|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
I would call this a major statistical anomaly. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter.
|
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. But to me that's moreso speaks to me on how bad "the right" candidate is presenting themselves that those traditionally on that side and "despised" by "the left" as you say won't support them.
|
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. But to me that's moreso speaks to me on how bad "the right" candidate is presenting themselves that those traditionally on that side and "despised" by "the left" as you say won't support them. how do you figure that? What if those 'traditionally' on that side as you put it are the problem...? I recall leftist figures making whole movies about how much they despised the Bush administration back in the 2000s. Now all of a sudden your ilk embrace these people which you'd previously labeled war criminals.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPresidential debates are all about optics and nothing about facts. Regardless they have no bearing on the outcome of elections in any case... people have already made their choice who they'll vote for and they'll see their candidate as the winner of the debate, as the USA is a very polarised country. I remember through the 80s the Democrats were announced the winners of every presidential debate and the Republicans still won every election. In this era however it only matters who counts the votes. I didn't see it but judging by the tone of this Trump got his arse handed to him. Not really, however as I said its all about optics and the moderators had Harris's back all the way through. The uninformed won't realise her lies they'll just see the mods and PBS pundits who they think are neutral backing her and that'll be enough to convince them she won. Trump got baited by her lies instead of simply ignoring them which was a misstep IMO. Overall it was a waste of time and I can see why it will be the only debate in this election. Well he certainly won't be asking for another one following that shitshow. You see everything through the lens of a true believer. Your assessment is completely partisan. Others will see the opposite. Serious question for you. When Trump says kids are going to school a boy and coming home a girl and vice versa what do you think of that? Do you think he's normal or a tad unhinged? Not at all. He was speaking in hyperbole but there is truth to it as schools have become promoters of gender dysphoria in a lot of the western world. Why all of a sudden are there so many 'trans' kids when there were practically none 30 years ago? It didn't happen out of thin air. Your absolute pig ignorance is showing. Do you think there's more homosexuals now than 50 years ago or do you think, just maybe, because you don't have to hide your homosexuality and live a lie like you used to that they've just become more apparent. Causation DOES NOT equal correlation. Do you honestly not think that there's just as many homosexuals in Iran or Afghanistan than in Sydney or that just perhaps, seeing you can be strung from a tree in those countries, they might just hide it over there. It's the same as autism. Decades ago they were 'special' or 'weirdos' or a bit 'off'. There are no more autistic kids than there used to be, just better diagnoses. It's absolutely laughable, and a sign of how unthinking you are, that you believe there's more 'trans' kids now because of, presumably, wokeness. Disappointingly I see someone has 'liked your post. When I went to school there were zero 'trans' kids. Zero. Now I'm hearing from ex teachers that kids are coming to school and identifying as animals and the teachers have to tolerate their decision. Clearly an avid reader of the daily mail or some other rag. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litter_boxes_in_schools_hoax#:~:text=Starting%20in%202021%2C%20a%20false,the%20furry%20or%20otherkin%20subcultures.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPresidential debates are all about optics and nothing about facts. Regardless they have no bearing on the outcome of elections in any case... people have already made their choice who they'll vote for and they'll see their candidate as the winner of the debate, as the USA is a very polarised country. I remember through the 80s the Democrats were announced the winners of every presidential debate and the Republicans still won every election. In this era however it only matters who counts the votes. I didn't see it but judging by the tone of this Trump got his arse handed to him. Not really, however as I said its all about optics and the moderators had Harris's back all the way through. The uninformed won't realise her lies they'll just see the mods and PBS pundits who they think are neutral backing her and that'll be enough to convince them she won. Trump got baited by her lies instead of simply ignoring them which was a misstep IMO. Overall it was a waste of time and I can see why it will be the only debate in this election. Well he certainly won't be asking for another one following that shitshow. You see everything through the lens of a true believer. Your assessment is completely partisan. Others will see the opposite. Serious question for you. When Trump says kids are going to school a boy and coming home a girl and vice versa what do you think of that? Do you think he's normal or a tad unhinged? Not at all. He was speaking in hyperbole but there is truth to it as schools have become promoters of gender dysphoria in a lot of the western world. Why all of a sudden are there so many 'trans' kids when there were practically none 30 years ago? It didn't happen out of thin air. Your absolute pig ignorance is showing. Do you think there's more homosexuals now than 50 years ago or do you think, just maybe, because you don't have to hide your homosexuality and live a lie like you used to that they've just become more apparent. Causation DOES NOT equal correlation. Do you honestly not think that there's just as many homosexuals in Iran or Afghanistan than in Sydney or that just perhaps, seeing you can be strung from a tree in those countries, they might just hide it over there. It's the same as autism. Decades ago they were 'special' or 'weirdos' or a bit 'off'. There are no more autistic kids than there used to be, just better diagnoses. It's absolutely laughable, and a sign of how unthinking you are, that you believe there's more 'trans' kids now because of, presumably, wokeness. Disappointingly I see someone has 'liked your post. When I went to school there were zero 'trans' kids. Zero. Now I'm hearing from ex teachers that kids are coming to school and identifying as animals and the teachers have to tolerate their decision. Clearly an avid reader of the daily mail or some other rag. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litter_boxes_in_schools_hoax#:~:text=Starting%20in%202021%2C%20a%20false,the%20furry%20or%20otherkin%20subcultures. No, I'm hearing this from real people in my circle...in Australia, ie the 'real' world. You're obviously the avid Daily Mail reader.
|
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. But to me that's moreso speaks to me on how bad "the right" candidate is presenting themselves that those traditionally on that side and "despised" by "the left" as you say won't support them. how do you figure that? What if those 'traditionally' on that side as you put it are the problem...? I recall leftist figures making whole movies about how much they despised the Bush administration back in the 2000s. Now all of a sudden your ilk embrace these people which you'd previously labeled war criminals. "My like" Haha, just for clarifications sake, 'my like' is also the 'right' (in Australia). As I said earlier, I give more of a shit to the compost heap than who wins this election in the US.
|
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. But to me that's moreso speaks to me on how bad "the right" candidate is presenting themselves that those traditionally on that side and "despised" by "the left" as you say won't support them. how do you figure that? What if those 'traditionally' on that side as you put it are the problem...? I recall leftist figures making whole movies about how much they despised the Bush administration back in the 2000s. Now all of a sudden your ilk embrace these people which you'd previously labeled war criminals. "My like" Haha, just for clarifications sake, 'my like' is also the 'right' (in Australia). As I said earlier, I give more of a shit to the compost heap than who wins this election in the US. apart from the fact your post doesn't make any sense, then why comment in this thread if you don't have any interest in the topic...
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPresidential debates are all about optics and nothing about facts. Regardless they have no bearing on the outcome of elections in any case... people have already made their choice who they'll vote for and they'll see their candidate as the winner of the debate, as the USA is a very polarised country. I remember through the 80s the Democrats were announced the winners of every presidential debate and the Republicans still won every election. In this era however it only matters who counts the votes. I didn't see it but judging by the tone of this Trump got his arse handed to him. Not really, however as I said its all about optics and the moderators had Harris's back all the way through. The uninformed won't realise her lies they'll just see the mods and PBS pundits who they think are neutral backing her and that'll be enough to convince them she won. Trump got baited by her lies instead of simply ignoring them which was a misstep IMO. Overall it was a waste of time and I can see why it will be the only debate in this election. Well he certainly won't be asking for another one following that shitshow. You see everything through the lens of a true believer. Your assessment is completely partisan. Others will see the opposite. Serious question for you. When Trump says kids are going to school a boy and coming home a girl and vice versa what do you think of that? Do you think he's normal or a tad unhinged? Not at all. He was speaking in hyperbole but there is truth to it as schools have become promoters of gender dysphoria in a lot of the western world. Why all of a sudden are there so many 'trans' kids when there were practically none 30 years ago? It didn't happen out of thin air. Your absolute pig ignorance is showing. Do you think there's more homosexuals now than 50 years ago or do you think, just maybe, because you don't have to hide your homosexuality and live a lie like you used to that they've just become more apparent. Causation DOES NOT equal correlation. Do you honestly not think that there's just as many homosexuals in Iran or Afghanistan than in Sydney or that just perhaps, seeing you can be strung from a tree in those countries, they might just hide it over there. It's the same as autism. Decades ago they were 'special' or 'weirdos' or a bit 'off'. There are no more autistic kids than there used to be, just better diagnoses. It's absolutely laughable, and a sign of how unthinking you are, that you believe there's more 'trans' kids now because of, presumably, wokeness. Disappointingly I see someone has 'liked your post. When I went to school there were zero 'trans' kids. Zero. Now I'm hearing from ex teachers that kids are coming to school and identifying as animals and the teachers have to tolerate their decision. Clearly an avid reader of the daily mail or some other rag. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litter_boxes_in_schools_hoax#:~:text=Starting%20in%202021%2C%20a%20false,the%20furry%20or%20otherkin%20subcultures. No, I'm hearing this from real people in my circle...in Australia, ie the 'real' world. You're obviously the avid Daily Mail reader. Absolute zero chance of this being true. Z.E.R.O.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. But to me that's moreso speaks to me on how bad "the right" candidate is presenting themselves that those traditionally on that side and "despised" by "the left" as you say won't support them. how do you figure that? What if those 'traditionally' on that side as you put it are the problem...? I recall leftist figures making whole movies about how much they despised the Bush administration back in the 2000s. Now all of a sudden your ilk embrace these people which you'd previously labeled war criminals. "My like" Haha, just for clarifications sake, 'my like' is also the 'right' (in Australia). As I said earlier, I give more of a shit to the compost heap than who wins this election in the US. apart from the fact your post doesn't make any sense, then why comment in this thread if you don't have any interest in the topic... Makes plenty of sense, to be honest. Why comment? Well, do I get a vote? No. Is it newsworthy? Yeah, of course. That's where my interest is. My interest isn't in supporting who wins/loses this election, it's about knowing the landscape afterwards.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. THis.. How unhinged is this guy? Personally I could not give two farks who wins. Either scenario is absolute popcorn
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. THis.. How unhinged is this guy? Personally I could not give two farks who wins. Either scenario is absolute popcorn I do. Trump is a danger to democracy. He's undermined faith in institutions, the law, science, the government and elections. He should be in jail. It will take decades, if ever, to restore what this fuckwit has done over the last 9 years. And he's enabled that sort of behavior to creep in here.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xPresidential debates are all about optics and nothing about facts. Regardless they have no bearing on the outcome of elections in any case... people have already made their choice who they'll vote for and they'll see their candidate as the winner of the debate, as the USA is a very polarised country. I remember through the 80s the Democrats were announced the winners of every presidential debate and the Republicans still won every election. In this era however it only matters who counts the votes. I didn't see it but judging by the tone of this Trump got his arse handed to him. Not really, however as I said its all about optics and the moderators had Harris's back all the way through. The uninformed won't realise her lies they'll just see the mods and PBS pundits who they think are neutral backing her and that'll be enough to convince them she won. Trump got baited by her lies instead of simply ignoring them which was a misstep IMO. Overall it was a waste of time and I can see why it will be the only debate in this election. Well he certainly won't be asking for another one following that shitshow. You see everything through the lens of a true believer. Your assessment is completely partisan. Others will see the opposite. Serious question for you. When Trump says kids are going to school a boy and coming home a girl and vice versa what do you think of that? Do you think he's normal or a tad unhinged? Not at all. He was speaking in hyperbole but there is truth to it as schools have become promoters of gender dysphoria in a lot of the western world. Why all of a sudden are there so many 'trans' kids when there were practically none 30 years ago? It didn't happen out of thin air. I had this very same conversation 2-3 weeks ago now at dinner with a few other couples, friends from high school mostly. Weve all got 2-3 kids, at different levels of education, from state school, to catholic to private, even a couple at higher la-di-da exclusive schools.. The very same "fact" was brought up by my mate and a quick "poll" amongst the group, including their nieces, nephews, friends kids at other schools, kids from soccer clubs, netball ballet you name it, basically everyone within our 7 couples' circle of acquaintance (I dont know maybe 200-300 kids all told if not much more) NOBODY had ever came across or heard of a kid at their school having a sex change.... Genuinely interested if anyone here has an actual case of a child being "brainwashed" into changing their fiddly bits??? For the sake of transparency I would NEVER allow my children to even contemplate the idea, what they decide after they turn 21 and are fully functioning , mature adults, and have spoken to serious mental health practitioners, is their choice but until then I would have to be 6ft under before it happened... https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+trans+kids+in+school+in+the+usa&oq=how+many+trans+kids+in+school+in+the+usa&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDU1MDVqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 No mate..... I am talking about real life... Here in Australia... Youve repeated a few times that people "in your circle" have come accross this.... I haven't, and I dont believe anyone else here has either.... If it such a massive blight on society then why not?
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. THis.. How unhinged is this guy? Personally I could not give two farks who wins. Either scenario is absolute popcorn I do. Trump is a danger to democracy. He's undermined faith in institutions, the law, science, the government and elections. He should be in jail. It will take decades, if ever, to restore what this fuckwit has done over the last 9 years. And he's enabled that sort of behavior to creep in here. If he makes it through these elections alive that is a minor miracle....
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. THis.. How unhinged is this guy? Personally I could not give two farks who wins. Either scenario is absolute popcorn And he's enabled that sort of behavior to creep in here. Yes, fair point. Just need to look at the numbskulls supporting him on this site.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. THis.. How unhinged is this guy? Personally I could not give two farks who wins. Either scenario is absolute popcorn I do. Trump is a danger to democracy. He's undermined faith in institutions, the law, science, the government and elections. He should be in jail. It will take decades, if ever, to restore what this fuckwit has done over the last 9 years. And he's enabled that sort of behavior to creep in here. If he makes it through these elections alive that is a minor miracle.... You;d have to be a bit of a cock to have two people in a month try and kill you
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
First reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIt shouldn't be difficult to guess given it was said by a presidential candidate. Sure, I know who said it. But what's the context of you needing us to know? I'll let you figure that out. I've already figured out you're an idiot, so... not sure what else you need me to figure out why it matters what Kamala Harris said about an open letter. ad hominem doesn't strengthen your position, not that you had one it just makes you look unstable in this case if this is the candidate that you support know that she is aligned with the people the left despised during the 2000s I'm not American, so I don't support either. THis.. How unhinged is this guy? Personally I could not give two farks who wins. Either scenario is absolute popcorn I do. Trump is a danger to democracy. He's undermined faith in institutions, the law, science, the government and elections. He should be in jail. It will take decades, if ever, to restore what this fuckwit has done over the last 9 years. And he's enabled that sort of behavior to creep in here. If he makes it through these elections alive that is a minor miracle.... You;d have to be a bit of a cock to have two people in a month try and kill you Correction - 2 attempts, and one assassination by Harris at the debate.
|
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
+xFirst reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant Why would a Trump supporter want to shoot Trump? You went with this line last time. it doesn't fly. The rhetoric by your ilk incites these of acts of violence.
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xFirst reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant Why would a Trump supporter want to shoot Trump? You went with this line last time. it doesn't fly. The rhetoric by your ilk incites these of acts of violence. I think the correct term would probably be 'ex-Trump supporter' - someone who supported him in the past, but feels wronged by him for whatever reason.
|
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xFirst reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant Why would a Trump supporter want to shoot Trump? You went with this line last time. it doesn't fly. The rhetoric by your ilk incites these of acts of violence. I think the correct term would probably be 'ex-Trump supporter' - someone who supported him in the past, but feels wronged by him for whatever reason. Garbage. My bridge sale is on FB marketplace if you're interested.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xFirst reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant Why would a Trump supporter want to shoot Trump? You went with this line last time. it doesn't fly. The rhetoric by your ilk incites these of acts of violence. flip flopping unhinged lunatics? It's what happens when you appeal to loonies. Nearly every case of domestic violence is by someone who used to love the person. So would you argue 'why would someone who is marred to someone hurt them?' Have you been in the real world yet?
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xFirst reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant Why would a Trump supporter want to shoot Trump? You went with this line last time. it doesn't fly. The rhetoric by your ilk incites these of acts of violence. I think the correct term would probably be 'ex-Trump supporter' - someone who supported him in the past, but feels wronged by him for whatever reason. Garbage. My bridge sale is on FB marketplace if you're interested. Wait, so you do think it's a current Trump supporter? But, sounds about right for you: peddling shit no one needs.
|
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xFirst reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant Why would a Trump supporter want to shoot Trump? You went with this line last time. it doesn't fly. The rhetoric by your ilk incites these of acts of violence. I think the correct term would probably be 'ex-Trump supporter' - someone who supported him in the past, but feels wronged by him for whatever reason. Garbage. My bridge sale is on FB marketplace if you're interested. Wait, so you do think it's a current Trump supporter? But, sounds about right for you: peddling shit no one needs. he's one of yours... confirmed https://x.com/B2RKN/status/1835457217358696724
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xFirst reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant Why would a Trump supporter want to shoot Trump? You went with this line last time. it doesn't fly. The rhetoric by your ilk incites these of acts of violence. I think the correct term would probably be 'ex-Trump supporter' - someone who supported him in the past, but feels wronged by him for whatever reason. Garbage. My bridge sale is on FB marketplace if you're interested. Wait, so you do think it's a current Trump supporter? But, sounds about right for you: peddling shit no one needs. he's one of yours... confirmed https://x.com/B2RKN/status/1835457217358696724 Again, not one of mine - I don't have a side there.
|
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 215,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xFirst reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant Why would a Trump supporter want to shoot Trump? You went with this line last time. it doesn't fly. The rhetoric by your ilk incites these of acts of violence. I think the correct term would probably be 'ex-Trump supporter' - someone who supported him in the past, but feels wronged by him for whatever reason. Garbage. My bridge sale is on FB marketplace if you're interested. Wait, so you do think it's a current Trump supporter? But, sounds about right for you: peddling shit no one needs. he's one of yours... confirmed https://x.com/B2RKN/status/1835457217358696724 Again, not one of mine - I don't have a side there. he's a leftist, ergo one of yours
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xFirst reports are it was a trump supporting covid conspiracist - let's see if it was a haitian immigrant Why would a Trump supporter want to shoot Trump? You went with this line last time. it doesn't fly. The rhetoric by your ilk incites these of acts of violence. I think the correct term would probably be 'ex-Trump supporter' - someone who supported him in the past, but feels wronged by him for whatever reason. Garbage. My bridge sale is on FB marketplace if you're interested. Wait, so you do think it's a current Trump supporter? But, sounds about right for you: peddling shit no one needs. he's one of yours... confirmed https://x.com/B2RKN/status/1835457217358696724 Again, not one of mine - I don't have a side there. he's a leftist, ergo one of yours Again, I don't vote left. Comprehension not one of your strong suits m'lady
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
"He's one of yours"
lol lol
like as if people here support US politicians
And hilarious that twitter link is rock hard proof for yourself. Maybe that misinfo bill for social media companies is actually a good thing
|
|
|
|