Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xFinch is fine in spinning and road conditions. He is diabolical early on in swinging and seaming conditions. It is what it is. Put him on a MCG road - a century will not surprise me at all. Send him to Kolkata for some Border Gavaskar - him slapping a big 50 or even a century - would not surprise me. Put him on a grassy wicket and he's out 3rd ball... ditto. Send him to the Ashes next year as an opener, I don't see him making drinks let alone lunch vs Jimmy. a first class average of 35 suggest he isn't that great on roads either to be fair Finch is fine on roads. He doesn't have all those ODI centuries against some talented bowlers, because pace worries him... Its his concrete feet and bat wafting at 4th to off and middle stump line. I think he's absolutely clueless to read seam and swing. The irony is - he is now an opener! Amazingly though, he does the same thing against spin, but middles the ball. I think its hard for cricketers to adjust to different pace of play I remember slats who was decent at test but hopeless at odi Mitch Marsh's ODI record implied he should be a once in a generation all rounder at test level but he's ordinary. Wish we had enough cricketers so everyone could specialize to a single format Slater is rather an exception and not someone to form a general rule from. The difference for players like Slats and even including Sehwag, is that their aggressive approach catches test captains napping, whereas in ODI - teams are on the defensive from the get-go so it has less effect. Look at Sehwag's test SR - better than most ODI openers of his generation. Finch is the opposite to Slats. Finch is quite similar to Guptill in NZ. Where all NZC fans were screaming at tv's for Guptill to smack it in tests, but he kept trying to block... And he would get out to a Jaffa. Hitters have to hit...
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xSlow going by the Baggies. we can bat for 5 more sessions if we are good enough. Doesn't matter how slow you go given the match situation Agree. Marsh put us in this holding pattern.. These two young blokes are doing a good job. would really like to see maxwell and renshaw in the team Renshaw yes. There are better batsmen out there than Maxwell. who? Kurtis Patterson,Jake Weatherald, Will Bosisto, Tom Cooper, Sam Heazlett. Baggers are you saying these 5 are BETTER than Maxwell? Patterson would be deemed an equal to Maxwell in the batting department, same number of FC games same average but Maxwell has scored 1 additional century, Maxwell also has a bowling aspect to his artillery Weatherald is an opener and some would argue a borderline shield player (av 32 at FC level) Tom Cooper plays for the Netherlands and is barely pushing a 35 average at FC level Will Bosisto? What are you smoking Baggers and where can I get some FC av of 24????? Sam Heazlett you're grasping at straws now. But I'll throw in Wade as a possible for his batting alone
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
i'd be open to white
getting old mind you
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xSlow going by the Baggies. we can bat for 5 more sessions if we are good enough. Doesn't matter how slow you go given the match situation Agree. Marsh put us in this holding pattern.. These two young blokes are doing a good job. would really like to see maxwell and renshaw in the team Renshaw yes. There are better batsmen out there than Maxwell. who? Kurtis Patterson,Jake Weatherald, Will Bosisto, Tom Cooper, Sam Heazlett. But I'll throw in Wade as a possible for his batting alone Nuggety... tough... gritty... uncompromising... and bowling average of 23.8.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
if you went the top 6 aussie players who have played at least 20 1st class matches who has the best averages?
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+xif you went the top 6 aussie players who have played at least 20 1st class matches who has the best averages? Good Question Not much going around presently. This year Wade is up there overall ave about 40, last 3 or 4 years consistently is Burns averaging over 40 as is Cameron White. Jake Lehmann was one to watch but seems to be on a steady decline, Alex Doolan is one performing this year but overall has been on a steady decline I think averages 33. So apart from Burns and possibly Patterson, I personally can't see a better option than Maxwell or Wade, apart from those who are playing currently for Australia...very very sad! And it does show at FC level when bowlers like Cummins, Starc, Neser, Copeland Sayers J Richardson are currently matching the batsmen in averages at FC level Obviously Smith and Khawaja are the top. Last year Burns White Maxwell Ferguson Head and Renhaw were the leading averages of those that played more than 5 games.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThat Indian attack was really good yesterday. I can't remember seeing them bowl as well as a collective unit in Australia before. I think India will win the series. Even though the Australian players are trying their hardest, the batting just doesn't have the quality to win games in test cricket against tough opposition. Both attacks have been good. Clearly a bowlers's wicket. Ashwin smells blood. He will be dangerous in second innings. I disagree that it is a bowlers wicket, just some proper shit batting. I expect a specialist seamer such as Hazlewood would be enjoying a grassy deck for a change.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xi'd be open to white getting old mind you White is three days younger than SOS. With a superior FC record.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
looks like the bounce is hard to predict and there hasn't been convincing drives from either side
If you can't drive its a hard wicket to bat on
Wickets like this can paradoxically reward bipolar tactics
wreckless adam gilchrist like agression can make a mockery of the conditions. Alternatively ultra conservative pujar type batting can be very effective too
Australia played with a lot of heart here really tiring out the bowlers and apart from batters showed a lot of discipline. We may just lack the skill sadly
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Some good hitting by Lyon has us only 15 behind the Indians.
|
|
|
City Sam
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThat Indian attack was really good yesterday. I can't remember seeing them bowl as well as a collective unit in Australia before. I think India will win the series. Even though the Australian players are trying their hardest, the batting just doesn't have the quality to win games in test cricket against tough opposition. Both attacks have been good. Clearly a bowlers's wicket. Ashwin smells blood. He will be dangerous in second innings. I disagree that it is a bowlers wicket, just some proper shit batting. I expect a specialist seamer such as Hazlewood would be enjoying a grassy deck for a change. The bowl isn't doing much, just because it isn't a complete road doesn't make it a bowlers wicket. Just shows how poor batters are becoming
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xThat Indian attack was really good yesterday. I can't remember seeing them bowl as well as a collective unit in Australia before. I think India will win the series. Even though the Australian players are trying their hardest, the batting just doesn't have the quality to win games in test cricket against tough opposition. Both attacks have been good. Clearly a bowlers's wicket. Ashwin smells blood. He will be dangerous in second innings. I disagree that it is a bowlers wicket, just some proper shit batting. I expect a specialist seamer such as Hazlewood would be enjoying a grassy deck for a change. The bowl isn't doing much, just because it isn't a complete road doesn't make it a bowlers wicket. Just shows how poor batters are becoming Philosophical post. I like it.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xSlow going by the Baggies. we can bat for 5 more sessions if we are good enough. Doesn't matter how slow you go given the match situation Agree. Marsh put us in this holding pattern.. These two young blokes are doing a good job. would really like to see maxwell and renshaw in the team Renshaw yes. There are better batsmen out there than Maxwell. who? Kurtis Patterson,Jake Weatherald, Will Bosisto, Tom Cooper, Sam Heazlett. Baggers are you saying these 5 are BETTER than Maxwell? Patterson would be deemed an equal to Maxwell in the batting department, same number of FC games same average but Maxwell has scored 1 additional century, Maxwell also has a bowling aspect to his artillery Weatherald is an opener and some would argue a borderline shield player (av 32 at FC level) Tom Cooper plays for the Netherlands and is barely pushing a 35 average at FC level Will Bosisto? What are you smoking Baggers and where can I get some FC av of 24????? Sam Heazlett you're grasping at straws now. But I'll throw in Wade as a possible for his batting alone Cooper is an Australian. Is the only batsman to score two tons this year and came within a whisker of a third today.. If after all this time he has finally found some consistency then perhaps he is ready for a Baggy Green. Patterson has done sufficient. I would prefer a bloke who churns out regular 50s and the odd hundred over someone that may make a ton here a ton there and in between cheap scores. The other three have the potential to play long innings for Australia as they know how to put a price on their wicket. While you were slumming it in NZ Heazlett was playing a defining knock that gave the Bulls and unlikely draw. Bosisto did something similar for WA. That is why he is on that list. These types are gold. He could also be another late bloomer. He has captained his country taking Oz to a world cup final. Weatherald has dropped off the vine this year. Still I reckon he has the game to play at Test level. Wade.. give me a break. Check out his miserable batting record when he had the Aussie gloves.
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Baggers, you seriously jump around on selection ideas to literally who just scored the most recent century or runs...
With respect, I really do not think this is a good philosophy.
You want to get the best in there.
Yes - you want them to be in form, but they do not need to be leading the charts in form.
A well established pool of results, with some recent form - I think is the best way to go...
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBaggers, you seriously jump around on selection ideas to literally who just scored the most recent century or runs... With respect, I really do not think this is a good philosophy. You want to get the best in there. Yes - you want them to be in form, but they do not need to be leading the charts in form. A well established pool of results, with some recent form - I think is the best way to go... There aint any cementing their spot so we have to look for alternatives. Khawaja and Head are the only two that warrant a place in next test. Langer said he wanted Shield runs. Well those blokes I have named have scored shield runs. Alex Doolan could also be on that list. A solid performer over the years.. got a bum deal last time he played tests. Cam White and George Bailey I also like. They have solid shield performances over many years to bring to the table. The biggest thing is they all have vast experience. Marsh has failed as the father figure.. now for someone else.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBaggers, you seriously jump around on selection ideas to literally who just scored the most recent century or runs... With respect, I really do not think this is a good philosophy. You want to get the best in there. Yes - you want them to be in form, but they do not need to be leading the charts in form. A well established pool of results, with some recent form - I think is the best way to go... There aint any. This is why I am clutching at straws. But a bloke who demonstrates regularly he values his wicket gets my vote every time. best first class averages and thats it imo if you chase short term form its always chasing your tail. It takes 20 matches to acclimatize to test cricket by which time your short term form is gone and you reproduce your first class average
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xif you went the top 6 aussie players who have played at least 20 1st class matches who has the best averages? Here are the best class first class averages I can find plus a few notable others Steve Smith - 57.27 David Warner - 48.63 Usman Khawaja - 44.17 Shaun Marsh - 41.21 Kurtis Patterson - 40.95 Glenn Maxwell - 40.56 Joe Burns - 40.51 Cameron White - 40.23 Matthew Wade - 39.42 Peter Handscomb - 39.22 Jake Lehmann - 38.98 George Bailey - 38.57 Cullum Ferguson - 38.37 Cameron Bancroft - 38.35 Matt Renshaw - 38.23 Peter Nevill - 37.25 Travis Head - 36.82 Hilton Cartwright - 36.81 Aaron Finch - 36.40 Marcus Harris - 35.49 Nic Maddinson - 34.75 Tom Cooper - 34.19 Alex Doolan - 34.13 Marcus Stoinis - 33.14 Marnus Labuschagne - 32.72 Jake Weatherald - 32.67 Mitch Marsh - 32.15 Tim Paine - 29.94 Alex Carey - 26.95 William Bosisto - 24.67 I feel it is time to get Kurtis Patterson in the team and Joe Burns is a good option as well. After that Matthew Wade might be as good as anyone. Peter Nevill was largely dropped from the test team because of his batting yet he has a higher first class average than 3 of the current top 6.
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBaggers, you seriously jump around on selection ideas to literally who just scored the most recent century or runs... With respect, I really do not think this is a good philosophy. You want to get the best in there. Yes - you want them to be in form, but they do not need to be leading the charts in form. A well established pool of results, with some recent form - I think is the best way to go... There aint any. This is why I am clutching at straws. But a bloke who demonstrates regularly he values his wicket gets my vote every time. best first class averages and thats it imo if you chase short term form its always chasing your tail. It takes 20 matches to acclimatize to test cricket by which time your short term form is gone and you reproduce your first class average First class averages although with a player like Marcus Harris he is clearly improving his average. 2015/16 27.40 last season in WA 2016/17 42.42 first season for Victoria 2017/18 41.52 2018/19 71.57 So it is quite clear he struggled as a young batsman but moving states and getting a bit older has turned him into a much better player. So while his over average is still being dragged down by his early poor start to his career his last 3 seasons have been well over 40 in average. Very good for any player and especially for an opener at the moment.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xif you went the top 6 aussie players who have played at least 20 1st class matches who has the best averages? Steve Smith - 57.27 David Warner - 48.63 Usman Khawaja - 44.17 Shaun Marsh - 41.21 Kurtis Patterson - 40.95 Glenn Maxwell - 40.56Steve Smith - 57.27David Warner - 48.63Usman Khawaja - 44.17Shaun Marsh - 41.21Kurtis Patterson - 40.95Steve Smith - 57.27 David Warner - 48.63 Usman Khawaja - 44.17 Shaun Marsh - 41.21 Kurtis Patterson - 40.95 Here are the best class first class averages I can find plus a few notable others Steve Smith - 57.27 David Warner - 48.63 Usman Khawaja - 44.17 Shaun Marsh - 41.21 Kurtis Patterson - 40.95 Glenn Maxwell - 40.56 Joe Burns - 40.51 Cameron White - 40.23 Matthew Wade - 39.42 Peter Handscomb - 39.22 Jake Lehmann - 38.98 George Bailey - 38.57 Cullum Ferguson - 38.37 Cameron Bancroft - 38.35 Matt Renshaw - 38.23 Peter Nevill - 37.25 Travis Head - 36.82 Hilton Cartwright - 36.81 Aaron Finch - 36.40 Marcus Harris - 35.49 Nic Maddinson - 34.75 Tom Cooper - 34.19 Alex Doolan - 34.13 Marcus Stoinis - 33.14 Marnus Labuschagne - 32.72 Jake Weatherald - 32.67 Mitch Marsh - 32.15 Tim Paine - 29.94 Alex Carey - 26.95 William Bosisto - 24.67 I feel it is time to get Kurtis Patterson in the team and Joe Burns is a good option as well. After that Matthew Wade might be as good as anyone. Peter Nevill was largely dropped from the test team because of his batting yet he has a higher first class average than 3 of the current top 6. well there is your top 6 Warner Khawaja Patterson Steve Smith Marsh Maxwell Actually that looks a team that can be competitive on the road unlike our current lot Hopefully Harris and Pukavic and continue their rise and replace the two weakest batsmen Maxwell and Patterson but for now that should be our team. Cricket is the polar opposite of, say, rugby league where stats pretty much tell you everything
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBaggers, you seriously jump around on selection ideas to literally who just scored the most recent century or runs... With respect, I really do not think this is a good philosophy. You want to get the best in there. Yes - you want them to be in form, but they do not need to be leading the charts in form. A well established pool of results, with some recent form - I think is the best way to go... There aint any. This is why I am clutching at straws. But a bloke who demonstrates regularly he values his wicket gets my vote every time. best first class averages and thats it imo if you chase short term form its always chasing your tail. It takes 20 matches to acclimatize to test cricket by which time your short term form is gone and you reproduce your first class average Yes FC averages should be the yardstick to selection. I can live with Patterson, Burns, White and even Maxwell. Are Ussie and even Head stone cold certainties? Harris deserves some time to acclimatise. He has potential. Renshaw will be back.. We also have to remember Smith is a certainty to return for the Ashes. Warner also. Tho I reckon he is on the wane. So given we have the top three penciled in.. with Burns also an option there,Patterson gets my vote at #4, White #5 Maxwell or Bailey #6
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xBaggers, you seriously jump around on selection ideas to literally who just scored the most recent century or runs... With respect, I really do not think this is a good philosophy. You want to get the best in there. Yes - you want them to be in form, but they do not need to be leading the charts in form. A well established pool of results, with some recent form - I think is the best way to go... There aint any. This is why I am clutching at straws. But a bloke who demonstrates regularly he values his wicket gets my vote every time. best first class averages and thats it imo if you chase short term form its always chasing your tail. It takes 20 matches to acclimatize to test cricket by which time your short term form is gone and you reproduce your first class average First class averages although with a player like Marcus Harris he is clearly improving his average. 2015/16 27.40 last season in WA 2016/17 42.42 first season for Victoria 2017/18 41.52 2018/19 71.57 So it is quite clear he struggled as a young batsman but moving states and getting a bit older has turned him into a much better player. So while his over average is still being dragged down by his early poor start to his career his last 3 seasons have been well over 40 in average. Very good for any player and especially for an opener at the moment. yeah i'm divided on his conclusion. Sometimes its worth getting them in early though so its a defensible decision
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xBaggers, you seriously jump around on selection ideas to literally who just scored the most recent century or runs... With respect, I really do not think this is a good philosophy. You want to get the best in there. Yes - you want them to be in form, but they do not need to be leading the charts in form. A well established pool of results, with some recent form - I think is the best way to go... There aint any. This is why I am clutching at straws. But a bloke who demonstrates regularly he values his wicket gets my vote every time. best first class averages and thats it imo if you chase short term form its always chasing your tail. It takes 20 matches to acclimatize to test cricket by which time your short term form is gone and you reproduce your first class average Yes FC averages should be the yardstick to selection. I can live with Patterson, Burns, White and even Maxwell. Harris deserves some time to acclimatise. He has potential. Renshaw will be back. Has too much going for him not to. We also have to remember Smith is a certainty to return for the Ashes. Warner also. Tho I reckon he is on the wane. So given we have the top three penciled in.. Patterson gets my vote at #4, White #5 Burns or Maxwell or Bailey #6 patterson and maxwell still quite young despite having lots of experience so worth investing 20-30 games
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
early days but the slow run rate continues
|
|
|
City Sam
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xearly days but the slow run rate continues Learned from their first innings, just see out the new ball and the runs will come
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xearly days but the slow run rate continues Learned from their first innings, just see out the new ball and the runs will come if we lose another 20 overs to rain draw is in play so they might want a move on
|
|
|
City Sam
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xearly days but the slow run rate continues Learned from their first innings, just see out the new ball and the runs will come if we lose another 20 overs to rain draw is in play so they might want a move on There's ages to go in the test and no more rain forecasted for the remainder.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xearly days but the slow run rate continues Learned from their first innings, just see out the new ball and the runs will come if we lose another 20 overs to rain draw is in play so they might want a move on There's ages to go in the test and no more rain forecasted for the remainder. actually there is rain on the radar for around an hour from now
|
|
|
City Sam
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xearly days but the slow run rate continues Learned from their first innings, just see out the new ball and the runs will come if we lose another 20 overs to rain draw is in play so they might want a move on There's ages to go in the test and no more rain forecasted for the remainder. actually there is rain on the radar for around an hour from now And even so they are in no rush, wickets are important they have a team of T20 batters to speed up the run rate as we are seeing. All they had to do was see out the new ball and they did, this ball is doing nothing anymore.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xBaggers, you seriously jump around on selection ideas to literally who just scored the most recent century or runs... With respect, I really do not think this is a good philosophy. You want to get the best in there. Yes - you want them to be in form, but they do not need to be leading the charts in form. A well established pool of results, with some recent form - I think is the best way to go... There aint any. This is why I am clutching at straws. But a bloke who demonstrates regularly he values his wicket gets my vote every time. best first class averages and thats it imo if you chase short term form its always chasing your tail. It takes 20 matches to acclimatize to test cricket by which time your short term form is gone and you reproduce your first class average Yes FC averages should be the yardstick to selection. I can live with Patterson, Burns, White and even Maxwell. Harris deserves some time to acclimatise. He has potential. Renshaw will be back. Has too much going for him not to. We also have to remember Smith is a certainty to return for the Ashes. Warner also. Tho I reckon he is on the wane. So given we have the top three penciled in.. Patterson gets my vote at #4, White #5 Burns or Maxwell or Bailey #6 patterson and maxwell still quite young despite having lots of experience so worth investing 20-30 games Patterson is. Just turned 25. Maxwell is nearing 30 isnt he? So no time to invest in him. He has to nail it from the start to convince selectors. You saying Patterson is a touch weak temperament wise given he does not convert all that often?
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
This deck has lost some life . Runs will start flowing now. Our quicks have to be disciplined in their lines and lengths.
|
|
|