krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:rewdewa wrote:I think all A-league clubs should have their own youth set-up, from under-13s up to under-18s and they would be playing in their local league. In this case NYL would essentially become a reserve league which would allow these youth players to get more game time and train with the senior players at their club, this comp would also serve as a league that gives fringe players more game time too. You see I disagree, partly, I think the HAL Franchises should concentrate at Youth level say U16 to U21. Below that age group will cause them nothing but headaches and possibly affect their brand negatively. At junior level U15 to U7 most of our players are at a good standard, it is that "transition" stage from Youth to Senior Football were we have our major issues. At U16 and below they would be better off working co-operatively with local clubs, maybe at different support levels. E.g. 10 junior clubs at high support level, 20 junior clubs at medium support level and 40 junior clubs at loew support level. I'll also add that the majority of TOP LEVEL coaches I have spoken to have said that there is no-way you can pick if a 12yo will make it, not until 16yo will these coaches make an assesment as to wether a player has what it takes. So HAL franchises selecting U13, U14, U15 teams will only be a fishing expedition that can affect there standing at a local level when they play other local clubs. ANy incidents or poor behaviour from the HAL team by staff, parents or players will be blown up negatively and create a poor standing from the football community. Let alone all the negative vibes from the juniors that don't make it. Good points =d> =d>
|
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
rewdewa wrote:I think all A-league clubs should have their own youth set-up, from under-13s up to under-18s and they would be playing in their local league. In this case NYL would essentially become a reserve league which would allow these youth players to get more game time and train with the senior players at their club, this comp would also serve as a league that gives fringe players more game time too. You see I disagree, partly, I think the HAL Franchises should concentrate at Youth level say U16 to U21. Below that age group will cause them nothing but headaches and possibly affect their brand negatively. At junior level U15 to U7 most of our players are at a good standard, it is that "transition" stage from Youth to Senior Football were we have our major issues. At U16 and below they would be better off working co-operatively with local clubs, maybe at different support levels. E.g. 10 junior clubs at high support level, 20 junior clubs at medium support level and 40 junior clubs at loew support level. I'll also add that the majority of TOP LEVEL coaches I have spoken to have said that there is no-way you can pick if a 12yo will make it, not until 16yo will these coaches make an assesment as to wether a player has what it takes. So HAL franchises selecting U13, U14, U15 teams will only be a fishing expedition that can affect there standing at a local level when they play other local clubs. ANy incidents or poor behaviour from the HAL team by staff, parents or players will be blown up negatively and create a poor standing from the football community. Let alone all the negative vibes from the juniors that don't make it.
|
|
|
rewdewa
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 82,
Visits: 0
|
I think all A-league clubs should have their own youth set-up, from under-13s up to under-18s and they would be playing in their local league. In this case NYL would essentially become a reserve league which would allow these youth players to get more game time and train with the senior players at their club, this comp would also serve as a league that gives fringe players more game time too.
|
|
|
neverwozza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
f1dave wrote:Hmm. I agree with you in part - I am not a fan of the NTC teams playing in premier league comps. But with the youth teams, especially if they're sprinkled with one or two older heads, they are on average a bit older than the NTC group, and I think they could hold their own. This is the scenario I was talking about. The mariners youth side has Porter, Kwasnik, Musialik, Pelligrino and Pasfield in their squad at the moment. I am not sure what the OA rule is but 3-4 experienced players should be enough to help the rest of the boys compete against a more mature squad. I would like to think that the NSWPL sides would have their fair share of younger players getting a gig anyway.
|
|
|
f1dave
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:Airfares $2,500 Hotel 2 weeks $1250 accomadates 4 Barcelona $1,000 Food and transport
Free pours: priceless :lol:
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Airfares $2,500 Hotel 2 weeks $1250 accomadates 4 Barcelona $1,000 Food and transport
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Actually about 40 of our juniors are at Bacelona right now training under Barca coaches for the next two weeks. http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Road-to-Barcelona/129811937097437
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Here is one possibility http://www.cefar.com.ar/en_servicios.phpQuote:CEFAR offers its services of high competition training to: National or foreign clubs that compete in a professional level. Professional players with or without a club Amateurs players with or without a club, previously approved by the institution.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Thats less than what MVFC pays out to the coaches they sack.#-o
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
f1dave wrote:I think Krones puts up a very good idea but I somehow doubt that the costs would be as small as he makes out - putting your entire youth squad plus staff over to South America for a bunch of games? Ouch.
Buenos Aries app 200000 for a 15 player team for 3 months 2 games per week and 6 training sessions. Coaches, medics supplied. Not a bad investment.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
It's also interesting to consider this, most of the Brazilians playing in this country would have to be considered fifth or sixth rate in Brazilian terms.
And yet our youth players and domestic players do not have the technical skills of a Fred.
|
|
|
skeptic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:skeptic wrote:Aren't we already headed in the direction of the aleague youth teams playing in their respective state leagues senior grade in winter? Jets, Mariners and Sydney as examples. Or do you refer to state league youth grade? I'm not a fan of a squad of 19yo's playing in a State League, against men with stronger bodies etc. Most learning at that age is done against peers or one or two 19yo's playing in a senior team. This would be the best "learning" situation. Now see what you're alluding to and agree.
|
|
|
f1dave
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.1K,
Visits: 0
|
I think Krones puts up a very good idea but I somehow doubt that the costs would be as small as he makes out - putting your entire youth squad plus staff over to South America for a bunch of games? Ouch. Arthur wrote:skeptic wrote:Aren't we already headed in the direction of the aleague youth teams playing in their respective state leagues senior grade in winter? Jets, Mariners and Sydney as examples. Or do you refer to state league youth grade? I'm not a fan of a squad of 19yo's playing in a State League, against men with stronger bodies etc. Most learning at that age is done against peers or one or two 19yo's playing in a senior team. This would be the best "learning" situation. Hmm. I agree with you in part - I am not a fan of the NTC teams playing in premier league comps. But with the youth teams, especially if they're sprinkled with one or two older heads, they are on average a bit older than the NTC group, and I think they could hold their own.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
skeptic wrote:Aren't we already headed in the direction of the aleague youth teams playing in their respective state leagues senior grade in winter? Jets, Mariners and Sydney as examples. Or do you refer to state league youth grade? I'm not a fan of a squad of 19yo's playing in a State League, against men with stronger bodies etc. Most learning at that age is done against peers or one or two 19yo's playing in a senior team. This would be the best "learning" situation.
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:krones3 wrote:The problem as i see it is multiplied by varies denominators across Australia. We seriously need to think outside the square to completely and quickly develop our young players. The problem is that with so few talented players and local coaches the players and the coaches are facing each other over and over again. The same tired tactics the same tired faces the same tired grounds.
I think that krones has put forward a huge problem, it sounds like Victoria where everyone knows everyone especially in the so-called elite junior levels and everyone plays a similar form of fightball sorry football. It would be great to go to South America or even bring teams out here. We have talked before about having a team in Europe for our talented players to go to maybe it would be more affordable, more acceptable and more beneficial if the FFA or friends of bought a Club in Brazil as an avenue to develop our best juniors and junior coaches. The skillaroos program and the skill acquisition programs are great innovations but I have a few issues with this too, though minor. I do beleive we need to focus on improving the overal standard of junior play and culture this should improve all levels of the game. And these sort of ideas will fast track us.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
krones3 wrote:dirkvanadidas wrote:the germans are on thier 6 week break, how about inviting thier acadamies and senior teams down for some winter sun and football, make a change for them not to go malaga evry break and doesnt cost ffa. Good idea but i don't think they would come, its no challenge to them. Unfortunately until we are the best it will be us that need to travel. Well even if one German Academy came but was used as an educational tool for our local players and coaches to see how they do it. Of course we could have a scholarship system that would send coaches and players the other way as well.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
krones3 wrote:The problem as i see it is multiplied by varies denominators across Australia. We seriously need to think outside the square to completely and quickly develop our young players. The problem is that with so few talented players and local coaches the players and the coaches are facing each other over and over again. The same tired tactics the same tired faces the same tired grounds.
I think that krones has put forward a huge problem, it sounds like Victoria where everyone knows everyone especially in the so-called elite junior levels and everyone plays a similar form of fightball sorry football. It would be great to go to South America or even bring teams out here. We have talked before about having a team in Europe for our talented players to go to maybe it would be more affordable, more acceptable and more beneficial if the FFA or friends of bought a Club in Brazil as an avenue to develop our best juniors and junior coaches. The skillaroos program and the skill acquisition programs are great innovations but I have a few issues with this too, though minor. I do beleive we need to focus on improving the overal standard of junior play and culture this should improve all levels of the game.
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
dirkvanadidas wrote:the germans are on thier 6 week break, how about inviting thier acadamies and senior teams down for some winter sun and football, make a change for them not to go malaga evry break and doesnt cost ffa. Good idea but i don't think they would come, its no challenge to them. Unfortunately until we are the best it will be us that need to travel.
|
|
|
dirk vanadidas
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
the germans are on thier 6 week break, how about inviting thier acadamies and senior teams down for some winter sun and football, make a change for them not to go malaga evry break and doesnt cost ffa.
Europe is funding the war not Chelsea football club
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
The problem as i see it is multiplied by varies denominators across Australia. We seriously need to think outside the square to completely and quickly develop our young players. The problem is that with so few talented players and local coaches the players and the coaches are facing each other over and over again. The same tired tactics the same tired faces the same tired grounds. For our players and coaches to develop they must be constantly exposed to football problems that they need to overcome. I would play the NYL and then try to get teams registered in leagues or proper friendly tours in other countries. ie you could take the entire victory youth team to Argentina in Australia's winter and play friendly s against youth teams their and never play the same team in 12 weeks. The cost would be minimal, government funding could be sort and just watch and see how much improvement the team and coaches make. You could do this across south america and Africa and maybe parts of south east Asia with each youth team going to different football cultures to develop what can not be obtained here. The only thing we lack is the vision. o:)
|
|
|
skeptic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
f1dave wrote:neverwozza wrote: I would be concerned with player burnout playing year round.
As skeptic mentioned the NSW a-league youth sides are moving towards playing in the NSW premier league and that would be my preferred pathway for our up & coming youth players(16-20). Ideally it would be a 33-36 week comp which would probably pad out to 40-44 weeks with preseason & finals. The big issue will be aligning the state leagues & a-league so they run in parallel.
Sure, but that's in addition to the NYL, right? Yes, aleague youth in summer and state league in winter. Somewhere in there they need a physical and mental break and not to forget, compulsory schooling, uni, tafe or work. This is vital in my opinion and where the aleague are decades behind other sports. No school, uni, tafe or work, no youth league. I also remember the jets wanting permission to increase the paltry pay/pocket money of their youth team to cover the doubling of their workload and games ect., but were told a definite no by the ffa.
|
|
|
f1dave
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.1K,
Visits: 0
|
neverwozza wrote: I would be concerned with player burnout playing year round.
As skeptic mentioned the NSW a-league youth sides are moving towards playing in the NSW premier league and that would be my preferred pathway for our up & coming youth players(16-20). Ideally it would be a 33-36 week comp which would probably pad out to 40-44 weeks with preseason & finals. The big issue will be aligning the state leagues & a-league so they run in parallel.
Sure, but that's in addition to the NYL, right?
|
|
|
neverwozza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
f1dave wrote:neverwozza wrote:f1dave wrote:neverwozza wrote:Have the youth league play in the their respective state's premier league instead of a national competition. Should save the clubs a fortune in travel cost and (hopefully) get more exposure for the 2nd tier clubs in readiness for a true 2nd division. But the state premier leagues are not year round competitions, no? Certainly not in WA anyway. Define year round - a 33-36 week comp? Football pretty much 12 months of the year. NYL in summer, state premier in winter for example. (Yes, the seasons overlap at times but mostly not) I would be concerned with player burnout playing year round. As skeptic mentioned the NSW a-league youth sides are moving towards playing in the NSW premier league and that would be my preferred pathway for our up & coming youth players(16-20). Ideally it would be a 33-36 week comp which would probably pad out to 40-44 weeks with preseason & finals. The big issue will be aligning the state leagues & a-league so they run in parallel.
|
|
|
f1dave
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.1K,
Visits: 0
|
neverwozza wrote:f1dave wrote:neverwozza wrote:Have the youth league play in the their respective state's premier league instead of a national competition. Should save the clubs a fortune in travel cost and (hopefully) get more exposure for the 2nd tier clubs in readiness for a true 2nd division. But the state premier leagues are not year round competitions, no? Certainly not in WA anyway. Define year round - a 33-36 week comp? Football pretty much 12 months of the year. NYL in summer, state premier in winter for example. (Yes, the seasons overlap at times but mostly not)
|
|
|
skeptic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Aren't we already headed in the direction of the aleague youth teams playing in their respective state leagues senior grade in winter? Jets, Mariners and Sydney as examples. Or do you refer to state league youth grade?
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
f1dave wrote:
The Gap: National youth league sides play < 6 months a year. For the rest of this time, young footballers between the ages of 16 and 20 have to attempt to keep developing by way of their state league side (rarely a fully professional setup) or the odd youth representative match.
I ask you - all of you, not just a handful of posters, how would you solve this?
Sounds simple but this is a very difficult question. One that if I could answer would see me appointed Technical Director.
What we are talking about is how do we help young people become World Class Footballers? In Europe there is a part of the footballing community that beleives that in general Europes Football Academies CANNOT produce top class players. That is a bold statement. But is backed up in the knowledge that most of the World Class players come from Africa or South America. What they have, in those two continents, that we don't is abject poverty. That poverty creates a situation where kids to amuse and entertain themselves play Football all day every day. But in an enviroment without ADULT INTEREFERENCE.
The kids develop in around certain common denominators such as peer learning. The better and older kids end up teaching the younger and weaker players, the younger kids also learn by observation and playing against older kids. Skill is king, in African footballing circles it is not enough to just score a goal, your expected to score spectacular goals. A lot of these kids develop 7-10 moves to win a 1v1 situation our kids do well with 2-4 moves. Kids play all day with several matches yet no scoreboards, no ladders, no scorers awards, no best & fairests.
My conclusion is that maybe our kids are overcoached especially at younger age groups and we desperately need some street soccer enviroments. But we are concerned with the current older age groups 16-20yo, I only bring this up because I know most of these kids will already be behind when it comes to developing a "WORLD CLASS" player.
In Europe right now probably the best producers of talent would be Spain and Germany. One of the posters placed a link to the German Budesliga Academies, absolutely fantastic. The Germans and the Spainish generally have a common theme, the beleive in a "HOLISTIC" approach that to develop an exceptional Footballer they need to develop an exceptional Human Being. Their Academeys have high educational standards and behaviour standards. They also have some of their best qualified coaches running the Academies with many Pro-Licence UEFA A & B qualified coaches.
For us in AUstralia we now have the "chicken & egg" problem to develop more and better players we need more and better educated coaches. This being an issue I have long sprouted in these forums.
What is most beneficial for development of the kids, not the A-League or state league clubs involved?
We need to some how prepare our 16 to 20yo better for senior football. I have seen talented 16yo go off to lower league senior clubs ending up as reserves for the reserves and believing that this was a path to top level Senior Football. They don't last long and are lost to the game.
What would be beneficial for the kids would be to have access to some good career advice, open training sessions under top quality coaches and access to Sport Science.
I have to admit I like what the AFL has done in Victoria with the TAC Cup a competition in Victoria for 18yo at Clubs operated by the AFL with high quality coaches and football staff. Every year nearly 400 kids aged 16-18 have access to high performance standards.
While for our football at that age maybe 20-40 kids in total have that kind of access to coaching. And there is debate about the quality.
A) Keep the status quo.
I think we can keep what we have and build on to it. JUst maybe a bit quicker B) Collate all youth players at one club (be it the NYL side in the state league, or an existing club in partnership, ie this Inglewood Glory proposal) for 12 month full-time training.
I don't think that this is a complete answer. It may be of some use but could we gurantee that this would satisfy Perth Glory's playing requirements into the future? probably not.
We probably need some kind of high performance U18 competition and a State League based U/21 Reserves competion with requirements of coaching expertise and operation.
While open training sessions with high calibre coaches would also be of benefit.
C) Do 'something completely different' - and if so, what?
As i said keep what we have, become inovative with future directions. I think we have to find a way to get street football happening here, we have to put more resources into futsal. And we need to develop stratergies so that we are more a part of the daily life of our local schools.
Gees Dave you think you ask simple questions but that's really hard and I could have added so much more and gone into so much more detail on the points I brought up. But we have to encourage our kids to concentrate on technique, technique, technique. Its the only way our game can go forward. Do you know Sean? http://www.footballtricks.com/If I was in WA I'd put him in charge. Edited by Arthur: 10/1/2012 04:20:26 PM
|
|
|
neverwozza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
f1dave wrote:neverwozza wrote:Have the youth league play in the their respective state's premier league instead of a national competition. Should save the clubs a fortune in travel cost and (hopefully) get more exposure for the 2nd tier clubs in readiness for a true 2nd division. But the state premier leagues are not year round competitions, no? Certainly not in WA anyway. Define year round - a 33-36 week comp?
|
|
|
f1dave
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.1K,
Visits: 0
|
neverwozza wrote:Have the youth league play in the their respective state's premier league instead of a national competition. Should save the clubs a fortune in travel cost and (hopefully) get more exposure for the 2nd tier clubs in readiness for a true 2nd division. But the state premier leagues are not year round competitions, no? Certainly not in WA anyway.
|
|
|
neverwozza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Have the youth league play in the their respective state's premier league instead of a national competition. Should save the clubs a fortune in travel cost and (hopefully) get more exposure for the 2nd tier clubs in readiness for a true 2nd division. I look forward to the day when our youth teams are playing out of the boutique stadium at Tuggerah against the best the in Sydney. I think mine is option B by the way.
|
|
|