POLICE charged a Sri Lankan asylum seeker over the alleged indecent assault of a university student, as it emerged the federal government has given the Red Cross $265 million for asylum seekers.

The 21-year-old was on a bridging visa, immigration officials confirmed after he was arrested near Central Station at 10.15am. He was later charged with aggravated break and enter and aggravated indecent assault.

It was revealed that police were not called by Macquarie University after a 20-year-old student was allegedly attacked in campus accommodation last Thursday.

There were 55 asylum seekers living in the student accommodation at the time of the attack. Asylum seekers have also been placed at the University of Western Sydney by the Red Cross, but those at Macquarie will leave by the end of next month, it was announced yesterday.

The charged man was believed to be visiting other asylum seekers at the campus but did not live there.

A security guard arrived at the housing block within minutes of the 3.20am incident but failed to call police, with the company which manages the accommodation declining to answer questions about the specific time police were called.

A university spokeswoman said "security protocol was not followed in the initial reporting of this incident to police."

Macquarie University claimed police were called by accommodation provider Campus Living at 7.40am, however police records show the call was not made until 9.56am.

One asylum seeker commits sexual assault, makes headlines on daily terrorgraph.

Thousands of Australian Citizens commit sexual assault. Nobody says boo.

One asylum seeker commits sexual assault, makes headlines on daily terrorgraph.

Thousands of Australian Citizens commit sexual assault. Nobody says boo.

One sexual assault is too many you dope

What makes news is that 80 asylum seekers were placed in accommodation on University campus and department of immigration denied for a year (laid) about it this resulted in a female student been sexually assaulted. Female students were complaining about immigrant’s behaviour for a while but no notice was taken and nothing was done about it.Denial about the problem by the department of immigration and university authorities.

35 000 illegal’s arrived in Australia since Labour abandoned Lib’s policy that stoped illegal boats, that is entire town of Dubbo living on the welfare.

Keep on working fellow Australians and pay your taxes

You're post had substance/my attention up until the bold.

-PB

When did it become illegal to seek asylum ? Also what afro was saying an Australian citizen can commit rape but he papers hardly report it .

Man...you guys are asshats.

They come over here seeking asylum (not illegal). They get put on welfare, you complain that they spend their lives on welfare. These get given education so that they DON'T spend their entire lives on welfare, and you're STILL complaining.

My point before was, how many of those reported sexual assaults are front page news? Sweet fuck all unless someone famous is involved. It's bullshit double-standards at its finest.

My point before was, how many of those reported sexual assaults are front page news? Sweet fuck all unless someone famous is involved. It's bullshit double-standards at its finest.

I'm not so sure that's right. From today's paper:
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/woman-dragged-to-creek-sexually-assaulted-by-two-attackers-20130227-2f4on.html
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/teens-molest-woman-20130226-2f46c.html

And yes, I do want our country to reserve the right to decide who is allowed into Australia and who isn't. Our immigration policy shouldn't be dictated by people in boats who can afford the fee, the smugglers who make a living off them and the Indo politicians who turn a blind eye for some substantial kickbacks.

Plane truth about boat people

WE are not being flooded by refugees. Australia's borders are not under threat. There is no armada of boats preparing to sail our way.

And despite everything Kevin Rudd, Malcolm Turnbull and Wilson Tuckey claim in the present hysterical fuss about asylum-seekers, there is one very important truth to remember. This issue is pure politics and both sides are fudging the truth.

No matter how much our politicans fret and fight, there is no reason for Australians to panic about refugees, asylum-seekers, or immigration.

As The Sunday Telegraph reports today, a close analysis of statistics yields several important facts about the real refugee situation in Australia.

The Government and Opposition don't want you to focus on these statistics because they undermine the parties' opportunities to exploit fear and misunderstanding for their own gain.

But the truth is this: the vast majority of the 13,500 asylum-seekers who come to Australia this year will be processed through the formal structures of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees.

A little more than a third of them (about 4700 last year) will arrive through our airports on legitimate tourist and business visas and then make claims for asylum while they are on Australian soil.

And a fraction - only 161 people last year, and likely to be closer to 2000 this year - will arrive by boat.

If Australia has any refugee ``problem'', it is plane-people, not boat-people. What's more, the people who arrive by boat are far more likely to be genuine refugees than those people who arrive by plane.

Immigration Department figures show between 85 and 90 per cent of boat people are found to be genuine, compared with between 40 and 60 per cent of plane people.

It's important to remember why these people come to Australia. We are the only country in this region to have promised to protect refugees; we signed the United Nations 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol.

We have accepted that as a stable, safe, peaceful nation, we have a duty to help the world solve the problem of 42 million people who have fled their homes because of war, gross violation of human rights, political persecution, torture and tyranny.

That is a serious obligation and it means that some of those displaced people will take us at our word. They will come here, seeking protection. And we have a duty to treat them _ perhaps for the first time in their lives _ with dignity and humanity.

All that is happening, quietly and smoothly. The boats arriving in Australia's waters are diverted to Christmas Island.

The asylum-seekers are processed (not as quickly as the Government has promised, but within 90 days in 75 per cent of cases) and then either released to live in the Australian community if they are genuine, or deported if they are not.

In regard to plane people, they are granted bridging visas, and allowed to live in the community and work to feed themselves while their claims are processed.

In about half of cases, they are found to be non-genuine, and are deported. So what is all this fuss about? Why is Kevin Rudd beating his chest about being tough on people-smuggling? Why is he rushing to shower Indonesia with money?

Because he thinks you, the voters, are fearful about asylum-seekers and he wants to exploit that fear.

He is performing for your benefit and the benefit of all those Labor Party members who remember what happened in 2001, when Kim Beazley found himself wedged into a very uncomfortable corner.

Mr Beazley was panicked by John Howard's "tough'' rhetoric on boat people, and lost the respect of conservative Australians, who thought he was too weak, and liberal Australians, who thought he was too cowardly to articulate an alternative to Howard's.
Mr Rudd has chosen Howard's way, confirming - if there were any doubt - that our PM learnt well the lessons of Mr Howard's victory and Mr Beazley's demise: populism always trumps principle.

- See more at: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/plane-truth-about-boat-people/story-e6frewt0-1225790871733#sthash.ybJn6sqv.dpuf

Here is a 3 year old article that's still true today. Its ridiculous when you consider that football fans see through bias media when reporting on our sport, but can't seem to believe they'd do the same with anything else.

I personally find it disgusting that politicians are willing to use these people as political tool. Its a disgrace.

Article is about a rapist. Still OK to discuss if we should let him stay in the country?

Not really champ. When it's a person who is trying to become an Australian citizen and rapes an Australian citizen in the meantime it's a different scenario.

I don't really want to invite a rapist into my house.

And yes, I do want our country to reserve the right to decide who is allowed into Australia and who isn't. Our immigration policy shouldn't be dictated by people in boats who can afford the fee, the smugglers who make a living off them and the Indo politicians who turn a blind eye for some substantial kickbacks.

I don't really understand. Are you saying one alleged rape means we should stop all immigration?

Edited by Nico: 27/2/2013 04:55:24 PM

Also what if that asyulum seeker was given a humantartian visa who was allowed in oz ?, do we send them back ? One fucked up thing that one idiot did doesn't mean everyone is a idiot . Hell my wife and her family were refugees . Do I send her back to bosna ?

So just because he's come from some dump it's OK to go sexually assaulting young women.

He should be deported.

So just because he's come from some dump it's OK to go sexually assaulting young women.

He should be deported.

So just because he's come from some dump it's OK to go sexually assaulting young women.

He should be deported.

The logic in this thread is fucking retarded.