NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Not a bad shout to be honest. When you're playing for game styles/tactics/etc (like Ange), club game suits better, you can find what you need to fit your plan. International games are much different because you're pretty much stuck with what you have. Credit to Arnie trying that though looking through Scotland.
|
|
|
|
mark_000au
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAll with emotion now. Fox Sports gave Behich a 4. Certainly did well in attack. Where in earth was Maclaren? Hrustic not fit all tournament. A wasted spot. Who bloody knows if Rogic event wants or or is even liked by the group. The same goes for a lot of players not there. Some errors in that Baccus was perfectly fit and should've stayed on. I think Devlin's engine and muscle would've been useful. Hrustic even when fit still couldn't dibble past anyone. Slow pace and decision making. Ryan was dissapointed...only if we have that Poland keeper it might be a different outcome. The rest was fighting like warriors. They gave their all.
|
|
|
clockwork orange
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball. For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. This^ That is one thing that Arnie has over Ange and why he is a better NT manager, where you need to make do with what you have. 100%. But is THIS how we want the team to play because we've had it as far as I can remember, since the 1980's Personally, I think the whole idea of trying to create a ‘national playing style’ is bollocks. We should be focusing on trying to create the best, most skilled players. If we have more skilful players, the NT coach can obviously play a different style of play than what Arnold could play with this squad. The NT manager’s sole job is to get the best results he can, with the players he has, not to play in any particular style.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) Don't get me wrong- I agree with how Arnold did it, given the players he had to play with. Foster said:" We should learn from this". What will we learn that we didn't know?
|
|
|
playmaker11
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
Hrustic was fuming after Behich tried shooting instead of laying it off. Understandable.. Maclaren would've needed to keep his wits, but a very possible 2-2 there. One of those "ifs" that I'll think about for days to come. Good block by the Argentinian defender though. https://i.imgur.com/wZMFOy5.mp4
By now, American Samoa must have realised that Australias 22-0 win over Tonga two days earlier was no fluke.
|
|
|
riquelmes_laces
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 401,
Visits: 0
|
+xHrustic was fuming after Behich tried shooting instead of laying it off. Understandable.. Maclaren would've needed to keep his wits, but a very possible 2-2 there. One of those "ifs" that I'll think about for days to come. Good block by the Argentinian defender though. https://i.imgur.com/wZMFOy5.mp4 Hrustic fumed at Kuol as well for not laying off his chance, I don't think that was fair.
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xHrustic was fuming after Behich tried shooting instead of laying it off. Understandable.. Maclaren would've needed to keep his wits, but a very possible 2-2 there. One of those "ifs" that I'll think about for days to come. Good block by the Argentinian defender though. https://i.imgur.com/wZMFOy5.mp4 Hrustic fumed at Kuol as well for not laying off his chance, I don't think that was fair. That was weird. Kuol couldn't even see him.
|
|
|
clockwork orange
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) We are doing something wrong. Every Argentinian player is better on the ball than every Socceroo. Why is this? It is not because of the way we structure youth teams or competitions. It’s because of what we value in young individual players and how we coach their individual skills.
|
|
|
Derider
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xHrustic was fuming after Behich tried shooting instead of laying it off. Understandable.. Maclaren would've needed to keep his wits, but a very possible 2-2 there. One of those "ifs" that I'll think about for days to come. Good block by the Argentinian defender though. https://i.imgur.com/wZMFOy5.mp4 Nah he had to shoot there. MacLaren was covered. The defender only committed to Behich at the last possible moment. It was a beautifully timed block.
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) Don't get me wrong- I agree with how Arnold did it, given the players he had to play with. Foster said:" We should learn from this". What will we learn that we didn't know? Oh and also those possession stats are new. You need to had on half the disputes posession to get to the true figure we have known in the past. I do agree in principle though don’t worry
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSome of you really need to get with the times. We have to keep playing it out. All the serious sides do it. Booting it downfield just gives the ball back to the other team 90% of the time. Yes, embarrassing mistakes like that happen from time to time, but let's not go back to the 80s pls. And let's not forget that playing it out allowed us to get a foothold in the first half. Agree thats the problem we have, we look playing out from the back wrongly as a bad part of the curriculum when its norm used all over the world especially the top level. Behich and Rowles could have done better. To be honest I dont Ryan had a great game but I feel people will victimise him for that.
|
|
|
flat_eric
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 327,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xReminds me of 06 who would think a neill mistake would be the difference then. Who would think a ryan mistake in distribution would be the difference today. Salute to ryan, been a star with his distribution for a decade and made some key saves In 2006 I felt sick in the stomach. In 2022 I feel pride. +x- the "1" was pure luck, and kind of embarrassing
- Argentina should have had, at least, two more
- one of the "2" was a keeper howler
- we parked the bus for the first hour
- only Licki's fluke got us into the knock-out game -- definitely no 2006 ver.2.0
- we were hopeless against France Republic of Africa
- Arnold's "lob it in and hope" strategies leave a lot to be desired
- we have no strikers
- Mooy will retire
- Ryan should be banned
Must be a real sad existence being this guy. That was an incredible game to cap off an incredible tournament for our over achievers. It united an entire country in a way I never expected. I believe it will provide the shot in the arm Australian football has been waiting for.
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+xHrustic was fuming after Behich tried shooting instead of laying it off. Understandable.. Maclaren would've needed to keep his wits, but a very possible 2-2 there. One of those "ifs" that I'll think about for days to come. Good block by the Argentinian defender though. https://i.imgur.com/wZMFOy5.mp4 Yeah I was shouting to pass. Had his head well down
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xHrustic was fuming after Behich tried shooting instead of laying it off. Understandable.. Maclaren would've needed to keep his wits, but a very possible 2-2 there. One of those "ifs" that I'll think about for days to come. Good block by the Argentinian defender though. https://i.imgur.com/wZMFOy5.mp4 Hrustic fumed at Kuol as well for not laying off his chance, I don't think that was fair. Less fair but also he WAS free. Can’t really blame either of them in those positions though. Gotta back yourself.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) Don't get me wrong- I agree with how Arnold did it, given the players he had to play with. Foster said:" We should learn from this". What will we learn that we didn't know? Oh and also those possession stats are new. You need to had on half the disputes posession to get to the true figure we have known in the past. I do agree in principle though don’t worry The stats are from ESPN. Tunisa 58%, Aus 42%. linkDenmark 69% Aus 31%. link
|
|
|
jas88
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
so glad kuol got a chance, that missed chance at a goal will drive him for the next few years...
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
We got to be better on the ball no doubt but we dont have the quality to control games in a higher level hopefully it comes with time if we learn from it.
The key for me is how tactically mature they were on the pitch, each game they gave tactical problems to each team and 3 out of 4 games (I dont think Argentina played well and relied on a dead ball situation and a mistake from Ryan to beat us) that could not resolve. So huge credit should go to the coaching staff for getting them to a high level in a tactical sense, that's what you can do when you dont have alot with the ball which Australia had and take advantage of other things that you have to remain competitive.
We need to find a way to better on a technical level so we can more flexible with the ball, I felt they could so much but didnt have much to be more advanced like say the dutch who like Australia can tactically challenge teams but have the quality with the ball to hurt the best teams. A good example was that 20 pass goal they put against the USA, thats the next level for us.
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) Don't get me wrong- I agree with how Arnold did it, given the players he had to play with. Foster said:" We should learn from this". What will we learn that we didn't know? Oh and also those possession stats are new. You need to had on half the disputes posession to get to the true figure we have known in the past. I do agree in principle though don’t worry The stats are from ESPN. Tunisa 58%, Aus 42%. linkDenmark 69% Aus 31%. link Yeah I thought you were repeating the stats you quoted the other day
|
|
|
riquelmes_laces
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 401,
Visits: 0
|
+xso glad kuol got a chance, that missed chance at a goal will drive him for the next few years... Yep he will replay that moment in his mind for a long time.
These things can light a fire underneath a player.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) We are doing something wrong. Every Argentinian player is better on the ball than every Socceroo. Why is this? It is not because of the way we structure youth teams or competitions. It’s because of what we value in young individual players and how we coach their individual skills. To provide some context. Every Argentinian, or Brazilian, is possibly better on the ball than every player in any of the UEFA powerhouse international teams too. Maybe France and Spain are closer to them, but they are far better with close ball control than their domestic playing counterparts in the English, Italian and German leagues. Besides football being a religion in Argentina and Brazil , they also have a massive street football culture in these countries. Another facet of play compared to what I've recently identified as a problem in most UEFA teams, is that they select far too many tall players in any given team, apart from Portugal and Spain, and maybe the Netherlands. Argentina's shorter players with a lower centre of gravity, are more nimble on their feet, able to change direction more quickly, and can turn more quickly. Ditto Brazil. Two facets of first touch are to stop it dead, and , to turn away from the opponent as one simultaneously receives the ball. At least we select shorter players like Behich, Kuol and Maclaren. In a country like Australia where football is at best the 5th most popular sport behind AFL, league, union and cricket, we lose a much larger percentage of talented sportspersons to theses codes than nearly every other country in the World Cup. Plus there is virtually no money for youth development, because AFL takes most of the financial resources, trying to improve the standard for a sport nobody else plays in the world. Governments also put a lot money into Olympic sports too. Apologies to residents of NSW and the ACT. You probably have no idea how AFL enjoys its hegemony in the southern states that it does. Queensland is becoming an AFL state.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) We are doing something wrong. Every Argentinian player is better on the ball than every Socceroo. Why is this? It is not because of the way we structure youth teams or competitions. It’s because of what we value in young individual players and how we coach their individual skills. To provide some context. Every Argentinian, or Brazilian, is possibly better on the all than every player in any of the UEFA powerhouses too. Maybe France and Spain are closer to them, but they are far better with close ball control than their domestic playing counterparts in the English, Italian and German leagues. Besides football being a religion in Argentina and Brazil , they also have a massive street football culture in these countries. Another facet of play compared to what I've recently identified as a problem in most UEFA teams, is that they select far too many tall players in any given team, apart from Portugal and Spain, and maybe the Netherlands. Argentina's shorter players with a lower centre of gravity, are more nimble on their feet, able to change direction more quickly, and can turn more quickly. Ditto Brazil. Two facets of first touch are to stop it dead, and , to turn away from the opponent as one simultaneously receives the ball. At least we select shorter players like Behich, Kuol and Maclaren. In a country like Australia where football is at best the 5th most popular sport behind AFL, league, union and cricket, we lose a much larger percentage of talented sportspersons to theses codes than nearly every other country in the World Cup. Plus there is virtually no money for youth devotement, because AFL takes most of the financial resources, trying to improve the standard for a sport nobody else plays the world. Governments also put a lot money into Olympic sports too. Apologies to residents of NSW and the ACT. You probably have no idea how AFL enjoys its hegemony in the southern states that it does. Queensland is becoming an AFL state. No need to compare us to Sotuh America and EUFA. The Africans have a better first touch. The Saudi's have a better first touch. The Iranians have a better first touch. The Koreans and Japanese do as well. Why is it so hard for Australian players to develop a good first touch?
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xso glad kuol got a chance, that missed chance at a goal will drive him for the next few years... Yep he will replay that moment in his mind for a long time.
These things can light a fire underneath a player. Exactly I hope so. We all want our players to have the skills of the Argentinians. |Look at the way Kuol brought that ball down & beat the defender to create the chance, hopefully this is the players we are now starting to create.
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) We are doing something wrong. Every Argentinian player is better on the ball than every Socceroo. Why is this? It is not because of the way we structure youth teams or competitions. It’s because of what we value in young individual players and how we coach their individual skills. To provide some context. Every Argentinian, or Brazilian, is possibly better on the all than every player in any of the UEFA powerhouses too. Maybe France and Spain are closer to them, but they are far better with close ball control than their domestic playing counterparts in the English, Italian and German leagues. Besides football being a religion in Argentina and Brazil , they also have a massive street football culture in these countries. Another facet of play compared to what I've recently identified as a problem in most UEFA teams, is that they select far too many tall players in any given team, apart from Portugal and Spain, and maybe the Netherlands. Argentina's shorter players with a lower centre of gravity, are more nimble on their feet, able to change direction more quickly, and can turn more quickly. Ditto Brazil. Two facets of first touch are to stop it dead, and , to turn away from the opponent as one simultaneously receives the ball. At least we select shorter players like Behich, Kuol and Maclaren. In a country like Australia where football is at best the 5th most popular sport behind AFL, league, union and cricket, we lose a much larger percentage of talented sportspersons to theses codes than nearly every other country in the World Cup. Plus there is virtually no money for youth devotement, because AFL takes most of the financial resources, trying to improve the standard for a sport nobody else plays the world. Governments also put a lot money into Olympic sports too. Apologies to residents of NSW and the ACT. You probably have no idea how AFL enjoys its hegemony in the southern states that it does. Queensland is becoming an AFL state. That's the problem with Australia is their obsession with the provincial sport in AFL. If I would question the governments across Australia and the big business that invest in those sports and ask this, would the AFL touch the hearts and minds of all Australians the Socceroos could achieve within the space of 3 weeks? I haven't seen anything like it but this national team plus the Matildas represent the nation better than anyone but do the authorities know this? When will they wake up realise the potential football can do for the nation?
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
After looking at a replay and being disappointed with the style of football we played in Ball Possession against Denmark - too much long, high ball, and hoofball - the style of football we played in Ball Possession against Argentina was much, much better.
Having watched Socceroo games since 1973, it was the greatest ever performance today against Argentina. It was the best football played by the Socceroos in Ball Possession and BPO against one of the top international teams playing football.
We should be very proud of the Socceroos. This has been our best World Cup team ever, with most players in the team deserving to be in a best Socceroo team of all time, given the performances at this World Cup.
In Ball Possession Opposition today we were outstanding against a phenomenal Argentinian team when they had the ball.
Whilst in the past, at international level, Argentina used to back off the ball applying languid Squeezing, in Half Presses in Ball Possession Opposition, today they used intensive Squeezing, often in a Full Press - definitely for the first 25 mins. It was superbly coached and implemented. They also had the stamina to do it too. It made it very difficult for the Socceroos to maintain possession.
Although Argentina dropped the Press back to a 3/4 Press and Half Press later in the game and the Squeezing became more languid, they still maintained good defensive shape. Then we were able to circulate the ball more effectively, and maintain possession for sustained periods, whilst simultaneously building up from back to the front of the pitch.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) We are doing something wrong. Every Argentinian player is better on the ball than every Socceroo. Why is this? It is not because of the way we structure youth teams or competitions. It’s because of what we value in young individual players and how we coach their individual skills. To provide some context. Every Argentinian, or Brazilian, is possibly better on the all than every player in any of the UEFA powerhouses too. Maybe France and Spain are closer to them, but they are far better with close ball control than their domestic playing counterparts in the English, Italian and German leagues. Besides football being a religion in Argentina and Brazil , they also have a massive street football culture in these countries. Another facet of play compared to what I've recently identified as a problem in most UEFA teams, is that they select far too many tall players in any given team, apart from Portugal and Spain, and maybe the Netherlands. Argentina's shorter players with a lower centre of gravity, are more nimble on their feet, able to change direction more quickly, and can turn more quickly. Ditto Brazil. Two facets of first touch are to stop it dead, and , to turn away from the opponent as one simultaneously receives the ball. At least we select shorter players like Behich, Kuol and Maclaren. In a country like Australia where football is at best the 5th most popular sport behind AFL, league, union and cricket, we lose a much larger percentage of talented sportspersons to theses codes than nearly every other country in the World Cup. Plus there is virtually no money for youth devotement, because AFL takes most of the financial resources, trying to improve the standard for a sport nobody else plays the world. Governments also put a lot money into Olympic sports too. Apologies to residents of NSW and the ACT. You probably have no idea how AFL enjoys its hegemony in the southern states that it does. Queensland is becoming an AFL state. That's the problem with Australia is their obsession with the provincial sport in AFL. If I would question the governments across Australia and the big business that invest in those sports and ask this would the AFL touch the hearts and minds of all Australians the Socceroos could achieve within the space of 3 weeks? I have seen anything like it but this national team plus the Matildas represent the nation better than anyone but do the authorities know this? When will they wake up realise the potential football can do for the nation? People like you in NSW and the ACT, aren't completely overwhelmed with AFL, like we are in most other states, Barca. Since 2006 when football steadily built up a bigger profile and support, it went backwards after about 6 -8 years. Also, T20 cricket, basketball, women's AFL, have grasped the summer market. After the A L has been mocked from pillar to post, even by supposed Aussie football fans, at the 2022 World Cup, A L players, Goodwin, Leckie, Maclaren, Cummings, Kuol, Redmayne (bench), Vukovic (bench), have been members of the greatest Socceroo team of all time - including 2006. They were more successful than all the supposed club superstars playing for Belgium, Germany and Denmark, who breezed through UEFA WC qualification.
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) Don't get me wrong- I agree with how Arnold did it, given the players he had to play with. Foster said:" We should learn from this". What will we learn that we didn't know? I'm not talking about posters on here, but I reckon the average socceroos fan would not understand the true failing of the socceroos as you are attempting to describe. Our good WC performance, in fact, the best one in the history of the socceroos, does tend to paper over these obvious issues to do with touch, ball control in tight areas, working your way out of trouble with quick, deft one touch passing, etc. The top teams have it and the socceroos don't. In part, it's because we don't have players playing week in week out in the world's top leagues. You can't get this high level of playing unless the players are subject to it day to day.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan't fault the effort of the players, all tournament. Left it all out there in every game. Arnold got his tactics right too- Cede possession (because the players can't keep it even if they tried), and play on the counter. Craig Foster praised everyone and said we would learn from this. Judging by the comments here we've reset our football development expectations, away from possession football and playing out from the back to absorbing pressure and counter-attacking. Not sure what else we learned that we didn't already know. Excellent results though. I'm not so sure about this. I think many on here want Australia to aspire to dominate games with the ball.
For the first time in a while, I have seen us play to our strengths. We played with a sense of realism. Hopefully our strengths in the future will be a squad full of technical players coupled with the mentality we've showed this WC. Well if that's true, they're not saying so. Yes Arnold did play to our strength, our mentality. He did what he had to with the cattle he had. Always said he is a better fit as a NT coach than Postecoglou who forces players into a game style rather than the fitting the game to the players. I'm less hopeful of having a squad full of technical players- 15 years of being promised it and ending up with possession in the 20's and long balls in the box in 2022. Wanting us to when we have developed the talent underneath is not the same as expecting these particular guys to do it vs Argentina I’m a knock out game.
So much needs to happen in the country to be ready for that and none of that can happen in the once every 4 year showpiece.
You must know this We set out do develop the talent 15 years ago. We've ended up with 42% possession against Tunisia, 31% against Denmark. These are teams we should be matching control of the ball. ( ignore France and Argentina) We are doing something wrong. Every Argentinian player is better on the ball than every Socceroo. Why is this? It is not because of the way we structure youth teams or competitions. It’s because of what we value in young individual players and how we coach their individual skills. To provide some context. Every Argentinian, or Brazilian, is possibly better on the all than every player in any of the UEFA powerhouses too. Maybe France and Spain are closer to them, but they are far better with close ball control than their domestic playing counterparts in the English, Italian and German leagues. Besides football being a religion in Argentina and Brazil , they also have a massive street football culture in these countries. Another facet of play compared to what I've recently identified as a problem in most UEFA teams, is that they select far too many tall players in any given team, apart from Portugal and Spain, and maybe the Netherlands. Argentina's shorter players with a lower centre of gravity, are more nimble on their feet, able to change direction more quickly, and can turn more quickly. Ditto Brazil. Two facets of first touch are to stop it dead, and , to turn away from the opponent as one simultaneously receives the ball. At least we select shorter players like Behich, Kuol and Maclaren. In a country like Australia where football is at best the 5th most popular sport behind AFL, league, union and cricket, we lose a much larger percentage of talented sportspersons to theses codes than nearly every other country in the World Cup. Plus there is virtually no money for youth devotement, because AFL takes most of the financial resources, trying to improve the standard for a sport nobody else plays the world. Governments also put a lot money into Olympic sports too. Apologies to residents of NSW and the ACT. You probably have no idea how AFL enjoys its hegemony in the southern states that it does. Queensland is becoming an AFL state. That's the problem with Australia is their obsession with the provincial sport in AFL. If I would question the governments across Australia and the big business that invest in those sports and ask this, would the AFL touch the hearts and minds of all Australians the Socceroos could achieve within the space of 3 weeks? I haven't seen anything like it but this national team plus the Matildas represent the nation better than anyone but do the authorities know this? When will they wake up realise the potential football can do for the nation? There are definitely those in the current government that realise it. They also embrace the multicultural aspect of football and its ability to unite the population. Anika Wells, Sports Minister couldn't believe the roar of the crowd when Craig Goodwin scored the first goal against France. She had never heard anything like it at a live sports event. She was gobsmacked and thrilled.
|
|
|
angusozi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 194,
Visits: 0
|
+x- the "1" was pure luck, and kind of embarrassing
- Argentina should have had, at least, two more
- one of the "2" was a keeper howler
- we parked the bus for the first hour
- only Licki's fluke got us into the knock-out game -- definitely no 2006 ver.2.0
- we were hopeless against France Republic of Africa
- Arnold's "lob it in and hope" strategies leave a lot to be desired
- we have no strikers
- Mooy will retire
- Ryan should be banned
"France Republic of Africa" fuck off with this racist rubbish mate. Their team is full of proud Frenchmen, as our team is full of proud Australians from many backgrounds. Mods can you ban this sad old man
|
|
|
angusozi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 194,
Visits: 0
|
+xI'll have another beer. It's ended after such a gruelling campaign. Missed the opening Kuwait game but was relieved when my phone showed the early Leckie goal. What a long drawn out process it all was. Jordan away was bloody scary but we won. Covid came and changed so much. How annoying Taggart got the golden boot in 2019. Just great how many have been introduced to the national team set up this cycle. We've got to look forward but there is a pool of older ones who may enjoy some time away yet can easily come in if required. Really impressed by Arnie, he's bounced back from a terrible performance at the Asian Cup to prove to be an excellent tournament coach. Admittedly I wanted him out well through the qualifying as it went on, but he deserves an extension now. While we played incredibly against stronger teams, I think it's fair to say he needs to improve our game against weaker teams who sit deep. The next Asian Cup and the lower pressure qualifying for 2026 will be a great litmus test. I'd like to see a refresh of our squad now.
|
|
|