Good call.

Lol Get tae fuck pal, I know exactly what it's like. I've been mugged twice overseas and had my apartment in Thailand totally cleared out about 10 years ago which is more of a nightmare than if it happened here. Sure it's a cunt to deal with but considering you get everything back if you aren't a stingy cunt on your insurance it's better than murdering someone, and then later having to prove your innocence in court, because they wanted your telly.

Don't know where I stand on this to be honest. If I felt my life and my family's lives were at risk, I'd think I'd shoot... But all reasoning goes out the door when you're as fucked up as that guy was.

Who needs to move to 'Merica. Fuck yeah!

433 is a fuckwit

Exactly, why even have a justice system if we're going to let people being the judge and jury and shoot people on sight?

Edited by mcjules: 17/10/2014 09:50:57 AM

They aren't being rednecks I can assure you.

This is just some faux-outrage trying to justify muh rights in an American way.

Nowhere in the world would this not be considered manslaughter.

Look at Oscar Pistorius ffs.

-PB

Shoot someone in the head and kill them, you have to deal with the consequences.

-PB

I'm surprised he even noticed them or even cared they were there :d he must be a good shot too.

But yeah, its a sad world we live in when you go to gaol for defending yourself but on the other hand they could have been Mormon's (remember the bikie's turning up at Jesse Pinkman's door in Breaking bad#-o )

For the record, I am anti Gun, I hear gun owners say all the time, "Gun's don't kill people, people kill people". Here is the irony , that's exactly why we don't want people to have guns ](*,)

Edited by StiflersMom: 17/10/2014 07:50:54 AM

poor 433 needs to move to america. In some states they have laws where it is basically legal to kill someone as long as you shout before hand "he's coming right for us"

lol at the rednecks on here.

Yep

Pearler of a shot. Probably would have done the same thing if I'm tbh. Free human target practice.

The only important thing: If the burglar didn't have the intention of committing a crime he'd still be alive.

Everything else is irrelevant imo. If he wasn't a criminal piece of shit he'd not have ruined the life of the person who shot him.

This country's going to the dogs....

Worst fucking post ever you've clearly never been robbed.

No but firing a weapon under influence of alcohol and drugs is.
If he was sober then he may have got off since he would have been in a better frame of mind to make a judgement but (excuse the pun) he shot himself in the foot by shooting someone under the influence in the first place.

Wasn't even in self defence anyway; he had the drop on the burglar from his window, he never saw it coming.

For killing someone, not for being high and drunk

Which law is that lol?

George Zimmerman is aussie now??

George Zimmerman disapproves of this.

Tbf, if he was driving a car and he ran over them it'd be no different.

Just because your pissed/stoned doesn't excuse you for using your gun.

Self defense is not a valid reason for discharging a gun in this country.

-PB

433 I think you should realise the guy was high and drunk . No matter the reasoning , guy shouldn't be applauded .

Pretty light night really.

He was probably cutting down.

This is strange - I completely agree with you. . :lol:



Did you completely ignore my post? Or just choose to not read it?


This man didn't instigate the crime - the robber did.


Do you want to be part of that "extremely low" %?

Says the bloke with terrorist organisation propaganda splattered over his sig.

Ha ha. This thread is not quite panning out as 433 had hoped.

42 stubbies and 35 bongs, Really?

Generally if someone is going to invade my house, they are more likely after something like my TV or something material item that I really am not going to care much about (It will all be insured anyway). I'd rather they just take that and leave, then escalate potentially escalate a conflict beyond my control and further endanger my family. If someone actually attacks me or my family with intent to cause grievous bodily harm then i'd have no hesitation in killing in self defence but going out to kill them first is just a sick mindset. Proper home security like deadlocks, secure windows and alarm systems is going to do more to deter potential robbers away from targeting my house than the chance that I might fight back ffs. The reality is though that break ins are low in both the parts of Melbourne and Brisbane where i live and Australia is not the United States. The chance of you getting your house broken into by armed criminals is nowhere near as high, so being utterly paranoid about needing to protect your house is stupid. Your thirst for blood and murder weapons is quite disturbing tbh.

Edited by melbourne_terrace: 16/10/2014 10:15:11 PM