The talking points after the game from a media perspective will be about the incident.

You can always forgive the desire of players playing a man down when there was no desire from the start. Fox commentators blaming the schedule.

The intent was to prevent the goal. That was the sole purpose for his actions.

Your whole "it was going wide" argument is ridiculous. If a player is brought down by the last man as he shoots, whether the ball is going wide doesn't matter, it's still a red card. And this is the same.

AOC intentionally handled the ball in an attempt to prevent a goal being scored. Red card. Early shower. Game over. End of discussion.

The worst part of this is the fact it happened before. How the fuck we didn't learn from Anfield I'll never know.

...

I accordance with the rules you're apparently wrong.

In accordance with common sense (which is contrary to Gooner logic) I completely agree with you.

You have to slam Wenger for this. As in the Arsenal thread, red card aside Arsenal were well beaten before the incident.

A suicidal high line against Chelsea?

The intent doesn't matter, as per the rules but keep making up your own definitions :lol:

These cunts deserve all the abuse they're going to get over the next few days.

Do you agree with the rules out of curiosity?

Nope, doesn't change them though.

Football statistician Duncan Alexander: 50% of the Premier League goals Arsenal have conceded this season have come in three away games.

Yikes

Seems a bit rich that you're having a crack at us over a fine margin like a coat of paint on the post.

One of the worst defeats I've seen in a while of a top tier side, contenders once, just lucky your still enjoying a gap to your pinnacle season game of last weekend at least you got that one ;)
If you get the FA Cup good luck to youse but I don't think the players have the heart.

It's hardly rich, you seem to think making up your own definitions of what should be red justifies it, irrespective of clear rules.

+ We're 6-0 down FFS, telling you you're wrong is a handy distraction.

Tottenham winger Andros Townsend: Who thinks we will see another selfie from Wojciech Szczesny after today's game?


:lol:

:lol: that's what I thought.

:lol: <3

your mean imno but it is




:lol:

Yes it does.

.......... and Jose's done.

Edited by benelsmore: 23/3/2014 01:35:20 AM

Is that the biggest win in the premier league this season?

Jesus christ. He means that the intent alone doesn't mean it should be a red.

This is an excerpt from the actual FA rules:



Please read this. I think it's a stupid rule but BY THE LAW the red was incorrect. There wasn't a lot in it, it was narrowly wide, hard to see, etc, whatever else you want to add as an excuse. But by the law. It. Is. NOT. A. Red.

Now can we shutup about this stupid fucking argument and just laugh at Arsenal!? :lol:

Chesney for TOTY?????

QUIZ *Who Am I?*

My team wins the game 6-0 against 10 men.
I played 80 min as the lone striker.
I did not even get a shot on target.

...

City beat Norwich 7-0.

The ball was moving towards the goals. Saying "it was going wide" is just gunners fans clutching at straws.

Sorry, where did you get 'moving towards the goals' as being relevant?

The rule says 'preventing a goal from being scored'. Did the handball do that? No.

Edited by imnofreak: 23/3/2014 01:50:06 AM

Liverpool and Tottenham fan admit by the rules it's not a red card.

>"Gunners fans clutching at straws"
#AfroLogic

Edited by jlm8695: 23/3/2014 01:51:49 AM

Guys guys , stop your bickering and just laugh at us once again . We don't show up for the big games . We didn't show fight or try to win for wenger .

Stella start by Cardiff!

-PB

Fucks sake Allen. Wake up.