people don't know how to interpret the models correctly, bluebird especially would be bad at this. It's up to the experts to explain this clearly to people. If you can't explain it clearly, then you need to do better and perhaps you're not that much of an expert :) I also think full disclosure on some of this would highlight the inconsistency in certain Government decisions (some of which I believe is not based on medical advice, but commercial). I work in open data and am definitely a supporter of having this sort of information out there in the public domain. However you have to be realistic, there are hard facts out there now that are publicly accessible (such as covid death stats) that are interpreted completely wrongly either because the person isn't capable of it or even worse they have nefarious motives to push a narrative. Modelling is even more complex to understand. I work in data and analysis also. The difference is I dont analyse data independently of its meaning. Its not enough to draw a straight line between two points and make predictions based on growth patterns. Every single instance of an outbreak we have seen globally has been a wave pattern. Yet epidemiologists continue to provide predictions based on linear and indefinite growth. They also work with state averages independent of geographical and social trends. They put a lot of meaning in the r figure which is a product of the data instead of a driver of it In fact when you have a look at the modelling they do release and read the assumptions and limitations, you'd laugh your ass off. The modelling is used for no reason other than to support the recommendations. Its the classic start with the answer then look for information to support it. They also write their own narrative and make definitive conclusions before they even see the data, and declare success regularly based on specious reasoning Every model in Australia has been radically wrong. Not just a little bit. Not by a reasonable amount. But completely and utterly wrong. Just like how they predicted a surge of cases when kids went back to school. I mean kids were in a bubble during the 6-7 week long break when this thing was running rampant. Kids go to school, spread diseases, and then come home and kill their grand parents I've put my predictions based on how I see things on the forum time and time again. Like how we wouldn't see 6000 cases in October in NSW or how we would see 25k-40k cases a day when we open up despite over 90% vaccinations. I havent been 100% right, but a hell of a lot closer than the leading experts. And I dont have a break down of the data like they do. Just the snippets published here or there. Nor do I have any medical degrees either If you're in the data game then you of all people should understand the importance of using the data to reach a conclusion. No matter what your wants, needs, hidden agendas, biases, prejudices are, or past claims. Whatever the data says, thats what you go with. If I saw evidence that face masks made a difference, even today, I would be asking for wide spread face mask usage Australia taking a statistical approach to this virus instead of using infectious disease experts and behavioural scientists has been its biggest weakness
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
no politics associated with this formula change, its all about the science (and mid terms) ‘We Are Not There Yet’: As States Drop Mask Rules, the C.D.C. Stands FirmFeb. 9, 2022 C.D.C. Resists Pressure to Change Guidance on Masks - The New York Times (nytimes.com) https://twitter.com/covid_clarity/status/1498360349975842821/photo/1 CDC eases masking recommendations for 70% of country, including inside schoolsThe majority of the country would now be considered low-to-medium risk. 26 February 2022 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/cdc-eases-masking-recommendations-70-country-including-inside/story?id=83111596
|
|
|
cesspit
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 357,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xfirst class interview from Waleed Aly this shows the chilling cult of conspiracy and someone who managed to break away from it The Freedom Fighter Who Escaped The World Of Conspiracy Theories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8YaBWN4yuE Before that he was probably somebody who believed he was a health risk for stepping on a bus without wearing a mask despite borders being open and no other caps or limits in place, in a country with vaccination rates over 95% Not on a bus but that's very likely how I caught it mate. I was even outdoors. Right and from what I read you and your family did quite well because you were all vaccinated. You also caught it despite following all face mask regulations which highlights how fruitless they were There have been 3.15m cases reported in Australia and well over 80% would have been through work places, households or shared facilities. Having mask laws for just public transport seems odd, especially given the substantial evidence that masks are ineffective against the latest variants If there is no end date on mask laws for public transport it will just be an indefinite law that some people obey and some dont. I cant see a time where health officials will say they are no longer required given the obvious stake they have in them. If Covid rules are reviewed regularly then I'm at an absolute loss how any rational response team with the interests in moving away from restrictions will see public transport as a high risk area worth targetting This is the kind of thing that needs to be made public for scrutiny. I'd like to see what modelling says masks on public transport is what is keeping Australia from being overwhelmed with cases Agree. Would love to see all the medical advice and modelling given throughout the pandemic. Government should be open about this. I agree but most people don't know how to interpret the models correctly, bluebird especially would be bad at this. It's up to the experts to explain this clearly to people. If you can't explain it clearly, then you need to do better and perhaps you're not that much of an expert :) I also think full disclosure on some of this would highlight the inconsistency in certain Government decisions (some of which I believe is not based on medical advice, but commercial). I work in open data and am definitely a supporter of having this sort of information out there in the public domain. However you have to be realistic, there are hard facts out there now that are publicly accessible (such as covid death stats) that are interpreted completely wrongly either because the person isn't capable of it or even worse they have nefarious motives to push a narrative. Modelling is even more complex to understand. I work in data and analysis also. The difference is I dont analyse data independently of its meaning. Its not enough to draw a straight line between two points and make predictions based on growth patterns. Every single instance of an outbreak we have seen globally has been a wave pattern. Yet epidemiologists continue to provide predictions based on linear and indefinite growth. They also work with state averages independent of geographical and social trends. They put a lot of meaning in the r figure which is a product of the data instead of a driver of it In fact when you have a look at the modelling they do release and read the assumptions and limitations, you'd laugh your ass off. The modelling is used for no reason other than to support the recommendations. Its the classic start with the answer then look for information to support it. They also write their own narrative and make definitive conclusions before they even see the data, and declare success regularly based on specious reasoning Every model in Australia has been radically wrong. Not just a little bit. Not by a reasonable amount. But completely and utterly wrong. Just like how they predicted a surge of cases when kids went back to school. I mean kids were in a bubble during the 6-7 week long break when this thing was running rampant. Kids go to school, spread diseases, and then come home and kill their grand parents I've put my predictions based on how I see things on the forum time and time again. Like how we wouldn't see 6000 cases in October in NSW or how we would see 25k-40k cases a day when we open up despite over 90% vaccinations. I havent been 100% right, but a hell of a lot closer than the leading experts. And I dont have a break down of the data like they do. Just the snippets published here or there. Nor do I have any medical degrees either If you're in the data game then you of all people should understand the importance of using the data to reach a conclusion. No matter what your wants, needs, hidden agendas, biases, prejudices are, or past claims. Whatever the data says, thats what you go with. If I saw evidence that face masks made a difference, even today, I would be asking for wide spread face mask usage Australia taking a statistical approach to this virus instead of using infectious disease experts and behavioural scientists has been its biggest weakness
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xfirst class interview from Waleed Aly this shows the chilling cult of conspiracy and someone who managed to break away from it The Freedom Fighter Who Escaped The World Of Conspiracy Theories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8YaBWN4yuE Before that he was probably somebody who believed he was a health risk for stepping on a bus without wearing a mask despite borders being open and no other caps or limits in place, in a country with vaccination rates over 95% Not on a bus but that's very likely how I caught it mate. I was even outdoors. Right and from what I read you and your family did quite well because you were all vaccinated. You also caught it despite following all face mask regulations which highlights how fruitless they were There have been 3.15m cases reported in Australia and well over 80% would have been through work places, households or shared facilities. Having mask laws for just public transport seems odd, especially given the substantial evidence that masks are ineffective against the latest variants If there is no end date on mask laws for public transport it will just be an indefinite law that some people obey and some dont. I cant see a time where health officials will say they are no longer required given the obvious stake they have in them. If Covid rules are reviewed regularly then I'm at an absolute loss how any rational response team with the interests in moving away from restrictions will see public transport as a high risk area worth targetting This is the kind of thing that needs to be made public for scrutiny. I'd like to see what modelling says masks on public transport is what is keeping Australia from being overwhelmed with cases Agree. Would love to see all the medical advice and modelling given throughout the pandemic. Government should be open about this. I agree but most people don't know how to interpret the models correctly, bluebird especially would be bad at this. It's up to the experts to explain this clearly to people. If you can't explain it clearly, then you need to do better and perhaps you're not that much of an expert :) I also think full disclosure on some of this would highlight the inconsistency in certain Government decisions (some of which I believe is not based on medical advice, but commercial). I work in open data and am definitely a supporter of having this sort of information out there in the public domain. However you have to be realistic, there are hard facts out there now that are publicly accessible (such as covid death stats) that are interpreted completely wrongly either because the person isn't capable of it or even worse they have nefarious motives to push a narrative. Modelling is even more complex to understand. I work in data and analysis also. The difference is I dont analyse data independently of its meaning. Its not enough to draw a straight line between two points and make predictions based on growth patterns. Every single instance of an outbreak we have seen globally has been a wave pattern. Yet epidemiologists continue to provide predictions based on linear and indefinite growth. They also work with state averages independent of geographical and social trends. They put a lot of meaning in the r figure which is a product of the data instead of a driver of it In fact when you have a look at the modelling they do release and read the assumptions and limitations, you'd laugh your ass off. The modelling is used for no reason other than to support the recommendations. Its the classic start with the answer then look for information to support it. They also write their own narrative and make definitive conclusions before they even see the data, and declare success regularly based on specious reasoning Every model in Australia has been radically wrong. Not just a little bit. Not by a reasonable amount. But completely and utterly wrong. Just like how they predicted a surge of cases when kids went back to school. I mean kids were in a bubble during the 6-7 week long break when this thing was running rampant. Kids go to school, spread diseases, and then come home and kill their grand parents I've put my predictions based on how I see things on the forum time and time again. Like how we wouldn't see 6000 cases in October in NSW or how we would see 25k-40k cases a day when we open up despite over 90% vaccinations. I havent been 100% right, but a hell of a lot closer than the leading experts. And I dont have a break down of the data like they do. Just the snippets published here or there. Nor do I have any medical degrees either If you're in the data game then you of all people should understand the importance of using the data to reach a conclusion. No matter what your wants, needs, hidden agendas, biases, prejudices are, or past claims. Whatever the data says, thats what you go with. If I saw evidence that face masks made a difference, even today, I would be asking for wide spread face mask usage Australia taking a statistical approach to this virus instead of using infectious disease experts and behavioural scientists has been its biggest weakness  That was the literal point I was making. Only one of us believes face masks on buses is the only thing keeping old people alive
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x Only one of us believes face masks on buses is the only thing keeping old people alive
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
cesspit
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 357,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xfirst class interview from Waleed Aly this shows the chilling cult of conspiracy and someone who managed to break away from it The Freedom Fighter Who Escaped The World Of Conspiracy Theories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8YaBWN4yuE Before that he was probably somebody who believed he was a health risk for stepping on a bus without wearing a mask despite borders being open and no other caps or limits in place, in a country with vaccination rates over 95% Not on a bus but that's very likely how I caught it mate. I was even outdoors. Right and from what I read you and your family did quite well because you were all vaccinated. You also caught it despite following all face mask regulations which highlights how fruitless they were There have been 3.15m cases reported in Australia and well over 80% would have been through work places, households or shared facilities. Having mask laws for just public transport seems odd, especially given the substantial evidence that masks are ineffective against the latest variants If there is no end date on mask laws for public transport it will just be an indefinite law that some people obey and some dont. I cant see a time where health officials will say they are no longer required given the obvious stake they have in them. If Covid rules are reviewed regularly then I'm at an absolute loss how any rational response team with the interests in moving away from restrictions will see public transport as a high risk area worth targetting This is the kind of thing that needs to be made public for scrutiny. I'd like to see what modelling says masks on public transport is what is keeping Australia from being overwhelmed with cases Agree. Would love to see all the medical advice and modelling given throughout the pandemic. Government should be open about this. I agree but most people don't know how to interpret the models correctly, bluebird especially would be bad at this. It's up to the experts to explain this clearly to people. If you can't explain it clearly, then you need to do better and perhaps you're not that much of an expert :) I also think full disclosure on some of this would highlight the inconsistency in certain Government decisions (some of which I believe is not based on medical advice, but commercial). I work in open data and am definitely a supporter of having this sort of information out there in the public domain. However you have to be realistic, there are hard facts out there now that are publicly accessible (such as covid death stats) that are interpreted completely wrongly either because the person isn't capable of it or even worse they have nefarious motives to push a narrative. Modelling is even more complex to understand. I work in data and analysis also. The difference is I dont analyse data independently of its meaning. Its not enough to draw a straight line between two points and make predictions based on growth patterns. Every single instance of an outbreak we have seen globally has been a wave pattern. Yet epidemiologists continue to provide predictions based on linear and indefinite growth. They also work with state averages independent of geographical and social trends. They put a lot of meaning in the r figure which is a product of the data instead of a driver of it In fact when you have a look at the modelling they do release and read the assumptions and limitations, you'd laugh your ass off. The modelling is used for no reason other than to support the recommendations. Its the classic start with the answer then look for information to support it. They also write their own narrative and make definitive conclusions before they even see the data, and declare success regularly based on specious reasoning Every model in Australia has been radically wrong. Not just a little bit. Not by a reasonable amount. But completely and utterly wrong. Just like how they predicted a surge of cases when kids went back to school. I mean kids were in a bubble during the 6-7 week long break when this thing was running rampant. Kids go to school, spread diseases, and then come home and kill their grand parents I've put my predictions based on how I see things on the forum time and time again. Like how we wouldn't see 6000 cases in October in NSW or how we would see 25k-40k cases a day when we open up despite over 90% vaccinations. I havent been 100% right, but a hell of a lot closer than the leading experts. And I dont have a break down of the data like they do. Just the snippets published here or there. Nor do I have any medical degrees either If you're in the data game then you of all people should understand the importance of using the data to reach a conclusion. No matter what your wants, needs, hidden agendas, biases, prejudices are, or past claims. Whatever the data says, thats what you go with. If I saw evidence that face masks made a difference, even today, I would be asking for wide spread face mask usage Australia taking a statistical approach to this virus instead of using infectious disease experts and behavioural scientists has been its biggest weakness  That was the literal point I was making. Only one of us believes face masks on buses is the only thing keeping old people alive I'll go with the experts on this one
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xfirst class interview from Waleed Aly this shows the chilling cult of conspiracy and someone who managed to break away from it The Freedom Fighter Who Escaped The World Of Conspiracy Theories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8YaBWN4yuE Before that he was probably somebody who believed he was a health risk for stepping on a bus without wearing a mask despite borders being open and no other caps or limits in place, in a country with vaccination rates over 95% Not on a bus but that's very likely how I caught it mate. I was even outdoors. Right and from what I read you and your family did quite well because you were all vaccinated. You also caught it despite following all face mask regulations which highlights how fruitless they were There have been 3.15m cases reported in Australia and well over 80% would have been through work places, households or shared facilities. Having mask laws for just public transport seems odd, especially given the substantial evidence that masks are ineffective against the latest variants If there is no end date on mask laws for public transport it will just be an indefinite law that some people obey and some dont. I cant see a time where health officials will say they are no longer required given the obvious stake they have in them. If Covid rules are reviewed regularly then I'm at an absolute loss how any rational response team with the interests in moving away from restrictions will see public transport as a high risk area worth targetting This is the kind of thing that needs to be made public for scrutiny. I'd like to see what modelling says masks on public transport is what is keeping Australia from being overwhelmed with cases Agree. Would love to see all the medical advice and modelling given throughout the pandemic. Government should be open about this. I agree but most people don't know how to interpret the models correctly, bluebird especially would be bad at this. It's up to the experts to explain this clearly to people. If you can't explain it clearly, then you need to do better and perhaps you're not that much of an expert :) I also think full disclosure on some of this would highlight the inconsistency in certain Government decisions (some of which I believe is not based on medical advice, but commercial). I work in open data and am definitely a supporter of having this sort of information out there in the public domain. However you have to be realistic, there are hard facts out there now that are publicly accessible (such as covid death stats) that are interpreted completely wrongly either because the person isn't capable of it or even worse they have nefarious motives to push a narrative. Modelling is even more complex to understand. I work in data and analysis also. The difference is I dont analyse data independently of its meaning. Its not enough to draw a straight line between two points and make predictions based on growth patterns. Every single instance of an outbreak we have seen globally has been a wave pattern. Yet epidemiologists continue to provide predictions based on linear and indefinite growth. They also work with state averages independent of geographical and social trends. They put a lot of meaning in the r figure which is a product of the data instead of a driver of it In fact when you have a look at the modelling they do release and read the assumptions and limitations, you'd laugh your ass off. The modelling is used for no reason other than to support the recommendations. Its the classic start with the answer then look for information to support it. They also write their own narrative and make definitive conclusions before they even see the data, and declare success regularly based on specious reasoning Every model in Australia has been radically wrong. Not just a little bit. Not by a reasonable amount. But completely and utterly wrong. Just like how they predicted a surge of cases when kids went back to school. I mean kids were in a bubble during the 6-7 week long break when this thing was running rampant. Kids go to school, spread diseases, and then come home and kill their grand parents I've put my predictions based on how I see things on the forum time and time again. Like how we wouldn't see 6000 cases in October in NSW or how we would see 25k-40k cases a day when we open up despite over 90% vaccinations. I havent been 100% right, but a hell of a lot closer than the leading experts. And I dont have a break down of the data like they do. Just the snippets published here or there. Nor do I have any medical degrees either If you're in the data game then you of all people should understand the importance of using the data to reach a conclusion. No matter what your wants, needs, hidden agendas, biases, prejudices are, or past claims. Whatever the data says, thats what you go with. If I saw evidence that face masks made a difference, even today, I would be asking for wide spread face mask usage Australia taking a statistical approach to this virus instead of using infectious disease experts and behavioural scientists has been its biggest weakness  That was the literal point I was making. Only one of us believes face masks on buses is the only thing keeping old people alive I'll go with the experts on this one As will hopefully a lot of people in Australia. No sense in a situation where too many people are questioning or second guessing health advice Really highlights the importance of communicating only critical advice thats fundamental to the success of controlling the outbreak and keeping vulnerable people safe. Right now in Australia the risk of entering public transport is the same high risk setting as entering a hospital or aged care facility, for all forms, all regions, right across Australia Wasnt the case for NSW in June 2021, or a lot of the non Victoria parts of the country. But the pandemic can turn overnight and the rules are always different. Right now public transport is just too dangerous. As for when this is no longer the case, given the total lack of transparency, we'll just have to wait for the experts to tell us when buses are safe again
|
|
|
Butler99
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
Is the COVID over now ??
Had a 2 day head cold and a bit of fever. Kind of like a bad hangover. Feel much better now.
Lucky I had my 18 vaccines recently to help me get through this
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
Lol I cant find the article anymore but the CHO from Queensland said along the lines that restrictions by law is something he takes seriously and will never be implemented unless there was a link to hospitalisations. Yet there are laws in place today prohibiting anybody in Queensland from using public transport without wearing a mask. No explanation. No review. No end date Expert epidemiologists have already released their "winter surge" models as I predicted so expect face masks indoors soon until at least October SA's new premier said on day 1 he's going to back health advice so we know what that means for them also If there was a proven link between covid deaths and smoking, and health officials were able to make smoking illegal during a wave. I can guarentee you that "wave" will never end and there will never be a time where health officials say "its OK to smoke again". There is too much self interest tied up in these health restrictions that have gone beyond just preventing Covid This is a health response, not a Covid response. And as long as health officials are running the country it will never be over. Not this year, not the next either
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Cases increasing. 1000s of Australians still being hospitalised by it even before the increase, many still in ICU. COVID is far from over. Pretty simple.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+xCases increasing. 1000s of Australians still being hospitalised by it even before the increase, many still in ICU. COVID is far from over. Pretty simple. Thats right. This is a long term problem for hospitals and aged care facilities. It wont be over today, tomorrow, next month, or even next year So why are response teams continuing to target public transport and schools? Why are they targeting pubs, clubs, singing and dancing? Why are they insistent on wearing people down with pointless B Grade restrictions to ensure compliance levels are next to nothing when there is a large scale problem? Today the SA premier shut down talks of ending school a week early. Why were there talks of any seriousness worth publicly acknowledging? There arent thousands of people in hospital. There is over 1000 people in hospital. Significantly less than the outbreak at the end of last year. As are case numbers and that was before they were fudged with rubbish RAT data Nothing is going to change after this mass panic just like nothing changed before the last one or the one after. This new wave of restrictions doesnt end the problem. When we get to October and people can finally go outside without wearing a mask it wont be for the last time We have reached a stage where the damage done by the response is worse than the damage by not having a response (outside of hospitals and aged care). It has accomplished absolutely nothing of substance. Only fact less speculation stemming from predictions that have been way off
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
Looks like SA has ben brought into line with interstate at least. Masks to be gone April 14 (we shall see aha)
Channel 7 mentions you don't have to wear them at Adelaide Oval anymore (being outdoors) Doesn't mention Hindmarsh but going to assume it will apply there too and Channel 7 just don't wanna mention soccer aha.
|
|
|
cesspit
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 357,
Visits: 0
|
+xLooks like SA has ben brought into line with interstate at least. Masks to be gone April 14 (we shall see aha) Channel 7 mentions you don't have to wear them at Adelaide Oval anymore (being outdoors) Doesn't mention Hindmarsh but going to assume it will apply there too and Channel 7 just don't wanna mention soccer aha. as long as the vaccination requirement is kept at these venues, mask restrictions may be relaxed
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
Face masks arent going in SA, they are just planning on relaxing them. At a minimum you'll most likely still need them on all forms of public / shared transport Then there are the specifics that states want, such as Victoria has them for primary schools, retail / hospitality workers. SA will have them for entering / exiting venues https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-25/sa-changes-covid-close-contact-and-isolation-rules/100939052There is still a strong push by health officials to get them back for all indoors during winter so it will be a short lived reprieve either way BTW: Today is day 600 of consecutive face mask laws for all of Victoria. I dont mean hospitals, aged care or the federal airport directive (which is indefinite). I mean some kind of law prohibiting the general public from moving about or working without a mask. At best it has been public transport, at worst it has been for all places outside of your immediate household. Has to be a global record and its unlikely we're even halfway
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
It's going to be quite an interesting experiment coming up in SA (and I think most other local jurisdictions) this winter. Hope it goes well but it's a departure from what for the most part has been a successful strategy (no not talking about COVID zero strategies, I'm talking about efforts to reduce hospitalisations and deaths).
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+xo get them back for all indoors during winter so it will be a short lived reprieve either way BTW: Today is day 600 of consecutive face mask laws for all of Victoria. I dont mean hospitals, aged care or the federal airport directive (which is indefinite). I mean some kind of law prohibiting the general public from moving about or working without a mask. At best it has been public transport, at worst it has been for all places outside of your immediate household. Has to be a global record and its unlikely we're even halfway What? Who wears a mask?
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xo get them back for all indoors during winter so it will be a short lived reprieve either way BTW: Today is day 600 of consecutive face mask laws for all of Victoria. I dont mean hospitals, aged care or the federal airport directive (which is indefinite). I mean some kind of law prohibiting the general public from moving about or working without a mask. At best it has been public transport, at worst it has been for all places outside of your immediate household. Has to be a global record and its unlikely we're even halfway What? Who wears a mask? In Victoria: You must wear a mask indoors in the following settings, unless an exemption applies: . on public transport, in taxis and rideshare, on planes, and indoors at an airport . working or visiting hospitals, and indoor areas at care facilities . working in hospitality, retail and the court system . working at justice and correctional facilities . for students in year 3 or above at primary school, and workers at early childhood centres and primary schools (masks can be removed in secondary school) . working indoors at an event with more than 30,000 people attending . if you have COVID-19 or are a close contact and you’re leaving home Not sure if they are still required for meat processing as that was one of the industries targeted a while ago By the way: Where are those cases everybody was predicting? Even with cases inflated by RAT data (donald duck and mickey mouse) they are significantly lower than what modelling predicted The predictions and models are so embarrassingly wrong that its puzzling why they are being used to impose laws and impact on day to day life. Australia's vaccination has long put it in a good position to move to a reactive strategy like the rest of the world instead of a sensationalised predictive one. Can't get restrictions imposed that way unfortunately
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xo get them back for all indoors during winter so it will be a short lived reprieve either way BTW: Today is day 600 of consecutive face mask laws for all of Victoria. I dont mean hospitals, aged care or the federal airport directive (which is indefinite). I mean some kind of law prohibiting the general public from moving about or working without a mask. At best it has been public transport, at worst it has been for all places outside of your immediate household. Has to be a global record and its unlikely we're even halfway What? Who wears a mask? In Victoria: You must wear a mask indoors in the following settings, unless an exemption applies: . on public transport, in taxis and rideshare, on planes, and indoors at an airport . working or visiting hospitals, and indoor areas at care facilities . working in hospitality, retail and the court system . working at justice and correctional facilities . for students in year 3 or above at primary school, and workers at early childhood centres and primary schools (masks can be removed in secondary school) . working indoors at an event with more than 30,000 people attending . if you have COVID-19 or are a close contact and you’re leaving home So nobody in an office, eating out, bars, nightclubs or shopping...or basically most things really. I wore a mask on a plane a few weeks ago, that's only time I can remember in a month or two. Maybe in an uber too
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xo get them back for all indoors during winter so it will be a short lived reprieve either way BTW: Today is day 600 of consecutive face mask laws for all of Victoria. I dont mean hospitals, aged care or the federal airport directive (which is indefinite). I mean some kind of law prohibiting the general public from moving about or working without a mask. At best it has been public transport, at worst it has been for all places outside of your immediate household. Has to be a global record and its unlikely we're even halfway What? Who wears a mask? In Victoria: You must wear a mask indoors in the following settings, unless an exemption applies: . on public transport, in taxis and rideshare, on planes, and indoors at an airport . working or visiting hospitals, and indoor areas at care facilities . working in hospitality, retail and the court system . working at justice and correctional facilities . for students in year 3 or above at primary school, and workers at early childhood centres and primary schools (masks can be removed in secondary school) . working indoors at an event with more than 30,000 people attending . if you have COVID-19 or are a close contact and you’re leaving home So nobody in an office, eating out, bars, nightclubs or shopping...or basically most things really. I wore a mask on a plane a few weeks ago, that's only time I can remember in a month or two. Maybe in an uber too Thats right. So explain to me why its illegal to not wear a mask in these situations in the scheme of things. Explain how buses, primary schools and just the workers in hospitality wearing masks is what is keeping old people alive This isnt a recommendation, it is legislation. And it might not impact you, but that doesn't mean it isnt a problem The other things you mentioned will come this winter. Epidemiologists have already predicted it Every time there is a disaster or tragedy people turn to Nostradamus to see if the great purple fire breathing dragon on the mountain side sketching the landscape relates to it. And to be honest I find it much much more credible than epidemiologists declaring there will be a deadly uncontrollable wave, 2 weeks later predicting we are in one, rolling out a few tokenistic face mask laws, and then patting themselves on the back for their success Here are a few facts: 1/ We have reached the limits of our vaccine coverage 2/ Due to timing and logistics there will always be a 3-4 month lag in our booster program 3/ This will not be over this year, and it will not be over next year, and maybe even not the year after The current system means Australia is going to be a face mask country and it is illegal for primary school kids to get an education without wearing them, and illegal to use public transport without them, and illegal for some workers to not wear them, and the pub / clubs / events industry are constantly going to be shut down Once Australia reaches a stage where it can no longer justify B grade restrictions as part of its response then we have moved past our 2020 response. Until then its easy to see why the public has lost faith
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
It's illegal to swear as well. Seriously, who cares? Nobody wears a mask anywhere
I like that people have to wear them on a plane. Don't have filthy pricks coughing all over me. I haven't had a cold for two years touch wood
Do u have kids? I have two little ones. Nobody seems to give a fuck. If I was a teacher I'd maybe want the filthy little farkers to not putting snot all over me.
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+xIt's illegal to swear as well. Seriously, who cares? Nobody wears a mask anywhere I like that people have to wear them on a plane. Don't have filthy pricks coughing all over me. I haven't had a cold for two years touch wood Do u have kids? I have two little ones. Nobody seems to give a fuck. If I was a teacher I'd maybe want the filthy little farkers to not putting snot all over me. Thats right. It will become one of those rules that nobody follows so where is the point in that. I'd argue most of the restrictions in place have overstayed their welcome which means if we ever have a real outbreak we're screwed. Having the majority of the population ignoring a national health directive is not a good thing As for schools - education behind a face mask is entirely inefficient. Why is your concern kids might spread the virus greater than your concern that 3 years of every child's education is nullified? If teacher's dont want to get sick then they should resign and move into one of those careers where its impossible to catch Covid This rolling over of restrictions from month to month might be a barrel of laughs for all involved but it is inefficient and unsustainable. This is a 5 to 10 year problem at its shortest. Sooner or later states will start to draft legislation to manage this virus as an ongoing safety issue like seatbelts or airbags. The way hospitals and aged care facilities operate will change forever. And I'd be willing to bet health officials will staple to that their pointless face mask laws we have had to endure simply because there wasn't enough resistance and the ease in which they were able to get them across the line I'm not sure I agree with your attitude that its OK because people can just pick and choose what laws to follow anyhow
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/mask-mandate-to-be-dropped-in-south-australia-as-qr-codes-mothballed/ar-AAW7ca3South Australians will be spared from wearing masks in most public indoor spaces from Good Friday, while the state's QR code check-in regime will be "mothballed".
Masks will still be required in high-risk settings like hospitals, aged care or residential disability facilities, on public transport and in ride-sharing vehicles.
Premier Peter Malinauskas said the changes would bring South Australia into line with most other states.
QR code check-ins had already been abandoned in some areas including shops, taxis, rideshare and home inspections.
They will now only be required in a few high-risk facilities. Lol. So public transport declared high risk to get mask laws over the line, but declared low risk to do away with QR codes Man Ray: Does public transport meet contact definition rules? Patrick: No Man Ray: Does public transport meet high risk rules for QR codes? Patrick: No Man Ray: Then public transport can't be high risk Patrick: That makes sense Man Ray: Then we shouldn't be fining people for using public transport without wearing a mask Patrick: We need mask laws on public transport otherwise hospital systems will be overrun because its a high risk setting
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xhttps://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/mask-mandate-to-be-dropped-in-south-australia-as-qr-codes-mothballed/ar-AAW7ca3South Australians will be spared from wearing masks in most public indoor spaces from Good Friday, while the state's QR code check-in regime will be "mothballed".
Masks will still be required in high-risk settings like hospitals, aged care or residential disability facilities, on public transport and in ride-sharing vehicles.
Premier Peter Malinauskas said the changes would bring South Australia into line with most other states.
QR code check-ins had already been abandoned in some areas including shops, taxis, rideshare and home inspections.
They will now only be required in a few high-risk facilities. Lol. So public transport declared high risk to get mask laws over the line, but declared low risk to do away with QR codes Man Ray: Does public transport meet contact definition rules? Patrick: No Man Ray: Does public transport meet high risk rules for QR codes? Patrick: No Man Ray: Then public transport can't be high risk Patrick: That makes sense How feasible contact tracing is in a setting has no bearing on how high risk a setting is regarding infection 🙄 It's not that complicated my friend.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xhttps://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/mask-mandate-to-be-dropped-in-south-australia-as-qr-codes-mothballed/ar-AAW7ca3South Australians will be spared from wearing masks in most public indoor spaces from Good Friday, while the state's QR code check-in regime will be "mothballed".
Masks will still be required in high-risk settings like hospitals, aged care or residential disability facilities, on public transport and in ride-sharing vehicles.
Premier Peter Malinauskas said the changes would bring South Australia into line with most other states.
QR code check-ins had already been abandoned in some areas including shops, taxis, rideshare and home inspections.
They will now only be required in a few high-risk facilities. Lol. So public transport declared high risk to get mask laws over the line, but declared low risk to do away with QR codes Man Ray: Does public transport meet contact definition rules? Patrick: No Man Ray: Does public transport meet high risk rules for QR codes? Patrick: No Man Ray: Then public transport can't be high risk Patrick: That makes sense How feasible contact tracing is in a setting has no bearing on how high risk a setting is regarding infection 🙄 It's not that complicated my friend. That still doesnt explain why public transport is being declared a high risk setting alongside aged care and hospitals, but nothing else is. Like seriously, open work place, private gatherings of hundreds, weddings, funerals, major events - but you get a fine if you go on a bus without a mask John Smith could come back into this thread and type the single line of "we shouldnt have mask laws on public transport" and suddenly he and most of this forum will be 1 - 1 Why are you defending something so laughable?
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
I past they brought mask rules onto the Epping train line thirty years ago.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
*wish not past
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+xI wish they brought mask rules onto the Epping train line thirty years ago. Thats right. Face masks arent anything new. Asian countries use them all the time on public transport, supermarkets, and even indoors when they are unwell. Australia doesnt This is just a means to force by law what other countries do by choice. The difference is in other countries they dont work on the assumption that every single person in the country is sick, therefore every single person at all times needs to wear a mask in these specific situations The ferocity and aggression in which health officials have tried to mandate masks, and continue to, is astonishing Oh, and where were these 10,000 - 20,000 cases that these psychics predicted SA were going to get that justified keeping laws in place? Wow, wouldn't you believe it another failed prediction but that didnt stop a real impact on the public. Hasn't stopped a new wave of predictions by epidemiologists screaming for more mask laws Australia failed to adopt the national framework of keep the vulnerable safe and treat this like any other infectious disease. Now we're stuck with a hybrid hysterical approach of restrictions waves based on random predictions, mixed with obvious self interest, and have to endure it until this virus is over. And that's only a few more weeks right?
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
What's the problem with it? Is it such a massive issue?
I hate the government and overreach with our nanny state but I just don't see a problem here. It's hygenic. You have three seats side by side with three facing on a train in one arrangement that are chockas in peak hour. If one has covid or a cold theres a chance you all will by end of the trip
|
|
|