South Melbourne secures 40 years at Lakeside Stadium


South Melbourne secures 40 years at Lakeside Stadium

Author
Message
paladisious
paladisious
Legend
Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K, Visits: 0
South Melbourne wrote:
[size=7]Major Announcement: South Melbourne FC secures 40 years at Lakeside Stadium[/size]


South Melbourne FC and the Victorian Government formally executed the Club's new 40-year lease on its Lakeside Stadium exclusive areas earlier this morning. The licence for the Club's non-exclusive areas of Lakeside Stadium was also formally executed this morning.

SMFC President Leo Athanasakis described the executing of the documents as a historic moment, with the Club finally able to commence building its new administrational offices, futsal court and bisto / social room in its exclusive areas.

Mr Athanasakis thanked Mr Bill Papastergiadis and his legal team at Moray & Agnew Lawyers for finalising the legal documents. "Bill applied not only expert legal knowledge to the enormous difficulties faced by our club, he also utilised his significant connections with Government to ensure that an excellent deal was achieved. There is no doubt that we would not have achieved this result without Bill's contribution.

"This has come at significant personal cost, with Moray & Agnew Lawyers not charging any legal fees whilst Bill was on the SMFC Board of Management, therefore saving the Club over $200,000 in fees. History will record that as a significant turning point for us and I am sure that the entire South Melbourne family is extremely grateful to both Bill and Moray & Agnew."

Mr Papastergiadis thanked Mr Athanasakis and the SMFC Board of Management for their commitment in seeing the agreement through. "Without Leo’s dedication and his participation in all meetings, this great result would not have been possible."

Mr Papastergiadis also noted that the Greek Community of Melbourne is obliged to step in and assist any Greek entity in Victoria. "The Greek Community of Melbourne has to play a strong advocacy role for any Greek-based organisation. It became involved with the negotiations due to the rich contribution that SMFC has made to our Greek community for over fifty years and it wanted a positive result for the club."

Mr Papastergiadis then elaborated about the new agreements executed this morning. "These agreements allow SMFC to invest towards securing the Club's ultimate goal of playing top tier football in Australia. The infrastructure offered by the new Lakeside Stadium agreements are essential towards securing the long-term support of Football Federation Australia."

Mr Athanasakis also thanked State Labor Member for Albert Park, Mr Martin Foley MP. "Minister Foley’s involvement was critical in achieving such a positive outcome for our club in the agreements that have been executed today."

A very proud Mr Foley congratulated Mr Athanasakis, the SMFC Board of Management and Mr Papastergiadis. "South Melbourne FC's new 40-year lease gives the club the security and certainty that it needs to build for the future. SMFC has been a great club for many years and today's agreements now give it the opportunity to take its on-field and off-field activities to an even higher level.

"As the Local Member for Albert Park, I want to congratulate SMFC in negotiating such an excellent deal that secures its future at Lakeside Stadium and I look forward to visiting and utilising the Club's new facilities when they are completed."

Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
Somewhere eddie is crying
southmelb
southmelb
World Class
World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K, Visits: 0
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:
Somewhere eddie is crying


Why? He got what he wanted.
Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
southmelb wrote:
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:
Somewhere eddie is crying


Why? He got what he wanted.

Yes he did but rememeber when he realised that south was gonna some funding when he moved a.a down there he tried to stop it.
T-UNIT
T-UNIT
Pro
Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K, Visits: 0
But but but, how many years have they secured in the A-League?? :lol: :lol:
Benjamin
Benjamin
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K, Visits: 0
T-UNIT wrote:
But but but, how many years have they secured in the A-League?? :lol: :lol:


Club exists. Owned by it's supporters. With it's own home. Owns it's own IP. More secure than any A-league side.

If the opportunity comes along to play in the A-League, excellent, welcome it with open arms, but until then content to be the best we can be.
Pyramid Timmy
Pyramid Timmy
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
T-UNIT wrote:
But but but, how many years have they secured in the A-League?? :lol: :lol:


None.

Not selling out to Captain Cookie Cutter is their finest achievement.
theFOOTBALLlover
theFOOTBALLlover
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
I honestly believe if we introduced a few NSL/NPL clubs into the A-league the interest in the competition would go through the roof. Just look at the interest in the FFA Cup. The old and new clubs can co-exist in the same league.
azzaMVFC
azzaMVFC
World Class
World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K, Visits: 0
theFOOTBALLlover wrote:
I honestly believe if we introduced a few NSL/NPL clubs into the A-league the interest in the competition would go through the roof. Just look at the interest in the FFA Cup. The old and new clubs can co-exist in the same league.


I agree with this. I don't understand how the FFA just can't put together a certain criteria. If that criteria is met, entry into the A-League? I guarantee you most of the 'ethnic' clubs wouldn't be able to meet the criteria. South on the other hand, probably would.
theFOOTBALLlover
theFOOTBALLlover
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
azzaMVFC wrote:
theFOOTBALLlover wrote:
I honestly believe if we introduced a few NSL/NPL clubs into the A-league the interest in the competition would go through the roof. Just look at the interest in the FFA Cup. The old and new clubs can co-exist in the same league.


I agree with this. I don't understand how the FFA just can't put together a certain criteria. If that criteria is met, entry into the A-League? I guarantee you most of the 'ethnic' clubs wouldn't be able to meet the criteria. South on the other hand, probably would.


Agreed. A criteria does need to be made available to clubs.
Aikhme
Aikhme
Pro
Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)Pro (2.5K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K, Visits: 0
Benjamin wrote:
T-UNIT wrote:
But but but, how many years have they secured in the A-League?? :lol: :lol:


Club exists. Owned by it's supporters. With it's own home. Owns it's own IP. More secure than any A-league side.

If the opportunity comes along to play in the A-League, excellent, welcome it with open arms, but until then content to be the best we can be.


Yes, SMFC will still be around even after the day half the A League franchises go to the wall.

That;s when SMFC will get a licence.
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
Benjamin wrote:
T-UNIT wrote:
But but but, how many years have they secured in the A-League?? :lol: :lol:


Club exists. Owned by it's supporters. With it's own home. Owns it's own IP. More secure than any A-league side.


If the opportunity comes along to play in the A-League, excellent, welcome it with open arms, but until then content to be the best we can be.


Haven't seen this before. So South Melb could be financially viable in the HAL, even if drawing circa 5000 average crowds?

So FFA could admit them solely on a sound financial standing?
southmelb
southmelb
World Class
World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K, Visits: 0
Decentric wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
T-UNIT wrote:
But but but, how many years have they secured in the A-League?? :lol: :lol:


Club exists. Owned by it's supporters. With it's own home. Owns it's own IP. More secure than any A-league side.


If the opportunity comes along to play in the A-League, excellent, welcome it with open arms, but until then content to be the best we can be.


Haven't seen this before. So South Melb could be financially viable in the HAL, even if drawing circa 5000 average crowds?

So FFA could admit them solely on a sound financial standing?


The combination of a favourable lease and a social club which would be rocking on game day would hold us in pretty good stead even with such attendances. But after Sunday's events I don't think the remaining fans want in anymore:lol:
paladisious
paladisious
Legend
Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)Legend (40K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K, Visits: 0
southmelb wrote:
Decentric wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
T-UNIT wrote:
But but but, how many years have they secured in the A-League?? :lol: :lol:


Club exists. Owned by it's supporters. With it's own home. Owns it's own IP. More secure than any A-league side.


If the opportunity comes along to play in the A-League, excellent, welcome it with open arms, but until then content to be the best we can be.


Haven't seen this before. So South Melb could be financially viable in the HAL, even if drawing circa 5000 average crowds?

So FFA could admit them solely on a sound financial standing?


The combination of a favourable lease and a social club which would be rocking on game day would hold us in pretty good stead even with such attendances. But after Sunday's events I don't think the remaining fans want in anymore:lol:


Weird how they were fine with the flare trouble from South Melbourne's previous home game, and so put off by this one. Why do you think that might be?
hellas_johnny
hellas_johnny
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
Shows how much you know. The flare wasn't our home game it was at magic at paisley park
SydneyCroatia
SydneyCroatia
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
One was an object thrown from distance

Another was dozens of blokes running at them throwing cleaning chemicals and trying to belt them.

I know which id prefer.
southmelb
southmelb
World Class
World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)World Class (5.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K, Visits: 0
SydneyCroatia wrote:
One was an object thrown from distance

Another was dozens of blokes running at them throwing cleaning chemicals and trying to belt them.

I know which id prefer.


The Altona incident was also at a suburban ground where segregating fans is impossible, it's pretty hard to stop 1 trouble maker from launching a flare at a group of people...especially when it's dark and the main lights have gone out.

As you said the other had the main intention of trying to belt anyone in sight and the majority running from one side of the venue to the other to take part in it.
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search