tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTotal season attendances peaked with Del Piero's ( and Ono and Heskey) two seasons and remained level for another 3 seasons. That's 5 seasons of peak attendances. Sydney FC's average attendance increase by around 5,500 in Del Piero first season alone The there's the TV ratings, the merch, the media interest boost Genuine star players improve the league substantially and contrary to common opinion that this uplift continues for a period after they leave ( but not forever, obviously). However the league benchmark for the first ten years never had one.
Unless you count Thompson, Muscat or Hernandez. All we need is another city of 5 million with no A-League club Its no co-incidence Victory's average went from 22k to 15k the season Heart came in ( who averaged 8k themselves) Geoff Lord was an absolute genius when he insisted his club be the only one in a city of 5+ million. . But your point was about marques not populated cities - the crowd had already dropped about 5k a year before heart too so what was that drop for? It also went up a few thousand again the year after Heart formed so with such data there is not much to be interpreted imo Having a team in a populated city is just common sense really You brought Victory into it, an irrelevant point given that they not only had sports-mad Melbourne all to themselves but the second most-populous State in the nation (hence their name-Victoria) all to themselves. This should never have happened. Marquees have had zero impact in Victoria and Victoria was the best supported for 75% of the a-league. So, no - marquess are a sugar hit but not for long term growth. MV have shown that. Your points can be easliy contradicted by looking at other teams and success over teh 20 year period. Marquees might work for flashy sydney, but other markets have other interests. You don't hear MV fans demanding some superstar. It simply is not needed. You seem to imply something authentic about Victory and its fanbase that's absent with other clubs. I didn't imply anything of the sort. You have read into that to make up for the fact you have not made a valid point. Just admit it's wrong and move on.
|
|
|
|
Butler99
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThe NSL numbers are far better than the detractors make out (especially for the top half dozen clubs). They never had great coverage, and in the last couple of seasons, everyone knew they were about to get wound up, The other thing is that in its last three seasons, it actually had 13 clubs competing (the A-League took 16 years just to get up to 12 clubs), but in 2000 it actually had 16 clubs competing. In the mid 80s, barely 8 years after it started up, it actually had 24 clubs competing! How long to you reckon it will take for the A-League to get up to 24 clubs?? And always remember, it ceased to exist because Lowy had the authority to wind it up (and did precisley that), it didn't cease to exist of its own accord. "Shrinking crowds led to the radical move of introducing more teams" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Soccer_League:hehe::hehe::hehe:The NSL tried everything to be relevant; oscillating between summer and winter, first pass the post and finals, conference north and south, p and r, this, that the other. Citing 24 teams as some example of its success is just plain deranged. NSL crowds were always abysmal. The only decent drawers were Glory, South and Adelaide in the final seasons when everyone knew it was gonna die. Even South were a bit sketchy. It's been a rough couple seasons for the A league post covid, but that doesnt change the fact the A league at its lowest is still better than the NSL at its best. Next year we will see significant improvement, Victory will bounce back , Perth back playing at home, hopefully WU will be playing out of their training facility and maybe more on their stadium, expansion picking up steam. The term "bounce back".. completely foreign to the NSL. It was dismal year after year. Was perth and adelaides success partly due to the nsl finishing? why are perths crowds smaller than during the nsl? Adelaide's success was due to being our first year. It was an outright bandwagon. I remember at one point that season we had 3 distinct active support groups - one at the north end, two at the south. At the north end you were likely surrounded by people with grassroots connections to the local game. At the south end it was basically a who's who of SANFL supporters who loved being in a crowd for what was basically $2 more than an SANFL adult GA ticket at the time. In those days, following SANFL was the best ticket in town which wasn't AFL and the SANFL was anti AFL in its DNA. Going to the soccer and getting that atmosphere was like Christmas to these folks who had already spent the last 10 years avoiding 40,000+ AFL big match atmosphere for crowds of 3-6,000 at their local SANFL ground. When the AL and its pro ticket prices came in, these people were the first out and haven't returned. That's natural, they were always going to fall away once the novelty wore off. Perth was the classic big fish in a small pond. The fan base really thrived on that. The club didn't transition to the AL era well on the park and that flowed through to attendances. Also, there was a big change in the costs to attend games. From memory, I think I was paying at least twice the price for an AL ticket compared to NSL for Adelaide United. The increase was warranted for the change in quality on the park, but for Perth fans who were already watching a professional team in the NSL, the jump wasn't so great (although they obviously had a whole lot of better opposition to watch). Perth have at times had a resurgence in attendance when the team was perofrming well, but you feel like it can't match its NSL glory (no pun intended), so they won't scale those same heights. Personally, I think the club should just focus on the tide lifting all boats rather than mourning how good they were... The answer is simpler than that. Novelty factor. Perth's best crowds were within their first 3 seasons. Their crowds dropped off after they started making finals and having a more dominant team. By the time A-league started Glory were already 7/8 years old? Any NSL crowd averages for Perth glory ? To confirm or reject this. ? A-league's best average attendance also in first 3 years??
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTotal season attendances peaked with Del Piero's ( and Ono and Heskey) two seasons and remained level for another 3 seasons. That's 5 seasons of peak attendances. Sydney FC's average attendance increase by around 5,500 in Del Piero first season alone The there's the TV ratings, the merch, the media interest boost Genuine star players improve the league substantially and contrary to common opinion that this uplift continues for a period after they leave ( but not forever, obviously). However the league benchmark for the first ten years never had one.
Unless you count Thompson, Muscat or Hernandez. All we need is another city of 5 million with no A-League club Its no co-incidence Victory's average went from 22k to 15k the season Heart came in ( who averaged 8k themselves) Geoff Lord was an absolute genius when he insisted his club be the only one in a city of 5+ million. . But your point was about marques not populated cities - the crowd had already dropped about 5k a year before heart too so what was that drop for? It also went up a few thousand again the year after Heart formed so with such data there is not much to be interpreted imo Having a team in a populated city is just common sense really You brought Victory into it, an irrelevant point given that they not only had sports-mad Melbourne all to themselves but the second most-populous State in the nation (hence their name-Victoria) all to themselves. This should never have happened. Marquees have had zero impact in Victoria and Victoria was the best supported for 75% of the a-league. So, no - marquess are a sugar hit but not for long term growth. MV have shown that. Your points can be easliy contradicted by looking at other teams and success over teh 20 year period. Marquees might work for flashy sydney, but other markets have other interests. You don't hear MV fans demanding some superstar. It simply is not needed. You seem to imply something authentic about Victory and its fanbase that's absent with other clubs. I didn't imply anything of the sort. You have read into that to make up for the fact you have not made a valid point. Just admit it's wrong and move on. No I read into that because that's what you meant. "Flashy Sydney"... Ono worked at WSW BTW. The fact is good marquees work. Shit ones don't.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTotal season attendances peaked with Del Piero's ( and Ono and Heskey) two seasons and remained level for another 3 seasons. That's 5 seasons of peak attendances. Sydney FC's average attendance increase by around 5,500 in Del Piero first season alone The there's the TV ratings, the merch, the media interest boost Genuine star players improve the league substantially and contrary to common opinion that this uplift continues for a period after they leave ( but not forever, obviously). However the league benchmark for the first ten years never had one.
Unless you count Thompson, Muscat or Hernandez. All we need is another city of 5 million with no A-League club Its no co-incidence Victory's average went from 22k to 15k the season Heart came in ( who averaged 8k themselves) Geoff Lord was an absolute genius when he insisted his club be the only one in a city of 5+ million. . But your point was about marques not populated cities - the crowd had already dropped about 5k a year before heart too so what was that drop for? It also went up a few thousand again the year after Heart formed so with such data there is not much to be interpreted imo Having a team in a populated city is just common sense really You brought Victory into it, an irrelevant point given that they not only had sports-mad Melbourne all to themselves but the second most-populous State in the nation (hence their name-Victoria) all to themselves. This should never have happened. Marquees have had zero impact in Victoria and Victoria was the best supported for 75% of the a-league. So, no - marquess are a sugar hit but not for long term growth. MV have shown that. Your points can be easliy contradicted by looking at other teams and success over teh 20 year period. Marquees might work for flashy sydney, but other markets have other interests. You don't hear MV fans demanding some superstar. It simply is not needed. You seem to imply something authentic about Victory and its fanbase that's absent with other clubs. I didn't imply anything of the sort. You have read into that to make up for the fact you have not made a valid point. Just admit it's wrong and move on. The fact is good marquees work. Shit ones don't. Let's agree on that
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Re US, money poured into it - only surge back in the day was Peles Cosmos, died again until MLS started, again money against the juggernauts. yer you reckon bucket loads of 2/3 gen Aussie ethnics are low % eh, your not out much eh, spouse it depends where your located, I’ll defy you if your around any Sydney metro grounds over weekends. Pure football - in hope NST down, 1st past the post, PR if when the day comes - I’m not looking at APL regards this whilst it’s all on its lonesome.
Love Football
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Possibly irrelevant as you state but it IS a fact that despite only accounting for 1% of the population Greeks and Italians are vastly over represented when it comes to football clubs they have established, supported, played for and continue to volunteer for in this country. In fact without European migration the NPLs and State leagues in most states would be very sparsely populated indeed... I think thats what LFC was alluding to mate.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOf course everyone likes to see players who can dribble past defenders at pace as this is the ultimate skill of a footballer. ( scoring a goal is the bonus).However the passing game is best suited for most players even professionals.The best teams have outstanding dribblers as well as a smart passing game-to whit Barcelona with Messi. There are some very good dribblers in the A-league-Arzani,Piscopo,Ninkovic and O'Shea to name a few but most players are passers as they have been taught since junior days.The problem with the A-league is that many players have a very average first touch and while they can control the ball if not pressured and then pass this slows down attacking momentum and lacks the cut and thrust of the top European and South American teams.However the new generation of players-Kuol( Garang),Segecic,Irankunda,Archie Goodwin,Robertson,Wilson( from Victory) and quite a few others have a very good first touch and thus they are in a better position to take on a defender or more time to put in a telling pass.Therefore the standard of the league should continue to rise as these players with attacking potential get their chances.As long as the media shines some light on these players interest will grow and hopefully increase crowd attendances and viewing numbers. All of those young players from this generation that have great first touches and dribbling have benefited from the national curriculum which was brought in 12 years ago, so in a way its not a surprise to see this large improvement. It might be an idea for all those naysayers of the National Curriculum, to put their hand up and admit they were wrong. I mean this process was always going to take time to bear fruit, I guess these dutch coaches that were here knew what they were doing all along... I gather you are both heavily invested in this Dutch Curriculum bearing fruit for one reason or another but do you think it has? I must be missing something fundamental because not really seeing any technical improvement at youth level, nor Olyroos nor NTs.... Who are these players blessed with excellent first touch you are talking about??? The NC has made a massive difference. I can speak as a practitioner of the old system and the new, having undertaken coach education in both eras. We wouldn't have made 5 successive WCs, finished 11th in Qatar, plus won the Asian Cup in 2015, without the new system. First touch isn't the only facet of technique. There is also handling speed, running with the ball, 1v1 attacking and defensive skills, and, striking the ball. Moreover, in terms of football performance, technique ( with 5 aspects of it) isn't the only game specific football performance factor attributed to winning games. One also needs to add game sense, communication, mental strength and football conditioning. The NC was only created in 2009, and would have taken some time for it to be fully adopted everywhere. I don't believe any of our world cup qualifications or asian cup victories are due to the NC. We should be judging it off players who fully came through the system so a player would have been no more than 5 years old at the beginning of the NC. Why? Because implying that a coaching "revolution" is successful based on results achieved by players who were already senior players before that so called methodology was implemented is disingenuous at best.
|
|
|
Midfielder
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Possibly irrelevant as you state but it IS a fact that despite only accounting for 1% of the population Greeks and Italians are vastly over represented when it comes to football clubs they have established, supported, played for and continue to volunteer for in this country. In fact without European migration the NPLs and State leagues in most states would be very sparsely populated indeed... I think thats what LFC was alluding to mate. 1 million % true throw in Croatian as well ... It actually highlights or should highlight with the smaller migration %'s coming from lets say strong Football nations, the skill and knowledge passed down from parent to child and often shared as a coach of a local park teams has hugely effected training especially from the mid 90's ..... As a committee member of my local club after registration we would call the teams in and each team needed a manager and coach.... getting a coach was often difficult, getting a coach with knowledge was a nightmare... often you would finish up with a parent who could make it one night but their knowledge what they had of it was in another sport.... At our club we ran coach training nights... the people who turned up were mostly already knowledgeable...... the coaches with little to no knowledge rarely turned up...
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOf course everyone likes to see players who can dribble past defenders at pace as this is the ultimate skill of a footballer. ( scoring a goal is the bonus).However the passing game is best suited for most players even professionals.The best teams have outstanding dribblers as well as a smart passing game-to whit Barcelona with Messi. There are some very good dribblers in the A-league-Arzani,Piscopo,Ninkovic and O'Shea to name a few but most players are passers as they have been taught since junior days.The problem with the A-league is that many players have a very average first touch and while they can control the ball if not pressured and then pass this slows down attacking momentum and lacks the cut and thrust of the top European and South American teams.However the new generation of players-Kuol( Garang),Segecic,Irankunda,Archie Goodwin,Robertson,Wilson( from Victory) and quite a few others have a very good first touch and thus they are in a better position to take on a defender or more time to put in a telling pass.Therefore the standard of the league should continue to rise as these players with attacking potential get their chances.As long as the media shines some light on these players interest will grow and hopefully increase crowd attendances and viewing numbers. All of those young players from this generation that have great first touches and dribbling have benefited from the national curriculum which was brought in 12 years ago, so in a way its not a surprise to see this large improvement. It might be an idea for all those naysayers of the National Curriculum, to put their hand up and admit they were wrong. I mean this process was always going to take time to bear fruit, I guess these dutch coaches that were here knew what they were doing all along... I gather you are both heavily invested in this Dutch Curriculum bearing fruit for one reason or another but do you think it has? I must be missing something fundamental because not really seeing any technical improvement at youth level, nor Olyroos nor NTs.... Who are these players blessed with excellent first touch you are talking about??? The NC has made a massive difference. I can speak as a practitioner of the old system and the new, having undertaken coach education in both eras. We wouldn't have made 5 successive WCs, finished 11th in Qatar, plus won the Asian Cup in 2015, without the new system. First touch isn't the only facet of technique. There is also handling speed, running with the ball, 1v1 attacking and defensive skills, and, striking the ball. Moreover, in terms of football performance, technique ( with 5 aspects of it) isn't the only game specific football performance factor attributed to winning games. One also needs to add game sense, communication, mental strength and football conditioning. The NC was only created in 2009, and would have taken some time for it to be fully adopted everywhere. I don't believe any of our world cup qualifications or asian cup victories are due to the NC. We should be judging it off players who fully came through the system so a player would have been no more than 5 years old at the beginning of the NC. In terms of technique, it takes a long time to for an improvement to occur. Players also need to be inculcated in it from age 10 onwards. Systems were well underway in 2011, as the NC was being written. One of my direct supervisors in the Football Aus system was writing it with a dozen others. They were travelling a lot to Spain, France, Netherlands and Germany to acquire content. However, in terms of tactical development, players can learn very quickly, hence improving quickly, even at senior level. Modes of communication and team structure can be imparted to senior players towards the end of their careers. So the NC, and the curriculum overhaul, from circa 2010, meant tactically Aussie players improved quickly. It is only in the last few years we are starting to see superior technical players emerge, who have learned useful technique acquisition from a young age. Tactically, even in 2012/3 Shinji Ono, stated that the AL was way in advance of the J League, despite being technically inferior. Nearly all our Socceroo success has been attributed to a massive improvement in tactical awareness in the last 10 years.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Possibly irrelevant as you state but it IS a fact that despite only accounting for 1% of the population Greeks and Italians are vastly over represented when it comes to football clubs they have established, supported, played for and continue to volunteer for in this country. In fact without European migration the NPLs and State leagues in most states would be very sparsely populated indeed... I think thats what LFC was alluding to mate. Or......bear with me......football would be bigger because it wasn't ethnically aligned and off-putting to the mainstream. By all accounts pre-WW2 football was very big. Up here on the north coast of NSW, excluding Newcastle, there's barely any ethnically aligned clubs at all and football is easily the most popular sport. Now calm down mono I'm just positing another possible viewpoint. When I first went to Sydney in the late 80s I went to some NSL matches and it wasn't for me for reasons well covered here many times. This is slightly tongue in cheek but also, as they say, 'many a true word spoken in jest'.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Possibly irrelevant as you state but it IS a fact that despite only accounting for 1% of the population Greeks and Italians are vastly over represented when it comes to football clubs they have established, supported, played for and continue to volunteer for in this country. In fact without European migration the NPLs and State leagues in most states would be very sparsely populated indeed... I think thats what LFC was alluding to mate. Or......bear with me......football would be bigger because it wasn't ethnically aligned and off-putting to the mainstream. By all accounts pre-WW2 football was very big. Up here on the north coast of NSW, excluding Newcastle, there's barely any ethnically aligned clubs at all and football is easily the most popular sport. Now calm down mono I'm just positing another possible viewpoint. When I first went to Sydney in the late 80s I went to some NSL matches and it wasn't for me for reasons well covered here many times. This is slightly tongue in cheek but also, as they say, 'many a true word spoken in jest'. Football WAS very big pre WW2 mate, its the biggest sliding doors moment in our code's history that the VFL (especially down here) came home from both wars as the dinky die ANZAC game (played at the foot of the Pyramids and Gallipoli if you believe the hype) and because of Euro migration the "wogball" took a back step in the public's perception. (for some reason Anglo Australia didn't really like the hordes of swarthy, hairy, smelly garlic eating new-Australians and therefore any sport they played must be shit) Ive said it before also that IF there where massive clubs around in the 50s and 60s then most migrants would have gravitated towards them instead of feeling the need to create their own. (Yes yes I know in NSW it was somewhat different, Im talking about Melbourne) In other words if Melbourne Victory was founded in 1905 instead of 2005 then there may NEVER have been a Hellas or Heidelberg or Juve or what have you..... What you say might be true of the north coast of NSW but in saying that it wasn't (from what I know) a very big migrant destination.... Its not hard to see why there aren't many migrant clubs out there :)
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Possibly irrelevant as you state but it IS a fact that despite only accounting for 1% of the population Greeks and Italians are vastly over represented when it comes to football clubs they have established, supported, played for and continue to volunteer for in this country. In fact without European migration the NPLs and State leagues in most states would be very sparsely populated indeed... I think thats what LFC was alluding to mate. Or......bear with me......football would be bigger because it wasn't ethnically aligned and off-putting to the mainstream. By all accounts pre-WW2 football was very big. Up here on the north coast of NSW, excluding Newcastle, there's barely any ethnically aligned clubs at all and football is easily the most popular sport. Now calm down mono I'm just positing another possible viewpoint. When I first went to Sydney in the late 80s I went to some NSL matches and it wasn't for me for reasons well covered here many times. This is slightly tongue in cheek but also, as they say, 'many a true word spoken in jest'. Football WAS very big pre WW2 mate, its the biggest sliding doors moment in our code's history that the VFL (especially down here) came home from both wars as the dinky die ANZAC game (played at the foot of the Pyramids and Gallipoli if you believe the hype) and because of Euro migration the "wogball" took a back step in the public's perception. (for some reason Anglo Australia didn't really like the hordes of swarthy, hairy, smelly garlic eating new-Australians and therefore any sport they played must be shit) Ive said it before also that IF there where massive clubs around in the 50s and 60s then most migrants would have gravitated towards them instead of feeling the need to create their own. (Yes yes I know in NSW it was somewhat different, Im talking about Melbourne) In other words if Melbourne Victory was founded in 1905 instead of 2005 then there may NEVER have been a Hellas or Heidelberg or Juve or what have you..... What you say might be true of the north coast of NSW but in saying that it wasn't (from what I know) a very big migrant destination.... Its not hard to see why there aren't many migrant clubs out there :) Migrants weren't looking for a suitable brand for which to take their family to watch product on a Saturday. They were looking for a job to replace the shirt they arrived in. The wog clubs were always going to be started because they were community first. Skips may try to rewrite history about how unwelcoming it all was, but these clubs were so welcoming that close enough was good enough. My old man was making his tradie connections off the boat with cros and not even half the words are the same between south and west slavs. The Italians were great as well but it was less talking more pointing. I'm so proud of that shit TBH
|
|
|
Bender Parma
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 428,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Possibly irrelevant as you state but it IS a fact that despite only accounting for 1% of the population Greeks and Italians are vastly over represented when it comes to football clubs they have established, supported, played for and continue to volunteer for in this country. In fact without European migration the NPLs and State leagues in most states would be very sparsely populated indeed... I think thats what LFC was alluding to mate. Or......bear with me......football would be bigger because it wasn't ethnically aligned and off-putting to the mainstream. By all accounts pre-WW2 football was very big. Up here on the north coast of NSW, excluding Newcastle, there's barely any ethnically aligned clubs at all and football is easily the most popular sport. Now calm down mono I'm just positing another possible viewpoint. When I first went to Sydney in the late 80s I went to some NSL matches and it wasn't for me for reasons well covered here many times. This is slightly tongue in cheek but also, as they say, 'many a true word spoken in jest'. Football WAS very big pre WW2 mate, its the biggest sliding doors moment in our code's history that the VFL (especially down here) came home from both wars as the dinky die ANZAC game (played at the foot of the Pyramids and Gallipoli if you believe the hype) and because of Euro migration the "wogball" took a back step in the public's perception. (for some reason Anglo Australia didn't really like the hordes of swarthy, hairy, smelly garlic eating new-Australians and therefore any sport they played must be shit) Ive said it before also that IF there where massive clubs around in the 50s and 60s then most migrants would have gravitated towards them instead of feeling the need to create their own. (Yes yes I know in NSW it was somewhat different, Im talking about Melbourne) In other words if Melbourne Victory was founded in 1905 instead of 2005 then there may NEVER have been a Hellas or Heidelberg or Juve or what have you..... What you say might be true of the north coast of NSW but in saying that it wasn't (from what I know) a very big migrant destination.... Its not hard to see why there aren't many migrant clubs out there :) I am pretty sure that NZAC half of the ANZACS were not to interested in VFL!
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Possibly irrelevant as you state but it IS a fact that despite only accounting for 1% of the population Greeks and Italians are vastly over represented when it comes to football clubs they have established, supported, played for and continue to volunteer for in this country. In fact without European migration the NPLs and State leagues in most states would be very sparsely populated indeed... I think thats what LFC was alluding to mate. Or......bear with me......football would be bigger because it wasn't ethnically aligned and off-putting to the mainstream. By all accounts pre-WW2 football was very big. Up here on the north coast of NSW, excluding Newcastle, there's barely any ethnically aligned clubs at all and football is easily the most popular sport. Now calm down mono I'm just positing another possible viewpoint. When I first went to Sydney in the late 80s I went to some NSL matches and it wasn't for me for reasons well covered here many times. This is slightly tongue in cheek but also, as they say, 'many a true word spoken in jest'. Football WAS very big pre WW2 mate, its the biggest sliding doors moment in our code's history that the VFL (especially down here) came home from both wars as the dinky die ANZAC game (played at the foot of the Pyramids and Gallipoli if you believe the hype) and because of Euro migration the "wogball" took a back step in the public's perception. (for some reason Anglo Australia didn't really like the hordes of swarthy, hairy, smelly garlic eating new-Australians and therefore any sport they played must be shit) Ive said it before also that IF there where massive clubs around in the 50s and 60s then most migrants would have gravitated towards them instead of feeling the need to create their own. (Yes yes I know in NSW it was somewhat different, Im talking about Melbourne) In other words if Melbourne Victory was founded in 1905 instead of 2005 then there may NEVER have been a Hellas or Heidelberg or Juve or what have you..... What you say might be true of the north coast of NSW but in saying that it wasn't (from what I know) a very big migrant destination.... Its not hard to see why there aren't many migrant clubs out there :) Migrants weren't looking for a suitable brand for which to take their family to watch product on a Saturday. They were looking for a job to replace the shirt they arrived in. The wog clubs were always going to be started because they were community first. Skips may try to rewrite history about how unwelcoming it all was, but these clubs were so welcoming that close enough was good enough. My old man was making his tradie connections off the boat with cros and not even half the words are the same between south and west slavs. The Italians were great as well but it was less talking more pointing. I'm so proud of that shit TBH So am I :) Still happening today thank Christ. https://twitter.com/sebth/status/1646681358616657920?cxt=HHwWgIDU6ZP-l9otAAAA
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Possibly irrelevant as you state but it IS a fact that despite only accounting for 1% of the population Greeks and Italians are vastly over represented when it comes to football clubs they have established, supported, played for and continue to volunteer for in this country. In fact without European migration the NPLs and State leagues in most states would be very sparsely populated indeed... I think thats what LFC was alluding to mate. Or......bear with me......football would be bigger because it wasn't ethnically aligned and off-putting to the mainstream. By all accounts pre-WW2 football was very big. Up here on the north coast of NSW, excluding Newcastle, there's barely any ethnically aligned clubs at all and football is easily the most popular sport. Now calm down mono I'm just positing another possible viewpoint. When I first went to Sydney in the late 80s I went to some NSL matches and it wasn't for me for reasons well covered here many times. This is slightly tongue in cheek but also, as they say, 'many a true word spoken in jest'. Football WAS very big pre WW2 mate, its the biggest sliding doors moment in our code's history that the VFL (especially down here) came home from both wars as the dinky die ANZAC game (played at the foot of the Pyramids and Gallipoli if you believe the hype) and because of Euro migration the "wogball" took a back step in the public's perception. (for some reason Anglo Australia didn't really like the hordes of swarthy, hairy, smelly garlic eating new-Australians and therefore any sport they played must be shit) Ive said it before also that IF there where massive clubs around in the 50s and 60s then most migrants would have gravitated towards them instead of feeling the need to create their own. (Yes yes I know in NSW it was somewhat different, Im talking about Melbourne) In other words if Melbourne Victory was founded in 1905 instead of 2005 then there may NEVER have been a Hellas or Heidelberg or Juve or what have you..... What you say might be true of the north coast of NSW but in saying that it wasn't (from what I know) a very big migrant destination.... Its not hard to see why there aren't many migrant clubs out there :) I am pretty sure that NZAC half of the ANZACS were not to interested in VFL! fair enough... I did say "especially down here"
|
|
|
Flytox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 413,
Visits: 0
|
It is interesting that after 20 years of the NSW Federation, where the migrant run clubs took over football and controlled the new state leagues, when the NSL was started about seventy five percent of the players in the Sydney NSL clubs in the first year were of anglo or western celt heritage. Although the share of players with mainland European heritage increased as the children of those first migrants grew up and migration continued it is worth asking what did the takeover of football by the migrant clubs achieve in Sydney in that first 20 years that couldn't have been achieved by the migrants becoming involved in the existing clubs and whether that strategy would have delivered a league that was embraced by the whole population.
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
We're hopeless at tracking footballing history in Australia, that's why virtually nothing is known of all the British Football Association leagues and clubs which dominated pre-WWII. Going back even further, according to Ian Syson, football was the dominant code in Australi pre-WWI, and more round ballers signed up to serve in the war than any other football code (and more were killed). A heap of football clubs which existed up to 1914 were completely wiped out of existence. Those that survived dominated the scene right up to the post-war migration boom (post-1946).
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPuts on helmet and risks the outrange of many.... by posting about the MLS If there is a competition destined to fail it’s the MLS according to countless, journalist, opinion makers, many Football people, almost everybody outside MLS folk. Using a weather report to describe MLS, it would be cold, wet, gloomy, dismal miserable, guismil & glum. Most must think I have lost my marbles, we all know, it’s a retirement league, a giant ponzi scheme, a plastic league, soulless. Yet in 2022 with a media deal worth only 65 million MLS turnover was 1.85 billion or put another way the media deal was 3.6% of revenue. This year with 29 teams turnover with a new 300 million media deal will be over 2.3 billion. How they did this is worth analysis… because of work I had to do I needed to look at the MLS and then kinda got into their management …. The essence or say core of MLS thinking and all if not most decisions are fan focused…. MLS don't want to lose fans and they wish to grow there fan base . at the very heart of major decisions the MLS look at how fans will react ...
Last year over 10 million thu the gate with stadiums over all teams averaging over 94% capacity…. The big take away is they make almost all their revenue via fans…. I can say what they did and show some vids if people want…. The A-League needs to average 15k and the leadership and management of most clubs is lacking. ... as a league we place to much emphasise on broadcasting and broadcasters needs... we play 156 games just assume we averaged 10k more thats 1.56 million and @ $ 25.00 per ticket thats 37.5 million extra... increased crowds also brings in higher sponsorships and generally more media coverage... Someone posted earlier .. "" A house Divided against itself will fall over""" very true.... we don't seem to have the leadership to connect to the park teams nor offer a vision for the future that people will get behind... The A-L needs a fan focused decision making model approach .... increasing the fan base will lift all other metrics ... That's well and good but have a look at this list of players the MLS has ( Chiellini doesn't earn enough to make this list) Enzo From around 2000 to 2004 the MLS was near bankruptcy and could not afford the players on your list and remember this is round 6 I think this year ... have a look at the guy that scores a hat trick his second and third goals just class and the first was not bad either.... goals if you can't watch the full 5 minutes are at app....1:30 and 3:40 and 4:35. MLS build to this level.... and I keep repeating it is based largely on a fan focused decision making model.... AnyWho... LA V Austin as an example ... would love the scorer in the A-l... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa7TvfhaFYY&ab_channel=MajorLeagueSoccer Of course its a fan-based model. Bring in top players- Villa, Pirlo, Gerrard, Lampard, Ibrahimovic- and the fans will love you for it. But notice the pattern-one marquee follows another, who follows another, who follows another. Unlike the A-League- "we spent $4 mill once on Del Peiro, and we only got 5 years worth of boosted attendances, tv ratings, media attention and merch. What a waste. Lets never do that again. Best to give the fans Jack Clisby at his twelfth A-League club. That's who the fans want to watch". he don't get it....... By the way with pop @ 390M most sports get a look in just depends the level re USA. MLS is a pauper (still) in the big picture like us here due to other codes farfar more mainstream and supported but used as a yardstick is not in our best interest regards to a pure football model. The sugar hits will forever keep going in the MLS due to the amount of billionaire type owners who just as here only have concerns for their product not the game as a whole. The NFL's total 2022 revenue was $18 billion, an increase from $12.2 billion in 2020 compared to MLS. Sponsorship revenue totaled $2.05B across the 32 NFL teams in the 2022-2023 season–a new league record, and a 14% increase year-over-year. When combined with the league as a whole, total sponsorship revenue was $2.7B Then you could check NBA/NHL again would be streaks ahead of MLS. I agree our governers need to put more focus on the "fans" and NOT follow MLS for its typically USA whereas we the small country we are have more links/gens with EU and failed league or not (NSL) foundations entrenched by efffnics - huge diff to USA's DNA. The focus should be on the broken foundation we have, its there for the taking with the right people/remodel instead of following anything USA. Then the people will come with more unity. If every sport gets a "look-in ", why was football in the US so shit for so long (and failed previously)? What is this "pure football model" you speak of? As for connections to the EU, 2 in 3 Aussies were born here. They a generation or two or more removed form those EU connections. The two big (non-UK) ethnics, the Italians and Greeks who were born overseas total 1% of the population. Combined. There are more people born in Nepal than born in Greece living here. The Effniks are basically irrelevant. Possibly irrelevant as you state but it IS a fact that despite only accounting for 1% of the population Greeks and Italians are vastly over represented when it comes to football clubs they have established, supported, played for and continue to volunteer for in this country. In fact without European migration the NPLs and State leagues in most states would be very sparsely populated indeed... I think thats what LFC was alluding to mate. I’ll jump in for he did say 1% were born over there way back then - like my father for eg who arrived here with many other Italians very early 50’s. Point I jumped on that I and countless other 1st born wog gens have carried on in playing and 3rd now 4th gen. All of us are aussies but proud wog blood and those in my time kept the flame going through thick and thin. As Bohemia mentions about being proud, damn right what they went through before us and what I/we went through being 1st gen borns here….so so glad my Dad took me to NSL games in the 60/70’s the atmosphere was what Muz couldn’t gravitate to that I understand but it was where we felt comfortable amongst ourselves after all the crap you copped during the week being a wog. The old Clubs wouldn’t be alive today if it wasn’t for the gens following……. MSC re Muz’s points north coast of Sydney. Many many Italians did venture mid north coast for farming - the banana plantations some started by Italians originally. I’d say they were too damn busy working unlike being in the city burbs hence not many or any ethnic Clubs. Same applied re Bris - many boats arrived there with migrants but most made their way down to Sydney or Melb knowing more work and connections.
Love Football
|
|
|
Flytox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 413,
Visits: 0
|
+xWe're hopeless at tracking footballing history in Australia, that's why virtually nothing is known of all the British Football Association leagues and clubs which dominated pre-WWII. Going back even further, according to Ian Syson, football was the dominant code in Australi pre-WWI, and more round ballers signed up to serve in the war than any other football code (and more were killed). A heap of football clubs which existed up to 1914 were completely wiped out of existence. Those that survived dominated the scene right up to the post-war migration boom (post-1946). There were a couple of periods of migration in the interwar years fro the United Kingdom, one fro Germany, another fro Italy and enough displaced ewish people to start the Hakoah club in Melbourne in 1928 and Sydney in 1939. These helped to continue to grow the game. The first 5 years post WW2 migration was dominated by migrants fro the United Kingdom, about 80% iirc. By the end of the post WW2 migration surge the United Kingdom had provided 40% of the total of migrants. NB. Apologies for the keys on y copter that aren't working. )
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWe're hopeless at tracking footballing history in Australia, that's why virtually nothing is known of all the British Football Association leagues and clubs which dominated pre-WWII. Going back even further, according to Ian Syson, football was the dominant code in Australi pre-WWI, and more round ballers signed up to serve in the war than any other football code (and more were killed). A heap of football clubs which existed up to 1914 were completely wiped out of existence. Those that survived dominated the scene right up to the post-war migration boom (post-1946). One forum member, Localstar, is a football historian. He has published football books. He would probably know quite a bit.
|
|
|
clockwork orange
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Back on topic. The reason Brisbane crowds are so poor are many: 1. Several past issues where club (as well as the league) actively antagonised active support 2. A policy of no marquees 3. No ‘personality’ players in the past 6-7 years. Unfortunately long-term players; Hingert, O’Shea, Aldred, aren’t great marketing material. 4. Endless turnstile of players here for one season then gone 5. No national team players for years 6. Gone are the days when we brought through great juniors - Kruse, Oar, Borello, Yeboah 7. Moving home ground 35km away 8. Poor scheduling over the years (so fans get out of the routine) 9. Owners with no ambition. 10. Poor brand of football. The Fowler debacle was for me the turning pt where I lost interest. There was a bit of excitement generated, he brought core ‘clubmen’ like Aldred and O’Shea to the club, he’d turned us from wooden spooners to competitors in a season, and there was the possibility his name could attract players in future. The fact that he didn’t return for the sake of a few thousand dollars was just another example of the incompetence of the administration of this club over its history.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBack on topic. The reason Brisbane crowds are so poor are many: 1. Several past issues where club (as well as the league) actively antagonised active support 2. A policy of no marquees 3. No ‘personality’ players in the past 6-7 years. Long term players; unfortunately Hingert, O’Shea, Aldred aren’t great marketing material. 4. Endless turnstile of players here for one season then gone 5. No national team players for years 6. Gone are the days when we brought through great juniors - Kruse, Oar, Borello, Yeboah 7. Moving home ground 35km away 8. Poor scheduling over the years (so fans get out of the routine) 9. Owners with no ambition. 10. Poor brand of football. The Fowler debacle was for me the turning pt where I lost interest. There was a bit of excitement generated, he brought core ‘clubmen’ like Aldred and O’Shea to the club, he’d turned us from wooden spooners to competitors in a season, and there was the possibility his name could attract players in future. The fact that he didn’t return for the sake of a few thousand dollars was just another example of the incompetence of the administration of this club over its history. Interesting post, CO. Thanks for posting it. Hadn't realised Roar has had so few Socceroos for years?
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
5 match reports have been put up on the board in the last 2 hours - all with zero responses. Maybe 12 or so years ago, when 442 was still thing and we had a thriving discussion board, those 5 articles may have had 100 comments inside two hours, with 50 different posters getting involved. I mention that because the crowds, the ratings, the media interest, the paucity of posters on this board, the disappearance of the coverage that used occur across a range of media and platforms - it's all part of the same malaise - it's all related - none of it is happening in a vacuum. What are the chances of a recovery? To season 3 levels of crowds and media interest? From where we currently sit - absolutely zero chance.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWe're hopeless at tracking footballing history in Australia, that's why virtually nothing is known of all the British Football Association leagues and clubs which dominated pre-WWII. Going back even further, according to Ian Syson, football was the dominant code in Australi pre-WWI, and more round ballers signed up to serve in the war than any other football code (and more were killed). A heap of football clubs which existed up to 1914 were completely wiped out of existence. Those that survived dominated the scene right up to the post-war migration boom (post-1946). I have a great book on pre nsl football history in South Australia
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Will post cover here later
|
|
|
clockwork orange
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x5 match reports have been put up on the board in the last 2 hours - all with zero responses. Maybe 12 or so years ago, when 442 was still thing and we had a thriving discussion board, those 5 articles may have had 100 comments inside two hours, with 50 different posters getting involved. I mention that because the crowds, the ratings, the media interest, the paucity of posters on this board, the disappearance of the coverage that used occur across a range of media and platforms - it's all part of the same malaise - it's all related - none of it is happening in a vacuum. What are the chances of a recovery? To season 3 levels of crowds and media interest? From where we currently sit - absolutely zero chance. 12 years ago fans of every other club would be eagerly posting our delight at the demise of MV. Now, no one even cares. This forum has definitely reflected the ongoing decline in interest in the league. My EPL team is in a relegation battle and I’m checking the score as soon as I wake. With Brisbane … meh - I know we aren’t going to win nor be relegated so no pressure at all.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x5 match reports have been put up on the board in the last 2 hours - all with zero responses. Maybe 12 or so years ago, when 442 was still thing and we had a thriving discussion board, those 5 articles may have had 100 comments inside two hours, with 50 different posters getting involved. I mention that because the crowds, the ratings, the media interest, the paucity of posters on this board, the disappearance of the coverage that used occur across a range of media and platforms - it's all part of the same malaise - it's all related - none of it is happening in a vacuum. What are the chances of a recovery? To season 3 levels of crowds and media interest? From where we currently sit - absolutely zero chance. 12 years ago fans of every other club would be eagerly posting our delight at the demise of MV. Now, no one even cares. This forum has definitely reflected the ongoing decline in interest in the league. My EPL team is in a relegation battle and I’m checking the score as soon as I wake. With Brisbane … meh - I know we aren’t going to win nor be relegated so no pressure at all. You see posts by some arguing the current model is viable and nothing would change if the unbelievable happenned opening up (how does one know) The fish where the fish are there - most watch/have interest in other leagues having P/R, their young kids watch and learn about it might I add looking ahead. No matter how good the football can/will be top of the ladder there is Nothing worth playing for x 6 clubs or keeping supporters interest, thats right its same again next season in the hope your Club has recruited for the better next season and that hit and miss, look at MV with all the resource they have the last few seasons.
Love Football
|
|
|
Flytox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 413,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWe're hopeless at tracking footballing history in Australia, that's why virtually nothing is known of all the British Football Association leagues and clubs which dominated pre-WWII. Going back even further, according to Ian Syson, football was the dominant code in Australi pre-WWI, and more round ballers signed up to serve in the war than any other football code (and more were killed). A heap of football clubs which existed up to 1914 were completely wiped out of existence. Those that survived dominated the scene right up to the post-war migration boom (post-1946). I have a great book on pre nsl football history in South Australia I have a book on the history of football in NSW pre NSL as well. It is great to read the history of the game fro its beginnings in Australia.
|
|
|
Flytox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 413,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x5 match reports have been put up on the board in the last 2 hours - all with zero responses. Maybe 12 or so years ago, when 442 was still thing and we had a thriving discussion board, those 5 articles may have had 100 comments inside two hours, with 50 different posters getting involved. I mention that because the crowds, the ratings, the media interest, the paucity of posters on this board, the disappearance of the coverage that used occur across a range of media and platforms - it's all part of the same malaise - it's all related - none of it is happening in a vacuum. What are the chances of a recovery? To season 3 levels of crowds and media interest? From where we currently sit - absolutely zero chance. 12 years ago fans of every other club would be eagerly posting our delight at the demise of MV. Now, no one even cares. This forum has definitely reflected the ongoing decline in interest in the league. My EPL team is in a relegation battle and I’m checking the score as soon as I wake. With Brisbane … meh - I know we aren’t going to win nor be relegated so no pressure at all. You see posts by some arguing the current model is viable and nothing would change if the unbelievable happenned opening up (how does one know) The fish where the fish are there - most watch/have interest in other leagues having P/R, their young kids watch and learn about it might I add looking ahead. No matter how good the football can/will be top of the ladder there is Nothing worth playing for x 6 clubs or keeping supporters interest, thats right its same again next season in the hope your Club has recruited for the better next season and that hit and miss, look at MV with all the resource they have the last few seasons. The first club eliminated fro finals was the Bulls on Friday night. The second was Victory last night. Interest was kept for all clubs for 24 of 26 rounds.
|
|
|