|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xDoes anyone else find this weird and a bit of a worry? Football Australia head of referees Nathan Magill said the organisation’s refereeing department had undergone an “extensive” off-season “overhaul”, with the priorities being “player safety”, “maximising ball in play”, and “enhancing the image of the game”. Is that really a referee's job? I think this was quoted in the coverage at the time, in the spirit to clean this up in the game early. Was stupid the moment I heard it and as mentioned the red being pulled out, said it warranted a yellow nothing more. It went for the VAR check and I was sure they would have said go review it on the screen but no. His boot clipped/glanced by his shin imo and Caceras played it more than anything as any pro would for he sure wasn't suffering from it soon enough. Prob had some marks on his shin but it wasn't in malice just stupid technique more than anything. I actually don't get RIMB being on the fence, explains his pov but its either ither not 50/50 for how can that be a decision needs to be made in real time or VAR. They both stuffed up in light of the extensive season overhaul of ruinning the game.
Love Football
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roar in me Blood
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xDoes anyone else find this weird and a bit of a worry? Football Australia head of referees Nathan Magill said the organisation’s refereeing department had undergone an “extensive” off-season “overhaul”, with the priorities being “player safety”, “maximising ball in play”, and “enhancing the image of the game”. Is that really a referee's job? I think this was quoted in the coverage at the time, in the spirit to clean this up in the game early. Was stupid the moment I heard it and as mentioned the red being pulled out, said it warranted a yellow nothing more. It went for the VAR check and I was sure they would have said go review it on the screen but no. His boot clipped/glanced by his shin imo and Caceras played it more than anything as any pro would for he sure wasn't suffering from it soon enough. Prob had some marks on his shin but it wasn't in malice just stupid technique more than anything. I actually don't get RIMB being on the fence, explains his pov but its either ither not 50/50 for how can that be a decision needs to be made in real time or VAR. They both stuffed up in light of the extensive season overhaul of ruinning the game. Hey LFC - not on the fence - I thought the red excessive. My comments were making the only sense of it I could - that I could and still can see how someone could call it a red. Most disagree with that principle - I am fine with that.
When I wear their colours, I am the club.
|
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
ah ok got it, trying to make sense of it both ways - christ I should read more carefully lol
Love Football
|
|
|
|
|
clockwork orange
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xIbusuki launched with studs exposed. He had no control. Just because he did not make a full on connection does not change the dangerous nature of the action. There is always a chance that the opponent holds back when he sees the dangerous challenge coming in and making the action seem less dangerous. I thought the red card was excessive personally, but I totally understand why it was given. So every time a player does an overhead kick they should be sent off regardless of whether contact was made, because there is a chance that they COULD have kicked someone’s head off. Then we could introduce preventative red cards. If a player has a history of send offs then after a certain number of card free games just send them off in case they make dangerous contact with someone during the game. Yes, every time a player does an overhead kick near enough to an opponent to make contact it is a dangerous play. Where does it say you have to make contact, break a leg, knock someone unconscious? Dangerous play does not require death or injury. People like you cheering this garbage on is why it just gets worse every year. Will you be happy when it’s a totally non-contact sport? I didn't say I agreed with it - just that I could understand the call. He lunged in a dangerous manner and was uncontrolled. Unlike you, the MRP could not understand the call at all. Perhaps your understanding will improve over time.
|
|
|
|
|
Dan_The_Red
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xIbusuki launched with studs exposed. He had no control. Just because he did not make a full on connection does not change the dangerous nature of the action. There is always a chance that the opponent holds back when he sees the dangerous challenge coming in and making the action seem less dangerous. I thought the red card was excessive personally, but I totally understand why it was given. So every time a player does an overhead kick they should be sent off regardless of whether contact was made, because there is a chance that they COULD have kicked someone’s head off. Then we could introduce preventative red cards. If a player has a history of send offs then after a certain number of card free games just send them off in case they make dangerous contact with someone during the game. Yes, every time a player does an overhead kick near enough to an opponent to make contact it is a dangerous play. Where does it say you have to make contact, break a leg, knock someone unconscious? Dangerous play does not require death or injury. People like you cheering this garbage on is why it just gets worse every year. Will you be happy when it’s a totally non-contact sport? I didn't say I agreed with it - just that I could understand the call. He lunged in a dangerous manner and was uncontrolled. Unlike you, the MRP could not understand the call at all. Perhaps your understanding will improve over time. Unlikely. This dud’s opinion is based solely on the involvement of AU, a team he’s excessively criticised for some time.
|
|
|
|
|
Roar in me Blood
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
I really don't understand personal abuse for having a different perspective. Funny that you use the word 'understanding' when you possess so little of it in the real world sense. You are both much better than me at football. Well in and enjoy the win.
When I wear their colours, I am the club.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
I'll tell you what happened. The ref got it wrong. The VAR bloke thought that maybe there was enough in it to not run over the top of him and make him look like a goose (because you can justify almost any decision) so he upheld the decision. And here we are.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIbusuki launched with studs exposed. He had no control. Just because he did not make a full on connection does not change the dangerous nature of the action. There is always a chance that the opponent holds back when he sees the dangerous challenge coming in and making the action seem less dangerous. I thought the red card was excessive personally, but I totally understand why it was given. So every time a player does an overhead kick they should be sent off regardless of whether contact was made, because there is a chance that they COULD have kicked someone’s head off. Then we could introduce preventative red cards. If a player has a history of send offs then after a certain number of card free games just send them off in case they make dangerous contact with someone during the game. Yes, every time a player does an overhead kick near enough to an opponent to make contact it is a dangerous play. Where does it say you have to make contact, break a leg, knock someone unconscious? Dangerous play does not require death or injury. People like you cheering this garbage on is why it just gets worse every year. Will you be happy when it’s a totally non-contact sport? I didn't say I agreed with it - just that I could understand the call. He lunged in a dangerous manner and was uncontrolled. Unlike you, the MRP could not understand the call at all. Perhaps your understanding will improve over time. Unlikely. This dud’s opinion is based solely on the involvement of AU, a team he’s excessively criticised for some time. got to say I haven't noticed RIMB picking on your AU as much as you point out but bantering with Davide of late that is pretty light hearted imo. The tackle don't think he means any harm but expressing his pov (too complicated :)) much like we all see any part of a game differently. Lets just chill and get on having discussion/banter - the experts stuff up, every ref is different as we know how they react, us devotee armchair experts are never wrong :)
Love Football
|
|
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIbusuki launched with studs exposed. He had no control. Just because he did not make a full on connection does not change the dangerous nature of the action. There is always a chance that the opponent holds back when he sees the dangerous challenge coming in and making the action seem less dangerous. I thought the red card was excessive personally, but I totally understand why it was given. So every time a player does an overhead kick they should be sent off regardless of whether contact was made, because there is a chance that they COULD have kicked someone’s head off. Then we could introduce preventative red cards. If a player has a history of send offs then after a certain number of card free games just send them off in case they make dangerous contact with someone during the game. Yes, every time a player does an overhead kick near enough to an opponent to make contact it is a dangerous play. Where does it say you have to make contact, break a leg, knock someone unconscious? Dangerous play does not require death or injury. People like you cheering this garbage on is why it just gets worse every year. Will you be happy when it’s a totally non-contact sport? I didn't say I agreed with it - just that I could understand the call. He lunged in a dangerous manner and was uncontrolled. Unlike you, the MRP could not understand the call at all. Perhaps your understanding will improve over time. Unlikely. This dud’s opinion is based solely on the involvement of AU, a team he’s excessively criticised for some time. got to say I haven't noticed RIMB picking on your AU as much as you point out but bantering with Davide of late that is pretty light hearted imo. Ha ha I like to think we have a secret gentlemanly agreement to dislike the other's team or opinion on style/tactics without ever getting TOO personal. RIMB is a good guy who sees things differently to a lot of people who might have more of a "traditional" football upbringing but that's a good thing. Just like if all teams played the same formation/style of football the sport would be much more boring
|
|
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI really don't understand personal abuse for having a different perspective. Funny that you use the word 'understanding' when you possess so little of it in the real world sense. You are both much better than me at football. Well in and enjoy the win. Hey Roar in me Blood just realised we haven't heard from you here since this. Don't not come back at some point
|
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI really don't understand personal abuse for having a different perspective. Funny that you use the word 'understanding' when you possess so little of it in the real world sense. You are both much better than me at football. Well in and enjoy the win. Hey Roar in me Blood just realised we haven't heard from you here since this. Don't not come back at some point here here mate, I noticed he being MIA last BR game waiting on his summaries :)
Love Football
|
|
|
|