|
RobB
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 726,
Visits: 0
|
robbos wrote:Mister Football wrote:Gyfox wrote:Mister Football wrote:Crusader wrote: Take Melbourne away and what are you left with? 6 teams, 2 jokes and small base of juniors of fans. The VFL is a paper tiger. HAL teams have played many teams that are global giants, bigger than your entire sport, such as Rangers....Olympiakos, Urawa etc. What is the biggest team from outside your league a VFLteam has ever played. Werribee, Bendigo? Rangers are that big? Are they the ones who went into liquidation last year? Rangers went bust on a revenue stream of around US$125m. Makes you wonder. They used to sit at the bottom end or just outside the top 25 Association Football clubs in the world according to Forbes on nett worth. Obviously I know all about Rangers, but the original comment was that Rangers was bigger than all of Australian Football. Now people on this forum might think that the AFL is small in world terms, but the annual revenue of the AFL and its 18 clubs combined still exceeds $1 billion, and clearly that is more than Rangers' annual revenue (by many multiples). True but at present Rangers are in the 4th Tier football in Scotland now. I'm sure when they are back to the top tier in a few years, they will again exceed the whole AFL. Why are you guys in this conversation. He knows everything you say is right, it's just an ever circling vortex of pulling your chains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Mister Football wrote:petszk wrote:southmelb wrote:...the system has been designed to make them a powerhouse... This fact will help steer any genuine sports fans away from the farce that is the AFL. I'm sure if he thought he could get away with it, Vlad would introduce a rule that says a goal by GWS is worth 12 points, and a miss worth 2. Edited by petszk: 10/1/2013 01:45:01 AM What if the FFA-owned WSW wins the championship in its very first season. Isn't that a bit farcical? It certainly would be a farce, *if* the FFA implemented rules such as "WSW can have their pick of the best players from any other A-League side", or "A win to WSW is worth 4 points on the league table". Someone else compared the AFL to the WWE in terms of orchestrating results. They (probably) don't go the WWE levels, but they are certainly further down that track than any other sporting organisation on the planet.
|
|
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Ground sharing is almost non-existent in top tier European football. It's stock standard in AFL.
|
|
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Mister Football wrote:Crusader wrote:Clinton wrote:petszk wrote:southmelb wrote:...the system has been designed to make them a powerhouse... This fact will help steer any genuine sports fans away from the farce that is the AFL. I'm sure if he thought he could get away with it, Vlad would introduce a rule that says a goal by GWS is worth 12 points, and a miss worth 2. Edited by petszk: 10/1/2013 01:45:01 AM This is why the AFL isn't a true sport, the league winners are planned in advance by their corporate office. Next you will be telling me that WWE isn't a real sport. A pity the AFL lacks the integrity of the K-League (and dozens of other soccer leagues around the world, including super powers such as Italy and Germany). You seem to be confused between corruption/match fixing at player/refereeing/coaching levels which is condemned and punished when found, and the actual league governing body itself changing the rules for teams it decides it wants to do well. Indeed the former also occurs in the AFL ("tanking", anyone?), except for the "condemned and punished when found" bit.
|
|
|
|
|
Swarth
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.9K,
Visits: 0
|
petszk wrote:Mister Football wrote:petszk wrote:southmelb wrote:...the system has been designed to make them a powerhouse... This fact will help steer any genuine sports fans away from the farce that is the AFL. I'm sure if he thought he could get away with it, Vlad would introduce a rule that says a goal by GWS is worth 12 points, and a miss worth 2. Edited by petszk: 10/1/2013 01:45:01 AM What if the FFA-owned WSW wins the championship in its very first season. Isn't that a bit farcical? It certainly would be a farce, *if* the FFA implemented rules such as "WSW can have their pick of the best players from any other A-League side", or "A win to WSW is worth 4 points on the league table". Someone else compared the AFL to the WWE in terms of orchestrating results. They (probably) don't go the WWE levels, but they are certainly further down that track than any other sporting organisation on the planet. i really cant stand the AFL for many reasons but this being a main reason its so manufactured and plastic
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
RobB wrote:robbos wrote:Mister Football wrote:Gyfox wrote:Mister Football wrote:Crusader wrote: Take Melbourne away and what are you left with? 6 teams, 2 jokes and small base of juniors of fans. The VFL is a paper tiger. HAL teams have played many teams that are global giants, bigger than your entire sport, such as Rangers....Olympiakos, Urawa etc. What is the biggest team from outside your league a VFLteam has ever played. Werribee, Bendigo? Rangers are that big? Are they the ones who went into liquidation last year? Rangers went bust on a revenue stream of around US$125m. Makes you wonder. They used to sit at the bottom end or just outside the top 25 Association Football clubs in the world according to Forbes on nett worth. Obviously I know all about Rangers, but the original comment was that Rangers was bigger than all of Australian Football. Now people on this forum might think that the AFL is small in world terms, but the annual revenue of the AFL and its 18 clubs combined still exceeds $1 billion, and clearly that is more than Rangers' annual revenue (by many multiples). True but at present Rangers are in the 4th Tier football in Scotland now. I'm sure when they are back to the top tier in a few years, they will again exceed the whole AFL. Why are you guys in this conversation. He knows everything you say is right, it's just an ever circling vortex of pulling your chains. Every man deserves an education. Mister football deserves it as much any AFL fan. We need to educate him on the ways of the world, beyond the little pond he swims in!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
orexxis
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 33,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:If ALF was truly any good it would have made inroads overseas by now. One can't say 150 years isn't enough.
Not even in New Zealand where cricket ovals suitable for ALF are plentiful have they been able to make inroads, or in London where at any one time there are 300,000 expats living there.
Let's go to South Africa shall we where ALF hands out freebees to these poor village kids so they can kick an egg around for the cameras. And in the back ground you will notice other kids watching whilst wearing a football club's shirt from various parts of the world.
They've tried China I believe or going to? The Chinese attitude would be thanks but don't call us but we'll call you? So polite are those Chinese.
Where to next, India? Good luck.
I guess I'm being a bit rude here calling it ALF. It's AFL. Unfortunately for many it may as well represent Australia's Funniest League.
Edited by paulc: 10/1/2013 12:18:36 PM Actually, if you knew anything about the history of sport, you’d know that codes inevitably spread with imperial influences, and migration. When people essentially take over another people, or move in great numbers, they take their game with them, and the local population grows from there. It’s not like a bunch of people have sat back in each country and thought hmm, this looks like the best sport, we’re going to choose this to be obsessed with. It’s in no way a reflection of the games themselves. Look at cricket – do you think it’s a coincidence that it’s a near religion in some nations, whilst others have never heard of it? Do you think it’s a reflection on the game? 1 billion Indians are simply wrong re the qualities of cricket, or 300 million Americans are wrong? Australia hasn’t invaded or conquered any new lands and isn’t going to anytime soon. That’s why the game remains largely indigenous. It’s just the way it is. If Australia had been colonised in the same way, but long after football was codified and organised in England, then football would likely dominate here. It just didn’t happen that way. It’s in no way a reflection on the game itself.
|
|
|
|
|
orexxis
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 33,
Visits: 0
|
Crusader wrote:Mister Football wrote:orexxis wrote: I like both sports but FWIW I think the AFL punches well above its weight for a local game. In terms of average attendance it’s the fourth highest sports league on the planet behind the NFL, Bundesliga and Premier League. There’s plenty of factors such as stadium size that go into this, but for a country of our size it’s pretty impressive.
Very true, impressive for a country whose small population is spread out across a large land mass. Yes but the overwhelming majority of those fans are in one city. One well placed nuke, plague or a cultural shift and the game of VFL would no longer exist. Take Melbourne away and what are you left with? 6 teams, 2 jokes and small base of juniors of fans. The VFL is a paper tiger. HAL teams have played many teams that are global giants, bigger than your entire sport, such as Rangers, Celtic, Blackburn, Juventus, Olympiakos, Urawa etc. What is the biggest team from outside your league a VFLteam has ever played. Werribee, Bendigo? Again, all irrelevant in a discussion about Western Sydney. All you’re banging on about is things happening in Europe, that most of the people in western Sydney have no idea about anyway. If you think that your average bum in western Sydney knows much more about the EPL, SPL or Serie A than they do the AFL, you’re sadly mistaken. The chip on your shoulder is a full-size potato. You’re exactly the same as the bogans who bang on about footy and sokkah. You’re just on the other side of the fence, throwing exactly the same shit back and forth. Edited by orexxis: 10/1/2013 04:14:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
orexxis wrote:paulc wrote:If ALF was truly any good it would have made inroads overseas by now. One can't say 150 years isn't enough.
Not even in New Zealand where cricket ovals suitable for ALF are plentiful have they been able to make inroads, or in London where at any one time there are 300,000 expats living there.
Let's go to South Africa shall we where ALF hands out freebees to these poor village kids so they can kick an egg around for the cameras. And in the back ground you will notice other kids watching whilst wearing a football club's shirt from various parts of the world.
They've tried China I believe or going to? The Chinese attitude would be thanks but don't call us but we'll call you? So polite are those Chinese.
Where to next, India? Good luck.
I guess I'm being a bit rude here calling it ALF. It's AFL. Unfortunately for many it may as well represent Australia's Funniest League.
Edited by paulc: 10/1/2013 12:18:36 PM Actually, if you knew anything about the history of sport, you’d know that codes inevitably spread with imperial influences, and migration. When people essentially take over another people, or move in great numbers, they take their game with them, and the local population grows from there. It’s not like a bunch of people have sat back in each country and thought hmm, this looks like the best sport, we’re going to choose this to be obsessed with. It’s in no way a reflection of the games themselves. Look at cricket – do you think it’s a coincidence that it’s a near religion in some nations, whilst others have never heard of it? Do you think it’s a reflection on the game? 1 billion Indians are simply wrong re the qualities of cricket, or 300 million Americans are wrong? Australia hasn’t invaded or conquered any new lands and isn’t going to anytime soon. That’s why the game remains largely indigenous. It’s just the way it is. If Australia had been colonised in the same way, but long after football was codified and organised in England, then football would likely dominate here. It just didn’t happen that way. It’s in no way a reflection on the game itself. Funny you should say that, has football & cricket comes from imperial England & yet only football took off around the world & cricket did not. Also when you think of the imperial England, the colonial countries like US, Australia, Canada & New Zealand comes to mind, yet most of those did not fully take up football, yes football is the most popular sport in the world where the English did not have the influence it had on those countries mentioned above. Please explain. Edited by robbos: 10/1/2013 04:20:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
orexxis wrote: All you’re banging on about is things happening in Europe, that most of the people in western Sydney have no idea about anyway. If you think that your average bum in western Sydney knows much more about the EPL, SPL or Serie A than they do the AFL, you’re sadly mistaken.
Edited by orexxis: 10/1/2013 04:14:46 PM Now we know you are a AFL stooge. Only arrogant AFL person would think that Judd, Franklin, Ablett & I struggle after that would be bigger than Ronaldo, Messi, Rooney, van Pirese, Inesita, Xavi, Falcao, & I could go on & on in West Sydney.
|
|
|
|
|
Crusader
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
orexxis wrote: All you’re banging on about is things happening in Europe, that most of the people in western Sydney have no idea about anyway. If you think that your average bum in western Sydney knows much more about the EPL, SPL or Serie A than they do the AFL, you’re sadly mistaken.
You must be a Mexican. The average person in Sydney would know a lot more about the EPL than the VFL. Most of my mates follow the NRL, but know the clubs, stars and results of the EPL. The VFL gets about as much attention as curling, lacrosse and vigoro.
|
|
|
|
|
Crusader
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
petszk wrote:Mister Football wrote:petszk wrote:southmelb wrote:...the system has been designed to make them a powerhouse... This fact will help steer any genuine sports fans away from the farce that is the AFL. I'm sure if he thought he could get away with it, Vlad would introduce a rule that says a goal by GWS is worth 12 points, and a miss worth 2. Edited by petszk: 10/1/2013 01:45:01 AM What if the FFA-owned WSW wins the championship in its very first season. Isn't that a bit farcical? It certainly would be a farce, *if* the FFA implemented rules such as "WSW can have their pick of the best players from any other A-League side", or "A win to WSW is worth 4 points on the league table". Someone else compared the AFL to the WWE in terms of orchestrating results. They (probably) don't go the WWE levels, but they are certainly further down that track than any other sporting organisation on the planet. The VFL rewards teams for playing badly but cannot figure out why teams play badly on purpose. The results are decided by Demetriou, and he does not like it when the clubs turn their hands to match-fixing, that is his job. http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/watch-the-key-moments-from-the-match-at-the-centre-of-melbourne-tanking-allegations/story-fnelctok-1226550586110
|
|
|
|
|
orexxis
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 33,
Visits: 0
|
robbos wrote:orexxis wrote:paulc wrote:If ALF was truly any good it would have made inroads overseas by now. One can't say 150 years isn't enough.
Not even in New Zealand where cricket ovals suitable for ALF are plentiful have they been able to make inroads, or in London where at any one time there are 300,000 expats living there.
Let's go to South Africa shall we where ALF hands out freebees to these poor village kids so they can kick an egg around for the cameras. And in the back ground you will notice other kids watching whilst wearing a football club's shirt from various parts of the world.
They've tried China I believe or going to? The Chinese attitude would be thanks but don't call us but we'll call you? So polite are those Chinese.
Where to next, India? Good luck.
I guess I'm being a bit rude here calling it ALF. It's AFL. Unfortunately for many it may as well represent Australia's Funniest League.
Edited by paulc: 10/1/2013 12:18:36 PM Actually, if you knew anything about the history of sport, you’d know that codes inevitably spread with imperial influences, and migration. When people essentially take over another people, or move in great numbers, they take their game with them, and the local population grows from there. It’s not like a bunch of people have sat back in each country and thought hmm, this looks like the best sport, we’re going to choose this to be obsessed with. It’s in no way a reflection of the games themselves. Look at cricket – do you think it’s a coincidence that it’s a near religion in some nations, whilst others have never heard of it? Do you think it’s a reflection on the game? 1 billion Indians are simply wrong re the qualities of cricket, or 300 million Americans are wrong? Australia hasn’t invaded or conquered any new lands and isn’t going to anytime soon. That’s why the game remains largely indigenous. It’s just the way it is. If Australia had been colonised in the same way, but long after football was codified and organised in England, then football would likely dominate here. It just didn’t happen that way. It’s in no way a reflection on the game itself. Funny you should say that, has football & cricket comes from imperial England & yet only football took off around the world & cricket did not. Also when you think of the imperial England, the colonial countries like US, Australia, Canada & New Zealand comes to mind, yet most of those did not fully take up football, yes football is the most popular sport in the world where the English did not have the influence it had on those countries mentioned above. Please explain. Edited by robbos: 10/1/2013 04:20:13 PM Football is a relatively young sport, it’s growth is something of a cultural phenomenon, definitely. The English had done most of their exploring, raping and pillaging long before it become codified and organised. From what I’ve read it’s spread across Europe was pretty rapid, kind of in line with rapid improvements in mobility and trade across England and into Europe. There’s no doubt the English took it into Europe. I think (though I have nothing to back it up) that the sheer simplicity of the game would have helped it’s spread across Europe as well. It’s part of the beauty of the game, it’s very uncomplicated in the sense that anyone could probably watch people playing it for 10 minutes and pick up the basic premise – put it in the goal and don’t use your hands. Reckon that would have helped it spread quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
williamn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
all hail mr football and the afl for keeping our economy afloat.
|
|
|
|
|
Swarth
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.9K,
Visits: 0
|
is anyone a fan of both WSW and GWS equally? i am just curious to hear the feeling surrounding both clubs from someone who isnt biased
|
|
|
|
|
orexxis
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 33,
Visits: 0
|
robbos wrote:orexxis wrote: All you’re banging on about is things happening in Europe, that most of the people in western Sydney have no idea about anyway. If you think that your average bum in western Sydney knows much more about the EPL, SPL or Serie A than they do the AFL, you’re sadly mistaken.
Edited by orexxis: 10/1/2013 04:14:46 PM Now we know you are a AFL stooge. Only arrogant AFL person would think that Judd, Franklin, Ablett & I struggle after that would be bigger than Ronaldo, Messi, Rooney, van Pirese, Inesita, Xavi, Falcao, & I could go on & on in West Sydney. I actually don’t think they would. They’d know the big 5 or 10 names obviously, they’re global stars on a stage the AFL will never emulate. There’s dedicated football fans who’d know the European game backwards, that’d be the 15k or 20k who follow WSW. Not the majority of people who live in western Sydney. Aside from them, I don’t think most people would know too much about the European Leagues. A few club names that are global brands yeah, but I reckon they’d reel off a few big AFL clubs too. Like everybody in Melbourne could with the NRL, even though very few actively follow it. Anybody who knows more than a bit probably has more than a passing interest in sport and knows a little bit about the AFL, whether or not they follow it. LOL, don’t even try to tell me that if somebody put a gun to your head you couldn’t name 10 AFL players and clubs, that’s just bullshit. I can assure you I’m not a stooge for anything in particular.
|
|
|
|
|
orexxis
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 33,
Visits: 0
|
Swarth wrote:is anyone a fan of both WSW and GWS equally? i am just curious to hear the feeling surrounding both clubs from someone who isnt biased I’m a member of both Victory and Essendon, which I reckon makes me a fair bit more balanced than many around here seem to be.
|
|
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
Swarth wrote:is anyone a fan of both WSW and GWS equally? i am just curious to hear the feeling surrounding both clubs from someone who isnt biased Your first hurdle
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
orexxis wrote: Football is a relatively young sport, it’s growth is something of a cultural phenomenon, definitely. The English had done most of their exploring, raping and pillaging long before it become codified and organised.or b
From what I’ve read it’s spread across Europe was pretty rapid, kind of in line with rapid improvements in mobility and trade across England and into Europe. There’s no doubt the English took it into Europe.
I think (though I have nothing to back it up) that the sheer simplicity of the game would have helped it’s spread across Europe as well. It’s part of the beauty of the game, it’s very uncomplicated in the sense that anyone could probably watch people playing it for 10 minutes and pick up the basic premise – put it in the goal and don’t use your hands. Reckon that would have helped it spread quickly.
Oh thanks for explaining, it's the complexity of AFL that didn't allow it to travel, you can use your hands, there are no offsides, you drop the ball & it's not a knock on, it's agg shape ball so luck plays a part to the roll, you get a point for missing & playing a complex game. It's seems AFL's a game that favours those without much skill & allows for mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
orexxis wrote:Swarth wrote:is anyone a fan of both WSW and GWS equally? i am just curious to hear the feeling surrounding both clubs from someone who isnt biased I’m a member of both Victory and Essendon, which I reckon makes me a fair bit more balanced than many around here seem to be. I'm a member of SFC & have seen many Wallabies & Waratahs matches over the years & I also follow St George in Rugby League & was there when they won their last GF, so that makes me even more balanced than you. Also I'm from Sydney.
|
|
|
|
|
Swarth
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.9K,
Visits: 0
|
aufc_ole wrote:Swarth wrote:is anyone a fan of both WSW and GWS equally? i am just curious to hear the feeling surrounding both clubs from someone who isnt biased Your first hurdle lol :P i am just curious if there is a different feeling surrounding the clubs atm i know for me anyways WSW has so much energy and excitement surrounding it atm
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
orexxis wrote:robbos wrote:orexxis wrote: All you’re banging on about is things happening in Europe, that most of the people in western Sydney have no idea about anyway. If you think that your average bum in western Sydney knows much more about the EPL, SPL or Serie A than they do the AFL, you’re sadly mistaken.
Edited by orexxis: 10/1/2013 04:14:46 PM Now we know you are a AFL stooge. Only arrogant AFL person would think that Judd, Franklin, Ablett & I struggle after that would be bigger than Ronaldo, Messi, Rooney, van Pirese, Inesita, Xavi, Falcao, & I could go on & on in West Sydney. I actually don’t think they would. They’d know the big 5 or 10 names obviously, they’re global stars on a stage the AFL will never emulate. There’s dedicated football fans who’d know the European game backwards, that’d be the 15k or 20k who follow WSW. Not the majority of people who live in western Sydney. Aside from them, I don’t think most people would know too much about the European Leagues. A few club names that are global brands yeah, but I reckon they’d reel off a few big AFL clubs too. Like everybody in Melbourne could with the NRL, even though very few actively follow it. Anybody who knows more than a bit probably has more than a passing interest in sport and knows a little bit about the AFL, whether or not they follow it. LOL, don’t even try to tell me that if somebody put a gun to your head you couldn’t name 10 AFL players and clubs, that’s just bullshit. I can assure you I’m not a stooge for anything in particular. Ok let me give you a couple of examples. Carlton & Collingwood comes to GWS the crowd is 15K at most in a real competition. Man U comes for a practice game in Sydney & they sell out in 3 mins in an 80K stadium. To try to get more bums on seats AFL signs a Rugby League player for $2M a year. To try to get more bums on seats FFA signs an aging football champion from Europe for $2M a year. The AFL is ahead of the A-League in Sydney, but Football would easily be 20 times more popular than Aussie rules in Sydney, don't get fooled by your media. AFL in Sydney is only sightly bigger than Rugby (both) in Melbourne. How many RL players can you name?
|
|
|
|
|
Justafan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Mister Football wrote:sobkowski wrote:Mister Football wrote:sobkowski wrote:Mister Football wrote:Crusader wrote: Take Melbourne away and what are you left with? 6 teams, 2 jokes and small base of juniors of fans. The VFL is a paper tiger. HAL teams have played many teams that are global giants, bigger than your entire sport, such as Rangers....Olympiakos, Urawa etc. What is the biggest team from outside your league a VFLteam has ever played. Werribee, Bendigo? Rangers are that big? Are they the ones who went into liquidation last year? More people know of Rangers than of collingwood magpies. You're probably right there, although interestingly, I was just looking at this wikipedia page which shows the biggest attendances of clubs across all of the football codes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_club_attendances_(2012)Rangers is amongst the top 20 soccer clubs in the world at 46,324, but it's behind both Collingwood (59,799) and Essendon (47,698). Edited by Mister Football: 10/1/2013 02:16:53 PM collingwood and essendon pull more people than Rangers. Yes. Rangers only average around 45,000. Yes. Could this have anything to do with Ibrox stadium maxxing out at 50,000 seats? Possibly. Essendon plays at Etihad which has a capacity of around 52,000. If you are implying that Essendon play all their home games at Etihad which is basically at capacity each time, then this would be incorrect as we know the AFL moves the bigger drawing games to the MCG, in fact Essendon's biggest 3 "home" games for 2012 were at the MCG and every 2 years you can include the ANZAC Day game as well (not for 2012 that was Collingwood). Link: http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tg-essendon-bombersThe biggest issue facing the AFL is the equity in the draw as not all teams play each other once and some twice but not all. The bigger Melbourne teams always get to play each other twice though as a way for the AFL to maximize crowds. Larger European clubs tend to achieve a steadier crowd throughout the season at their home grounds i.e. their grounds are close or at capacity for most games. I think this should be the aim of WSW to try to achieve close to capacity at Parramatta before moving say the derby to a larger stadium such as ANZ to maximize crowds in the future and create that strong home ground advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
orexxis
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 33,
Visits: 0
|
robbos wrote:orexxis wrote: Football is a relatively young sport, it’s growth is something of a cultural phenomenon, definitely. The English had done most of their exploring, raping and pillaging long before it become codified and organised.or b
From what I’ve read it’s spread across Europe was pretty rapid, kind of in line with rapid improvements in mobility and trade across England and into Europe. There’s no doubt the English took it into Europe.
I think (though I have nothing to back it up) that the sheer simplicity of the game would have helped it’s spread across Europe as well. It’s part of the beauty of the game, it’s very uncomplicated in the sense that anyone could probably watch people playing it for 10 minutes and pick up the basic premise – put it in the goal and don’t use your hands. Reckon that would have helped it spread quickly.
Oh thanks for explaining, it's the complexity of AFL that didn't allow it to travel, you can use your hands, there are no offsides, you drop the ball & it's not a knock on, it's agg shape ball so luck plays a part to the roll, you get a point for missing & playing a complex game. It's seems AFL's a game that favours those without much skill & allows for mistakes. No doubt a factor, same with the rugbys and gridiron. I don’t really believe in the skill argument, playing AFL effectively takes a lot of skill. But there’s no doubt it’s a very physical game the game favours the tall and strong, whereas football is more accommodating of all sizes.
|
|
|
|
|
orexxis
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 33,
Visits: 0
|
robbos wrote:orexxis wrote:Swarth wrote:is anyone a fan of both WSW and GWS equally? i am just curious to hear the feeling surrounding both clubs from someone who isnt biased I’m a member of both Victory and Essendon, which I reckon makes me a fair bit more balanced than many around here seem to be. I'm a member of SFC & have seen many Wallabies & Waratahs matches over the years & I also follow St George in Rugby League & was there when they won their last GF, so that makes me even more balanced than you. Also I'm from Sydney. I can assure you all we ever hear is that western Sydney is not Sydney! And yes, I could well and truly name 10 NRL players. Probably 30 or so. OK I’m out for now. I see your points.
|
|
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
orexxis wrote:paulc wrote:If ALF was truly any good it would have made inroads overseas by now. One can't say 150 years isn't enough.
Not even in New Zealand where cricket ovals suitable for ALF are plentiful have they been able to make inroads, or in London where at any one time there are 300,000 expats living there.
Let's go to South Africa shall we where ALF hands out freebees to these poor village kids so they can kick an egg around for the cameras. And in the back ground you will notice other kids watching whilst wearing a football club's shirt from various parts of the world.
They've tried China I believe or going to? The Chinese attitude would be thanks but don't call us but we'll call you? So polite are those Chinese.
Where to next, India? Good luck.
I guess I'm being a bit rude here calling it ALF. It's AFL. Unfortunately for many it may as well represent Australia's Funniest League.
Edited by paulc: 10/1/2013 12:18:36 PM Actually, if you knew anything about the history of sport, you’d know that codes inevitably spread with imperial influences, and migration. When people essentially take over another people, or move in great numbers, they take their game with them, and the local population grows from there. It’s not like a bunch of people have sat back in each country and thought hmm, this looks like the best sport, we’re going to choose this to be obsessed with. It’s in no way a reflection of the games themselves. Look at cricket – do you think it’s a coincidence that it’s a near religion in some nations, whilst others have never heard of it? Do you think it’s a reflection on the game? 1 billion Indians are simply wrong re the qualities of cricket, or 300 million Americans are wrong? Australia hasn’t invaded or conquered any new lands and isn’t going to anytime soon. That’s why the game remains largely indigenous. It’s just the way it is. If Australia had been colonised in the same way, but long after football was codified and organised in England, then football would likely dominate here. It just didn’t happen that way. It’s in no way a reflection on the game itself. England didn't occupy every country on this planet mate, and yet immense growth in world football continues. Rugby and Rugby League also started in England and have been around for just about as long as football. Where is their growth? Haven't the Poms given these sports are fair run (unlike the eggball bogan run councils, govts and media here)? As for your ALF, 150 years and all you have achieved is a costly venture into two other states with people still more interested in watching Iron Chef than ALF. The venture was created by ALF itself, forced upon the masses and nothing natural about its inclusion. Sorry to bringing some reality into the argument. Edited by paulc: 10/1/2013 05:13:32 PM
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
T-UNIT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Swarth wrote:is anyone a fan of both WSW and GWS equally? i am just curious to hear the feeling surrounding both clubs from someone who isnt biased GWS have fans?? :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
WSWanderers
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 61,
Visits: 0
|
Indoor Soccer globally is bigger then AFL.
|
|
|
|
|
WSWanderers
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 61,
Visits: 0
|
T-UNIT wrote:Swarth wrote:is anyone a fan of both WSW and GWS equally? i am just curious to hear the feeling surrounding both clubs from someone who isnt biased GWS have fans?? :lol: Yes, latte sipping westies (wow contradiction!), who get free tickets week in week out!
|
|
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
robbos wrote: Oh thanks for explaining, it's the complexity of AFL that didn't allow it to travel, you can use your hands, there are no offsides, you drop the ball & it's not a knock on, it's agg shape ball so luck plays a part to the roll, you get a point for missing & playing a complex game. It's seems AFL's a game that favours those without much skill & allows for mistakes.
I once heard it described by someone seeing it for the first time as "The footballing equivalent of 10 pin bowling with the gutter-guards up". Gave me a chuckle. Edited by petszk: 10/1/2013 06:20:55 PM
|
|
|
|