tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xin the 3 years it's been going, the lower league clubs have improved dramatically. Not sure you could genuinely say it's because of this set up, but perhaps the professionalism has filtered through to all aspects of their game and they have something to aspire to. It's gone from a guaranteed pumping to a chance that the NPL teams will knock off any A-League side. Now, just imagine how much better local football would get if you had p/r. Well the NPL does have strict criteria, eg, coaching licences and stuff. So maybe you're right in that it isn't necessarily because of the NPL system, but I like to think that the system is somehow paying off for the clubs. Imagine 5 years from now! :w00t: yeah, the NPL + FFA Cup spotlight has been great imo. And yeah, hopefully fruitful times ahead
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xin the 3 years it's been going, the lower league clubs have improved dramatically. Not sure you could genuinely say it's because of this set up, but perhaps the professionalism has filtered through to all aspects of their game and they have something to aspire to. It's gone from a guaranteed pumping to a chance that the NPL teams will knock off any A-League side. Now, just imagine how much better local football would get if you had p/r. Not many NPL clubs have improved their style of football. They have become better organised as a defensive units, setting up not to lose and frustrate opponents, as opposed to trying to win. They have improved their fitness too, even though they are playing HAL clubs with heavy legs in preseason training mode. There are exceptions though - Bentleigh Greens play pretty decent football.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xIf they play out of Perry Park and like scott21 and others have suggested put in a temporary stand that brings it up to around 10k and they should be fine. I'm just over watching football in a empty stadium, no atmosphere and the same boring 10 teams in the A-League. Taking a break this season, not renewing my Roar Membership and may be looking at finally supporting a NPL Club. I'll be renewing my Roar membership, but I've been going to more and more NPL (and BPL) games over the last few years. I don't really have a team, but end up watching most clubs at some point throughout the season. The NPL games just have a different feel to the A-League games which I love. I don't know if I could say it's more or less enjoyable, but it's just a different way for someone to enjoy their football and I think that's important. Interesting comment. Maybe it is the novelty value and inclusiveness of the FFA Cup games that is so appealing? The inclusiveness of the cup is definitely a big part of it. I guess the novelty plays a part in the sense that we just don't get to see these sorts of games very often. After three years I don't think it's the FFA Cup itself that is still a novelty, more so the types of games that it allows football fans to watch. Plus the fact that some of the teams play some pretty damn good football. Seeing the NPL teams defeat A-League clubs, or at least hold them for most of the match, really makes me wish the NPL was televised (I know some teams like SM and HU do it). That second division would be awesome. The more domestic football in the media for the right reasons more often, the better. Good point.
|
|
|
Gayfish
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xin the 3 years it's been going, the lower league clubs have improved dramatically. Not sure you could genuinely say it's because of this set up, but perhaps the professionalism has filtered through to all aspects of their game and they have something to aspire to. It's gone from a guaranteed pumping to a chance that the NPL teams will knock off any A-League side. Now, just imagine how much better local football would get if you had p/r. Not many NPL clubs have improved their style of football. They have become better organised as a defensive units, setting up not to lose and frustrate opponents, as opposed to trying to win. They have improved their fitness too, even though they are playing HAL clubs with heavy legs in preseason training mode. There are exceptions though - Bentleigh Greens play pretty decent football. Strikers were the better attacking team last night, had more chances and looked like they wanted to win, City were crap in attack and defence so there goes your theory.
|
|
|
loki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xin the 3 years it's been going, the lower league clubs have improved dramatically. Not sure you could genuinely say it's because of this set up, but perhaps the professionalism has filtered through to all aspects of their game and they have something to aspire to. It's gone from a guaranteed pumping to a chance that the NPL teams will knock off any A-League side. Now, just imagine how much better local football would get if you had p/r. Not many NPL clubs have improved their style of football. They have become better organised as a defensive units, setting up not to lose and frustrate opponents, as opposed to trying to win. They have improved their fitness too, even though they are playing HAL clubs with heavy legs in preseason training mode. There are exceptions though - Bentleigh Greens play pretty decent football. Strikers were the better attacking team last night, had more chances and looked like they wanted to win, City were crap in attack and defence so there goes your theory. Green Gully outplayed CCM as well in the last round.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
#lopping 
|
|
|
walnuts
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x#lopping 
Literally amateur hour defending by City.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
@FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops
|
|
|
walnuts
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. This the marketing at work though. Entice them to watch becuase of Cahill but then hope they come back because of the comp.
|
|
|
kaufusi
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
That was the worst City have looked for a long time. Defence was woeful, incredibly disjointed attack. Never tested the NPL keeper at all, don't think he had more than one save to make all game, apart from the penalties.
Still a lot of gaps in that squad. No playmakers and no quality CB's or DMs. And No organisation. I can't believe City powerbrokers could be remotely satisfied with how the squad is shaping.
|
|
|
loki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x#lopping 
Literally amateur hour defending by City. My favourite bit is the airswing of the guy who was supposed to be marking him, had good position but decided, for some reason, to not go anywhere near the ball when it came in.
|
|
|
n i k o
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. It is great stuff, I agree. However why is it concern? The most well known player in Australian football is sought after to be watched on tv by the 'non purists' giving more exposure to the league and football in Aus.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThat was the worst City have looked for a long time. Defence was woeful, incredibly disjointed attack. Never tested the NPL keeper at all, don't think he had more than one save to make all game, apart from the penalties. Still a lot of gaps in that squad. No playmakers and no quality CB's or DMs. And No organisation. I can't believe City powerbrokers could be remotely satisfied with how the squad is shaping. Agree with all this, except the Strikers keeper made some good saves. The one saving grace was City build ups from defence to the attacking third with something like 80% of the possession. The build up problem was in the attacking third and creating scoring chances.
|
|
|
RedFunk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. It is great stuff, I agree. However why is it concern? The most well known player in Australian football is sought after to be watched on tv by the 'non purists' giving more exposure to the league and football in Aus. Yep, you will never satisfy the Cahill bitters on here no matter what he does. He has brought more viewership to the FFA Cup and in turn exposed the local game to an audience that probably would not have watched otherwise. Pull your head out your arses ffs.
|
|
|
n i k o
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. It is great stuff, I agree. However why is it concern? The most well known player in Australian football is sought after to be watched on tv by the 'non purists' giving more exposure to the league and football in Aus. Yep, you will never satisfy the Cahill bitters on here no matter what he does. He has brought more viewership to the FFA Cup and in turn exposed the local game to an audience that probably would not have watched otherwise. Pull your head out your arses ffs. Yeh Im not quite sure why its bad. I actually tried to think of a reason. I assume walnuts is a victory supporter so maybe there's a bit of bitter there. Maybe not, Im not sure. Without saying he is already a success, clearly cahills first game has achieved the intended outcome the FFA wanted (even though I'm against their whole approach to the league) and at very worst the positives far outweigh any negatives, if there are any at all.
|
|
|
Brenton1986
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.3K,
Visits: 0
|
I reckon it'll be either be played at Viking Park or at McKellar Park will be official venue for Canberra Olympic's home Quarter Final tie if they do manage to draw to host Hyundai A-League opposition in Canberra due to the far bigger capacity than Deakin Stadium and have more lighting lux for FOX Sports broadcast needs.
|
|
|
azzaMVFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Viking Park what a great name, stadium looks nice too:
|
|
|
salmonfc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Can't wait til our next FFA Cup match! Only 343 days to go.
For the first time, but certainly not the last, I began to believe that Arsenals moods and fortunes somehow reflected my own. - Hornby
|
|
|
walnuts
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. It is great stuff, I agree. However why is it concern? The most well known player in Australian football is sought after to be watched on tv by the 'non purists' giving more exposure to the league and football in Aus. Yep, you will never satisfy the Cahill bitters on here no matter what he does. He has brought more viewership to the FFA Cup and in turn exposed the local game to an audience that probably would not have watched otherwise. Pull your head out your arses ffs. Yeh Im not quite sure why its bad. I actually tried to think of a reason. I assume walnuts is a victory supporter so maybe there's a bit of bitter there. Maybe not, Im not sure. Without saying he is already a success, clearly cahills first game has achieved the intended outcome the FFA wanted (even though I'm against their whole approach to the league) and at very worst the positives far outweigh any negatives, if there are any at all. No bitterness - just concerned that the Cahill hype will paper over the cracks of real issues (no expansion, no second division etc). What happens when Cahill doesn't play? Do we plummet back to our previous levels and have to beg another famous face to come back and sell our souls to have their face plastered over everything?
|
|
|
loki
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. It is great stuff, I agree. However why is it concern? The most well known player in Australian football is sought after to be watched on tv by the 'non purists' giving more exposure to the league and football in Aus. Yep, you will never satisfy the Cahill bitters on here no matter what he does. He has brought more viewership to the FFA Cup and in turn exposed the local game to an audience that probably would not have watched otherwise. Pull your head out your arses ffs. Yeh Im not quite sure why its bad. I actually tried to think of a reason. I assume walnuts is a victory supporter so maybe there's a bit of bitter there. Maybe not, Im not sure. Without saying he is already a success, clearly cahills first game has achieved the intended outcome the FFA wanted (even though I'm against their whole approach to the league) and at very worst the positives far outweigh any negatives, if there are any at all. No bitterness - just concerned that the Cahill hype will paper over the cracks of real issues (no expansion, no second division etc). What happens when Cahill doesn't play? Do we plummet back to our previous levels and have to beg another famous face to come back and sell our souls to have their face plastered over everything? This is kind of valid. Getting airtime is important, but ensuring we leverage that airtime into enduring interest in the league is what makes it valuable. So far that's the missing ingredient that's eluded us everytime that we've gone the big name route.
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. It is great stuff, I agree. However why is it concern? The most well known player in Australian football is sought after to be watched on tv by the 'non purists' giving more exposure to the league and football in Aus. Yep, you will never satisfy the Cahill bitters on here no matter what he does. He has brought more viewership to the FFA Cup and in turn exposed the local game to an audience that probably would not have watched otherwise. Pull your head out your arses ffs. Yeh Im not quite sure why its bad. I actually tried to think of a reason. I assume walnuts is a victory supporter so maybe there's a bit of bitter there. Maybe not, Im not sure. Without saying he is already a success, clearly cahills first game has achieved the intended outcome the FFA wanted (even though I'm against their whole approach to the league) and at very worst the positives far outweigh any negatives, if there are any at all. No bitterness - just concerned that the Cahill hype will paper over the cracks of real issues (no expansion, no second division etc). What happens when Cahill doesn't play? Do we plummet back to our previous levels and have to beg another famous face to come back and sell our souls to have their face plastered over everything? How long does anyone reckon the 'Cahill Hype' will last ?
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. It is great stuff, I agree. However why is it concern? The most well known player in Australian football is sought after to be watched on tv by the 'non purists' giving more exposure to the league and football in Aus. Yep, you will never satisfy the Cahill bitters on here no matter what he does. He has brought more viewership to the FFA Cup and in turn exposed the local game to an audience that probably would not have watched otherwise. Pull your head out your arses ffs. Yeh Im not quite sure why its bad. I actually tried to think of a reason. I assume walnuts is a victory supporter so maybe there's a bit of bitter there. Maybe not, Im not sure. Without saying he is already a success, clearly cahills first game has achieved the intended outcome the FFA wanted (even though I'm against their whole approach to the league) and at very worst the positives far outweigh any negatives, if there are any at all. No bitterness - just concerned that the Cahill hype will paper over the cracks of real issues (no expansion, no second division etc). What happens when Cahill doesn't play? Do we plummet back to our previous levels and have to beg another famous face to come back and sell our souls to have their face plastered over everything? How long does anyone reckon the 'Cahill Hype' will last ? As long as Fox and co keep forcing it down your throat lol. -PB
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. It is great stuff, I agree. However why is it concern? The most well known player in Australian football is sought after to be watched on tv by the 'non purists' giving more exposure to the league and football in Aus. Yep, you will never satisfy the Cahill bitters on here no matter what he does. He has brought more viewership to the FFA Cup and in turn exposed the local game to an audience that probably would not have watched otherwise. Pull your head out your arses ffs. Yeh Im not quite sure why its bad. I actually tried to think of a reason. I assume walnuts is a victory supporter so maybe there's a bit of bitter there. Maybe not, Im not sure. Without saying he is already a success, clearly cahills first game has achieved the intended outcome the FFA wanted (even though I'm against their whole approach to the league) and at very worst the positives far outweigh any negatives, if there are any at all. No bitterness - just concerned that the Cahill hype will paper over the cracks of real issues (no expansion, no second division etc). What happens when Cahill doesn't play? Do we plummet back to our previous levels and have to beg another famous face to come back and sell our souls to have their face plastered over everything? How long does anyone reckon the 'Cahill Hype' will last ? As long as Fox and co keep forcing it down your throat lol. -PB If I don't have Fox, how do they get me to sign up ? Where do they advertise ? Optus ?
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x @FFACupWhat a night for the 64,000 who tuned into . Our highest broadcast figure outside of the two Finals. #3yearstops Was just about to post that haha - fucking fantastic stuff, although I am concerned that it may purely be down to the Cahill Circus being on the main channel. It is great stuff, I agree. However why is it concern? The most well known player in Australian football is sought after to be watched on tv by the 'non purists' giving more exposure to the league and football in Aus. Yep, you will never satisfy the Cahill bitters on here no matter what he does. He has brought more viewership to the FFA Cup and in turn exposed the local game to an audience that probably would not have watched otherwise. Pull your head out your arses ffs. Yeh Im not quite sure why its bad. I actually tried to think of a reason. I assume walnuts is a victory supporter so maybe there's a bit of bitter there. Maybe not, Im not sure. Without saying he is already a success, clearly cahills first game has achieved the intended outcome the FFA wanted (even though I'm against their whole approach to the league) and at very worst the positives far outweigh any negatives, if there are any at all. No bitterness - just concerned that the Cahill hype will paper over the cracks of real issues (no expansion, no second division etc). What happens when Cahill doesn't play? Do we plummet back to our previous levels and have to beg another famous face to come back and sell our souls to have their face plastered over everything? How long does anyone reckon the 'Cahill Hype' will last ? As long as Fox and co keep forcing it down your throat lol. -PB If I don't have Fox, how do they get me to sign up ? Where do they advertise ? Optus ? Geez you talk crap.
|
|
|
Brenton1986
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.3K,
Visits: 0
|
any idea if Lily Homes Stadium lighting standard is good enough to host A-League teams and there is a real possibility they could have hosting an A-League team in the FFA Cup quarter finals.
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
4 A-League teams will make the 1/4 finals. For an NPL to be sure to make the semis that means at least one game will be all A-League. MV play MC 15th October, semi finals start 18th. I'm guessing FFA will make sure of a Melbourne A-League derby the 24th or 30th of August to keep riding the hype train.
|
|
|
The Dudist
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Western Sydney V Blacktown would be good.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+x4 A-League teams will make the 1/4 finals. For an NPL to be sure to make the semis that means at least one game will be all A-League. MV play MC 15th October, semi finals start 18th. I'm guessing FFA will make sure of a Melbourne A-League derby the 24th or 30th of August to keep riding the hype train.  Could have both Melbourne and Sydney derbies, assuming WSW gets up over Edgy. I doubt the FFA would prefer that so early in preseason, though, and I'd prefer they'd hold off too as I'll be overseas for the Quarter Finals!
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x4 A-League teams will make the 1/4 finals. For an NPL to be sure to make the semis that means at least one game will be all A-League. MV play MC 15th October, semi finals start 18th. I'm guessing FFA will make sure of a Melbourne A-League derby the 24th or 30th of August to keep riding the hype train.  Could have both Melbourne and Sydney derbies, assuming WSW gets up over Edgy. I doubt the FFA would prefer that so early in preseason, though, and I'd prefer they'd hold off too as I'll be overseas for the Quarter Finals! I didnt see the BR PG game but SFC were pretty average against WW. Im not sure what impact Bobo will have but PG will be very strong one would think at home. However if they win one of the following matches will be played WSW SFC, WSW MV, WSW MC, SFC MV, SFC MC, MV MC. Iirc MC played SFC in their first comp match but they have a better profile today (and that match was at Ballarat). Possible big 1/4 match coming.
|
|
|