Who is this afrodope that ricecrackers keeps posting about? I searched through the members registry and can't find any mention of a user with that name.

It's you, fuckwad.

I just wanted to know how Ryan Davis died while he was working on Giant Bomb.

Edited by notorganic: 28/8/2014 08:39:07 PM

If the government is watching you searching for potentially inflammatory terms on google under an innocent premise then odds are they're going to see you searching for that innocent premise too. If you're consistently searching for IRA sites and aren't logging into the MU student portal and responding to your Political Sciences lecturer you're going to draw attention. But most people don't search for that kind of stuff without having a conspicuous trend or motive.

rubbish
some people are just actually interested in history.

No doubt. And that's going to show across a prolonged internet history. If you're visiting sites about converting to islam or western motivated terrorism you're probably going to raise some alarm bells, but otherwise there's not really anything to worry about is there?

so converting to islam is an indicator of a terrorist threat now is it?
wow your bigotry is neverending

Soooo back on topic.

Has there been anything more as to where the parents were during all this?

-PB

Firstly, I'm American and it's completly unconstitutional.

Secondly the method which they use is completly flawed to begin with. They collect so much data that they can't even be effective in a present way. They are pretty much the worlds worst hoarders

FFS Eliot Rodger was well known to be mentally I'll, wrote up a whole manifesto and released youtube videos describing his 'retribution'. And the NSA couldn't. Even catch this guy before he killed 6 innocent people.

They couldn't catch the boston bombers before the act despite their presence online and with radicals in Chechnya. What the fuck is this for and what the fuck are we paying for anyway?

Ironically they also couldn't catch Edward snowden (but then again he might know how to get around it, or just know how shit it is at what it's supposed to do)

It's really good at doing one thing, looking into the history of one person, they don't even need a warrant to do that and they wanted to keep it a secret. I'm not saying me, I'm not important to the gov at this current moment. I could be one day if I had information they don't want me to have or show the country.

Well not in isolation, but a combination of sites could be alarming

And if not long after looking at said sites books a flight to Syria, then that would be worrying and he hopefully would be put under more scrutiny

Stuffing their fat faces.

But wouldn't the fact that they didn't stop the attacks prove that their intelligence gathering isn't as extension as people are saying?

Or the Government knew about it and let it happen because a bit of fear is good.

" Bullets and Burgers"

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

merica

No, it proves they collect too much and because of that they are useless at preventing imminent attacks.

But how do you know that?

I agree with the sentiment but not the examples. Smoking in public places and wearing a helmet on a bike are obvious and necessary laws.

Denmark disagrees.

Well I gave 2 anecdotal cases were if the NSA was more pinpoint in their targeting should've been able to catch. But it's also well documented it's overall pretty useless



http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/1/13/review-finds-nsametadatacollectionhasntstoppedanattack.html

exactly

makes you wonder if they're really interested in preventing terrorism at all and more interested in overreach for political or monetary gain...or just plain power tripping

Well then its just a bad execution of a good idea.

amazing how many people were against the PATRIOT act when Bush was in power and now its Obama its all cool

Requiring a helmet just discourages bike riding. All these blue bikes in the city (melbourne) are pretty much useless unless for what they are designed for unless casually carry a helmet around with them.

Lots of European countries don't require helmets and their accident rates are lower than here, are dropping and ours are rising. Maybe if we had more cyclists on the road cars would be more aware.

Why is banning smoking in public places an obvious law? Second hand smoke doesn't really affect people unless you are in a confined space, and I'm for banning it in cars with children.

I don't wanna smell that shit, They can go kill themselves somewhere else :cool:

Yes agree. The internet should not be censored.

It's like you're trying to prove my initial point that Australians love the nanny state.

Meanwhile the only bit of evidence you provided that Americans are dumb and brainwashed is there are Obama posters everywhere (which there aren't) and that jersey shore exists.

That's "islam or western motivated terrorism" not "islam, or western motivated terrorism".

Wow. Your illiteracy is never-ending.

That's why some 60 attacks on US soil have been thwarted since 9/11.

I didnt write that :lol:

But who did? :-k

Not because of the nsa's data collecting though

And there is a big Obama portrait hanging at LAX

comma or no comma, it doesn't make a difference
you used an 'or'

its quite obvious what you meant