Not sure who you hang out with but life is pretty much as normal at my work place or social circles. People a bit cautious before xmas but other than that it's fiestaaaaaaaaaaa

Yeah people that use covid as an excuse not to socialise are the ones that always did find an excuse I reckon.

They just find it easier to have a ready made excuse now so maybe it's actually EASING their anxiety aha

I'd love to see that just for the hilarious confused furore

yeah, seeing that too. 

bloody oath....what a pickle for them. They can't really object when they've been saying for the last two years it's just a cold right?

The above is how a mocker slanders people who've chosen to be vaccine-free. And inspite of what I say below, you'll still keep mocking people with the above, because it's the easiest way for you to demonise the minority by twisting the facts. You know you are misrepresenting the vaccine-free, but something inside your soul both enjoys keeping up the misrepresentation, which is the worst kind - when you know it is wrong, but keep doing it.

Here are a different set of reasons:

See this data for today from the U.S. VAERS database:



Here's the W.H.O. VigiAccess database:



These are historically high damage figures for the Covid vaccines, compared to all other vaccines over half a century. To some doctors, this is horrific. But the Media has convinced the masses it is no big deal.

People think that just because you didn't suffer side effects immediately, you're ok.

The following are some reason why some people choose not to take the Covid vaccines:

1) Covid vaccines, even if no immediate side effects, damage your natural immune system

2) Damage to your immune system means, to keep fighting Covid, you'll be on boosters for the rest of your life.

3) Life-long boosters may seem no big deal, since people get flu-shots every year. But see the VigiAccess damage-rate of flu shots compared to Covid shots. You think there's no difference? The difference is in the mechanism of Covid MRNA vaccines, which are world's away from how conventional vaccines have functioned for hundreds of years.

4) Damaged immune systems put people at greater risk of other diseases

5) Australian Bureau of Statistics shows that chance of dying from Covid, for people aged below 59, is 0.1% for males and 0.004% for females. For aged 60-69, risk of dying is 1.7% for males, 1.1% for females. Compare that to risk of damaged immune system leading to higher risk of other diseases.

6) Divergence of U.K. Media saying more UN-vaccinated deaths and hospitalisations, versus U.K. Government website data showing more Vaccinated deaths and hospitalisation. Indicating U.K. Media are lying. Chances are, Australian Media doing the same.

7) Initial promises of vaccines in early 2021 -- lower transmission, lower infection - both did not happen. Now, reliant on boosters. And booster timeframe now shortened. All indicating vaccines far less effective than originally marketed to the compliant public.

8) Compared to 0.1% chance of dying according to Australian Bureau of Statistics, this compares to seeing videos of people permanently damaged for their entire life, e.g. pro-vax Casey Hodgkinson from Auckland, https://www.bitchute.com/video/2yaS1z45hJik/ Given the odds of 0.1% chance of dying versus such side effects, people should have the choice which risk to take.

9) Some people, with certain underlying conditions, are said to be at greater risk of such side effects, according to Dr. Peter McCullough.

10) Peer-reviewed clinical studies at https://ivmmeta.com/ indicating 68% effectiveness of Ivermectin, with minimal side effects compared to Covid vaccines (see above WHO VigiAccess chart).

11) Doctors who have, each one, successfully treated many thousands of Covid patients, and they all consistently recommend Vitamin C, D, Zinc, Quercetin, and, if you can get your hands on some, Ivermectin.

This above is an example of how a thinking man makes a personal decision whether to take the Covid vaccine, whereas -- you ignore the above - and think that the vaccine-free skipped the vax because (a) Covid is not real and (b) they think they're not at risk.

The sign that outwardly you're one of the in-crowd, but inwardly, when you look in the mirror, you see a fool, is that, when you are told the above, you continue to mock the minority by saying (a) the unvaxed think Covid is not real and (b) the un-vaxed think they're not at risk.

No, it's not that they think they're at no risk. Instead, it is a careful weighing up of risks from both sides, and coming to a personal decision. If you want the jab, in spite of the above, go ahead. But don't mock and force others to take the jab, which is not protecting you.

If your final argument is that, even if the vaxes do not stop transmission and infection, at least the vaxes stop severe Covid, then see with your own eyes the U.K. Government data, and contrast that with what the Media tells you:



Bottom line, this is what the vaxers believe:

1 - government doctors can never make mistakes

2 - governments never make mistakes

3 - the Media never lies. And even if the Media does lie, vaxers believe the Media is 100% telling the truth about Covid vaccines.

4 - the majority is never wrong. Throughout history, the majority is never wrong.

5 - That when Pharma companies are faced with a choice of (a) an effective out-of-patent medicine with minimal profit because of lack of patent protection, versus (b) a patented medicine with lower effectiveness, but higher profits --- the vaxers believe Pharma will always choose to market the more effective medicine, even if it means zero profit.

That, my friend, is your paradigm. Deep in your soul, you believe all the above 5 points. You believe them so much, that it fuels the forcefulness of your mocking against those who've chosen not to be vaxed.

yep

its mainly anti-vaxers who avoid socialising because they think we're going to shed Bill Gates nanobots on them

they made their choice to isolate themselves from society and be social misfits, which they probably already were before the pandemic

they sound exactly like JohnSmith

+2. My group of family and friends are just being careful with masks in high traffic areas, etc but its pretty much a normal Christmas now. You don't wear a mask when having a meal/drinks...

Would be interesting to see the mental gymnastics involved.

Haven't really been reading johnsmiths posts but when I scroll through, I keep on seeing the table with green circles. Is he stuck in a loop?

something about the media, big pharma, Bill Gates microchips, lizard people and 5G

The moronic variant will see the c19 burn out by Easter

People have been infected with the moronic variant since day 1 and those people have only exacerbated the problem... ;)

anti-vaxxers are filling up the ICUs with omicron cases

they should pay for their own hospital expenses given we've provided then with free inoculation

NSW has brought back QR codes and masks for indoors

a wise move given omicron is spiralling out of control

Ok, now we have a label to apply to a bunch of you.

Headline: "Covid catastrophists are FURIOUS after Nick Coatsworth said Omicron WON'T be a disaster for Australia: 'More dangerous than Covid conspiracy theorists'"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10338535/Nasty-backlash-erupts-Dr-Nick-Coatsworth-said-Omicron-WONT-disaster-Australia.html

It's actually now becoming a pandemic of "Covid catastrophists". The latest data out of Denmark confirms the trend that it's mostly the vaccinated who are getting Omicron. Even if you factor in the percentage of vaxed/unvaxed in the population, at best it means the vaccines are ineffective.



https://twitter.com/Covid19Crusher/status/1472495177046663173

This mania of "Covid catastrophe" causes a person to look at data below from the W.H.O. VigiAccess database showing historical highs of vaccine damage - and that fear of Covid catastrophe drives the person to accept what some doctors are calling the most deadly vaccine in history.



How deadly? The above chart shows 2,457,386 side effects in 1 year for Covid new-technology MRNA vaccines -- compared to 272,202 side effects for the flu jab using conventional technology. But -- notice -- those 272,202 are for 53 years. That's an average of 5,135 per year for flu jabs.

In summary, 2,457,386 side effects per year for Covid jabs, versus 5,135 per year for flu jabs.

What causes a human mind to look at that, and think it is ok, for a disease that the Australian Bureau of Stats says the chance of dying, for people aged below 59, is 0.1% for males and 0.004% for females.

"Covid catastrophe" syndrome. And the people inflicted with this fear will mock and slander those people who came to the alternate decision, based on their review of facts and data.

And those doctors who are warning of danger, the Covid catastrophists  call them quacks!

And remember, you guys have signed up for these Covid vaxes every 6 months for "many years". Headline: "Getting a Covid-19 booster could become a routine 'every six months for many years'"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10338457/Getting-Covid-19-booster-routine-six-months-years-Australia.html

I'll summarise the 2 competing narratives:

1) Government/Mainstream - MRNA vaccines are safe; doctors warning of dangers are quacks; nurses reporting masses of vaccine-damage in hospitals, they're lying; side effects are rare; the government databases of historically-high damage, they're not verified, and all those people had coincidences; e.g. just because people drop dead 2 days after the jab doesn't mean it was the jab that caused it; vaccines keep you safe; vaccines stop transmission (debunked).

2) Doctors warning of danger - from the government databases of deaths and side effects, these MRNA vaccines are the most dangerous in history; doctors warning of dangers are being censored and slandered; nurses reporting masses of vaccine-damage in hospitals, willing to lose their jobs rather than take the jab; the reason for vaccinated being highly vulnerable to later variants is because their natural immune system have been damaged by these genetic-manipulation drugs.

You do realise that these MRNA vaccines perform genetic manipulation on your body's cells? I'm not saying it changes your DNA. Rather, it forces your body's cells to do something the cells were never meant to do, i.e. become little factories to manufacture analogous spike proteins. That is the key difference between these MRNA new-tech vaccines, versus conventional vaccines used for hundreds of years. You guys are the guinea pigs for the new tech, forced to do so under threat of losing your jobs.

The final delusion of the Covid catastrophists is that, because their mantra is that it is a "pandemic of the un-vaccinated", they can look at the following chart and think it is nonsense:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf

This is ultimate of mind control, where a person can see a chart that clearly shows the vaccinated are the ones dying. But the Covid catastrophists keeps believing the opposite.

I'm not downplaying the danger of Covid. Instead, I've weighed the dangers of the vaccines, and have chosen to deal with the Covid risk using what appears to me to be a far safer approach.

You might disagree, but people shouldn't loose their jobs over following a 2nd Medical Opinion from doctor on the other side of the debate.

Forget that fuckhead for a moment. This reintroduction of masks into NSW fucking up Christmas and New Years Eve is fucked. Fucking fucked beyond a fucking joke.

1 000 000 test in the last week. 7 deaths. 145 ICU cases. Fuck right off. Less than the flu mortality now.

Absolute fucking bollocks.

I feel sorry for any poor bastard in hospitality that has just had their world turned upside down.

Ridiculous.

/rant.

its still early in the virus cycle

the early days of Delta it was also thought to be less virulent and look how that turned out

its better to be safe than sorry and we still have a number of anti-vaxxers continuing to spread COVID and fill up ICUs
Delta is still spreading like a wildfire across the nation

its important now more than ever that we listen to the experts and not rely on our feels

remember how "I did my own research" turned out...

The following medical research claims there's a virtual zero chance of dying from Covid when there's a Vitamin D blood level of 125 nmol/L.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8541492/

Dr John Campbell agrees

https://youtu.be/V5g9AVqRsjo

In comparison to this level of 125 nmol/L, the Australian Department of Health indicates that about a quarter of Australians have less than 50 nmol/L.

https://www.health.gov.au/resources/pregnancy-care-guidelines/part-g-targeted-maternal-health-tests/vitamin-d-status

If a bottle of Vitamin D tablets costs a few dollars, why not do that? It can't hurt.

If you're so willing to try a deadly vaccine that is underperforming from its promises, why not try something that is rather safe? Why is to soooo easy to persuade you to take something potentially dangerous, but sooooo difficult to persuade you to do something that is generally safe?

Remember, when the Covid-terrorised say Vitamin D is "debunked", there are two opposite groups of doctors in this debate, and just because you say it is debunked does not mean the other side agree with you.

Also, here's a Covid protocol used with success by many doctors:

https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/

Absolutely no way can I agree with any of this.

No fucks given anymore given the low mortality.

Time to get on with life.

I'm actually concerned with the rate of hospitalisation. I think we started to buckle when there were more than 600-700 (non-ICU) last time.

Headline: "Omicron Covid IS milder, three major studies confirm: Real-world research in England, Scotland and South Africa find [Omicron] variant reduces risk of hospital admission by up to 80 per cent"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10339089/Omicron-Covid-MILDER-three-major-studies-confirm-Research-England-Scotland-South-Africa.html

Also. real world data indicates the vast majority of Omicron cases are the vaccinated, not the un-vaccinated, at least from data from Denmark, U.K., U.S., Canada and Denmark:



Look at the above chart carefully. About 90% of Omicron cases in Denmark are vaccinated, whereas Denmark has a vax rate of 81%. That means the vax ineffectiveness is tipping towards more vaccinated getting Omicron than the unvaccinated.

https://www.sst.dk/en/english/corona-eng/status-of-the-epidemic/covid-19-updates-statistics-and-charts

https://twitter.com/Covid19Crusher/status/1472495177046663173

https://albertanationals.com/2021/12/14/dr-bonnie-henry-majority-of-omicron-cases-are-among-the-vaccinated-in-british-columbia/
Headline: "Majority of Omicron Cases Are Among The Vaccinated In British Columbia"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10271463/First-sign-Omicon-spreading-Britain-Chart-shows-uptick-CASES-super-variant-hallmarks.html
Headline: "Majority of England's Omicron cases ARE double-vaccinated"

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/most-reported-us-omicron-cases-have-hit-fully-vaccinated-cdc-2021-12-10/
Headline: Most reported U.S. Omicron cases have hit the fully vaccinated -CDC

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/13/oxford-university-study-says-omicron-can-hit-the-double-vaccinated.html
Headline: Omicron can hit fully vaccinated, Oxford study says

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/coronavirus-early-us-omicron-cases-detected-mainly-in-vaccinated-people-2648394
Headline: Early US Omicron Cases Detected Mainly In Vaccinated People

"Omicron can hit fully vaccinated, Oxford study says, as UK prepares for tidal wave of cases"
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/13/oxford-university-study-says-omicron-can-hit-the-double-vaccinated.html

From what I can see among my friends in Australia, who have been vaxed, the above has not hit home. Most are living in la-la land from their imbibing of propaganda that the vaccines are somehow protecting them from getting Covid. You hear this sense of denial when people are making their holiday plans for Christmas and New Year, and they say "We're vaccinated" -- revealing either them being unaware of the emerging data, or them living in denial.

This is so simple that even an Aussie sockah fan can understand.

inb4 another post where he tries to convince himself that we insult him because we've been trained by the media to "ignore the facts", not because of his lies and dishonesty.  

While you major on insulting me, today's news is that in Australia, the boosters are now down to four months, then three months.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-vaccination-boosters-interval-shortened-four-months-greg-hunt/04955cb5-0e34-41de-9bee-26b7ff0cf7c0

Can you imagine injecting something into yourself every 3-4 months with the following risk profile? Why don't you seriously do some research on Ivermectin - not just from the Mainstream that calls it "horse medicine" -- and other protocols that are using used successfully with far less risk. And bottom line, remember, the Australian Bureau of Statistics says, if you're a male under 59 (which you might not be), you would have a 0.1% chance of dying from Covid, and and 0.004% for females. Particularly with Omicron being around 80% less severe than Delta.

And remember that study that showed, in the months immediately after the vax, the person's risk of heart disease increased by a non-insignificant amount.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

Are you capable of one post where you don't have to make up a lie to get a point across?  

Earlier when I pulled you up on this you claimed I was merely nitpicking your sentences and it was just an honest mistake on your part .  But  here  you are saying the EXACT same thing even though it's not true.  You are doing this intentionally. 

And in the other thread you are bringing up tweets about Cristian Eriksen again, even though you know that he wasn't vaccinated. 

Every post has a lie in it.  That's why we insult you John smith. 

I have no problem installing updates to my COVID protection every 3 months

Curious what long term research data on the efficacy and safety profile have you based your informed decision on?