Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xGA doesn’t have much quality to work with his starting XI. Greek Super League SPL Bundesliga 2 Serie B Japanese second division Serbian Superliga A-League which hasn’t even started Apart from Hrustic, there’s not much playing well consistently at a top level. With due respect, this is sounding like the archetypal criticism of players being rated on their international performances, because of where they play their club football. Despite pleasing technical prowess, Hrustic has relatively poor vision, insight and game sense. He also thinks too slowly. His decision-making is mediocre for an international footballer. He is one of the worst Aussie players in terms of visualising the pitch around him before he receives the ball. I suppose even trained pundits can't say this publicly, or they don't recognise Hrustic's major flaw.
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
I particularly liked Leckie, when in front of goal receiving a peach of a cross, trying to control a ball from the right with his right foot instead of (a) blasting it first time with his left or (b) taking a touch with his left to set up a shot with his right. My mum has a better touch than Leckie.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Footballking55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI think if Duke is on the field, you probably do put more crosses into the box, but all the crosses were from such terrible positions, it was Holger-esque football. The one that actually came from a good position gets headed in. We looked like we tried playing through the middle a bit more in the second half and not just swinging in aimless crosses but also it felt like very sterile dominance as playmaker mentioned above. We actually were good in our transitions and looked dangerous at times when the Chinese made mistakes but just could not finish. I’m at the end of my tether with Leckie, he makes decent runs but he just cannot finish. Given how many goals he bangs in locally, I understand why people think Maclaren should be selected, but he does absolutely nothing at international level, he just isn’t up to it. Especially if when he comes on we go back to swinging in aimless crosses. Grant and Behich were disappointing for me, bad crossing positions and bad crosses themselves. Is it part of the orders from Arnold to get crosses in from anywhere or are the wingers just not really creating space for them to run into deeper positions? We see Grant get right into the box for Sydney generally. I thought Jeggo/Irvine/Sainsbury/Degenek were fairly quiet (besides the handball and the blow up at the end) but maybe this is a good thing in a defensive sense at least, they just got the ball moving. Hrustic was trying things but I thought he had some sloppy moments too, that’s even accounting for expecting your #10 to have lower pass completion stats Ryan was solid enough. Subs didn’t really do anything of note I thought, Maclarens a sense was notable though, and I thought Karacic was lazy in defence when he came on and his crossing wasn’t any better than Grants.
I was going to comment on player selection in general before the game. Arnold has talked for quite a while about building depth, but what’s the point if you aren’t going to use it? Granted that if we make the World Cup, players will have to be used to playing multiple games in a short space, but also I think when we have a relatively evenly balanced squad talent wise, we can afford to be smart about it e.g. Irvine and Behich were particularly singled out for playing badly in the last match day but they were 2 who probably get through the most running, and also both played almost 180 min across the two legs. You’d expect your CBs to play 180, but if we have players of equal/almost equal talent sitting on the bench, why not use them (and give them the exp)? Grant can play 90 in one match, Karacic 90 in another. Same for Behich/Elder, same for Irvine/Mooy, Hrustic/Rogic (for example anyway). Of course there are other factors of play too, picking the right group of players that complement each other’s strengths, picking players in form and with minutes, maybe some players are on a confidence streak and taking advantage of that etc. I’m sure there’s more thinking that goes into it than we are made aware of as fans, but we can only comment on what’s in front of us, and it has been disappointing.
The only positives I can think of are that the next internationals are not as far away as they would usually be (Jan instead of March) so don’t have 4 months of stewing over these mediocre results, and that next time around we’ll hopefully see players back in form, or at least with more minutes under their belt. Based on the game happening now, Japan 1 Oman 0, looks like we are going to have to win every game from here on out if we want auto qualification The problems with Arnie's subs is that they couldn't make any impact in the game or even made it worse. got it in One! At least leaving Duke on the pitch the crossers had someone to aim at. Maclaren was anonymous. And we have run out of energy by the 85th minute in both the past two games. Suggests the playing set up isn't quite right.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
I've read some good data from Ante Jukic's articles on ESPN.
Australia crosses the ball into the box, more than most other Asian teams. We don't tend to break down stacked defences , in central attacking interplay as much as we should.
A lot of teams are succeeding in attacking Australia in their Attacking Transitions and our Defensive Transitions, in accelerated attacks. As we rely on our full backs playing high and wide to create attacking width, or at least one of them to play high and wide in an overlapping role, the moment we lose the ball we are vulnerable to counter attacks in our Defensive Transition.
Some fans claim these FBs are caught out of position. They are not. It is the job of others in central midfield to cover them.
*We need to improved in our central attacking interplay in confined spaces with one/twos and better dribbling quality to create numerical advantage and increase scoring opportunities.
*Also, dummy diagonal and hooked runs, can drag defences out of position.
*Moving the ball more quickly also helps break down stacked central defences. Our over reliance on aerial crosses, and not having aerial supremos like Kennedy and Cahill as central strikers, has negated our main attacking strategy .
Another issue is that Leckie in particular, isn't anticipating crosses on the ground/ potential goal assists quickly enough. He is frequently a metre or two behind where he should be to anticipate the final ball in the box to convert. His more game sense proficient teammates, endowed with greater insight, would like him to be closer to the ball in passes/crosses to convert. Like Hrustic, ML thinks too slowly, and lacks game sense, but probably in a different way. Moreover, Leckie's technique and first touch lets lets him down to convert the chances he gets.
Sadly for Australia, a greater number of Asian defences are becoming more cohesive and more compact. It is reducing scoring chances. In the 2018 Asian WCQing campaign, creating the chances wasn't as much of a problem as converting them. they are also working gout or how too counter our over-reliance on crosses into the box.
Notwithstanding all of the aforementioned, we were right on top at the 70 min mark and should have won last night's game. Excellent cross from Boyle and conversion from Duke.
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x[quote]GA doesn’t have much quality to work with his starting XI. Greek Super League SPL Bundesliga 2 Serie B Japanese second division Serbian Superliga A-League which hasn’t even started Apart from Hrustic, there’s not much playing well consistently at a top level. With due respect, this is sounding like the archetypal criticism of players being rated on their international performances, because of where they play their club football. Level of club football is a pretty good indicator of player quality. It's also a problem of minimal playing time, so it's a double whammy.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI particularly liked Leckie, when in front of goal receiving a peach of a cross, trying to control a ball from the right with his right foot instead of (a) blasting it first time with his left or (b) taking a touch with his left to set up a shot with his right. My mum has a better touch than Leckie. I'm not sure if you wrote or quoted first sentence, Muz? Nevertheless, the axiom is shooting first time with the nearest foot to the cross ( Left side of the pitch cross, received and first time shot with Left Foot, or, Right side of pitch cross, received and first time shot with Right Foot), or, receiving with the furthest foot and shooting with the nearest foot in a two touch shooting action. These practices create better body shape and efficacy in shooting.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
remove rogic/mooy from the midfield and it seems to have a lot of trouble breaking down a defence
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
The only data worth looking at is 1-1 against china.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x[quote]GA doesn’t have much quality to work with his starting XI. Greek Super League SPL Bundesliga 2 Serie B Japanese second division Serbian Superliga A-League which hasn’t even started Apart from Hrustic, there’s not much playing well consistently at a top level. With due respect, this is sounding like the archetypal criticism of players being rated on their international performances, because of where they play their club football. Level of club football is a pretty good indicator of player quality. It's also a problem of minimal playing time, so it's a double whammy. It isn't always. Scott McDonald played better as a club player in Scotland than as an international Socceroo. Matt McKay and Jade North were better international players than club. At the Russian World Cup in 2018 Milligan, Risdon and Arzani held their own against France, the World Champs, despite playing A L. Little playing time at high level club is an issue.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xHow many points did we have at this stage during the last qualification period for Russia? 10 So we have more points now under Arnie than we did under Ange? Ty. This point was elucidated last night. It is a very fair comment. The worrying thing is that Saudi look a lot better than the Saudi team in the last 2018 WCQ campaign. a key point, other NT's keep improving yet we and imo no matter the current and last coach arn't really.....as much as many here think we have players capable today. We still don't have a regular scoring forward or even a midfielder who strikes the net enough. So we've improved technically but not scoring aganst stronger NT's. Kudos to Duke, I feel he's strong 9 who puts in throws his body on the line BUT our distribution to the box was woeful most times at this level. So were on top through many phase's of play and can't deliver enough for one of our players to meet the ball and force a save let alone on target. This is not coachs fault imo but the onus is on the players, conviction/want. For all the blame GA keeps getting the onus is on the players on the pitch period. Why as a player your performance so different yet similar to last weeks SA game. We were far more physical last night yet week before at home we weren't. I prefer more physicality for it puts pressure on the opponent every single time forcing errors to capitilise on. Our press is quite lame for I expect GA hasn't the confidence in the squad to cover a counter but the players need to run their own game as well, you know when you have the upper hand or not on the pitch. Dukes injection for his top goal is the most convicted action from the last 2 games when in attack. Where is the rest of it ? who lines themselves up for a decent shot from out the box let alone in the box. (you can count the lame shots last 2 games) The standard of cross's was woeful (whim and prayer stuff) let alone the corners, I see more consistancy at NPL and importantly getting a corner ball to the back. Thats not tactics but terrible execution at this level. The players are pretty toothless in the big picture, GA can talk tactics (be it right or wrong to many here) under the sun to his players and select the wrong ones BUT a player also needs to make his own mind up during his game at that split second I'm going hard and I'm going for it........thats what turns alot of games around. Hardly anyone does, we lack a consistant leader - who's barking on the park to his fellow players, I don't see alot of emotion. Maybe thats all we've got as some have mentioned whilst the other NT's have improved. Many here maybe don't want to accept our ambition far out weighs our talent. Oh were meant to beat China for we routed them 3zip last time, no it doesn't work that way always. They picked up their game obviously after the pen, when are we gonna see that from our own no matter Behich and others should be off and such and such on.
Love Football
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe only data worth looking at is 1-1 against china. Have not seen an Ante Jukic write up on this match, but I've seen previous game write ups. Data and patterns of play are useful in formulating game plans. The better Asian teams are devising them successfully against us.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xHow many points did we have at this stage during the last qualification period for Russia? 10 So we have more points now under Arnie than we did under Ange? Ty. This point was elucidated last night. It is a very fair comment. The worrying thing is that Saudi look a lot better than the Saudi team in the last 2018 WCQ campaign. a key point, other NT's keep improving yet we and imo no matter the current and last coach arn't really.....as much as many here think we have players capable today. We still don't have a regular scoring forward or even a midfielder who strikes the net enough. So we've improved technically but not scoring aganst stronger NT's. Kudos to Duke, I feel he's strong 9 who puts in throws his body on the line BUT our distribution to the box was woeful most times at this level. So were on top through many phase's of play and can't deliver enough for one of our players to meet the ball and force a save let alone on target. This is not coachs fault imo but the onus is on the players, conviction/want. For all the blame GA keeps getting the onus is on the players on the pitch period. Why as a player your performance so different yet similar to last weeks SA game. We were far more physical last night yet week before at home we weren't. I prefer more physicality for it puts pressure on the opponent every single time forcing errors to capitilise on. Our press is quite lame for I expect GA hasn't the confidence in the squad to cover a counter but the players need to run their own game as well, you know when you have the upper hand or not on the pitch. Dukes injection for his top goal is the most convicted action from the last 2 games when in attack. Where is the rest of it ? who lines themselves up for a decent shot from out the box let alone in the box. (you can count the lame shots last 2 games) The standard of cross's was woeful (whim and prayer stuff) let alone the corners, I see more consistancy at NPL and importantly getting a corner ball to the back. Thats not tactics but terrible execution at this level. The players are pretty toothless in the big picture, GA can talk tactics (be it right or wrong to many here) under the sun to his players and select the wrong ones BUT a player also needs to make his own mind up during his game at that split second I'm going hard and I'm going for it........thats what turns alot of games around. Hardly anyone does, we lack a consistant leader - who's barking on the park to his fellow players, I don't see alot of emotion. Maybe thats all we've got as some have mentioned whilst the other NT's have improved. Many here maybe don't want to accept our ambition far out weighs our talent. Oh were meant to beat China for we routed them 3zip last time, no it doesn't work that way always. They picked up their game obviously after the pen, when are we gonna see that from our own no matter Behich and others should be off and such and such on. A lot of good points made here, LFC. It would take a thesis to respond to all of them though! One moot point you raise is the improving organisation and structure of our opponents. I attended a coaching course in about 2013. There was concern from Football Aus ( FFA then) Tech Dept about how as Asian teams improved these qualities, we would struggle to beat them.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xremove rogic/mooy from the midfield and it seems to have a lot of trouble breaking down a defence They have been missed.
|
|
|
JayEss
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Gonna have to try qualify the hard way again, if we can even nab third spot. Been a weird phase of qualifying, I missed the match this morning but generally I don't think we've been that bad.
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
REPOST from the ArnieOut thread:
Well that was completely un-expectable, not only we didnt beat a poor China side off a VAR pen but we didnt look like scoring apart from putting 1000 crosses that we put in and 1 worked off which came in the first half.
Let's be honest apart from the lack player quality which we known, we have a manager who at this is tactically inept at this level its clear the teams have now worked us out in how ArnieBall is played and we dropping points but also our performance are regressing which is deeply more worrying. Its not like Arnie could select Ninkovic, Adrian Majeweski, Bobo and Holosko he has to use Australian passport players instead!
I think Football Australia have to a make a big call here, do they back him in and hopefully we get there somehow or do they pull the trigger and sack him and appoint a new manager and give him a remit of not only qualifying for the World Cup but also given him enough time to prepare for a new team?
Personally I know I would do but we are in a delicate spot with Oman behind us for that 3rd spot as well so they have to a decision pretty soon given our next game is in January.
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xHow many points did we have at this stage during the last qualification period for Russia? 10 So we have more points now under Arnie than we did under Ange? Ty. This point was elucidated last night. It is a very fair comment. The worrying thing is that Saudi look a lot better than the Saudi team in the last 2018 WCQ campaign. a key point, other NT's keep improving yet we and imo no matter the current and last coach arn't really.....as much as many here think we have players capable today. We still don't have a regular scoring forward or even a midfielder who strikes the net enough. So we've improved technically but not scoring aganst stronger NT's. Kudos to Duke, I feel he's strong 9 who puts in throws his body on the line BUT our distribution to the box was woeful most times at this level. So were on top through many phase's of play and can't deliver enough for one of our players to meet the ball and force a save let alone on target. This is not coachs fault imo but the onus is on the players, conviction/want. For all the blame GA keeps getting the onus is on the players on the pitch period. Why as a player your performance so different yet similar to last weeks SA game. We were far more physical last night yet week before at home we weren't. I prefer more physicality for it puts pressure on the opponent every single time forcing errors to capitilise on. Our press is quite lame for I expect GA hasn't the confidence in the squad to cover a counter but the players need to run their own game as well, you know when you have the upper hand or not on the pitch. Dukes injection for his top goal is the most convicted action from the last 2 games when in attack. Where is the rest of it ? who lines themselves up for a decent shot from out the box let alone in the box. (you can count the lame shots last 2 games) The standard of cross's was woeful (whim and prayer stuff) let alone the corners, I see more consistancy at NPL and importantly getting a corner ball to the back. Thats not tactics but terrible execution at this level. The players are pretty toothless in the big picture, GA can talk tactics (be it right or wrong to many here) under the sun to his players and select the wrong ones BUT a player also needs to make his own mind up during his game at that split second I'm going hard and I'm going for it........thats what turns alot of games around. Hardly anyone does, we lack a consistant leader - who's barking on the park to his fellow players, I don't see alot of emotion. Maybe thats all we've got as some have mentioned whilst the other NT's have improved. Many here maybe don't want to accept our ambition far out weighs our talent. Oh were meant to beat China for we routed them 3zip last time, no it doesn't work that way always. They picked up their game obviously after the pen, when are we gonna see that from our own no matter Behich and others should be off and such and such on. A lot of good points made here, LFC. It would take a thesis to respond to all of them though! One moot point you raise is the improving organisation and structure of our opponents. I attended a coaching course in about 2013. There was concern from Football Aus ( FFA then) Tech Dept about how as Asian teams improved these qualities, we would struggle to beat them. And little done within our backyard which is more worrying for us Decentric. Good to see you are back.
|
|
|
Footballking55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Somewhere I heard that Arnie is one of the most expensive managers in International Football. If this is correct, we are certainly not getting value for money. Can anyone corroborate this?
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xHow many points did we have at this stage during the last qualification period for Russia? 10 So we have more points now under Arnie than we did under Ange? Ty. This point was elucidated last night. It is a very fair comment. The worrying thing is that Saudi look a lot better than the Saudi team in the last 2018 WCQ campaign. a key point, other NT's keep improving yet we and imo no matter the current and last coach arn't really.....as much as many here think we have players capable today. We still don't have a regular scoring forward or even a midfielder who strikes the net enough. So we've improved technically but not scoring aganst stronger NT's. Kudos to Duke, I feel he's strong 9 who puts in throws his body on the line BUT our distribution to the box was woeful most times at this level. So were on top through many phase's of play and can't deliver enough for one of our players to meet the ball and force a save let alone on target. This is not coachs fault imo but the onus is on the players, conviction/want. For all the blame GA keeps getting the onus is on the players on the pitch period. Why as a player your performance so different yet similar to last weeks SA game. We were far more physical last night yet week before at home we weren't. I prefer more physicality for it puts pressure on the opponent every single time forcing errors to capitilise on. Our press is quite lame for I expect GA hasn't the confidence in the squad to cover a counter but the players need to run their own game as well, you know when you have the upper hand or not on the pitch. Dukes injection for his top goal is the most convicted action from the last 2 games when in attack. Where is the rest of it ? who lines themselves up for a decent shot from out the box let alone in the box. (you can count the lame shots last 2 games) The standard of cross's was woeful (whim and prayer stuff) let alone the corners, I see more consistancy at NPL and importantly getting a corner ball to the back. Thats not tactics but terrible execution at this level. The players are pretty toothless in the big picture, GA can talk tactics (be it right or wrong to many here) under the sun to his players and select the wrong ones BUT a player also needs to make his own mind up during his game at that split second I'm going hard and I'm going for it........thats what turns alot of games around. Hardly anyone does, we lack a consistant leader - who's barking on the park to his fellow players, I don't see alot of emotion. Maybe thats all we've got as some have mentioned whilst the other NT's have improved. Many here maybe don't want to accept our ambition far out weighs our talent. Oh were meant to beat China for we routed them 3zip last time, no it doesn't work that way always. They picked up their game obviously after the pen, when are we gonna see that from our own no matter Behich and others should be off and such and such on. Its true its looked liked we have regressed with our players but its more worrying that our performances have regressed which is more alarming. FA have to make a big call to whether to stick by Arnie and hope we make it make a coach change which might change our course towards Qatar 2022. But good points mate!
|
|
|
SoccerooFan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xGA doesn’t have much quality to work with his starting XI. Greek Super League SPL Bundesliga 2 Serie B Japanese second division Serbian Superliga A-League which hasn’t even started Apart from Hrustic, there’s not much playing well consistently at a top level. With due respect, this is sounding like the archetypal criticism of players being rated on their international performances, because of where they play their club football. Despite pleasing technical prowess, Hrustic has relatively poor vision, insight and game sense. He also thinks too slowly. His decision-making is mediocre for an international footballer. He is one of the worst Aussie players in terms of visualising the pitch around him before he receives the ball. I suppose even trained pundits can't say this publicly, or they don't recognise Hrustic's major flaw. OMG what a load of crap this is!!!
|
|
|
jas88
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
really should have thrown the kitchen sink at Carlos Queiroz when he was available. Knows the region very well, a very very experienced coach.
|
|
|
camberwelldorjes
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 203,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xGA doesn’t have much quality to work with his starting XI. Greek Super League SPL Bundesliga 2 Serie B Japanese second division Serbian Superliga A-League which hasn’t even started Apart from Hrustic, there’s not much playing well consistently at a top level. With due respect, this is sounding like the archetypal criticism of players being rated on their international performances, because of where they play their club football. Despite pleasing technical prowess, Hrustic has relatively poor vision, insight and game sense. He also thinks too slowly. His decision-making is mediocre for an international footballer. He is one of the worst Aussie players in terms of visualising the pitch around him before he receives the ball. I suppose even trained pundits can't say this publicly, or they don't recognise Hrustic's major flaw. It’s pretty obvious where your starting XI play their club football is a pretty good indicator of the quality of the squad.
There is a good reason why Irvine, Jeggo, Behich, Duke, Degenek, Grant, Boyle have never played in an elite European league. Even Sainsbury has just started to play regular football in the Eredivisie.
|
|
|
Balin Trev
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Proud2BeCanberran
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
https://ultra.zone/2022-FIFA-World-Cup-qualification-AFC-Third-Round#group=bThis thing gets a little more nervy now... Gonna need to get I'd say 10 points from the last 4 games. Or hope Japan drop points to one of Vietnam or China...
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Watched last 20min. Curious about the subs.
Well intended Behich pass to Maclaren deflected. The following minutes saw Maclaren move a lot and be stalked by his marker. Space existed but everyone seemed to ignore him.
Hrustic with some space but instead of poking it forward to Boyle he stops and it's knocked out for a throw.
Corner headed away to Grant who puts in a shocking low cross while McGree smartly runs diagonally free where he'd have time to put it across goal. That would've been very interesting to see.
Decent cross by Mabil headed out for corner. Ensuing corner just lofty and keeper fouled.
Nice long pass by Sainsbury down to Karacic with a cross to 3 of our men but Behich heads it downward into defender.
Karacic with another decent enough cross. Gets to Maclaren's feet but two defenders smothering him sees the ball fall away. I wonder what could've happened had someone been standing on the dome. Ensuing play sees long cross caught by keeper with no one going for it.
Next diagonal ball lands at Ruka's feet where he touches it down then Irvine and Behich both hesitate to get it and an opponent kicks it away. If Irvine puts it flat to Ruka, there's plenty of space to put it across goal with Maclaren surely running into the 5 yard box and Karacic was lingering far and unmarked.
Nice dribble in tight spot by Karacic who puts McGree down the line. Time to cross but passes it back to Irvine who floats it in for a block. While McGree had the ball Maclaren positioned himself well between 3 men and Ruka had one CB very concerned.
By no means are there 100% chances but the situations presented themselves to be used to see something more become of it. Skill level aside there's not enough greed. Too much hesitation. Many Asian teams can't hit the target much but they at least try the direct approach and the ball will do funny things. We play like the Arsenal of old who want to walk the ball into the net.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBy no means are there 100% chances but the situations presented themselves to be used to see something more become of it. Skill level aside there's not enough greed. Too much hesitation. Many Asian teams can't hit the target much but they at least try the direct approach and the ball will do funny things. We play like the Arsenal of old who want to walk the ball into the net. In fairness, they also used to rely on brilliant 1 vs 1 runs by Thierry Henry. For the Gunners, it wasn't only team goals. Actually, I think they had the balance right between team and individual. But they definitely had the personnel capable of outmaneouvring any opponent so that they could walk the ball into the net. Vieira, Pires, Ljungberg, Bergkamp, Henry...
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Utterly woeful
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x[quote]GA doesn’t have much quality to work with his starting XI. Greek Super League SPL Bundesliga 2 Serie B Japanese second division Serbian Superliga A-League which hasn’t even started Apart from Hrustic, there’s not much playing well consistently at a top level. With due respect, this is sounding like the archetypal criticism of players being rated on their international performances, because of where they play their club football. Level of club football is a pretty good indicator of player quality. It's also a problem of minimal playing time, so it's a double whammy. It isn't always. Scott McDonald played better as a club player in Scotland than as an international Socceroo. Matt McKay and Jade North were better international players than club. At the Russian World Cup in 2018 Milligan, Risdon and Arzani held their own against France, the World Champs, despite playing A L. Little playing time at high level club is an issue. Decentric, you like data and statistics don't you? Sample size is critically-important to data and statistics. You're using a sample size of one match to prop up your argument. To make any kind of meaningful inference, you need a lot more matches where those guys have performed as well as world class players (leaving aside the fact that Milligan, Risdon and Arzani lost that match). The event needs to happen again and again and again and again. While I agree with you that clubs can undervalue footballers (e.g. a certain French central midfielder), there are extremely compelling reasons why European football clubs pay $x million for the French guys but why they wouldn't (or won't) sign Milligan, Risdon and Arzani. And that reason is the consistency with which those French players compete at a world class level. I'm sorry but none of our guys have consistently demonstrated the ability of those players.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Northern Ireland drew with Italy a few days ago. The Northern Ireland players held their own against the European champions.
Does that mean that Whyte, Davis or Flanagan are, overall, at the same level as Jorginho, Chiesa and Bonucci?
No, of course not. Upsets happen. If you get Italy and Northern Ireland to face each other in 30 matches, you'll almost certainly find that the Italian players are streets ahead. And that's why their market value is far higher than the market value of the Northern Irish players (overwhelmingly).
The same if you consider any world class team and Australia.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
In fairness, one of the world's richest clubs did sign Arzani. But obviously his relationship with Man City is different to that of someone such as Bernardo Silva, for example.
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBy no means are there 100% chances but the situations presented themselves to be used to see something more become of it. Skill level aside there's not enough greed. Too much hesitation. Many Asian teams can't hit the target much but they at least try the direct approach and the ball will do funny things. We play like the Arsenal of old who want to walk the ball into the net. In fairness, they also used to rely on brilliant 1 vs 1 runs by Thierry Henry. For the Gunners, it wasn't only team goals. Actually, I think they had the balance right between team and individual. But they definitely had the personnel capable of outmaneouvring any opponent so that they could walk the ball into the net. Vieira, Pires, Ljungberg, Bergkamp, Henry... Oh no I'm referring to Arsenal of about 10 years ago that were incredibly painful for their fans. Your list were a brilliant side.
|
|
|