Kevin Airs
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
This is all going very black fedora so locked.
Seriously, if you think white straight men have a hard time in modern society, you are doing life wrong.
Go away, this forum does not need you.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
scott21 wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:From your first line I take it we can learn nothing from a country like Sweden? Given that, according to the article you linked, "Sweden is the world’s fourth most gender-equal country, as measured in the World Economic Forum’s latest gender gap report" would that not seem to say they may, perhaps be doing something right? I'm not saying the gender neutral pronoun is the go but obviously, in other ways, they are way ahead of us. You can learn equality. That doesn't have to be via extreme feminism. It's worth pointing out that the GII Manrub is referring to measures equality of outcome, NOT equality of opportunity, and so is not a report on "equality" at all. It also does not focus on issues of equality which are of benefit to women, making it completely out of balance with reality. I've also seen him use the words "positive discrimination" in the past few days, which tells me just about everything I need to know of his views on equality.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:From your first line I take it we can learn nothing from a country like Sweden? Given that, according to the article you linked, "Sweden is the world’s fourth most gender-equal country, as measured in the World Economic Forum’s latest gender gap report" would that not seem to say they may, perhaps be doing something right? I'm not saying the gender neutral pronoun is the go but obviously, in other ways, they are way ahead of us. You can learn equality. That doesn't have to be via extreme feminism.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Sounds like an interesting book. This bit is interesting from the interview linked. Goes some way to explaining the threat some blokes feel when gender equality is discussed. ---------------------------------------------------//------------------------------------------------- Why are people so intent on misrepresenting the differences between the male and female brain? We look around in our society, and we want to explain whatever state of sex inequality we have. It’s more comfortable to attribute it to some internal difference between men and women than the idea that there must be something very unjust about our society. As long as there has been brain science there have been misguided explanations and justification for sex and inequality — that women’s skulls are the wrong shape, that their brain is too small, that their head is too unspecialized.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
From your first line I take it we can learn nothing from a country like Sweden? Given that, according to the article you linked, "Sweden is the world’s fourth most gender-equal country, as measured in the World Economic Forum’s latest gender gap report" would that not seem to say they may, perhaps be doing something right? I'm not saying the gender neutral pronoun is the go but obviously, in other ways, they are way ahead of us.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Bullion
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
You don't want to go down the feminist road. Here is Sweden feminists are trying to ban teachers to using the words him (Han) or her (Hon) at kindergarden. They want to use a word "Hen". Which is gender neutral. A word that added to the dictionary this year. http://www.newsweek.com/2014/10/03/three-letter-word-driving-gender-revolution-272654.html
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Personally, I think girls gets praised a lot more for being clever or smart (as well as being pretty).
There are more girls in tertiary education than boys. We all know girls are doing better at school.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:We have political parties making platforms and policy based on debunked statistics and hypotheses (just look at wage gap and domestic violence discussion), you can't say that modern feminism is ineffectual. This. E-feminism is fucking crazy. -PB
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
We have political parties making platforms and policy based on debunked statistics and hypotheses (just look at wage gap and domestic violence discussion), you can't say that modern feminism is ineffectual.
|
|
|
damonzzzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 155,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:Most of the time little girls are praised for "being pretty". (Not smart or clever or brave like little boys.)
Subsequently, over many years, they work out that being "pretty" means they get praised more often and consciously and subconsciously they start to believe that being pretty is important and a measure of their worth. (More so than being a good person, being smart, having a caring personality etc etc.)
This constant "aren't you beautiful", "isn't she pretty", "what a little princess" reinforcing of this vacuous notion of beauty being a positive personality trait means that the poor things grow up thinking that beauty and looks are the only important and worthwhile thing in their lives. I completely agree with you. I believe that this contributes to what I have previously described as absolving women and girls of any personal responsibility and is a contributing factor in why t hird wave feminism (ie: The Tumblr Generation) is so out of control and closed itself off to any kind of disagreement. You definitely overstate feminism in its current form though. By large it is just a bunch of ugly, salty women who have no real power to change anything shouting as loud as they can. While the opposition is mainly fedora tipping neckbeards who live on reddit. They say annoying, stupid shit but once you stop paying attention to it you don't really come across it anymore. Those two can fight it out and the rest of us can get on with our lives.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:Most of the time little girls are praised for "being pretty". (Not smart or clever or brave like little boys.)
Subsequently, over many years, they work out that being "pretty" means they get praised more often and consciously and subconsciously they start to believe that being pretty is important and a measure of their worth. (More so than being a good person, being smart, having a caring personality etc etc.)
This constant "aren't you beautiful", "isn't she pretty", "what a little princess" reinforcing of this vacuous notion of beauty being a positive personality trait means that the poor things grow up thinking that beauty and looks are the only important and worthwhile thing in their lives. I completely agree with you. I believe that this contributes to what I have previously described as absolving women and girls of any personal responsibility and is a contributing factor in why third wave feminism (ie: The Tumblr Generation) is so out of control and closed itself off to any kind of disagreement.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Which social norms allow domestic violence?? Other than the social norms where it's quite funny to see a bloke getting slapped around by his megacunt of a misses, of course.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Brilliant posts Inala. I'll go one step further. Most of the time little girls are praised for "being pretty". (Not smart or clever or brave like little boys.) Subsequently, over many years, they work out that being "pretty" means they get praised more often and consciously and subconsciously they start to believe that being pretty is important and a measure of their worth. (More so than being a good person, being smart, having a caring personality etc etc.) This constant "aren't you beautiful", "isn't she pretty", "what a little princess" reinforcing of this vacuous notion of beauty being a positive personality trait means that the poor things grow up thinking that beauty and looks are the only important and worthwhile thing in their lives. It's no wonder girls grow up with self esteem issues. Pay careful attention to how parents and people introduced to little girls interact with them over the next few weeks. It stands out like dogs balls when you start to become aware of it. It would be very rare to hear "aren't you clever" come out of the mouth of any adult with respect to a little girl. Yes the parents can and should praise them in other ways than just their beauty or looks but the parents are fighting 100's of other people that that child is interacting with on a daily basis and their preconceived ideas on what and how little girls should be and act like. You can only hope that one day screaming headlines won't dominate the news story and someone will perhaps think to themselves "I wonder if there's something in that" and give the idea behind the headline pause for thought.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Bundoora B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
so tony abbot sez today something like 'let girls be girls and boys be boys'. innocuous enough right? the problem is that by buying girls toys for girls you are not letting them be themselves. you are telling them 'this is what girls do, so this is what you will do.' same for boys. the vast majority of men do not realise the way the gender stereotyping has created a deficit in their lives. unfortunately, women get the worse end of the deal. if men had it that bad something would have been done about it long ago. but no, some women will bring the issue up and it will get shut down by the white male hegemonic suitcase brigade. 
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
inala brah wrote:mcjules wrote:RedshirtWilly wrote:Waiting for the Greens to back a study that looks into the links between domestic violence and whether you were born. Exactly. Personally I think the issue of gender stereotypes in toys (and marketing and media in general) is serious enough to promote some awareness but linking it to such extreme things as domestic violence means that people will inevitably write it off as a "crazy greens" thing. except the research has been done and gender stereotyping has a great influence in the social norms which allow domestic violence. so the only crazy thing here are the conservative nut jobs who refuse to acknowledge the research and act. People don't see the connection as they seem to be a million miles away. My point was more that the message which I think is a good one around toys and their reinforcing of outdated gender roles gets ignored and the focus on the fact that it may lead to domestic violence gets all the headlines. Along the lines of my previous post:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Bundoora B
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:RedshirtWilly wrote:Waiting for the Greens to back a study that looks into the links between domestic violence and whether you were born. Exactly. Personally I think the issue of gender stereotypes in toys (and marketing and media in general) is serious enough to promote some awareness but linking it to such extreme things as domestic violence means that people will inevitably write it off as a "crazy greens" thing. except the research has been done and gender stereotyping has a great influence in the social norms which allow domestic violence. so the only crazy thing here are the conservative nut jobs who refuse to acknowledge the research and act.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Here are a few questions: If you wander into any toy store, you'll see: 1. "Girls'" toy isles full of pink things, fairies, baby dolls, play kitchens, vacuum cleaners and other household appliances 2. "Boys'" toy isles full of trucks & cars, action figures, play tools like hammers, screwdrivers etc Why should any of the things in item 1 be classified as exclusively as "girls" toys? Do you as an adult male and a dad (or your partner if you're female) not look after babies, cook in the kitchen, do household chores? Like wise for item 2. Do your partners ever do handy work around the house or drive a car? Toy shops to me are like a step back into the 1950s. I don't accept "they're just fucking toys" as an argument. My daughter likes to play with her toy kitchen because that's what her parents do and it's fun for her to pretend. She's also learning in the process. Likewise she loves coming out in the garden with me and "helping" or just sitting next to me while I repair things. Still it annoys me that the greens have tried to link it to domestic violence. Toys are a reflection of their marketing which is a reflection on society as a whole "fixing toys" is not going to fix the problem. These stereotypes bombard us everywhere as notor showed with his youtube clips (except they happen both ways). Edited by mcjules: 2/12/2014 11:27:06 PM
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
damonzzzz wrote:Damonzz mum popping up again after hearing this story on the news
'what a load of shit, why is this even news they are just fucking toys.'
:lol: :lol: :lol: My Mum is a bit the same, although she does also takes really strange moral stances on other things.
|
|
|
damonzzzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 155,
Visits: 0
|
Damonzz mum popping up again after hearing this story on the news
'what a load of shit, why is this even news they are just fucking toys.'
:lol: :lol:
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Sweet, I have underlings!
Debates like these are always going to be stymied by people who are emotionally sensitive to the content within.
Perhaps sticking to talking about facts rather than presenting more strawmen about whose mothers loved who and trying to guess motivations would result in a more civil discussion... but that's just me.
Edited by notorganic: 2/12/2014 08:24:58 PM
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:The Maco wrote:This is so unnecessary :lol: Parents will buy their kids what they want, at the very least what they think they want Having worked at target for 2 years, come Christmas time people will ask you what's been popular for boys and for girls, and for age groups They will but by conforming to stereotypes the parents help reinforce stereotypes. Note, and this is important, that I am not saying little Jenny should get a Tonka truck or Mikey gets a Barbie doll. All I am saying is that who's to say that a little girl might have interests outside of what's in the girls aisle at Target or Kmart. If they're never exposed to any other interests then they may be missing out on opportunities later in life because those interests weren't ever encouraged or nurtured. Totally agree with what youre saying. Its not misandry, its just trying to create a more fostering environment whereby a little child doesnt feel shunned for wanting a toy that isnt stereotypically related to their gender. Dont think many would have even been given the choice when all theyve been told is little boys play with trucks and little girls play with Barbies. Sure a lot of boys would still go for a truck for example but thats not what this is aimed at targetting. Usual suspects on this forum getting way to insecure about anything to do with gender equality though. Absolutely correct about the "usual suspects". It is simply not possible to have a discussion on any subject without the usual boofheads coming in a linking a few odd examples here and there that do, in fact, show the reverse to be true also. Unfortunately (coveniently?) they never mention that for every example they provide they are outnumbered 100 fold the other way. I can only imagine that either they weren't loved by their mothers during their childhood or that some sheila really did a number on them at some stage such is the massive chip they have on their shoulders. It's gotten to the point that if someone linked an article that said women have got the best vaginas Notor or one of his underlings would be jumping in saying "it's simply not true, men have great vaginas too" or some other rubbish.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:u4486662 wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:u4486662 wrote:This has to be the stupidest shit ever. Anyone who thinks they can control the instincts and desires of their children simply does not have children. Generally, they will naturally gravitate towards toys stereotypical to their gender if both groups of toys are placed in front of them.
I know you are an educated man so I'm not saying this to be a smartarse because you are one of the few on here that I would consider a deep thinker but are you saying it's 100% nature, 0% nurture? Is there absolutely no wiggle room to guide them towards other interests? Nothing is 100% nature OR nurture. My thoughts are that people underestimate the natural instincts of children and the ways in which they behave. It can, for example, often been seen how two children can be parented the same way, by the same parents but because they are brothers (and have slightly different genes) they have different personalities and interests. I think in general people over-estimate the role of the environment in their children's outcomes later in life. This is however not to say that significant trauma early in life (usually within the first two years) can't have a detrimental effect on children. It definitely can and does but it doesn't change their interests, rather it changes the way they respond to situations, in that they usually have an inability to rationalise stress in their lives. This story is however trying to create a link between the toys children play with and domestic violence. Domestic violence is a serious issue but it is not related to gender roles displayed by children. It was a very clunky analogy by the Greens no doubt. Do you not think though that a male child brought up in a household where he is told that a woman's opinion has no worth, that girls shouldn't be working in specific roles, that "she deserved it", that women aren't as smart as men, where women are only seem as a plaything for a man that that child wouldn't grow up with a skewed outlook of life? Yes. If a child was raised to think either gender were lesser in every role then not only would that cause problems for the child when they reach adulthood, it would also, I believe, classify as child abuse. Your hammer has hit the nail closer to the head, much closer than to say that its caused by boys not playing with barbies and girls not playing with trucks.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
I think I need to incorporate "usual suspect" into my sig somehow
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Thankfully, not all feminists are so retarded.
[youtube]3TR_YuDFIFI[/youtube]
|
|
|
Les Gock
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 681,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Another instance of Green misandry this week was the development of a bill to legislate an increase in superannuation for women to combat the "wage gap". Wage Gap, of course, is that buzz word to deflect away from the fact that women often choose to leave the workforce and become primary caregivers of children, thus bringing the average wage of all aggregate women down compared to men who largely support their partners choices by working full-time+ and earning enough money to feed a family. The wage gap myth has been well and truly debunked as absurd. If there really was a wage gap, every business or company would hire women instead of men. Unfortunately, simple logic isn't exactly a strong suit of modern feminists. Or Greens.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
damonzzzz wrote:A pretty off topic comment but my mum hates listening to and seeing women talk about sport in the media.
It is actually pretty funny how much she can get worked up over it :lol: my wife is the same......lol she says "did she play" , or "what would she know" or " she is just there to get guys watching.......lol i have to be honest i have fantasies about Mel and Tara....LOL.....;) ;) ;)
|
|
|
damonzzzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 155,
Visits: 0
|
A pretty off topic comment but my mum hates listening to and seeing women talk about sport in the media.
It is actually pretty funny how much she can get worked up over it :lol:
|
|
|