|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Unshackled wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:You are very obsessed with Notor :lol:
-PB Perhaps you and him should get a room? You seem to "whiteknight" him (to use the forum vernacular the intellectual giants use here) every time I point out a Notor post. The wanker is banned but creates a multi(s) and slags off forum regulars and I'm the bad guy. If the mods did their job I wouldn't need to comment on this clown's posts. Quote:White knight term can also be applied to a person participating in online forum who is not tasked with moderating it, but engages in the activity nonetheless - so-called backseat modding. The underlying causes for the behaviour are the same - person is anthropomorphising the forum and sees it as a "maiden in distress" and charges to the rescue. Hasbara MRA Troll attributes 1. Supreme point of view 2. The Hasbara MRA troll knows best [size=6] 3. Condescending & Patronising[/size] 4. Socialist (Smart and ‘caring’) 5. Do not have to be Jewish a man but Pro-Israel anti feminist 6. Internet experts 7. Narcissistic 8. Provocative 9. Disruptive 10. Like to ask the questions, not answer questions 11. Control freaks 12. Inflamed by anyone being critical of Israel men 13. ‘Moral’ Guardians 14. Classic insults: Anti-semite, Neo- Nazi, White Supremacist, Holocaust denier Feminazi, mangina, femitards, manshaming, mansplaining 15. Adept with social networks well trained on IT Edited by MUNRUBENMUZ: 5/7/2015 12:43:20 PM
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Unshackled wrote:mcjules wrote:Yeah Unshackled is very obviously not Notor but also very obviously a multi which is against forum rules. Incorrect, I am not a multi. That would be hypocritical. I have principles. :lol: I don't accept technicalities such as: * My old account is banned * I don't use my old account any more * some other variation of this Couldn't care less if your new account is banned or not but I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone that doesn't recognise you as a multi. :-$ Say whatever you want. You're as transparent as pane of glass. You've given yourself away more than once and for someone who's supposedly a "noob" you don't seem to mind putting the boot into blokes that, wait for it, you've had ongoing wars with before. That and the use of particular insults unique to you that no one on here is retarded enough to use. And that's saying something. You're not fooling anyone. How's your 12 year old girl from Adelaide persona going? Haven't seen "her" post for a while.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Scientists have warned that marine life will be irreversibly changed unless CO2 emissions are drastically cut.
Writing in Science, experts say the oceans are heating, losing oxygen and becoming more acidic because of CO2.
They warn that the 2C maximum temperature rise for climate change agreed by governments will not prevent dramatic impacts on ocean systems.
And they say the range of options is dwindling as the cost of those options is skyrocketing.
Twenty-two world-leading marine scientists have collaborated in the synthesis report in a special section of Science journal. They say the oceans are at parlous risk from the combination of threats related to CO2.
They believe politicians trying to solve climate change have paid far too little attention to the impacts of climate change on the oceans.
It is clear, they say, that CO2 from burning fossil fuels is changing the chemistry of the seas faster than at any time since a cataclysmic natural event known as the Great Dying 250 million years ago.
They warn that the ocean has absorbed nearly 30% of the carbon dioxide we have produced since 1750 and, as CO2 is a mildly acidic gas, it is making seawater more acidic.
It has also buffered climate change by absorbing over 90% of the additional heat created by industrial society since 1970. The extra heat makes it harder for the ocean to hold oxygen.
'Radical change'
Several recent experiments suggest that many organisms can withstand the future warming that CO2 is expected to bring, or the decrease in pH, or lower oxygen… but not all at once.
Jean-Pierre Gattuso, lead author of the study, said: “The ocean has been minimally considered at previous climate negotiations. Our study provides compelling arguments for a radical change at the UN conference (in Paris) on climate change”. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33369024
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Unshackled wrote:mcjules wrote:Yeah Unshackled is very obviously not Notor but also very obviously a multi which is against forum rules. Incorrect, I am not a multi. That would be hypocritical. I have principles. :lol: I don't accept technicalities such as: * My old account is banned * I don't use my old account any more * some other variation of this Couldn't care less if your new account is banned or not but I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone that doesn't recognise you as a multi. :-$
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
Unshackled
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 241,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:You are very obsessed with Notor :lol:
-PB Perhaps you and him should get a room? You seem to "whiteknight" him (to use the forum vernacular the intellectual giants use here) every time I point out a Notor post. The wanker is banned but creates a multi(s) and slags off forum regulars and I'm the bad guy. If the mods did their job I wouldn't need to comment on this clown's posts. Quote:White knight term can also be applied to a person participating in online forum who is not tasked with moderating it, but engages in the activity nonetheless - so-called backseat modding. The underlying causes for the behaviour are the same - person is anthropomorphising the forum and sees it as a "maiden in distress" and charges to the rescue.
|
|
|
|
Unshackled
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 241,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Yeah Unshackled is very obviously not Notor but also very obviously a multi which is against forum rules. Incorrect, I am not a multi. That would be hypocritical. I have principles.
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah Unshackled is very obviously not Notor but also very obviously a multi which is against forum rules.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:You are very obsessed with Notor :lol:
-PB Perhaps you and him should get a room? You seem to "whiteknight" him (to use the forum vernacular the intellectual giants use here) every time I point out a Notor post. The wanker is banned but creates a multi(s) and slags off forum regulars and I'm the bad guy. If the mods did their job I wouldn't need to comment on this clown's posts. I don't need to whiteknight him because I know that isn't him :lol: -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:You are very obsessed with Notor :lol:
-PB So is Notor to be fair ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:You are very obsessed with Notor :lol:
-PB Perhaps you and him should get a room? You seem to "whiteknight" him (to use the forum vernacular the intellectual giants use here) every time I point out a Notor post. The wanker is banned but creates a multi(s) and slags off forum regulars and I'm the bad guy. If the mods did their job I wouldn't need to comment on this clown's posts.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
You are very obsessed with Notor :lol: -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Unshackled wrote:Perhaps joining Hasbara MRA is up your alley. It's a state funded bunch of saddos trolling network that is filled with employed and unemployed telemarketers, volunteer zealous members and other oxygen thieves pushing their propaganda and deception. Perhaps Notorganic can fill you in. https://whitewraithe.wordpress.com/a-guide-to-hasbara-trolls/ Hasbara MRA Troll attributes 1. Supreme point of view 2. The Hasbara MRA troll knows best 3. Condescending & Patronising 4. Socialist (Smart and ‘caring’) 5. Do not have to be Jewish a man but Pro-Israel anti feminist 6. Internet experts 7. Narcissistic 8. Provocative 9. Disruptive 10. Like to ask the questions, not answer questions 11. Control freaks 12. Inflamed by anyone being critical of Israel men 13. ‘Moral’ Guardians 14. Classic insults: Anti-semite, Neo- Nazi, White Supremacist, Holocaust denier Feminazi, mangina, femitards, manshaming, mansplaining 15. Adept with social networks well trained on IT Pretty much ticks all the boxes.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Unshackled wrote: Perhaps Draupnir can fill you in.
Given up trying to hide your multi then?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Unshackled wrote:What a disgraceful circle jerk this thread has turned into. No surprises really when differing opinions are 'eliminated'. The kicking the man that can no longer defend himself is a nice touch, bravo gentlemen. Murdoch rags, how convenient of you to grace us with your presence out of the blue :oops:  Seriously though, as far as we know Poptech isn't banned. Thanks for doing your bit to ensure ricey graces us with his presence again though.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
Unshackled
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 241,
Visits: 0
|
11.mvfc.11 wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote::lol: reputation smeared :lol: yeah ok mate. For all we know you're just some person being paid by someone to go on a football forum and troll . Fucks sake for someone who is apparently a uni graduate you have a lot of time to peruse this forum. Do you actually do work ? Or are you to preoccupied on this forum to do anything? ? Where do I sign up? Perhaps joining Hasbara is up your alley. It's a state funded trolling network that is filled with employed and volunteer zealous members pushing their propaganda and deception. Perhaps Draupnir can fill you in. https://whitewraithe.wordpress.com/a-guide-to-hasbara-trolls/ 
|
|
|
|
Unshackled
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 241,
Visits: 0
|
What a disgraceful circle jerk this thread has turned into. No surprises really when differing opinions are 'eliminated'. The kicking the man that can no longer defend himself is a nice touch, bravo gentlemen. Murdoch rags, how convenient of you to grace us with your presence out of the blue :oops:
|
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Global warming denial falls more into the realm of psychology. Read up on Dan Kahan's research into 'motivated reasoning' Or Stephanie Lewandowsky's research into the link between global warming denial & conspiracy ideation. http://www.shapingtomorrowsworld.org/bio.php?u=22Both of these professors have done HEAPS of research into why people deny global warming - it also correlates strongly with right wing voting.
|
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Good pick up! It can be tough for people to seek the truth when blogs on global warming denial like this proliferate the internet, filled with pseudoscience. Stick to the governmental authorities on the issue like IPCC, NASA, CSIRO, BOM, etc, etc Edited by Murdoch Rags Ltd: 4/7/2015 03:27:24 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:It's hilarious that "popped rice" regularly bans dissenting users on his forum under the guise of being trolls yet on here he blows up about silencing criticism via the same methods :lol: whats the saying ? Do as I say not what I do
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
It's hilarious that "popped rice" regularly bans dissenting users on his forum under the guise of being trolls yet on here he blows up about silencing criticism via the same methods :lol:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
"Impartial" :lol:
|
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
so with this logic, we can have global warming and only straight marriages 
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: do ricey is andrew k ? :lol: he has form too
He has been on numerous forums and everyone of them have barred him due to his incessant trolling
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Have a Google around for Poptech and the random postings in comment sections of many websites :lol: All the same shit rofl. EDIT: Keks -> https://ipka.wordpress.com/2010/10/21/denialist-populartechnology-net-denier-website/-PB Edited by paulbagzFC: 3/7/2015 09:31:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Andrew Rice Clay has a nice ring to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Awfully quiet on the PopTech front :lol:
-PB I'm still shocked that I was so spot on :lol: So farken embarrassing for Andrew Ricey.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Awfully quiet on the PopTech front :lol: -PB
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:mcjules wrote:benelsmore wrote:mcjules wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:I do note that big Energy companies seem to be looking at and investing research into renewables. They need to really. Even if you deny that burning fossil fuels for energy is doing anything, there is a limited supply. The World Coal Association reckons there's about 118 years of coal left at current levels of production. That sounds like a lot but energy demands are increasing as some very large third world countries are developing. Maybe this means that they'll be needed at large scale in 30 or 40 years rather than 10-ish (by current emissions targets) but it's still going to be needed. That's of course ignoring the impact on prices supply and demand will put on using coal for energy and there will be a natural rather than "artificial" tipping point where the renewables will become cheaper from an economic standpoint. This is why, apart from the climate impacts that are clear from the studies, the government should be doing all it can to help Australia innovate in this area as it will be a very lucrative industry to be a world leader in the not too distant future. Lets just burn rainforests for energy 8-[ Lucky the audience now has the intelligence to detect sarcasm ;) Wait? was that sarcastic too ?????????? :shock: :-s 8-[ Duh of course it wasn't....... ;)
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:benelsmore wrote:mcjules wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:I do note that big Energy companies seem to be looking at and investing research into renewables. They need to really. Even if you deny that burning fossil fuels for energy is doing anything, there is a limited supply. The World Coal Association reckons there's about 118 years of coal left at current levels of production. That sounds like a lot but energy demands are increasing as some very large third world countries are developing. Maybe this means that they'll be needed at large scale in 30 or 40 years rather than 10-ish (by current emissions targets) but it's still going to be needed. That's of course ignoring the impact on prices supply and demand will put on using coal for energy and there will be a natural rather than "artificial" tipping point where the renewables will become cheaper from an economic standpoint. This is why, apart from the climate impacts that are clear from the studies, the government should be doing all it can to help Australia innovate in this area as it will be a very lucrative industry to be a world leader in the not too distant future. Lets just burn rainforests for energy 8-[ Lucky the audience now has the intelligence to detect sarcasm ;) Wait? was that sarcastic too ?????????? :shock: :-s 8-[
|
|
|
|