TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
that feeling when you try to hit Trump and end up hitting yourself
[youtube]LltnLzLXs7U[/youtube]
EPIC FAIL
Edited by TheFactOfTheMatter: 5/3/2016 02:12:55 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
I wonder if Trump team will be send buses to the trailer parks to pick up his votes
|
|
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
betting odds after Debate
Hillary Clinton 1.56 (64%)
Donald Trump 5.25 (19%)
Marco Rubio 17.00 (6%)
Bernie Sanders 34.00 (3%)
Ted Cruz 40.00 (2.50%)
so betting market saying Trump only has 19% chance to become US Presidential
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
It's all a WWE style work where Trump gets built up hard to take the GOP nomination but then Jobs to Hillary at Presidentialmania. Montreal all over again. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:It's all a WWE style work where Drumpf gets built up hard to take the GOP nomination but then Jobs to Hillary at Presidentialmania.
Montreal all over again.
-PB Looking forward to this happening 8 November :lol: 
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
When will Ra Ra Donald be releasing his long form birth certificate?
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 520,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:It's all a WWE style work where Drumpf gets built up hard to take the GOP nomination but then Jobs to Hillary at Presidentialmania.
Montreal all over again.
-PB Looking forward to this happening 8 November :lol: What kind of sell was that by Trump.
|
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
[youtube]UEfCqouS3t8[/youtube]
|
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
[youtube]8Fg3XNTMzNo[/youtube]
|
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
the only decent Dem candidate was this guy
[youtube]2P9_BZWSy2E[/youtube]
|
|
|
|
|
switters
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
you need to get laid ricey. You spend way to much time in this section.
|
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDeathe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
People still want someone to blame for the GFC and everyone of the other candidates besides Trump were part of the political class that let the GFC happen and nor do they feel safe with the political class that let Benghazi happen lefted in charge.
Edited by GDeathe: 5/3/2016 06:27:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Trump number look to be low today...but it might also be the way many states today vote..Caucus votes are like a town meeting with people holding up hands, so only people who are already in Republican Party can vote Quote:When watching the results from Kansas and Maine, keep in mind that both are closed caucuses. That means you have to be a registered member of the party to participate, while many Trump supporters come from outside the Republican Party. Edited by adrtho: 6/3/2016 07:59:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Ted Cruz look to be almost 50% in both Kansas and Maine Quote:There’s so much going on in the race — including the differences between open primaries, closed primaries and caucuses — that everything is a little overdetermined. But it’s not that Cruz beat Trump in Kansas that’s a shock. It’s the margin that’s shocking: 27 percentage points (!) as I type this. Plus, Cruz possibly winning Maine, which would be a surprise by any margin. There’s the risk of reading too much into all of this this, but there’s the risk of reading too LITTLE into it also. We’ll know more after we see the results in Kentucky and Louisiana. http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/louisiana-kansas-kentucky-maine-primaries-presidential-election-2016/Edited by adrtho: 6/3/2016 09:55:29 AM
|
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
Cruz wins caucuses
Trump wins primaries
caucuses easier to rig/corrupt
|
|
|
|
|
JP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 0
|
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-needs-7-of-10-white-guys-213699?o=0This is an interesting read. It essentially argues that a Trump victory in the general is close to impossible given the demographics of the electorate.
|
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously.
|
|
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Trump is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views
|
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Trump is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views Legal reasons prevent me from betting on politics unfortunately. I'm not predicting a winner, I was commenting on the premise of the article and the retarded arguments it makes.
|
|
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Trump is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views Legal reasons prevent me from betting on politics unfortunately. I'm not predicting a winner, I was commenting on the premise of the article and the retarded arguments it makes. what legal reason?
|
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Trump is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views Legal reasons prevent me from betting on politics unfortunately. I'm not predicting a winner, I was commenting on the premise of the article and the retarded arguments it makes. what legal reason? State laws.
|
|
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Trump is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views Legal reasons prevent me from betting on politics unfortunately. I'm not predicting a winner, I was commenting on the premise of the article and the retarded arguments it makes. what legal reason? State laws. what state law...there no state law in Australia that says you can't bet
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Drumpf is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views Legal reasons prevent me from betting on politics unfortunately. I'm not predicting a winner, I was commenting on the premise of the article and the retarded arguments it makes. what legal reason? State laws. what state law...there no state law in Australia that says you can't bet There are two reasons he can't bet: 1. He's under 18 2. In South Australia you're not allowed to bet on elections (dumb law but it is what it is) Edited by mcjules: 7/3/2016 10:01:30 AM
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Drumpf is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views Legal reasons prevent me from betting on politics unfortunately. I'm not predicting a winner, I was commenting on the premise of the article and the retarded arguments it makes. what legal reason? State laws. what state law...there no state law in Australia that says you can't bet There are two reasons he can't bet: 1. He's under 18 2. In South Australia you're not allowed to bet on elections (dumb law but it is what it is) Edited by mcjules: 7/3/2016 10:01:30 AM oh really...there many dumb gambling laws...we have a law where you can't bet over the internet once a game has started , but you can over the phone
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
adrtho wrote:mcjules wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Drumpf is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views Legal reasons prevent me from betting on politics unfortunately. I'm not predicting a winner, I was commenting on the premise of the article and the retarded arguments it makes. what legal reason? State laws. what state law...there no state law in Australia that says you can't bet There are two reasons he can't bet: 1. He's under 18 2. In South Australia you're not allowed to bet on elections (dumb law but it is what it is) Edited by mcjules: 7/3/2016 10:01:30 AM oh really...there many dumb gambling laws...we have a law where you can't bet over the internet once a game has started , but you can over the phone Yes that law is nationwide (thanks Nick X). It made no sense to me either and almost completely futile now from what I understand because the mobile betting ads automate 90% of the calling process.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
adrtho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:adrtho wrote:mcjules wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Drumpf is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views Legal reasons prevent me from betting on politics unfortunately. I'm not predicting a winner, I was commenting on the premise of the article and the retarded arguments it makes. what legal reason? State laws. what state law...there no state law in Australia that says you can't bet There are two reasons he can't bet: 1. He's under 18 2. In South Australia you're not allowed to bet on elections (dumb law but it is what it is) Edited by mcjules: 7/3/2016 10:01:30 AM oh really...there many dumb gambling laws...we have a law where you can't bet over the internet once a game has started , but you can over the phone Yes that law is nationwide (thanks Nick X). It made no sense to me either and almost completely futile now from what I understand because the mobile betting ads automate 90% of the calling process. that law fuck me up big time, i was killing in-play AFL betting, made me have to go back to phone call at Q/T , H/T breaks
|
|
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:It's all a WWE style work where Trump gets built up hard to take the GOP nomination but then Jobs to Hillary at Presidentialmania.
Montreal all over again.
-PB HAHAHA! I appreciate any analysis involving the WWE.
|
|
|
|
|
salmonfc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.6K,
Visits: 0
|
What's more pathetic, a presidential candidate making fun of someone's dick size or another presidential candidate rushing to defend his dick size?
For the first time, but certainly not the last, I began to believe that Arsenals moods and fortunes somehow reflected my own. - Hornby
|
|
|
|
TheFactOfTheMatter
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 309,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:adrtho wrote:TheFactOfTheMatter wrote:What a completely retarded article. Only someone lacking in discernment ability and critical thought would take that drivel seriously. beeting odds saying the same thing...Donald Drumpf is $5.20 to be Presidential, less talk, go and become rich with your views Legal reasons prevent me from betting on politics unfortunately. I'm not predicting a winner, I was commenting on the premise of the article and the retarded arguments it makes. what legal reason? State laws. what state law...there no state law in Australia that says you can't bet There are two reasons he can't bet: 1. He's under 18 2. In South Australia you're not allowed to bet on elections (dumb law but it is what it is) Edited by mcjules: 7/3/2016 10:01:30 AM FOTM is a long way past 18 but mcjules has an obsession with children. I think its more of a fantasy for him. He's a very sick individual.
|
|
|
|