this whole thing has an analog with the population scare of the 1950's to 1970's
they said we were overpopulated then and the world would end

and yet here we are with double the population and lifestyle has never been better

the same people are now trying again using climate change scare to curb population growth

blah blah blah out of context
the data says no warming in 15 years

they try to talk it down with words because they're in on the scam. you cannot ignore the data however, you just cannot ignore it

the work experience kid in middle of nowhere townsville who calls himself an IT manager is questioning my credentials
lol

What qualifications do you have?

-PB

I posted a paper from the MetOffice and you call that a dodgy article
pointless continuing, I'm certain I'm more qualified in the area of science than you are

...and please stop it with the 97 people thing. for starters that statistic is simply wrong to begin with and secondly consensus is not science.

thats exactly what you're doing
i've provided mountains of evidence in this thread. actual evidence, not media propaganda.

...you provided links to outdated papers which you didnt even read, have since been proven wrong and werent even relevant


Edited by ricecrackers: 12/7/2014 05:10:02 PM

you're completely fanatical about this issue
you'll construct any fantasy to fit with your doctrine on this

Climate Change officially proven false

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-12/brisbane-records-coldest-morning-103-years/5591890

Cold weather when it's expected to be cold doesn't mean there's no climate change. That's like putting your hand in the fridge and concluding that there's no climate change. It's cold when and where it's meant to be cold. "It's cold when it's meant to be cold. Where's your climate change now" is retarded logic.

Unseasonably warm weather when it's meant to be cold however is reason for concern.

But really, the be-all and end-all of this argument comes down to some pretty simple logic: Worst case scenario if climate change proponents are wrong and it isn't real is that humans start living a more environmentally friendly existence. We breathe cleaner air and live more sustainably with our rapidly growing population. If Climate change opponents are wrong, we destroy the planet and everyone faces the very real possibility of mass extinction. So which side do you want to be on?

And a whole bunch of two bit "envoironmentalists" each time the temperature goes over 30. "It's warm this May. Cloimate Change!!".

It's idiotic reasoning, which is why I'm pointing it out.

Not so much climate change but the costs associated with not changing what we rely on for energy:
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/6/24/policy-politics/abbotts-alan-jones-script-has-just-been-destroyed

Top quality deductive reasoning, commonly employed by intellectual heavyweights such as Barnaby Joyce.

The interesting thing about humans and "facts" is that we automatically seek out those "facts" that supplement our "beliefs". Also when we are shown "facts" that go against our "beliefs" this only goes to strengthen out "beliefs" further than if we were shown "facts" that support our "beliefs".

I kept hearing how "cloimate change" had created the really warm May that we had.

So do I assume if has nothing to do with me freezing my tits off today?

have you made provisions?

I was being serious, why would you think I would joke about that?

Someone as switched on as you would know that people are killing themselves because the fear of global warming is to much. I will become just another statistic.

so by your sarcasm i can assume that deep down you dont actually believe in it but cannot admit that much

Yes very much so, in fact I'm contemplating taking my own life because the fear is really getting to me.

serious question to the disciples of the global climate warming alarmist cult:

do you fear the devastating effects of global warming or not?

Lol.... This thread

i see stormfront has returned for some e-revenge

Yep :lol:

15 years is a pretty small time stamp. But the last 15 years have been the hot. 13 of the hottest 14 years on record have happened this century.

Is that not proof of warming or does each consecutive year have to be hotter to persuade you?

so the paper which states there has been no warming in 15 years is saying there is warming in the last 15 years?

please, just stop it with your rubbish

There's nothing 'lying' about pointing out that the link you provided disagrees with what you're claiming. In fact, there's nothing more truthful than disagreeing with your bullshit.

:-({|= just you afrodope

maybe if you stop blatantly lying :^o I might stop calling you out on it [-x
just a thought :idea: choice is yours :cool:

Anyone who disagrees with ricecrackers = lying.

Anyone who has a better understanding of the topic matter than ricecrackers (so everyone) = lying

Anyone who has a more sound argument with more supporting evidence than ricecrackers = lying

The world is full of liars and ricecrackers is the last vestige of truth.

you're lying again :^o

You provided a link to an article which actually contradicted what you were saying. The only thing you 'proved' is that you have no fucking idea what you're on about.