imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
2.23pm: Hicks has written a letter to the court: He says that he and Gillett feel they "had become excluded from the sales process by the board".
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
2.23pm: Hicks has written a letter to the court: He says that he and Gillett feel they "had become excluded from the sales process by the board".
...by not even attending the court case today...
"In the absnece of boardmembers, a vote can still be taken and if their is still amajority, new rulings/decisions can be passed.
The won 3-0, formed a sub committee and sanctioned a sale.
Hick's fault for spitting his dummy out whislt having a brew."
Things may still be safe.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
 The scenes outside the courthouse.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
This is far more important than LFC. This is about football as a whole.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
2.32pm: From Sachin Nakranioutside court: Hicks claims that the sub-committee became so ingrained that the directors started to refer to it as the "home team" in emails between themselves. One of which was accidentally sent to the owners at start of last week. Hicks claims that he only breached sales agreement by trying to oust two board members because the sub committee was a breach of the sales agreement in itself.
Eep.
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
:D at the home team
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
imnofreak wrote:This is far more important than LFC. This is about football as a whole. I dare say this isn't even just about football, but all sporting codes.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
imnofreak wrote:2.32pm: From Sachin Nakranioutside court: Hicks claims that the sub-committee became so ingrained that the directors started to refer to it as the "home team" in emails between themselves. One of which was accidentally sent to the owners at start of last week. Hicks claims that he only breached sales agreement by trying to oust two board members because the sub committee was a breach of the sales agreement in itself.
Eep. "Wouldnt make a difference if Purslow wrote Hicks a personal letter calling him a "decrepit ******* **** face!".......the fact is, the sale is legal and you cant sack the board because board members dont like you."
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
danroan H&G want a trial next week -Judge about to rule
TENSION
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
2.46pm: From court: G&H QC dismisses Friday's deadline and says that instead the owners and RBS are "locked into an agreement" until 1 November.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
2.38pm: Much discussion about Mill Financial: my understanding is that, via its lawyers, Mill Financial approached Liverpool recently but were told "the club had already been sold". It has been suggested (by Tom Stewart via email) that "Mill Financial is owned by US Billionaire Dwight Schar, Chairman of NVR and Co-Owner of the NFL Washington Redskins". Checking that out...
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
2.46pm: From court: G&H QC dismisses Friday's deadline and says that instead the owners and RBS are "locked into an agreement" until 1 November.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:2.46pm: From court: G&H QC dismisses Friday's deadline and says that instead the owners and RBS are "locked into an agreement" until 1 November. Well, at least this gives us more time on the loan, however, the quicker this is sorted the better.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:2.46pm: From court: G&H QC dismisses Friday's deadline and says that instead the owners and RBS are "locked into an agreement" until 1 November. Well, at least this gives us more time on the loan, however, the quicker this is sorted the better.
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
But wouldn't RBS know this, there the one taking part in legal proceedings and that they said the deadline is friday, this could be another ploy?
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
The Doctor wrote:2.46pm: From court: G&H QC dismisses Friday's deadline and says that instead the owners and RBS are "locked into an agreement" until 1 November.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? Seems like they are saying the loan isn't due till Nov 1... however, like you say, RBS would know. CONFUSION REIGNS SUPREME
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
I have NFI why they have just mentioned this now though!?!?!?!?!?
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
H&G want a trial next week -Judge about to rule
that was 11 minutes ago from Roan
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
imnofreak wrote:I have NFI why they have just mentioned this now though!?!?!?!?!? whats NFI?
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
The Doctor wrote:But wouldn't RBS know this, there the one taking part in legal proceedings and that they said the deadline is friday, this could be another ploy? It's got to be a ploy to get the bank to extend the loan. Surely. I can't make head nor tail of this. But surely the bank would know the due date for the loan.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
The Doctor wrote:H&G want a trial next week -Judge about to rule
that was 11 minutes ago from Roan Still imagining my 1am predo isn't too far off. Please judge... be brave.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
The Doctor wrote:imnofreak wrote:I have NFI why they have just mentioned this now though!?!?!?!?!? whats NFI? No fucking idea
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
imnofreak wrote:The Doctor wrote:H&G want a trial next week -Judge about to rule
that was 11 minutes ago from Roan Still imagining my 1am predo isn't too far off. Please judge... be brave. your staying the fuck up with us... iv got uni at 9, if im staying up you can stay up
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
NO FUCKING UPDATES IS SENDING ME FUCKING CRAZY
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Lord Grabiner QC is now speaking on behalf of the Liverpool board. He tells the court the two alternative offers for the club are "besides the mark" as it is the role of the board to find a buyer, so if they decide to go for NESV then so be it.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
2.57pm: Lord Grabiner QC is now speaking on behalf of the Liverpool board. He tells the court the two alternative offers for the club are "besides the mark" as it is the role of the board to find a buyer, so if they decide to go for NESV then so be it.
Here we go...suck it to 'em!
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
should of pushed the point that New England were the best suitors and best potential owners
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
The Doctor wrote:imnofreak wrote:The Doctor wrote:H&G want a trial next week -Judge about to rule
that was 11 minutes ago from Roan Still imagining my 1am predo isn't too far off. Please judge... be brave. your staying the fuck up with us... iv got uni at 9, if im staying up you can stay up Yeah i'm staying up... Been running on less than 4 hours sleep, been up since 7.30, but I can't sleep with this going on.
|
|
|