|
elksy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 300,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe competition will not grow without finding a way to reduce ticket prices to increase demand.
Why would Macarthur FC need higher prices anyway when it is meant to have the best stadium deal in the competition? Something really doesn’t add up there. Macarthur has to pay its license fee off although it has been agreed that it can be paid over a longer period. They are getting a lower distribution than they were expecting and sponsorship is not as available as it was when they did their budgeting. Regardless of having to play off a license, these ticket prices are honestly a disgrace, for an away ticket I can fund two months of Kayo and watch every a league game over 8 weeks. Or I could purchase a platinum ticket for another $5? It so sad that this team has killed off there active support before it was even able to show up. The active support, away fans they generate the atmosphere and are the reason people attend matches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
That link says nothing ffs.
Clubs do not have a god given exclusive right to a territory - if they did pro-rel cannot happen - WSW can define an area that they want to target but that doesn’t give them exclusive rights to it ... other clubs can operate in that same area so anyone saying “stay out”
is thinking like Lowy did. And it’s anti-football thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"? I don't think anyone in Bankstown would call Macarthur their local team. People in this area would most likely be split between Sydney FC and Western Sydney Wanderers. Bankstown is borderline between all three, I would say, and if Macarthur take the initiative then good on them. Claiming Northbridge is taking the piss, though. To get licensed to compete in the next ACL, if they were to qualify, they have to have a youth development system in their entity now or in an entity that is allied to their entity now. The Northbridge FC alliance satisfies this requirement. Football NSW should do the right thing and sanction Northbridge FC and boot them from all NSW NPL competitions (Senior and Youth). The fuckwits don't deserve a crack at the ACL Instead of worrying about what other clubs do I suggest that it would better if you spent your time worrying about the incompetent management of our club that has seen us become a laughing stock for the last 3 or 4 years.
|
|
|
|
|
lebo_roo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"? Bankstown was considered to be part of south west Sydney when I lived there in the 50's, 60's and 70"s. I have lived in Bankstown all my life and i am almost 40 and i believe it's South West but fuck being associated with Campbelltown bogans.
|
|
|
|
|
lebo_roo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Big bully Sam Krslovic is running this club like he doesnt give a fuck and many fans will be turned off.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul01
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"? I don't think anyone in Bankstown would call Macarthur their local team. People in this area would most likely be split between Sydney FC and Western Sydney Wanderers. Bankstown is borderline between all three, I would say, and if Macarthur take the initiative then good on them. Claiming Northbridge is taking the piss, though. To get licensed to compete in the next ACL, if they were to qualify, they have to have a youth development system in their entity now or in an entity that is allied to their entity now. The Northbridge FC alliance satisfies this requirement. Football NSW should do the right thing and sanction Northbridge FC and boot them from all NSW NPL competitions (Senior and Youth). The fuckwits don't deserve a crack at the ACL
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"? I don't think anyone in Bankstown would call Macarthur their local team. People in this area would most likely be split between Sydney FC and Western Sydney Wanderers. Bankstown is borderline between all three, I would say, and if Macarthur take the initiative then good on them. Claiming Northbridge is taking the piss, though. To get licensed to compete in the next ACL, if they were to qualify, they have to have a youth development system in their entity now or in an entity that is allied to their entity now. The Northbridge FC alliance satisfies this requirement. Aha now the other shoe drops.... thanks for the info. I was wondering why they so shamelessly took CCMs sloppy seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"? I don't think anyone in Bankstown would call Macarthur their local team. People in this area would most likely be split between Sydney FC and Western Sydney Wanderers. Bankstown is borderline between all three, I would say, and if Macarthur take the initiative then good on them. Claiming Northbridge is taking the piss, though. To get licensed to compete in the next ACL, if they were to qualify, they have to have a youth development system in their entity now or in an entity that is allied to their entity now. The Northbridge FC alliance satisfies this requirement.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul01
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Incorrect Check out the the link https://www.wswanderersfc.com.au/community-philosophyIncorrect. Check out the link https://www.wswanderersfc.com.au/community-philosophy
|
|
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"? I don't think anyone in Bankstown would call Macarthur their local team. People in this area would most likely be split between Sydney FC and Western Sydney Wanderers. Bankstown is borderline between all three, I would say, and if Macarthur take the initiative then good on them. Claiming Northbridge is taking the piss, though. You have more chance of winning the lotto than you do finding someone going for WSW or Macarthur and living in or around Northbridge.
|
|
|
|
|
df1982
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 861,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"? I don't think anyone in Bankstown would call Macarthur their local team. People in this area would most likely be split between Sydney FC and Western Sydney Wanderers. Bankstown is borderline between all three, I would say, and if Macarthur take the initiative then good on them. Claiming Northbridge is taking the piss, though.
|
|
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"? I don't think anyone in Bankstown would call Macarthur their local team. People in this area would most likely be split between Sydney FC and Western Sydney Wanderers.
|
|
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"? Bankstown was considered to be part of south west Sydney when I lived there in the 50's, 60's and 70"s.
|
|
|
|
|
Ange
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 24,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking. Is Bankstown part of the "local footballing community"?
|
|
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xKryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory. Wanderers don’t have “a territory” .... that’s Frank Lowy thinking.
Clubs thinking they have “a territory” is a barrier to pro/rel - we have to eliminate that type of thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAbsolutely amazing that they fail to mention Northbridge FC and their takeover.... I mean Alliance, with them. Supporting South West Sydney, methinks NOT! The Northbridge FC deal was announced in a separate media release on Monday. https://www.macarthurfc.com.au/news/macarthur-fc-announce-partnership-northbridge-fc-npl-season
|
|
|
|
|
Ange
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 24,
Visits: 0
|
Absolutely amazing that they fail to mention Northbridge FC and their takeover.... I mean Alliance, with them. Supporting South West Sydney, methinks NOT!
|
|
|
|
|
Paul01
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Kryslovic the f***wit at work muscling in on Wanderers territory.
|
|
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
"Macarthur FC is proud announce an exciting new partnership with local NPL clubs Camden Tigers and Bankstown United. The partnership further strengthens Macarthur FC’s already strong relationship with the local grassroot footballing community. As part of the agreement, both local clubs will benefit from further coaching and development clinics to be held in both Camden and Bankstown LGA’s. Further to this, both Camden Tigers and Bankstown United will assist Macarthur FC in grassroot talent identification of up and promising youngsters. Today’s announcement sees the culmination of many months of hard work behind the scenes with all parties."
https://www.macarthurfc.com.au/news/macarthur-fc-cements-local-grassroots-football-local-npl-partnership?fbclid=IwAR1kV5B7kddqoWy28W5MNnBq-MfJjv1kA4CqYLx4p3zTDXXrRSIxhYepejY
|
|
|
|
|
Paul01
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe competition will not grow without finding a way to reduce ticket prices to increase demand.
Why would Macarthur FC need higher prices anyway when it is meant to have the best stadium deal in the competition? Something really doesn’t add up there. Macarthur has to pay its license fee off although it has been agreed that it can be paid over a longer period. They are getting a lower distribution than they were expecting and sponsorship is not as available as it was when they did their budgeting. That would be right from the fraud of an administrator Sam Kryslovic.
|
|
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe competition will not grow without finding a way to reduce ticket prices to increase demand.
Why would Macarthur FC need higher prices anyway when it is meant to have the best stadium deal in the competition? Something really doesn’t add up there. Macarthur has to pay its license fee off although it has been agreed that it can be paid over a longer period. They are getting a lower distribution than they were expecting and sponsorship is not as available as it was when they did their budgeting.
|
|
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe competition will not grow without finding a way to reduce ticket prices to increase demand.
Why would Macarthur FC need higher prices anyway when it is meant to have the best stadium deal in the competition? Something really doesn’t add up there. It really does make you wonder why a new club with the cheapest stadium deal is trying to do their best to piss off and keep away both members of the club, and opposition fans from attending.
|
|
|
|
|
Heart_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 0
|
The competition will not grow without finding a way to reduce ticket prices to increase demand.
Why would Macarthur FC need higher prices anyway when it is meant to have the best stadium deal in the competition? Something really doesn’t add up there.
|
|
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMacarthur still charging $40 for an active area seat, this is still following having moved it to the side near the corner flag as well. Additionally to make things even worse, charging the $40 fee for away fans. Absolutely disgraceful, this is where other clubs/new a league independent management/football Australia should step in and prevent things like this. Was planning on definitely heading down to see Macarthur away, but if these prices remain, im gonna happily kiss that trip goodbye. On pay tv my friend. It costs more than an NRL match,,,in Campbelltown!
|
|
|
|
|
elksy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 300,
Visits: 0
|
Macarthur still charging $40 for an active area seat, this is still following having moved it to the side near the corner flag as well.
Additionally to make things even worse, charging the $40 fee for away fans. Absolutely disgraceful, this is where other clubs/new a league independent management/football Australia should step in and prevent things like this.
Was planning on definitely heading down to see Macarthur away, but if these prices remain, im gonna happily kiss that trip goodbye.
|
|
|
|
|
heyitsrobbie1984
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 160,
Visits: 0
|
Macarthur FC just notched another win in a trial game against Adelaide United. score was 3-1
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xNo sure if this has been mentioned. Macarthur relocated the active area from behind the goal to near the corner flag on the side of the pitch. A position in which away fans would usually sit. They have additionally patterned the name 'Macarthur Bull Pen'. On top of this they initially and still are charging a minimal of $440 for the season for the active area. Now sitting in Bronze seating. Macarthur FC have killed there own active support before it was even born. Dreadful management from the club. They dropped membership in the active bay to $335. I can't wait for the headline "Bullpen sick of all the Bullshit"
|
|
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xNo sure if this has been mentioned. Macarthur relocated the active area from behind the goal to near the corner flag on the side of the pitch. A position in which away fans would usually sit. They have additionally patterned the name 'Macarthur Bull Pen'. On top of this they initially and still are charging a minimal of $440 for the season for the active area. Now sitting in Bronze seating. Macarthur FC have killed there own active support before it was even born. Dreadful management from the club. They dropped membership in the active bay to $335.
|
|
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Should be a cracking match, its dissapointing how greedy the ownership is though. They'd onsell their mothers for a marketable price, the bottomfeeding management.
|
|
|
|
|
deluka
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 651,
Visits: 0
|
As a neutral, I'm really f*cking excited for the opening match against WSW
|
|
|
|