No recourse for banned Kewell


No recourse for banned Kewell

Author
Message
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
Quote:
No recourse for banned Kewell

Posted June 20, 2010 20:03:00

Harry Kewell's one-match World Cup ban has been confirmed following his send-off against Ghana and there is no right of appeal.

Kewell's red card for handball in Saturday's 1-1 draw with Ghana drew an automatic one-match ban from FIFA.

Under FIFA rules, there is no right of appeal, meaning Kewell is out of the must-win clash with Serbia on Thursday morning (AEST) whether Australia likes it or not.

Kewell was livid after his send-off, which was for blocking a goalbound Jonathan Mensah shot on the goalline with his upper arm after just 25 minutes of the match.

Italian referee Roberto Rosetti had no hesitation in brandishing red and awarding a penalty, which Ghana scored to equalise.

While Kewell, several players and coach Pim Verbeek publicly said the referee had made a mistake, Football Federation Australia has no choice but to cop the ban.

"At the moment, there is no avenue for challenging a referee's decision apart from in cases of mistaken identity," FFA head of national teams John Boultbee said on Sunday.

"Here there is no option of an increased suspension, so there's nothing to argue against."

FIFA rules allow no more than a one-match ban for handling the ball and preventing a goalscoring opportunity.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/20/2931931.htm?site=sport§ion=football

schimch
schimch
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K, Visits: 0
I've got something

could they base a case around the reaction time? Say work out how far away the ball was shot from and at what speed and prove that even with the best possible reaction time it was impossible for Harry to knowingly (which the rules state) play at the ball with his hand?
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
You'd have to take the case to the court of arbitration in sport, and by the time they made a decision kewell's ban would have been served anyway.
f1worldchamp
f1worldchamp
Pro
Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K, Visits: 0
schimch wrote:
I've got something

You've got nothing.
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
f1worldchamp wrote:
schimch wrote:
I've got something

You've got nothing.

That's what sh--...your doctor said? :?
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search