An elected president was ousted by the Army because he did not agree with their ways. This whole issue was never going to be better once Morsi was ousted.

Thats the way it works in those countries. The winner gets to execute the opponent. Morsi's government were executing opponents of democracy. And secularism. They increased their persecution of Christians.

Then the military ousted them and now it's their turn.

I'm dead against capital punishment (pardon the pun) but that's how it is over there. Just a little bigger than what the MB did when they came to power. Same shit, different government.

Thats the biggest problem. No one can actually forgive and work towards the future. It is always about retribution.

Whoops!

they've found the plane? news to me
care to provide some evidence?

Oh FFS.

Go away sharia law. You're not welcome.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10719304/How-British-satellite-company-Inmarsat-tracked-down-MH370.html

Inb4 you label this "lies" or pretend to know more about the topic than experts.

they've found the plane?

Surely Afro you're not so naive to believe that experts in their field have used ridiculous, radical concepts such as mathematics and physics to calculate the flight path and impact zone. And then having done that they've had the hide, of all things, to have it peer reviewed by other experts in the field.

Not only were they dumb enough to have it peer reviewed the morons then went to Boeing to check that their assumptions regarding the auotopilot and the airspeed were correct.

I've heard that that is how science is supposed to work but recently my eyes have been opened by a knowledgeable fellow on the 442 forum. He tells me that sources are irrelevant to an argument, studies and statistics are only useful when they support your argument, that baseless or extraordinary claims don't have to be backed up by evidence.

He also says not to worry if you get caught making an outlandish statement and get asked for proof. Just waffle away, ask a rhetorical question, say something like "I don't need a source to show you 1 + 1 = 2" and then take the moral high ground. (It's just over there near the grassy knoll.) Or you could just shout them down.

Personally I think Immarsat are a front for the Chinese secret service who secretly landed the plane in North Korea and have already interred the crew and passengers in work camps on the peninsula.

They're working on Zero point energy fields and a water powered perpetual motion engine in conjunction with a lost tribe of Israelites.



Edited by munrubenmuz: 26/3/2014 01:13:53 AM

so did they find the plane, yes or no?

They will Turbo.

This is what a pinko left winged show has to say about the state of the news in general->

https://soundcloud.com/triple-j-hack/hack-tues-25-march

No doubt this is asking for a glassing from Kyle and Jackie O fans, but this bit of news is the first time in a long time anything has made sense

but they havent
so you lied

another 442 :^o

At the moment, given the evidence, it suggests the plane landed in the Indian Ocean South West of Perth.

That's how science works. They have a hypothesis, they look for and collect evidence, they make a postulation based on the evidence available, they peer review it, they check it and then they publish it.

Should further evidence become available that contradicts their findings then they will adjust the postulation.

For a 'science degree' holder you have a pretty poor grasp of the scientific method.

just stop embarrassing yourself please =;

Getting closer.

http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/france-spots-122-objects-in-indian-ocean-where-search-resumes-for-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370/story-fnizu68q-1226864848018
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-26/malaysia-airlines-mh370-122-new-objects-spotted-in-search/5347924
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/26/mh370-search-fleet-grows-as-everything-thrown-at-this-riddle

so have they found the plane yet link spammer?

Edited by ricecrackers: 27/3/2014 10:36:55 AM

The plane has been found. Its been confirmed.

thats great, ...by whom?

Derp post.

-PB

Edited by paulbagzFC: 27/3/2014 11:14:05 AM

I don't need to post references to explain 1+1 = 2



You must admit, you walked right into that one. ;)

actually you failed because i never asked you to post a link or reference, merely asked who provided confirmation to which you referred

do you see how your comprehension failed you?

I guess when they find plane, and they will, you'll split hairs and say the found "wreckage" which technically isn't a "plane".

Sorry about all the links. I know evidence can be annoying when it doesn't support your position.

its not evidence of anything unless they find the plane
have they found it yet?

They will and you will look as foolish as your prediction 2 pages ago.

what did i predict?

and tell me, how did the plane get to the southern Indian Ocean?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_(force)

Edited by afromanGT: 27/3/2014 08:26:03 PM

^^^^ As you know I am "certifiably insane" and comprehension is not my strong suit but the above seems to suggest that you think/thought that it is "likely false" that wreckage won't be found in waters 4 hours from Perth.

I assume in a smarmy, know it all tone but that's just speculation. I have no proof of that.

Are you serious? Presumably you've heard of a little search engine called 'google'.

Try typing in 'MH370' and see how you go.

Don't bother . Guy is just a plain old twat .