|
The Maco
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:Omg how have I missed the last few days of this thread :lol: The power of the crackers, he gets unbanned and everyone loses their minds :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Two birds with one stone. Imno the sharpshooter. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
A16Man
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Roar #1 wrote:Honestly I don't think he is trolling, he just genuinely believes what he is writing. But seriously, he disagrees with ever topic in every thread. Surely can't be legit.
|
|
|
|
|
milan_7
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:Omg how have I missed the last few days of this thread :lol: This :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
A16Man wrote:Roar #1 wrote:Honestly I don't think he is trolling, he just genuinely believes what he is writing. But seriously, he disagrees with ever topic in every thread. Surely can't be legit. I want to agree...but then I look at notor.
|
|
|
|
|
Roar #1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Roar #1 wrote:u4486662 wrote:ricecrackers has said much worse in the past. What he said about Zimbo was rather tame compared to some other stuff he's said.
Maybe it was a little of the "straw that broke the camel's back."
And, like what Notor said, he's clearly trolling. Are the moderator supposed to tolerate trolling? What are the form rules in this matter?
I'm being genuine as I don't know the answer to this. Honestly I don't think he is trolling, he just genuinely believes what he is writing. Yeah, but you're retarded. Ok
|
|
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Has RC been released?
|
|
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:Has RC been released? You're back?
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:humbert wrote:afromanGT wrote:humbert wrote:Person A professes support for Organisation A
Organisation A has a manifesto which actively calls for ethnic cleansing, genocide, and is nurtured in Nazi conspiracy theories.
Person B accuses Person A of wanting to commit murder.
Is this unreasonable? The difference is that you're drawing your own lines and conclusions here. That's upon you.On the other hand Ricecrackers flat out made the accusation that Zimbos was murderous and deranged. The difference is significant. Quote:Honestly I don't think he is trolling, he just genuinely believes what he is writing. Poe's Law. I think he's a genuine idiot. The only way that notorganic could state with such certainty that he's a troll is if he is in fact ricecrackers. It's not an unjustified one though, is it? Whether your insinuations are justified or not isn't the discussion at hand. You're making a point based around a series of details which you referenced. Ricecrackers made an accusation based around nothing more than him being muslim. That's not on. bottom feeding sack of compulsive lying lowlife scum would be too good for you. you're even worse than that. you're the reason I was banned you spineless snitch. you spread lies and personal attacks throughout the forum whenever you're routinely schooled on various topics you have NFI about you've lied again in this post
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:I have no doubt that RC is a malicious prick, but I'm aiming at the principle here. You either apply it to everyone, or to no one. I dont know why you have such an issue with me. there's no malice in my posts. I disagree with you on some things...(well they're not so much disagreements as they are situations where I have knowledge of something you dont) and agree with you on others I just put it down to naivety on your part, however you seem to be taking a principled stance here which is an admirable quality.
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:The moderation on this site leaves much to be desired. RC has been banned for a facetious comment, notwithstanding other comparable comments going unpunished.
Case in point; some commentators have accused me of supporting the killing of civilians, as well as being a racist, without proper cause.
Do they not deserve a ban? you see you were right the first time however I noticed you began to change your stance once the pack of dogs brought their peer pressure upon you
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Welcome back RC.
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:Welcome back RC. thanks mate
|
|
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:bottom feeding sack of compulsive lying lowlife scum would be too good for you. you're even worse than that.
you're the reason I was banned you spineless snitch. you spread lies and personal attacks throughout the forum whenever you're routinely schooled on various topics you have NFI about
you've lied again in this post
:lol: terrific first post back. It's good to see you've learned your lesson, won't break forum rules again, etc :lol:
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:bottom feeding sack of compulsive lying lowlife scum would be too good for you. you're even worse than that.
you're the reason I was banned you spineless snitch. you spread lies and personal attacks throughout the forum whenever you're routinely schooled on various topics you have NFI about
you've lied again in this post
:lol: terrific first post back. It's good to see you've learned your lesson, won't break forum rules again, etc :lol: which forum rules would that be? you wanna read some of the stuff that's been said to me here on a regular basis unsanctioned?
|
|
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:bottom feeding sack of compulsive lying lowlife scum would be too good for you. you're even worse than that.
you're the reason I was banned you spineless snitch. you spread lies and personal attacks throughout the forum whenever you're routinely schooled on various topics you have NFI about
you've lied again in this post
:lol: terrific first post back. It's good to see you've learned your lesson, won't break forum rules again, etc :lol: which forum rules would that be? you wanna read some of the stuff that's been said to me here on a regular basis unsanctioned? The rule of no personal attacks. How much of said stuff you want me to read were unprovoked, may I ask?
|
|
|
|
|
Roar #1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:bottom feeding sack of compulsive lying lowlife scum would be too good for you. you're even worse than that.
you're the reason I was banned you spineless snitch. you spread lies and personal attacks throughout the forum whenever you're routinely schooled on various topics you have NFI about
you've lied again in this post
:lol: terrific first post back. It's good to see you've learned your lesson, won't break forum rules again, etc :lol: w hich forum rules would that be?you wanna read some of the stuff that's been said to me here on a regular basis unsanctioned? The one about not being a twat
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:bottom feeding sack of compulsive lying lowlife scum would be too good for you. you're even worse than that.
you're the reason I was banned you spineless snitch. you spread lies and personal attacks throughout the forum whenever you're routinely schooled on various topics you have NFI about
you've lied again in this post
:lol: terrific first post back. It's good to see you've learned your lesson, won't break forum rules again, etc :lol: which forum rules would that be? you wanna read some of the stuff that's been said to me here on a regular basis unsanctioned? The rule of no personal attacks. How much of said stuff you want me to read were unprovoked, may I ask? afrodope conducts personal attacks against me regularly. in fact i'm in massive debt to him on this count. why is he allowed to get away with it whilst i'm banned for responding in type once?
|
|
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:bottom feeding sack of compulsive lying lowlife scum would be too good for you. you're even worse than that.
you're the reason I was banned you spineless snitch. you spread lies and personal attacks throughout the forum whenever you're routinely schooled on various topics you have NFI about
you've lied again in this post
:lol: terrific first post back. It's good to see you've learned your lesson, won't break forum rules again, etc :lol: which forum rules would that be? you wanna read some of the stuff that's been said to me here on a regular basis unsanctioned? The rule of no personal attacks. How much of said stuff you want me to read were unprovoked, may I ask? afrodope conducts personal attacks against me regularly. in fact i'm in massive debt to him on this count. why is he allowed to get away with it whilst i'm banned for responding in type once? Because most of the mods know afro personally and we'd have to deal with his whining about being banned daily, where as you we can just forget about until you come back.:lol:
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
he's not the only one either
in fact i've never made anything personal with anyone here who hasnt instigated it first
|
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Funky Munky wrote:Because most of the mods know afro personally and we'd have to deal with his whining about being banned daily, where as you we can just forget about until you come back.:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
it appears that what others say about me (some kind of legend they've created) defines what others who've had no dealings with me think about me
for the record I want to state I've:
1. never made a racist comment on this forum
2. never made a homophobic comment on this forum
3. never made an anti religious comment on this forum or personally attacked someone for their religion
but...
i've been on the receiving end of all 3
|
|
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
#justiceforricey
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
aufc_ole wrote:#justiceforricey #cutforricey -PB
|
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:bottom feeding sack of compulsive lying lowlife scum would be too good for you. you're even worse than that.
you're the reason I was banned you spineless snitch. you spread lies and personal attacks throughout the forum whenever you're routinely schooled on various topics you have NFI about
you've lied again in this post
:lol: terrific first post back. It's good to see you've learned your lesson, won't break forum rules again, etc :lol: which forum rules would that be? you wanna read some of the stuff that's been said to me here on a regular basis unsanctioned? The rule of no personal attacks. How much of said stuff you want me to read were unprovoked, may I ask? afrodope conducts personal attacks against me regularly. in fact i'm in massive debt to him on this count. why is he allowed to get away with it whilst i'm banned for responding in type once? If you're going to complain about personal attacks, probably don't launch one yourself while you're doing it. ricecrackers wrote:1. never made a racist comment on this forum
2. never made a homophobic comment on this forum
3. never made an anti religious comment on this forum or personally attacked someone for their religion That's clearly both 1 and 3 covered in one fell swoop.
|
|
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Rubbish. Comment had nothing to do with Z's race or religion, and everything to do with his professed support for Hamas.
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:pv4 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:bottom feeding sack of compulsive lying lowlife scum would be too good for you. you're even worse than that.
you're the reason I was banned you spineless snitch. you spread lies and personal attacks throughout the forum whenever you're routinely schooled on various topics you have NFI about
you've lied again in this post
:lol: terrific first post back. It's good to see you've learned your lesson, won't break forum rules again, etc :lol: which forum rules would that be? you wanna read some of the stuff that's been said to me here on a regular basis unsanctioned? The rule of no personal attacks. How much of said stuff you want me to read were unprovoked, may I ask? afrodope conducts personal attacks against me regularly. in fact i'm in massive debt to him on this count. why is he allowed to get away with it whilst i'm banned for responding in type once? If you're going to complain about personal attacks, probably don't launch one yourself while you're doing it. ricecrackers wrote:1. never made a racist comment on this forum
2. never made a homophobic comment on this forum
3. never made an anti religious comment on this forum or personally attacked someone for their religion That's clearly both 1 and 3 covered in one fell swoop. more lies its nothing to do with religion or race
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
you do realise afro, that by making those assumptions actually exposes you as the racist here
well thats case closed then. I cant say I'm surprised.
and your insults based on religion, particularly toward christians and jews are well documented. you dont even try to deny that.
|
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Referring back to OP.
It's kind of nice to see Afro having a bad time.
|
|
|
|