R.E Scouse's "scouse's spam-a-lot thread - for when your post count just isn't enough" thread.

This is banned, meanwhile Joffa on a regular basis starts meaningless threads nobody is interested in. Surely a thread as mentioned above where people are allowed to have fun, and a bit of a laugh should be allowed, after a few days it'll have worn off.

Yours in freedom of speech.

FourFourTwo Regulars.

Can this be the new spam thread?

inb4 lockage... although if we spam imno jokes like last time it may stay open

It'sh all a load of codshwallop.

Joffa starts threads that are related to football (or in some cases in ET, general interest threads). He has a handful of threads that get only a few responses, but most garner a lot of attention and receive many responses.

Scouse started a thread, posting one word replies as some futile gesture that was to no end.



If you want this thread to be locked too, go ahead.

So this thread http://au.fourfourtwo.com/forums/default.aspx?g=posts&t=53291 is not spam - sure, Special One TV is funny, but did he need to post a new video for each comment. No, it was Deliberate spam. You and I, and the whole forum know it.

We demand that if you uphold fair rights towards us, you Punish Joffa. It is only fair. =;


Edited by Heineken: 2/5/2011 01:47:35 AM

The thread title is 'shpam'. Sho why not shpam inshide? I don't get it!

Joffa made 8 posts over a period of one hour.

Scouse made 8 posts in a period of 10 minutes.

Joffa was posting content unique and relevant to the topic at hand.

Scouse was posting one word replies to suit some weird agenda.

They aren't even close to being the same.

He does have a point there... Joffa posts follow up articles to his original post when nobody has commented on it days later

Yes he does rather than start a new thread when there is already a thread on the matter.

But why continue to post when it hasn't gained any interest/attention

Joffa actually does post useful stuff, and doesnt create a new thread for the same subject if he finds new info, he confines it to the one thread, if people are interested enough they will go and read that topic. Just because there may not be a reply in the thread doesnt mean no-one wants to read it. I know plenty of times I've read a article posted by Joffa, found it interesting but didnt feel the need to comment on it.

This. I wrote more but this sums it up nicely.