Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xEven though he is anti AFL, "Brian Kidd" is becoming a rather unpleasant troll. Should be banned. Like with any user and/or posts, use the report button if you believe anything requires moderation. Nobody in their right mind would report another user. Plenty of forumers have pissed me off mightily but you'd be a soft cock wanker to go dobbing them in. (With some rare exceptions.) So you'd be happy for mods to ban users without community input? No actually. Banning should be the very last resort and usually (back in the day anyway) bans that were handed out by the mod team were met with a 'yeah, saw that coming' because it was at the arse end of a lot of shit posting. This forum has been much improved since the days of tools spamming and harassing all and sundry but the side effect of that it's nowhere near as much fun as it used to be. Forums need to be a bit anarchic. Which, self evidently, this one isn't. I thought about this some more. In my opinion, the forum in its current form is the most anarchic and least moderated it has been in my memory of it existing. The current mod team act on very little, and let most things play on - most of what we do act on, I believe is in conjunction with community input. The fact that certain former users have left, the place is less eventful now, etc is almost definitely a major player in why there is less to moderate, but I truthfully believe if/when the place goes back to being the vibrant place it once was, this current mod team would be far less hands on and within reason let the forum be a bit anarchic like you say. Besides libel who else is shit stirring? AJF mainly known as Edude/Sevan is a good chance for Libel. Miles off, but can understand you being obsessed with Edude/Sevan, man did they burn you on FA. Muting you showed I had no interest in what you post whatsoever. Ditto others I muted. The only problem in muting a few stalkers was I wasn't reading all the misinformation being spread about me. It is so hypocritical for you to label me as a multi, Edude/Sevan. You are a pseudo-anonymous, non-entity on the internet, who has no relevance in my life, other than stalking me on and off forums, for some weird reason. You need to get a life off the interweb. Like most, the only reason I visit this forum is football discussion, and , up until recently cricket. All other interests are well catered for in face to face discussion with mates. To prove it, I'll happily respond to none of your future posts on this forum. So if you don't constantly try to troll and derail threads that I post in with multi accusations and fabrications about my coaching career and qualifications, I'm quite happy to respond to nothing you post. Can you do the same - completely leave anything I post devoid of your response? And anything I post that transgresses forum rules on FTBL Forum, please inform the Mod panel. I'm very happy to post in a civil way to bona fide football fans posting earnestly about football.
|
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xEven though he is anti AFL, "Brian Kidd" is becoming a rather unpleasant troll. Should be banned. Like with any user and/or posts, use the report button if you believe anything requires moderation. Nobody in their right mind would report another user. Plenty of forumers have pissed me off mightily but you'd be a soft cock wanker to go dobbing them in. (With some rare exceptions.) So you'd be happy for mods to ban users without community input? No actually. Banning should be the very last resort and usually (back in the day anyway) bans that were handed out by the mod team were met with a 'yeah, saw that coming' because it was at the arse end of a lot of shit posting. This forum has been much improved since the days of tools spamming and harassing all and sundry but the side effect of that it's nowhere near as much fun as it used to be. Forums need to be a bit anarchic. Which, self evidently, this one isn't. I thought about this some more. In my opinion, the forum in its current form is the most anarchic and least moderated it has been in my memory of it existing. The current mod team act on very little, and let most things play on - most of what we do act on, I believe is in conjunction with community input. The fact that certain former users have left, the place is less eventful now, etc is almost definitely a major player in why there is less to moderate, but I truthfully believe if/when the place goes back to being the vibrant place it once was, this current mod team would be far less hands on and within reason let the forum be a bit anarchic like you say. Besides libel who else is shit stirring? AJF mainly known as Edude/Sevan is a good chance for Libel. Miles off, but can understand you being obsessed with Edude/Sevan, man did they burn you on FA. I understand you are upset because I exposed your fake KNVB qualifications (you know the 4 day course with 4v4 tournament and no recognition that took you 8 days to do in 2008) but your unhinged ranting really is getting out of control, could be the basis of a thesis for any budding psychologists out there. Because you can't deconstruct contemporaneous coaching methodology, you report to personal attacks and spreading misinformation, like me being multis I'm not, And yet here you are admitting to creating one of the most disgusting multi's ever seen on FA
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xEven though he is anti AFL, "Brian Kidd" is becoming a rather unpleasant troll. Should be banned. Like with any user and/or posts, use the report button if you believe anything requires moderation. Nobody in their right mind would report another user. Plenty of forumers have pissed me off mightily but you'd be a soft cock wanker to go dobbing them in. (With some rare exceptions.) So you'd be happy for mods to ban users without community input? No actually. Banning should be the very last resort and usually (back in the day anyway) bans that were handed out by the mod team were met with a 'yeah, saw that coming' because it was at the arse end of a lot of shit posting. This forum has been much improved since the days of tools spamming and harassing all and sundry but the side effect of that it's nowhere near as much fun as it used to be. Forums need to be a bit anarchic. Which, self evidently, this one isn't. I thought about this some more. In my opinion, the forum in its current form is the most anarchic and least moderated it has been in my memory of it existing. The current mod team act on very little, and let most things play on - most of what we do act on, I believe is in conjunction with community input. The fact that certain former users have left, the place is less eventful now, etc is almost definitely a major player in why there is less to moderate, but I truthfully believe if/when the place goes back to being the vibrant place it once was, this current mod team would be far less hands on and within reason let the forum be a bit anarchic like you say. Besides libel who else is shit stirring? AJF mainly known as Edude/Sevan is a good chance for Libel. Miles off, but can understand you being obsessed with Edude/Sevan, man did they burn you on FA. I understand you are upset because I exposed your fake KNVB qualifications (you know the 4 day course with 4v4 tournament and no recognition that took you 8 days to do in 2008) but your unhinged ranting really is getting out of control, could be the basis of a thesis for any budding psychologists out there. Because you can't deconstruct contemporaneous coaching methodology, you report to personal attacks and spreading misinformation, like me being multis I'm not, And yet here you are admitting to creating one of the most disgusting multi's ever seen on FA If you own the Anarchy Football Forum, if any poster transgressed rules, why did you fail to ban them, rather than bringing attention seeking immaterial content to this site? You also set up multis on Anarchy Forum, your own site, masquerading as Decentric and other posters!
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
None of the mods really want to lock this thread but we may be forced to if this rubbish continues. Take your beef back to the forum it originated from.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xEven though he is anti AFL, "Brian Kidd" is becoming a rather unpleasant troll. Should be banned. Like with any user and/or posts, use the report button if you believe anything requires moderation. Nobody in their right mind would report another user. Plenty of forumers have pissed me off mightily but you'd be a soft cock wanker to go dobbing them in. (With some rare exceptions.) So you'd be happy for mods to ban users without community input? No actually. Banning should be the very last resort and usually (back in the day anyway) bans that were handed out by the mod team were met with a 'yeah, saw that coming' because it was at the arse end of a lot of shit posting. This forum has been much improved since the days of tools spamming and harassing all and sundry but the side effect of that it's nowhere near as much fun as it used to be. Forums need to be a bit anarchic. Which, self evidently, this one isn't. I thought about this some more. In my opinion, the forum in its current form is the most anarchic and least moderated it has been in my memory of it existing. The current mod team act on very little, and let most things play on - most of what we do act on, I believe is in conjunction with community input. The fact that certain former users have left, the place is less eventful now, etc is almost definitely a major player in why there is less to moderate, but I truthfully believe if/when the place goes back to being the vibrant place it once was, this current mod team would be far less hands on and within reason let the forum be a bit anarchic like you say. Besides libel who else is shit stirring? AJF mainly known as Edude/Sevan is a good chance for Libel. Miles off, but can understand you being obsessed with Edude/Sevan, man did they burn you on FA. I understand you are upset because I exposed your fake KNVB qualifications (you know the 4 day course with 4v4 tournament and no recognition that took you 8 days to do in 2008) but your unhinged ranting really is getting out of control, could be the basis of a thesis for any budding psychologists out there. Because you can't deconstruct contemporaneous coaching methodology, you report to personal attacks and spreading misinformation, like me being multis I'm not, And yet here you are admitting to creating one of the most disgusting multi's ever seen on FA If you own the Anarchy Football Forum, if any poster transgressed rules, why did you fail to ban them, rather than bringing attention seeking immaterial content to this site? You also set up multis on Anarchy Forum, your own site, masquerading as Decentric and other posters! Your lunacy knows no bounds, unfortunately you have carried the same insane behavior from FA to here and so it is relevant for posters here to see what you are really like. Also pretty sure you were banned from TWG forum for your bad behavior, true?
|