|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? That's all there is to it. The intent was there to prevent the goal. Whether it was going in or otherwise the intent was clear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:benelsmore wrote:Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? That's all there is to it. The intent was there to prevent the goal. Whether it was going in or otherwise the intent was clear. You post this even after the rule was posted above :lol: :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:benelsmore wrote:Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? That's all there is to it. The intent was there to prevent the goal. Whether it was going in or otherwise the intent was clear. IKR. It's all well and good to say it was gong wide which it was. The Ox didn't know that and was intentionally trying to stop it. Gooners :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
jlm8695 wrote:benelsmore wrote:Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? I'm sorry, it's going wide so it's not a red card, quite simple. Whether Ox knows or not is completely and utterly irrelevant.  This. Red will be rescinded. Can't say I agree with the rule tbh but by the law it's not red.
|
|
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
5-0. Shocker.
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:afromanGT wrote:[quote=benelsmore]Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? That's all there is to it. The intent was there to prevent the goal. Whether it was going in or otherwise the intent was clear. IKR. It's all well and good to say it was gong wide which it was. The Ox didn't know that and was intentionally trying to stop it. Gooners :lol: [/quote Read the fucking rules ffs. What part of "The punishment arises not from the act of the player deliberatelyhandling the bal;l but from the unfair and unacceptable and unfair intervention that prevented a goal from being scored" dont you understand?
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
imnofreak wrote:jlm8695 wrote:benelsmore wrote:Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? I'm sorry, it's going wide so it's not a red card, quite simple. Whether Ox knows or not is completely and utterly irrelevant. This. Red will be rescinded. Can't say I agree with the rule tbh but by the law it's not red. I disagree with the rule also. Just saying I have no sympathy for the Ox being sent off for what he did. Unlawful or otherwise. What a stupid thing to do.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
missed that goal . Wtf oh well here comes piers Morgan :LOL:
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
jlm8695 wrote:benelsmore wrote:afromanGT wrote:[quote=benelsmore]Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? That's all there is to it. The intent was there to prevent the goal. Whether it was going in or otherwise the intent was clear. IKR. It's all well and good to say it was gong wide which it was. The Ox didn't know that and was intentionally trying to stop it. Gooners :lol: [/quote Read the fucking rules ffs. What part of "The punishment arises not from the act of the player deliberatelyhandling the bal;l but from the unfair and unacceptable and unfair intervention that prevented a goal from being scored" dont you understand? I know the rules but I have no sympathy. Stop having a bitch princess.
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
imnofreak wrote:jlm8695 wrote:benelsmore wrote:Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? I'm sorry, it's going wide so it's not a red card, quite simple. Whether Ox knows or not is completely and utterly irrelevant. This. Red will be rescinded. Can't say I agree with the rule tbh but by the law it's not red. Fucking thank you, it literally couldn't be any more clearer, yet people like to make up their own definitions and ignore facts.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
Really is unbelievable stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
jlm8695 wrote:imnofreak wrote:jlm8695 wrote:benelsmore wrote:Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? I'm sorry, it's going wide so it's not a red card, quite simple. Whether Ox knows or not is completely and utterly irrelevant. This. Red will be rescinded. Can't say I agree with the rule tbh but by the law it's not red. Fucking thank you, it literally couldn't be any more clearer, yet people like to make up their own definitions and ignore facts. You've been so hard done by :lol:
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:jlm8695 wrote:benelsmore wrote:afromanGT wrote:[quote=benelsmore]Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? That's all there is to it. The intent was there to prevent the goal. Whether it was going in or otherwise the intent was clear. IKR. It's all well and good to say it was gong wide which it was. The Ox didn't know that and was intentionally trying to stop it. Gooners :lol: [/quote Read the fucking rules ffs. What part of "The punishment arises not from the act of the player deliberatelyhandling the bal;l but from the unfair and unacceptable and unfair intervention that prevented a goal from being scored" dont you understand? I know the rules but I have no sympathy. Stop having a bitch princess. You don't know the rules considering you're blatantly wrong, but nice try anyway buddy!
|
|
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
6-0. My word.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Perfect run, great 1:1 finish. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
Not good for us because I didn't want their GD to go up so much. My word.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Whohoo we Suck on the upside . Facebook is about to explode :lol:
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
If we dont win the FA Cup...........
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
jlm8695 wrote:benelsmore wrote:jlm8695 wrote:benelsmore wrote:afromanGT wrote:[quote=benelsmore]Can't see any problems with it. Intentionally handling the ball in the box trying to stop a goal. How was the Ox (Gibbs) to know it was just going wide? That's all there is to it. The intent was there to prevent the goal. Whether it was going in or otherwise the intent was clear. IKR. It's all well and good to say it was gong wide which it was. The Ox didn't know that and was intentionally trying to stop it. Gooners :lol: [/quote Read the fucking rules ffs. What part of "The punishment arises not from the act of the player deliberatelyhandling the bal;l but from the unfair and unacceptable and unfair intervention that prevented a goal from being scored" dont you understand? I know the rules but I have no sympathy. Stop having a bitch princess. You don't know the rules considering you're blatantly wrong, but nice try anyway buddy! You posted the rules. He should not have been sent off. I disagree with the rules like Imno does. IMO it's about intent, whether it's going wide or not. The red card should be rescinded based on rules will be. Can you stop being a bitch now?
|
|
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
jlm8695 wrote:If we dont win the FA Cup........... We won't
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
I wish there was no red card for that incident. Now it's a scapegoat for horrible tactics.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:jlm8695 wrote:If we dont win the FA Cup........... We won't :lol: Yep and then the Internet will explode
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:jlm8695 wrote:If we dont win the FA Cup........... We won't I'll be well and truly getting my Ken on if this happens.
|
|
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:jlm8695 wrote:If we dont win the FA Cup........... We won't You will.
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:I wish there was no red card for that incident. Now it's a scapegoat for horrible tactics. >Ignores all posts from Arsenal fans slamming tactics before red card was even brought up.
|
|
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:I wish there was no red card for that incident. Now it's a scapegoat for horrible tactics. It wont be. The game was long gone even before/without that.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
We won't we'll choke once again and the papers can have their yearly wenger needs to spend and get sacked pages again .You know it's bound to happen
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
C'mon 7-1.
|
|
|
|