afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Why can't you just delete them, marty?
|
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
WGMG: Getting a random letter about an appointment for a Tuberculosis check up. I never made the appointment have no idea who the fuck did. Whoever did has all my details and it wasn't any of my family.
The only reasoning I have come to is that someone from my tafe classes got it and Tafe are getting everyone checked. It's a stretch but possible.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
WGMG: Doctor cancelled my appointment for tomorrow. Not impressed.
|
|
|
martyB
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Why can't you just delete them, marty? Because she's nice and i like talking to her, just not every.fucking.time. I log on. ](*,)
|
|
|
Bonkers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
martyB wrote:afromanGT wrote:Why can't you just delete them, marty? Because she's nice and i like talking to her, just not every.fucking.time. I log on. ](*,) Sounds like.. she LOVES you. :shock: WGMG: centrelink interview.
|
|
|
martyB
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Bonkers wrote:martyB wrote:afromanGT wrote:Why can't you just delete them, marty? Because she's nice and i like talking to her, just not every.fucking.time. I log on. ](*,) Sounds like.. she LOVES you. :shock: Priiiiiiidy sure she doesn't, being a lesbian and all. (and not the good kind)
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
martyB wrote:afromanGT wrote:Why can't you just delete them, marty? Because she's nice and i like talking to her, just not every.fucking.time. I log on. ](*,) So fuck her, she'll never talk to you again :lol:
|
|
|
Bonkers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
martyB wrote:Bonkers wrote:martyB wrote:afromanGT wrote:Why can't you just delete them, marty? Because she's nice and i like talking to her, just not every.fucking.time. I log on. ](*,) Sounds like.. she LOVES you. :shock: Priiiiiiidy sure she doesn't, being a lesbian and all. (and not the good kind) :?
|
|
|
davidsomethingelse
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:marconi101 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Quote:How would you like your 7 year old nephew to be abused for a wearing a scarf of a particular team by a bunch of disrespectful low lives? I wouldn't be putting a 7 year old in an environment where he's exposed to those kind of morons. How dare I take a child to a football game, seriously like who the fuck does that? Why would you take the kid to a game where you know there's going to be lout opposition fans? Take the kid to a North Queensland, Perth or Gold Coast game and you wouldn't have that problem. This, no shit, is the dumbest comment I have ever seen on 442. ](*,)
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
WGMG: Mark Taylor bitching about Beer's 'wicket' yesterday, saying that he doesn't like that the umpire can review like that, because it 'takes away from the moment' and 'people watching want to see a debutant get a wicket, not a no ball'. HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BOWLED A NO BALL THEN SHOULD HE! Fucking idiot.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
wgmg:downloading newest squads for fifa11 and danny allsop aint in the victory one !!!
|
|
|
buddha69
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Funky Munky wrote:WGMG: Mark Taylor bitching about Beer's 'wicket' yesterday, saying that he doesn't like that the umpire can review like that, because it 'takes away from the moment' and 'people watching want to see a debutant get a wicket, not a no ball'. HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BOWLED A NO BALL THEN SHOULD HE! Fucking idiot. Mark Taylor is the worst bloke to listen to
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
wgmg: getting sunburnt at colligwood childrens farm! even thought it was a mild 22 degrees!!
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Funky Munky wrote:WGMG: Mark Taylor bitching about Beer's 'wicket' yesterday, saying that he doesn't like that the umpire can review like that, because it 'takes away from the moment' and 'people watching want to see a debutant get a wicket, not a no ball'. HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BOWLED A NO BALL THEN SHOULD HE! Fucking idiot. This so much, the rules are the rules you twat, it's perfectly with in the umpire's rights to ask for the third umpire's advice on any sort of a desiscion. Do you moan when it goes to the third umpire after a close run out? Of course not, so why should you moan when the umpires go to the third umpire on any other sort of desiscion. I wonder what the reaction would be if it was an English bowler rather than Beer...
|
|
|
Bonkers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:wgmg: getting sunburnt at colligwood childrens farm! even thought it was a mild 22 degrees!! I will never sympathise about sunburn with a man of colour.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Bonkers wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:wgmg: getting sunburnt at colligwood childrens farm! even thought it was a mild 22 degrees!! I will never sympathise about sunburn with a man of colour. hey im white for a filo:p
|
|
|
Benjo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
WGMG: Mum bitching about me walking the dog. She wanted me to do it in the morning before breakfast, but was ok about me doing it afterwards. I started walking him and it starts chucking it down. When i come back, she starts yelling at me, saying i should've done it before breakfast because she knew it was going to rain. Never said anything about it was going to rain after breakfast and yet she still blames me.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Gooner4life_8 wrote:Funky Munky wrote:WGMG: Mark Taylor bitching about Beer's 'wicket' yesterday, saying that he doesn't like that the umpire can review like that, because it 'takes away from the moment' and 'people watching want to see a debutant get a wicket, not a no ball'. HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BOWLED A NO BALL THEN SHOULD HE! Fucking idiot. This so much, the rules are the rules you twat, it's perfectly with in the umpire's rights to ask for the third umpire's advice on any sort of a desiscion. Do you moan when it goes to the third umpire after a close run out? Of course not, so why should you moan when the umpires go to the third umpire on any other sort of desiscion. I wonder what the reaction would be if it was an English bowler rather than Beer... I don't understand where he's coming from here. Should we just say 'to hell with the rules' because it's his debut? What the fuck? Why is Mark Taylor even commentating? I guess because he's the antithesis of Tony Grieg.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Gooner4life_8 wrote:Funky Munky wrote:WGMG: Mark Taylor bitching about Beer's 'wicket' yesterday, saying that he doesn't like that the umpire can review like that, because it 'takes away from the moment' and 'people watching want to see a debutant get a wicket, not a no ball'. HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BOWLED A NO BALL THEN SHOULD HE! Fucking idiot. This so much, the rules are the rules you twat, it's perfectly with in the umpire's rights to ask for the third umpire's advice on any sort of a desiscion. Do you moan when it goes to the third umpire after a close run out? Of course not, so why should you moan when the umpires go to the third umpire on any other sort of desiscion. I wonder what the reaction would be if it was an English bowler rather than Beer... I don't understand where he's coming from here. Should we just say 'to hell with the rules' because it's his debut? What the fuck? Why is Mark Taylor even commentating? I guess because he's the antithesis of Tony Grieg. I think it's more a case of 'to hell with technology'.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:I think it's more a case of 'to hell with technology'. Luddites :roll:
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:afromanGT wrote:Gooner4life_8 wrote:Funky Munky wrote:WGMG: Mark Taylor bitching about Beer's 'wicket' yesterday, saying that he doesn't like that the umpire can review like that, because it 'takes away from the moment' and 'people watching want to see a debutant get a wicket, not a no ball'. HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BOWLED A NO BALL THEN SHOULD HE! Fucking idiot. This so much, the rules are the rules you twat, it's perfectly with in the umpire's rights to ask for the third umpire's advice on any sort of a desiscion. Do you moan when it goes to the third umpire after a close run out? Of course not, so why should you moan when the umpires go to the third umpire on any other sort of desiscion. I wonder what the reaction would be if it was an English bowler rather than Beer... I don't understand where he's coming from here. Should we just say 'to hell with the rules' because it's his debut? What the fuck? Why is Mark Taylor even commentating? I guess because he's the antithesis of Tony Grieg. I think it's more a case of 'to hell with technology'. No, he's actually said he's in favour of technology, he just doesn't like that it interfers with 'the moment'. #-o
|
|
|
socceroos_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
WGMG: Tumblr's servers being worse than FFT's.
|
|
|
Benjo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
The FFT servers are normally good for me. :S
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Funky Munky wrote:No, he's actually said he's in favour of technology, he just doesn't like that it interfers with 'the moment'. #-o That sounds like a bit of a contradiction in terms. You can't have the technology being instantaneous.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
WGMG: People not cleaning the fucking toasted sandwich maker. There's melted cheese and grease everywhere. Fucking disgusting. #-o
|
|
|
buddha69
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.6K,
Visits: 0
|
WGMG: Mates arguing with me about Robbie Kruse. They don't understand
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
What is there to argue about? It's really quite simple. He used to be really shit, he got better, now he's jut shit. /argument.
|
|
|
buddha69
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.6K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:What is there to argue about? It's really quite simple. He used to be really shit, he got better, now he's jut shit. /argument. Pretty much my argument. They then proceed to use his 10 goals, 3 assists. Touch for Thompson's goal, run for Ricardinho's. Selection in Asian Cup Squad. IT DOES NOT MEAN SHIT
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
buddha69 wrote:afromanGT wrote:What is there to argue about? It's really quite simple. He used to be really shit, he got better, now he's jut shit. /argument. Pretty much my argument. They then proceed to use his 10 goals, 3 assists. Touch for Thompson's goal, run for Ricardinho's. Selection in Asian Cup Squad. IT DOES NOT MEAN SHIT 10 goals doesn't mean much when you've wasted more chances than the rest of the team put together. Watching him against Newcastle, he didn't know what to do with the ball, he'd pass it to the outside when there was open space to run and shoot. Bill Shankly said it best when he said "If you don't know what to do with the ball, put it in the back of the net and we'll discuss options later."
|
|
|
buddha69
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.6K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:buddha69 wrote:afromanGT wrote:What is there to argue about? It's really quite simple. He used to be really shit, he got better, now he's jut shit. /argument. Pretty much my argument. They then proceed to use his 10 goals, 3 assists. Touch for Thompson's goal, run for Ricardinho's. Selection in Asian Cup Squad. IT DOES NOT MEAN SHIT 10 goals doesn't mean much when you've wasted more chances than the rest of the team put together. Watching him against Newcastle, he didn't know what to do with the ball, he'd pass it to the outside when there was open space to run and shoot. Bill Shankly said it best when he said "If you don't know what to do with the ball, put it in the back of the net and we'll discuss options later." Of course they only watch the highlights. They don't know that
|
|
|