god make it end


god make it end

Author
Message
bluebird
bluebird
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
FlexerRevived wrote:
Yes, time has an affect on all things


Of course it does

No expansion in season 4 was costly
Turning down a $300m TV deal was costly
4 more years of 10 teams after 4 more years of 10 teams is proving costly

You might pin hopes on an ambiguous 10-20 year timeframe which you hope will just resolve everything but inaction every step along the way makes it moot

Throw 10 years at the start of the A League and did you picture we'd have 2 extra teams? No. Many would have said 14-16. It wasn't a magical cure


If you don't have a 10-20 year plan for implementing P/R then it simply isn't possible. Isolating the top tier and growing it separately to the rest of the football empire, and then hoping one day to link the two isn't a pathway forward. It is simply the level of thinking the current body has which is why things have worked out the way they have

If we introduce a semi professional 2nd div with hand picked secondary regions at the same cost of the youth league, to replace the youth league. And remove the salary cap with the view of linking both leagues in 3 years time - that is a plan. Obviously you have contingencies around it but you don't have to advertise those


Currently the FFA don't have a P/R plan. The league is a leaking dam wall and they are just looking at patching the biggest and most obvious leaks one at a time. The mess you wanted to avoid - we already have. You just can't see it



Pyramid Timmy
Pyramid Timmy
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
bluebird wrote:
No expansion in season 4 was costly
Turning down a $300m TV deal was costly
4 more years of 10 teams after 4 more years of 10 teams is proving costly


Costliest thing was going to Cities then pulling out
Benjamin
Benjamin
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K, Visits: 0
bluebird wrote:
FlexerRevived wrote:
Yes, time has an affect on all things


Of course it does

No expansion in season 4 was costly
Turning down a $300m TV deal was costly
4 more years of 10 teams after 4 more years of 10 teams is proving costly

You might pin hopes on an ambiguous 10-20 year timeframe which you hope will just resolve everything but inaction every step along the way makes it moot

Throw 10 years at the start of the A League and did you picture we'd have 2 extra teams? No. Many would have said 14-16. It wasn't a magical cure


If you don't have a 10-20 year plan for implementing P/R then it simply isn't possible. Isolating the top tier and growing it separately to the rest of the football empire, and then hoping one day to link the two isn't a pathway forward. It is simply the level of thinking the current body has which is why things have worked out the way they have

If we introduce a semi professional 2nd div with hand picked secondary regions at the same cost of the youth league, to replace the youth league. And remove the salary cap with the view of linking both leagues in 3 years time - that is a plan. Obviously you have contingencies around it but you don't have to advertise those


Currently the FFA don't have a P/R plan. The league is a leaking dam wall and they are just looking at patching the biggest and most obvious leaks one at a time. The mess you wanted to avoid - we already have. You just can't see it


All of this.
aussie scott21
aussie scott21
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
Quote:
FC Cincinnati: the third-tier US soccer team pulling in 20,000 fans a game

Futbol Club Cincinnati are not even a year old but they’re already getting bigger crowds than most MLS teams. What is the secret of their success?

Monday 16 May 2016 10.00 BST

When Bjorn Knudsen talks, the whiskers from his eyebrows and beard poke out of his orange, full-body suit. When Knudsen walks, his father, Chip, holds him by his shoulders, helping him keep balance and walk straight.

“No curb,” Chip says when they cross a street, making sure Bjorn doesn’t stumble.

Bjorn, with a massive bass drum strapped to his chest, begins beating the drum while others are chanting. “How can you see the drum?” someone shouts.

Bjorn, Chip and 150 others are marching just under a mile from Mecklenburg Gardens, a quaint corner bar, toward Nippert Stadium — the home to what’s quickly becoming America’s most fascinating new club.

Just over nine months ago, Futbol Club Cincinnati became the city’s latest attempt at professional soccer. Nine months later, FCC have become the most notable club in the United Soccer League — American soccer’s third tier — and has moved up the list of clubs campaigning to join Major League Soccer, a competition openly looking for new markets.

In their second home match on 19 April, FC Cincinnati had 20,497 fans attend a 3-2 loss to Louisville City FC, the team’s geographic rival. The attendance was a league-record (the previous high was 20,231 set by Sacramento Republic FC), dwarfing USL’s average of 3,369 in 2015. There are no more comparisons to other clubs; rather, there are other clubs comparing themselves to Cincinnati.

A club for the people, created by the businessmen
Perhaps the most impressive feat during FC Cincinnati’s rapid growth has been their ability to truly represent the full spectrum of soccer supporters in the area. While The Bailey, the club’s official supporters section, waves massive blue-and-orange flags and ignites smoke bombs, other sections of Nippert Stadium seat young families and casual fans attending just to witness the city’s latest craze.



Essentially, the club have created a massive community through a grassroots effort, despite having an owner and CEO, Carl H Lindner, who comes from a family of billionaires.

“We have a pride in this town,” says the club president and general manager, Jeff Berding. “We’re a major-league community. People rally around us to support their teams, sometimes with a chip on our shoulders.”

FC Cincinnati want attention, and the leaders of the club have provided fans with meaningful gestures. When the team have played on the road, both Lindner and Berding have gone to local bars in the city and across the Ohio River to Covington, Kentucky, to meet fans.

Combined with strong marketing and a community feel, FC Cincinnati are set to be the city’s long-term professional soccer team. And it’s a welcome addition for fans. In 2015, the Cincinnati Saints played in the National Premier Soccer League, the fourth tier, to an average of 200 fans. While there were passionate supporters, there wasn’t a sustainable strategy for growth.



Chip Knutdsen, who used to go to Saints matches, said the team overcharged for tickets and underproduced on the pitch. The Saints folded and became the Dayton Dynamo, now playing in the NPSL.

FC Cincinnati, however, have decided on a different tactic to the Saints, by offering cheap tickets to college students and children. Fans can also request that 20% of their ticket sale go to local youth soccer organizations.

And in terms of staff, the club went with one of the most recognizable players in US soccer history. “It’s been incredible, actually,” John Harkes says about his tenure as FC Cincinnati’s first coach. “From August, some people said starting from scratch would be impossible.”

Harkes played in England for Sheffield Wednesday, West Ham, Derby and Nottingham Forest, as well as in MLS and for the US national team. His appointment to FC Cincinnati was the club’s first hint at the seriousness the organization was taking in establishing a legitimate team. Harkes is in America’s National Soccer Hall of Fame.

Then came building a roster. Working with assistant coach Ryan Martin and goalkeeper coach Jamie Starr, Harkes and Berding assembled a side with more MLS experience than any club in USL.

Cincinnati native and centre-back Austin Berry was the first signing, becoming the club captain. Berry was the 2012 MLS Rookie of the Year. Another familiar name was Omar Cummings, a Jamaica international who played at the University of Cincinnati, as well as the Colorado Rapids and Houston Dynamo in MLS.

Cincinnati play an aggressive, attacking style, opening matches in a 4-3-3 and reshaping throughout the game. With players in interchangeable positions, Cincinnati often pull opponents out of shape. In the first nine matches of the season, nine different players have scored.

“When you’re starting a brand new club, you might have two or three players contributing,” Harkes said. “For us to have so many players scoring goals, creating assists, combination plays … it’s encouraging. We keep finding ourselves making our own future.”

Winning on the field and in the bleachers
Advertisement

This weekend the weather at Nippert Stadium at kickoff resembled a cloudy November day in Manchester rather than a spring afternoon in the American midwest. FC Cincinnati were attempting to get 25,000 fans in for the match against Pittsburgh Riverhounds.

The team wore a special orange jersey and asked fans to wear the same color for an “orange out,” inspired by the Cincinnati Bengals-Pittsburgh Steelers rivalry. A few Bengals served as honorary captains for the match too.

Once the match started, Cincinnati controlled play. With fluid passing and copious possession, Jimmy McLaughlin put the home side in front after 27 minutes, finishing a rebound off Pittsburgh keeper Mauricio Vargas.

The goal marked the first time Cincinnati had scored first in a match since the loss to Louisville City. Ultimately, McLaughlin’s effort, combined with keeper Mitch Hildebrandt’s composure, gave the team a 1-0 win and their first clean sheet in club history. After the result, FC Cincinnati sit second in the USL Eastern Conference standings through nine matches.

The crowd was 23,375 — a new USL record, surpassing the 19 April attendance. It’s a promising sign for the club ,and with better weather Lindner’s original target would probably have been met.

If the club can make a Lamar Hunt US Open Cup run and host an MLS team, the attendance record will likely be beaten again. And although it hasn’t been confirmed officially, one source close to the team said FC Cincinnati will play an English Premier League side sometime this summer in a friendly.

“I think the whole community has embraced us as a club,” Hildebrandt said. “It’s not a fluke. It’s a very special thing that’s happening here.”

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/may/16/fc-cincinnati-usl-record-attendances-soccer

Whether this is pro/rel or expansion related it the same thing.

Give clubs and communities something to work for or an opportunity and they will step up in the right areas.
The Dudist
The Dudist
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K, Visits: 0
Now that is interesting! 20k for a third tier team is a good commitment from the fans.
aufc_ole
aufc_ole
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K, Visits: 0
Good stuff (Y)
TheSelectFew
TheSelectFew
Legend
Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K, Visits: 0
Benjamin wrote:
bluebird wrote:
FlexerRevived wrote:
Yes, time has an affect on all things


Of course it does

No expansion in season 4 was costly
Turning down a $300m TV deal was costly
4 more years of 10 teams after 4 more years of 10 teams is proving costly

You might pin hopes on an ambiguous 10-20 year timeframe which you hope will just resolve everything but inaction every step along the way makes it moot

Throw 10 years at the start of the A League and did you picture we'd have 2 extra teams? No. Many would have said 14-16. It wasn't a magical cure


If you don't have a 10-20 year plan for implementing P/R then it simply isn't possible. Isolating the top tier and growing it separately to the rest of the football empire, and then hoping one day to link the two isn't a pathway forward. It is simply the level of thinking the current body has which is why things have worked out the way they have

If we introduce a semi professional 2nd div with hand picked secondary regions at the same cost of the youth league, to replace the youth league. And remove the salary cap with the view of linking both leagues in 3 years time - that is a plan. Obviously you have contingencies around it but you don't have to advertise those


Currently the FFA don't have a P/R plan. The league is a leaking dam wall and they are just looking at patching the biggest and most obvious leaks one at a time. The mess you wanted to avoid - we already have. You just can't see it


All of this.


This really got me going. Well said!


Aikhme
Aikhme
Pro
Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K, Visits: 0
expansion is on the cards. I think after this happens, prom/rel will soon follow.
Arthur
Arthur
World Class
World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K, Visits: 0
TheSelectFew wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
bluebird wrote:
FlexerRevived wrote:
Yes, time has an affect on all things


Of course it does

No expansion in season 4 was costly
Turning down a $300m TV deal was costly
4 more years of 10 teams after 4 more years of 10 teams is proving costly

You might pin hopes on an ambiguous 10-20 year timeframe which you hope will just resolve everything but inaction every step along the way makes it moot

Throw 10 years at the start of the A League and did you picture we'd have 2 extra teams? No. Many would have said 14-16. It wasn't a magical cure


If you don't have a 10-20 year plan for implementing P/R then it simply isn't possible. Isolating the top tier and growing it separately to the rest of the football empire, and then hoping one day to link the two isn't a pathway forward. It is simply the level of thinking the current body has which is why things have worked out the way they have

If we introduce a semi professional 2nd div with hand picked secondary regions at the same cost of the youth league, to replace the youth league. And remove the salary cap with the view of linking both leagues in 3 years time - that is a plan. Obviously you have contingencies around it but you don't have to advertise those


Currently the FFA don't have a P/R plan. The league is a leaking dam wall and they are just looking at patching the biggest and most obvious leaks one at a time. The mess you wanted to avoid - we already have. You just can't see it


All of this.


This really got me going. Well said!

Bluebird nailed it.
Timmo
Timmo
Pro
Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)Pro (3.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.4K, Visits: 0
Arthur wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
bluebird wrote:
FlexerRevived wrote:
Yes, time has an affect on all things


Of course it does

No expansion in season 4 was costly
Turning down a $300m TV deal was costly
4 more years of 10 teams after 4 more years of 10 teams is proving costly

You might pin hopes on an ambiguous 10-20 year timeframe which you hope will just resolve everything but inaction every step along the way makes it moot

Throw 10 years at the start of the A League and did you picture we'd have 2 extra teams? No. Many would have said 14-16. It wasn't a magical cure


If you don't have a 10-20 year plan for implementing P/R then it simply isn't possible. Isolating the top tier and growing it separately to the rest of the football empire, and then hoping one day to link the two isn't a pathway forward. It is simply the level of thinking the current body has which is why things have worked out the way they have

If we introduce a semi professional 2nd div with hand picked secondary regions at the same cost of the youth league, to replace the youth league. And remove the salary cap with the view of linking both leagues in 3 years time - that is a plan. Obviously you have contingencies around it but you don't have to advertise those


Currently the FFA don't have a P/R plan. The league is a leaking dam wall and they are just looking at patching the biggest and most obvious leaks one at a time. The mess you wanted to avoid - we already have. You just can't see it


All of this.


This really got me going. Well said!

Bluebird nailed it.


Agree with all of this but with the handpicked teams I cautioned that should a 2nd division be implemented I hope the best candidates for inclusion are picked regardless of state. It shouldn't be just about lowering travel costs and having solely VIC/NSW/ACT based teams except if that is where the best 8-12 clubs are found.

If you shut out well run teams from QLD, SA, WA and TAS who have the ambition and desire to step up but are excluding over the travel factor, then it will be another FFA about exluding clubs due to issue out of their control.

However as I said if the best 8-12 NPL clubs that can make the step up are from NSW/VIC then so be it. I can live with that.

a national 2nd division should take priority over A-League expansion. FFA cup so far has been the best thing as it cover every corner of Australia with clubs. Now to find the clubs who are willing to rise.
paulc
paulc
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
bluebird wrote:
FlexerRevived wrote:
Yes, time has an affect on all things


Of course it does

No expansion in season 4 was costly
Turning down a $300m TV deal was costly
4 more years of 10 teams after 4 more years of 10 teams is proving costly

You might pin hopes on an ambiguous 10-20 year timeframe which you hope will just resolve everything but inaction every step along the way makes it moot

Throw 10 years at the start of the A League and did you picture we'd have 2 extra teams? No. Many would have said 14-16. It wasn't a magical cure


If you don't have a 10-20 year plan for implementing P/R then it simply isn't possible. Isolating the top tier and growing it separately to the rest of the football empire, and then hoping one day to link the two isn't a pathway forward. It is simply the level of thinking the current body has which is why things have worked out the way they have

If we introduce a semi professional 2nd div with hand picked secondary regions at the same cost of the youth league, to replace the youth league. And remove the salary cap with the view of linking both leagues in 3 years time - that is a plan. Obviously you have contingencies around it but you don't have to advertise those


Currently the FFA don't have a P/R plan. The league is a leaking dam wall and they are just looking at patching the biggest and most obvious leaks one at a time. The mess you wanted to avoid - we already have. You just can't see it


I'd bet my house that your plans are doomed for failure by anything more we currently have seen to date. "Remove the salary cap and link both leagues in 3 years" :lol:

In a resort somewhere

TheSelectFew
TheSelectFew
Legend
Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K, Visits: 0
Is that the best you can come up with pauly?


paulc
paulc
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
As soon as I come on the forum you can bet TSF comes charging in frothing at mouth. :lol:

In a resort somewhere

TheSelectFew
TheSelectFew
Legend
Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K, Visits: 0
paulc wrote:
As soon as I come on the forum you can bet TSF comes charging in frothing at mouth. :lol:


Deflection.


paulc
paulc
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
TheSelectFew wrote:
paulc wrote:
As soon as I come on the forum you can bet TSF comes charging in frothing at mouth. :lol:


Deflection.


Deflection to suggest that you can't help yourself :lol:

In a resort somewhere

kaufusi
kaufusi
Pro
Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K, Visits: 0
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.
paulc
paulc
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


Wishful thinking in the name of traditional kulcha, that's what it is. P&R will happen one day but doesn't deserve to in this next generation or so.

In a resort somewhere

Aikhme
Aikhme
Pro
Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K, Visits: 0
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


I think you're dreaming.

there will be changes a lot sooner than 10 years let me give you the tip. They are mulling over things right now.
TheSelectFew
TheSelectFew
Legend
Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K, Visits: 0
paulc wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
paulc wrote:
As soon as I come on the forum you can bet TSF comes charging in frothing at mouth. :lol:


Deflection.


Deflection to suggest that you can't help yourself :lol:


Deflection.


TheSelectFew
TheSelectFew
Legend
Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K, Visits: 0
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


Are you a financial analyst with keen insight into the operations of football here and abroad.


paulc
paulc
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
Aikhme wrote:
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


I think you're dreaming.

there will be changes a lot sooner than 10 years let me give you the tip. They are mulling over things right now.


Are you part of the executive committee, have access to a report or better still own a crystal ball? Given the reaction of the governing body to date I'd suggest you may be further out in your tipping than you think.

In a resort somewhere

Arthur
Arthur
World Class
World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K, Visits: 0
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


We cannot develop a sophisticated football market without implementation of promotion and relegation.

Developing one part of the football ecosystem to the exclusion of the rest can lead to dire consequences for the game.

aufc_ole
aufc_ole
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K, Visits: 0
paulc wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
paulc wrote:
As soon as I come on the forum you can bet TSF comes charging in frothing at mouth. :lol:


Deflection.


Deflection to suggest that you can't help yourself :lol:

Like how you can't help yourself when a thread involes the NSL or former NSL teams in any way
Aikhme
Aikhme
Pro
Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K, Visits: 0
paulc wrote:
Aikhme wrote:
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


I think you're dreaming.

there will be changes a lot sooner than 10 years let me give you the tip. They are mulling over things right now.


Are you part of the executive committee, have access to a report or better still own a crystal ball? Given the reaction of the governing body to date I'd suggest you may be further out in your tipping than you think.


No I am not a member of the executive.

But I do have my sources and I do regularly speak my mind with both the Executive and the FFA.

It's a case of when not if.

I have had a reaction from the Governing Body, no once, but two times. SMFC is a serious option for them and things are not far off now as we stand.

Edited by Aikhme: 17/5/2016 01:00:00 PM
paulc
paulc
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
aufc_ole wrote:
paulc wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
paulc wrote:
As soon as I come on the forum you can bet TSF comes charging in frothing at mouth. :lol:


Deflection.


Deflection to suggest that you can't help yourself :lol:

Like how you can't help yourself when a thread involes the NSL or former NSL teams in any way


I never start them nor was it a topic of discussion in this thread but carry on.

In a resort somewhere

patjennings
patjennings
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
Arthur wrote:
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


We cannot develop a sophisticated football market without implementation of promotion and relegation.

Developing one part of the football ecosystem to the exclusion of the rest can lead to dire consequences for the game.


I don't think we are near P & R - but we need to be putting in the foundations for it now. Apart from the obvious suspects of the old NSL / current NPL teams there are many areas that are crying out for a HAL team. A semi-pro second division above the current NPL teams that concentrates the 'best of the rest/unrecognised' talent around Australia that captures these aspiring areas and clubs is a foundation that is needed for future promotion and relegation. This division could also provide a testing ground for future expansion.

I posted this in another thread.

The following areas have at some time expressed a desire to be represented in the A League.

Canberra (ACT)
Wollongong (NSW)
Southern Sydney (NSW)
Gold Coast – Tweed (QLD/NSW)
Sunshine Coast (QLD)
Hobart (TAS)
Casey (Vic)
Geelong (VIC)
Townsville (QLD)
Cairns (QLD)
Ipswich (QLD)
Darwin (NT)
Launceston/Northern Tas (TAS)
The Goldfields area (Ballarat and Bendigo) (VIC)
Coffs Coast/Lismore (NSW)

A second Brisbane, Perth and Adelaide team would also be needed and of course there are some ex NSL clubs that would no doubt want to make the move. Surely we can find 10-16 viable clubs/areas at a second division level to play above the current state NPLs. This can then be used as a stepping stone into the HAL.
paulc
paulc
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K, Visits: 0
Aikhme wrote:
paulc wrote:
Aikhme wrote:
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


I think you're dreaming.

there will be changes a lot sooner than 10 years let me give you the tip. They are mulling over things right now.


Are you part of the executive committee, have access to a report or better still own a crystal ball? Given the reaction of the governing body to date I'd suggest you may be further out in your tipping than you think.


No I am not a member of the executive.

But I do have my sources and I do regularly speak my mind with both the Executive and the FFA.

It's a case of when not if.

I have had a reaction from the Governing Body, no once, but two times. SMFC is a serious option for them and things are not far off now as we stand.

Edited by Aikhme: 17/5/2016 01:00:00 PM


Easy to say it's when, not if. You can't go wrong there as I'm sure it will happen one day as I have said. That's the question though, when. And it doesn't seem it will be soon just like when SMH thought they were going to buy Melb Heart about 10 times over or CCM :lol:

In a resort somewhere

Aikhme
Aikhme
Pro
Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K, Visits: 0
paulc wrote:
Aikhme wrote:
paulc wrote:
Aikhme wrote:
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


I think you're dreaming.

there will be changes a lot sooner than 10 years let me give you the tip. They are mulling over things right now.


Are you part of the executive committee, have access to a report or better still own a crystal ball? Given the reaction of the governing body to date I'd suggest you may be further out in your tipping than you think.


No I am not a member of the executive.

But I do have my sources and I do regularly speak my mind with both the Executive and the FFA.

It's a case of when not if.

I have had a reaction from the Governing Body, no once, but two times. SMFC is a serious option for them and things are not far off now as we stand.

Edited by Aikhme: 17/5/2016 01:00:00 PM


Easy to say it's when, not if. You can't go wrong there as I'm sure it will happen one day as I have said. That's the question though, when. And it doesn't seem it will be soon just like when SMH thought they were going to buy Melb Heart about 10 times over or CCM :lol:


Well, we are just gonna have to wait and see.

They would be crazy not to consider SMFC when they meet all the criteria, have Junior Development, a Social Club, and an overall great setup. They would also be crazy to turn down the extra 3 derbies and the revenue that would create as well as the premium on TV Rights.

It's inevitable that some of the clubs are going to step up and SMFC are on the forefront.

Why don't you call the FFA and get it from the horses mouth. They are pretty open about talking about future expansion plans as well as P&R. You just need to get of your arse and ask or put pen to paper.

Edited by Aikhme: 17/5/2016 02:39:09 PM
And Everyone Blamed Clive
And Everyone Blamed Clive
World Class
World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K, Visits: 0
Aikhme wrote:


They would be crazy not to consider SMFC when they meet all the criteria,


What criteria ?

Aikhme wrote:

It's inevitable that some of the clubs are going to step up .


10 years so far and none have, why so sure ?

Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award -  10th April 2017

bluebird
bluebird
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
TheSelectFew wrote:
kaufusi wrote:
Why do people keep crapping on about this. There is zero chance it will happen in the next 10 years, and highly unlikely even in 20 years time. 30-40 maybe by then we'll have a sophisticated enough market to have p+r, but we're a long way from there currently.


Are you a financial analyst with keen insight into the operations of football here and abroad.


People against P/R can't fathom it because they have a warped view due to the AFL / NRL model

They think a second division has to be fully professional with its own TV deal and attendances

They think we'll be adding team after team to the A League until we reach 25 or 30 teams and then we can split them into 2 leagues, and it would be viable because the code is in hot demand

In other words, something that no other code in this country can do despite their billion+ dollars - but strangely possible in 10 - 20 years


Once they accept low cost clubs fully funded by a shared TV deal, and shock horror, low attendances, then they'll realise P/R is not just possible, but it is possible tomorrow

We simply have to let go of our "security blanket" model and implement a structure that works for us



GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search