World Politics/Global Events


World Politics/Global Events

Author
Message
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
SING WHEN YOU'RE WHALING! YOU ONLY SING WHEN YOU'RE WHALING!!
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
Whales abundant, Australia 'politicising science', Japan tells The Hague

Date
July 3, 2013 - 1:49PM
9 reading nowRead later

Andrew Darby
Hobart correspondent
Japan has rejected Australia's legal attack over whaling as an alarmist crusade against a scientific research program Tokyo has the right to conduct.

Launching its defence against Australia's bid to halt the whaling at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Japan's counsel claimed the case was mistaken.

"The days of civilising missions and moral crusades are over," lawyer Payam Akhavan said.

"In a world with diverse civilisations and traditions, international law cannot become an instrument for imposing the cultural preference of some at the expense of others."

Advertisement
Professor Akhavan on Tuesday said Japan stood unfairly accused of 30 years of defiance and deception, but Australia's position was based on a belief "that whales are unique, sacred, charismatic mammals that should never be killed".

"It seeks to apply the [International] Whaling Convention as if it was the anti-whaling convention," Professor Akhavan told the court.

"Since 1979 Australia has pursued an express policy of using the IWC, against its stated purpose, to ban all whaling. It has politicised science in order to impose Australian values on Japan in disregard of international law."

He said Antarctic minke whales were abundant in the Southern Ocean, not endangered.

"This stands in stark contrast to the alarmist assertions of impending catastrophe in Australia's pleadings," he said.

Australia last week argued Japan's 26 year Antarctic whaling program, which has killed more than 10,000 whales, disguised commercial whaling in the "lab coat" of science.

Japan's deputy foreign affairs minister, Koji Tsuruoka, told the court Tokyo was conducting a "comprehensive scientific research program" whose aim was to demonstrate that commercial whaling could be sustainable.

"The lifting of the [1982] moratorium requires that convincing scientific data be presented," Mr Tsuruoka said.

The deputy foreign minister argued Japan had long lived in harmony with nature and it would be the last country to misuse marine resources.

"Japan is conducting a comprehensive scientific research program because it wishes to resume commercial whaling, based on science, in a sustainable manner," Mr Tsuruoka said.

"Australia can't impose its will on other nations nor change the International Whaling Commission into an organisation opposed to whaling," he said.

Japan also mounted an argument disputing the court's ability to hear the matter, which it said took place in Antarctic waters claimed by Australia, and potentially outside ICJ jurisdiction.

The case is continuing.

with AAP, Reuters

Follow the National Times on Twitter

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/whales-abundant-australia-politicising-science-japan-tells-the-hague-20130703-2pbba.html#ixzz2XyLFB6JW
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0

New hopes for HIV cure
Date
July 3, 2013 - 6:30PM

Julia Medew
Health Editor
View more articles from Julia Medew

Two American men appear to have overcome HIV, boosting hopes they will join a handful of people believed to have been cured of the virus and that a wider cure can be found.

Doctors from the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston announced on Wednesday night that two previously HIV-positive patients no longer had detectable virus levels in their blood or tissue after having bone marrow stem-cell transplants to treat cancer between two and four years ago.

Remarkably, the two men – a young man and another in middle age – have also remained clear of the virus after stopping anti-retroviral therapy eight and 15 weeks ago. When most HIV-positive people stop taking treatment, the virus becomes active again within four to eight weeks.


Dr Daniel Kuritzkes talks to the media in Kuala Lumpur. Photo: International AIDS Society/Steve Forrest/Workers' Photos
The Boston pair look set to join a Mississippi toddler believed to have been cured of HIV by intense treatment 30 hours after birth and Timothy Ray Brown, the "Berlin patient" famously cured of HIV six years ago after having a similar bone marrow transplant to treat cancer in Germany.

However, there is a key difference between the Berlin and Boston patients that could advance research towards a cure for HIV. Mr Brown received a transplant from a donor with an unusual gene mutation that resists HIV whereas the Boston patients received transplants from donors with no known resistance to the disease.

Timothy Henrich and Daniel Kuritzkes, the doctors managing the Boston patients, told an HIV conference in Malaysia that this suggested the process of stem-cell transplantation was responsible for their suspected remission.

In particular, they believe a common complication of transplantation, graft-versus-host disease, could be at play because it involves newly transplanted donor cells attacking the transplant recipient's body.

The doctors said although it was too early to say whether their patients had been cured permanently, repeated tests of large volumes of cells, plasma and tissue had found no sign of the virus.

"We demonstrated at least a 1000 to 10,000-fold reduction in the size of the HIV reservoir in the peripheral blood of these two patients, but the virus could still be present in other tissues such as the brain or gastrointestinal tract," Dr Henrich told the International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention in Kuala Lumpur.

He said the patients were being closely monitored because the virus could reappear at any moment.

While the doctors have been inundated with requests for the procedure since they announced earlier results from the patients last year, they said it was not suitable for people whose virus was well controlled by treatment and who are otherwise healthy.

This was because bone marrow transplantation kills up to 20 per cent of people within the first few years. It is also expensive and patients may need long-term immunosuppressive medications to minimise donor cells attacking their own tissues.

Sharon Lewin, an HIV researcher and director of infectious diseases at Melbourne's Alfred hospital, said although the cases created hope that a cure was possible, more patients needed to be studied in similar circumstances to see if the mechanisms could be understood and assist ongoing research into a more universal and practical cure.

"There is a lot of excitement among patients, but we don't want to raise expectations too high. We're at the very beginning of nutting the science out," said Professor Lewin, who also works at the Burnet Institute.

Last year, American doctors announced that a Mississippi baby had been cured of HIV after receiving unusually large doses of conventional treatment started 30 hours after birth. When the baby was taken off treatment at 18 months, HIV could not be detected in the child's blood or tissue. The toddler is still free of the virus today.

French researchers also believe early treatment may lead to a functional cure where patients still have HIV but do not need treatment. In a widely publicised trial, 14 French patients who received treatment earlier than usual in the course of their infection have been living comfortably without treatment for a median of seven and a half years. They are now considered "post-treatment controllers" of HIV. It is unclear if they remain infectious or not.

The French researchers estimate that as many as 15 per cent of people who start treatment early and continue for at least a year might be able to control the virus without treatment thereafter, relieving them of a lifelong daily drug regimen.

While research into a cure for HIV, which affects about 34 million people, is gaining momentum, most doctors and scientists are reluctant to predict how long it could take to find a universal cure.

However, University of California professor of medicine Steven Deeks told the conference he was hoping for a cure within 20 years.

"We're essentially where we were in the '80s with anti-retroviral drugs and we know what happened after that," he said, referring to the treatment that transformed HIV from a fatal illness into a manageable chronic disease in the 1990s.



Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/world/new-hopes-for-hiv-cure-20130703-2pbr0.html#ixzz2XyF0yI6X

Edited by Joffa: 3/7/2013 06:56:02 PM
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
433 wrote:
Can't you read blue text Joffa?

Sarcastic or not, I think the racial epithet was the issue.
433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
Can't you read blue text Joffa?
Glory Recruit
Glory Recruit
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Wow...thousands of people die...but one catholic priest is the real news item here.


](*,) ](*,)
433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Wow...thousands of people die...but one catholic priest is the real news item here.


Edit: that type of commentary is not acceptable under any circumstances, ET or not a repeat will result in a ban.

Edited by Joffa: 2/7/2013 09:30:30 PM
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Wow...thousands of people die...but one catholic priest is the real news item here.
lukerobinho
lukerobinho
Legend
Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
Vatican confirms Catholic priest was killed in Syria

Quote:
A Syrian Roman Catholic priest was killed in northern Syria last month, the Vatican has confirmed.

A statement said the circumstances of Father Francois Murad's death were "not fully understood", but that it happened on 23 June in the convent of the Custody of the Holy Land in Ghassaniya.

The Franciscan took refuge there after the monastery of St Simon was bombed.

Some initial reports said Fr Murad was beheaded by jihadist militants, but activists now say that he was shot.

The beheading claims were based on a video posted online at around the same time that appears to show two prisoners being executed by rebels.

The video's title referred to the killing of a priest and a bishop, but none of the victims can be identified and none of those featured in the video refer to such an event.

After analysing the footage, local activists and Human Rights Watch said it was most likely filmed in a different location several months before Fr Murad was killed.

Instead, he "died when he was shot inside his church" in Ghassaniya, three separate local sources told the Daily Telegraph newspaper.

The Custody of the Holy Land, a Franciscan order which is the official custodian of religious sites in the Middle East, had also issued a statement two days after Fr Murad's death saying Islamists shot him.

"Islamists attacked the monastery, ransacking it and destroying everything," it said. "When Father Francois tried to resist, defending the nuns, rebels shot him."


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23138679#TWEET808260
lukerobinho
lukerobinho
Legend
Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
The boy killed for an off-hand remark about God - Sharia spreads in Syria

Quote:
The murder of a boy accused of blasphemy has come to symbolise concerns about the power of Islamist radicals in Syria's armed uprising. Paul Wood reports from Aleppo on how Sharia is spreading in rebel-held areas.

Mohammed Qataa's mother wanders the streets of Aleppo looking into strangers' faces as she tries to find her son's killers.

She knows she would recognise them. She was looking right at them when, in front of a dumbstruck and terrified crowd, Mohammed was shot dead, accused of blasphemy.

She remembers Mohammed as a happy, dutiful son, well known and well-liked in the Shaar neighbourhood where the men of the family scrape a living with a coffee cart.

He was 14 years old, but with no schooling possible because of the war he was usually to be found on the busy main thoroughfare through Shaar, selling the thick, sweet coffee they prefer here.

One day last month, someone asked him for a free cup. "Not even if the Prophet himself returns," he had replied, laughing. That remark was a death sentence.


Mohammed Qataa, 14, was condemned for a joke he made when asked for a free cup of coffee
It was overheard by three armed men. They dragged him to a car and took him away. Half-an-hour later, a badly beaten Mohammed was dumped back in the road by his cart.

The men, showing no fear that anyone would question what they were doing, summoned a crowd with shouts of "Oh People of Aleppo. Oh people of Shaar." Their bellows alerted Mohammed's mother.

Recalling what happened next, she buries her face in her hands and weeps.

"One of them shouted: 'Whoever insults the Prophet will be killed according to Sharia'," she told me.

"I ran down barefoot to the streets. I heard the first shot. I fell to the ground when I got there.

"One of them shot him again and kicked him. He shot him for a third time and stamped on him.

"I said: 'Why are you killing him? He's still a child!' The man shouted: 'He is not a Muslim - leave!'"

'Capital offence'
After the murder on 10 June, pictures of Mohammed's body went viral on Facebook and Twitter in Arabic.

He had been shot in the face, a hole where his nose and mouth should have been.

There was an outcry. It was claimed that the killers were from the main group linked to al-Qaeda here, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Suspicion also fell on the Nusra Front, the biggest Islamist organisation in the uprising.

Both issued statements condemning the murder, as did almost all of Aleppo's rebel brigades, and the city's main Sharia court.


"It is not necessary to throw religion into every corner of your life. This is killing our revolution.”

Manal Barish
Secular activist, Saraqeb
We met a judge there, a 26-year-old Islamic scholar barely out of university, with a wispy beard and round glasses.

He told me the men were regime militia, "shabiha", trying to ferment trouble between jihadis and other fighters.

I found that explanation rather convenient, along with the disavowals of the murder by the two Islamist groups linked to al-Qaeda.

Would regime thugs really have risked entering the heart of opposition-held Aleppo to abduct a boy - and then have returned half-an-hour later to kill him in the street?

The family say the evidence is confusing. The men spoke the classical Arabic of the Koran, yet made simple mistakes. They made the odd statement that blaspheming against God could be forgiven but insulting the Prophet was a capital offence.

The four looked like jihadis but stopped to buy a packet of sunflower seeds. People explained that the truly pious would not eat sunflower seeds because they take so long to shell - and the Prophet said not to waste time.

But though the family don't know - or are too afraid to say - which armed group is to blame for Mohammed's death, they maintain that the rebel authorities bear ultimate responsibility.

"We have no freedom left," says Mohammed's older brother, Fouad.

"We had it when the rebels first took over in Aleppo but now we have nothing. What we have instead are countless [Sharia] committees, each following its own interpretation of religion."

Public flogging
Aleppo's main Sharia court has taken pains to stress that though Mohammed Qataa's murderers said they were acting in the name of Islam, the killing was un-Islamic, a criminal act.

But whatever the killers' real motives - whether a brutal trick by the regime or a cruel and extreme interpretation of Islam by jihadis - it is also true that Sharia is spreading in rebel-held parts of Syria.

A documentary team from BBC Arabic went to the northern town of Saraqeb to follow the work of the Sharia court there, gaining extraordinary access over a period of six weeks.

The court is run by a 27-year-old former preacher, Sheikh Abdullah Mohammed Ali, who hands out sentences dressed in Afghan-style shalwar kameez, a Kalashnikov at his side.

Four men convicted of trying to steal a taxi driver's car are brought before him. Although admitting their guilt, they claim to be members of a rebel brigade.

Sheikh Abdullah tells them their weapons will be confiscated and they will not be allowed to be part of any armed group in future.

He swiftly decides that the sentence will be a public flogging. The men are driven to the centre of Saraqeb for sentence to be carried out. The instrument of punishment is an electrical cable.

Sheikh Abdullah takes a megaphone to address a small crowd that has gathered.

"In the name of God," he says, reading out the names of the four prisoners standing in a row. "Fifty lashes for the leader of the gang. Forty for each of his men."

He declares: "God's law is the best protection for the weak."

The first of the prisoners is forced to his knees, a man on either side of him holding his arms. When it starts some of the crowd chant, "The Prophet is our leader". Others just count the lashes.

Afterwards, Sheikh Abdullah explains to the documentary crew that the punishment was actually quite lenient. They had been convicted of highway robbery. The normal penalty for that is death, he says.

"In wartime, punishments according to Sharia are suspended until peace returns," he says.

"Now, we are at war. We must concentrate on fighting the regime's army. Full punishments will be enforced as soon as the regime falls and an Islamic State is declared."

'Alternative to chaos'
The uprising's rural, conservative and religious supporters approve of Sharia's harsh penalties.

So too, perhaps, do many of those afraid of the criminal anarchy, the looting, killing, kidnapping and theft, that has become an everyday fact of life in rebel-held areas.

But many in Saraqeb are dismayed by the rise of the Islamists. There have been small street protests in the town against Sharia.

"We did not hope for what we have come to today," said Lyas Kadouni, an activist interviewed by BBC Arabic.

"The names of [rebel] brigades tell you how people think now - names like 'Lovers of the Prophet Brigade' and so on. It is not necessary to throw religion into every corner of your life. This is killing our revolution."

Painfully earnest, Lyas Kadouni wants to tidy up Saraqeb's streets. "The most important thing is to practise the duties of citizenship," he says.

"We have to show… we have an alternative to chaos."

He says he is "100% certain they [foreign jihadis] will disappear". It could take a month, two, or three months, he says.

But the influence of relatively secular activists like Lyas Kadouni, always marginal, is waning still further.

Almost two years after peaceful protest became a civil war, they are still painting murals and handing out leaflets. Others, meanwhile, are taking power at the point of a gun.

Revenge
Things are not going entirely the Islamists' way, however. They have split and split again over the question of whether to unify with al-Qaeda. There is also a bitter ongoing battle with elements of the Free Syrian Army.

While most fighting on the rebel side are Muslim, many of those do not want a religious state.

The commander of one such unit told me the Islamist Nusra Front had sent a suicide bomber to one of his positions, killing a dozen of his men. Then his brother was kidnapped by the jihadis. After paying a ransom of tens of thousands of dollar to get his brother back, he would now seek revenge.

"There will be nowhere for them to hide."

Even as government forces sweep into previously opposition-held towns, the rebels are fighting amongst themselves, hardline jihadis against the relatively secular FSA, a civil war within the civil war.

The battle, though sporadic, seems just as bitter as that against the regime.

Its outcome will determine what kind of state Syria will become if the rebels win. In the meantime, though, Sharia justice is the only kind available in many parts of Syria.

Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
Japan opens world court defense of whaling

July 2, 2013 - 7:32PM

Japan is opening its defence of the country's controversial whaling program in the seas around Antarctica during hearings at the United Nations' highest court.

Based on their written pleadings, lawyers for Tokyo are expected to argue Tuesday that the International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to hear the dispute with Australia and New Zealand over the annual hunt and slaughter of hundreds of minke and fin whales in the Southern Ocean.

Japan also will argue that its whaling is for scientific research and therefore permitted under the 1946 convention that regulates whaling.

Lawyers for Australia told the court last week that the whaling is a commercial hunt dressed up as science and should be stopped.

The 16-judge world court will take months to issue a judgment.

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/japan-opens-world-court-defense-of-whaling-20130702-2p889.html
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
433 wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
433 wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Iridium1010 wrote:
Big news Egyptian military just gave Morsi a 48 hour ultimatum to meet demands of protesters.

What the fuck is wrong with Egypt? Riot, kick out the old guy, democratically elect a new guy, riot again.
They didn't want an Islamo-fascist dictatorship and got one.


Don't vote for him then :roll:


This! They voted for him FFS!


He's part of a party known as the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. What did people expect? :lol:

I honestly don't know how that could be misconstrued.
433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
433 wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Iridium1010 wrote:
Big news Egyptian military just gave Morsi a 48 hour ultimatum to meet demands of protesters.

What the fuck is wrong with Egypt? Riot, kick out the old guy, democratically elect a new guy, riot again.
They didn't want an Islamo-fascist dictatorship and got one.


Don't vote for him then :roll:


This! They voted for him FFS!


He's part of a party known as the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. What did people expect? :lol:
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
433 wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Iridium1010 wrote:
Big news Egyptian military just gave Morsi a 48 hour ultimatum to meet demands of protesters.

What the fuck is wrong with Egypt? Riot, kick out the old guy, democratically elect a new guy, riot again.
They didn't want an Islamo-fascist dictatorship and got one.


Don't vote for him then :roll:


This! They voted for him FFS!
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
lukerobinho wrote:
The real war on women



Islamophobia in the guise of women's activism is an interesting phenomenon.
lukerobinho
lukerobinho
Legend
Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
The real war on women


Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
Iridium1010 wrote:
Morsi has refused the armies ultimatum.

Now watch the bloodshed ensue.

WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

Glory Recruit
Glory Recruit
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
433 wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Iridium1010 wrote:
Big news Egyptian military just gave Morsi a 48 hour ultimatum to meet demands of protesters.

What the fuck is wrong with Egypt? Riot, kick out the old guy, democratically elect a new guy, riot again.
They didn't want an Islamo-fascist dictatorship and got one.


Don't vote for him then :roll:



I don't think they expected him to make a minister of someone who was linked to the group who killed 60 tourists in Luxor.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/19/egypt-tourism-minister-resigns-luxor-hisham-zaazou

Morsi has refused the armies ultimatum.
433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
thupercoach wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Iridium1010 wrote:
Big news Egyptian military just gave Morsi a 48 hour ultimatum to meet demands of protesters.

What the fuck is wrong with Egypt? Riot, kick out the old guy, democratically elect a new guy, riot again.
They didn't want an Islamo-fascist dictatorship and got one.


Don't vote for him then :roll:


Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
Five men rape journalist, 22, in Tahrir Square: reports

July 2, 2013 - 11:58AM

A Dutch journalist has been raped by a group of five men in Cairo's central Tahrir Square as millions of protesters take to the streets to demand the removal of President Mohammed Mursi, according to reports.

The woman is believed to have undergone surgery for horrific injuries sustained in the attack, as a volunteer vigilante group formed to protect women in Tahrir Square reported a new wave of sexual violence by groups of men targeting women.

Operation Anti-Sexual Harassment said it had recorded 44 cases of sexual assaults and harassment against women on Sunday night alone, the highest number it had encountered since the group was formed in November 2012.

"Among the reported cases tonight are grandmothers; mothers with their children; 7yr olds. Common denominator: all female," @OpAntiSH tweeted.

The group urged women to "please stay away from tahrir until we can [take] control over it".

Dina Zakaria, an Egyptian journalist reporting for the "Egypt 25" news channel, reported that a Dutch journalist in Tahrir Square "was raped by men who dub themselves revolutionists".

"Her condition is severe and she is hospitalised," Zakaria wrote on her Facebook page.

The Dutch Embassy in Cairo issued a statement saying a 22-year-old Dutch woman was attacked in Tahrir Square on Friday night.

"The Netherlands Embassy has assisted the victim, and after receiving emergency treatment in a Cairo hospital she was repatriated to the Netherlands in the company of family," the statement said.

"The victim has cooperated with an investigation started by the Egyptian authorities. In the interest of the privacy of the victim no further information will be given."

A state hospital in Cairo issued a statement saying the journalist was admitted after being raped by five men, according to Ynetnews, the website of the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot.

Talaat Abdallah, Egypt's Prosecutor General, reportedly sent his staff to the hospital to find out what happened in the attack, YNewsNet reported.

Some reports suggest the woman was an intern with an Egyptian organisation and had gone to Tahrir Square to take photos of the demonstrations.

Jeremy Bowen, the BBC's Middle East editor, tweeted on Monday that another woman had taken shelter in their building from a gang of men trying to sexually assault her.

"Sadly #tahrir revolutionary atmosphere of people behaving well with common purpose long gone. Sexual assault common. no cops In sight," he tweeted.

It follows the sexual assault of other female journalists covering Egypt's protests in recent years, including French television journalist Sonia Dridi and Lara Logan, a correspondent for US network CBS.

Logan was sexually assaulted and beaten in Tahrir Square in 2011, and later said she believed she was going to die.

After being rescued, Logan returned to the US and was treated in a hospital for four days.

"Sexual violence is a way of denying women journalists access to the story in Egypt," Logan told the New York Daily News following her assault.

"It's not accidental. It's by design."

British journalist Natasha Smith of the Fair Observer also reported being sexually assaulted by a mob near Tahrir Square.

Although sexual harassment is not new to Egypt, suspicions abound that many of the recent attacks are organised by opponents of various protests in a bid to drive people away.

Amnesty International said in a report last year that such attacks appeared to be designed to intimidate women and prevent them from fully participating in public life.

The news of the attack came as the Egyptian army issued a 48-hour deadline for the deadly clashes to be resolved.

So far eight people have been killed and hundreds injured in the protests, which coincide with the first anniversary of President Mursi's inauguration.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/five-men-rape-journalist-22-in-tahrir-square-reports-20130702-2p8sk.html#ixzz2Xqq2tKgg
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Iridium1010 wrote:
Big news Egyptian military just gave Morsi a 48 hour ultimatum to meet demands of protesters.

What the fuck is wrong with Egypt? Riot, kick out the old guy, democratically elect a new guy, riot again.
They didn't want an Islamo-fascist dictatorship and got one.
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Iridium1010 wrote:
Big news Egyptian military just gave Morsi a 48 hour ultimatum to meet demands of protesters.

What the fuck is wrong with Egypt? Riot, kick out the old guy, democratically elect a new guy, riot again.
Glory Recruit
Glory Recruit
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
Big news Egyptian military just gave Morsi a 48 hour ultimatum to meet demands of protesters.
Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
Joffa, what are you doing? Joffa, stahp!

WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0

Uzbekistan, Australia discuss prospects of cooperation

inShare


1 July 2013, 16:37 (GMT+05:00)

The delegation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Australia headed by Ambassador William Fischer and representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Uzbekistan discussed topical issues of international and regional affairs on Monday, the Foreign Ministry of Uzbekistan said.
During the meeting, the sides exchanged views on further expanding cooperation in various specific areas of mutual interest.
Despite the geographical distance, Uzbekistan and Australia have expressed mutual interest in deepening cooperation all-around, particularly with regards to trade, the economy and investment.
Uzbekistan is interested in bringing modern Australian practices and technologies to its agricultural sector, as well as energy saving technology, equipment production as well as projects within the Navoi Free Industrial-Trade Zone (FITZ).
Currently, there are ten enterprises backed by Australian capital in Uzbekistan, including three enterprises fully owned by Australian capital that work in agriculture, mediation, perfumes, cosmetics and textiles.
Representative offices of Rio Tinto and the Worley Parsons company's engineering center were opened in Uzbekistan in 2011.
Do you have any feedback? Contact our journalist at agency@trend.az

http://en.trend.az/regions/casia/uzbekistan/2166438.html?
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
Number of rough sleepers rises again in London

Annual figures show 6,437 people were seen spending night on streets in 2012-13, up 13%, despite mayor's pledge

Patrick Butler, social policy editor
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 20 June 2013 21.54 AEST

The number of homeless people recorded as spending a night on the streets of London has risen again, confirming that the mayor, Boris Johnson, has missed his ambitious target to end rough sleeping in the capital by the end of 2012.

The latest annual figures show that 6,437 people were seen rough sleeping in 2012-13, compared with 5,768 the previous year, a 13% rise year on year and an increase of 62% since 2010-11.

Homelessness charities said the problem was likely to get worse as a result of cuts to welfare and local authority budgets, and called on Johnson to take action.

Leslie Morphy, chief executive of the charity Crisis, said: "The mayor of London pledged to eliminate rough sleeping in the capital by 2012. Instead we see today the number of people sleeping on London's streets – in absolute destitution in one of the world's richest cities – has more than doubled on Boris's watch."

However, the statistics contained some positive news, revealing that a greater proportion of those recorded as rough sleepers were spending no more than one night out before being found accommodation or being returned to their home area by street outreach teams under the government's No Second Night Out initiative.

Three-quarters of rough sleepers were recorded as not sleeping out again after their first night, compared with 70% the previous year.

Johnson pledged during his mayoral election campaigns in 2008 and 2012 to end rough sleeping in London and to ensure that by the end of 2012 no one would spend a second night on the streets.

The figures collected by the Broadway charity and the Greater London Authority show:

• Just over half of rough sleepers (53%) were non-UK nationals. Of these, 28% were from central and eastern European member states of the EU.

• Nine per cent of people seen sleeping rough were over 55 years old, and six people aged under 18 were contacted by outreach teams.

• Among UK nationals, 3% of rough sleepers (145 people) were known to have served in the armed forces.

Howard Sinclair, the chief executive of Broadway, said: "While any increase in the number of rough sleepers in London is concerning, there is much work being done to support those in need. This is reflected in the fact that three-quarters of new rough sleepers were only seen sleeping rough once and figures show that a small number of people were contacted in all four quarters of 2012/13.

"However, while we acknowledge and welcome the significant investment made in services for rough sleepers in London, and the positive impact of that investment, we are clear that we need to maintain a similar investment level in preventative services so as to stop people arriving on the streets in the first place. Yet this is the area which has experienced dramatically reduced funding over the past two years."

Darren Johnson, a Green party London Assembly member, said: "The mayor has helped more people off the streets, but he has failed to tackle the reasons why they end up there in the first place. The mayor has supported cuts to our welfare safety net, overlooked damaging cuts to homelessness services and opposed reforms to our insecure private rented sector. If he doesn't change course, his aim of ending rough sleeping will remain a distant dream."

The figures do not include homeless people who are squatting or "sofa surfing" on friend's couches. London has the highest proportion of recorded rough sleeping of any area in England.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jun/20/homeless-rough-sleepers-rise-london?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
thupercoach wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
They're keeping him alive purely because he's Nelson Mandela.
In your medical opinion?

He's a 94 year old man with a lung infection, his survival rate was put at below 20% BEFORE he was put on life support.
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
They're keeping him alive purely because he's Nelson Mandela.
In your medical opinion?

Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
Ethiopia’s Plan to Dam the Nile Has Egyot fuming

The heat is stifling but the construction workers and red-hatted engineers don’t let up. Mechanised excavators batter into the mighty, arid peaks on either side of the site of Ethiopia’s Grand Renaissance dam, set to be the largest in Africa. The foundations are growing. The dark brown waters of the Nile River flow through the site. But the punishing sun and tough terrain aren’t the only challenges facing the dam’s progress. Downstream, Egypt is furious – and some politicians there have talked in private of war. Ethiopia is defiant. “There is nothing that will stop Ethiopia now from realising our country’s dream,” says Bereket Simon, an Ethiopian government spokesman, as he walked around the site on a recent morning.

The Ethiopian government believes that the dam, which is due to start generating electricity next year and will be paid for from the proceeds of government bond sales, will become an image of national pride and a symbol of the country’s recent development. Egypt, a country whose identity and economy are already inseparable from the Nile, feels deeply threatened by the project. Egypt’s President Mohammed Morsi said in a speech in Cairo on June 10, “We will defend each drop of the Nile with our blood,” but he has also said that dialogue is the best means of solving the crisis. Not all of Egypt’s politicians have been so diplomatic; during a cabinet meeting on June 3, which was being broadcast by Egyptian state TV without the knowledge of the political figures attending, several told Morsi that he must destroy the dam through any means available.

On June 18 tempers seemed to calm a little when the Ethiopian foreign minister met his Egyptian counterpart in Addis Ababa, afterwards saying relations remained “brotherly” and that the two men had agreed to conduct further studies to ascertain the likely future impact of the dam on all countries through which the river flows. But the specter of a regional conflict remains. In February, Saudi Arabia’s deputy defense minister was harshly critical of the dam project. “The Dam is being built close to the Sudanese border for political plotting rather than for economic gain and constitutes a threat to Egyptian and Sudanese national security,” said Prince Khaled bin Sultan, the deputy minister. “Ethiopia is hell-bent on harming Arab peoples.” (Bin Sultan was dismissed by the Saudi king in April; it is unclear whether there is any connection between his dismissal and his comments about the dam). On Ethiopia’s side, both South Sudan and Uganda recently said Egypt should not undermine Ethiopia’s right to the Nile.

The challenge Ethiopia faces is to persuade not just the Egyptian government but a whole nation that appears convinced right now that Ethiopia is about to plug the Nile. There is no geographical feature of Egypt more important to its people. As the Greek historian, Herodotus, put it in 50 B.C., Egypt is the “gift of the Nile.” Extremely arid and lacking in rainfall, Egypt has always relied heavily on the Nile for its freshwater. Following Sudan’s independence, Egypt negotiated with Sudan in 1959 that it would have rights to over 14,500 billion gallons per year of the Nile’s flow, leaving over 488 billion gallons for Sudan, and less for the upstream states – Ethiopia, Uganda, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania and Burundi. Ethiopia was not party to these talks, and many Egyptians now see the new dam as a way for Ethiopia to bypass the agreement, control the Nile, and gain leverage over Cairo. For Ethiopia and Egypt, whose populations are predicted to grow steeply in the coming years, the water of the Nile and how they use it could determine whether they can cater for the demands of their fast growing populations.

Experts differ on whether the dam will, in fact, negatively impact the Nile. According to Dia El-Quosy, the former chairman of Egypt’s National Water Research Centre, the dam will reduce water flow anywhere from 1,300 billion gallons to 6,600 billion gallons per year. El-Quosy also argues that the reduction in water flow would increase pollution in the river and harm the fisheries in Egpyt, as well as making it difficult for ferries and other boats to navigate the river. Another serious concern, el-Quosy says, is the possible reduction in fertility for farmland along the banks of the river that could be caused by the dam holding back nutrient-rich salts. He claims that every 260 billion gallon reduction in water flow created by the dam will mean half a million farmers lose their farms. “So if we lose 30bn kilolitres (8,000 billion gallons) in water flow, that would mean losing 25% of Egypt’s cultivated land,” he says.

Not all experts, though, agree that the dam necessarily spells disaster for the downstream states of Sudan and Egypt. According to Professor Dale Whittington, an expert on the Nile’s hydropower potential, hydropower dams do not generally consume water. “After the reservoir behind the Grand Renaissance Dam is filled, the dam will not reduce the total water supply available to Egypt and Sudan,” he says. Whittington also says, however, that Ethiopia needs to recognise that Egypt has legitimate concerns about how Ethiopia will operate the Grand Renaissance Dam. If Ethiopia attempted to fill the dam’s reservoir during years of drought and at a time when there was little water stored in Egypt’s Aswan High Dam Reservoir, for example, this would seriously reduce Egypt’s water supplies at a crucial time. “Similarly, during a multi-year drought in the Nile basin, Egypt needs guarantees that Ethiopia will not act strategically to withhold water, but instead will coordinate the operation of the Grand Renaissance Dam with Egypt’s Aswan High Dam in order to minimize the costs of the drought on all the” countries through which the Nile flows, said Whittington.

Although the Egyptian government has been highly vocal in its opposition to the dam, Sudan appears to support the project. “Our government is mostly positive about the dam,” says Alhajj Hamad, a Khartoum-based political analyst. “There is a small minority of Islamists who feel they should back their Islamist brothers in Cairo but mostly our government is being pragmatic and sees the benefits.” Experts have noted that the dam could reduce sediment flows down the Nile, which would increase the lifespan of hydropower dams in Sudan, of which there are six, mostly built during colonial times. It would also reduce the fertility of Sudan’s farmlands, however. “No one is sure quite yet,” said one Sudanese water official. Although Egypt also has two dams on the Nile, which could coordinate with Ethiopia’s dam to efficiently regulate water flow, it is the size of Ethiopia’s dam that is irking Egypt – and the perceived secrecy by which the dam is being built.

In spite of the uncertainty surrounding the dam project – and its potential to create friction in the region – it could ultimately turn out to bring greater harmony to the countries through which the Nile flows. “If transparency is increased then this dam can be a great opportunity for the region to work together,” says Cleo Paskal, a specialist in water and food security at London’s Chatham House think tank. “Ethiopia will now be a stakeholder of the Nile and it will be in all the countries’ interests to increase dialogue and to protect the river in a way that benefits all.”

Read more: http://world.time.com/2013/06/28/ethiopias-plan-to-dam-the-nile-has-egypt-fuming/#ixzz2XV2qGJQB
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
Germany can keep Eichmann records secret, court rules

Attempt to prove West Germany knew the senior Nazi was in Argentina in the 1950s frustrated by ruling

guardian.co.uk, Friday 28 June 2013 15.12 AEST

Germany's foreign intelligence agency can keep secret some of its records on Adolf Eichmann, the Nazi known as the architect of the Holocaust, a court ruled on Thursday.

The federal administrative court ruled that the intelligence agency was within its rights to black out passages from the files sought by a journalist attempting to shed light on whether West German authorities knew in the 1950s where Eichmann had fled after the second world war.

Thursday's ruling followed a decision last year in which the court said the Federal Intelligence Service had to release some files it had previously kept secret.

Israeli agents abducted Eichmann in Buenos Aires in 1960 and brought him to Jerusalem for trial. Eichmann, who helped organise the extermination of Europe's Jews as the head of the Gestapo's Jewish affairs office during the war, was found guilty of war crimes, sentenced to death and hanged in 1962.

The mass-circulation Bild daily, whose reporter sued for the files' full release, has reported that West German intelligence knew as early as 1952 that he was in Argentina.

In 2006, the CIA released documents showing that it wrote to its West German counterpart in 1958, saying it had information that Eichmann "is reported to have lived in Argentina under the alias 'Clemens' since 1952". Eichmann's alias was Ricardo Klement.

The German intelligence service said in an emailed reaction to the ruling that most of the files it held on Eichmann were already public and only a small portion still needed to be blacked out. It said the need to do so stemmed from laws on "protecting state security interests" and on data protection.

A lawyer for Bild's publisher, Axel Springer, said after Thursday's ruling that it reserved the right to take the case to Germany's highest court. Christoph Partsch said in a statement that Germany's interests would be harmed by redacting the files, not by releasing them.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/28/germany-eichmann-holocaust-records-secret?

Edited by Joffa: 28/6/2013 06:47:10 PM
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search