TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
quite a few black people at this Trump event.
another Democrat/leftist myth busted...
[youtube]xEU8ivI9FlE[/youtube]
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote: because we disagree with you. Sorry I have to pull you up there. I don't care about his opinion enough to disagree. I just enjoy making this puppet dance :lol:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheCracker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9,
Visits: 0
|
[youtube]_1WCLk1AY-k[/youtube]
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheCracker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9,
Visits: 0
|
[youtube]eLydb7K6zmY[/youtube]
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheCracker wrote:[youtube]eLydb7K6zmY[/youtube] I like you. You're one that can go the distance =d>
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
Look whose making who dance...
the leftards have even resorted to openly supporting terrorists now
couldnt make this shit up :lol:
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheCracker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:Look whose making who dance...
the leftards have even resorted to openly supporting terrorists now
couldnt make this shit up :lol:
[youtube]GKJSzIEeqB4[/youtube]
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote: Where's the locking? -PB Granted, not quite the same as the dick you ate last night; but close enough.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote: Where's the locking? -PB Granted, not quite the same as the dick you ate last night; but close enough. Got proof of that dick m8? -PB
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote: Where's the locking? -PB Granted, not quite the same as the dick you ate last night; but close enough. Got proof of that dick m8? -PB Forum rules would prohibit.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheCracker wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:Look whose making who dance...
the leftards have even resorted to openly supporting terrorists now
couldnt make this shit up :lol:
[youtube]GKJSzIEeqB4[/youtube]
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote: Where's the locking? -PB Granted, not quite the same as the dick you ate last night; but close enough. Personal attacks: the safe haven and last resort of those without the mental capacity to make a logical coherent argument. =d> =d>
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote: Where's the locking? -PB Granted, not quite the same as the dick you ate last night; but close enough. Personal attacks: the safe haven and last resort of those without the mental capacity to make a logical coherent argument. =d> =d> I get personally attacked by all of these people after I provide logical coherent arguments and evidence. I have the right to respond in kind. I just happen to be better at it.
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
so TheFactOfTheMatter
is pro Putin, Pro Trump .....sound like a simple dumb white guy to me
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:so TheFactOfTheMatter
is pro Putin, Pro Trump .....sound like a simple dumb white guy to me racist
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:so TheFactOfTheMatter
is pro Putin, Pro Trump .....sound like a simple dumb white guy to me racist for calling you a simple dumb white guy? show some evidence
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheCracker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9,
Visits: 0
|
[youtube]h6WQJid_xAg[/youtube]
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:so TheFactOfTheMatter
is pro Putin, Pro Trump .....sound like a simple dumb white guy to me racist for calling you a simple dumb white guy? show some evidence
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Donald Trump's policies are even worse than you fear James Pethokoukis REUTERS/Jonathan Bachman March 1, 2016 The rest of the Republican primary season should focus, almost exclusively, on whether Donald Trump is fit to be the next American president. And the main reason GOP voters should question Trump's fitness for holding that highest of offices — much less leading the party of Lincoln and Reagan — is that he's running a racially-charged, divisive, and disingenuous campaign. He's engaging in, as Mitt Romney rightly tweeted yesterday, a "coddling of repugnant bigotry [that] is not in the character of America." Trump's policy views on, say, Medicare reform or top tax rates are secondary at best. His big idea, really, is that the basic answer to all of America's woes is the supergenius and negotiating prowess of Donald J. Trump. But looking at his agenda, as wispy and fantastical as much as it is, may give some clue as to the direction and substance of Trumponomics, should he win the Republican nomination and be elected president. And what he has proposed so far will hardly provide comfort to those who worry he's an unserious and unprepared candidate, at best. A few examples: Replacing ObamaCare: During the wonkiest moment of last week's GOP debate, Trump repeatedly and repetitively argued — to much mocking by Marco Rubio — that "we have to get rid of the lines around the states" so that there's more competition. Insurance companies could sell insurance according to the rules of whatever state they choose, and customers of any state could buy it. But few experts think that such a reform alone would do much to reduce costs or expand coverage in a post-ObamaCare world. Indeed, most center-right health-care plans include it as only one component of far more comprehensive reform. If "selling insurance across state lines" is the core of your ObamaCare replacement plan, then it roundly deserves to be mocked. Tax cuts: Three organizations — Citizens for Tax Justice, Tax Policy Center, and Tax Foundation — have given budget scores to the Trump tax plan. And all find the plan would sharply reduce government revenue, with an average loss to government coffers of $11 trillion over the next decade. That's the main reason why a Center for a Responsible Federal Budget analysis of Trump's economic plan finds it would double the national debt over the next decade. Of course, the Trump tax cuts might well boost economic growth. But according to CRFB analysis, it would require the economy to grow as fast as 9 percent a year for a decade to make the Trump plan revenue neutral and 11 percent to actually balance the budget. Those are ridiculous numbers. Only very poor countries playing catch up, like China in the 1990s and 2000s, grow that fast. U.S. growth in the booming 1990s, by contrast, averaged 3.5 percent a year. Mass deportations: Trump has promised to round up and send home some 11 million undocumented immigrants. The American Action Forum, a think tank led by former Congressional Budget Office boss Douglas Holtz-Eakin, has estimated it would take between $100 billion and $300 billion to arrest and remove them all, a 20-year process. Now if the price tag doesn't shake you, maybe this will: The Trump Deportation Force is also likely to vacuum up plenty of American citizens. An analysis by my AEI colleague Michael Strain suggests, conservatively, that perhaps 1 percent of total apprehensions would be in error. In other words, some 100,000 American citizens — about the same number of Japanese-Americans interned during World War II — would be at risk for deportation. Now who knows exactly whether Trump intends to push such policies or whether they are merely negotiation starting positions. For instance, there is some reason to think his morally repugnant deportation plan is little more than strategic posturing in advance of some future negotiations. And it wasn't so long ago that he was talking about wealth taxes and single-payer healthcare, a completely different set of policy choices. Yet if Trump has no fixed core beliefs — other than those that will provide momentary political advantage — what exactly are Republicans voting for? http://theweek.com/articles/609230/donald-trumps-policies-are-even-worse-than-fear
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Predictions for tomorrow?
Democrats:
Hillary runs the table bar Vermont, Oklahoma and perhaps Massachusetts. Bernie is obliterated everywhere else. This all but ends the Bernie campaign and the remaining primaries become a coronation for Hillary.
Republicans:
Trump wins all states bar Texas, which goes to Cruz. Rubio will get second in most states, and the media will portray it as a "win" and generate a false sense of "momentum" despite the fact he hasn't won a single primary. Unless Rubio and Cruz drop out, Trump will go onto win in Florida and Ohio and wrap up the nomination.
|
|
|
Lastbroadcast
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
If Bernie can't win Massachusetts, Colorado and Minnesota, his campaign will basically be over.
Trump will run the board, with the exception of Texas (Ted Cruz). Rubio will be the bridesmaid in most states.
|
|
|
JP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 0
|
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/writeup/the_gop_race_for_delegates_an_interactive_tool.htmlThis is interesting to play around with, for anyone interested. As far as tomorrow goes I expect it will all but confirm Trump and Clinton as the nominees - but none of the other candidates from either party will drop out.
|
|
|
JP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Scott Beauchamp wrote: [size=7]Donald Trump's disrespect for the military is appalling – and unprecedented[/size] So far, Trump has only insulted, abused and patronized service members and veterans on the trail. That’s no way to win our support
Donald Trump has disparaged many a group – most recently, he refused to flat-out denounce white supremacy – but his transgressions against the military have been less remarked upon.
The disrespect that the Republican frontrunner for the presidential nomination has consistently shown towards veterans and service members is unprecedented, especially for a member of the party that, at least nominally, prides itself on being more supportive of the troops.
On Friday, on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher, former head of the CIA and NSA Michael Hayden said that the American armed forces would “refuse to act” if a President Trump actually gave some of the orders that he’s been proposing on the campaign trail. Troops are required to refuse unlawful orders (as would be Trump’s proposed targeting of terrorists’ family members), but the statement reveals a deep antipathy that the defense establishment harbors for Trump. It’s an antipathy that I share as a former US army infantry soldier.
Trump’s disrespect of veterans began long before the current election cycle. On the Howard Stern show back in 1997, sandwiched in between a bunch of embarrassing comments about women, Trump compared his sex life in the 1980s to a war experience.
“I’ve been so lucky in terms of that whole world. It is a dangerous world out there – it’s scary, like Vietnam. Sort of like the Vietnam era. It is my personal Vietnam. I feel like a great and very brave soldier,” Trump bloviated. And while it’s true that being crass and disgusting is the entire point of the Howard Stern show, for someone who wants to be commander-in-chief of the armed forces to indulge himself by denigrating the war experiences of veterans is beyond the pale.
Trump has no way to know if dating has anything in common with combat, because he was a draft dodger. As Tim Mak wrote in the Daily Beast: “When Trump had the chance to join the military and fight in Vietnam, he did not take it. Instead, the rich kid got multiple student deferments from the draft and a medical deferment.”
Trump continued to inappropriately compare his civilian experiences to military ones since the Howard Stern appearance. Last year Trump told a biographer that he “always felt like I had been in the military” because of his time at the New York Military Academy, an expensive military-themed boarding school where Trump’s parents sent him because of behavioral problems.
That might be a uniquely idiotic statement from someone running for president, but it’s an attitude that, as a veteran, I’ve seen before. There’s always a guy at the bar sloppily explaining to you how he was in Junior Officer Training Corps during high school so, you know, he gets it. That guy should never run for office either.
A telltale sign that Trump does not actually know what it feels like to be in the military is his denigration of POWs. Last July at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa, Trump said of Arizona senator and former Vietnam POW John McCain: “He’s not a war hero. He’s not a war hero because he was captured. I don’t like people who were captured.” Who would want to go to war for a President Trump knowing that if you were captured in the heat of battle your commander-in-chief wouldn’t “like” you?
When Trump does gesture at supporting the troops, it rings hollow. He offers six figures to buy veterans groups as props to use during campaign rallies, as if risking life and limb for your country can be monetized. And his ads that are meant to show respect to veterans probably shouldn’t feature images of Soviet and Nazi soldiers rather than American troops. To lift one of Trump’s own favorite words: it’s pathetic.
Hayden was quick to point out on Friday that the armed forces wouldn’t foment a rebellion against Trump; they’d just refuse to obey unlawful orders. Nevertheless, it was a big statement that took even the usually nonplussed Bill Maher by surprise.
It shouldn’t have. For all his talk about leadership, something that Trump fails to understand is that real leadership is predicated upon respecting the people that you want to follow you. So far, Trump has only insulted, abused and patronized service members and veterans. It’s shocking that these kinds of tactics have gotten him this close to the White House, but it will never earn him the respect of the armed forces.
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
Google "Scott Thomas Beauchamp controversy". This guy is a serial liar and the Guardian should be ashamed to be publishing this bullshit. He was the one who slandered the military. They'll try anything to get at Trump. no gutter is too deep.
Once again JP dumps one into the back of his own net.
Edited by TheFactOfTheMatter: 2/3/2016 03:00:04 AM
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:Google "Scott Thomas Beauchamp controversy". This guy is a serial liar and the Guardian should be ashamed to be publishing this bullshit. He was the one who slandered the military. They'll try anything to get at Trump. no gutter is too deep.
Once again JP dumps one into the back of his own net.
Edited by TheFactOfTheMatter: 2/3/2016 03:00:04 AM You do realise that scott thompson beachump was a pen name. And that he recsnted allegedly. R3ally quoating the new Republic :lol: , yes i heard bout this since ,y unlce is a former navy in the us. And he posted about this long time ago
|
|
|
RedshirtWilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:so TheFactOfTheMatter
is pro Putin, Pro Trump .....sound like a simple dumb white guy to me racist for calling you a simple dumb white guy? show some evidence I don't know who to root for
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote: Where's the locking? -PB Granted, not quite the same as the dick you ate last night; but close enough. Got proof of that dick m8? -PB Forum rules would prohibit. No they don't. Don't be a softcock. -PB
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
saying on CNN, record turn out....
it hard to think the record turn out would be for Trump .
i've started talking odds of 7/1 for Rubio to be Republican Nominee....when you look at European elections, those crazy right or left people get a lot of support early form angry votes who want to show there angry but then everyone get worry those crazy might win, and start to vote normal
if the big turnout Today is for Trump, the Republican party is fucked :lol:
Edited by adrtho: 2/3/2016 09:29:23 AM
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:Predictions for tomorrow?
Democrats:
Hillary runs the table bar Vermont, Oklahoma and perhaps Massachusetts. Bernie is obliterated everywhere else. This all but ends the Bernie campaign and the remaining primaries become a coronation for Hillary.
Republicans:
Trump wins all states bar Texas, which goes to Cruz. Rubio will get second in most states, and the media will portray it as a "win" and generate a false sense of "momentum" despite the fact he hasn't won a single primary. Unless Rubio and Cruz drop out, Trump will go onto win in Florida and Ohio and wrap up the nomination.
I think Bernie is toast already, today will just confirm it. The goal for Sanders now will just be to maximise his performance so that his delegates can have a decent voice at the convention, and to try and pull Clinton to the left a little. I think you are likely correct re the republicans. The only alternate scenario I can see would be if Cruz lost Texas, then dropped out. That would then put things into confusion - how would his supporters break for Trump/Rubio? However, it seems that Cruz will win Texas, so no one will drop out. In a 3-way race, Trump will win.
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/super-tuesday-primaries-presidential-election-2016/Interesting live blog at the above link. Seems like it is a bit closer than expected. Something to keep in mind - most of these primaries are proportional e.g. anyone with over 20% of the vote will get some delegates. The later primaries are winner-take-all. So this is how the scenarios of Rubio running 2nd now, but winning the latter primaries, can do the arithmetic to give him enough delegates, or at least go to a contested convention.
|
|
|