rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Mcjules still bitter that he was exposed as a bitter fool with an irrational hatred of religion willing to shit on principles of justice in order to take down a high ranking Catholic, with not one fuck given as to the truth of the matter.
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMcjules still bitter that he was exposed as a bitter fool with an irrational hatred of religion willing to shit on principles of justice in order to take down a high ranking Catholic, with not one fuck given as to the truth of the matter. If I'm accept willing to accept the High Court decision with Pell I think you need to accept that it's highly likely Pell attempted to cover up or ignore allegations of sexual abuse by others in the church. You like to paint this all this as some evil leftist plot to destroy the pillar of western culture that the Catholic Church. But news flash Rusty: This is nothing new.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x[quote]Mcjules still bitter that he was exposed as a bitter fool with an irrational hatred of religion willing to shit on principles of justice in order to take down a high ranking Catholic, with not one fuck given as to the truth of the matter. If I'm accept willing to accept the High Court decision with Pell I think you need to accept that it's highly likely Pell attempted to cover up or ignore allegations of sexual abuse by others in the church. Or maybe you just need to accept you have a prejudice against the man which has affected your ability to analyse the facts and make sound judgements.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
https://theshovel.com.au/2020/05/07/andrew-bolt-george-pell-expected-to-know-that-paedophilia-inappropriate/Andrew Bolt furiously penning think piece about how George Pell couldn’t possibly be expected to know that paedophilia was inappropriateBy The Shovel on May 7, 2020News Corp columnist Andrew Bolt was today putting the finishing touches to an opinion piece which will argue that people as busy and important as George Pell can’t possibly be expected to know the finer details of every single law and regulation.Following the Royal Commission’s finding that George Pell knew about sexual abuse in the church but didn’t report it, Bolt began furiously penning a think piece for tomorrow’s papers. An early draft of the piece supposedly read:“He was busy. He had an important job. He had a church to run. How can he possibly have been expected to be across every rule and regulation? Every fashionable opinion and point of view? How was he to know whether the legal age of consent was six or sixteen? He’s a Cardinal, not a lawyer.But here again we have yet another example of the liberal left claiming that George Pell – one of the most important men of the Catholic Church – should not be attending to his duties, but rather swotting up on the minutia of government legislation, as if he’s some kind of professor of law.‘This is illegal, this is not. You can have sex with this person, but you can’t have sex with that person.’ And on it goes. Please. It’s not his place to become an expert in the finer points of Australian law.Even if he had known that sexually assaulting children was some sort of breach of protocol, does that mean he was obliged to report it? Do you report every transgression of the law you see? Every jaywalker, every cyclist without a helmet? Of course not.Let’s call this what it is – an un-Christian attack on a Christian man”.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xhttps://theshovel.com.au/2020/05/07/andrew-bolt-george-pell-expected-to-know-that-paedophilia-inappropriate/Andrew Bolt furiously penning think piece about how George Pell couldn’t possibly be expected to know that paedophilia was inappropriateBy The Shovel on May 7, 2020News Corp columnist Andrew Bolt was today putting the finishing touches to an opinion piece which will argue that people as busy and important as George Pell can’t possibly be expected to know the finer details of every single law and regulation.Following the Royal Commission’s finding that George Pell knew about sexual abuse in the church but didn’t report it, Bolt began furiously penning a think piece for tomorrow’s papers. An early draft of the piece supposedly read:“He was busy. He had an important job. He had a church to run. How can he possibly have been expected to be across every rule and regulation? Every fashionable opinion and point of view? How was he to know whether the legal age of consent was six or sixteen? He’s a Cardinal, not a lawyer.But here again we have yet another example of the liberal left claiming that George Pell – one of the most important men of the Catholic Church – should not be attending to his duties, but rather swotting up on the minutia of government legislation, as if he’s some kind of professor of law.‘This is illegal, this is not. You can have sex with this person, but you can’t have sex with that person.’ And on it goes. Please. It’s not his place to become an expert in the finer points of Australian law.Even if he had known that sexually assaulting children was some sort of breach of protocol, does that mean he was obliged to report it? Do you report every transgression of the law you see? Every jaywalker, every cyclist without a helmet? Of course not.Let’s call this what it is – an un-Christian attack on a Christian man”. Nailed most of the talking points. Sadly, it missed the opportunity to suggest every single school, government and church "could have done more" and therefore are just as guilty as Pell. Oh and the good things he did, like set up a fund for compensation where far more money was spent on trying not to pay victims than what ended up getting paid to them.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
I guess when you lose the legal battle there’s always poorly written attempts at satire to fall back on.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
You and Pell have a lot in common rusty. -PB
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYou and Pell have a lot in common rusty. -PB Pretty sure Pell doesn't hate women.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYou and Pell have a lot in common rusty. -PB Pretty sure Pell doesn't hate women. So says the guy who hates non football female and disabled athletes and doesnt think they are entitled to equal pay. A true bigot you are.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xYou and Pell have a lot in common rusty. -PB Pretty sure Pell doesn't hate women. So says the guy who hates non football female and disabled athletes and doesnt think they are entitled to equal pay. A true bigot you are. Never said they weren't Rus. No need to project.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xYou and Pell have a lot in common rusty. -PB Pretty sure Pell doesn't hate women. So says the guy who hates non football female and disabled athletes and doesnt think they are entitled to equal pay. A true bigot you are. Never said they weren't Rus. No need to project. Its clear from your views that you’re a non football misogynist and abliest. One doesnt have specifically state something in order for the meaning to be implied. No need to hide your bigotry behind weasel words.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xYou and Pell have a lot in common rusty. -PB Pretty sure Pell doesn't hate women. So says the guy who hates non football female and disabled athletes and doesnt think they are entitled to equal pay. A true bigot you are. Never said they weren't Rus. No need to project. Its clear from your views that you’re a non football misogynist and abliest. One doesnt have specifically state something in order for the meaning to be implied. No need to hide your bigotry behind weasel words. Surely the longest bow ever drawn on 442. But if you want to play that stupid game. Based on your vehement defence of Pell you're evidently a child molester. I mean one doesn't have to specifically state something for the meaning to be implied. No need to hide your perversions behind weasel words.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xYou and Pell have a lot in common rusty. -PB Pretty sure Pell doesn't hate women. So says the guy who hates non football female and disabled athletes and doesnt think they are entitled to equal pay. A true bigot you are. Never said they weren't Rus. No need to project. Its clear from your views that you’re a non football misogynist and abliest. One doesnt have specifically state something in order for the meaning to be implied. No need to hide your bigotry behind weasel words. Surely the longest bow ever drawn on 442. But if you want to play that stupid game. Based on your vehement defence of Pell you're evidently a child molester. I mean one doesn't have to specifically state something for the meaning to be implied. No need to hide your perversions behind weasel words. I suppose that would make all 7 judges on the High Court molesters too. In fact anyone who disagrees with you about anything is a child molester. And a racist, misogynistic, homophobe. Name calling is for intelligent , enlightened people like yourself.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Why are most here not accepting the judgement of the High Court?
Just accept his innocence and be grateful that an innocent man is free.
|
|
|