Twenty20 Big bash has started tonight. WA vs TAS

:lol: My bad. Made sense at the time for some unknown reason.

I was more 'lolwut' at the Not one 100 or 50 in the match. But Laxman got 96. :lol:

Funky understood it :p

Edited by avy1990: 30/12/2010 11:27:16 AM

I'd prefer to watch that than a match where both teams get past 400 only 2/3 wickets down.

EDIT: BTW, I think Avy was LolWut at you saying no one got 100 or 50, and then saying Laxman got 96:p

Edited by Funky Munky: 30/12/2010 11:26:05 AM

It was retarted:lol: The highest total score was 228 ffs:lol:

lolwut?

Sounds like Kingsmead

South Africa all out for 215. India win by 87 runs and level the series at 1-1. Not one 100 or 50 in the match, Laxman coming the closest to 100 with 96, the highest score after that was 39. Not one total past 300.

Edited by sydneycroatia58: 29/12/2010 11:01:26 PM

I would go for 12 changes to the Australian squad for Sydney.

South Africa 155/7. Still need 148 runs. Heading for a series leveller.

That's not going to happen, becuase if you noticed, ricky said 'we', and if 'we' drop the shit and pick up decent players ricky won't be there.

I will go for facepalm, unless we rearrange the squad and drop shit and pick up decent players

I don't know whether to laugh, facepalm or just vomit.

On you get.

So you're more of an England fan that Aus? :S

there it is,

[size=9]ENGLAND HAVE RETAINED THE ASHES![/size]

:d :cool: \:d/ =d> :d :cool: \:d/ =d> :d :cool: \:d/ =d> :d :cool: \:d/ =d> :d :cool: \:d/ =d> :d :cool: \:d/ =d> :d :cool: \:d/ =d> :d :cool: \:d/

Siddle out for 40, one more and the Ashes stay in England! :cool:

VVS Laxman. What a great player

Bad light brings an early end to the days play. South Africa finish 111/3, Kallis 12* De Villiers 17*. SA need another 192 runs to win.

India all out for 228. Laxman out for 96. South Africa chasing 303 to win.

We should call him up!

VVS Laxman, Disaster Recovery Consultant has steered India to 218/7 with a lead of 292

Seems to be a serious problem, especially for a high order batsman.

Not only that, but he's generally on strike too. He's a quiet caller, they were talking about it on 9 today.

Ok, so I take that back.

It seems like Watson's always out in the middle when there's a player run-out. Is he hard of hearing or something?

Watson's been the most consistent? Until this test, Hussey hadn't been dismissed for less than 50 all series. And even with Watson batting one more innings, and Hussey failing this test, he still has nearly 200 runs more for the series, and an average 25 points higher than Watson.

There's no way you can say Hussey hasn't been Australia's best batsman this series. He's been miles ahead of the rest.

It wouldn't make a massive difference, but it would help having two openers who you know could put on a 100-150 run opening stand. Just don't get that feeling with Hughes.

Hussey didn't really make much of a go at it this game though. Watson's been the most consistent. Australia would have been fucked without either of them, really.

Definitely the loss of Katich isn't helping things, Sydcro. But would it be making THAT much difference?

TBF with Watson, as an opener I don't care about him getting a big score. I want my openers to set up the innings with a good 100-150 run partnership. Big scores are just a bonus imo. Watson has been holding up his end of that deal and if Katich hadn't got injured he would have had someone who is capable of holding up the other end, with Hughes he doesn't have that, which is why not getting a big score suddenly looks bad.

He hasn't been run out at all. He's been involved in two of them, but hasn't actually been run out himself. As for not getting the support, He's never been later than the 4th wicket to fall, in any innings this series. The supports been there, he just hasn't made the most of it.

Bit unfair on Hussey to say Watson has been the pick of the batsmen. And I assume you mean Pick of the Aussie batsmen.